ParanetOnline

The Dresden Files => DF Spoilers => DF Reference Collection => Topic started by: Elegast on November 29, 2012, 09:08:30 PM

Title: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: Elegast on November 29, 2012, 09:08:30 PM
The Cowl = Simon theory has been discussed in a huge number of threads. This is an attempt to write a reference thread summing all the knowledge about it. Criticism of the theory and of the OP is encouraged.

The theory is old and well-known, so I haven't been able to identify its original author. Still I would like to thank Raptor, 123456789blaaa and Neurovore, as I stole much from their posts to write this one. Many, many others wrote insightful posts on the subject, thank you all.


Cowl is Simon Petrovich

Everything we know about Cowl


(click to show/hide)

So we know that Cowl:

Cowl is Simon, Klaus or a new character


The core argument of the Cowl=Simon theory is very simple and very powerful:

we know that Cowl is a human SC-level wizard, so the list of suspect is very short:


During Dead Beat the SC was fighting the Reds. So we have two possibilities: Simon or Klaus.

It's impossible to rule out Klaus, but we have arguments against it:

Quote from: Summer Knight
Injun Joe interrupted. "Wizard Schneider is a fine enchanter, and he has a reputation for skill and honesty. But he is young for such a responsibility. There are wizards present who are his senior in experience and the Art. They deserve the consideration of the Council."
Quote from: Summer Knight
"Wizard Schneider."
A small, round-cheeked man with a fringe of gauzy white down over his scalp and a round belly stretching his robes stood up and gave Ebenezar a brief nod. Then he looked up at the Merlin and said, in Latin with a heavy Germanic accent, "While I am grateful for the offer, honored Merlin, I must respectfully decline your nomination, in favor of Wizard McCoy. He will serve the Council more ably than I."

Klaus is small, whereas Cowl has long arms and is taller than Kumori, who is tall enough to held Harry's hair (she has to stretch to do so).

Klaus shows no sign of injury.

LTW implies that McCoy is a greater wizard than Klaus, and Klaus seems to agree.

This quote:
Quote from: Dead Beat
"Bite my ass, Cowl." 
Kumori's hood twitched back and forth between Cowl and me.  She took three steps back.
"Just as well," Cowl murmured.  "I have wanted to see for myself what has the wardens so nervous about you."
seems to imply that Cowl has never met Harry before (and yet he already has in GP...). Klaus has already met Harry.

And on the other hand, the case for Simon is really strong.

The case for Simon Petrovitch = Cowl

Simon was a male, human wizard, member of the senior Council.

He was living in Archangel, Russia, so he knew Goethe (his works at least) and could have used 'Dorosh', which seems to have East-european origines.

He's the leader of the 'Brute Squad', which went against Kemmler, so he knew Kemmler.

His apprentice Justin took Bob from the ruin of Kemmler's lab. So it's a fair bet he knew about Bob.

Justin had extensive contacts with the Oustsiders, implying that Simon would have no problem getting connected to them.

Simon had a female apprentice:
Quote from: Paranet Files Preview
You’ll see direct translations from sources like Simon and his apprentice Larisa Yevtushenko

He was not evil/mad as Kemmler was.

So we see that Simon would have no problem filling all the characteristics of Cowl, and is the only character to do so in the Dresdenverse.

In reverse, it would be far easier for Cowl to carry his plots if he were Simon:

Quote from: Summer Knight
Martha shook her head. "Simon Pietrovich. Senior Council member. Our vampire expert. He was killed less than two days ago. The whole compound in Archangel , Ebenezar. All of them. I'm sorry."
Ebenezar shook his head slowly. His voice was a pale shadow of its usual self. "I've been to his tower. It was a fortress. How did they do it? "The Wardens said that they couldn't be sure, but it looked like someone let the killers in past the defenses. They didn't get away unscathed. There were the remains of half a dozen nobles of the Red Court . Many of their warriors. But they killed Simon and the rest."
"Let them in?" Ebenezar breathed. "Treachery? But even if it was true, it would have to be someone who knew his defenses inside and out."

Firstly, we know there was traitor at Archangel. Since it's improbable that any of the victim was the traitor, Lafortier logically assumes that Harry is responsable. We know that to be false. So someone in the complex was the traitor. Someone who was not killed. Simon being Cowl solves that mystery.

Secondly, Simon was the WC vampire expert. Cowl planned two big vampires operations during the books: the war with the Red Court and the coup in the White Court. Cowl was very close to Bianca and Vittorio, and maybe Madrigal, Madeline and Mavra, Bianca's teacher. Cowl needed extensive knowledge of the vampires courts, and many contacts/allies among them to accomplish his plots, so being Simon would definitely make his life easier.

Little WAG: We know Cowl has sustained serious injuries and survived deathcurses. I believe that several members of the Brute Squad understood he was a traitor, and used their deathcurses against him. He survived, but with heavy injuries.


The deathcurse WOJ problem

There is one major objection to this theory, caused by one WOJ:

Quote from: WOJ
See what happened to all the vampires around Simon when they assaulted his compound immediately prior to the onstage events in Summer Knight.

It seems to imply that Simon throw his deathcurse.


However, three counter-arguments are possible:

- the WOJ does not explicitly says that Simon casted his deathcurse. Maybe the vampires were around Simon because he was the one leading them.

-  maybe he did cast his deathcurse, but still managed to resurrect the CorpseTaker way. After all, non soulfire powered deathcurse should not use up the soul.

- maybe he faked his own deathcurse, which is not completely impossible per WOJ:
Quote from: WOJ
Definitely a qualitative difference. I mean, we rate nukes in terms of "how many thousand tons of TNT is this equal to?" but let me see you try to deploy 80,000 tons of TNT as a weapon. If you could, the destruction would be the same, in theory, but the nuke has a quality all its own that makes it stand out. A death curse is the same thing. A really powerful practitioner (any member of the Council) could probably simulate a death curse with enough time and forethought, but there would be traces that an investigator could find, afterward. "Hey, why are there tire tracks worn into this road? Because someone was using it to haul 80,000 tons of TNT to the site of the explosion, and you can't do that without a LOT of trucks."

Paranet Papers

In the new RPG, there will be a lot of info about Simon. Which may be imply that Simon is not that important after all.

Quote from: Knnn
[looks at notes]
Hmmm, it looks like that quote is not as clear cut as I remember it.

It's from a podcast from 2d6 feet in a random direction (http://2d6feet.com/), #56 (from April 2010, I believe).  I have a transcript for the relevant parts (5-7 minute mark), the rest of the hour is not really about the DF.   Serack -- I don't know if you have this down already, so you may want to add it.

Regular font is Fred, bold face is the interviewers.  Fred is talking about how much input Jim had for the new material.

Quote
So, we got a few tidbits from him, we will be getting to invent details; far more detail than we invented for the core books.  Um in a number of cases, but we'll also be drawing from "Hey Jim give us a few bullet points about a particular location".  You know, if we want the people to work for the, the player characters stand in the Nevernever chapter to work for the Gatekeeepr in some capacity, what do we need to know about that, and what came out of that was Jim telling me about where the Gatekeepers demesne is.  Where his domain is, where his private citadel is ensconced somewhere in the Nevernever, and the route to it, and I will reveal that here involves walking across the surface of the moon.

Nice, I mean clearly some sort of magical protection...

So you've got that sort of thing in there, but we've also got things like where Simon Pietrovich, Justin Dumorne's mentor, and the Senior Council member that was a... um... removed from power, shall we say in book four, he clearly lived somewhere in Russia, likely during the Russian Revolution, so we, how much control do we have over him.  {quoting Jim} "Fair amount, I don't really have a lot in mind for him, so obviously I'll want to look at it, what your ideas are, but you can do, you can mess around with that".  So we're like "OK, we're going to make him a friend of the Czar, as the Russian revolution is breaking out and have that, you know, tie his hands a little bit and push some things into a direction the is going to be a problem".

That's pretty cool.  What a terrible terrible set of constraints you have for a licensed product. 

So on the on hand you've got Jim's "I don't really have a lot in mind", but on the other, you've got Fred seemingly avoiding declaring that Simon is dead.

Motivation

For a very long time, no obvious motivation was available to explain Simon's potential fall. After Cold Days, and taking in account that Cowl was the one supplying the infected athame, it seems probable that Cowl is infected. It's interesting to note that Aurora, who was infected, thought she was working for the greater good.  The same may have happened to Simon, as Cowl seems genuinely concerned by the morality/sanity of his actions.

Sources

Memories of old threads and:
- Serack's WOJ compilation
- this long thread on the subject (http://www.jimbutcheronline.com/bb/index.php/topic,34204.msg1609574.html#msg1609574)
- this even longer one (http://www.jimbutcheronline.com/bb/index.php/topic,467.0.html)
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: Clenzor on November 29, 2012, 09:15:48 PM
Other speculation about the Deathcurse, Archangel was a wizard stronghold with lots of wizards other than Simon there.  All of the Death Curses of those wizards could have destroyed a large bulk of the vampires and the WC could mistakenly be reading it as mostly Simon's Deathcurse. 
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: haaschnp on November 29, 2012, 09:50:17 PM
OR
What if Cowl/Simon is not infected, but bargained with the outsiders to be infected-free to allow him to work on this side of things to bring the outsiders in? Simon recognizes there is a whole lot that is wrong and messed up. Just look at his quote about the White Council. He wants that changed. Same with the darkhallow. He wants to bring everything down to dust and rebuild it. Outsiders, in his mind, would be perfect for doing that. Of course, he's gravely mistaken. And maybe through prolonged dealings with them, he does get/ or already is infected. But I think, if this theory is correct, he began his talks with the Outsiders uninfected and seeing himself as their peer. In the end, he'll soon realize he's been duped.

It'd be crazy to see Cowl and Harry fighting side by side. Heck, maybe he'll go over to one side of the Gates to seal themever from the Outside. Series Ends. Cowl somewhat redeems himself by sealing himself and the Outsiders forever Outside. And Harry survives to write the Dresden Files.
Discuss.
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: EdgeOfDreams on November 29, 2012, 10:02:10 PM
Cowl = Simon is probably the single most sane, rational, and well-supported theory I've seen on these boards. Thanks for laying out the evidence.
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: Clenzor on November 29, 2012, 10:03:50 PM
Cowl = Simon is probably the single most sane, rational, and well-supported theory I've seen on these boards. Thanks for laying out the evidence.

Duck's Molly=Mab theory definitely picked up a lot of traction though.
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: EdgeOfDreams on November 29, 2012, 10:15:47 PM
Duck's Molly=Mab theory definitely picked up a lot of traction though.

There's no denying that theory was fascinating, but to me it always seemed just over the edge of what I really believed Butcher would write. Simon=Cowl, on the other hand, fits right into the patterns we have come to expect from our beloved Jimmy.
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: Elegast on November 29, 2012, 10:25:35 PM
Duck's Molly=Mab theory definitely picked up a lot of traction though.

Molly=Mab was fascinating, and came out very close to the truth, but unfortunately it's wrong as Titania is Mab's sister, and Titania is not Molly's sister.
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: madness on November 29, 2012, 11:16:31 PM
Nice summary.

Simon does not HAVE to be Cowl but it would sure make a whole lot of sense.

I don't have any text evidence to support me on this but I still have a gut feeling or an intuition that Cowl might not be corrupted by or directly involved with the Outsiders.

We see him involved with groups or individuals who are proven to be involved with the Outsiders but we never actually see Cowl summoning one.

Perhaps he is infiltrating Nemesis infected or influenced supernatural groups (Red Court, White Court, Kemmlerites, etc.) and posing as an ally to them so that he is well placed to either turn them aside at the last moment or to tip someone off somewhere as to what is going on.

It wouldn't take much for him to do something subtle that brings these Outsider related plots to the attention of Mab or Odin or Harry (who can then run things up the ladder to the White Council or others that he knows).

----

That little half of a sentence from the Paranet files is a HUGE bit of information, BTW.  To have an actual name that might be Kumori's is a really exciting thing.  When exactly was that RPG info made available - is it new?
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: Clenzor on November 29, 2012, 11:19:24 PM
He sends the Outsider influenced Ghouls into the Wraith Deeps in White Night. 
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: Second Aristh on November 29, 2012, 11:28:26 PM
One more interesting quote on Cowl if you wanted to add it.  We get that Cowl has heard of Dresden's ability, but never seen it firsthand.

DB Ch.8
Quote
"Bite my ass, Cowl." 
Kumori's hood twitched back and forth between Cowl and me.  She took three steps back.
"Just as well," Cowl murmured.  "I have wanted to see for myself what has the wardens so nervous about you."
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: temporus on November 30, 2012, 03:16:19 AM
That quote is something that ruled out (for me) all the other original SC members.    We've seen Harry talking and meeting and in some instances getting his measure taken by all the other SC members prior to Dead Beat.  The only one we never saw him have contact with was Simon.   It's a quote that ostensibly doesn't make sense for someone already familiar with him in person to say.
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: Elegast on November 30, 2012, 10:34:03 AM
One more interesting quote on Cowl if you wanted to add it.  We get that Cowl has heard of Dresden's ability, but never seen it firsthand.

DB Ch.8

Added.
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: KevinSig on November 30, 2012, 10:36:33 AM
Molly=Mab was fascinating, and came out very close to the truth, but unfortunately it's wrong as Titania is Mab's sister, and Titania is not Molly's sister.

Yeah, which is a shame.  In hindsight, I think Ms Duck saw some of the signs, but jumped to a conclusion that seemed a bit outrageous, to me.  Had she not thrown in the time travel angle & just concentrated on the fact that Molly was being prepared for Winter, it might have seen more traction & not have been discounted out of hand.

If Mab were Molly, she'd at least have gotten the Princess Bride quote.
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: madness on November 30, 2012, 10:39:10 AM
He sends the Outsider influenced Ghouls into the Wraith Deeps in White Night.

I don't remember the Ghouls being Outsider influenced.  Only Vittorio from what I can recall.
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: Elegast on November 30, 2012, 10:46:19 AM
Yeah, which is a shame.  In hindsight, I think Ms Duck saw some of the signs, but jumped to a conclusion that seemed a bit outrageous, to me.  Had she not thrown in the time travel angle & just concentrated on the fact that Molly was being prepared for Winter, it might have seen more traction & not have been discounted out of hand.

I think you're right. Time travel is such a powerful tool that  everything becomes possible (Harry=Gatekeeper=Cowl=Merlin=Odin=Santa=Erkling=Titania=Mother Summer. Obviously). We should be very cautious before using it without explicit proof of actual time travel. That's why I don't really buy the Time Travelling Harry fixed LC.
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: KevinSig on November 30, 2012, 10:52:46 AM
I think you're right. Time travel is such a powerful tool that  everything becomes possible (Harry=Gatekeeper=Cowl=Merlin=Odin=Santa=Erkling=Titania=Mother Summer. Obviously). We should be very cautious before using it without explicit proof of actual time travel. That's why I don't really buy the Time Travelling Harry fixed LC.

Yeah, there's WAY too much of the somebody equal somebody else that goes on around here.  To the point, where you really have a hard time not to dimiss all of it.

I can't say I'm entirely faultless, since I'm starting to lean towards the notion that Harry = Merlin the original, but it isn't a firm belief either.
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: Elegast on November 30, 2012, 11:00:45 AM
Yeah, there's WAY too much of the somebody equal somebody else that goes on around here.  To the point, where you really have a hard time not to dimiss all of it.

I can't say I'm entirely faultless, since I'm starting to lean towards the notion that Harry = Merlin the original, but it isn't a firm belief either.

I would say the Cowl=Simon is really reasonable. It's not like we are the ones inventing a secret identity for Cowl: there is a WOJ that Cowl is hiding his real name.

The Harry=Merlin is more outlandish (time-travel, soft evidence), but at least it's not Harry=Gatekeeper or Harry=Cowl or Justin=Cowl, all nearly impossible.
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: craigallen on November 30, 2012, 12:31:53 PM
So wait a minute... you are all saying that Harry is going to end up on American Idol fighting Simon Cowl?

ca
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: knnn on November 30, 2012, 12:59:58 PM
Nice summary!

- Another objection to the Simon=Cowl theory is an interview with Fred where he says that Jim let him have free rein in writing up Simon in the paranet files.  If Simon still has a part to play, Jim would need to retcon or explicitly approve everything Fred puts into the books (e.g. Kumori's real name) in case they should appear in the novels.  Furthermore, I don't see Jim letting such a reveal to come out outside of the novels -- aren't the paranet files supposed to be published soon?  Mind you, I'm not saying this disproves anything, merely that it's a point against the theory.

Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: Elegast on November 30, 2012, 01:16:49 PM
Nice summary!

- Another objection to the Simon=Cowl theory is an interview with Fred where he says that Jim let him have free rein in writing up Simon in the paranet files.  If Simon still has a part to play, Jim would need to retcon or explicitly approve everything Fred puts into the books (e.g. Kumori's real name) in case they should appear in the novels.  Furthermore, I don't see Jim letting such a reveal to come out outside of the novels -- aren't the paranet files supposed to be published soon?  Mind you, I'm not saying this disproves anything, merely that it's a point against the theory.

Thx, I had forgotten that one. Will add it.

I don't find the argument terribly convincing, as the paranet files are focused on the Russian revolution, so probably many years before Simon was infected. And it wouldn't reveal anything, just flesh out what is already known. But Kumori's name would definitely have to be approved.
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: Silkki on December 01, 2012, 12:37:38 PM
we know that Cowl is a human SC-level wizard, so the list of suspect is very short:
  • Langtry
  • Rashid
  • Eb
  • Lafortier
  • Mai
  • Martha
  • LTW
  • Simon Petrovich
  • Klaus Schneider (the Toymaker)

During Dead Beat the SC was fighting the Reds. So we have two possibilities: Simon or Klaus.


You perople are underestimating the WC. Remember Ebaneezer was way down the line, and that there were loads of different names, every1 absent before they got down in the list down to him when he entered the SC. So there are loads of wizards of SC level out there that simply haven't entered SC due politics.

(Or am I completely wrong here?)
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: Elegast on December 01, 2012, 10:46:11 PM
You perople are underestimating the WC. Remember Ebaneezer was way down the line, and that there were loads of different names, every1 absent before they got down in the list down to him when he entered the SC. So there are loads of wizards of SC level out there that simply haven't entered SC due politics.

(Or am I completely wrong here?)

That's a very sensible question.

However we have a quote saying the SC is peerless in power:
Quote from: Dead Beat
An offensive action like a full assault from the Senior Council, the seven oldest and strongest wizards on the planet, had been long overdue.

So McCoy is in the top 7. However, that's in direct contradiction with this scene:
Quote from: Summer Knight
Peabody reached under his table and came out with a bulging satchel. He muttered something to himself and rubbed some ink onto his nose with one finger, then he opened the satchel, which held what looked like a couple of reams of parchment. His eyes glazed over slightly, and he reached into the papers seemingly at random. He drew out a single page, put it on the desk before him, nodded in satisfaction, then read in a reedy voice, "Wizard Montjoy."
"Research trip in the Yucatán," Martha Liberty said.
Peabody nodded. "Wizard Gomez."
"Still sleeping off that potion," provided a grey-cloaked Warden standing by the wall.
Peabody nodded. "Wizard Luciozzi."
"Sabbatical," said the blue-bearded and tattooed wizard behind me. Ebenezar frowned, and one of his cheeks twitched in a nervous tic.
It went on like that for close to a quarter hour. Some of the more interesting reasons for absence included "He got real married," "Living under the polar ice cap," and "Pyramid sitting," whatever that was.
Peabody finally read, with a glance up at the Merlin, "Wizard McCoy." Ebenezar grunted and stood. Peabody read another half-dozen names before stating, "Wizard Schneider."

That would mean a least a hundred wizards before McCoy on the seniority list.

That's simply not possible, as I cannot see how no one among those one hundred would accept a position as prestigious and powerful as SC member.

In my opinion, there are two ways to reconcile those two scenes:

  - Out-universe: the Summer Knight scene was written as comic relief ('pyramid sitting', 'real married'), and is factually incorrect.

  - In-universe: the nomination to SC is in fact the result of a political struggle behind the scenes, and the seniority list thing is just for show. So there may be a hundred wizards older than McCoy, but none of them had the magical/political power to challenge him for the seat.
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: Silkki on December 01, 2012, 10:56:43 PM
  - In-universe: the nomination to SC is in fact the result of a political struggle behind the scenes, and the seniority list thing is just for show. So there may be a hundred wizards older than McCoy, but none of them had the magical/political power to challenge him for the seat.

Wasnt going to be a Merlins puppet that was going to get in SC and wasn't it engineered by Merlin that every older member was gone due trivial reasons. Either due Merlin giving them some tasks, or simply due Merlin asking them to stay away.

Most wizards probably aren't suited for combat, but there should be several capable of heavy combat duty within those wizards, even if rest of the Council wouldn't know about it. Cowl might be one of the senior members that hasn't stepped up to be SC member or so.
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: Cenphx on December 01, 2012, 10:57:25 PM
Thanks for the list Elegast. It reminded me a set of thoughts I had about Lucciozzi before. 1) adding the suffix -zzi to a last name sometimes occurred in mediterrean countries to indicate a specifc region from which the person hailed. Without it, we have Luccio. 2) Luccio has family to who she mentions she watches over. 3) Lucciozzi is the only name Eb has a visible reaction to and we never findout why.  Is it possible Cowl is a wizard we've never even learned anything about yet? Whether thats true or not, I think that Eb inadvertently f'd up a plan to get a BC/nemesis meber on the SC here (which then gets reworked into the plan killing LaFortier). So I think one of the people on the list ahead of him is Cowl and/or a high level BC/nemesis member.      Edit: I know this is thin, its not a theory, but more of a collection of thoughts that may help in brainstorming.
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: Elegast on December 01, 2012, 11:04:21 PM
Thanks for the list Elegast. It reminded me a set of thoughts I had about Lucciozzi before. 1) adding the suffix -zzi to a last name sometimes occurred in mediterrean countries to indicate a specifc region from which the person hailed. Without it, we have Luccio. 2) Luccio has family to who she mentions she watches over. 3) Lucciozzi is the only name Eb has a visible reaction to and we never findout why.  Is it possible Cowl is a wizard we've never even learned anything about yet? Whether thats true or not, I think that Eb inadvertently f'd up a plan to get a BC/nemesis meber on the SC here (which then gets reworked into the plan killing LaFortier). So I think one of the people on the list ahead of him is Cowl and/or a high level BC/nemesis member.      Edit: I know this is thin, its not a theory, but more of a collection of thoughts that may help in brainstorming.

1) Indeed. There is a quote confirming this:
Quote from: Dead Beat
Holy crap, the boss herself. Anastasia Luccio was one of the next in line for a seat on the Senior Council, and was the commander of the Wardens. She was one tough old bird, and she was the field commander of the Council's forces in the war with the Red Court.

4) It could definitely be a new character. But I trust Klaus the Toymaker, as he has a reputation for honesty, and actually turns down the job twice, in SK and in TC.
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: Silkki on December 01, 2012, 11:17:04 PM
Is it possible Cowl is a wizard we've never even learned anything about yet?

Possible, but quite unlikely. Jim himself has said he does his best to foreshadow things, and having Cowl is TAN DAN TAAA *insert name* moment is one of those things that seem likely to happen.

Having "Cowl removed his hood and he was... generic WC member number 199 i'd seen once in a meeting but had never even mentioned on page" just doesn't cut it.

Hmm! I have a new pet theory that is like 100% sure to happen. Cowl is Malcolm Dresden.

Quote
"Harry... *inhale* I am your father.."
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: Kathryn Rose on December 01, 2012, 11:27:05 PM
Yeah, there's WAY too much of the somebody equal somebody else that goes on around here.  To the point, where you really have a hard time not to dimiss all of it.

Agreed.

Quote
I can't say I'm entirely faultless, since I'm starting to lean towards the notion that Harry = Merlin the original, but it isn't a firm belief either.

I think Harry is probably a descendant of Merlin and there will be some kind of family-coded magic message at some point, which would be another good reason for the RC to try to kill all of Harry's family. (Esp if Merlin is still alive somewhere, like inside Demonreach, for example.)

I voted no, but now that I've read all this, I can see the argument.

And I'm glad I'm not the only one who thinks of American Idol when I see Simon=Cowl. :)   
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: Cenphx on December 01, 2012, 11:27:24 PM
@Silkki--i agree that it wouldnt work to not know anything about the wizard insidethe cowl at te time of the reveal, I guess I was more thinking - is there time before the reveal to build in more info about someone like Lucciozzi or Schneider (which would likely connect up stuff from before we didnt know were clues)? Or does it need to be someone we know more about, just given time constraints? Depending on how many earlier clues we got that we didnt notice or piece together, I think we have time.
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: blackstaff_ on December 01, 2012, 11:28:57 PM
I am thinking simon is my first choice, second is langtry
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: Griffyn612 on December 01, 2012, 11:31:09 PM
Yeah, which is a shame.  In hindsight, I think Ms Duck saw some of the signs, but jumped to a conclusion that seemed a bit outrageous, to me.  Had she not thrown in the time travel angle & just concentrated on the fact that Molly was being prepared for Winter, it might have seen more traction & not have been discounted out of hand.

If Mab were Molly, she'd at least have gotten the Princess Bride quote.

In Lady Anatidae's defense, she proposed several theories on Mab=Molly, one of which was that Molly would become/replace Mab.  By becoming the Winter Lady, Molly is now second to the throne.  And if the end of the series requires Mab to die, which Duck has speculated as well, then with her fall, Molly will become the new Mab.
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: Silkki on December 02, 2012, 12:16:30 AM
Lets keep Molly Mab discussions to those 10 theads made about that already.  ;D

One thing that jumps to mind is that Cowl uses gloves. Might be that his hands have scars like his arms do and he is using gloves to cover them up. (He revealed the scars in his arms only when he was already assured of his ascension to godhood)

My point being, do we know any other characters that have been mentioned to use gloves. Like any wizard, warden, denarian... anything?
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: XoVeR on December 02, 2012, 12:44:22 AM
I hope Simon is Cowel because it would be utterly hilarious that one of the major bad guys in the Dresden verse is the biggest ass hat in TV.

Simon Cowell from American Idol fame.

I can see Jim Butcher doing something like this
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: Griffyn612 on December 02, 2012, 12:56:43 AM
If anything, I'm leaning more toward Cowl being alternate universe Harry.  I've hated that theory for a long while, but I find it more practical than it being Simon.

That being said, I'm still holding out that its Cristos, an unknown wizard, a Fomor, or something else.
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: Kaira on December 12, 2012, 09:04:55 PM
If anything, I'm leaning more toward Cowl being alternate universe Harry.  I've hated that theory for a long while, but I find it more practical than it being Simon.

That being said, I'm still holding out that its Cristos, an unknown wizard, a Fomor, or something else.

I agree, I don't think it makes much sense that Simon = Cowl, or really that any of the 'blank = blank' theories hold much water.  Also, wasn't Simon Russian? Wouldn't Cowl then have a Russian accent? And why would a former SC member be trying to summon Darkhallow and summon Outsiders/ghouls in WN?
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: Elegast on December 12, 2012, 09:09:12 PM
Wouldn't Cowl then have a Russian accent? And why would a former SC member be trying to summon Darkhallow and summon Outsiders/ghouls in WN?

The accent is hard to judge as Cowl has an unnatural voice. And why?
He's infected and wants to save the world (he still sees himself as an altruist).
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: Ms Duck on December 12, 2012, 09:09:18 PM
Im placing a small bet on the lovecraft connection- Cowl is a deep one/ formor. that being said, they can pass for human, with some frog like features. If Simon was Cowl, id think Jim would have had Eb mutter about how much he misses his old bug eyed friend.

Im still putting a bet on wizard Lucciozi, who caused Eb to flinch in SK.
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: Elegast on December 12, 2012, 09:15:04 PM
Im placing a small bet on the lovecraft connection- Cowl is a deep one/ formor. that being said, they can pass for human, with some frog like features. If Simon was Cowl, id think Jim would have had Eb mutter about how much he misses his old bug eyed friend.

A fomor?

How did he summon an Outsider? (no proof but probable)
How did he know about Bob?
Why is a fan of Goethe?
Why does he uses 'Dorosh' as keyword for his magic?
Who was the traitor in Archangel?
Why Harry says he's human?
Why Lea accepted a gift from an enemy?

Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: Phobos on December 12, 2012, 09:20:12 PM
Im still putting a bet on wizard Lucciozi, who caused Eb to flinch in SK.

I think Eb was flinching because he knew his name was next on the list for potential SC members. Something he has turned down several times, if I recall correctly, and he hates the politics.
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: Ms Duck on December 12, 2012, 10:37:11 PM
A fomor?

How did he summon an Outsider? (no proof but probable)hes of mortal blood
How did he know about Bob?saw him in GP
Why is a fan of Goethe?why not?
Why does he uses 'Dorosh' as keyword for his magic?
Who was the traitor in Archangel?the clerk
Why Harry says he's human?deep ones can pass for human
Why Lea accepted a gift from an enemy?see above
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: ClintACK on December 12, 2012, 11:50:46 PM
That would mean a least a hundred wizards before McCoy on the seniority list.

That's simply not possible, as I cannot see how no one among those one hundred would accept a position as prestigious and powerful as SC member.

I dunno -- I'd imagine most wizards in their second or third century have a lot of things going on in their lives.  Why would they want the hassle of Supreme Council work?  Keep in mind how often the SC members seem to be working at Edinburgh, or on whatever new crisis is facing the White Council.  Think of all the paperwork.

Remember that the "hundred or so" wizards ahead of McCoy on that list didn't show up to the meeting at all.  And why would they?  Some silly war with the Red Court?  A passing nothing to a three hundred year old wizard.

The White Council wizards we meet are all either Senior Council members themselves or wardens (or occasionally random audience members at meetings).  They are *exactly* the wizards who *do* care about the White Council.  I have to believe the vast majority are more like Elaine, except they pay nominal lip service to the Council when they think about it at all, every few decades.

Heck, Ebenezar was involved enough to be the Blackstaff, and he still didn't want to be on the SC -- he'd turned it down several times.  He only joined at this point because Simon was dead, and if Eb hadn't stepped up, Harry would have been killed.  Not hard to believe that most wizards of Eb's generation feel the same way.  Set in their ways and happy to go about their own business without all the hassle.
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: Krika on December 13, 2012, 12:16:23 AM
Cowl is Harry Dresden.

As Simon Cowl? 1 - Very obvious. 2 - Harry does not know Simon. Harry believes that Simon is dead. He (Simon) may not appear in the Council. Why would he need to disguise his voice then? Or even hide from everyone? 3 - The Cowl height is never mentioned (nor Kumori) 4 - Does anyone remember the prostitute in DB, that it was strange looking at Harry. As if she had seen a version minutes before. 5 - Cowl can open paths in Nevernever. As Harry, now. 6 - The magic of Cowl is tarnished. As the magic of Harry.
Cowl is Harry from the future to something we'll find out later.
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: Kaira on December 13, 2012, 03:29:08 AM
Cowl is Harry Dresden.

As Simon Cowl? 1 - Very obvious. 2 - Harry does not know Simon. Harry believes that Simon is dead. He (Simon) may not appear in the Council. Why would he need to disguise his voice then? Or even hide from everyone? 3 - The Cowl height is never mentioned (nor Kumori) 4 - Does anyone remember the prostitute in DB, that it was strange looking at Harry. As if she had seen a version minutes before. 5 - Cowl can open paths in Nevernever. As Harry, now. 6 - The magic of Cowl is tarnished. As the magic of Harry.
Cowl is Harry from the future to something we'll find out later.

I kind of love this theory.  It would be really interesting if at some point Harry changed so much in his life that he kind of....split, much like Evil Bob split off from regular Bob.  And the Winter mantle stayed with the Cowl part. Ooo.

But it would be just like Jim to keep us speculating and then have Cowl actually be a new character




 
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: Amber on December 13, 2012, 04:11:52 AM
My two theories on Cowl - Mirrorverse Harry (Mostly because you just know that he's going to show up at some point) and Justin (Justin - wears gloves because he is burned, voice sounds unnatural because of the fire he got "DED" in.  Almost any Simon argument (strength, knowledge of Bob, knowledge of Kemmler) can be applied to Justin.  About the only argument I've thought of against Justin is that he's supposed to be dead, but, well, dead seems to be somewhat flexible in the Dresdenverse.
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: derrick on December 13, 2012, 04:13:13 AM
One thing that jumps to mind is that Cowl uses gloves. Might be that his hands have scars like his arms do and he is using gloves to cover them up. (He revealed the scars in his arms only when he was already assured of his ascension to godhood)

Here's some relevant quotes:

Quote from: Dead Beat, Chapter 8 (emphasis mine)
Cowl straightened slowly. He'd gotten back to the very rear of the car's impact area somehow, and he must have been able to shield himself from the partial impact. As he straightened he wavered, then braced himself against a streetlight with one black-gloved hand.

Quote from: Dead Beat, Chapter 34 (emphasis mine)
Cowl was silent for a long moment in the rain. Drops fell off the end of my pistol in his gloved hand. Then he said, his voice pensive, "I do not perceive myself to be mad. But if I were truly mad, would I be able to tell?"

Quote from: Dead Beat, Chapter 42 (emphasis mine)
Cowl set the skull aside on the grass, then raised his hands above his head and let the sleeves fall back from his long, weathered arms covered in old scars. He began a chant in a low voice, steady and strong.

And here's this, because we're talking gloves:
Quote from: Dead Beat, Chapter 28 (emphasis mine)
So I was panting and sitting flat on my ass when the air in front of me wavered, and a dark, hooded figure stepped forward from out of nowhere, one hand extended, some sort of fine mesh that covered her outstretched palm flickering with ugly purple light.

"Be very still, Dresden," Kumori said, her voice soft. "If you try to move, I'll kill you."


---

On another note, why Goethe?  Two things come to mind:  Goethe penned Der Erlkönig (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Der_Erlk%C3%B6nig) as well as a celebrated version of Faust (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Faust#Goethe.27s_Faust).  I've always thought that this was a hint that Cowl made a Faustian bargain. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deal_with_the_Devil)
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: wizard nelson on December 13, 2012, 06:43:55 AM
Cowl = Simon is probably the single most sane, rational, and well-supported theory I've seen on these boards. Thanks for laying out the evidence.
jim isn't always sane an rational though. i admit you covered all the bases here, kudos btw. somehow though i still find i can't consign myself to this... besides this would make his name simon cowl! roflmao! unless jim is an avid american idol fan i just can't except that. i'd rather it be bizarro harry an molly.
*snicker* omg simon cowl... has anyone ever got that before? ::) :o
i might never have if i hadn't read the thread name dyslexic like
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: Elegast on December 13, 2012, 12:45:46 PM
Here's some relevant quotes:

And here's this, because we're talking gloves:

---

On another note, why Goethe?  Two things come to mind:  Goethe penned Der Erlkönig (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Der_Erlk%C3%B6nig) as well as a celebrated version of Faust (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Faust#Goethe.27s_Faust).  I've always thought that this was a hint that Cowl made a Faustian bargain. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deal_with_the_Devil)

That's one of my pet theories, but I've never explicitly stated it:

I believe Cowl is based on Darth Vader.  :)

We know that Jim is a HUGE SW fan, that he likes to take ideas from other artists, and Vader is probably the best idea of the whole SW universe.

Vader-Cowl:

So I like your idea that Goethe is reference to Faust, as I believe that Cowl, like Vader is good guy who made a pact with the Bad Guy.
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: wizard nelson on December 13, 2012, 01:01:32 PM
yea jims a total SW geek, nothing wrong with that.. but it practically became modern mythology. how can you create an epic without referencing the classics?
really though nothing on my 'simon cowl' joke? not even lol?
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: Ms Duck on December 13, 2012, 02:51:22 PM
That's one of my pet theories, but I've never explicitly stated it:

I believe Cowl is based on Darth Vader.  :)

We know that Jim is a HUGE SW fan, that he likes to take ideas from other artists, and Vader is probably the best idea of the whole SW universe.

Vader-Cowl:
  • dress in black, and wear black gloves
  • do not show their faces
  • have sustained heavy injuries, including burns
  • have an artificial voice
  • are badass/nearly unkillable (surviving Darkhallow/ explosion of first Death Star)
  • have a secret identity

So I like your idea that Goethe is reference to Faust, as I believe that Cowl, like Vader is good guy who made a pact with the Bad Guy.

One thought on that is that he's not vader, hes hobgoblin. Jim is an old school spider man fan, Harry is based in part on spider man ( magic geek instead of science geek) and for about ten years Spidey had an enemy who was very..mysterious. there were lots of red herrings, lots of random clues, and many suspects.

it later turned out to be  a minor charchter, only mentioned in a few issues, that no one geussed. and the writer planned it that way all along.
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: SunlessNick on December 13, 2012, 04:19:28 PM
Possible, but quite unlikely. Jim himself has said he does his best to foreshadow things, and having Cowl is TAN DAN TAAA *insert name* moment is one of those things that seem likely to happen.

Having "Cowl removed his hood and he was... generic WC member number 199 i'd seen once in a meeting but had never even mentioned on page" just doesn't cut it.
Neither does Petrovich, in that sense.  To reiterate something I've said before:  It tells us the Council was heavily infiltrated, but we knew that; it tells us there's sinisterness in Harry's line of mentorship, but we knew that too, twice over; it implies that whatever agenda is going on with Harry is a bit bigger than just DuMorne's plans, but we knew that too, the only thing Petrovich would add is to potenitally push the time frame back a little.

If the revelation of Cowl's identity is to be a big deal, then I can't see it just filling in the blanks of the past, not being something with implications for the future.

My own theory inasmuch as I have one, is that Cowl is a previous user/victim/ally of a force with which Harry will have to contend, or of which he will have to make use.  A former holder of the Blackstaff, for example, illustrating the risk that comes from it; or another Starborn, illustrating the price of failure or success for Harry.  Or has made a deal with some being Harry will have to make a deal with.

I prefer arguments that can be made in setting, though, and the big one of those for me is that unless Cowl is close to a solo operator, which does not seem to be the case, a place on the Senior Council is too valuable an asset for his faction to give up.

A fomor?

How did he summon an Outsider? (no proof but probable)
How did he know about Bob?
Why is a fan of Goethe?
Why does he uses 'Dorosh' as keyword for his magic?
Who was the traitor in Archangel?
Why Harry says he's human?
Why Lea accepted a gift from an enemy?
Is "Dorosh" a Russian word?  If so, it argues against Petrovch, not for, because wizards have to use words not from their own language.  (Googling it, I've found Russian and Hebrew connections for it).

The others, in order:

Fomor are like fae, yes? In which case, they can produce scions who would presumably face a Choice like changelings do.  Cowl is infected, which we know allows action against a being's nature - by extension, a changeling ought to be able to choose "both" or "both, but one at a time."  That would allow him to do human-only stuff, or seem human.

Can't answer about Bob, but Petrovich would only know if Justin told him - and that is only likely if Petrovich was running Justin, in which case how likely is it that Petrovich would not have taken Bob years ago?

Why not a fan of Goethe?  Do we know Petrovich was a fan of Goethe?

Could still be Petrovich.  Petrovich=Cowl and Petrovich=bad guy on the Black Council or whatever it really is are not synomymous assertions.  Otherwise, could be anyone.

If Cowl had chosen human, Lea might not be able to peg him as a Fomor-scion.


I will say, though, that your OP is the only post I've seen arguing for Petrovich=Cowl that makes it sound even halfway plausible to me.
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: Ms Duck on December 13, 2012, 05:11:23 PM
give me some time and ill come up with one of those ducksims theories for cowl= formor. ill ahve to dig up my lovecraft, since its largely based on that.
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: Elegast on December 13, 2012, 05:26:00 PM
Neither does Petrovich, in that sense.  To reiterate something I've said before:  It tells us the Council was heavily infiltrated, but we knew that; it tells us there's sinisterness in Harry's line of mentorship, but we knew that too, twice over; it implies that whatever agenda is going on with Harry is a bit bigger than just DuMorne's plans, but we knew that too, the only thing Petrovich would add is to potenitally push the time frame back a little.

If the revelation of Cowl's identity is to be a big deal, then I can't see it just filling in the blanks of the past, not being something with implications for the future.

My own theory inasmuch as I have one, is that Cowl is a previous user/victim/ally of a force with which Harry will have to contend, or of which he will have to make use.  A former holder of the Blackstaff, for example, illustrating the risk that comes from it; or another Starborn, illustrating the price of failure or success for Harry.  Or has made a deal with some being Harry will have to make a deal with.

I prefer arguments that can be made in setting, though, and the big one of those for me is that unless Cowl is close to a solo operator, which does not seem to be the case, a place on the Senior Council is too valuable an asset for his faction to give up.
Is "Dorosh" a Russian word?  If so, it argues against Petrovch, not for, because wizards have to use words not from their own language.  (Googling it, I've found Russian and Hebrew connections for it).

The others, in order:

Fomor are like fae, yes? In which case, they can produce scions who would presumably face a Choice like changelings do.  Cowl is infected, which we know allows action against a being's nature - by extension, a changeling ought to be able to choose "both" or "both, but one at a time."  That would allow him to do human-only stuff, or seem human.

Can't answer about Bob, but Petrovich would only know if Justin told him - and that is only likely if Petrovich was running Justin, in which case how likely is it that Petrovich would not have taken Bob years ago?

Why not a fan of Goethe?  Do we know Petrovich was a fan of Goethe?

Could still be Petrovich.  Petrovich=Cowl and Petrovich=bad guy on the Black Council or whatever it really is are not synomymous assertions.  Otherwise, could be anyone.

If Cowl had chosen human, Lea might not be able to peg him as a Fomor-scion.


I will say, though, that your OP is the only post I've seen arguing for Petrovich=Cowl that makes it sound even halfway plausible to me.

I'm almost certain Cowl is human. Harry says so in Dead Beat, and I don't think Jim would mislead us so much.
And his magic seems human: necromancy and Outsider magic seem to be mortal specialities.
That being said, he could be a fomor scion.

Concerning Simon: he left the WC as he intended to destroy it in a few years anyway, and couldn't run the Circle if he had to lead a war for WC at the same time (he was the vampire expert).

"Dorosh" is russian-like, but it's not a russian word. The same way Harry uses "Flickum Bicus", it's a fake word.

Concerning Bob: Simon may have not known about Bob being Justin's, and only learned in PG.

Goethe: we don't know for Simon, but the dates would fit.


Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: 123456789blaaa on December 13, 2012, 06:29:53 PM
It's about time somebody got off their behind and made this thread  ;D (though I do wish I had completed my revised list). Sorry for replying this late, procrastination is my worst enemy  :-[.

Anyways, I've noticed that quite a lot of (circumstantial) evidence from previous threads/my list are missing. I'll post the good ones here after I finish my revised list.

Also:

Quote
as I believe that Cowl, like Vader is good guy who made a pact with the Bad Guy.

I believe this too. It also meshes really nicely if Cowl is Simon since we know that Simon was a trusted friend of Eb. It would give the Circle/BC a lot more depth too.

EDIT: the reason Petrovich didn't take Bob is simply because Harry took it first. Since Lea is protecting Harry (and I would expect a SC member to know about it) he stayed away (plus he was probably busy with lots of other stuff). He could have also tried to steal it and failed (if he didn't know about Lea) and stayed away after that.
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: Sydna on December 13, 2012, 07:20:42 PM
yea jims a total SW geek, nothing wrong with that.. but it practically became modern mythology. how can you create an epic without referencing the classics?
really though nothing on my 'simon cowl' joke? not even lol?

Sorry, that joke has been floating around the bb for years. It was funny the first time.
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: wizard nelson on December 13, 2012, 09:50:33 PM
Sorry, that joke has been floating around the bb for years. It was funny the first time.
darn an i thought i was being original
great minds think alike  8)
seriously though, has anyone considered rashid? he's a frickin giant just like harry.
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: Elegast on December 13, 2012, 09:55:51 PM
seriously though, has anyone considered rashid? he's a frickin giant just like harry.

Yes, and it doesn't work:

Rashid was in the NN fighting outsider when Cowl was in Chicago, Cowl is smaller than Rashid, Rashid does not use Dorosh as a keyword, Rashid had already seen Harry for himself, Rashid is a badass who would have successfully completed the Darkhallow (;)).
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: wizard nelson on December 13, 2012, 10:00:28 PM
whats the significance of dorash? i know cowl uses it, can't remember what for atm...
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: Vondrakenhof on December 13, 2012, 10:46:22 PM
I like the idea of this. It'd be a massive blow to several on the SC if it turned out to be Simon, leaving Harry to deal with him. I think it'd be really cool to see Eb, LTW and Martha Liberty seize up because they realise their old friend had been playing them, with Harry wondering how he's going to take on someone who survived being clocked in the head during the Darkhallow ritual.

On the note of various X=Y theories, are there any threads for Harry = Future Gatekeeper (Taking over once Rashid packs it in). It seems as if he's being groomed for the roll.
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: wizard nelson on December 13, 2012, 10:52:00 PM
I like the idea of this. It'd be a massive blow to several on the SC if it turned out to be Simon, leaving Harry to deal with him. I think it'd be really cool to see Eb, LTW and Martha Liberty seize up because they realise their old friend had been playing them, with Harry wondering how he's going to take on someone who survived being clocked in the head during the Darkhallow ritual.

On the note of various X=Y theories, are there any threads for Harry = Future Gatekeeper (Taking over once Rashid packs it in). It seems as if he's being groomed for the roll.
yea i thought this too. but idk harry aint observant enough to gatekeep.
the biggest support for 'simon cowl' is the woj's about simons death curse and the other about death curses could be synthesised.
i still don't quite agree with it but i don't have any better theories atm.
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: wizard nelson on December 14, 2012, 02:30:38 AM
i just remembered a woj about mouse, he says all the puppies weren't accounted for and another is out there, anyone else think cowl has evil mouse? twisted with mind magic maybe.
it would be kinda cool, i don't go for dog violence in RL (i love my pit:) ) but i wanna see mouse go mono a' mono with his bro, an equal. plus whats the point of throwing that out there if he didn't end up in the wrong hands?
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: Phariah on December 14, 2012, 01:18:12 PM
i really doubt Simon = Cowl. it would be such a let down if it was so easy.

as to him saying he hates Kemmler. it doesn't matter because if he was an evil apprentice of a an evil master mind it goes w/ the evil hat. it usually is a love / hate relationship. he just didn't want to be associated w/ Kemmler because he didn't like how he carried out his plans? his teaching methods? whatever. he does however associate w/ CT and Grevane. he is planning with them while preparing to fight them for the Darkhallow. and they know him. fits with him being an apprentice of Kemmler while hating the guy.

as to being a SC level wizard. just because he is that powerful does not mean he is in the SC. CT and Grevane are considered just as powerful as Cowl. so does that make them SC members?

so what Simon has a female apprentice so does Harry. it has no weight to the theory.
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: wizard nelson on December 14, 2012, 01:29:49 PM
somewhere in DB harry references he's most likely WC as his inside info is so good. i know doesn't prove much. i don't like the 'simon cowl' idea either.. what about cristos though? haven't heard much WAG on that? i still lay down my vote for bizarro harry/molly.... :o OR maybe bizarro thomas? or justin with burns... thomas would be kinda cool plus cowl has pale skin, ain't entirely human, is tall, ect. anyone will do besides 'simon cowl'.... i HATE simon cowl....
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: madness on December 14, 2012, 03:33:05 PM
Grevane was clearly not in the same league as Cowl (Grevane wasn't even in the same league as Corpsetaker, IMO).

Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: 123456789blaaa on December 15, 2012, 07:24:07 AM
i really doubt Simon = Cowl. it would be such a let down if it was so easy.

as to him saying he hates Kemmler. it doesn't matter because if he was an evil apprentice of a an evil master mind it goes w/ the evil hat. it usually is a love / hate relationship. he just didn't want to be associated w/ Kemmler because he didn't like how he carried out his plans? his teaching methods? whatever. he does however associate w/ CT and Grevane. he is planning with them while preparing to fight them for the Darkhallow. and they know him. fits with him being an apprentice of Kemmler while hating the guy.

as to being a SC level wizard. just because he is that powerful does not mean he is in the SC. CT and Grevane are considered just as powerful as Cowl. so does that make them SC members?

so what Simon has a female apprentice so does Harry. it has no weight to the theory.

Do we know that Cowl was a disciple of Kemmler.  Harry calls all 3 of the necromancers "kemmlerites" but we only get explicit confirmation for Grevane (in Dead Beat) and Corpsetaker (in Ghost Story)

Grevane and Corpsetaker are definately not SC level. We have multiple instances of Harry remarking on how powerfull Cowl is and how he would have squished Harry if not for luck but we get no such remarks for the other two necromancers.
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: Second Aristh on December 16, 2012, 12:54:15 AM
Do we know that Cowl was a disciple of Kemmler.  Harry calls all 3 of the necromancers "kemmlerites" but we only get explicit confirmation for Grevane (in Dead Beat) and Corpsetaker (in Ghost Story)

Grevane and Corpsetaker are definately not SC level. We have multiple instances of Harry remarking on how powerfull Cowl is and how he would have squished Harry if not for luck but we get no such remarks for the other two necromancers.
Cowl also implies that he usually had to do the hard work instead of Corpsetaker or Grevane when he released the Erlking from Harry's trap.

I wouldn't be so sure that Grevane and Corpsetaker weren't SC level.  They were stronger than Harry one-on-one, and it didn't seem that they were pulling out all the stops.  Do we have a better way to measure the difference between Harry's strength and a low-end SC member's strength?
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: ff88 on December 16, 2012, 01:38:59 AM
the ice king from adventure' real name is also simon petrovich. hmmmmmmmmmm.....
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: wizard nelson on December 16, 2012, 03:44:35 AM
any direct evidence against rashid being cowl? not supposed actual? the gatekeeper is busy alot which would explain why cowl is hardly ever around, if rashid is cowl then i say maggie is kimori. just a guess. is there any prof directly against cowl rashid though? being in two places at once, that sorta thing? (rashid could probably manage that of course)
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: phoenixjustice on December 16, 2012, 06:45:14 AM
any direct evidence against rashid being cowl? not supposed actual? the gatekeeper is busy alot which would explain why cowl is hardly ever around, if rashid is cowl then i say maggie is kimori. just a guess. is there any prof directly against cowl rashid though? being in two places at once, that sorta thing? (rashid could probably manage that of course)

Height discrepancies for one. Rashid is taller than Harry after all and Cowl isn't described as being taller than Harry or even the same height IIRC.
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: wizard nelson on December 16, 2012, 08:01:48 AM
Height discrepancies for one. Rashid is taller than Harry after all and Cowl isn't described as being taller than Harry or even the same height IIRC.
he's pretty tall, it doesn't give a reference to harrys height though IIRC
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: Tebasile on December 16, 2012, 08:03:52 AM
Okay, have to delurk for that one  ;) :

If Vader=Cowl
Is Cowl Harry's Dad?  ;D


A bit more serious:
I also took the Goethe reference to point toward a Faustian bargain for Cowl.
But I'm German and here Faust is always associated with Goethe (and was the only classic book/play I really liked when reading it in school  ;) )

Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: Ben de Wal on December 16, 2012, 08:10:13 AM
he's pretty tall, it doesn't give a reference to harrys height though IIRC
rashid is tall then Harry cowl shorter we know from woj tha Harry rates people tall the him, shoter then him and a lot shorter and harry being  6 6 or 6 8? not many people are taller then him kinda  easy  if cow=rashid there are only 30 40 wizards who could take him...
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: wizard nelson on December 16, 2012, 08:34:31 AM
rashid is tall then Harry cowl shorter we know from woj tha Harry rates people tall the him, shoter then him and a lot shorter and harry being  6 6 or 6 8? not many people are taller then him kinda  easy  if cow=rashid there are only 30 40 wizards who could take him...
i mean a comparison eg harry is taller or shorter. iirc rashid is taller.
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: TheCuriousFan on December 16, 2012, 09:22:07 AM
any direct evidence against rashid being cowl? not supposed actual? the gatekeeper is busy alot which would explain why cowl is hardly ever around, if rashid is cowl then i say maggie is kimori. just a guess. is there any prof directly against cowl rashid though? being in two places at once, that sorta thing? (rashid could probably manage that of course)

He was busy with the rest of the senior council against the Red Court, does that count?

And IIRC we have WoJ that Margaret's not coming back.
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: wizard nelson on December 16, 2012, 10:20:29 AM
He was busy with the rest of the senior council against the Red Court, does that count?

And IIRC we have WoJ that Margaret's not coming back.
got any direct quotes? he usually doesn't do most council functions...
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: TheCuriousFan on December 16, 2012, 10:38:07 AM
got any direct quotes? he usually doesn't do most council functions...

Quote from: Chapter 31
Luccio nodded. "A major assault. Madrid, Sao Paolo, Acapulco, Athens. We struck at enemy strongholds there to acquire intelligence to the whereabouts of the prisoners. Our people were being held in Belize." She waved a hand vaguely at Morgan.

"Our intelligence indicated the presence of the highest-ranking members of the Red Court, including the Red King himself. The Merlin and the rest of the Senior Council took the field with us," Morgan said quietly.
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: wizard nelson on December 16, 2012, 10:42:30 AM
huh... then why the heck do people think its simon? :o cristo is much better choice? or is my timeline fuddled? intellectus sucks... shoulda asked for x-ray vision 8)
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: TheCuriousFan on December 16, 2012, 10:44:33 AM
huh... then why the heck do people think its simon? :o cristo is much better choice? or is my timeline fuddled? intellectus sucks... shoulda asked for x-ray vision 8)

That quote was to sink the idea that Rashid, Ebenezar, LTW, Langtry, Lafortier, Mai, or Liberty is Cowl. Simon "died" (I personally think he really did die permanently) three years before Dead Beat so isn't included in that statement about the senior council.
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: Arjan on December 16, 2012, 11:05:29 AM
any direct evidence against rashid being cowl? not supposed actual? the gatekeeper is busy alot which would explain why cowl is hardly ever around, if rashid is cowl then i say maggie is kimori. just a guess. is there any prof directly against cowl rashid though? being in two places at once, that sorta thing? (rashid could probably manage that of course)
If Rashid was Cowl there was no need for Cowl. Rashid would let the hordes in and we would be screwed.

The same for Cowl = Mab, Cowl = Mother Summer, .......
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: wizard nelson on December 16, 2012, 11:08:16 AM
If Rashid was Cowl there was no need for Cowl. Rashid would let the hordes in and we would be screwed.

The same for Cowl = Mab, Cowl = Mother Summer, .......
thats not really cowls agenda... who thinks its mab or MS? he's def human...
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: TheCuriousFan on December 16, 2012, 11:11:45 AM
If Rashid was Cowl there was no need for Cowl. Rashid would let the hordes in and we would be screwed.

The same for Cowl = Mab, Cowl = Mother Summer, .......

Or to use a better example, just sabotaged the ward he was making with Langtry and let the Wardens die guaranteeing no interference from them in the darkhallow.
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: Arjan on December 16, 2012, 11:29:39 AM
thats not really cowls agenda... who thinks its mab or MS? he's def human...
I think cowl is human too (and not Fomor) but that is not the point.

The point is that cowl can not be somebody who is already in a position of power big enough to mess everything up forever. The whole cowl persona would be useless.
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: wizard nelson on December 16, 2012, 11:36:20 AM
I think cowl is human too (and not Fomor) but that is not the point.

The point is that cowl can not be somebody who is already in a position of power big enough to mess everything up forever. The whole cowl persona would be useless.
not really, he we don't really know what he really wants, besides godhood. he could be the antihero type. not a nice guy but not ready to let the world burn.
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: Arjan on December 16, 2012, 11:45:13 AM
not really, he we don't really know what he really wants, besides godhood. he could be the antihero type. not a nice guy but not ready to let the world burn.
If I had to point one person in the dresdenfiles to have an infection it would be cowl. The white court putch was a dead giveaway. Cowl wants what nemesis wants.
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: TheCuriousFan on December 16, 2012, 11:45:50 AM
not really, he we don't really know what he really wants, besides godhood. he could be the antihero type. not a nice guy but not ready to let the world burn.

Not after the hex. How many people do you think would die if their cars stopped working mid use? Their pacemakers stopped? Their life support broke? That's a lot of black magic corruption to change one's thinking.

Probably infected though, that could change things like the black magic corruption.
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: wizard nelson on December 16, 2012, 11:51:34 AM
If I had to point one person in the dresdenfiles to have an infection it would be cowl. The white court putch was a dead giveaway. Cowl wants what nemesis wants.
he does ponder this to dresden so he can't be compromised outright.
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: Arjan on December 16, 2012, 12:19:12 PM
he does ponder this to dresden so he can't be compromised outright.
If you believe him but that does not matter much for the argument.
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: wizard nelson on December 16, 2012, 12:23:02 PM
why wouldn't you believe him? he's evil, plenty of evil without nemesis. don't make him stupid
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: Arjan on December 16, 2012, 12:33:47 PM
why wouldn't you believe him? he's evil, plenty of evil without nemesis. don't make him stupid
We know Cowl is not stupid.

I would not believe everything Cowl says. He has a cover to maintain. The white court coup was clearly an attempt to place an infected vittorio as the head of the white court. Lash said he was possessed by an outsider. Judging him by what he does and not by what he said I say outsider infected.
 
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: 123456789blaaa on December 17, 2012, 04:34:57 AM
Cowl also implies that he usually had to do the hard work instead of Corpsetaker or Grevane when he released the Erlking from Harry's trap.

I wouldn't be so sure that Grevane and Corpsetaker weren't SC level.  They were stronger than Harry one-on-one, and it didn't seem that they were pulling out all the stops.  Do we have a better way to measure the difference between Harry's strength and a low-end SC member's strength?

How does him doing all the hard work make him a kemmlerite? He could simply be a normal wizard using necromancy.

I'm really really sure Corpsetaker isn't SC level. Heck, in GS MOLLY was able to hold her off for a pretty significant amount of time. Remember that mind magic is Corpsetakers speciality and we know that SC wizards are super awesome in their areas of speciality (Eb is a direct combat specialist and he was able to cause a freakin earthquake. The Merlin is a ward specialist and he was able to create a ward that held of the ENTIRE Red Court (If I'm remembering correctly) ). Molly should have been squished in an instant. 

We saw that Grevane was charging into battle against Corpsetaker (and she against him) so they clearly thought they could beat each other.

We know Cowl is not stupid.

I would not believe everything Cowl says. He has a cover to maintain. The white court coup was clearly an attempt to place an infected vittorio as the head of the white court. Lash said he was possessed by an outsider. Judging him by what he does and not by what he said I say outsider infected.

I don't see why Cowl can't be infected and be trying to do what he thinks is good at the same time. We saw that Auora was infected and she clearly thought she was doing good. Sure Cowl isn't as insane as her but we've seen that their are varying degrees of infection (cat sith was completely infected for example).
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: wizard nelson on December 17, 2012, 04:55:01 AM
i find it interesting harry later mirrors cowl pondering his own sanity in his office
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: Arjan on December 17, 2012, 05:08:54 AM
I don't see why Cowl can't be infected and be trying to do what he thinks is good at the same time. We saw that Auora was infected and she clearly thought she was doing good. Sure Cowl isn't as insane as her but we've seen that their are varying degrees of infection (cat sith was completely infected for example).
He might think he is doing the good thing if that makes him easier to manage by the outsiders but that does not matter for what he does. For what makes him act.

It is like mind magic. The smart thing is to change just enough so the subject will do what you want him to do. Outright possession is always less efficient and is only to be expected when other options fail.

But the motivations of the infected, the things that really make him move, are the motivations of the outsider managing the infection not the delusions used to keep him under control.

So watch cowls actions, not his words, to see what really makes him move.
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: Second Aristh on December 17, 2012, 05:10:35 AM
How does him doing all the hard work make him a kemmlerite? He could simply be a normal wizard using necromancy.

I'm really really sure Corpsetaker isn't SC level. Heck, in GS MOLLY was able to hold her off for a pretty significant amount of time. Remember that mind magic is Corpsetakers speciality and we know that SC wizards are super awesome in their areas of speciality (Eb is a direct combat specialist and he was able to cause a freakin earthquake. The Merlin is a ward specialist and he was able to create a ward that held of the ENTIRE Red Court (If I'm remembering correctly) ). Molly should have been squished in an instant. 

We saw that Grevane was charging into battle against Corpsetaker (and she against him) so they clearly thought they could beat each other.
Well, if Cowl is complaining about always doing the hard work, he's also implying some level of cooperation with the other Kemmlerites.  Whether or not Cowl was lying is debatable, but you would have to explain why Cowl felt the urge to lie.  My copy of DB is not with me at the moment, but doesn't Cowl say that they "play nice" but are always looking to stab each other in the back to be Kemmler's favorite?

Corpsetaker was also confident in taking on (older & scarier) Luccio and the other wardens.  Besides, Molly wasn't Corpsetaker's first opponent that night.  She had already stalled Harry with shields, taken over Butters, and put the rest of the crew to sleep.  A few more moments and Corpsetaker would have steamrolled over Molly too.

At the very least, Corpsetaker and Grevane are at Morgan's level, and in TC Harry said that Eb (the combat specialist) was one of the few that had a good chance of bringing Morgan in.
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: Ms Duck on December 17, 2012, 05:15:28 AM
id put grevane and corpsteaker at SC level, if not merlin or eb level. both, in there own ways, kicked major arse.

Kemmler was arguably the strongets wizard of the last millenia. HIs 'council members' were likely to match.
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: wizard nelson on December 17, 2012, 05:17:25 AM
id put grevane and corpsteaker at SC level, if not merlin or eb level. both, in there own ways, kicked major arse.

Kemmler was arguably the strongets wizard of the last millenia. HIs 'council members' were likely to match.
none of them had the knowledge in the word though. presumably how to add power by eating shades an what not.
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: Ms Duck on December 17, 2012, 05:28:32 AM
none of them had the knowledge in the word though. presumably how to add power by eating shades an what not.

im not sure grevane and co were the strongest members of Kemmler's group.. more like the ones who survived.

 ;)
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: wizard nelson on December 17, 2012, 05:30:02 AM
im not sure grevane and co were the strongest members of Kemmler's group.. more like the ones who survived.

 ;)
eh? you'd think survival of the fittest?
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: Ms Duck on December 17, 2012, 05:31:34 AM
eh? you'd think survival of the fittest?

its war.

survival of the luckiest.

that, and i suspect the SC went after the ehaviest targets in person and let the wardens do the lesser clean up..easier to get away from.
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: the neurovore of Zur-En-Aargh on December 17, 2012, 04:17:42 PM
its war.
survival of the luckiest.
that, and i suspect the SC went after the ehaviest targets in person and let the wardens do the lesser clean up..easier to get away from.

Ducky dear, if you apply this logic to the Kemmlerites (with which I am entirely in agreement), would you not apply it to the Black Court also ?
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: wizard nelson on December 17, 2012, 04:19:01 PM
Ducky dear, if you apply this logic to the Kemmlerites (with which I am entirely in agreement), would you not apply it to the Black Court also ?
ohhh dissed on your theory...
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: Ms Duck on December 17, 2012, 04:25:37 PM
Ducky dear, if you apply this logic to the Kemmlerites (with which I am entirely in agreement), would you not apply it to the Black Court also ?

probably.

the difference is the black court are extra extra crispy immortal... even a nomral black court master (by the lore) can only be killed at their own grave at dawn... any other damage is simply healed the next night at dusk when they reform.

ive heard many a person here snark about how 'weak' the bC are, that all you need is some garlic or holy water to take one down..

its keeping them down thats hard.  ;D

I allways believed that the BC Elders were imprisoned someplace, or had been put down in a way that they cant get back up normaly. I allways believed it had something to do with demonreach.. but what i wasnt sure.

Now , we know where they are.

 ;D

this isnt a checkov's gun, its a checkov's tactical nuke.
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: wizard nelson on December 17, 2012, 04:35:21 PM
i don't remember were i posted it first, but i found support for my outergates= immortal hell theory. in DB when harry talks to wardens at macs he internal dialogs that the old evil gods were banished there and outsiders are their agents :) if anyone thinks this good start a thread or put in index for me? i gotta sleep... :-\

oh and signs point to donald morgan knowing what mac is A) he knew donalds first name B) morgan is careful to skip over him with his sight ;)
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: knnn on December 17, 2012, 04:40:13 PM
the difference is the black court are extra extra crispy immortal... even a nomral black court master (by the lore) can only be killed at their own grave at dawn... any other damage is simply healed the next night at dusk when they reform.

Huh?

Wasn't one-ear a "Master Vampire"?  Harry burns off his ear in the first encounter, and he doesn't seem to have grown it back by the next night.
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: the neurovore of Zur-En-Aargh on December 17, 2012, 04:44:30 PM
Wasn't one-ear a "Master Vampire"?  Harry burns off his ear in the first encounter, and he doesn't seem to have grown it back by the next night.

I don't think so; the only one I am sure was referred to as a master is whatshername from the Thomas' birthday short story, and I think probably Mavra.
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: knnn on December 17, 2012, 04:45:47 PM
I don't think so; the only one I am sure was referred to as a master is whatshername from the Thomas' birthday short story, and I think probably Mavra.

The conversation with Lara seemed to imply he was going to turn her to a BC.  Isn't that enough to be considered?
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: Ms Duck on December 17, 2012, 04:47:51 PM
yep. we only have two masters..and the one in the short story was a baby.

Now Mavra is either very very good with veils.. or she can body jump... or she thingks napalm comined with explosives is a 'minor nuisance' not worth bothering about.

or all three.

im going by dracula/ carmilla here... I dont know why the white court would pund that stipulation in unless it had some bearing.
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: the neurovore of Zur-En-Aargh on December 17, 2012, 04:50:42 PM
The conversation with Lara seemed to imply he was going to turn her to a BC.  Isn't that enough to be considered?

I don't read it that way; when he says she'll still be pretty for a while, I thought that worked as "strong White Court vampires can survive hanging in the larder feeding Black Court vampires for quite some time, which will be horribly painful, before dying."
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: uncanny on December 17, 2012, 04:50:45 PM
The conversation with Lara seemed to imply he was going to turn her to a BC.  Isn't that enough to be considered?
No... I don't think they need to be a master to turn.  I thought they were the most virulent form - infecting on a gigantic scale I think is the way it was put?  I forget the quote.. books many miles away at home !
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: the neurovore of Zur-En-Aargh on December 17, 2012, 04:52:20 PM
Now Mavra is either very very good with veils.. or she can body jump... or she thingks napalm comined with explosives is a 'minor nuisance' not worth bothering about.

I think her speaking through One-Ear kind of requires some degree of sock-puppetry at a distance rather than just veils.

It may be worth thinking of her sock-puppetry of the Nightmare as another example here.
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: the neurovore of Zur-En-Aargh on December 17, 2012, 04:53:31 PM
No... I don't think they need to be a master to turn.  I thought they were the most virulent form - infecting on a gigantic scale I think is the way it was put?  I forget the quote.. books many miles away at home !

Harry's warning to Murphy about potential exponential growth of Black Court vampires at the start of BR does not sound to me like a master is required to do the turning, either.
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: Elegast on December 17, 2012, 04:56:02 PM
I don't read it that way; when he says she'll still be pretty for a while, I thought that worked as "strong White Court vampires can survive hanging in the larder feeding Black Court vampires for quite some time, which will be horribly painful, before dying."

Quote from: Blood Rites
"Mine," One-ear repeated. It drew Lara's hair back away from her throat. The other vampire took her hands and pinned them against the wall above her head.

One-ear touched its tongue to Lara's mouth and shivered. "I'll show you what real vampires are like. You'll see things differently soon. And you'll be lovely, still. For a little while. I'll enjoy that."

That's not proof, but I understood that he intended to turn her into a black court vampire.
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: Ms Duck on December 17, 2012, 04:56:33 PM
I don't read it that way; when he says she'll still be pretty for a while, I thought that worked as "strong White Court vampires can survive hanging in the larder feeding Black Court vampires for quite some time, which will be horribly painful, before dying."

or you dont have to be a master to turn things.

and wasnt oen eye channeling his master, mavra?
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: the neurovore of Zur-En-Aargh on December 17, 2012, 04:57:46 PM
That's not proof, but I understood that he intended to turn her into a black court vampire.

It would seem to me that going from one of the White Court's alpha predators to a helpless victim would be enough of a change to justify that statement.
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: knnn on December 17, 2012, 04:58:09 PM
or you dont have to be a master to turn things.

and wasnt oen eye channeling his master, mavra?

No, "Sock Puppet" was a different entity than "One eye" in that scene.
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: Ms Duck on December 17, 2012, 04:59:29 PM
No, "Sock Puppet" was a different entity than "One eye" in that scene.

ahh ok.

still we have no evidence outside of the game manual that says a BC must be a master to turn people. personaly, I belive thats how a BC becomes a master.
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: 123456789blaaa on December 18, 2012, 03:41:02 AM
Well, if Cowl is complaining about always doing the hard work, he's also implying some level of cooperation with the other Kemmlerites.  Whether or not Cowl was lying is debatable, but you would have to explain why Cowl felt the urge to lie.  My copy of DB is not with me at the moment, but doesn't Cowl say that they "play nice" but are always looking to stab each other in the back to be Kemmler's favorite?

Corpsetaker was also confident in taking on (older & scarier) Luccio and the other wardens.  Besides, Molly wasn't Corpsetaker's first opponent that night.  She had already stalled Harry with shields, taken over Butters, and put the rest of the crew to sleep.  A few more moments and Corpsetaker would have steamrolled over Molly too.

At the very least, Corpsetaker and Grevane are at Morgan's level, and in TC Harry said that Eb (the combat specialist) was one of the few that had a good chance of bringing Morgan in.

Why can't he be cooperating with the kemmlerites while not being a kemmlerite himself? I don't have DB either so I can't answer your second question.

Can someone  who has the books give a quote?

I think one of the problems with this discussion is that we don't really know what "SC" level power is so how can we tell if a given characters power level is SC level?

We have only seen two  SC members in action: the merlin and Eb. When I think SC level I think of what they have been shown to do in their specialties. I think that if Corpsetaker or Grevane were as powerfull as them in their specialites then Harry and the wardens would have been squished immediately.  I personally think that Corpsetaker and Grevane are Morgan level.
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: cedz on December 20, 2012, 04:50:48 AM
I really like the Cowl is a formorian (or scion of said race) theory considering some of the subtle clues that have happened whenever he is onscreen. One particular discription has stuck with me recently since I did a re-read of Dead Beat:

Quote
Quote from Dead Beat:

Cowl's fingers formed into a rigid claw and he snarled a word I couldn't quite hear, slashing at the air.
There was a surge of power, darker this time, somehow more nebulous. The air around them blurred, there was the sudden scent of mildew and lightless waters, a sighing sound, and as quickly as that, they were simply gone.

The use of the words 'dark' and 'nebulous' to describe the feel of his power, as well as the description of a sudden scent of mildew and lightless waters suggests dark watery depths. Sounds quite formorian in feel to me. It's not definitive but it sure is suspicious when added to some of the other evidence provided.

This doesn't neccessarily discount Cowl being Simon as it might be that he made a deal (Faustian bargain anyone?) with the Formorians for power and they may have altered him physically as well which would account for his warbling non-human voice and how he appeared physically in White Knight.

Lastly Cowl's power has been described by Dresden as being 'cold' but not greasy on multiple occasions. Since during Dead Beat Dresden was dealing with multiple necromancers, he may have just assumed that Cowl's power was also necromantic in nature as apposed to something else that felt very similar (ie formorian flavoured power) just because that's what he was expecting and the power pretty much met all the prerequisites for necromancers (cold, dark, and opposite of how his own power feels). Funnily enough it seems like Cowl didn't actually do any overt necromancy that I can tell during that book other than the ritual at the end. His other ritual was to take out the power in Chicago which seems more neutral than necromantic to me.

Still it's just a theory.
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: phoenixjustice on December 20, 2012, 07:04:38 AM
Welp, considering what we know about Nemesis now, I'd say there's a huge possibility that Cowl is infected. In fact, the whole discovery just makes it more likely that Cowl is Simon; explains how someone so trusted would go turn coat and nuke Archangel the way he did. Have we ever gotten a WoJ on what kind of magic Simon uses? (summon: Serack!) 

This quote from Dead Beat makes a real strong argument for Simon = Cowl:

Quote
"Right," I said. "You're the correct madman for the job."
Cowl was silent for a long moment in the rain. Drops fell off the end of my pistol in his gloved hand. Then he said, his voice pensive, "I do not perceive myself to be mad. But if I were truly mad, would I be able to tell?"

And I think that Cowl took a power-up/mantle from the Fomor--would explain the voice.
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: madness on December 20, 2012, 07:16:05 AM
Welp, considering what we know about Nemesis now, I'd say there's a huge possibility that Cowl is infected. In fact, the whole discovery just makes it more likely that Cowl is Simon; explains how someone so trusted would go turn coat and nuke Archangel the way he did. Have we ever gotten a WoJ on what kind of magic Simon uses? (summon: Serack!) 

This quote from Dead Beat makes a real strong argument for Simon = Cowl:

And I think that Cowl took a power-up/mantle from the Fomor--would explain the voice.

Or Cowl/Simon was necromancered back by Kumori (after Archangel) and that explains his voice and his scars.
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: phoenixjustice on December 20, 2012, 07:53:10 AM
Or Cowl/Simon was necromancered back by Kumori (after Archangel) and that explains his voice and his scars.

Also very possible, though I've always assumed that the scars were from what happened at Archangel.
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: Serack on December 20, 2012, 12:56:07 PM
Welp, considering what we know about Nemesis now, I'd say there's a huge possibility that Cowl is infected. In fact, the whole discovery just makes it more likely that Cowl is Simon; explains how someone so trusted would go turn coat and nuke Archangel the way he did. Have we ever gotten a WoJ on what kind of magic Simon uses? (summon: Serack!) 

This quote from Dead Beat makes a real strong argument for Simon = Cowl:

And I think that Cowl took a power-up/mantle from the Fomor--would explain the voice.

Pretty sure the only time I've seen Simon mentioned in a WoJ is the one that implies that Simon's death curse at Archangel was "Die"

Or Cowl/Simon was necromancered back by Kumori (after Archangel) and that explains his voice and his scars.

Oh I like this.
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: knnn on December 20, 2012, 01:04:44 PM
Or Cowl/Simon was necromancered back by Kumori (after Archangel) and that explains his voice and his scars.

So what happens if you cast a Death Curse while you are under the effect of a "ward off death" spell?
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: 123456789blaaa on December 20, 2012, 01:36:14 PM
So what happens if you cast a Death Curse while you are under the effect of a "ward off death" spell?

Have we seen any examples of "ward of death" spells? Do they even exist? If they exist than why don't more people use them instead of relying on shields and enchanted items for protection?
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: madness on December 20, 2012, 01:48:24 PM
So what happens if you cast a Death Curse while you are under the effect of a "ward off death" spell?

Not sure what you mean.

Are you suggesting that Kumori kept him 'not dead' like she did for Marcone's thug?  I guess that is possible but it makes the casting of death curses a little less likely, IMO, and also takes away some of the potential fun of letting us see a partially botched necromantic resurrection.

I wonder what would happen if you used necromancy to make his dead body a homunculus for either his soul or his ghost?  Basically zombie his body but then dump his soul/ghost back into it.  It would probably allow him to retain his skill and power magically speaking (instead of having to relearn it like Luccio and Corpsetaker had to do after their body switching) and the use of a soul (or a ghost spirit) might work as a power source for the zombie body (allowing it to exist permanently and without a drummer or a beat to follow).

The way I had it playing out in my head is that Simon DID die (and cast his death curse) at Archangel (and he possibly took one or more death curses there as well...either from the traitor or because he WAS the traitor) and that Kumori escaped with his body and either brought him back herself or made a deal with the Kemmlerites to bring him back (thus explaining his providing aid to them during the run up to the Dark Hallow).
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: madness on December 20, 2012, 01:49:30 PM
Have we seen any examples of "ward of death" spells? Do they even exist? If they exist than why don't more people use them instead of relying on shields and enchanted items for protection?

After thinking about it a bit I think that he might be referencing what Kumori did to ward off the death of Marcone's goon long enough for the paramedics to arrive.
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: knnn on December 20, 2012, 01:53:17 PM
After thinking about it a bit I think that he might be referencing what Kumori did to ward off the death of Marcone's goon long enough for the paramedics to arrive.

^yup^

I'm also thinking about those uber-ghouls in the Deeps.  Sure, they had super healing power, but drops of blood coming together and reforming is a little much.  Instead, what if there was a "ward off death" spell cast on them, keeping them alive until their natural healing powers could kick in.
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: madness on December 20, 2012, 02:02:11 PM
^yup^

I'm also thinking about those uber-ghouls in the Deeps.  Sure, they had super healing power, but drops of blood coming together and reforming is a little much.  Instead, what if there was a "ward off death" spell cast on them, keeping them alive until their natural healing powers could kick in.

Anything is possible but the way that the scene is written it doesn't seem so odd that they are like sabretooth tigers, direwolves, giant short-faced bears or malks - ancient and mythologically powerful versions of modern killers.

Regular ghouls have incredible healing powers and the Red King basically did something similar when Harry amputated his arm.  So none of the abilities displayed by the super ghouls is really unprecedented - the strength of their powers is just amplified.
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: Ms Duck on December 20, 2012, 02:03:25 PM
Anything is possible but the way that the scene is written it doesn't seem so odd that they are like sabretooth tigers, direwolves, giant short-faced bears or malks - ancient and mythologically powerful versions of modern killers.

Regular ghouls have incredible healing powers and the Red King basically did something similar when Harry amputated his arm.  So none of the abilities displayed by the super ghouls is really unprecedented - the strength of their powers is just amplified.

I figured it was a call out of sorts to the classic troll, which can only be killed by fire. everythign else heals in minutes :)
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: madness on December 20, 2012, 02:14:07 PM
I figured it was a call out of sorts to the classic troll, which can only be killed by fire. everythign else heals in minutes :)

Yeah, the whole "proto-creature from the dawn of time and darkest depths of human memory" vibe really suited the super ghouls. 

Since multiple sources indicate that there is an almost endless amount of odd places/creatures in the Nevernever and since we mostly only see those that are close to the mortal world (and only a small portion of those even) I never really had any reason to look any deeper into the origins of the super ghouls.

I do really hope that we find out how in the hell Cowl managed contact and control such ancient powerful creatures though.  Eb pulling the Kenku out of his arse is the only other example we have of wizards summoning or leading really exotic and cool beings from the Nevernever.
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: 123456789blaaa on December 20, 2012, 02:39:09 PM
Yeah, the whole "proto-creature from the dawn of time and darkest depths of human memory" vibe really suited the super ghouls. 

Since multiple sources indicate that there is an almost endless amount of odd places/creatures in the Nevernever and since we mostly only see those that are close to the mortal world (and only a small portion of those even) I never really had any reason to look any deeper into the origins of the super ghouls.

I do really hope that we find out how in the hell Cowl managed contact and control such ancient powerful creatures though.  Eb pulling the Kenku out of his arse is the only other example we have of wizards summoning or leading really exotic and cool beings from the Nevernever.

What about Binder? the minions he summoned weren't that powerful but (IMO) were certainly exotic and cool.
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: knnn on December 20, 2012, 03:09:17 PM
There was also the guy who summoned the spiders on the island.
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: 123456789blaaa on December 20, 2012, 03:11:08 PM
We also mustn't forget the demon Victor Sells summoned.
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: madness on December 20, 2012, 05:10:27 PM
All of those seem like random "summon a known demon or common minions from Faerie" types of things though.

Not "I saved some Sidhe noble's ass 200 years ago so he hooked me with a private army" things. ;)
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: wizard nelson on December 20, 2012, 06:38:13 PM
haven't seen this in any threads yet so i was wondering if anyone made the connection between cowl having ghouls at his beck and call and the ghouls showing at luccio's boot camp? which iirc was known by a very limited number of people, none of which was a dead wizard named simon :P i'd have to look but a woj says cowls super ghouls and why he'd have command of them was important.
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: the neurovore of Zur-En-Aargh on December 20, 2012, 08:08:32 PM
haven't seen this in any threads yet so i was wondering if anyone made the connection between cowl having ghouls at his beck and call and the ghouls showing at luccio's boot camp? which iirc was known by a very limited number of people, none of which was a dead wizard named simon :P

If Simon were Cowl, why would he not have access to information via Peabody ?
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: wizard nelson on December 20, 2012, 08:14:44 PM
If Simon were Cowl, why would he not have access to information via Peabody ?
peabody wasn't on that list...
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: the neurovore of Zur-En-Aargh on December 20, 2012, 08:17:08 PM
peabody wasn't on that list...

Not officially, no, but it's made clear in TC that Peabody has had access to all this sort of paperwork and nobody's ever thought to mention it.  They seem to think of him as barely more than a photocopier and filing system.
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: wizard nelson on December 20, 2012, 08:21:16 PM
Not officially, no, but it's made clear in TC that Peabody has had access to all this sort of paperwork and nobody's ever thought to mention it.  They seem to think of him as barely more than a photocopier and filing system.
it wasn't on the books, generally you don't write down super secret locations an what not. cause other people can steal the paper... what it points to is cowl being inside the WC and probably who showed with an army of spiders, standing in a way and unleashing an army seems to be part of his M.O.
also peabody had the same musty smell on him as cowl, probably from hanging around him.
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: madness on December 20, 2012, 09:49:50 PM
There would be requisitions and correspondence.

It is pretty heavily implied at the end of Turn Coat that Peabody had access to all of the leaked information and that everyone overlooked him since he was basically just the court stenographer during meetings.

Even if he wasn't involved in all of the Senior Council meetings he was probably able to piece a lot of things together when they ended the meetings and the Senior Council members promptly began issuing various orders.
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: cedz on December 21, 2012, 12:01:28 AM
Regarding the WOJ which talks about Simon and a death curse:

Quote
See what happened to all the vampires around Simon when they assaulted his compound immediately prior to the onstage events in Summer Knight.

Note that Jim doesn't actually state that Simon cast this death curse nor that he died. He just specifically pointed to all the vampires dying around him. Another way to look at this quote considering we know that Cowl has survived death curses before is that this particular death curse wasn't cast by Simon but at him and all the vampires that happened to be around him. He managed to defend against the curse but vampires were obliterated. This chain of logic could work if one of the wizards of Archangel recognised Simon as the traitor who let the Red's bypass the formidable wards and decided to try and take him down as a last ditched effort.

We also know that Simon had a female apprentice which fits really well as being Kumori.
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: Sydna on December 21, 2012, 12:06:43 AM
Regarding the WOJ which talks about Simon and a death curse:

Note that Jim doesn't actually state that Simon cast this death curse nor that he died. He just specifically pointed to all the vampires dying around him. Another way to look at this quote considering we know that Cowl has survived death curses before is that this particular death curse wasn't cast by Simon but at him and all the vampires that happened to be around him. He managed to defend against the curse but vampires were obliterated. This chain of logic could work if one of the wizards of Archangel recognised Simon as the traitor who let the Red's bypass the formidable wards and decided to try and take him down as a last ditched effort.

We also know that Simon had a female apprentice which fits really well as being Kumori.

I don't recall anything about Simon having a female apprentice?
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: cedz on December 21, 2012, 12:29:25 AM
I don't recall anything about Simon having a female apprentice?

We know that Simon had a female apprentice named Larisa Yevtushenko from both the paranet files and I think from either one of the books or a WOJ. I can't seem to track down the book quote at this time though. She is mentioned directly in an excert from the Paranet files at this site though - http://www.evilhat.com/home/paranet-papers-sneak-peek-novgorod-4/
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: Cenphx on December 21, 2012, 01:17:17 AM
We also know that Morgan had some sort of relationsip/connection to her (though I dont remember where I learned this) which helps explain some of his extreme animosity to Harry in SK.
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: TheCuriousFan on December 21, 2012, 01:22:58 AM
We also know that Morgan had some sort of relationsip/connection to her (though I dont remember where I learned this) which helps explain some of his extreme animosity to Harry in SK.

Actually, all we know is that someone dear to him died at Archangel. We think it's Larisa though.
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: the neurovore of Zur-En-Aargh on December 21, 2012, 03:00:49 AM
Actually, all we know is that someone dear to him died at Archangel. We think it's Larisa though.

That actually finally makes sense of that.

(Before TC, I was very into Morgan and Simon as the great secret romance of the DV and a Cowl/Simon reveal playing off that.)
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: wizard nelson on December 22, 2012, 07:07:13 PM
just to throw a wrench into all you simon cowl shippers:
Also, just afterward Fred mentions that Jim said he didn't have a whole lot down on Simon Pietrovich. On a mythbusting tangent that is another strong hint that Simon is both dead and not a member of the Black Council (if Jim's earlier mention of what Simon's death curse was isn't enough).:
ha! why wouldn't he have alot on him if he's secretly a dark uberwizard?
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: Elegast on December 22, 2012, 07:53:55 PM
Also, just afterward Fred mentions that Jim said he didn't have a whole lot down on Simon Pietrovich.

I hear that a lot. Could anyone point me to the source and/or give me the exact wording?
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: 123456789blaaa on December 23, 2012, 03:59:18 AM
I hear that a lot. Could anyone point me to the source and/or give me the exact wording?

The only thing I can recall like that is that Jim is giving the DFRPG people free reign on Simon's backstory for the Paranet Papers supplement. Here's a link: http://www.evilhat.com/home/paranet-papers-sneak-peek-novgorod-4/
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: knnn on December 23, 2012, 05:55:45 PM
I hear that a lot. Could anyone point me to the source and/or give me the exact wording?

[looks at notes]
Hmmm, it looks like that quote is not as clear cut as I remember it.

It's from a podcast from 2d6 feet in a random direction (http://2d6feet.com/), #56 (from April 2010, I believe).  I have a transcript for the relevant parts (5-7 minute mark), the rest of the hour is not really about the DF.   Serack -- I don't know if you have this down already, so you may want to add it.

Regular font is Fred, bold face is the interviewers.  Fred is talking about how much input Jim had for the new material.

Quote
So, we got a few tidbits from him, we will be getting to invent details; far more detail than we invented for the core books.  Um in a number of cases, but we'll also be drawing from "Hey Jim give us a few bullet points about a particular location".  You know, if we want the people to work for the, the player characters stand in the Nevernever chapter to work for the Gatekeeepr in some capacity, what do we need to know about that, and what came out of that was Jim telling me about where the Gatekeepers demesne is.  Where his domain is, where his private citadel is ensconced somewhere in the Nevernever, and the route to it, and I will reveal that here involves walking across the surface of the moon.

Nice, I mean clearly some sort of magical protection...

So you've got that sort of thing in there, but we've also got things like where Simon Pietrovich, Justin Dumorne's mentor, and the Senior Council member that was a... um... removed from power, shall we say in book four, he clearly lived somewhere in Russia, likely during the Russian Revolution, so we, how much control do we have over him.  {quoting Jim} "Fair amount, I don't really have a lot in mind for him, so obviously I'll want to look at it, what your ideas are, but you can do, you can mess around with that".  So we're like "OK, we're going to make him a friend of the Czar, as the Russian revolution is breaking out and have that, you know, tie his hands a little bit and push some things into a direction the is going to be a problem".

That's pretty cool.  What a terrible terrible set of constraints you have for a licensed product. 

So on the on hand you've got Jim's "I don't really have a lot in mind", but on the other, you've got Fred seemingly avoiding declaring that Simon is dead.
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: 123456789blaaa on December 24, 2012, 04:25:38 AM
[looks at notes]
Hmmm, it looks like that quote is not as clear cut as I remember it.

It's from a podcast from 2d6 feet in a random direction (http://2d6feet.com/), #56 (from April 2010, I believe).  I have a transcript for the relevant parts (5-7 minute mark), the rest of the hour is not really about the DF.   Serack -- I don't know if you have this down already, so you may want to add it.

Regular font is Fred, bold face is the interviewers.  Fred is talking about how much input Jim had for the new material.

So on the on hand you've got Jim's "I don't really have a lot in mind", but on the other, you've got Fred seemingly avoiding declaring that Simon is dead.

...Damn  :(. I can only hope that Jim changes his mind after seeing this thread and decides to make Simon=Cowl in spite of the paranet papers.
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: TheCuriousFan on December 24, 2012, 04:29:41 AM
[looks at notes]
Hmmm, it looks like that quote is not as clear cut as I remember it.

It's from a podcast from 2d6 feet in a random direction (http://2d6feet.com/), #56 (from April 2010, I believe).  I have a transcript for the relevant parts (5-7 minute mark), the rest of the hour is not really about the DF.   Serack -- I don't know if you have this down already, so you may want to add it.

Regular font is Fred, bold face is the interviewers.  Fred is talking about how much input Jim had for the new material.

So on the on hand you've got Jim's "I don't really have a lot in mind", but on the other, you've got Fred seemingly avoiding declaring that Simon is dead.

Saved for future use.
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: Serack on December 24, 2012, 01:30:52 PM
[looks at notes]
Hmmm, it looks like that quote is not as clear cut as I remember it.

It's from a podcast from 2d6 feet in a random direction (http://2d6feet.com/), #56 (from April 2010, I believe).  I have a transcript for the relevant parts (5-7 minute mark), the rest of the hour is not really about the DF.   Serack -- I don't know if you have this down already, so you may want to add it.

Regular font is Fred, bold face is the interviewers.  Fred is talking about how much input Jim had for the new material.

So on the on hand you've got Jim's "I don't really have a lot in mind", but on the other, you've got Fred seemingly avoiding declaring that Simon is dead.

hmmm guess I never listened to that one cause I only added it to the iago interview index in the DFRPG section
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: 123456789blaaa on January 02, 2013, 06:31:05 PM
You say "and yet he already has in GP...)." but I don't recall him ever actually meeting Harry at the party. He was present there yes but I don't recall him seeing any of Harry's abilities.
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: TheCuriousFan on January 02, 2013, 06:59:45 PM
You say "and yet he already has in GP...)." but I don't recall him ever actually meeting Harry at the party. He was present there yes but I don't recall him seeing any of Harry's abilities.

Unless he got out of there really quickly he probably saw Harry vs the vamps (assuming you're talking about Cowl seeing Harry in action).
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: 123456789blaaa on January 02, 2013, 07:35:20 PM
Unless he got out of there really quickly he probably saw Harry vs the vamps (assuming you're talking about Cowl seeing Harry in action).

I am.

My memory is foggy. What did Harry do to the vamps during the fight?
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: madness on January 02, 2013, 08:15:17 PM
I am.

My memory is foggy. What did Harry do to the vamps during the fight?

Harry tossed out what was probably his coolest fire spell EVER.

It wouldn't surprise me if it was a death curse powered spell of some sort (since his heart stopped and Michael had to revive him).

It was like a living fire spell that would jump from one vamp to another and engulf them.  Sort of like a fire snake (constrictor) spell or something.  It was unlike anything that he has used since in many ways.
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: madness on January 02, 2013, 08:20:40 PM
As much as I like the Simon = Cowl theory...

My most recent re-read of the series has me leaning much more strongly towards the 'Cowl is some sort of Fomor knight or Fomor ally' theory.

Probably the most important factor is that Cowl's various (confusing) motivations are more easily explained if they are taken as part of an overall Fomor strategy.

Both the Fomor and the Outsiders would need to destroy the existing supernatural powers (especially the Sidhe).  The same alliance(s) that fought the Black Court could reasonably be expected to oppose the return to power of the Fomor and thus would be obvious targets for the Fomor (and the Outsiders benefit from EVERYONE getting weaker).

A re-read of Dead Beat while specifically thinking about a Cowl = Simon theory made that theory more difficult to swallow as well.
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: 123456789blaaa on January 02, 2013, 08:39:53 PM
Harry tossed out what was probably his coolest fire spell EVER.

It wouldn't surprise me if it was a death curse powered spell of some sort (since his heart stopped and Michael had to revive him).

It was like a living fire spell that would jump from one vamp to another and engulf them.  Sort of like a fire snake (constrictor) spell or something.  It was unlike anything that he has used since in many ways.

Hmmm...so either Cowl left early or he didn't see the maybe-Death Curse as an example of why Harry was making the Wardens so nervous (Perhaps Harry didn't make the Wardens nervous before GP?).
 
As much as I like the Simon = Cowl theory...

My most recent re-read of the series has me leaning much more strongly towards the 'Cowl is some sort of Fomor knight or Fomor ally' theory.

Probably the most important factor is that Cowl's various (confusing) motivations are more easily explained if they are taken as part of an overall Fomor strategy.

Both the Fomor and the Outsiders would need to destroy the existing supernatural powers (especially the Sidhe).  The same alliance(s) that fought the Black Court could reasonably be expected to oppose the return to power of the Fomor and thus would be obvious targets for the Fomor (and the Outsiders benefit from EVERYONE getting weaker).

A re-read of Dead Beat while specifically thinking about a Cowl = Simon theory made that theory more difficult to swallow as well.

I'm don't quite get what you're saying here. Why can't Cowl be Simon and be an ally of the Fomor?

Also can you be more specific as to why re-reading of Dead Beat while specifically thinking about a Cowl = Simon theory made that theory more difficult to swallow? 
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: phoenixjustice on January 02, 2013, 08:51:24 PM
It wouldn't surprise me if it was a death curse powered spell of some sort (since his heart stopped and Michael had to revive him).


Agree. Especially since I believe I was the first one to bring up the possibility. :P I used it to help strengthen the Simon is Cowl argument; because if what Harry used was a Death Curse, it shows that a wizard can use a Death Curse and survive it. So Simon could have used a Death Curse and still survived.

And left Archangel to take up a new identity...? ;D
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: 123456789blaaa on January 02, 2013, 08:54:15 PM


Agree. Especially since I believe I was the first one to bring up the possibility. :P I used it to help strengthen the Simon is Cowl argument; because if what Harry used was a Death Curse, it shows that a wizard can use a Death Curse and survive it. So Simon could have used a Death Curse and still survived.

And left Archangel to take up a new identity...? ;D

Recall that Harry needed Micheals help. Cowl would probably have needed Kumori's help.
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: peregrine on January 02, 2013, 09:22:54 PM
Harry tossed out what was probably his coolest fire spell EVER.

It wouldn't surprise me if it was a death curse powered spell of some sort (since his heart stopped and Michael had to revive him).

It was like a living fire spell that would jump from one vamp to another and engulf them.  Sort of like a fire snake (constrictor) spell or something.  It was unlike anything that he has used since in many ways.
That was because it was a spell Kravos had.  I assume you're talking about when Susan had to revive him after he used his ghost to double team the nightmare Kravos?

Yeah, that's not a death curse.  It's called a death curse because it kills you, using all you've got to fuel it, leaving no energy left to maintain yourself.  Harry had done the dead part first, if he did a death curse again, he'd have died, again.
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: knnn on January 02, 2013, 09:35:49 PM
That was because it was a spell Kravos had.  I assume you're talking about when Susan had to revive him after he used his ghost to double team the nightmare Kravos?

No, he's talking about the fire spell Harry uses in the middle of the book - right at the end of the masquerade.  Harry's heart stops and Michael revives him.
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: peregrine on January 02, 2013, 09:44:20 PM
No, he's talking about the fire spell Harry uses in the middle of the book - right at the end of the masquerade.  Harry's heart stops and Michael revives him.
Ah, now I see.

I still don't think it's that easy to cast and survive a death curse, but I could see the argument.  I'd look more for the rage of Harry, plus the effects of the vampire venom causing his heart to give out on him after such an exertion than a proper death cursing, but the principle is very similar, I'm sure.
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: madness on January 02, 2013, 09:57:25 PM
Ah, now I see.

I still don't think it's that easy to cast and survive a death curse, but I could see the argument.  I'd look more for the rage of Harry, plus the effects of the vampire venom causing his heart to give out on him after such an exertion than a proper death cursing, but the principle is very similar, I'm sure.

If I had to go on record I would say that it wasn't a full death curse.

More like a "used so much magic that it killed him" curse rather than a formal death curse.  This could well be another one of those "shades of grey" issues that mortals have trouble with (death, evil, free will, souls, etc.).

Rather than putting ALL of his spirit (or whatever) into the curse like he would a death curse my guess is that he just put some of his spirit into it (a small enough amount that there was something left of his spirit to reinhabit his body when Michael did CPR).  Sort of like he uses bits of his soul when using soul-fire.
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: 123456789blaaa on January 02, 2013, 10:06:07 PM
If I had to go on record I would say that it wasn't a full death curse.

More like a "used so much magic that it killed him" curse rather than a formal death curse.  This could well be another one of those "shades of grey" issues that mortals have trouble with (death, evil, free will, souls, etc.).

Rather than putting ALL of his spirit (or whatever) into the curse like he would a death curse my guess is that he just put some of his spirit into it (a small enough amount that there was something left of his spirit to reinhabit his body when Michael did CPR).  Sort of like he uses bits of his soul when using soul-fire.

I'm inclined to think it was a full death curse because the effect was like something we've never seen before (and we have a WoJ that death curses have a quality that makes them stand out from merely supercharged spells).
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: madness on January 02, 2013, 10:07:02 PM
Hmmm...so either Cowl left early or he didn't see the maybe-Death Curse as an example of why Harry was making the Wardens so nervous (Perhaps Harry didn't make the Wardens nervous before GP?).
 
I'm don't quite get what you're saying here. Why can't Cowl be Simon and be an ally of the Fomor?

Also can you be more specific as to why re-reading of Dead Beat while specifically thinking about a Cowl = Simon theory made that theory more difficult to swallow?

1)  My guess is that Cowl and Kumori were smart enough to get the heck out of Dodge once the violence kicked off.  The whole point of using proxies is that you avoid taking physical risks yourself.

2)  There is no definite reason that I can think of that Cowl could not be Simon as well as a servant of the Fomor. 

3)  A more careful re-read of Dead Beat left me with the impression that Cowl had worked with Kemmler and/or the Kemmlerites before and had a relationship with them going way back before Archangel.  It is possible that this could still apply to Simon but it just doesn't quite feel right.

They treat him as a peer of sorts but not as an intense rival (like they treat each other).  This makes me think that he is an ally but an outsider (not a Kemmlerite).  If you look at the Kemmlerites as filling the same role as Vittorio or Bianca I think that it feels similar.  An outside power offering assistance and the idiots taking the power not being smart enough to realize that they are being played.
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: madness on January 02, 2013, 10:08:02 PM
I'm inclined to think it was a full death curse because the effect was like something we've never seen before (and we have a WoJ that death curses have a quality that makes them stand out from merely supercharged spells).

The unique and complex nature of the spell was the tip-off for me as well.  Not to mention that he was suicidal and drawing power when he should have had none.
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: 123456789blaaa on January 02, 2013, 10:14:39 PM
1)  My guess is that Cowl and Kumori were smart enough to get the heck out of Dodge once the violence kicked off.  The whole point of using proxies is that you avoid taking physical risks yourself.

2)  There is no definite reason that I can think of that Cowl could not be Simon as well as a servant of the Fomor. 

3)  A more careful re-read of Dead Beat left me with the impression that Cowl had worked with Kemmler and/or the Kemmlerites before and had a relationship with them going way back before Archangel.  It is possible that this could still apply to Simon but it just doesn't quite feel right.

They treat him as a peer of sorts but not as an intense rival (like they treat each other).  This makes me think that he is an ally but an outsider (not a Kemmlerite).  If you look at the Kemmlerites as filling the same role as Vittorio or Bianca I think that it feels similar.  An outside power offering assistance and the idiots taking the power not being smart enough to realize that they are being played.

2) I personally don't think he's a servant of the Fomor. I beleive that he is a (high ranking) servant of the Circle and the Circle as a whole are allied with the Fomor. This explains how he can have the portals with the marshy,wet smell and have the warbling voice that is possibly caused by Fomor grafts while not being a servant of the Fomor.

3) i also think he has worked with the Kemmlerites before (but not Kemmler). I think that he did so on the orders of the Circle.

 I saw them as treating him as an enemy ( I think they treated each other that way too).  What makes you think that they treated him as a peer but not an intense rival?
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: Arjan on January 02, 2013, 10:47:23 PM
2) I personally don't think he's a servant of the Fomor. I beleive that he is a (high ranking) servant of the Circle and the Circle as a whole are allied with the Fomor. This explains how he can have the portals with the marshy,wet smell and have the warbling voice that is possibly caused by Fomor grafts while not being a servant of the Fomor.

3) i also think he has worked with the Kemmlerites before (but not Kemmler). I think that he did so on the orders of the Circle.

 I saw them as treating him as an enemy ( I think they treated each other that way too).  What makes you think that they treated him as a peer but not an intense rival?
I think Cowl is just an unlucky powerful white council member who got infected and now works for Nemesis. Probably not one we have seen much and certainly not Simon. Simon is dead.
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: 123456789blaaa on January 02, 2013, 10:55:35 PM
I think Cowl is just an unlucky powerful white council member who got infected and now works for Nemesis. Probably not one we have seen much and certainly not Simon. Simon is dead.

Would you care to present your arguments?
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: Arjan on January 02, 2013, 11:21:38 PM
Would you care to present your arguments?
For Simons dead I trust what is said about it in Summer Knight and the woj about his dead curse. Simon as traitor would not have left the white council, he was in too good a position to do loads of damage. Or, if he was behind the fall of Archangel he could have delivered the fortress without too much struggle and arranged for wizards captives to be turned by the reds. In stead we see dead curses employed.

Cowl is clearly hiding his identity that means he has an identity worth hiding. With his strength in mortal magic, he can apparently summon outsiders, and Harry's feel about his magic I think he is human.his conversations sound human as well.

He was behind Lea's infection and the coup in white night. Both actions For Nemesis. His conversation shows some imbalance that I used to attribute to black magic using but nemesis possession fits the bill as well.
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: 123456789blaaa on January 03, 2013, 02:07:38 AM
For Simons dead I trust what is said about it in Summer Knight and the woj about his dead curse. Simon as traitor would not have left the white council, he was in too good a position to do loads of damage. Or, if he was behind the fall of Archangel he could have delivered the fortress without too much struggle and arranged for wizards captives to be turned by the reds. In stead we see dead curses employed.

Cowl is clearly hiding his identity that means he has an identity worth hiding. With his strength in mortal magic, he can apparently summon outsiders, and Harry's feel about his magic I think he is human.his conversations sound human as well.

He was behind Lea's infection and the coup in white night. Both actions For Nemesis. His conversation shows some imbalance that I used to attribute to black magic using but nemesis possession fits the bill as well.

The WoJ doesn't actually say it was his death curse. It could easily have been a member of the Brute Squad who realized that Simon was Cowl. Not only that but we may also have a precedent in surviving death curses in Harry's pyrofeugo in GP. Cowl may have had Kumori ressurect him after using his death curse (to make it look more realistic to wizard examiners).

Simon is an SC level wizard so he is probably a high ranking member of the Circle and/or a person infected by Nemesis that Nemesis places a high priority on. How much damage could Simon have really done? He was a well known figure in the wizarding community and close friends with Eb and Martha Liberty (and information expert). Not only that but he was far far away from the WC headquarters.

Peabody did far more damage than Simon could ever have done.

Not only that but "dying" did tons of bad stuff to the WC and left him free to pursue the Darkhallow. It makes sense that Nemesis/the Circle would send such a powerfull operative to become a literal GOD. They of course wanted to ensure the best possible chance that they could get the prize.

If he had delvered the fortress without much struggle than the WC would have gotten suspicous. Some of the top wizards in the world are in it and they would have gotten suspicous if things weren't completely decimated. Also, the WC would have suspected something was up if there weren't any bodies. Why were there no death curses is what they would have been thinking. Also, how could he have arranged for wizard captives?

I'm not seeing how anything else in your post clashes with Simon being Cowl  ???. In fact, don't they strengthen it?
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: wizard nelson on January 03, 2013, 05:27:24 AM
pyrofeugo wasn't a death curse. just an explosion of dark magic fueled by harry's rage.
the WC is already suspicious and as commander at archangel simon could have arranged a much more covert attack/takeover.
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: Arjan on January 03, 2013, 05:29:30 AM
The WoJ doesn't actually say it was his death curse. It could easily have been a member of the Brute Squad who realized that Simon was Cowl. Not only that but we may also have a precedent in surviving death curses in Harry's pyrofeugo in GP.

I do not think that was a dead curse. Just overuse of magic.
Quote
Cowl may have had Kumori ressurect him after using his death curse (to make it look more realistic to wizard examiners).
I have read that woj and while such an interpretation is technical possible it sounds like a desperate one designed by people who do not want to loose their pet theory. It is forced and I do not buy it.

It is also my pet theory that a dead curse uses energy needed for a shade to continue its existence without a body and attempt resurrection and that is the reason we see no necromancers using dead curses.
Quote
Simon is an SC level wizard so he is probably a high ranking member of the Circle and/or a person infected by Nemesis that Nemesis places a high priority on. How much damage could Simon have really done? He was a well known figure in the wizarding community and close friends with Eb and Martha Liberty (and information expert). Not only that but he was far far away from the WC headquarters.

Peabody did far more damage than Simon could ever have done.

Not only that but "dying" did tons of bad stuff to the WC and left him free to pursue the Darkhallow. It makes sense that Nemesis/the Circle would send such a powerfull operative to become a literal GOD. They of course wanted to ensure the best possible chance that they could get the prize.

If he had delvered the fortress without much struggle than the WC would have gotten suspicous. Some of the top wizards in the world are in it and they would have gotten suspicous if things weren't completely decimated. Also, the WC would have suspected something was up if there weren't any bodies. Why were there no death curses is what they would have been thinking.
Their suspicions would not have made any difference. He could have tried the darkhallow as Simon and it would not made that much of a difference because Simon as Cowl would not have a white council identity left to protect. The only real explanation for the disguise is a still functioning white council member.
Quote
Also, how could he have arranged for wizard captives?
Sending them on stupid missions to be ambushed. Arranging performance talks and immobilise them one by one and feed them to smuggled in vampires. Loads of other methods a figure with near absolute power and trust could use.

For the red court life captive wizards are extremely valuable.

The one who led the vampires in did not have that. Just the keys.
Quote
I'm not seeing how anything else in your post clashes with Simon being Cowl  ???. In fact, don't they strengthen it?
I thought you were also talking about cowl being human or not. That one was mentioned as well.
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: phoenixjustice on January 03, 2013, 08:04:01 AM
Recall that Harry needed Micheals help. Cowl would probably have needed Kumori's help.

And Simon had a female apprentice... ;D
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: TheCuriousFan on January 03, 2013, 08:08:34 AM
And Simon had a female apprentice... ;D

Though in what time period? She's probably not an apprentice anymore if she was back in WW1 for example.
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: phoenixjustice on January 03, 2013, 08:11:19 AM
Though in what time period? She's probably not an apprentice anymore if she was back in WW1 for example.

True. But I don't think we have word that Simon cut ties with her or vice-versa do we?
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: The Reaver on January 03, 2013, 08:19:10 AM
Not what I expected... I was thinking this was a play on Simon Cowell and we were about to see a ton of American Idol or America's got Talent references.
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: TheCuriousFan on January 03, 2013, 08:23:14 AM
True. But I don't think we have word that Simon cut ties with her or vice-versa do we?

We don't, but would Larisa still be acting like an apprentice decades later?

Not what I expected... I was thinking this was a play on Simon Cowell and we were about to see a ton of American Idol or America's got Talent references.

IIRC Cowl was brought in as a character before those two dhows went on air.
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: wizard nelson on January 03, 2013, 08:30:03 AM
We don't, but would Larisa still be acting like an apprentice decades later?

IIRC Cowl was brought in as a character before those two dhows went on air.
in DB kimori is helping cowl of her own free will. reread the talk her an harry have when she catches him sitting. it makes it seem much more that she believes in what he's doing as the lesser evil, not out of master apprentice obligation. theoretically she doesn't have to still be an apprentice to associate with him.
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: TheCuriousFan on January 03, 2013, 09:37:54 AM
in DB kimori is helping cowl of her own free will. reread the talk her an harry have when she catches him sitting. it makes it seem much more that she believes in what he's doing as the lesser evil, not out of master apprentice obligation. theoretically she doesn't have to still be an apprentice to associate with him.

The scene outside the bookstore still reads like Kumori is working for him rather than with him IMO, she still supports him out of beliefs rather than obligation admittedly though. Of course, she could be Larisa just following the lead of her mentor, we'll find out eventually.
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: 123456789blaaa on January 03, 2013, 08:39:39 PM

I do not think that was a dead curse. Just overuse of magic.

I have read that woj and while such an interpretation is technical possible it sounds like a desperate one designed by people who do not want to loose their pet theory. It is forced and I do not buy it.

It is also my pet theory that a dead curse uses energy needed for a shade to continue its existence without a body and attempt resurrection and that is the reason we see no necromancers using dead curses.

I think we should agree to disagree on these points.

Their suspicions would not have made any difference. He could have tried the darkhallow as Simon and it would not made that much of a difference because Simon as Cowl would not have a white council identity left to protect. The only real explanation for the disguise is a still functioning white council member.

Simon is an SC member and leader of the Brute Squad. He has many many responsiblies and is constrained by his power (this is a running theme in the Dresdenverse). He wouldn't have been able to sneak out of Archangel. He would simply not be able to stay in Chicago long enough to preform the Darkhallow.

I can't think of any possible excuse or false mission he could create which would allow him to go to Chicago for the time it took to preform the darkhallow. Especially since he is the vampire expert during the vampire war. 

Simon would definately have a WC identity to protect. As I said before, the attack on Archangel did a ton of bad things to the WC. Some examples:

As for why Simon would fake his death:
Just look what happens
-It creates a schism in the Senior Council and Council at large.
-It creates a void in the senior council that could alter the balance of power within the council.
-It creates fear throughout the council.
-It gives the Reds, who are likely as not just cats-paws a huge sense confidence in their ability to strike at the council.
-It removed some of the Council's most potent strike forces (likely only behind Eb, and the Senior Council as a whole) in the "brute squad" from the field entirely, potentially dramatically altering the balance of power in the war and in the supernatural world as a whole.


If Simon revealed he was a traitor that lessens the impact of 3 of those. Not only that but if Simon (and SC MEMBER) was revealed as a traitor than rampant paranoia would have been created throughout the WC. The risk of Peabody being found out would have being increased tremendously and he was one of the best people to be a traitor. having him be removed and the younger wardens potentially de-mind boinked would have been a very bad blow to the Circles goals. Not to mention that Simon was close friends with both Eb and Martha Liberty. There's no telling what Eb at least would do after he found out that such a close friend was a traitor.

Sending them on stupid missions to be ambushed. Arranging performance talks and immobilise them one by one and feed them to smuggled in vampires. Loads of other methods a figure with near absolute power and trust could use.

For the red court life captive wizards are extremely valuable.

The one who led the vampires in did not have that. Just the keys.

Sending them on stupid mission sounds like a very bad idea. Simon is obviously a brilliant military leader or he would not have been chosen to lead the Brute Squad. Sustaining heavy losses would be very very suspicious and would also likely get him removed from his position.

Also, how would he stop them from using death curses to kill themselves?

I thought you were also talking about cowl being human or not. That one was mentioned as well.

Ah. Okay.
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: Arjan on January 03, 2013, 10:06:05 PM
I think we should agree to disagree on these points.

Simon is an SC member and leader of the Brute Squad. He has many many responsiblies and is constrained by his power (this is a running theme in the Dresdenverse). He wouldn't have been able to sneak out of Archangel. He would simply not be able to stay in Chicago long enough to preform the Darkhallow.
The gatekeeper disappears all the time. Just let people get used to it.
He is the boss.
Quote

I can't think of any possible excuse or false mission he could create which would allow him to go to Chicago for the time it took to preform the darkhallow.
By that time Archangel was already fallen. As known traitor he does not need to hide his face

Quote
Especially since he is the vampire expert during the vampire war. 

Simon would definately have a WC identity to protect.
No he has not if he is dead. No secret identity needed because he now has only the cowl identity. Cowl has no reason to hide his face if he was simon!
Quote
As I said before, the attack on Archangel did a ton of bad things to the WC. Some examples:
 

If Simon revealed he was a traitor that lessens the impact of 3 of those.
The shock of him being a traitor, of everybody could be a traitor, would compensate for that.
Quote
Not only that but if Simon (and SC MEMBER) was revealed as a traitor than rampant paranoia would have been created throughout the WC. The risk of Peabody being found out would have being increased tremendously
Not really. He was not found when paranoia was rampant after the betrayals that lead to the defeats in dead beat.
Quote
and he was one of the best people to be a traitor. having him be removed and the younger wardens potentially de-mind boinked would have been a very bad blow to the Circles goals. Not to mention that Simon was close friends with both Eb and Martha Liberty. There's no telling what Eb at least would do after he found out that such a close friend was a traitor.

Sending them on stupid mission sounds like a very bad idea.
You can arrange that in a few days and everything will be over before they know it. Treason of the supreme commander can be devastating.
Quote
Simon is obviously a brilliant military leader or he would not have been chosen to lead the Brute Squad. Sustaining heavy losses would be very very suspicious and would also likely get him removed from his position.
By that time it would be too late.
Quote
Also, how would he stop them from using death curses to kill themselves?
Sleep potions and thorn manacles. Simply invite them one by one in your room.
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: 123456789blaaa on January 03, 2013, 10:26:24 PM
<snip>

I think we should stop this debate since I don't think we'll convince each other (generally I find that a debate should stop after posts start to get cut up point by point).

Does anyone else want to chime in? I know lots of other people here are in favour of Simon=Cowl.
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: phoenixjustice on January 04, 2013, 02:52:15 AM
We don't, but would Larisa still be acting like an apprentice decades later?

No, probably not but I think she'd be willing to go along with him, especially if it meant keeping an eye on her Mentor who may or may not have something wrong with him (i.e Infected).

In fact it may also be out of Obligation. Here's a thought I wonder if many have put forth: perhaps she was brought back by Simon.

Maybe her death was kind of a catalyst & he lost it at Archangel (Nemesis may or may not be a part of it.) He either releases a DC at Archangel, fakes one or someone else threw it. After that he flees in the ensuing chaos, takes up the name Cowl, reviving Larisa.

After that, he somehow comes across the Fomor, makes a deal with them (maybe they had a hand in heping bring Larisa back) -which would explain the voice Harry heard in DB- & gets word (somehow) that Kemmler's book is in Chicago.

He is curious to see Harry's skills..
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: Aein on January 10, 2013, 04:57:10 AM
Quote
The core argument of the Cowl=Simon theory is very simple and very powerful:

we know that Cowl is a human SC-level wizard, so the list of suspect is very short

This doesn't exactly make sense to me. To me, this argument assumes that we've seen every human SC-level wizard in the Dresdenverse, and that because we've seen them all, Cowl must therefore be one of them. That's a pretty big assumption, with no support to back it up, especially given Harry's notoriety for unreliable narration. A wizard of SC-level skill could easily hide their existence from others if he or she so chose.
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: peregrine on January 10, 2013, 05:36:57 AM
On the one hand, Elaine is doing much the same thing, sandbagging her skill level.  On the other hand, they at least know of her existance.  And Cowl has at least made vague allusions to Council internal politics.
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: madness on January 10, 2013, 05:42:44 AM
This doesn't exactly make sense to me. To me, this argument assumes that we've seen every human SC-level wizard in the Dresdenverse, and that because we've seen them all, Cowl must therefore be one of them. That's a pretty big assumption, with no support to back it up, especially given Harry's notoriety for unreliable narration. A wizard of SC-level skill could easily hide their existence from others if he or she so chose.

Harry has not met most of the Senior Council eligible wizards.  Most of them appear to be hermits or retired or whatever.

That does not mean that the OTHER Senior Council eligible wizards are not familiar with them though.  I find it highly unlikely that people like Langtry, Eb and Rashid are not familiar with all of the 250+ year old wizards on the White Council.  They may not have seen some of them for a century or two but they would likely recognize them if they ran into them - which is the whole point of the disguise.
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: phoenixjustice on January 10, 2013, 05:46:55 AM
And Cowl has at least made vague allusions to Council internal politics.

Exactly. His line struck me, since the council values secrecy so much, how would he know that they're 'rotting.

Quote
"The Council is not what it was," said Cowl. "It has rotted from the inside, and many wizards who have chafed at its restrictions have seen the war with the Red Court reveal its weakness. It will fall. Soon. Perhaps before tomorrow night."
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: peregrine on January 10, 2013, 05:58:44 AM
Also, even if Cowl is Simon, and everyone would no longer give him help, knowing that Cowl is Simon would still enable them to better defend against him.  People know him, people know what he can do, to some extent.  As Cowl, he's a cipher, and harder to predict and defend against.  Also, if he was planting metaphorical landmines in the Council, outting himself as Simon would make the Council more wary of things he did.

I personally do not think Cowl is Simon, but if he were, there's still PLENTY of reasons to hide that fact.
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: peregrine on January 10, 2013, 06:37:13 AM
Then again, what was the timeline for Archangel>Dead Beat?  Because Cowl was talking fairly current events, and if he had been "dead" for several years by then, he wouldn't have known what's going on in the Council.

Then again, Peabody was still active, and could have been feeding him info.
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: TheCuriousFan on January 10, 2013, 06:40:09 AM
Archangel fell about two days before the White Council meeting in Summer Knight IIRC. It had been three years since then in Dead Beat.
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: KurtinStGeorge on January 10, 2013, 06:56:48 AM
I'm not going to go any further into the details of the, is he/isn't he debate.  It makes some sense that Cowl is a wizard with SC ability but there is nothing to really nail it down, at least not for me.

Do most of you who think Cowl=Simon also think Elaine=Kumori?  I can buy the later more than the former.  My question to those who believe both equations are true.  Has anyone put together a WAG why Elaine would hook up with the man whose apprentice enthralled her when she was a teenager?  Granted we don't have much information about Elaine after she ran away from Justin's burning house and we really know even less about Simon, but I'm hoping someone has tried to think how it might have worked. 

That raises an interesting point.  Has Jim said anything about when we might see Elaine again?  It's hard to get any more clues with her out of the picture for so long.  She was in the fourth and the ninth book. (Maybe in the seventh book too.)  I think she is overdue for an appearance.     
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: wizard nelson on January 10, 2013, 07:32:30 AM
Harry has not met most of the Senior Council eligible wizards.  Most of them appear to be hermits or retired or whatever.

That does not mean that the OTHER Senior Council eligible wizards are not familiar with them though.  I find it highly unlikely that people like Langtry, Eb and Rashid are not familiar with all of the 250+ year old wizards on the White Council.  They may not have seen some of them for a century or two but they would likely recognize them if they ran into them - which is the whole point of the disguise.
a good question for jim, has cowl been seen yet without his uhh... cowl? ::)
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: 123456789blaaa on January 10, 2013, 04:01:11 PM
I'm not going to go any further into the details of the, is he/isn't he debate.  It makes some sense that Cowl is a wizard with SC ability but there is nothing to really nail it down, at least not for me.

Do most of you who think Cowl=Simon also think Elaine=Kumori?  I can buy the later more than the former.  My question to those who believe both equations are true.  Has anyone put together a WAG why Elaine would hook up with the man whose apprentice enthralled her when she was a teenager?  Granted we don't have much information about Elaine after she ran away from Justin's burning house and we really know even less about Simon, but I'm hoping someone has tried to think how it might have worked. 

That raises an interesting point.  Has Jim said anything about when we might see Elaine again?  It's hard to get any more clues with her out of the picture for so long.  She was in the fourth and the ninth book. (Maybe in the seventh book too.)  I think she is overdue for an appearance.     

It's unlikely that Elaine is Kumori since she wouldn't have had to stand on tippy-toes to hold a knife to Harry's throat. There's also how she helped Harry to ruin the Circles plan's twice.
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: the neurovore of Zur-En-Aargh on January 10, 2013, 06:46:22 PM
Exactly. His line struck me, since the council values secrecy so much, how would he know that they're 'rotting.

Pure propaganda. He doesn't have to know anything at all about them to say they're rotting, or evil, or big meanies, or that they eat babies.  He's opposed to them so he has a motive to badmouth them.  And it's not as if they were rotting, even.
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: the neurovore of Zur-En-Aargh on January 10, 2013, 06:48:38 PM
Do most of you who think Cowl=Simon also think Elaine=Kumori?

Not since the recent mention that Simon had a female apprentice.

Quote
  Has anyone put together a WAG why Elaine would hook up with the man whose apprentice enthralled her when she was a teenager?

Because she was never enthralled, but a free-willed associate of Justin and went to Simon for support and protection when Justin died ?
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: Second Aristh on January 10, 2013, 07:46:29 PM
Do most of you who think Cowl=Simon also think Elaine=Kumori?   
I'm of the mind that Cowl=Simon, but Kumori isn't really anyone else (possibly the apprentice that Simon has been mentioned having; she's more unknown than Kumori as far as we're concerned).  I don't think that Kumori=Elaine.
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: KurtinStGeorge on January 10, 2013, 08:13:50 PM
Not since the recent mention that Simon had a female apprentice.

Because she was never enthralled, but a free-willed associate of Justin and went to Simon for support and protection when Justin died ?

Not bad, particularly the second point.
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: madness on January 10, 2013, 08:34:25 PM
I have always thought it possible that Simon was possibly behind the involvement of Justin and Maggie in all of these plots in the first place.

It isn't my favorite theory but I think that the theory could be made to fit.

Simon could have swooped in and rescued Elaine in the aftermath of Justin's death.  Whether she was enthralled or not.  If Justin was training the children at the command or suggestion of Simon from the beginning then Simon would know how to track her down.
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: the neurovore of Zur-En-Aargh on January 10, 2013, 09:04:47 PM
I have always thought it possible that Simon was possibly behind the involvement of Justin and Maggie in all of these plots in the first place.

I am fond of that notion, because I get the strong impression that knowledge about Outsiders is very rare in the DV (there's a Law against looking for it, and we see in Bob's report of the Council going all Fahrenheit 451 on Kemmler's writings in DB what the Council's policy is like with regard to information specifically about Lawbreaking), and if Simon == Cowl, we then have direct connections between everyone we've seen display knowledge of Outsiders in the series prior to CD (Justin as Simon's apprentice, and Justin and Maggie and Lord Raith linked by Eb in BR) which would be neat and orderly and Occamian.
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: madness on January 11, 2013, 09:47:17 AM
I am fond of that notion, because I get the strong impression that knowledge about Outsiders is very rare in the DV (there's a Law against looking for it, and we see in Bob's report of the Council going all Fahrenheit 451 on Kemmler's writings in DB what the Council's policy is like with regard to information specifically about Lawbreaking), and if Simon == Cowl, we then have direct connections between everyone we've seen display knowledge of Outsiders in the series prior to CD (Justin as Simon's apprentice, and Justin and Maggie and Lord Raith linked by Eb in BR) which would be neat and orderly and Occamian.

It also provides an easy explanation for how Maggie could have gotten involved - the heroic and powerful friend of her father that she might have sought out once she ran away from home.
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: Arjan on January 11, 2013, 11:00:13 AM
I am fond of that notion, because I get the strong impression that knowledge about Outsiders is very rare in the DV (there's a Law against looking for it, and we see in Bob's report of the Council going all Fahrenheit 451 on Kemmler's writings in DB what the Council's policy is like with regard to information specifically about Lawbreaking), and if Simon == Cowl, we then have direct connections between everyone we've seen display knowledge of Outsiders in the series prior to CD (Justin as Simon's apprentice, and Justin and Maggie and Lord Raith linked by Eb in BR) which would be neat and orderly and Occamian.
But there is one place that most likely has books about outsiders. Lord Raith's library.
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: the neurovore of Zur-En-Aargh on January 11, 2013, 03:43:38 PM
But there is one place that most likely has books about outsiders. Lord Raith's library.

There has to be some source for information about Outsiders getting into the Lord Raith/Maggie/Justin/Cowl-if-he-is-Simon cabal, and maybe Lord Raith has some of that now, but I am not seeing any reason to assume that he's the one who first had it, rather than having learned it from Maggie or one of the others.

Given that Lord Raith appears to be sufficiently low-grade a magical talent to need to work with others to pull off a ritual, though, I suspect that anything he has will at best be specific magical recipes (like Victor Sell's set of spells) rather than that he can be a researcher and designer of sophisticated Outsider-based magic; Maggie seems a much more likely candidate for that to me.
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: Arjan on January 11, 2013, 05:36:37 PM
There has to be some source for information about Outsiders getting into the Lord Raith/Maggie/Justin/Cowl-if-he-is-Simon cabal, and maybe Lord Raith has some of that now, but I am not seeing any reason to assume that he's the one who first had it, rather than having learned it from Maggie or one of the others.

Given that Lord Raith appears to be sufficiently low-grade a magical talent to need to work with others to pull off a ritual, though, I suspect that anything he has will at best be specific magical recipes (like Victor Sell's set of spells) rather than that he can be a researcher and designer of sophisticated Outsider-based magic; Maggie seems a much more likely candidate for that to me.
There was talk about a library, not just a few books.

I do not think Lord Raith had these books for himself. He has a history of enthralling sorceresses and they were for their use as well. As additional lure and as a source of indirect (via the enthralled witch) power.

He might even have inherited from former heads of house Raith.  There is probably a lot in there he can not use because he collects them. And he will especially collect books that are against white council law and teachings. Just to make it more interesting and because he can.

Those are my suspicions anyway.
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: the neurovore of Zur-En-Aargh on January 11, 2013, 07:16:55 PM
I do not think Lord Raith had these books for himself. He has a history of enthralling sorceresses and they were for their use as well.

Sorry, where do you get that about the history from ? The sorceresses in BR don't seem enthralled; I doubt they'd have aimed a curse at Inari if they had been.
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: Arjan on January 11, 2013, 07:24:33 PM
Sorry, where do you get that about the history from ? The sorceresses in BR don't seem enthralled; I doubt they'd have aimed a curse at Inari if they had been.
I presume the normal whampire lust whammie but we do not know for sure. Margaret might have been but after her death curse Lord Raith had to preserve energy.

But enthrallment or not the important thing is that he attracts female practitioners to do the magic he can not do himself and a big library is an asset for that.
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: 123456789blaaa on January 13, 2013, 11:15:11 PM
This doesn't exactly make sense to me. To me, this argument assumes that we've seen every human SC-level wizard in the Dresdenverse, and that because we've seen them all, Cowl must therefore be one of them. That's a pretty big assumption, with no support to back it up, especially given Harry's notoriety for unreliable narration. A wizard of SC-level skill could easily hide their existence from others if he or she so chose.

I think this bears repeating. I love Simon=Cowl but the OP makes a somewhat baffling assumption. Elegast, could you present your rational? 
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: madness on January 14, 2013, 02:20:36 AM
I think this bears repeating. I love Simon=Cowl but the OP makes a somewhat baffling assumption. Elegast, could you present your rational?

I don't see how it would be easy for a White Council trained wizard to live 250-300 years while amassing such skill and power without his peers (similarly old and powerful wizards) knowing about him.

It is sort of like having some super duper movie assassin pop-up that no one knows about.  The odds are really, really good that they had serious military training at some point. 

They can probably physically hide but they can't hide their identity (if they walk around with no disguise) because the community is just too small and the skillset is just too unique.  Someone in the community will recognize them.

Harry and Elaine are really the only examples of White Council educated wizards that we who were not known to the White Council during their apprenticeships.  Even Kemmler's disciples were known to the White Council (and if I had to guess I would say that they were actual members who defected or were corrupted).
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: madness on January 14, 2013, 02:25:49 AM
If Cowl isn't Simon then it seems likely that he is either some long retired wizard that has disappeared or that he was some young wizard that the Fomor abducted/recruited and who has been presumed dead for a very long time.
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: phoenixjustice on January 14, 2013, 06:57:04 AM
I don't see how it would be easy for a White Council trained wizard to live 250-300 years while amassing such skill and power without his peers (similarly old and powerful wizards) knowing about him.

Oh no, it's definitely possible; Aizen in Bleach held back how powerful he truly was for hundreds of years without being detected. I would think it most definitely be possible, especially if they are noted to be powerful, like Simon. Aizen was so powerful, he was able to trick some of the most powerful characters with illusions that they couldn't even detect them until he pointed them out. I think Simon just chose to leave when it was time/the opportunity presented itself and/or something came up, like a plan beginning/starting to come to fruition.
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: psuliin on January 14, 2013, 07:18:14 AM
One more piece of evidence that Cowl = SP: Cowl seems to be closely and recently acquainted with the wardens and how they feel about Dresden. That implies someone either on the Senior Council, very close to the SC, a leader of the wardens, or some combination of the three. Simon Petrovich fits all of those parameters.

There are two points that I think may make this theory less certain, however.

First, while the wizards listed in the OP are the only SC-level wizards named in the novels so far, LTW clearly indicated that there were several others who might have been tapped to the Senior Council. Whether any of those have the contacts with the Wardens necessary to say some of the things Cowl has said is unknown.

Second, I think several things suggest that Simon Petrovich's body was found at Archangel. WoJ talked about the vampires found "around Simon," seemingly destroyed by his death curse. And also if his body had NOT been found then I think that would have been noteworthy. I certainly wouldn't presume that a member of the Senior Council was dead until I saw the body (and maybe not even then), and I don't think other members of the SC would do so either. Even more important though, if Simon's body had NOT been found then one obvious possibility would be that the Reds had taken him alive. And that would be a top-priority emergency for the Senior Council, due to the possibility of Simon being turned and converted into a member of the Red Court. That would be a disaster. The fact that this never came up leads me to think that Simon's body was found at Archangel.

Now, another poster suggested that Simon/Cowl could have died and then used Corpsetaker-style body-jumping to escape. But if he did that then how did his new body sustain the serious injuries that we believe he suffered?

On balance, I think the weight of evidence is slightly in favor of the theory, but some questions do remain.
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: Elegast on January 14, 2013, 01:42:44 PM
I think this bears repeating. I love Simon=Cowl but the OP makes a somewhat baffling assumption. Elegast, could you present your rational?

Sure.

I'm not saying that Simon must be Cowl. I'm just saying that if Cowl is a known character, then it must be Simon.

And it's far from certain that any other SC-council level wizard exists: in Dead Beat Harry says:
Quote from: Dead Beat
An offensive action like a full assault from the Senior Council, the seven oldest and strongest wizards on the planet, had been long overdue.
Luccio says:
Quote
"And frankly, we must protect the lives of the Senior Council. So long as they are concealed from the enemy and still able to take action, they are a dangerous force. Together they wield more power than any hundred members of the Council, and it can be concentrated with deadly effect,

Which seems to imply that the SC is the Top 7 among wizards.
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: TheCuriousFan on January 14, 2013, 01:48:19 PM
Quote
And it's far from certain that any other SC-council level wizard exists: in Dead Beat Harry says:

What about all the other senior council candidates in Summer Knight?
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: Ms Duck on January 14, 2013, 01:48:42 PM
Sure.

I'm not saying that Simon must be Cowl. I'm just saying that if Cowl is a known character, then it must be Simon.

And it's far from certain that any other SC-council level wizard exists: in Dead Beat Harry says:Luccio says:
Which seems to imply that the SC is the Top 7 among wizards.

in SK they listed a half dozen possibilities.. including lucciozi, who made Eb twitch, who went missing in south america right before the war started, who may be related to luccio..

he got just as much "screen time" as Simon, and is of SC level. so why not him?
 ;D
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: TheCuriousFan on January 14, 2013, 02:09:29 PM
in SK they listed a half dozen possibilities.. including lucciozi, who made Eb twitch, who went missing in south america right before the war started, who may be related to luccio..

he got just as much "screen time" as Simon, and is of SC level. so why not him?
 ;D

Actually, all we know about Luciozzi is that he/she went on a sabbatical, wizard Montjoy is the one who went on the research trip into the Yucatan.
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: 123456789blaaa on January 14, 2013, 03:39:27 PM
I don't see how it would be easy for a White Council trained wizard to live 250-300 years while amassing such skill and power without his peers (similarly old and powerful wizards) knowing about him.

It is sort of like having some super duper movie assassin pop-up that no one knows about.  The odds are really, really good that they had serious military training at some point. 

They can probably physically hide but they can't hide their identity (if they walk around with no disguise) because the community is just too small and the skillset is just too unique.  Someone in the community will recognize them.

Harry and Elaine are really the only examples of White Council educated wizards that we who were not known to the White Council during their apprenticeships.  Even Kemmler's disciples were known to the White Council (and if I had to guess I would say that they were actual members who defected or were corrupted).

Molly was being trained by Lea. I don't see why a wizard has to be in the White Council.

Sure.

I'm not saying that Simon must be Cowl. I'm just saying that if Cowl is a known character, then it must be Simon.

And it's far from certain that any other SC-council level wizard exists: in Dead Beat Harry says:Luccio says:
Which seems to imply that the SC is the Top 7 among wizards.


Ah I see. I suggest making that a bit more clear in the OP.

Both Harry and Luccio are people with limited knowledge. I can see them easily being mistaken.
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: madness on January 14, 2013, 08:12:30 PM
Molly was being trained by Lea. I don't see why a wizard has to be in the White Council.

Ah I see. I suggest making that a bit more clear in the OP.

Both Harry and Luccio are people with limited knowledge. I can see them easily being mistaken.

Molly is very well known to the White Council.

That examples seems to prove my point more than your point.

Molly has also only been operating for a year or a year and a half under the tutelage of Lea and she is already infamous among many different powers in the supernatural community.  Cowl (if not Simon) has likely been operating for decades or centuries.
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: 123456789blaaa on January 14, 2013, 08:39:15 PM
Molly is very well known to the White Council.

That examples seems to prove my point more than your point.

Molly has also only been operating for a year or a year and a half under the tutelage of Lea and she is already infamous among many different powers in the supernatural community.  Cowl (if not Simon) has likely been operating for decades or centuries.

Molly is deliberately making herself known to everyone. That's why she became the Rag Lady in the first place: To scare off supernatural baddies. I don't see why a wizard couldn't be picked up by a supernatural creature and taught while keeping themselves unknown to the WC.

Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: madness on January 14, 2013, 08:47:58 PM
Molly is deliberately making herself known to everyone. That's why she became the Rag Lady in the first place: To scare off supernatural baddies. I don't see why a wizard couldn't be picked up by a supernatural creature and taught while keeping themselves unknown to the WC.

It is definitely possible.

It would just take a century or two for that wizard to get to Cowl's level.

We also have no in-universe examples of this being done.  Only examples of supernatural powers kidnapping or luring magic users that don't make the radar of the White Council.
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: psuliin on January 14, 2013, 09:07:01 PM
Harry and Elaine were unknown to the White Council while they were being trained by Justin DuMorne (who was not only a member of the WC himself, but a warden). Harry didn't become known to the Council until he killed DuMorne.

We know this because Elaine disappeared after DuMorne's death and showed up later in California. The White Council tested her, but she deliberately threw the test and was not inducted. However there's no indication that they asked who had trained her (even though she clearly had been trained), or that they even cared. Elaine might not have come to their attention at all if she hadn't tried to operate openly.

So it seems clear that people of WC-level power can and do operate outside the White Council, and even do so without their knowledge.
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: the neurovore of Zur-En-Aargh on January 14, 2013, 09:26:59 PM
We know this because Elaine disappeared after DuMorne's death and showed up later in California. The White Council tested her, but she deliberately threw the test and was not inducted. However there's no indication that they asked who had trained her (even though she clearly had been trained), or that they even cared. Elaine might not have come to their attention at all if she hadn't tried to operate openly.
So it seems clear that people of WC-level power can and do operate outside the White Council, and even do so without their knowledge.

If they are skilled enough to fake being low-level practitioners, perhaps.

I don't think we can judge likely response to Elaine operating openly on a visibly Warden-strength level of power from reaction to Elaine giving the impression of not being strong enough to be worth bothering about.
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: Ms Duck on January 14, 2013, 10:14:32 PM
It is definitely possible.

It would just take a century or two for that wizard to get to Cowl's level.

We also have no in-universe examples of this being done.  Only examples of supernatural powers kidnapping or luring magic users that don't make the radar of the White Council.

Maggie Sr was SC level before she was a century old, imo :)

Harry is closing in. While he likely doesnt have his mother's sheer genius he does have a certain tenacity..
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: psuliin on January 14, 2013, 11:08:44 PM
If they are skilled enough to fake being low-level practitioners, perhaps.

Of course. My point was that even a Warden (Justin) was able to take two apprentices and keep them secret from the White Council until they were skilled enough to fake the Council's tests (Harry never got the chance to, of course). If Justin could do it then presumably others could. So it seems likely that there are several powerful practitioners out there who are either completely unknown to the Council or who are more powerful than the Council realizes they are.
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: Arjan on January 15, 2013, 01:20:44 AM
Morty has council level strength though very specialised. Nobody knows.Harry discovered it only in ghost story.

But Summer Knight showed clearly that wizards on the seniority list with senior council level strength could get out of sight for years with an excuse like real married, pyramid sitting or a research trip. Cowl is probably one of those.

Nobody tells a wizard on that level what he is supposed to do with his time if he has no official job to do and even then. If he wants to live as a hermit in the outer Hebrides he is completely free to do so. And nobody stops him if he drops out of sight.

Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: phoenixjustice on January 15, 2013, 04:10:16 AM
Morty has council level strength though very specialised. Nobody knows. Harry discovered it only in ghost story.

Exactly. It's been proven more than once that the Council isn't as all-seeing as people keep trying to say they are. I think the White Council is quite unaware of many things, especially during the times when they've been in the midst of all out war.

As in the case of Simon and Archangel, the fact that people seemed to think that the Council would automatically know what all happened to Simon and co. there surprises me. I put forth this idea:

Yeah but you have to remember that they had just got hit HARD by the rampires and were dealing with a potential traitor in the Council as well. My guess is they saw what Simon's 'Death Curse' did and saw there was no body left and put two and two together. IIRC we have no WoJ of ANYONE finding Simon's body.

Jim's answer only strengthened my faith in Simon being Cowl, because he essentially said that someone could fake a Death Curse. Sure there might be a 'trail' of sorts, but again, if something looks like a Death Curse, there isn't really a need for them to look into it, especially considering the fact that they had a lot more on their plates that had higher priority than to question whether a highly trusted wizard's Death Curse was legit or not.

Exactly. TC makes that point well. And as I said before, if it looks like a Death Curse, especially from someone who was a trusted Council member, why look into it? They had more than enough proof to believe it was a Death Curse, as evidenced by the wreckage of Archangel they found. Plus? Huge war going on lol.

Neuro also chimed in on the subject:

We see in TC that it takes the Council's very best forensics people to figure out even the rudiments of a magical crime scene that's in the heart of their own territory where they are totally familiar with the environment;  it surpasses my belief that they could do even that well in the middle of a war zone, or would risk their best people in a war zone to get that information.

Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: peregrine on January 15, 2013, 04:23:23 AM
Yeah, but as for that, it's the difference between "Was this a death curse" and "What did his death curse do?"  They were able to determine that a death curse was not cast when LaFortier get whacked.  So it's not impossible.  They were trying something far far more delicate in Edinburgh than what would be required to determine if a Death Curse was cast.  Then again, that assumes they even think to ask, and don't just take it as read that it happened.
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: Ben de Wal on January 15, 2013, 04:28:25 AM
Yeah, but as for that, it's the difference between "Was this a death curse" and "What did his death curse do?"  They were able to determine that a death curse was not cast when LaFortier get whacked.  So it's not impossible.  They were trying something far far more delicate in Edinburgh than what would be required to determine if a Death Curse was cast.  Then again, that assumes they even think to ask, and don't just take it as read that it happened.
ya but they could only do it by how,any wards there were andthey knew how they were arranged
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: peregrine on January 15, 2013, 05:29:10 AM
I don't think the wards were needed to determine that there was no death curse, but they were trying to pick up magical details beyond that.  Afterall, they already knew there was no curse thrown, but they were still trying to find out what happened.
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: Ben de Wal on January 15, 2013, 05:34:08 AM
sorry   i think your corect i  miss understod what you were going for
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: psuliin on January 15, 2013, 08:52:27 AM
Like I said, if in fact Simon's body was never found then that should have set of all kinds of alarms in the White Council. Them simply assuming that he was dead and that the body had been destroyed or removed is the least likely of all possibilities.

First, it's just never wise to assume that a member of the Senior Council is dead until you see the body. Harry himself has cheated death, and he doesn't have nearly the power, subtlety, or experience of someone like Simon Petrovich.

But even more important, the WC could not afford to make that assumption. If they were wrong, then the logical assumption was that Simon had been taken alive by the Red Court and that a member of the Senior Council was in danger of being turned into a vampire. If that happened then the Reds would gain an enormously powerful new member and a fatal load of the WC's most secret information. The had to either make sure that Simon was dead or find him (and either rescue him or kill him).

I grant that the case for Simon = Cowl is a strong one, but if it turns out to be true then the story needs to explain how Simon convinced the WC he was dead, and "the body was missing" is not going to do that.
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: Mortax on January 15, 2013, 12:07:03 PM
Peabody lost the paperwork? :)
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: wizard nelson on January 15, 2013, 12:09:14 PM
Peabody lost the paperwork? :)
i totally hate the simon cowl thing, but that's a damn good point....
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: Mortax on January 15, 2013, 12:16:33 PM
:) Thanks.  It was my silly way of pointing out we STILL don't know how much and what Peabody did in the YEARS he was running around.  Or any other agents.

It's likely the SC doesn't either, which has got to make them excrete paving stones.
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: Ms Duck on January 15, 2013, 12:22:17 PM
:) Thanks.  It was my silly way of pointing out we STILL don't know how much and what Peabody did in the YEARS he was running around.  Or any other agents.

It's likely the SC doesn't either, which has got to make them excrete paving stones.

consideirng how much i like some of them, this would be entertaining to watch...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vq1FNIGap-0 (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vq1FNIGap-0)
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: Arjan on January 15, 2013, 12:56:06 PM
:) Thanks.  It was my silly way of pointing out we STILL don't know how much and what Peabody did in the YEARS he was running around.  Or any other agents.

It's likely the SC doesn't either, which has got to make them excrete paving stones.
I always assumed Peabody simply invaded some minds and the wizard(s) influenced that way just led the vampires in. It is the most simple explanation.
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: the neurovore of Zur-En-Aargh on January 15, 2013, 02:29:59 PM
I grant that the case for Simon = Cowl is a strong one, but if it turns out to be true then the story needs to explain how Simon convinced the WC he was dead, and "the body was missing" is not going to do that.

My bet here is that Simon's "death curse" looked like a major explosion followed by collapse of his fortress, and there was no checking for his body without moving hundreds of tons of rubble.
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: Mortax on January 15, 2013, 03:14:31 PM
...assuming he leveled his DC, yep, sounds about right. :)

BOOM. lol
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: the neurovore of Zur-En-Aargh on January 15, 2013, 05:23:53 PM
...assuming he leveled his DC, yep, sounds about right. :)

I could also entirely believe Simon rigging his fortress to blow, with the intent of then disappearing, and the Council taking it for granted it was a death curse.  If you look at the scenes in laFortier's room in TC, the Council's very best people are stretched to their limits to get really rather little information out of a crime scene in an environment over which they have complete control; even if they are going to risk sending their best investigators into a war zone, I don't believe they'd be able to get anywhere near so much information out of the remains of Archangel.
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: peregrine on January 15, 2013, 05:34:25 PM
But the very particular informationt they're trying to get is incredibly hard to find in any situation at all.  It's the difference between figuring out where someone was shot from, what the height of the shooter was, what the powder load was, and maybe trying to pull a fingerprint from the mangled bullet, and if someone got shot at all.
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: psuliin on January 15, 2013, 05:59:39 PM
My bet here is that Simon's "death curse" looked like a major explosion followed by collapse of his fortress, and there was no checking for his body without moving hundreds of tons of rubble.

I think the White Council would do that if they had to. If Simon were taken alive by the Red Court and turned then the damage to the Council would be incalculable. They simply had to verify that he was dead, or find him if he was not.

But there's reason to believe that this didn't happen. In Summer Knight we find a description of the aftermath of Archangel.

"The Wardens said that they couldn't be sure, but it looked like someone let the killers in past the defenses. They didn't get away unscathed. There were the remains of half a dozen nobles of the Red Court. Many of their warriors. But they killed Simon and the rest."

The only way they could get a description like this would be if they could go in and see for themselves. WoJ confirms this, talking about the effects of a death curse: "See what happened to all the vampires around Simon when they assaulted his compound immediately prior to the onstage events in Summer Knight." (emphasis added) It certainly sounds as though the effects of Simon's death curse could be seen by someone. It even suggests that his body was actually there. But if it was not then the White Council would still have to verify his death one way or another before they could sleep at night.
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: phoenixjustice on January 15, 2013, 08:32:39 PM
My bet here is that Simon's "death curse" looked like a major explosion followed by collapse of his fortress, and there was no checking for his body without moving hundreds of tons of rubble.

I could also entirely believe Simon rigging his fortress to blow, with the intent of then disappearing, and the Council taking it for granted it was a death curse.  If you look at the scenes in laFortier's room in TC, the Council's very best people are stretched to their limits to get really rather little information out of a crime scene in an environment over which they have complete control; even if they are going to risk sending their best investigators into a war zone, I don't believe they'd be able to get anywhere near so much information out of the remains of Archangel.

EXACTLY! I couldn't have elaborated better myself! Those are big things for me, in the Simon is Cowl argument. I don't think it possible that the Council would or could afford to spend time or wizards they need on the front lines and/or elsewhere in the War, looking at something which obviously seemed to be Simon using his Death Curse at Archangel and making sure that Simon and others were dead. From the ruins/rubble and everything, everything seemed to give indication of so, so why spend the time/effort that they DID NOT HAVE in confirming it?

They were already frantic, after all. Dealing with a huge war and an obvious traitor in their midst, though they didn't know where to look for the traitor.
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: SunlessNick on January 16, 2013, 03:49:09 PM
How many times has Petrovich actually been mentioned in the books?  (Mentions of Archangel can count).
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: Mortax on January 17, 2013, 12:30:50 AM
From what I remember, about as much as Peabody was mentioned.
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: TheCuriousFan on January 17, 2013, 12:37:41 AM
How many times has Petrovich actually been mentioned in the books?  (Mentions of Archangel can count).

Mentioned at the end of Proven Guilty by Ebenezar when saying why he doesn't trust Rashid. Mentioned in Changes by Ebenezar with the "Remember Archangel!" line. Mentioned by Ebenezar again when he's revealing that he's the Blackstaff and explaining why he took out Ortega.
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: KurtinStGeorge on January 17, 2013, 01:51:48 AM
How many times has Petrovich actually been mentioned in the books?  (Mentions of Archangel can count).

Mentioned in Summer Knight, just before Eb became a SC member.  In fact, Simon's death caused Eb to join the SC. 
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: peregrine on January 17, 2013, 04:01:04 AM
Mentioned at the end of Proven Guilty by Ebenezar when saying why he doesn't trust Rashid. Mentioned in Changes by Ebenezar with the "Remember Archangel!" line. Mentioned by Ebenezar again when he's revealing that he's the Blackstaff and explaining why he took out Ortega.
Mentioned by Kincaid as well, re: Eb's attack on Ortega.
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: wizard nelson on January 17, 2013, 04:07:54 AM
I always assumed Peabody simply invaded some minds and the wizard(s) influenced that way just led the vampires in. It is the most simple explanation.
anyone make the peabody, kemmler connection? peabody wrote a book(don't remember the date early 1900's?) that is instrumental to using the erlking's hunter spirits to complete a darkhallow. he later turns out to be a traitor seeking the councils destruction, coincidence? i think not... peabody writing that book(in german, kemmlers native land?) is reeeal fishy to me.
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: Mortax on January 17, 2013, 05:06:29 AM
Wouldn't it be hilarious if Cowl was Peabody, and Dresden has been so worried about him all this time. lol (No, I don't believe this.)

That said, after some others posting, Simon is mentioned at least as often as Peabody, if not more.  Not counting the book where we get the big reveal about Peabody.  Before that I think he was mentioned several times and spoke maybe once.
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: Cenphx on January 17, 2013, 06:44:44 AM
Doesnt LaFortier also mention Simon when he is accusing Harry of being involved? When he claims Harry would know how to get past Simon's defense because Harry was Justin's apprenticeand Justin was Simon's? All the other dead, but important, characters have made an onscreen appearance except for Simon (Maggie Sr., Harry's dad, Justin). Unless he's Cowl.
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: wizard nelson on January 17, 2013, 06:57:05 AM
ahhh but thats the thing, how important is simon? unless he is cowl not very. thanks for mentioning the justin was his apprentice thing, didn't realise that and hadn't seen it brought up.
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: TheCuriousFan on January 17, 2013, 07:15:04 AM
ahhh but thats the thing, how important is simon? unless he is cowl not very. thanks for mentioning the justin was his apprentice thing, didn't realise that and hadn't seen it brought up.

Not important enough that Jim thought up a complete backstory for him.

http://www.jimbutcheronline.com/bb/index.php/topic,35160.msg1715986.html#msg1715986

On the other hand, Fred did avoid saying Simon was killed....
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: Mortax on January 17, 2013, 01:02:12 PM
Yep, no backstory.  Like Butters.  And the Archive.  Who is now the head of the Oblivion War. :)

Just because he didn't initially plan on Simon/Cowl being as important doesn't mean it didn't evolve into something else.  This is assuming the two are the same.  While I like the theory, I don't think it's conclusive.

Though Klause the Toymaker as Cowl would make me laugh my brain out of my nose.
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: wizard nelson on January 17, 2013, 01:15:42 PM
i had this crazy idea because of how DR was made. what if in order for the outsiders to penetrate reality they have to do it in multiple realities at once?(sorta) they can't outright take the DV because of 5(or 5 billion :o) closely related paralleled worlds/timelines must be busted open at once and cowl is in fact an alternate harry in which justin raised him to be the outsider general he meant him to be. (kimori= elaine or molly) and after blowing the lock in his own dimension he moved on to the next one because the theoretical door doesn't open just because you break one lock/gate. also theoretically when merlin created DR he created alternate parallels because of the time travel involved.
anyone read the merlin conspiracy? DR is starting to remind me of romanov's island in the time travel gimmick.
all crazy, crazy WAG i know...
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: madness on January 17, 2013, 08:39:03 PM
The 'Cowl and Kumori as future Harry and Molly' has been a popular theory in the past though it makes even less sense now.

Cowl as an alternate dimension Harry could probably be made to check off every box needed though now that I think about it.

I don't particularly like the theory but it could be possible I guess.  The height would be an issue.  The experience level could be explained away by alternate Harry being from a more advanced point in time in his own universe (basically an older and more battle scarred version).  Cowl's interest in how Harry stacks up could be explained away as alterna-Harry wanting to see how sissy Harry (didn't get turned to the darkside or have nearly as dark or violent of a history) stacks up.
Title: Re: [CD spoilers] Cowl = Simon reference thread
Post by: SunlessNick on January 17, 2013, 10:04:07 PM
Cowl as an alternate dimension Harry could probably be made to check off every box needed though now that I think about it.

I don't particularly like the theory but it could be possible I guess.
Me too; that's also where I stand on Petrovich as Cowl.  Mostly I think Cowl is just Cowl - his identity won't matter as much as how he got the way he is, and how much of his road Harry will eventually have to walk.