« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 [3]   Go Down

Author Topic: Dangling Participants  (Read 7305 times)

Offline Dina

  • Has Collapsed Into a Singularity of Posts (a.k.a, "The Dina")
  • ***
  • Posts: 105329
    • View Profile
Re: Dangling Participants
« Reply #30 on: October 19, 2020, 10:51:37 PM »
If the Gatekeeper voted against Harry, JB has a very good reason in his mind.

I don't think Martha was injured in the battle (they were taking special care with her because she had a plaster and walking problems). Would 3 votes will be enough?

Quote from: Bad Alias on October 19, 2020, 01:46:16 AM
Maybe being on fire for a little while isn't that big of a deal for someone on the Senior Council.

Yes, he may have protections on his body that are not obvious to anyone watching him burn. So perhaps the fires damage his suit for instance, but not actually burn him, or at least not to a major degree. Fire resistance +5, perhaps. So he could have been moderately injured, even in pain, but able to cast a vote.
Logged
Missing you, Md 

There are many horrible sights in the multiverse. Somehow, though, to a soul attuned to the subtle rhythms of a library, there are few worse sights than a hole where a book ought to be. Someone has stolen a book (Terry Pratchett)

Offline Bad Alias

  • Posty McPostington
  • ***
  • Posts: 2208
    • View Profile
Re: Dangling Participants
« Reply #31 on: October 19, 2020, 11:03:05 PM »
Quote from: Dina on October 19, 2020, 10:51:37 PM
Would 3 votes will be enough?
Yes. It takes three votes for the Council to take up an issue. We see this in Summer Knight. It's kind of like the American Supreme Court. If four justices (of 9) vote to hear a case, the Court hears the case.
Logged

Offline Dina

  • Has Collapsed Into a Singularity of Posts (a.k.a, "The Dina")
  • ***
  • Posts: 105329
    • View Profile
Re: Dangling Participants
« Reply #32 on: October 19, 2020, 11:08:37 PM »
Ok, I guess is 30% but it seems a little too much that if the case were something affecting more than just Harry only 3 people would have decided the destiny of so many. But it does not matter, it is what it is.
Logged
Missing you, Md 

There are many horrible sights in the multiverse. Somehow, though, to a soul attuned to the subtle rhythms of a library, there are few worse sights than a hole where a book ought to be. Someone has stolen a book (Terry Pratchett)

Offline Basil

  • Conversationalist
  • **
  • Posts: 154
    • View Profile
Re: Dangling Participants
« Reply #33 on: October 19, 2020, 11:21:31 PM »
If they had Merlin, Mai and Liberty then they had a quorum. 

Then, in any vote Merlin would hold the proxy of everyone not present -- McCoy, LTW, Christos, Rashid.

Thus the "unanimous vote." 
Logged

Offline Mira

  • Needs A Life
  • ***
  • Posts: 24054
    • View Profile
Re: Dangling Participants
« Reply #34 on: October 20, 2020, 03:05:48 AM »
Quote from: Basil on October 19, 2020, 11:21:31 PM
If they had Merlin, Mai and Liberty then they had a quorum. 

Then, in any vote Merlin would hold the proxy of everyone not present -- McCoy, LTW, Christos, Rashid.

Thus the "unanimous vote."

Yeah, considering that apparently the Merlin doesn't ask his proxies how they wish him to vote on
their behalf.
Logged

Offline Bad Alias

  • Posty McPostington
  • ***
  • Posts: 2208
    • View Profile
Re: Dangling Participants
« Reply #35 on: October 20, 2020, 06:33:46 PM »
Yeah. The Merlin gets everyone's proxy who hasn't designated it. Others can designate a proxy ahead of time. I think that's what was said in PG.
Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3]   Go Up
« previous next »