Um, why? Is something wrong about his name? 

There is/was a Sports Commentator at the BBC named Harry Carpenter.  Aside from that, and the general teasing a name like Harry might get in the U.S., I don't really know either. 

"Even Hand" Marcone, Gard and Hendricks all got knocked around, Justine had been kidnapped.
Justine got slashed in the abdomen by the Skinwalker in TC.

Some of those I would question, liek Grey Cloak and Passenger. He only called them that because he didn't know who they were. Names stick when you know who someone or something is, know their true name, but decided to rename them or give them a new name.

Ask b4utoo. He choose to remove the titles on his threads. They are still active, though. So, if you want to post to them I don't see any reason not to.

Looking for the WOJ on the list of who can take down Mab. The one that includes the point about the Whole White Court and if they did they woudl get her power.

I didn't mean my post here to read hostile or dismissive of your effort and I apologise if it came across that way.

Reading those two quotes again, though, the one from chapter 29 of DB seems to admit of more than one possible interpretation, and to my mind, "I've seen the fruits of that kind of path"  followed by a bunch of examples of murder, suffering and misery skews towards Harry objecting to paths involving murder, suffering and misery rather than using necromancy specifically - I'd cite the main plot of FM as an example of a road paved in the corpses of innocents to what the people involved believed was a greater good, which Harry has previously encountered, that had nothing to do with necromancy.  On the other hand, I am at a loss for a way of reading "It had been used to preserve life, just as the magic I knew could be used either to protect or to destroy." compatible with regarding necromancy as an inherently corruptive force.

All magic has the potential to corrupt, though some  (like Necromancy) more so than others. How it is used, and by whom is just as important as the type of magic. However, certain magic (again like Necromancy), feeds into a need to kill people. Which is why it is far more corrupting than most other magic.

He isn't tainted to the extent that it messes up his mind and judgement, in the way that, say, the Korean kid at the start of PG blatantly is.

We have evidence that using the force of magic that Harry normally uses, which is repeatedly described as a positive and life-driven/aspected/oriented force, for killing or warping people's minds is corrupting and perverting and messes up the caster.

We also have evidence that necromancy is a fundamentally different force.  Harry notes this in GP when looking at the black barbed-wire spell.  It isn't life-aspected, if anything it's death-aspected.

Therefore we have no reason to lump both forces together under the heading of "black magic" and expect them both to work the same way in every detail.

Sooo...then there is Grey Magic?

The line in your first quote "if that dark power could be employed in whatever fashion its wielder chose, that made it no different from my own" strikes me as fairly definitive on that point.

Not at all. It seems fairly obvious to me that what Jim is going for there is that plans that involve killing innocents are evil, and then that following your own judgement regardless of the consequences is evil. (This latter from Harry I do take as irony.) Nothing in there specifiies that it's the mechanism you use to do those evil things that makes them bad; Harry would be just as disapproving of a mundane dictator with utopian fantasies that involved killing lots of innocent people, I reckon.

Non-evil, extenuating circumstances can exist to justify 'breaking' each of the laws. In theory. But just because you are convinced that you have to kill Hitler with magic to save millions of lives, doesn't mean you won't be tainted by it, doesn't mean that it's not "Black Magic".

Kumori was idealistic in her desire to use Necromancy to 'end death'. Harry pointed out to her, rightly so, that there are so many ways what she desired could turn wrong. That she was still harming innocents and sacrificing lives for a goal that, as well intentioned as she thought she was, as much as she tried to justify her actions, would still be twisted to evil.