ParanetOnline

The Dresden Files => DF Spoilers => DF Reference Collection => Topic started by: Serack on August 02, 2011, 07:05:13 AM

Title: The truth about Fitz
Post by: Serack on August 02, 2011, 07:05:13 AM
So I'm now home from the Washington DC signing, and I got to ask Jim if there was significance to his choice of Fitz's name.  First he confirmed that he was aware Fitz means bastard (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fitz), and he softly confirmed that this was intentional, and we would see how eventually. 

So Electric MacButters and I were discussing this on the 3 hour drive home, and during some serious mutual brainstorming, I came up with THE DEFINITIVE ANSWER to who Fitz is (with some key insights from EMacB)

But I'm not going to tell you.  (ooooh that is fun!) Instead I will give you a big hint, and let you work it out yourselves.  We have everything we need to figure it out now that we know for sure that the name was intentional.

The hint:  He's cursed.  edit:  This is conjecture if the "definitive" theory is true -Serack

P.S. Toe-mas took a flip video, and will be posting the entire signing on youtube asap.



Edit:  Copied from reply #30

Ok, so the "definitive answer" part might have partially been due to my being up waaaaaay past my bed time, but here's the evidence which still has me convinced.

Quote from: GS
He was youthfully scrawny, his skin bronze enough to look Native American, though his tangled red hair and pug nose argued otherwise. His eyes were an odd shade of brown, so light as to be nearly golden.

Ok first bronze skin on a redhead is really unusual.  ESPECIALLY in a snow storm.  Redheads typically have fair skin.  When they get a lot of sun they get freckles on top of freckles.  So the Redhead and bronze skin are off, and are probably from the 2 different sides of the family.
But here's the clincher.

Quote from: FM ch13
I broke out into a cold sweat and looked out the other window.
Directly into a pair of brilliant, feral, amber eyes.
...
"I am Harley MacFinn's fiance.  Miss West," she said.  "I am called Tera."

Quote from: FM ch9
Tera West was there, [/snip]
She was naked, her body a uniform shade of brown

Also, after mentioning how Father Forthill could sense Harry and Stuart because the good priests, ministers, shaman's can sense spirits Stuart says:

Quote from: GS ch9
"And dogs."  Sir Stuart added.  "Maybe one in ten of them seem to have a talent for sensing us.  Probably why they are always barking."

So if he is half wolf=>human shape-shifter, that might help explain why he can hear spirits.

Finally we have this.

Quote from: WoJ
“I seem to remember at a Q&A a few years ago, you said Tera West would be showing up in Book 13 aka Ghost Story. Is this still happening, or has her character been shuffled down the line a bit due to the change in total number of case file books?”
My first answer is “bump her down a couple.” But on the other hand, it might be interesting to see her again in this book.
We’ll see what happens. :)

I think she showed up in proxy too, as in not her, but as the mother of a new main character.

I believe Tera West is the only other character described with golden colored eyes, she had bronze colored hair, she was a Wolf, thus likely to have progeny that sense sprits, and she was the Fiancee of an Irishman she never married.

Sounds like all the pieces you need to put together a young man described in the first quote.

The only off part is the timeline.  I believe FM was around 12 years before GS, which means that either Fitz was already around somewhere, or he aged quickly (dog years).
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: Vairelome on August 02, 2011, 07:10:05 AM
*happy dance*

My Fitz-post was my first one on these forums!  (I think I was the first person to point out his possible name significance?  I didn't see earlier ones when I posted.)

Thank you for asking Jim about it, Serack.   :)
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: rags on August 02, 2011, 07:14:26 AM
Oh this is cruel!! Its bad enough that Jim keeps things secret!!  :'(

Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: Serack on August 02, 2011, 07:18:21 AM
*happy dance*

My Fitz-post was my first one on these forums!  (I think I was the first person to point out his possible name significance?  I didn't see earlier ones when I posted.)

Thank you for asking Jim about it, Serack.   :)

Yes and no.  Actually parthagenon seems to have been aware of the meaning, and referred to it obliquely before you did.

Fitz, the bastard.   :D

The Summer Knight is Fix.

But you were the first to point out the significance.

A possible tell-tale for future revelations concerning new character Fitz...his name.

From Webster's Online Dictionary (Uh...Google it to verify, I'm a nub at making links.  Oh, emphasis mine.):

Fitz (n.):  1. A son; -- used in compound names, to indicate paternity, esp. of the illegitimate sons of kings and princes of the blood; as, Fitzroy, the son of the king; Fitzclarence, the son of the duke of Clarence.

(The duke of Clarence during the Regency period of England [early 1800s] had 10 illegitimate children, collectively known at the time as "the Fitzclarences."  Also, the duke of Clarence was a royal duke--one of the younger sons of George III--not merely one of the high nobility.)

Now, the royal bloodline may or may not be implied here for SotC purposes, but the name itself directly calls attention to paternity, and in my opinion, that is highly unlikely to be accidental.  I don't have the book in front of me, but the physical characteristic I remember about Fitz was his red hair; perhaps one of the very clever people on this board remember more details that might be salient?

This post is what inspired the question, and I'd say it's one of the better poster observations I have seen on here. 

Kudos
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: Serack on August 02, 2011, 07:20:54 AM
Oh this is cruel!! Its bad enough that Jim keeps things secret!!  :'(

If I figured it out within a week of release, someone else would have been sure to figure it out before the release of the next book.  I suspect the "Big clue" will be a honking giant arrow to the answer for someone before I get up later.
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: Vairelome on August 02, 2011, 07:21:24 AM
Ah, congrats to parthagenon, then, good catch!
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: Serack on August 02, 2011, 07:29:54 AM
Ah, congrats to parthagenon, then, good catch!

No good catch for you to have realized that this was significant enough to start a topic highlighting it.  I started my own topic because yours emphasizes the SotC angle, which isn't significant to my revelation. 
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: Icecream on August 02, 2011, 07:31:06 AM
Oooh, first thought on hearing Fitz's name was that means bastard (I only know from a different series FitzChivalry as a name) but didn't give any thought to it. Ooooh new SotC theory, good one guys. Or Hendrick's bastard child  :D
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: Vairelome on August 02, 2011, 07:40:58 AM
If Fitz's mother conceived and gave birth to him while unmarried, and then later married a physically abusive man, it would both make a perfectly plausible addition to his backstory, as well as set up a rather dark joke for Jim to make later, once someone found out that Fitz had been "beaten like a..."   :(

Another angle to approach this from might be to consider who named him "Fitz."  Would it have been Baldy, or a name he was given earlier in life?  Considering that Jim has said the name is relevant, I think it's likely that the namer must have had some insight into the reasons for conferring the name upon him, as opposed to it being a happy accident of name and circumstance.
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: The_Tuninator on August 02, 2011, 07:50:36 AM
So, the next Knight of the Cross, then?
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: Serack on August 02, 2011, 07:57:34 AM
So, the next Knight of the Cross, then?

Although Jim has been saying this signing tour how he isn't sure who he wants to give the swords too among the candidates he has in mind, because he's not sure he wants to be that mean to them, I was being more literal when I said he's cursed.
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: raidem on August 02, 2011, 07:58:30 AM
so FitzMacFinn? the next loup-garou?
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: Serack on August 02, 2011, 08:03:40 AM
so FitzMacFinn? the next loup-garou

My clue isn't based on the text.  So now you have to back your claim
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: Farwind on August 02, 2011, 08:48:59 AM
Red hair (does he have red hair?) = possible Irish Decent
Fitz = Bastard. The last Loup-Garou is dead, and if he were the father, that would make him a bastard.
Loup-Garou is a curse which got passed from generation to generation. If he is from the same family, then he would be afflicted with the curse.
(This is all the evidence for that theory that I can think of off the top of my head. It isn't very much though. I'm sure there are several thousand kids in the Dresdenverse which have the traits of being a cursed redheaded bastard)

Though I have to wonder, why the hell can he hear dead people?
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: rags on August 02, 2011, 10:52:48 AM
Appearence:
Quote
He was youthfully scrawny, his skin bronze enough to look Native American, though his tangled red hair and pug nose argued otherwise. His eyes were an odd shade of brown, so light as to be nearly golden.
a little under 6 feet.

He can communicate with spirits and has some weak(??) magic in him.

Apparently, he's also a bastard and is cursed........

Thats all the info i could synthesize from GS. Frankly, I am lost......I have spent over an hour breaking my head over this and have come up with squat.....
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: ave744 on August 02, 2011, 11:08:40 AM
irish descent mom= murphy, specially since she hates him for killing her neighbor

father who gives him the magic gene= that policeman with some magic?
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: Paladino on August 02, 2011, 11:13:28 AM

The hint:  He's cursed.

P.S. Toe-mas took a flip video, and will be posting the entire signing on youtube asap.

Loup garou??

Well, that fact the Macfin died was something that was bothering me a lot, since it never said he had offspring.

"Chauncy smiled, a rather intimidating expression. "MacFinn is a member of an ancient family line from an island known as Ireland. His family has a notable history. Sometime in the murky past, legend would have it, the man known as Saint Patrick cursed his ancestor to become a ravening beast at every full moon. The curse came with two addenda. First, that it would be hereditary, passing down to someone new each and every generation. And second, that the cursed line of the family would never, ever die out, lasting until the end of days."

So it fits very well... Althougth Ill agree with who wasked why can he hear dead people??
And by the story on GS it seens he has been on Chicago for a while, where are the murders at full moon? Does he have a circle too?
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: jeno on August 02, 2011, 11:34:57 AM
I think Harry or Murphy would have noticed if a new loup-garou was running around Chicago. And I'm pretty sure Baldy would be in a bunch of little pieces by now, too. Unless the curse went to someone else, but he's still in the lineage?

Though I wonder, would a kid know if they were a changeling? All the changelings in Summer Knight knew what they were, but we don't know how they initially came about that knowledge.
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: jeno on August 02, 2011, 11:43:11 AM
Some things that we know happened vaguely around the time of Fitz's birth, at least according to the timeline:

-Harry first comes to Chicago
-The Unseelie Incursion
-The Unseelie Accords
-Alicia Carpenter is born
-Ivy is born
-Susan joins the Arcane
-The last trial for a Law violator until Molly
-The last time Charity sees Harry before the events of "Grave Peril."  Michael is injured, and Charity thoroughly chews Harry out.


Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: Mira on August 02, 2011, 11:49:16 AM
Oooh, first thought on hearing Fitz's name was that means bastard (I only know from a different series FitzChivalry as a name) but didn't give any thought to it. Ooooh new SotC theory, good one guys. Or Hendrick's bastard child  :D

Yes, fitz does mean bastard, my husband's aunts were big into genealogy, and my husband was waving a coat of arms around smugly but then I pointed out the "fitz" part of the name on it and what it meant. 
Quote
To me that is telling me that she agreed to what he was doing, earlier she'd said she didn't think she could do it, she couldn't feel her hands, she needed his help.  Though he'd given her the "ammo" to change, she still, in the little bit of sanity she had left, was giving her consent right there, telling him it was ok (at least to this reader).  Maybe she knew what he had done and just wanted to help him finish it, knowing how hard it would be for him, because she knew him so well.  She wanted him to save their daughter, and to her, at least in that point of time, it didn't matter how.

In the Dresdenworld, oh yeah anything is possible.. Or it could simply be a shortened version of Fitzgerald given as a nick name.  I saw a movie once called "The Luck of the Irish,"  the hero's last name was Fitzgerald, everyone called him "Fitz."
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: raidem on August 02, 2011, 12:20:53 PM
Yeah, about the MacFinn angle, I was mostly going off the "He is cursed" hint.  Other than that and what others have said above, I really cant connect the two definitively.  How do you Serack arrive at him being cursed?  That said, Tera is referred to as a "dark-complected woman", Fitz as dark as Native American.  Tera's eyes are described as "eerie shade of amber that could barely be construed as brown", Fitz's as odd shade of brown, almost golden. 
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: ebliss1 on August 02, 2011, 12:22:34 PM
So from what I can gather here, we're looking at MacFinn's bastard son that he had with Tera West (from the "cursed" emphasis-MacFinn, and the eyes-Tera). Tera knew how to keep MacFinn away from people when he went all Loupy, so that would explain why there have been no Loup Garou sightings since MacFinn died. I don't think we know enough about how the family curse works to determine if Fitz starting getting all Loup at the next full moon after MacFinn died, or if its age-related, or if there's some sort of time break before the curse kicks back in again. Its possible that Fitz hasn't started changing, but will at any time now. Its also possible that he has been changing for a while now, but wasn't with Baldy long enough to have gone through a full moon cycle.

Some other conjections: If my guess that Tera was his mother is correct, it could be that her wolf nature ameliorates the Loup Garou change somewhat. If the curse was to become what a human would term "a ravening beast", the Loup Garou would result from a human transforming. To a wolf, which Tera was - even though she could shape change to a human, "a ravening beast" might mean something completely different. Heck, to a wolf, it might mean a human hunter, so the Loup Garou transformation may not result in a full-on "American Werewolf in London" thing, but rather something that looks more like Hugh Jackman in the Wolverine role, which would make him easier to pass as human and not quite so bloodthirsty.

The royal bastard link would make him a prime candidate for Michael's sword, eventually - possibly even setting up a big showdown of Fitz vs Daniel as Daniel strikes me as the type to feel that his father's sword is somehow his birthright.
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: Aminar on August 02, 2011, 12:23:57 PM
Where do we get that he's cursed from?  I want that evidence before I can buy into the idea you know what's going on.
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: Thork on August 02, 2011, 01:01:56 PM
Yeah, golden eyes + red hair seems a decent pointer to MacFinn / Tera West parentage, though not conclusive. And Fitz certainly is following a potential "knight of the cross" path, in that he's a horrible sinner and murderer who's found redemption. And the "line not dying out" bit has been bugging me for a long time  (though it *could* mean we're already at the End of Days).

A few things this theory needs:

1) What's source for Fitz being cursed? Is there WoJ, or is it just suspicion?
2) When did Tera and MacFinn first get together?
3) When does the Loup-Garou curse first become active? Is he too old, or just old enough?
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: the neurovore of Zur-En-Aargh on August 02, 2011, 01:10:24 PM
"Chauncy smiled, a rather intimidating expression. "MacFinn is a member of an ancient family line from an island known as Ireland. His family has a notable history. Sometime in the murky past, legend would have it, the man known as Saint Patrick cursed his ancestor to become a ravening beast at every full moon. The curse came with two addenda. First, that it would be hereditary, passing down to someone new each and every generation. And second, that the cursed line of the family would never, ever die out, lasting until the end of days."

Emphasis added.

Those are weasel words.  Everything Chauncey says after them can totally legitimately be truthful reporting of legends Chauncey knows full well are a pack of lies.
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: Paladino on August 02, 2011, 01:23:06 PM
Emphasis added.

Those are weasel words.  Everything Chauncey says after them can totally legitimately be truthful reporting of legends Chauncey knows full well are a pack of lies.

Really interesting point.
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: panic686 on August 02, 2011, 01:35:02 PM
Appearence:  a little under 6 feet.

He can communicate with spirits and has some weak(??) magic in him.

Apparently, he's also a bastard and is cursed........

Thats all the info i could synthesize from GS. Frankly, I am lost......I have spent over an hour breaking my head over this and have come up with squat.....


Tera and Macfinn or whatever his name was offspring... cursed with the Loup Garou but part wolf anyway. Tera looked NAtive American right?
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: Paladino on August 02, 2011, 01:36:47 PM

Tera and Macfinn or whatever his name was offspring... cursed with the Loup Garou but part wolf anyway. Tera looked NAtive American right?

Tera is a wolf who learned to shapeshift in to human.
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: toodeep on August 02, 2011, 03:27:28 PM
Tera is a wolf who learned to shapeshift in to human.

And we know she is out there, since LtW said at one point that she sent her regards.  Now the question is, from what we know of wolves and of Tera from what we saw of her, would she allow her pup to run around being abused by humans?  Somehow I doubt that, so I am doubting that he is a child of Tera's.  That doesn't remove the idea of him being a MacFinn Fitz though, though it would seem odd that someone so serious about responsibility would take fathering a fitz so irresponsibly that he winds up running around in the streets due to neglect with a possible ancestral curse about to come down on him... or that a wolf would love a man that could be that irresponsible.  That then implies that if he is MacFinn's fitz that MacFinn probably didn't know about him, which is possible but seems odd for a normal human American woman impregnated by a rich man to just disappear and not ask for child support of any nature.  And obviously someone knew something about his parentage (if say his mother died in childbirth) since they knew enough to know that he was a fitz.
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: Gman on August 02, 2011, 03:38:59 PM
Lots of interesting guesses. Fitz is definitely interesting and may be a scion of a human and something else. For all I know Listen to Winds and Terra were the parents. From the eyes, the skin coloring, resistance to mind magic and seeing the dead he may have something non human in his ancestry or something cursed and changed.
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: Serack on August 02, 2011, 03:47:09 PM
Ok, so the "definitive answer" part might have partially been due to my being up waaaaaay past my bed time, but here's the evidence which still has me convinced.

Quote from: GS
He was youthfully scrawny, his skin bronze enough to look Native American, though his tangled red hair and pug nose argued otherwise. His eyes were an odd shade of brown, so light as to be nearly golden.

Ok first bronze skin on a redhead is really unusual.  ESPECIALLY in a snow storm.  Redheads typically have fair skin.  When they get a lot of sun they get freckles on top of freckles.  So the Redhead and bronze skin are off, and are probably from the 2 different sides of the family.
But here's the clincher.

Quote from: FM ch13
I broke out into a cold sweat and looked out the other window.
Directly into a pair of brilliant, feral, amber eyes.
...
"I am Harley MacFinn's fiance.  Miss West," she said.  "I am called Tera."

Quote from: FM ch9
Tera West was there, [/snip]
She was naked, her body a uniform shade of brown

Also, after mentioning how Father Forthill could sense Harry and Stuart because the good priests, ministers, shaman's can sense spirits Stuart says:

Quote from: GS ch9
"And dogs."  Sir Stuart added.  "Maybe one in ten of them seem to have a talent for sensing us.  Probably why they are always barking."

So if he is half wolf=>human shape-shifter, that might help explain why he can hear spirits.

Finally we have this.

Quote from: WoJ
“I seem to remember at a Q&A a few years ago, you said Tera West would be showing up in Book 13 aka Ghost Story. Is this still happening, or has her character been shuffled down the line a bit due to the change in total number of case file books?”
My first answer is “bump her down a couple.” But on the other hand, it might be interesting to see her again in this book.
We’ll see what happens. :)

I think she showed up in proxy too, as in not her, but as the mother of a new main character.

I believe Tera West is the only other character described with golden colored eyes, she had bronze colored hair, she was a Wolf, thus likely to have progeny that sense sprits, and she was the Fiancee of an Irishman she never married.

Sounds like all the pieces you need to put together a young man described in the first quote.

The only off part is the timeline.  I believe FM was around 12 years before GS, which means that either Fitz was already around somewhere, or he aged quickly (dog years).
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: Blackblade on August 02, 2011, 03:54:39 PM
I believe there was a WoJ stating that West would show up again within a few books.
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: Serack on August 02, 2011, 03:58:28 PM
I believe there was a WoJ stating that West would show up again within a few books.

Already covered ;)
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: rags on August 02, 2011, 04:11:28 PM
I don't fully agree with you at all......I too approached from the appearance angle and then went to wikipedia list of characters and tried to make a short list......I came up with Tera , Injun joe (Native American), Mac Finn, and white court vamps (cursed) but then kinda got distracted by the "definitive answer"....
I am not completely happy with Tera West angle.....why would the woman who cared for the alphas leave her own son?? But, I do agree that Tera West is the only one that fits the appearance....and from the given info no other conclusion can be drawn. Perhaps the Alphas were a sort of substitute for her "lost son"??
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: Serack on August 02, 2011, 04:15:35 PM
I don't fully agree with you at all......I too approached from the appearance angle and then went to wikipedia list of characters and tried to make a short list......I came up with Tera , Injun joe (Native American), Mac Finn, and white court vamps (cursed) but then kinda got distracted by the "definitive answer"....
I am not completely happy with Tera West angle.....why would the woman who cared for the alphas leave her own son?? But, I do agree that Tera West is the only one that fits the appearance....and from the given info no other conclusion can be drawn. Perhaps the Alphas were a sort of substitute for her "lost son"??

The cursed hint is 100% my hint to point people at MacFinn.  It's only based off of the other evidence, it's not canon.
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: raidem on August 02, 2011, 04:15:59 PM
Talking about the Loup-Garou wanted to mention that they have "supernatural speed, power, and ferocity...They're immune to poison and to any kind of sorcery that goes for the Brain."  Now, that said, I'm not sure if this qualifies while they are not in form.  I did notice that Harry is suprised with the following:  "Fitz slammed a fist into the other man’s face with speed and violence enough to impress even me—and I’ve seen some fast things in action."  One thing I found interesting is that Fitz and gang go over to the Carpenters to eat while Murphy, Harry, Molly, Bob assault Corpsetakers compound.  And we know who is there that will sniff him out.
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: Paladino on August 02, 2011, 04:21:07 PM
I got say that Serack theory is really sound, but you can never be 100% sure on TDF. But I'll tie my boat with his in this one. Since he seens to be in Chicago for a while (Time enough to joing a gang and make some friends he care about, and beside he says something about the last 6 months got much worse.) the only things left unexplained is why no loup-garou rampage on full moon. But  there is a lot of possible explanations for that(age, wolf-descendence, own secret circle).

Well, will have to wait for the next book or maybe more untill this is comfirmed. By the way any WoJ on possible release date for CD?

Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: Serack on August 02, 2011, 04:36:34 PM
I got say that Serack theory is really sound, but you can never be 100% sure on TDF. But I'll tie my boat with his in this one. Since he seens to be in Chicago for a while (Time enough to joing a gang and make some friends he care about, and beside he says something about the last 6 months got much worse.) the only things left unexplained is why no loup-garou rampage on full moon. But  there is a lot of possible explanations for that(age, wolf-descendence, own secret circle).

Well, will have to wait for the next book or maybe more untill this is comfirmed. By the way any WoJ on possible release date for CD?

Someone asked him that at DC and he said something about it being due for him in... bah can't remember exactly but he said that he thought it would get released in July.  He sounded very un sure though, like that's not his purview, he's just the creative type that spends all day eavesdropping on his imaginary friends and then writing down what they say.
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: JinElusion on August 02, 2011, 04:47:23 PM
Talking about the Loup-Garou wanted to mention that they have "supernatural speed, power, and ferocity...They're immune to poison and to any kind of sorcery that goes for the Brain."  Now, that said, I'm not sure if this qualifies while they are not in form.  I did notice that Harry is suprised with the following:  "Fitz slammed a fist into the other man’s face with speed and violence enough to impress even me—and I’ve seen some fast things in action."  One thing I found interesting is that Fitz and gang go over to the Carpenters to eat while Murphy, Harry, Molly, Bob assault Corpsetakers compound.  And we know who is there that will sniff him out.

And IIRC, He also gained immunity to Baldy's little mind control trick
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: Paladino on August 02, 2011, 04:53:19 PM
Someone asked him that at DC and he said something about it being due for him in... bah can't remember exactly but he said that he thought it would get released in July.  He sounded very un sure though, like that's not his purview, he's just the creative type that spends all day eavesdropping on his imaginary friends and then writing down what they say.

LOL That must be a fantasy writers problem. Well July is not so far away... And there is a lot of releases in the middle. New Saxon Chronicles, New Gentleman Bastards, Memory of Light, probally a new Witcher book, + plus Fool Moon portuguese edition (witch will compell me to read all the other in english again after i finish it).

I think i can surive untill there.

Thx Serack.
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: Arkham8 on August 02, 2011, 05:14:04 PM
Red hair.

Can hear the dead.

Very tall.

Scrawny, but still a teenager.

Probably a bastard child.

Therefore...the child of Gard and Hendricks.

I don't know about the Loup-Garou theory...wouldn't he have exhibited symptoms? Especially if Momma was a wolf and Daddy was a...well...
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: Bones on August 02, 2011, 05:16:40 PM
Sounds good to me.

I can't remember how old Fitz is, but I do think a curse like that would be more effective if it had an age attached as the trigger.

I also have an issue with Tera West abandoning him, though. She doesn't seem the type. But we have no idea what's been going on with her all these years. She may have been injured or something. Maybe MacFinn sent him away and whoever was caring for him lost him somehow. Or maybe he ate his caretakers and ended up in Chicago. There are possibilities, I suppose.

Good spec.  :)
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: Lajos on August 02, 2011, 05:20:20 PM
Its possible that Fitz hasn't started changing, but will at any time now. Its also possible that he has been changing for a while now, but wasn't with Baldy long enough to have gone through a full moon cycle.

IIRC, MacFinn said his curse kicked in while he was fighting in Vietnam.
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: Paladino on August 02, 2011, 05:26:10 PM
Yes, but he never said if it was relevant with his age, or if that was the moment his father died...

But it open one more theory that the first transformation is related with emotions of risk to ones life....

Well at least Jim has a lot of options..
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: ebliss1 on August 02, 2011, 05:27:03 PM
Quote
I am not completely happy with Tera West angle.....why would the woman who cared for the alphas leave her own son?? But, I do agree that Tera West is the only one that fits the appearance....and from the given info no other conclusion can be drawn. Perhaps the Alphas were a sort of substitute for her "lost son"??

In the wild, wolves leave their mothers at around 2 years of age. If Fitz is a wolf/Loup Garou-Human hybrid, that number may extend a few years since humans mature slower than wolves. This would keep the idea that Tera West was pregnant with MacFinn's child when Fool Moon happened in the relative timeline that we have here. It would be perfectly normal for Fitz to have been born to Tera as a hybrid, to have lived with her for a few years and then to have set off on his own to establish his own pack and start a family, or perhaps he was cast out by Tera because his Loup Garou nature made him a danger to her and the rest of her pack. He would have been ill-prepared for life in a city and would have sought the protection of a pack of sorts, which Baldy sort of provided. Also, since wolves typically support their pack-mates and only fight amongst themselves for alpha-male dominance, his actions toward Zero and the others are consistent.

His travel to Chicago makes a kind of sense in a couple ways also. He may have known who his father was through Tera, or he may have some pull toward where his father established his "den". Either that, or he has some sort of pull toward the individual who killed his father, Harry.

Finally, as we have seen with Uriel in the past, he likes to set op events to have oblique downstream effects. Bringing Harry's soul back so that he can 'find his killer" may have been just the mechanism for Uriel to save Fitz from being killed by Baldy, and thus starting along the path toward redemption - first for choosing the "light path" and perhaps eventually winding up as Amoracchius's weilder as some sort of penance to finally break the family curse...

Quote
Therefore...the child of Gard and Hendricks.

Interesting idea, but this doesn't work for me since neither Hendricks or Gard have amber eyes or look even vaguely American Indian.

Quote
IIRC, MacFinn said his curse kicked in while he was fighting in Vietnam.

If true, then this would indicate that the curse kicks in around adulthood - 18 or so
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: tallgrrl on August 02, 2011, 05:41:51 PM
Interesting all around!  I've really got to read or listen to GS again... obviously three times isn't enough.  So far, the only book in the whole series I've only read once is Changes. I just can't bring myself to read it again, and yes, I'm sure I'm missing a lot of details because of it... I still can't do it though.
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: Quantus on August 02, 2011, 05:48:40 PM
Interesting theory.  From the description of Fitz, and the special note from the dubious demon source about how the line will always survive, I like it. 

On Tera abandoning her pup, it does seem a bit out of character (though admittedly thats based on very little), but there are a lot of things that could have been out of her control.  He may have run away, she may have thought he needed to live with humans, somebody higher up in her pack's pecking order may have forced her to do it, etc.  I dont see her making the choice purely due to the danger of the loup garou, as she began her relationship with Finn in spite of if not because of the curse. 
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: the neurovore of Zur-En-Aargh on August 02, 2011, 05:58:45 PM
And we know she is out there, since LtW said at one point that she sent her regards.

We know she was out there in SK.  If she has a normal wolf lifespan, she might well not be around now for entirely natural reasons.
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: Quantus on August 02, 2011, 06:01:38 PM
Unless a wolf wizard get the same sort of extended lifespan as a human one...  ;)
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: Serack on August 02, 2011, 06:22:44 PM
EMacB has a tiein theory that is pretty interesting.  Waiting impatiently for him to post it.
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: brokenward on August 02, 2011, 06:23:10 PM
My guess: He is the son of the hellhound or drakul and he gets fidelacchius.
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: the neurovore of Zur-En-Aargh on August 02, 2011, 06:23:27 PM
Unless a wolf wizard get the same sort of extended lifespan as a human one...  ;)

But is she a wolf wizard, or a wolf werehuman; ISTR there being something in the RPG about Harry actually being wrong that the Alphas are like practitioners with one spell, but that it's a different thing altogether, and I am not recalling anything to say the Alphas get extended lifespans.
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: Quantus on August 02, 2011, 06:39:38 PM
But is she a wolf wizard, or a wolf werehuman; ISTR there being something in the RPG about Harry actually being wrong that the Alphas are like practitioners with one spell, but that it's a different thing altogether, and I am not recalling anything to say the Alphas get extended lifespans.
Interesting point.  Id always assumed the Alpha's wouldnt get the lifespan purely on a strength basis, working off the unverified assumption that the lifespan/healing perk comes into play around the same general power level as the Sight, Soulgazes, and the murphionic field, but I have nothing to really back that up.  Would a wolf Werehuman be anything life the difference between a weregoat and a goatwere? (mentioned by bob in passing in SmF)

Can't speak to RPG material, as I don't have a local gaming group anymore and so have never had the need to crawl through them like I should. 
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: Isendre on August 02, 2011, 06:43:49 PM
Just a thought, but Tera was normally a wolf from what I gather, and if she gave birth to a human, it would make sense to me at least that like Harry with little Maggie she might try to put him somewhere he will be safe and insulated from her and MacFinns world.

So while I can't see her willingly abandoning her child, I can see her being forced into the situation.
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: Quantus on August 02, 2011, 06:46:34 PM
Just a thought, but Tera was normally a wolf from what I gather, and if she gave birth to a human, it would make sense to me at least that like Harry with little Maggie she might try to put him somewhere he will be safe and insulated from her and MacFinns world.

So while I can't see her willingly abandoning her child, I can see her being forced into the situation.
and so then like harry Susan she ultimately failed miserably at the attempt...
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: Paladino on August 02, 2011, 06:51:45 PM
Just a thought, but Tera was normally a wolf from what I gather, and if she gave birth to a human, it would make sense to me at least that like Harry with little Maggie she might try to put him somewhere he will be safe and insulated from her and MacFinns world.

So while I can't see her willingly abandoning her child, I can see her being forced into the situation.

Assuming she knew Macfin curse was hereditary it would have been pretty stupid of her... I still belive the run away, forced was more likely. Hey and just because we he never said it, it dosent mean he dosent know what he is/will become.
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: Phariah on August 03, 2011, 12:13:15 AM
so far this theory seems to be possible just from what we have seen. i still am not sure as to the timing. also if Fitz was out in the city as a child wouldn't Tera ask Harry to watch for him?

here is another thought for the Fitz is Tera's son idea. he has pack mentality. he went back to save his pack.
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: habu987 on August 03, 2011, 12:22:13 AM
I can buy into this one!  Given, as others have mentioned, it might not match up 100% with the timeline, but other than that, it makes sense.

If he's the son of a loup-garou and a wolfwere (I think that's the proper term for Tera), what does that make him?  Were-garou?  Loup-were?  :D

On a more serious note, if he is Tera's son, he's gotta play a big part in the series from here on, or at least in the next few books.  I think he's supposed to be in his late teens, so unless he starts wolfing it up, I think we'll need at least a few more years before he becomes a big player.  Molly is just now a big player, and she's taken 6 or 7 years to get here.  I don't think any of the potential wielders of the Swords (I've seen him, Daniel, and obviously Murph floated about) are ready anytime soon for the job.

So if he is going to be hanging around, I don't think any of us can predict with any degree of accuracy what his role will be.

Serack and EmacB--kudos on this theory!
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: raidem on August 03, 2011, 12:24:21 AM
Just another observation of someone with red curly hair and golden eyes..."a very tall, slender, inhumanly beautiful woman stepped out of the smoke.  Reddish hair curled down past her hips in a riotous cascade, complementing her flawless skin, high cheekbones, and lush full bloodred lips.  Her face was ageless, and her golden eyes had vertical slits instead of pupils, like a cat..."Hello, my son," Lea purred.  I stepped forward, between the faerie and Michael and said, in a rough voice, "Hello Godmother."
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: Aakaakaak on August 03, 2011, 12:38:28 AM
Red hair.
Can hear the dead.
Very tall.
Scrawny, but still a teenager.
Probably a bastard child.
Therefore...the child of Gard and Hendricks.

Don't forget deceptively intelligent, like Hendricks.

I'm not 100% sure on Gard. (although it could fit) It could very well be, and some of those "side-by-side" moments could be less teamwork to protect the boss and more teamwork because they're in love. Because of her origins is she capable of having children? She's part of Odin's crew after all.
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: Electric MacButters on August 03, 2011, 12:41:07 AM
EMacB has a tiein theory that is pretty interesting.  Waiting impatiently for him to post it.

Do you mean my theory on Fitz's predetermined death?  I believe that Harry (or a suitable replacement) will be forced to either kill Fitz or lift his curse to kick off the BAT.  Apocalypse = End of Days.  Either Fitz's death with no heirs or the lifting of the curse would fulfill St. Patrick's stipulation that that the curse continue until the 'End of Days'.


...Or did you mean the other theory?
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: Dina on August 03, 2011, 12:53:22 AM
If he is the son of McFinn and Tera (which seems awfully probable), I don't think she would totally abandon him. So we could imagine she put him with other humans because she couldn't take care of him, but I think she visited him sometimes. Or else, how could Fitz know that Harry was a wizard who helped people? I don't think it is a common chat for orphan children, and I don't see Baldy speaking about him to the kids.

Another thing. If he is McFinn's child, shouldn't he be a millionaire heir?
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: Electric MacButters on August 03, 2011, 01:03:10 AM
A dead millionares unknown illegitimate child?  I'm sure Bank of America was tripping over itself to return his money. ;)

Seriously though, Tera never cared about the money.  Why would she bother to tell her son that his father was rich?
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: Dina on August 03, 2011, 01:08:08 AM
I mean, that would be a motive. Perhaps somebody tried to kill the child because he was rich and he get lost or something.
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: jeno on August 03, 2011, 01:44:13 AM
If he's related to MacFinn, I don't think he knows it. He was pretty freaked out when he heard Harry. "I'm not crazy, I'm not crazy." I don't he'd have had that much of a reaction if he knew he was part wolf.
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: laura118b on August 03, 2011, 01:48:50 AM
I could see Tera's pack not welcoming her son.  RL packs will drive out or make the lowest of the pack the odd wolf, even if it's just a different color than the rest of the pack.  Now picture a part human cub, I don't think it would go well.
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: Vairelome on August 03, 2011, 02:58:30 AM
raidem said:
Quote
Just another observation of someone with red curly hair and golden eyes..."a very tall, slender, inhumanly beautiful woman stepped out of the smoke.  Reddish hair curled down past her hips in a riotous cascade, complementing her flawless skin, high cheekbones, and lush full bloodred lips.  Her face was ageless, and her golden eyes had vertical slits instead of pupils, like a cat..."Hello, my son," Lea purred.  I stepped forward, between the faerie and Michael and said, in a rough voice, "Hello Godmother."

Red hair, check.  Golden eyes, check.  Fitz as Lea's son is an intriguing alternative to the MacFinn/Tera West theory.  Good catch on the visual!

I think the MacFinn/Tera West theory is better supported by Fitz' behavior patterns, though.  To my mind, Fitz doesn't feel like the Changeling scion of a Sidhe noble, and does feel like a half-human/half-wolfwere son of Tera West.  There was the possible alpha challenge to Baldy that Harry cut short and his "I'm the alpha of this smaller pack" attitude towards the younger kids ("you WILL chuck the guns" early on).

I can also see the possibility of the Loup-Garou curse not striking until after the unlucky bastard's 18th birthday.  Sadly, this leads to starting a pool on "who's gonna be Fitz' first meal?"  If this theory ends up panning out, Fitz may be a contender in the next "Which Character Has Jim Tormented The Most?" thread.
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: the neurovore of Zur-En-Aargh on August 03, 2011, 03:30:16 AM
If he is the son of McFinn and Tera (which seems awfully probable), I don't think she would totally abandon him

She could also not be with him because of being dead.
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: the neurovore of Zur-En-Aargh on August 03, 2011, 03:32:20 AM
I'm not 100% sure on Gard. (although it could fit) It could very well be, and some of those "side-by-side" moments could be less teamwork to protect the boss and more teamwork because they're in love. Because of her origins is she capable of having children? She's part of Odin's crew after all.

I don't buy this one; ever-virgin is a core attribute for Valkyries.

Incidentally, anyone got any notions why Childs was introduced ? I'm not seeing anything in GS to indicate his part could not have been played by Hendricks.
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: Dina on August 03, 2011, 03:35:10 AM
Yes, I thought so too. It is possible, I have the idea that Fitz said something as if he has been alone for a very long time but we know nothing from Tera since many years ago.

About valkyries, remember that Gard laughed at the notion.

Childs and Felicia are going to have bigger parts in the future, I think. Also, for some reason I am imagining Harry and the Justice League saving Marcone from Childs in the future.
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: Jared on August 03, 2011, 03:38:17 AM
She could also not be with him because of being dead.

Dead? Pah! It's not like just because she met MacFinn and Will through the Northwest Passage Project that she lived in the Pacific Northwest. And even if she did, it's not like she may have been living in the mountains near Seattle or Tacoma where some group could invade and kill members of the magical community...oh.
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: Piotr1600 on August 03, 2011, 03:43:12 AM
As described in the book, Childs struck me with an odd vibe.

But I haven't really completely parsed *why* just yet.
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: Aakaakaak on August 03, 2011, 03:44:34 AM
Childs and Felicia are going to have bigger parts in the future, I think. Also, for some reason I am imagining Harry and the Justice League saving Marcone from Childs in the future.

I was just going to mention that. Childs seems potentially seedy and throwaway.
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: Dina on August 03, 2011, 03:45:44 AM
And GS is about proxies. He seems to be a proxy for Marcone in GS.
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: Jared on August 03, 2011, 04:01:47 AM
As described in the book, Childs struck me with an odd vibe.

But I haven't really completely parsed *why* just yet.

Dark complexion, Mediterranean more than African. Angular, bird-of-prey-like nose. Hair is peroxide blond. Arrives early. Eyes' color between dark honey and poison ivy. Strong but not bulky, Harry likens him to a cobra? Newly arrived into Marcone's employ, acting on his behalf while the latter is in Italy. Deadly fast and graceful.

Honestly, when I first read that, I wondered if Apollo had any minions that he might hire out like Odin does Sigrun. Maybe Ra if Marcone's in Italy for the WC?
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: toodeep on August 03, 2011, 07:42:34 PM
She could also not be with him because of being dead.

Except there is a WoJ that she will be showing up again in another book.  Plus, while she could be dead now (except for the WoJ) or have kicked him out when he reached a certain age, he still would have received a loving (if very strange from our perspective) childhood and would probably know a lot more about survival than Fitz seems to if he had been raised by her during any portion of his life.
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: toodeep on August 03, 2011, 07:44:40 PM
Dark complexion, Mediterranean more than African. Angular, bird-of-prey-like nose. Hair is peroxide blond. Arrives early. Eyes' color between dark honey and poison ivy. Strong but not bulky, Harry likens him to a cobra? Newly arrived into Marcone's employ...

Hmmm, while my first thought upon reading this description here (but now while reading the book) was, "mediterranean"?  Like the connection on Madalain's phone?  Could he be a spy in Marcone's Organization from the Black Council?
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: the neurovore of Zur-En-Aargh on August 03, 2011, 07:53:04 PM
Except there is a WoJ that she will be showing up again in another book.

There was, a while ago. IIRC it was supposed to be this one, so I had been thinking that might have changed.
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: Lajos on August 03, 2011, 08:01:41 PM
Except there is a WoJ that she will be showing up again in another book.

And, in TurnCoat, I believe it was, Injun Joe passed her regards to Dresden.
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: Jared on August 03, 2011, 08:20:40 PM
Hmmm, while my first thought upon reading this description here (but now while reading the book) was, "mediterranean"?  Like the connection on Madalain's phone?  Could he be a spy in Marcone's Organization from the Black Council?

Madeline's phone had called Algeria and Egypt, so that would work. But Binder said that the guy wasn't a native English speaker. Wouldn't Harry have mentioned an accent if Childs had one (did I just miss that?)?

Also, Childs referred to Marcone as his new employer. I don't really see Marcone making a newbie his rep to the BFS. Not if the BFS is important to him and not unless he was setting said rep up for a fall. Those points will have to wait for the next few books.


Did you not think think that Childs was a supernatural?
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: sociotard on August 03, 2011, 08:35:51 PM
I don't buy this one; ever-virgin is a core attribute for Valkyries.
For the Valkyries in Norse legend, yes.  (spoilered in case you haven't  read "Side Jobs"
(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: the neurovore of Zur-En-Aargh on August 03, 2011, 08:43:48 PM
For the Valkyries in Norse legend, yes.  (spoilered in case you haven't  read "Side Jobs"

I have indeed; I read that para as Sigrun teasing Harry, plain and simple. Nothing says Valkyries can't flirt. and that para's full of salacious implication and not one direct claim that could get her into trouble.
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: sociotard on August 03, 2011, 09:55:35 PM
Why would she want to imply that she is no virgin?  To lie for the sake of lying?
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: Quantus on August 03, 2011, 10:34:42 PM
Actually, the whole Virgin thing does not appear in any of the classic sources, and was mostly a product of latter adaption into the romantic periods where any female character was supposed to be a virgin, and from the change in the usage of the term "maiden".  The classic legends had the Valkyries as Norns and royalty and shieldmaidens and such, but their virginity was no more or less integral to the role than any princess in a male dominated society;  most of the legends actually featured them falling in love with various heroes, often counter to the planned marriages of their fathers or Odin.


And thats just the classic legends.  We have a rather blatant in text citation of how the Virgin aspect is not part of the DV Valkyrie.  If you choose to disbelieve the text without any particular reasoning/evidence behind, thats up to you...
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: the neurovore of Zur-En-Aargh on August 03, 2011, 10:34:54 PM
Why would she want to imply that she is no virgin?  To lie for the sake of lying?

To give him an enjoyable experience and set of images after they've just successfully fought together.
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: the neurovore of Zur-En-Aargh on August 03, 2011, 10:36:45 PM
And thats just the classic legends.  We have a rather blatant in text citation of how the Virgin aspect is not part of the DV Valkyrie.  If you choose to disbelieve the text without any particular reasoning/evidence behind, thats up to you...

I  choose to believe that any supernatural being that implies something rather than stating it outright is covering for not directly stating it.

The more obvious the implication, the more I believe this.  Because you can't go around sticking "legend has it" before every time you might possibly want an ambiguity.
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: Serack on August 04, 2011, 01:16:20 AM
Why would she want to imply that she is no virgin?  To lie for the sake of lying?

I suggest you be satisfied with the fact that you have made your argument well enough to satisfy someone rational.
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: Aakaakaak on August 04, 2011, 03:25:26 AM
I  choose to believe that any supernatural being that implies something rather than stating it outright is covering for not directly stating it.

The more obvious the implication, the more I believe this.  Because you can't go around sticking "legend has it" before every time you might possibly want an ambiguity.

So on Wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sigr%C3%BAn), Sigrun (Gard) fell in love with Helgi, but her father has promised her to the son of king Granmarr. And then....it gets all Shakespearean and everybody dies. But thanks to Odin they're all reborn and stuff.

But, according to Gard, we shouldn't believe everything we read.
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: Granny3 on August 04, 2011, 04:34:30 AM
Just a thought:  Perhaps Tera didn't abandon her son.  Perhaps he was stolen from her? 
Timeline Fitz's age - we don't know how long Tera had been with McFinn, either so they could have had a child earlier than the book in which they first appeared. 
I think this Tera/McFinn/Fitz's theory is very logical - excellent job!!!
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: Icecream on August 04, 2011, 11:13:56 AM
Umm ok maybe waaay off, but could Fitz in someway be Bob's son. Here me out, in GS Bob's "Human form" has gold-brown eyes, what if when Harry once let Bob out he ahh went along for a ride with someone, hey he apparently started an orgy once. Then if a baby resulted, would that kid be more prone to the spirit world, I don't know be able to hear it?

Then again the dark skin of Fitz fits more in line with Tera
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: Serack on August 04, 2011, 11:34:05 AM
Umm ok maybe waaay off, but could Fitz in someway be Bob's son. Here me out, in GS Bob's "Human form" has gold-brown eyes, what if when Harry once let Bob out he ahh went along for a ride with someone, hey he apparently started an orgy once. Then if a baby resulted, would that kid be more prone to the spirit world, I don't know be able to hear it?

Then again the dark skin of Fitz fits more in line with Tera

...

it could work I guess.  The red hair bronze skin, and brown eyes seems to be more of a cluebat for the Tera/MacFinn combo, but good catch.  I like it much better than the Lea alternative theory.
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: Icecream on August 04, 2011, 11:36:44 AM
Yeah, agree the Tera/MacFinn fits way better.
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: raidem on August 04, 2011, 11:43:42 AM
Quote
Umm ok maybe waaay off, but could Fitz in someway be Bob's son. Here me out, in GS Bob's "Human form" has gold-brown eyes, what if when Harry once let Bob out he ahh went along for a ride with someone, hey he apparently started an orgy once. Then if a baby resulted, would that kid be more prone to the spirit world, I don't know be able to hear it?

"He [Bob] looked . . . quite ordinary, really. Tall, but not outrageously so; slender without being rail thin. He had decent shoulders and looked sort of familiar. He was dressed like James Dean—jeans, a white shirt, a leather biker’s jacket."  I wonder who Bob looks like, why he looks familiar.  Or is it tied in with the following:
“There’s the Bob I know and love,” I said. “Love, ick,” he replied. “And I am and I’m not. I mean, you get that I change based on who possesses the skull, right?” “Sure,” I said. “So I’m a lot like I was with you, even though I’m with Butters, because he met me back then. First impression and whatnot, highly important.”  Perhaps Bob's appearance is the amalgamation of past and present owners.
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: Icecream on August 04, 2011, 12:23:57 PM
Well yeah, but Jim does use tags for peopleand if he wanted to give a subtle hint about biologcal relationships, those physical tags could be used, any way, Bob had golden-orange lights in his eyes sockets, and two similar tags used in the same book.

But yeah, bob's a spirit and his chosen appearance is probably affected just as much as his personality by the people who hold him.
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: ImpishMortal on August 04, 2011, 12:52:45 PM
Based on what we've been given so far, I believe that the Tara + MacFinn = Fitz theory seems to be the most plausible at this point. Consider this though:
a) We don't know how they met,
b) nor if they were together in order to pass the curse off onto a magical offspring.
For all we know, this was intentional on their part in an effort to stem the power of the curse, or perhaps it was do to the mechinations of one of the bigger powers at work.
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: FFguy on August 04, 2011, 12:53:58 PM
You'll have to forgive me I didn't read all the comments so I hope I am not repeating something.

Serack, some questions for you if you can answer them.

Do you think Fitz will be able to control the change (or be trained to control it) or have his human consciousness afterward? 
Does he have a soul or some mixed hybrid of one?
Would this explain why he was able to hear Harry?

Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: Arjan on August 04, 2011, 01:11:16 PM
I don't buy this one; ever-virgin is a core attribute for Valkyries.
Not if you believe Gard in Heoroth. But I see nothing of Gard in Fitz description.
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: ImpishMortal on August 04, 2011, 01:21:53 PM
You'll have to forgive me I didn't read all the comments so I hope I am not repeating something.

Serack, some questions for you if you can answer them.

Do you think Fitz will be able to control the change (or be trained to control it) or have his human consciousness afterward? 
Does he have a soul or some mixed hybrid of one?
Would this explain why he was able to hear Harry?

Sure, I'm not Serack. But I think I can address some of your questions.
Wolves are all over mythology for several cultures -  sometimes good, sometimes evil. In many cases, especially that of Native American lore, they are somehow linked to the supernatural. Based on Jim's use of mythology and folklorem I think Fitz's ability to perceive things beyond the natural world could be attributed to his wolf heritage (should he turn out to be Tera's son).
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: Quantus on August 04, 2011, 01:23:55 PM
I  choose to believe that any supernatural being that implies something rather than stating it outright is covering for not directly stating it.

The more obvious the implication, the more I believe this.  Because you can't go around sticking "legend has it" before every time you might possibly want an ambiguity.
lol, I think there are clinical terms for that.  Maybe even medications  ;)
In seriousness though, the other explanation is that they talk like real, normal people and not like they are on a witness stand where every syllable is going to be dissected for hidden meaning and binding literalism.  We tend to dissect a bit too much, due mostly to an everpresent gnawing addiction that no amount of text seems able to satisfy, but the characters don't no that.  With supernatural beings like the Sidhe, who are bound to tell no direct lie, but famous for twisting around it, I might agree with you.  But not every character, supernatural or otherwise, is that focused on it.   :)
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: Dina on August 04, 2011, 01:58:18 PM
"He [Bob] looked . . . quite ordinary, really. Tall, but not outrageously so; slender without being rail thin. He had decent shoulders and looked sort of familiar. He was dressed like James Dean—jeans, a white shirt, a leather biker’s jacket."  I wonder who Bob looks like, why he looks familiar.  Or is it tied in with the following:
“There’s the Bob I know and love,” I said. “Love, ick,” he replied. “And I am and I’m not. I mean, you get that I change based on who possesses the skull, right?” “Sure,” I said. “So I’m a lot like I was with you, even though I’m with Butters, because he met me back then. First impression and whatnot, highly important.”  Perhaps Bob's appearance is the amalgamation of past and present owners.

In other part Harry said he looked like Butters, so I guess the familiarity comes from there. I don't think Bob can have children.
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: Serack on August 04, 2011, 02:25:06 PM
You'll have to forgive me I didn't read all the comments so I hope I am not repeating something.

Serack, some questions for you if you can answer them.

I can only answer with my impressions.  Until I hear Jim say something at least.

Do you think Fitz will be able to control the change (or be trained to control it) or have his human consciousness afterward? 

I've already put some thought into this one, and I think that might be quite likely, although knowing how Jim treats Harry, he's going to get smacked around a bit before that can happen.

Does he have a soul or some mixed hybrid of one?

*raises eyebrows*  That is a good question...  Hmmm...  The closest thing to a scion we have seen soulgazed is Thomas I think, and that doesn't give us much of a precident imo...  I'd love to ask Jim, "If Fritz has his mother's eyes, can he be soulgazed?"  Maybe it should be "Can a scion of a wolf and a Loup Garou be soulgazed?"

Edit:  I'm pretty sure Harry has stated a few times how he wasn't worried about soulgazing a fae, and I think he made similar comments about the rampires... What other beings can he not soulgaze with?

Would this explain why he was able to hear Harry?

I'm using this as part of my argument for explaining his parentage, so yah I think that is very likely.  Stuart did say that 1 in 10 dogs can sense spirits.
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: the neurovore of Zur-En-Aargh on August 04, 2011, 02:30:07 PM
Not if you believe Gard in Heoroth.

I believe if Gard had meant to deny that outright she'd have denied it outright, and coy implications are not an outright denial.
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: ImpishMortal on August 04, 2011, 02:41:07 PM
I'm using this as part of my argument for explaining his parentage, so yah I think that is very likely.  Stuart did say that 1 in 10 dogs can sense spirits.

But nothing of wolves, eh?  ;)

Methinks all of them can sense spirits.
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: Bones on August 04, 2011, 02:54:08 PM
I believe if Gard had meant to deny that outright she'd have denied it outright, and coy implications are not an outright denial.

But they're so much more interesting to read.  :)
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: the neurovore of Zur-En-Aargh on August 04, 2011, 03:38:44 PM
In seriousness though, the other explanation is that they talk like real, normal people and not like they are on a witness stand where every syllable is going to be dissected for hidden meaning and binding literalism.

If you want to think centuries-old nonhuman beings are "like real normal people", then you seem to me to be open to be played.  The vampires, the Faerie, the angels, everybody takes advantage of Harry making that assumption left right and centre.
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: habu987 on August 04, 2011, 03:47:33 PM
I believe if Gard had meant to deny that outright she'd have denied it outright, and coy implications are not an outright denial.

But is her outright denial of denying it outright and usage of coy implications an outright denial of the supposition that our lore is the same lore that is in the DV, or would that be an outright denial that the lore is different?  ;D

*My head hurts*
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: the neurovore of Zur-En-Aargh on August 04, 2011, 03:52:10 PM
But is her outright denial of denying it outright and usage of coy implications an outright denial of the supposition that our lore is the same lore that is in the DV, or would that be an outright denial that the lore is different?  ;D

I'm operating on the basis that the DV is the same as our world, or our world's lore, unless actively shown otherwise.
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: habu987 on August 04, 2011, 03:58:38 PM
I'm operating on the basis that the DV is the same as our world, or our world's lore, unless actively shown otherwise.

Well, we already know that the WG is around at the same time that other gods, such as Odin, are hanging around, so there is at least some difference in the lore. 

That train of thought starts bringing in real world stuff, and the potential for veering into TT area, so I'll cut my point off at that.
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: Jared on August 04, 2011, 05:06:33 PM
Well, we already know that the WG is around at the same time that other gods, such as Odin, are hanging around, so there is at least some difference in the lore.

Not sure what you mean. There are people (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asatru#Odinism) that worship Odin today.
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: the neurovore of Zur-En-Aargh on August 04, 2011, 05:29:22 PM
Not sure what you mean. There are people (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asatru#Odinism) that worship Odin today.

Yes, I know a few.

My point is that, from my admittedly limited discussions with some of those people, contemporary Asatru do not have it as a core component of their faith that other gods are false, while other gods being a priori false is a regular component of at least such bits of contemporary Christianity as i am familiar with.  (I had a Catholic schooling.)

Therefore, what Jim is doing in the DV is a fictional universe in which we have, thus far, seen one of the core cosmological axioms of Christianity been demonstrated to be untrue, and we have not seen anything similar with regard to the Aesir.

Therefore, it seems logical to me that there are grounds for considering it plausible that other axioms of Christianity might turn out untrue in the DV (to wit, the possibility that archangels lie) in ways there are not grounds for considering it plausible that axioms of other belief systems might turn out untrue (to wit, ever-virgin Valkyries.)  Jim seems to me to be treating the two mythoi on different scales.
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: FFguy on August 04, 2011, 05:33:39 PM
thank you for the answers Serack.

I am re-listening to the audio book now that I can focus on the finer details and not wanting to just get to the end :) .  Very good catch.  I have been waiting for Butcher to bring Tara back into the story.  She was too cool of a character to leave out in the long run.
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: Jared on August 04, 2011, 05:42:55 PM
My point is that, from my admittedly limited discussions with some of those people, contemporary Asatru do not have it as a core component of their faith that other gods are false, while other gods being a priori false is a regular component of at least such bits of contemporary Christianity as i am familiar with.  (I had a Catholic schooling.)

I understood, I was just pointing out to the other person that they were incorrect about today's RL lore not having Odin around. As another note to that, for the DV, it doesn't matter whether the lore is believed today, but whether it had been believed at all. I think Harry and/or told us that the old gods that no one believes go into the NN and dwindle. So Enki's probably running around in there. [If there are people that still hold to Sumerian beliefs today, just replace Enki with some placeholder deity that no one worships anymore.]


I do think, however, that if fae really truly can not lie (not sure if you've expressed doubt about that before), but let people believe things that are untrue, then it's not really consistent to say that the WG lets modern Christians believe that he's the only god, so he's lying.
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: the neurovore of Zur-En-Aargh on August 04, 2011, 05:54:39 PM
I think Harry and/or told us that the old gods that no one believes go into the NN and dwindle. So Enki's probably running around in there. [If there are people that still hold to Sumerian beliefs today, just replace Enki with some placeholder deity that no one worships anymore.]

Harry's told us that the old gods are in the NN and mostly dormant, in PG.  I think there's room for a serious grain of salt in how much that depends on human belief; partly because we have seen since that Odin for one is pretty active and I'm not seeing reason to suspect the DV having a large contingent of Asatru running around, partly because I'm not finding it easy to believe that if human faith is the principal power source for DV deities that the Hindu gods would not be active, but Harry lists them among the ones in the NN/dormant state, and partly because the minor Classical deity in the poisoned-beer story in Side Jobs seems to think the older gods were actively kicked out. 

I suspect that there may have been some single major event or spell or something that sent those other gods out into the NN and keeps them there.  I am tempted to suspect that of correlation with the coming of the Swords and the Denarians into the world.

Quote
I do think, however, that if fae really truly can not lie (not sure if you've expressed doubt about that before), but let people believe things that are untrue, then it's not really consistent to say that the WG lets modern Christians believe that he's the only god, so he's lying.

The difference there, fwiw, is that the Fae are not espousing a morality in which bearing false witness in all its forms is a bad thing.  The Fae are not doing something that is on their own moral terms wrong; the WG would seem to be.
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: Arkham8 on August 04, 2011, 08:02:56 PM
New thoughts. Must revise theory....child of Hendricks....

and
(click to show/hide)
. By cloning. Kind of like that one Super-boy is the child of Lex and Super-man  ::)
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: Jared on August 04, 2011, 08:17:57 PM
The difference there, fwiw, is that the Fae are not espousing a morality in which bearing false witness in all its forms is a bad thing.  The Fae are not doing something that is on their own moral terms wrong; the WG would seem to be.

Where are you getting their moral terms from? Everything that I've seen Uriel say says that the WG doesn't enforce actions, people must have their own free will to choose for themselves. If the WG puts out the Bible that says "There are other gods, I'm just the best." and Christians choose to ignore those passages, how is that immoral by the WG morals that have been stated in the books?
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: the neurovore of Zur-En-Aargh on August 04, 2011, 08:40:43 PM
Where are you getting their moral terms from?

At risk of crossing threads, the Ten Commandments, particularly in this case the one about not bearing false witness.
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: Jared on August 04, 2011, 08:47:59 PM
At risk of crossing threads, the Ten Commandments, particularly in this case the one about not bearing false witness.

I think the point of disagreement here is your take on lies of omission. I disagree with that stance.

I don't think there's much to be done beyond agree to disagree here.
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: Serack on August 05, 2011, 01:22:31 AM
By the way, Jim said in the past week (I think it was at the NYC signing) that Uriel can't lie.  Well he can't unless he really changes his affiliations.
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: Vairelome on August 05, 2011, 01:43:06 AM
Bob mentions Archangels as being on the list of entities with full Intellectus.  If you combine that with the WoJ above, that Uriel can't lie (I'd more or less assumed that was true), you've got a difficult character to write--one whose every statement MUST accurately reflect the Dresdenverse as it actually is.

Note that Uriel's dismay over Jack's "three people Harry loves" lie is not a counter-example, due to the distinction between Intellectus and true omniscience.  Uriel had not previously considered that Jack might have lied to Harry, so he didn't know it had happened.  Intellectus requires that a question be brought to the mind of the entity in order for the answer to arrive with it.  True omniscience wouldn't require that (in theory, since it hasn't come up yet in the Dresdenverse).

I don't think it's possible for Uriel to make a statement literally without thinking about it first.  This would mean that Uriel knows with certainty the truth value of his every statement (Intellectus), and that the truth value is always positive (he can't lie).
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: Hopefire on August 05, 2011, 01:48:28 AM
I remain of the opinion that the White God is a different type of being than the other gods of the Dresdenverse. My theory is that the other gods are either a) similar in nature to gods in Neil Gaiman stories (they exist because humanity believes in them), or b) they're massively powerful beings that people are worshiping for one reason or another (the Red Court's leaders would be examples of this). I think that the White God is technically an Outsider, and the Dresdenverse is his realm.

I think that it says something that the White God has at least four - and perhaps once five - Archangels following him who seem to be more powerful than even heavy hitters like Mab.

Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: Serack on August 05, 2011, 01:55:49 AM
Bob mentions Archangels as being on the list of entities with full Intellectus.  If you combine that with the WoJ above, that Uriel can't lie (I'd more or less assumed that was true), you've got a difficult character to write--one whose every statement MUST accurately reflect the Dresdenverse as it actually is.

Note that Uriel's dismay over Jack's "three people Harry loves" lie is not a counter-example, due to the distinction between Intellectus and true omniscience.  Uriel had not previously considered that Jack might have lied to Harry, so he didn't know it had happened.  Intellectus requires that a question be brought to the mind of the entity in order for the answer to arrive with it.  True omniscience wouldn't require that (in theory, since it hasn't come up yet in the Dresdenverse).

I don't think it's possible for Uriel to make a statement literally without thinking about it first.  This would mean that Uriel knows with certainty the truth value of his every statement (Intellectus), and that the truth value is always positive (he can't lie).

This does a very good job of articulating my opinions on the matter.  Thanks
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: Fyrchick on August 05, 2011, 02:01:30 AM

 ???
Perhaps a new thread is in order since the whole WG/Uriel/lying issue is not really on topic?

So I was intrigued by the idea of a child of Tera and MacFinn. I found (or didn't find) 3 things that I had questions about.

The first is a description of MacFinn. I couldn't find anything that mentions red hair. I did a quick search of the text but didn't find anything. Does someone have more patience to find this?

The second is about Tera giving up a child. This may or may not refer to a son, but it sort of answers a question about Tera's motivations.

"Who are you?" I asked her finally.
"One who has lost too many of her family already," she said.
(Fool Moon Ch.26)

The last thing is the mechanics of the curse. According to Chauncy, the curse had 2 components. It was hereditary, passing to someone new "each and every generation" AND that the cursed line of the family would "never, ever die out lasting until the end of days."

Is is a congenital curse or a traveling one? Meaning, is the next curse-ee "chosen" at birth or does it travel when the current curse-ee dies? Did MacFinn have any siblings or other family?
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: Vairelome on August 05, 2011, 03:25:51 AM
Ah, yes, back on topic.

For reference, here's Harry's description of MacFinn (Fool Moon, Ch. 15):
Quote
I studied the man a little more closely.  He was big.  He was really big, at least as tall as me and twice as broad.  He was dressed only in a pair of cutoff blue jeans, and those looked like they were ill fit.  He was in a condition best described as "overwhelmingly masculine," hairy-chested and muscled like a professional wrestler.  There was grey in his hair and beard, and there were lines on his face, putting his age at well into maturity.  It was his eyes that showed me the most about him.  They burned green, wild and haunted, fastened on the distant sky now, but heavy with the weight of too much terrible knowledge.  It couldn't have been easy to live with a curse like his.

As far as hair color goes, all it says is "grey in his hair and beard."  From the phrasing, I'd say some base color streaked or speckled with grey, rather than full grey.  Logically, he's not likely to be blond, since Harry wouldn't likely notice a contrast between grey and blond at night in the woods, even with a full moon.  Red is a possibility, but not indicated either way.

I checked the pelt coloration of the loup-garou, later in the book (Fool Moon, Ch. 17):
Quote
Its pelt was shaggy, jet-black and matte, except where fresh blood was making it glisten.

You might take from that quote that MacFinn's base hair color was black, though the fact that the loup-garou's pelt was not streaked with grey leaves the question open enough to be debatable, in my opinion.

As far as the curse mechanics go, my guess would be that the curse travels when the current curse-ee dies, but lies dormant if the new recipient is not above a certain age.  I don't really have textual evidence to back that up, beyond MacFinn's Vietnam experience (which, now that I look it up, is more ambivalent on a point than I'd thought).  From Fool Moon, Ch. 15 (emphasis mine):
Quote
He nodded.  "It's how I came back from 'Nam.  Everyone else in my platoon died but me.  I knew the full moon was coming.  And I knew that I hated them, hated the soldiers who had killed my friends.  When I changed, I started killing until there wasn't anyone left alive within maybe two miles."

I thought I'd read the assumption that MacFinn's change in Vietnam was his first change.  Based on the text, I'm not sure.  The sentence I put in bold seems to state flat-out that MacFinn at least knew the change was coming, whether or not it was the first, which is a difficult point.  If MacFinn had any idea what the curse would do to him, I think joining the military was a ludicrously poor decision.  Basic training lasts longer than a month, I believe--it's not like you can guarantee your own schedule to have monthly 3-day vacations like clockwork.

If the MacFinn/Tera West theory is true, I seriously hope one of the good guys figures it out before the poor kid's first change.
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: Bones on August 05, 2011, 04:00:19 AM
If MacFinn is Celtic it's highly likely he has some redhead in his genetics. It doesn't matter what his hair color is, his son could easily be a redhead. My husband has red hair and neither of his parents do.
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: Fyrchick on August 05, 2011, 04:17:46 AM
If MacFinn is Celtic it's highly likely he has some redhead in his genetics. It doesn't matter what his hair color is, his son could easily be a redhead. My husband has red hair and neither of his parents do.

True. But its seems when Jim takes time to be as specific about a description it's always worth taking into consideration. In this case I think it's a deliberate clue or deliberate red herring (so to speak.) If we take genetics into account just about anyone could be the father. There is red hair in Mongolia and Italy... it's an easier stretch with MacFinn being Irish and all that, but I think we need to look for possibilities in the characters already presented with red hair.

Perhaps Murphy had a kid she didn't tell anyone about (nose) or Agent Harris fathered a kid someplace.

I've been trying to remember who else has red hair. (Other than Agent Harris in Fool Moon.) What about his skin color? Anyone else described that way?
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: Bones on August 05, 2011, 05:05:56 AM
I seem to be terrible with hair colors. I always thought Butters had reddish hair when he was introduced. And Morgan had auburn hair mixed in with the gray. So I can't be relied upon to remember most characters' hair color unless it's mentioned several times. Murphy's a blond, right?  ;)

Another source of the Native-American coloring could be Listens To Wind, though.

As for MacFinn and the hair color being a strong hint, I still think Tera West's coloring and eye description plus the fact that MacFinn was Irish might be enough to cover Fitz's description. MacFinn's description doesn't really lend itself to any real specifics except the green eyes, I think.
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: Thork on August 05, 2011, 12:46:51 PM

My point is that, from my admittedly limited discussions with some of those people, contemporary Asatru do not have it as a core component of their faith that other gods are false, while other gods being a priori false is a regular component of at least such bits of contemporary Christianity as i am familiar with.  (I had a Catholic schooling.)

Therefore, what Jim is doing in the DV is a fictional universe in which we have, thus far, seen one of the core cosmological axioms of Christianity been demonstrated to be untrue, and we have not seen anything similar with regard to the Aesir.

Well, all depends on which particular branch of Christianity you're talking about. Get gnostic enough and just about anything's possible.  Beyond that though, there's a difference between "false gods" in the sense of "gods who exist, but are not God" vs. "false gods who do not exist." It's certainly possible to read the Bible as stating that other gods exist, you're just not supposed to worship them, because they aren't the one true overarching universal Capital-G God.
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: raidem on August 05, 2011, 12:56:17 PM
I found another candidate who had a dark complexion...
The first woman we'd seen enter the apartment faced me.  She had a dark complexion, dark eyes, short, dark straight hair that made me think she might have had some Native Americans in the family a generation or three back.  She was maybe five foot four, late thirties.  She had a serious kind of face, with faint pensive lines between her brows, and from the way she stood, blocking the doorway with solidly planted feet, I got the impression that she could be a bulldog when necessary.  "No one here has broken any of the Laws, Warden,"  she said in a quiet voice.  "Gosh, that's a relief," I said.  "Anna Ash?"
Anna was a member of the Ordo Lebes who had hired Elaine to protect them from the killer in White Night.  She later was found dead, killed by "Priscilla" or the Skavis white vampire.   One thing that seems to eliminate her as a candidate though is that Elaine says "Some of them didn't have any dependents.  Like Anna."  She states this in response to Harry informing her that he had gotten reparations out of the White Court.  A were gild for their dependents."  Harry and Elaine then use reparations for Anna to build the Paranet.
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: Arjan on August 05, 2011, 02:00:14 PM
I believe if Gard had meant to deny that outright she'd have denied it outright, and coy implications are not an outright denial.
This is typically a subject where you can not really expect outright answers because other answers are a lot more fun and outright answers make it a lot more serious.  But I think her reaction quite convincing.

Besides I have read WOJ somewhere when asked if Gard was with Hendriks he answered that Hendriks was with Gard.

http://www.jimbutcheronline.com/bb/index.php/topic,12157.msg535056.html#msg535056

Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: sgt_majorette on August 05, 2011, 03:06:36 PM
...If the MacFinn/Tera West theory is true, I seriously hope one of the good guys figures it out before the poor kid's first change.
Or maybe he can't change and that's why Tera had to drop him off in human society. Maybe she had him taken to Chicago in hopes that Dreden or one of his allies would find him.
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: Serack on August 05, 2011, 03:09:34 PM
This is typically a subject where you can not really expect outright answers because other answers are a lot more fun and outright answers make it a lot more serious.  But I think her reaction quite convincing.

Besides I have read WOJ somewhere when asked if Gard was with Hendriks he answered that Hendriks was with Gard.

http://www.jimbutcheronline.com/bb/index.php/topic,12157.msg535056.html#msg535056

If what I said in Reply #86 wasn't clear enough, I'll reiterate.

Please don't allow this subject to continue to hijack the thread.

If the MacFinn/Tera West theory is true, I seriously hope one of the good guys figures it out before the poor kid's first change.

Given the series track record, I suspect that Harry's ignorance of this is going to cause him pain somehow.
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: raidem on August 08, 2011, 12:05:19 PM
Hmm, I was just thinking perhaps Ivy and Fitz, allegedly the descendant of MacFinn, will get together at some point and procreate.  The MacFinn's curse lasts until the end of days and the Archive's purpose is to last after some said calamity to help civilization rebuild.  Descendants of Fitz, if allegation is true, and Ivy would give greater likelihood that Archive would survive until appointed time.  Alternatively, it would be satisfying if Maggie and Fitz got together, we could surmise that Harry's line doesn't die out.
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: jeno on August 08, 2011, 02:06:49 PM
Fitz is ten years older than Maggie.  ???
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: raidem on August 08, 2011, 02:34:23 PM
Well, perhaps in like 15 years or so.
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: badassassin on August 10, 2011, 07:50:25 AM
since tera is a wolf were, (although really, if being human and going wolf is were-wolf, shouldn't the opposite be were-human?) wouldn't it be likely that she gave birth as a wolf? why would she be human during that? also, if that is true, fitz would know about it, and why wouldn't you turn into a wolf to fight a human? a smart wolf could have taken aristedes easily. and lastly, i never thought tera was all that powerful. to play the wolf card again is kinda to just bring billy back. we have a wolf hero in the df already, quite a few actually. why another? and what use is that? even though billy is an adult wolf, harry would easily beat him. fitz should almost definitely be able to contribute majorly in the Bat. I'm gonna opine a nay to the tera west theory, and shoot in a more wizardly direction. or sotc. or both.
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: badassassin on August 10, 2011, 07:54:31 AM
sorry, little add on. if the bloodline dies, is it another distant relative of the family? or does some random joe schmo get this curse?
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: Arkham8 on August 10, 2011, 03:32:01 PM
sorry, little add on. if the bloodline dies, is it another distant relative of the family? or does some random joe schmo get this curse?
Probably the next most Irish person in the vicinity.
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: the neurovore of Zur-En-Aargh on August 10, 2011, 03:47:54 PM
Probably the next most Irish person in the vicinity.

Oh dear. Unless we have any other Irish citizens posting here, that would be me.
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: polkaneverdies on August 10, 2011, 05:16:11 PM
Let us know how the full moon goes for you neuro. It might clue us in whether serack's theory has already been disproved.
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: dagaetch on August 10, 2011, 06:48:50 PM
For what it's worth, from the Bitten with Books chat:
Quote
Will we be seeing more of Fitz in the future books?
I think it’s unlikely, but who knows. Supporting character have surprised me before.

Jim's often dodgy with answers but this seems pretty straightforward. No smiley face or anything!
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: habu987 on August 10, 2011, 06:59:44 PM
For what it's worth, from the Bitten with Books chat:
Jim's often dodgy with answers but this seems pretty straightforward. No smiley face or anything!

Right.  If that's the case, I think that kinda torpedoes this whole thread...
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: badassassin on August 10, 2011, 08:55:35 PM
no. just like polka, i say fitz will never die
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: Sm0kEyNy on September 07, 2011, 02:41:17 AM
Ignore this jus posting to mark this thread for later reading an speculation
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: jeno on September 07, 2011, 10:36:18 AM
Better do that quick then, old threads now get purged after a certain amount of time.
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: Warden John Marcone on September 08, 2011, 09:32:08 PM
It's been a number of years since I've read Fool Moon so I may be wrong about this (personal preference, I find the second book in a series, any series to be exceptionally poor compared to 1 and 3).  This is also working from the theory that Fitz is Tera/MacFinn's child and apologies if this has been addressed, tl:dr thread with too many derailments.

First, from what I know of wolves, the pups don't hang around forever.  Once they're about a year(ish) old they strike off on their own, so maybe Fitz is on his own because it was that time for him.  Sure, Tera's not an ordinary wolf, but she IS still a wolf, and if Fitz was raised in both worlds it's possible the wolf part understands and is ready but the human isn't mature enough to survive alone.  Second, because of the blood mix, Fitz is still going to get whammied with the curse, but because he is part wolf, he'll be more (forgive the terminology and think Underworld) Lycan than Loup-Garou, able to control himself as the ravening beast.  And finally, isn't it mentioned somewhere that the curse doesn't kick in until age 21?  So if Fitz is only 15 he's got a few more years of "freedom".

Make of it what you will, and correct me if I'm wrong or beating a dead wolf.
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: Mira on September 08, 2011, 10:23:41 PM

  Okay, I am late to this thread, yeah, Fitz means bastard..  Jim says he is cursed?  He also says that he most likely won't use him anymore as a character?  Huh? ???

Don't buy that, but where did all the wolf speculation come from?  There are all kinds of curses.
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: Warden John Marcone on September 08, 2011, 11:40:12 PM
The wolf speculation comes from:
A) Tera West was supposed to be in GS
B) A lot was done through proxies
C) MacFinn's curse can't die, but he didn't have a kid (that we knew of)
D) Fitz's skin was dark, almost bronze, like native american dark
E) Fitz's hair was red, like an Irishman's
F) Fitz's eyes are roughly the color of Tera West's
G) Fitz is Cursed

Taken together, it seems to point to Fitz being the result of Tera West and Harley MacFinn
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: Mira on September 09, 2011, 02:20:56 AM
The wolf speculation comes from:
A) Tera West was supposed to be in GS
B) A lot was done through proxies
C) MacFinn's curse can't die, but he didn't have a kid (that we knew of)
D) Fitz's skin was dark, almost bronze, like native american dark
E) Fitz's hair was red, like an Irishman's
F) Fitz's eyes are roughly the color of Tera West's
G) Fitz is Cursed

Taken together, it seems to point to Fitz being the result of Tera West and Harley MacFinn
But Tera West wasn't in Ghost Story, or at least I do not remember reading about her.
 Yeah, but the  proxies mentioned where Mab, Lea, Demonreach, maybe Uriel.  Nothing mentioned about Tera West.
 If MacFinn died, then either his nearest relative caught it, God wouldn't that be terrible?  Or the curse died with him.  The curse was on his family, when his family died it would die with them.  No evidence that Terra West had a litter of puppies.
 Fitz's skin is dark.. Well, he could be Hispanic, Italian, half AfroAmerican, Middle Eastern, Micronesian, and any other combination that produces darker skin, East Indian...
 Fitz's hair is red like an Irishman.. There are red haired people in my family, we are Danish.  There is a famous Viking named Eric the Red, because of his red hair, lots of Englishmen have red hair. 
 His eyes are roughly the color of Tera West's?  Lots of people have that eye color.
 Fitz is cursed.. Okay, WOJ on that one, but he also said Fitz in more books not likely.. So why say anything at all?  However there are more curses under the sun than you can shake a stick at, stay tuned.. You could be right, or just jumping to conclusions.
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: Vairelome on September 09, 2011, 03:22:58 AM
His eyes are roughly the color of Tera West's?  Lots of people have that eye color.

Lots of people in the Dresden Files are specifically described as having golden eyes?  Both Tera West and Fitz are.

Also, one of the conditions of the Loup-Garou curse was that MacFinn's line would not die out until the End of Days.

There are a number of thematic links that make the association quite plausible, beyond the list of associations WJM listed.  Fitz' behavior, both with Baldy and the group of kids in his gang, has strong overtones of the stereotypical "how a wolf in human skin would act."
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: Warden John Marcone on September 09, 2011, 04:55:25 AM
But Tera West wasn't in Ghost Story, or at least I do not remember reading about her.
 Yeah, but the  proxies mentioned where Mab, Lea, Demonreach, maybe Uriel.  Nothing mentioned about Tera West.

No, Tera West wasn't in GS, but if somebody has a complete list of all the proxies that appeared in GS I'd like to see it.  Yes, Mab and Demonreach had obvious proxies, but I sincerely doubt they were the only ones.  I think it's possible, and even probable, that Fitz was a proxy for somebody.  As Tera was SUPPOSED to be in GS, per WoJ, I think it's a fair guess as any, and the theory I'm going with.

If MacFinn died, then either his nearest relative caught it, God wouldn't that be terrible?  Or the curse died with him.  The curse was on his family, when his family died it would die with them.  No evidence that Terra West had a litter of puppies.

MacFinn did die, and his curse passed on, but correct me if I'm wrong but there's a difference between Families and Lines.  A Family can branch out and expand, but a Line is one straight thread, and MacFinn's line can't die out according the the legend.  Also, pragmatism now enters my wild guessing.  If I was cursed to become a monster, and I HAD to pass it on, I'd make DAMN sure I forced that on as few people as possible, so it's plausible that he didn't HAVE any relatives, due to his father, grandfather, etc, only having one child each.  Besides, there was no evidence that Harry had a child either, until Changes.  Only a romantic scene between Harry and Susan.  So no, there's no evidence Tera had pups/cubs/babies/children, but there's plenty to imply it, starting with the curse that says the line won't end.

Fitz's skin is dark.. Well, he could be Hispanic, Italian, half AfroAmerican, Middle Eastern, Micronesian, and any other combination that produces darker skin, East Indian...
 Fitz's hair is red like an Irishman.. There are red haired people in my family, we are Danish.  There is a famous Viking named Eric the Red, because of his red hair, lots of Englishmen have red hair.
His eyes are roughly the color of Tera West's?  Lots of people have that eye color.

Ah, yes, Eric the Red, pilager extrordinare, father of Lief Ericson who discovered Greenland, if I remember right.
I'll need to double-check, but I think it's stated that Fitz's skin Native American dark, which is distinctive from Indian, Hispanic, and the like.
Yes, red hair is very common among the Scandinavians, but they settled in Ireland, Scotland, etc, and today it's seen as a distinctive Irish feature.
Yes, many have that eye color, butonly two are explicitly stated to have that eye color.
Jim's a lazy writer, as he's stated multiple times, so if he gives details like that, it's the sort of thing to take at face value.

Fitz is cursed.. Okay, WOJ on that one, but he also said Fitz in more books not likely.. So why say anything at all?  However there are more curses under the sun than you can shake a stick at, stay tuned.. You could be right, or just jumping to conclusions.

True, I could be jumping to conclusions, but Butters was also supposed to be a one-shot character, and look how that turned out.  Vince Graver from TC was a one shot, there was TONS of speculation about him.  I've seen three references to Chauncy in this thread alone, and he was a one shot from ages ago.  Why say anything about him?  Because it's fun.  And as to the curses, I think Sir Stu said dogs could see and hear ghosts, so maybe a half-wolf could only  get half the gift, in this case hearing only.
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: Dina on September 09, 2011, 05:18:59 AM
It says: "He was youthfully scrawned, his skin bronze enough to look Native American, though his tangled red hair and pug nose argued otherwise. His eyes were an odd shade of brown, so light as to be nearly golden"

I think one of the reasons that WJM mentioned is quite unconclusive, but all of them together made a solid case (I am not saying is 100% sure, only that it is VERY probable)
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: Mira on September 09, 2011, 05:48:24 AM
It says: "He was youthfully scrawned, his skin bronze enough to look Native American, though his tangled red hair and pug nose argued otherwise. His eyes were an odd shade of brown, so light as to be nearly golden"

I think one of the reasons that WJM mentioned is quite unconclusive, but all of them together made a solid case (I am not saying is 100% sure, only that it is VERY probable)
Maybe Dina, but why go to all that trouble and then say he most likely not be in any of the future books? Also one more thought, you'd think that Terra West would have done a better job of raising her pup.  If he was raised in the Pacific Northwest, raised with the care and wisdom his mother had, what was he doing a stray dog orphan subjugated to a second rate sorcerer bully?  One more thing, if he was turning into a Loup every full moon, how come a lot of torn up bodies didn't turn up in Chicago? Heck all those kids, the second rate sorcerer himself?  Harry didn't mention seeing any fancy magic circle, the kind that would be needed to contain a Loop.  That's where I have a problem, it is easy to jump to conclusions based on his description and the fact that Jim said he was cursed, but when you think about it, it doesn't add up, at least to me it doesn't.
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: Vairelome on September 09, 2011, 06:45:35 AM
Fitz may well be too young to have had his first transformation.  It would be entirely in-genre for such curses to remain inactive "until his 18th birthday"...or 16th, or 21st, or whatever is particularly significant.  As far as Tera West's possibly unconventional parenting style, it's worth remembering that she isn't human, and lost her mate, who was human, several years ago.

One thing to remember is, according to the curse, it's almost certain that West and MacFinn had a child.  Since we know that they never married before MacFinn's death, that child would be a bastard.  Fitz means bastard.  He has physical characteristics that resemble Tera West and MacFinn, acts in a semi-wolfish sort of way socially, and we apparently have a WoJ that Fitz is cursed.  These are rather a lot of factors to dismiss in order to claim it's a coincidence.

I realize JB's also said that he had no plans to use Fitz as a character again, but you never know.  That doesn't contradict any of the above; it could mean that JB doesn't plan to bring the Loup-Garou curse back into the plotline.  This makes sense--the Loup-Garou curse was covered in FM, and if it originated from Saint Patrick (who was a bloody idiot, if so), then it doesn't seem to be an integral part of the long-term plotline.
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: PirateJack on September 09, 2011, 08:48:43 AM
Besides, Jim's world doesn't solely revolve around Harry. Well, it does, but other people have their own stories too.

Carlos' family has a restaurant and the White Court don't have many operations in LA. Morgan had his love for Luccio. Ebenezar has a truck load of stories mentioned in passing attributed to him. Hell, half of the Alphas left to go do their own thing rather than stay in Chicago to play protector to the city.
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: Mira on September 09, 2011, 11:52:43 AM
Fitz may well be too young to have had his first transformation.  It would be entirely in-genre for such curses to remain inactive "until his 18th birthday"...or 16th, or 21st, or whatever is particularly significant.  As far as Tera West's possibly unconventional parenting style, it's worth remembering that she isn't human, and lost her mate, who was human, several years ago.

One thing to remember is, according to the curse, it's almost certain that West and MacFinn had a child.  Since we know that they never married before MacFinn's death, that child would be a bastard.  Fitz means bastard.  He has physical characteristics that resemble Tera West and MacFinn, acts in a semi-wolfish sort of way socially, and we apparently have a WoJ that Fitz is cursed.  These are rather a lot of factors to dismiss in order to claim it's a coincidence.

I realize JB's also said that he had no plans to use Fitz as a character again, but you never know.  That doesn't contradict any of the above; it could mean that JB doesn't plan to bring the Loup-Garou curse back into the plotline.  This makes sense--the Loup-Garou curse was covered in FM, and if it originated from Saint Patrick (who was a bloody idiot, if so), then it doesn't seem to be an integral part of the long-term plotline.

Okay, but wouldTera conceive as a human or a wolf?  Have one child or a litter of pups?  Yes, Fitz means bastard, but people have names like Fitzgerald and they are not bastards, an ancestor was.  Surely Fitz knows what is coming if he is indeed her son, yet how long is he going to stick around those kids?  I mean can you see Zero leaving him?
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: Quantus on September 09, 2011, 12:28:48 PM
Besides, Jim's world doesn't solely revolve around Harry. Well, it does, but other people have their own stories too.

Carlos' family has a restaurant and the White Court don't have many operations in LA. Morgan had his love for Luccio. Ebenezar has a truck load of stories mentioned in passing attributed to him. Hell, half of the Alphas left to go do their own thing rather than stay in Chicago to play protector to the city.
Jim has said he has "a whole stable" of support characters, many of which may never get into the books.  Hell, Klaus the Toymaker was only mentioned in passing back in SK, but he apparently has a whole backstory from WWII. 
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: Gman on September 09, 2011, 12:33:37 PM
Okay, but wouldTera conceive as a human or a wolf?  Have one child or a litter of pups?  Yes, Fitz means bastard, but people have names like Fitzgerald and they are not bastards, an ancestor was.  Surely Fitz knows what is coming if he is indeed her son, yet how long is he going to stick around those kids?  I mean can you see Zero leaving him?

Some interesting conjecture. Indeed, Fitz's name may have significance or it may just be someone naming him that because it sounded nice to them. Hopefully we will learn something in the next book. I have no idea what form a baby from a human and non human comes out. I think it may vary, some human looking and some the non human parent looking and some somewhere in between. I think Fix may be a scion of a human and non human. He seemed to be more mind magic resistant than normal besides the being able to hear Harry and the unusual eyes. Hopefully Zero wasn't named that because he is worthless. ;)
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: Mira on September 09, 2011, 01:16:20 PM
Some interesting conjecture. Indeed, Fitz's name may have significance or it may just be someone naming him that because it sounded nice to them. Hopefully we will learn something in the next book. I have no idea what form a baby from a human and non human comes out. I think it may vary, some human looking and some the non human parent looking and some somewhere in between. I think Fix may be a scion of a human and non human. He seemed to be more mind magic resistant than normal besides the being able to hear Harry and the unusual eyes. Hopefully Zero wasn't named that because he is worthless. ;)
Yeah, we have no evidence that either Tara West or MacFadden could hear or see ghosts, but that doesn't mean that they couldn't.  I got the impression that Tara West was much more inclined to the wolf side than her "human side," so if Fitz is a son, he may have several bothers and sisters also under the curse.
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: Dina on September 09, 2011, 02:22:37 PM
I think the curse is only for one person and if McFinn died wirhout a child, his closer relative will inherit it.
Mira, we discussed the idea of why Tera would abandon his child or something like that in the fist pages of this thread. I agree that Tera would have done a good job, but we don't know the circumstances. Perhaps McFinn didn't want a child (because of the curse) so she never told him she was pregnant and she left the baby with her lupine family. Then, remember she said she has lost many of her family. Perhaps she thought her puppy had died, but he was playing Mowgli in the forest. Who knows?

I always found very rare the WoJ about not planning to use Fitz. He has been too well described and he was left so open (we still don't know why he heard ghosts) that when I was reading GS, I was sure Fitz will be in the next books. I still hope he come back.
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: Bones on September 09, 2011, 02:43:53 PM
I always found very rare the WoJ about not planning to use Fitz. He has been too well described and he was left so open (we still don't know why he heard ghosts) that when I was reading GS, I was sure Fitz will be in the next books. I still hope he come back.

I agree. Many of us singled him out as a great new character addition because of the way he was introduced and the relative unnecessary nature of his part of the GS storyline. The whole point of that storyline seemed to be to introduce Fitz as a relevant character for future books (I know there was a Harry epiphany involved, but it still feels like a tangent if that's all it was for). I was very disappointed when I saw that WoJ about Fitz being a one-shot. :(

I hope he comes back, too.
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: raidem on September 09, 2011, 02:57:36 PM
Quote
The cursed hint is 100% my hint to point people at MacFinn.  It's only based off of the other evidence, it's not canon.

Remember people, that the "Fitz is cursed" is not a WOJ.  It was a hint that Serack used at beginning of this thread to get people to guess MacFinn.  I have seen multiple times where people state there is a WOJ about this when in fact there isn't.
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: the neurovore of Zur-En-Aargh on September 09, 2011, 03:01:22 PM
I agree. Many of us singled him out as a great new character addition because of the way he was introduced and the relative unnecessary nature of his part of the GS storyline. The whole point of that storyline seemed to be to introduce Fitz as a relevant character for future books (I know there was a Harry epiphany involved, but it still feels like a tangent if that's all it was for). I was very disappointed when I saw that WoJ about Fitz being a one-shot. :(

I was pleased. Because the whole point of that story thread seemed to me to be about Harry's character development, not about any other scale of plot, and as I believe I have said before, I get a little tired of ways of reading the books where every single detail is taken as having to serve a plot function.
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: Sm0kEyNy on September 09, 2011, 03:38:26 PM
Just another observation of someone with red curly hair and golden eyes..."a very tall, slender, inhumanly beautiful woman stepped out of the smoke.  Reddish hair curled down past her hips in a riotous cascade, complementing her flawless skin, high cheekbones, and lush full bloodred lips.  Her face was ageless, and her golden eyes had vertical slits instead of pupils, like a cat..."Hello, my son," Lea purred.  I stepped forward, between the faerie and Michael and said, in a rough voice, "Hello Godmother."

Listens to Wind and Lea BOOM!!! 8)
and on another note not done reading but for the people point out how seraks guess doesnt fit the timeline i say "since when has jim let little things like descrepancies in timeline or tons of other things get in his way of telling a good story" he lets us nerds worry bout that stuff and argue if its intentional clues or jus actualy mistakes
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: the neurovore of Zur-En-Aargh on September 09, 2011, 03:45:05 PM
Listens to Wind and Lea BOOM!!! 8)
and on another note not done reading but for the people point out how seraks guess doesnt fit the timeline i say "since when has jim let little things like descrepancies in timeline or tons of other things get in his way of telling a good story" he lets us nerds worry bout that stuff and argue if its intentional clues or jus actualy mistakes

Some of us think that "good story" inherently entails having explanations for all the discrepancies, though.
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: badassassin on September 09, 2011, 04:51:35 PM
I still think that fitz can't be a wolf because we have a wolf character. it would be like a new cop joining with murphy-what's the point? we have a couple of wolves already. IMO, that means that 1. either fitz is a wolf but will not be significant, or 2. that he isn't a wolf and would be significant.
since fitz got a lot of screen time in GS, i say it has to be the second
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: Quantus on September 09, 2011, 05:04:25 PM
I still think that fitz can't be a wolf because we have a wolf character. it would be like a new cop joining with murphy-what's the point? we have a couple of wolves already. IMO, that means that 1. either fitz is a wolf but will not be significant, or 2. that he isn't a wolf and would be significant.
since fitz got a lot of screen time in GS, i say it has to be the second
His possible "wolf" half interests me far less than his possible Loup Garou half.  Unless the two combine or interact in some fashion.  Id love to see it where the Wolf half allowed him to gain a measure of control over during the loup Garou transformation that McFinn didnt have.  A controlled/intelligent Loup Garoup would be an immortal monster of incredible badassness  ;D
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: the neurovore of Zur-En-Aargh on September 09, 2011, 05:09:12 PM
I still think that fitz can't be a wolf because we have a wolf character. it would be like a new cop joining with murphy-what's the point?

What's the point to Stallings and Rawlings (and bears, oh my) ?

Quote
we have a couple of wolves already. IMO, that means that 1. either fitz is a wolf but will not be significant, or 2. that he isn't a wolf and would be significant.
since fitz got a lot of screen time in GS, i say it has to be the second

If Jim says he's not plot significant, I'm willing to believe he's not plot significant.  And I would cheer Jim for spending time on a character whose significance was in other ways than just plot.
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: Warden John Marcone on September 09, 2011, 07:41:56 PM
His possible "wolf" half interests me far less than his possible Loup Garou half.  Unless the two combine or interact in some fashion.  Id love to see it where the Wolf half allowed him to gain a measure of control over during the loup Garou transformation that McFinn didnt have.  A controlled/intelligent Loup Garoup would be an immortal monster of incredible badassness  ;D

That was my theory!
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: Dina on September 09, 2011, 08:00:26 PM
Remember people, that the "Fitz is cursed" is not a WOJ.  It was a hint that Serack used at beginning of this thread to get people to guess MacFinn.  I have seen multiple times where people state there is a WOJ about this when in fact there isn't.

Ooooooh! I thought it was WoJ and Serack had just transcribing a hint JB had said. Sorry, my mistake.
Now I have a lot of doubts about the theory. :'( :'(
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: Warden John Marcone on September 09, 2011, 08:12:50 PM
Ug.  Now I have to rework my theory.  Oh wait, no I don't, even without the WoJ the stuff still fits.  Who else has red hair in DF?
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: Dina on September 09, 2011, 08:15:51 PM
Hendricks!
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: Mira on September 09, 2011, 08:48:47 PM
I still think that fitz can't be a wolf because we have a wolf character. it would be like a new cop joining with murphy-what's the point? we have a couple of wolves already. IMO, that means that 1. either fitz is a wolf but will not be significant, or 2. that he isn't a wolf and would be significant.
since fitz got a lot of screen time in GS, i say it has to be the second

  I can see Fitz at some point becoming a Holy Knight, but sorry but I agree to me it just doesn't fit as a wolf.  I cannot see a child of Tara West, raised with her values in the woods of the Pacific Northwest, falling into the gutter to be pushed around as he was by a second rate sorcerer.  So as much as his description fits some things most of the stuff just doesn't fit.
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: Warden John Marcone on September 09, 2011, 10:57:47 PM
Hendricks!

...

Sorry, just had a squick moment.
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: LDF on September 09, 2011, 11:27:13 PM
  I can see Fitz at some point becoming a Holy Knight, but sorry but I agree to me it just doesn't fit as a wolf.  I cannot see a child of Tara West, raised with her values in the woods of the Pacific Northwest, falling into the gutter to be pushed around as he was by a second rate sorcerer.  So as much as his description fits some things most of the stuff just doesn't fit.
I think it fits perfectly as a wolf, honestly.
Fitz, born of Tera, as a wolf pup....weaned and then left to his own devices...he changes to human, and forgets/doesn't know he can change into a wolf, and gets found by humans.

I think the issue here that people are forgetting is that Tera is a wolf...she wouldn't necessarily raise a child with 'values'...that's a human thing, not a wolf thing. Remember, she was into MacFinn mostly because he turned into the biggest, baddest wolf around..not cause he was a nice guy who was kind to children and old people!

Fitz does exhibit some 'wolfy' characteristics, to me. Then again, they are very similar to a lot of Harry's traits, so they might be 'orphan' traits, rather than wolf ones.

Fitz, as a child of Tera and MacFinn, sounds plausible....but, I think we should probably also consider that he's a minor ectomantic talent, who's parents are dead.
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: Dina on September 10, 2011, 12:23:56 AM
...

Sorry, just had a squick moment.

Why? *is confused*
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: jeno on September 10, 2011, 12:57:36 PM
The problem is the timing. If Fitz was the son of either Tera of MacFinn, where was he during Fool Moon? Tera would have had to have been pregnant long before that point. Did she and (millionaire, I believe) MacFinn just dump the kid somewhere? With no resources or support structure, when MacFinn sure as hell could have afforded it? That doesn't make sense.
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: polkaneverdies on September 10, 2011, 01:11:16 PM
That is assuming that he has aged the way a human would for his entire life. If the hypothesis is correct then that might not be the case. If one of his parents was a wolf and one was a human then why assume he ages at the same rate as a normal human?
 
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: Mira on September 10, 2011, 02:14:03 PM
Quote
That is assuming that he has aged the way a human would for his entire life. If the hypothesis is correct then that might not be the case. If one of his parents was a wolf and one was a human then why assume he ages at the same rate as a normal human?
 
  That is a good point, but a stretch in my opinion, yes the age is all wrong. What tells me more than anything he isn't Tera West's pup, is his behavior.  Wolves are social creatures, they run in packs and are very good parents.  Tera West was impressive in her values,  a big thing she did was to teach the Alphas a good value system and what it means to be a wolf.  Fitz didn't show any of that, yeah, he is a sensitive, and Harry saw that he wasn't all bad, but if Harry hadn't come along, Fitz would have continued down the same road he was on most likely.  To me that just doesn't fit with the values of Tera West.
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: OZ on September 10, 2011, 03:26:55 PM
I don't buy the theory that he is a wolf but just for the fun of it to make the pieces fit....What if Fitz was born as a wolf pup and raised by Tera? From what I could find by Googling it, wolves are fully grown at two years old. If Fitz was around a year or a year and a half old, was somehow separated from his mother and took human form and somehow lost his memory of his early years or was convinced by helpful humans that he was crazy, he might end up as an older orphan with little or no memory of his wolf origins or his wolf past. Maybe he transformed on his own, was found wandering with no understanding of human speech and was turned over to the appropriate juvenile authorities.
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: Arkham8 on September 10, 2011, 03:45:31 PM
So...Jim didn't actually say Fitz is cursed, Serack did...?

It's because he has red hair isn't it? Ron Weasley had red hair! Ginger power!

(Even though I have brown hair  :P)
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: Mira on September 10, 2011, 04:27:34 PM
So...Jim didn't actually say Fitz is cursed, Serack did...?

It's because he has red hair isn't it? Ron Weasley had red hair! Ginger power!

(Even though I have brown hair  :P)

 He could also be related to Gard, lots of Scandinavians have red hair, remember the famous Viking, Eric the Red?
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: LDF on September 10, 2011, 10:43:57 PM
  That is a good point, but a stretch in my opinion, yes the age is all wrong. What tells me more than anything he isn't Tera West's pup, is his behavior.  Wolves are social creatures, they run in packs and are very good parents.  Tera West was impressive in her values,  a big thing she did was to teach the Alphas a good value system and what it means to be a wolf.  Fitz didn't show any of that, yeah, he is a sensitive, and Harry saw that he wasn't all bad, but if Harry hadn't come along, Fitz would have continued down the same road he was on most likely.  To me that just doesn't fit with the values of Tera West.
And if he ran away....he wouldn't have been raised by Tera.

The 'values' you are talking about are really nebulous things...it just doesn't disprove the theory.
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: Warden John Marcone on September 10, 2011, 11:12:46 PM
He could also be related to Gard, lots of Scandinavians have red hair, remember the famous Viking, Eric the Red?

But red hair is associated with the Irish, not the Scandanavians.  Yes, there are red haired Vikings, but from what I've seen Blonde and Black hair is WAAAAY more common than Red hair. 

Edit: And you keep bringing up Eric the Red.  Are you a descendant or something?  Not mocking, I'm just curious.
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: LDF on September 10, 2011, 11:16:55 PM
But red hair is associated with the Irish, not the Scandanavians.  Yes, there are red haired Vikings, but from what I've seen Blonde and Black hair is WAAAAY more common than Red hair.
In addition...how would he be related to Gard?
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: Mira on September 11, 2011, 12:12:01 AM
But red hair is associated with the Irish, not the Scandanavians.  Yes, there are red haired Vikings, but from what I've seen Blonde and Black hair is WAAAAY more common than Red hair. 

Edit: And you keep bringing up Eric the Red.  Are you a descendant or something?  Not mocking, I'm just curious.
No, I happen to be a Danish decent, lots of red heads in my family.  There was a bit of a Scandinavian colony where I grew up, a lot of them were red heads.  In fact I know more red heads of Scandinavian decent than I do Irish, most of the ones I know have black hair.
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: jeno on September 11, 2011, 12:19:43 PM
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_hair

"Red or reddish-tinged hair is also found in other European populations particularly in the Nordic and Baltic countries as well as parts of the Netherlands, Spain, Belgium, France, Greece, Turkey, Portugal, Italy, Germany, Russia and South Slavic countries."
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: Mira on September 11, 2011, 03:53:55 PM
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_hair

"Red or reddish-tinged hair is also found in other European populations particularly in the Nordic and Baltic countries as well as parts of the Netherlands, Spain, Belgium, France, Greece, Turkey, Portugal, Italy, Germany, Russia and South Slavic countries."

 Yeah, it is all about the right combo of genes, it isn't good to generalize too much about any group.
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: Sm0kEyNy on September 11, 2011, 04:49:20 PM
i always took Eric the red being odd for haveing red hair thus being dubbed eric the red but what do iknow
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: Mira on September 11, 2011, 05:20:46 PM
i always took Eric the red being odd for haveing red hair thus being dubbed eric the red but what do iknow

  That is how I understood he got the name, but I could be wrong, wouldn't be the first time nor the last.
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: Arkham8 on September 11, 2011, 06:45:14 PM
I always figured he was angry and/or blood-soaked.
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: Sm0kEyNy on September 11, 2011, 08:06:30 PM
I always figured he was angry and/or blood-soaked.

he was pissed off cuz he was a ginger
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: Sir Huron Stone on September 11, 2011, 08:08:35 PM
he was pissed off cuz he was a ginger
HA!
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: Mira on September 11, 2011, 08:46:55 PM
HA!

 Makes sense because red heads are supposed to have bad tempers... ;)
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: mdodd on September 12, 2011, 06:03:28 PM
 Anybody taken a good look at those two Irish hockey players the O'Sedin twins????
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: polkaneverdies on September 13, 2011, 02:31:07 PM
Fitz protects the members of his "pack". He takes the punishment his "Alpha" dishes out. He follows the lead of his alpha. What doesn't work as wolfish?

Additionally I don't recall who made the comment but what "good values" did Tera West teach the Alphas?
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: Darkshore on September 13, 2011, 02:55:12 PM
Didn't Jim state that Fitz was meant to be a one time character? Of course so was Butters so things can change, but all this speculation seems to revolve around him being an important character when I'm almost certain Jim states he was not.
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: LDF on September 13, 2011, 08:11:31 PM
Fitz protects the members of his "pack". He takes the punishment his "Alpha" dishes out. He follows the lead of his alpha. What doesn't work as wolfish?
It does work as wolfish..it's very wolfish.
It's also what Harry does...to a degree.

As I said above, I think those traits could also be 'orphan' traits.
ie Fitz protects his 'family', he accepts the punishment his 'father' dishes out, he follows his 'father's' lead....


Additionally I don't recall who made the comment but what "good values" did Tera West teach the Alphas?
She taught them how to be wolves, according to Fool Moon.
I'm not sure what other 'values' are being discussed.
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: LDF on September 13, 2011, 08:12:24 PM
Didn't Jim state that Fitz was meant to be a one time character? Of course so was Butters so things can change, but all this speculation seems to revolve around him being an important character when I'm almost certain Jim states he was not.
Yes, there's a WoJ to state that...btu this thread predates the WoJ (I think) :)
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: Mira on September 13, 2011, 08:59:54 PM
Quote
She taught them how to be wolves, according to Fool Moon.
I'm not sure what other 'values' are being discussed.

For one thing she taught the Alphas that wolves do not act like the guys with the belts, nor do they act like the Loup.  As I remember she was of great moral character in her own right, a great example for the young Alphas.
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: Simms on September 14, 2011, 02:15:58 AM
Great moral character for wolves not humans. Sure she taught them that but that wouldn't have much bearing on Fitz unless he was raised with her which I'm pretty sure he wasn't.

But I do like the idea that he could be some halfbreed shapshifting wolf from Terra West
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: Vairelome on September 14, 2011, 02:28:49 AM
Yes, there's a WoJ to state that...btu this thread predates the WoJ (I think) :)

It does; the WoJ referenced is quoted on page 10 of this very thread by dagaetch.  Fitz was a major character in GS; whether he will be a character of much significance in the overall series remains to be seen.

It may be splitting hairs, but I think this theory could still be consistent with Fitz not reappearing in the series.  All it would mean is that the Loup-Garou curse would not be relevant to the later adventures of Harry Dresden.
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: Arkham8 on September 14, 2011, 03:39:52 AM
But Jim didn't say Fitz was cursed, did he? Pretty sure that came from Serack.
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: LDF on September 14, 2011, 03:46:36 AM
For one thing she taught the Alphas that wolves do not act like the guys with the belts, nor do they act like the Loup.  As I remember she was of great moral character in her own right, a great example for the young Alphas.
Could you please define 'great moral character'? It just seems like one of those 'fuzzy' opinion things.

Also, remember, she was engaged to the Loup, and I think there's a scene where she tells Harry at least part of the reason is because he's the most destructive thing out there.
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: Mira on September 14, 2011, 03:50:09 AM
Could you please define 'great moral character'? It just seems like one of those 'fuzzy' opinion things.

Also, remember, she was engaged to the Loup, and I think there's a scene where she tells Harry at least part of the reason is because he's the most destructive thing out there.

  By her lights, tis a judgment call for sure, she was honest as only a wolf or a dog can be honest, the Alphas would have turned into a mess if it weren't for her..
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: LDF on September 14, 2011, 04:25:18 AM
  By her lights, tis a judgment call for sure, she was honest as only a wolf or a dog can be honest, the Alphas would have turned into a mess if it weren't for her..
Is that your definition of moral character? Honesty?

The Alpha's weren't a 'mess'...they were just children, both litterally and figuratively...she taught them how wolves act, how to actually USE the senses of their new forms.
I dont' think she was running ethics classes, though.
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: Mira on September 14, 2011, 04:37:23 AM
Is that your definition of moral character? Honesty?

The Alpha's weren't a 'mess'...they were just children, both litterally and figuratively...she taught them how wolves act, how to actually USE the senses of their new forms.
I dont' think she was running ethics classes, though.
  Honesty is basic to morality my friend.  Yes, she did, and she also taught them how wolves act, no more, no less, true to themselves and true to the animal form they were taking, that is ethics. 
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: LDF on September 14, 2011, 05:21:40 AM
  Honesty is basic to morality my friend.  Yes, she did, and she also taught them how wolves act, no more, no less, true to themselves and true to the animal form they were taking, that is ethics.
See, this is the problem with your argument, Mira.
Above, you claimed Tera West had 'great moral character' which would have been communicated to Fitz, had she raised him.

Using the values you've defined above (Honesty), and given that I don't think we see any instance of Fitz lying, that means he also shows 'great moral character', using your definition.

Part of the problem with using the 'moral' argument is that 'morals' are different for different people.
I dont' think 'being true to yourself' has anythign to do with ethics or morality, personally.
On top of that, we don't really see Tera exhibit any morals...she's never put in a position where she has to make a moral choice.
All we really see is her supporting and trying to help her fiance, McFinn.
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: Vairelome on September 14, 2011, 07:42:55 AM
But Jim didn't say Fitz was cursed, did he? Pretty sure that came from Serack.

Yeah, that was part of Serack's theory, in pages 1-3 of this thread.  At some later point, and I think it was in a different thread, someone alleged that JB had confirmed "Fitz is cursed" at a signing.  It's not listed in the master WoJ list, as far as I know, and could easily have been the result of Thread Telephone.
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: JessE on September 14, 2011, 01:36:11 PM
Holy cow, I have Got to do a thorough re-read because I totally missed that.....what else did I miss!? Lol
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: Arkham8 on September 14, 2011, 03:12:10 PM
Holy cow, I have Got to do a thorough re-read because I totally missed that.....what else did I miss!? Lol
Hey, it's Emma Stone!
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: the neurovore of Zur-En-Aargh on September 14, 2011, 03:25:57 PM
  Honesty is basic to morality my friend.

That depends on the morality.  It certainly seems to be basic for Faerie.
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: JessE on September 14, 2011, 04:14:24 PM
Hey, it's Emma Stone!
Just switched to Pink! XD
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: LDF on September 14, 2011, 08:04:46 PM
That depends on the morality.  It certainly seems to be basic for Faerie.
Is it morality if you simply cannot lie?
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: the neurovore of Zur-En-Aargh on September 14, 2011, 08:24:46 PM
Is it morality if you simply cannot lie?

I am willing to think of the way in which Faerie thought and engagement with the universe is shaped by inability to lie as a morality, myself. 
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: LDF on September 14, 2011, 09:40:08 PM
I am willing to think of the way in which Faerie thought and engagement with the universe is shaped by inability to lie as a morality, myself.
I've always seen it as a biological imperative...something forced upon them by the universe, as a counterbalance to their greater lifespan and power, and as such, not a moral choice.

Your view is interesting though.
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: Dina on September 14, 2011, 09:44:00 PM
I have the same view than LDF
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: badassassin on September 14, 2011, 10:16:30 PM
OFF TOPIC
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: Electric MacButters on September 14, 2011, 10:59:51 PM
As the guy who helped Serak develop his theory on the drive back from the DC signing, I can unequivicably confirm that, at the creation of the thread, there was no WoJ as to wether Fitz was cursed or not.  That statement was placed in the OP as a clue for the rest of the forumites as to who we thought his parents were.

Insofar as Fitz' red hair and pug nose, we reread Fool Moon looking for physical descriptions of McFinn and discovered that his human discription had been painted with very broad strokes, invoking everyone's personal image of a rugged mountain man without actually going into much detail.  The red hair and pug nose are treated as clues because both have become steriotypes of Irish decent, not because they match McFinn's description.

Another avenue that may or may not have been fully explored in the past 15 pages; who exactly did Saint Patrick curse?  Irish legend mentions a mage/king by the name of Finn McCool (or Finn son of Cool.)  Finn McCool was known for having preternatural wisdom when he accidentially tased the Salmon of Knowledge as an apprentice wizard and was said to have dealings with the Tuatha de Dannan.  When expanding through Europe, the Catholic church was known to attempt to discredit pagan leaders to bolster the faith of their local converts.  I find it plausible in the DV that either Finn or one of his decendants would be targeted by the church as a living reminder of benevolent (or at least powerful) forces outside of the christian pantheon.  In a move to secure the catholic faith in Ireland, St. Patrick cursed the Island's previous supernatural defender to become a ravening beast, forcing the people to turn to the church for protection.

Please keep in mind that I am in no way trying to condemn or condone  any historical actions of the catholic church.  The church of 1200 is different in many ways from the church of 2011, and I am talking about a fictional universe.
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: the neurovore of Zur-En-Aargh on September 14, 2011, 11:27:26 PM
I've always seen it as a biological imperative...something forced upon them by the universe, as a counterbalance to their greater lifespan and power, and as such, not a moral choice.

Does morality have to entail choice ?
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: the neurovore of Zur-En-Aargh on September 14, 2011, 11:28:37 PM
OFF TOPIC

So long as it;s about the DF, it's on-topic in this forum.
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: LDF on September 14, 2011, 11:48:41 PM
Does morality have to entail choice ?
In my opinion...yes.
Because, to me, morality is about a set of rules and values you choose to adhere, not are forced to adhere to.

Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: Serack on September 15, 2011, 01:10:33 AM
Yeah, that was part of Serack's theory, in pages 1-3 of this thread.  At some later point, and I think it was in a different thread, someone alleged that JB had confirmed "Fitz is cursed" at a signing.  It's not listed in the master WoJ list, as far as I know, and could easily have been the result of Thread Telephone.

yah, the OP and I think the last post on the first page wrap up how it's not definite, but it certainly adds up.
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: jeno on September 15, 2011, 10:28:45 PM
Wait.

So what's pure speculation and what's WOJ?

If something is WOJ, when and where did it happen? Who can confirm?
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: Mira on September 16, 2011, 06:39:03 AM
Wait.

So what's pure speculation and what's WOJ?

If something is WOJ, when and where did it happen? Who can confirm?

Word of Jim, something he said at a book signing or some other gig..  Most place that above what he wrote in his novels, some of us do not..  Not always but sometimes WOJ seems to contradict what he was getting at at the time he wrote the book.  There are those where who  keep all WOJ on record. and you can find most things that you are looking for.  Then there is the stuff that claims to be WOJ but turns out are made up out of whole cloth, urban myth, yet taken as gospel over what was written in the books.. That has lead to some really hard feelings between the what is written in the books verses WOJ crowd, until someone comes clean and says that Jim never said this or that.. Apparently Fitz is one of those hotly debated subjects.
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: jeno on September 16, 2011, 02:21:09 PM
Yeah, I get all that. The problem seems to be that part of this theory comes from Serack, the WOJ guy. But that doesn't mean it was a WOJ. It could just be fan speculation that's getting more traction because of the source. I'm waiting for someone to clarify the issue before it carries on any further. Was it a WOJ, when/where, who can confirm?
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: Dina on September 16, 2011, 05:56:43 PM
From the first post from Serack: "So I'm now home from the Washington DC signing, and I got to ask Jim if there was significance to his choice of Fitz's name.  First he confirmed that he was aware Fitz means bastard, and he softly confirmed that this was intentional, and we would see how eventually"

I know there is another WoJ about Fitz as a single book character, but I don't have the exact words.
Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: jeno on September 16, 2011, 09:14:24 PM
But then there's this:

As the guy who helped Serak develop his theory on the drive back from the DC signing, I can unequivicably confirm that, at the creation of the thread, there was no WoJ as to wether Fitz was cursed or not.  That statement was placed in the OP as a clue for the rest of the forumites as to who we thought his parents were.

So which is it?

Title: Re: [GS Spoilers] The truth about Fitz (seriously, it's spoilerific) (fresh from DC)
Post by: Dina on September 16, 2011, 09:45:44 PM
Nothing contradicting what I said. Fitz being cursed is not WoJ. Only Serack and EMB theory.