Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - AcornArmy

Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5] 6 7 ... 14
61
DF Reference Collection / Re: Questions for Jim 2012 style 2
« on: July 22, 2012, 01:13:28 PM »
I don't even know where those questions of mine in the OP came from. They must be pretty old, because I didn't even remember some of them. Anyway, these are scavenged from a "Questions to Be Asked at Q&As" thread from about a year ago:

Some of mine(AcornArmy), to start off:

1) Angels are apparently all soul. So:
   1a) Can angels be soulgazed?
   1b) Can the Fallen in the Denarii be soulgazed through the second pair of eyes which sometimes show up on the foreheads of the Denarians? And, if so:
      1b.1) Will the soulgaze be different than the one you would see if you simply soulgazed the Fallen's Denarian host?

2) Would you(Jim) please clarify exactly who the Faerie Queens can personally kill and who they can't? And also whether these limitations extend to having other fae kill mortals? At various times in Summer Knight and in the rest of the series, we've been told or seen evidence that:

-- The Sidhe Knights are the only ones allowed to act in matters not directly related to the Faerie Courts. (SK, Ch. 10)
-- The Queens are not allowed to kill anyone who isn't a member of their own Court. (SK, Ch. 10)

And yet:

-- We've seen fae servants of the Faerie Queens kill and attempt to kill mortals many times.
-- Aurora was able to try to kill Harry just fine, but was unable to harm Murphy. (SK, Ch. 20-21)
-- When Harry is preparing to deal with Mab to become the Winter Knight, he thinks to himself that Mab can't kill a mortal, only make them wish they were dead. The implication seems to include the Winter Knight. (Changes, Ch. 30)

So which mortals can the Faerie Queens kill? Bob tells us one thing, but evidence in the books indicates something else.

For non-Jim people who'd like to try to answer question #2 themselves: I'm well aware that there are different guesses to be made about what the Queens' limitations are. I've made some of them myself over the years. This question is meant to get a definitive answer from Jim on the subject, though, so we don't have to rely on guesses anymore.


From Vairelome:

From one of the recent threads concerning Maggie, there was some discussion about her official last name right now (post GS, staying with the Carpenters).

So: "What is Maggie's official last name right now?" and if clarification is needed, "Under what last name is she registered at the local elementary school (assuming that's where she's placed)?"


From Karley:

1) How and when did Harry and Michael meet? Would you consider writing a short story about their first encounter?
2) How long has Arthur Langtry been the Merlin?
3) How does one become the Merlin?
4) Is the Winter Lady Maeve the same person as or was she some way involved with the old Irish Queen Maeve of Connacht?
5) If Harry ever does put his full effort into universe-hopping, can you make him go to Discworld?
6) What are the names of the other three minor vampire courts?
7) How did Justin DuMorne find out about Harry?
8 ) When did the old Mother Summer retire and why won't Mother Winter retire?
9) How old is the Gatekeeper?
10) How did the White Council annex the New World shamans and what were the reaction of the Natives?


From Eleyctra:

Is it significant that the eyes of Lea changed from gold in the earlier books, to green in Changes? Is Mab controlling Lea more than we think?


From jeno:

1) How old were Eb and Maggie Sr when they first manifested a talent?
2) How can Kusanagi be a Sword of the Cross when it predates the crucifixion?
3) How many sisters does Thomas have?

62
DF Reference Collection / Re: Unsolved Mysteries Version II
« on: July 12, 2012, 03:43:08 AM »
"Why did Lea burn Thomas when she kissed him?"

I originally suggested this theory a long time ago, but I can't see that it's been negated by anything since then, so I'll repeat it: the idea is that Lea's bargain with Susan gave her access, not only to Susan's memories of Harry, but to Susan's feelings toward him. Including, somehow, the true love protection that Susan had from Harry. Lea never actually removed any of Susan's memories, remember; she just covered them up, while simultaneously giving herself access to them.

My guess is that Lea created some sort of link between herself and Susan through those memories of Harry, and that with those feelings came some of the love that Susan felt for him, and that Harry felt for her. Because of this, as long as the connection was in place, Lea had access to Susan's true love protection. She decided to play around with it by kissing Thomas on the cheek and showing off the fact that it burned him.

The whole idea is pretty vague, because we've never been told anything about a spell like that, but it fits with Lea's pleased and amused demeanor at the time, as well as the timeline of the events.

63
DF Reference Collection / Re: Unsolved Mysteries Version II
« on: July 12, 2012, 03:29:30 AM »
so if Kincaid is a Scion, doesn't that make Harry a Scion as well?

"What's the point of shooting if you're just going to miss?" He smiled, made a mime-gun of his thumb and index finger, and aimed at me. His thumb fell forward and he said, "I'm as human as you are, Dresden. I'll see you later." (Blood Rites)

Possible evidence in favor of this idea in the Harry's Possessiveness thread.

64
DF Reference Collection / Re: Unsolved Mysteries Version II
« on: July 12, 2012, 03:27:02 AM »
It would stand to reason that any magical ward (even one with a Hellfire bonus!) would fall under said category and that a Warden could destroy one without harming themselves (unless it was containing something nasty ;)). Otherwise, the swords are completely useless.

There's bound to be a limit to the amount of power an enchanted Warden's sword has available to it. Whatever that limit is, it seems almost certain to be much less than the Hellfire-infused lines of fire that made up those two pentagrams. In which case, if Luccio had stabbed it with her sword, it probably would've gone the way of the Denarian who fell into them at the aquarium; that is, poof into instant metallic vapor. Luccio would've pulled back a much shorter sword.

Or maybe Cowl's superiors didn't take well to the fact that Dresden managed to outmaneouver him.

As a leader of the Black Council, if someone in your group is about to become a brand new god, do you nominate yourself for the role, or do you hand it off to one of your lackeys, and just pray they continue to follow orders after they've joined the Mount Olympus Mile-High Club?

Myself, I doubt very much that Cowl has any superiors in the hierarchy of The Circle/Black Council. He may be one among many top people, though, ranked equally with several others in the group.

He talks about HWWB having left a mark on him, after that junkie in Storm Front sees him on the policestation and mentions HWWB.

We know there's a mark; we don't know that it looks like HWWB. For one thing, Harry himself had no idea what the thing's name was when he met it, so how would Random Junkie Guy immediately know its name just from seeing an image of it? For that matter, how would he immediately be able to attach the term "wizard" to what he was seeing about Harry?

Thinking about it, I'm having doubts that Junkie Guy was getting all of his information from the Three-Eye drug. Unless it gave some additional, prophetic powers beyond just insight into the nature of what was seen. Or unless the guy had been taking so much of the drug that his mind was no longer tethered properly to his own time and body.

It was also implied that whatever mantle Ebenezar had in mind for Harry, claiming Deamonreach as santum kind of nixed the idea pretty thoroughly. I'm very curious to learn the full significance of that.

The quote from the book is:

Quote from: Turn Coat, Ch. 47
Rashid says that warning him about the island would be pointless. He’s a good judge of people, but I’m not so sure he’s right this time. The boy’s got a solid head on his shoulders, generally. And of all the wizards I know, he’s among the three or four I’d be willing to see take up that particular mantle. I trust his judgment.

That sounds to me like something on the island is the mantle Ebenezar is talking about. It's a job involving Demonreach, one that has the Merlin ready to shite kine, but which Eb thinks that Harry might be ready for. Or that's how it seems to me, anyway.

65
DF Reference Collection / Re: Suggest Topics Here!
« on: July 11, 2012, 03:50:45 PM »
Okay, kind of a long list, here goes:

Doylist analysis on LC fix timing
Black Council "Recruitment"
Catalogue of Harry's Nightmares (WIP)
Mouse's Origins
Missed subtleties from my fifth reread of Changes
White Court Magic-Users, Death Curses and Soulfire
Something about Harry
Uriel's long game? FM, DB, Ch, and GS (WIP)
WC vamp wizards
Lea and the Black Athame
Maeve did it.
PG: combining Neurovore and Knnn.
An evilish-Elaine theory in summary
Taking a closer look at Small Favor (LONG)
The case for Titania
Who recruited and trained Victor Sells?
Harry Dresden, Most Wanted
A Theory about Black Magic Corruption
THOUGHT EXERCISE Harry Dresden - a serial killer who targets schoolgirls

Oh, and a couple of mine that I'm fairly happy with:

Maggie LeFay and the Outsiders
Harry's Possessiveness

I couldn't remember very many theory threads that were still around, so I basically just opened the Topics posted list for a few dozen regular posters and looked for good theory threads they'd started. I found several that I'd read already and forgotten about, and several that I hadn't seen before. So this was a productive exercise. :)  I'm sure I've missed some good ones, though, especially any good theories that didn't have their own thread dedicated to them.

Not all of these are theory threads, though. Some of them are just collections of information which seem like they could be useful as reference materials in the future.

66
DF Reference Collection / Re: Suggest Topics Here!
« on: July 11, 2012, 10:49:17 AM »
While it is not the most fleshed-out theory, I think the prospect that Maggie LeFay founded the Black Council is on to a really solid idea.

Thanks :)  I eventually filled it out more, and made the Maggie LeFay and the Outsiders thread.

67
DF Reference Collection / Re: Unsolved Mysteries Version II
« on: July 10, 2012, 11:11:51 PM »
As I understand it, they're not able to kill anyone who's not involved in Faerie business.
It's only a physical restriction for the queens--for the rest of the Faeries, it's at best a guideline.See above: Harry was directly involved in Faerie business as Mab's emissary.

Yeah, but these are just guesses. The fact is, we've gotten information that doesn't fit together very well. There have been a lot of guesses made about how things are supposed to work-- I've made a few myself-- but this question is meant to get an official response from Jim someday, in the hope of clearing up the issue for good.

68
DF Reference Collection / Re: Unsolved Mysteries Version II
« on: July 10, 2012, 08:18:57 PM »
Okay, I've added two questions:

-How was Maggie Sr. connected to the Outsiders?
-How do the Laws of Magic work?

Does anybody have any suggestions on how to make the second question less vague?  It was the best I could come up with, given the amount of discussion in the Laws of Magic thread.

I have posted a possible answer to the first question here!: Maggie LeFay and the Outsiders

'Course, I made that thread almost a year ago, so it'll be going away soon. Maybe I should re-post it or something, since nothing has changed to alter the theory since then.

69
DF Reference Collection / Re: Unsolved Mysteries Version II
« on: July 10, 2012, 08:11:03 PM »
I've noticed something in Dead Beat that wa interesting. When Cowl lifts his arms to touch the Darkhollow, his arms are described as "long, weathered arms covered in old scars." NOW, the only person I can recall having this "weathered" descriptions is Injun Joe. Infact, many times that Injun Joe is introduced in the story this word appears. Theory, Injun Joe being a healer finds an injured Elaine, heals her, then recruits her. Joe is very interested in aspects of life and death that could tie into a benevolent form of Necromancy. Does this theory hold water?

It does not, I'm sorry to say. Listens-to-Wind showed up at Harry's house that very night to help heal the Wardens, and there was no mention at all of him looking the slightest bit battered or bruised. According to all sources in DB, having the Darkhallow explode in your face would be a somewhat damaging experience, and in White Night, Cowl-- if it was actually Cowl-- still moved in such a way that it conveyed that he was in pain, which seemed to confirm the idea that Cowl had been badly injured by the Darkhallow crashing.

Of course, Cowl could've been injured by something else, and he might have been just fine after the Darkhallow ended, allowing him to go heal people at Harry's apartment as Injun Joe. But that doesn't seem like the safest bet.

70
DF Reference Collection / Re: Unsolved Mysteries Version II
« on: July 10, 2012, 08:04:25 PM »
In Grave Peril at the graveyard scene, and at the beginning of Summer Knight when Harry met Mab, it was hammered home that Fae can't really work their magic on you unless they already have a handle on you.
I thought that was that they couldn't kill you unless they already had a handle on you. They are allowed to mess in other ways though.
Or am I wrong?
I thought it was just the Queens not all fae

This is a problem, because we've been given some conflicting information in the books, or at least information that doesn't seem to fit together properly. Still waiting for a WoJ to clarify. In Ask JimTM form, I guess the question would be:

Would you(Jim) please clarify exactly who the Faerie Queens can personally kill and who they can't? At various times in Summer Knight and in the rest of the series, we've been told or seen evidence that:

-- The Sidhe Knights are the only ones allowed to act in matters not directly related to the Faerie Courts. (SK, Ch. 10)
-- The Queens are not allowed to kill anyone who isn't a member of their own Court. (SK, Ch. 10)

And yet:

-- We've seen fae servants of the Faerie Queens kill and attempt to kill mortals many times.
-- Aurora was able to try to kill Harry just fine, but was unable to harm Murphy. (SK, Ch. 20-21)
-- When Harry is preparing to deal with Mab to become the Winter Knight, he thinks to himself that Mab can't kill a mortal, only make them wish they were dead. The implication seems to include the Winter Knight. (Changes, Ch. 30)

So which mortals can the Faerie Queens kill? Bob tells us one thing, but evidence in the books indicates something else.

71
DF Reference Collection / Re: Questions
« on: March 23, 2012, 08:13:32 PM »
Per (Dead Beat):

"She never got it. In that single second of uncertainty, Corpsetaker had been relying upon her disguise to defend her, and had her mind bent upon planning her next step-not preparing her death curse. The bullet from my.44 hit her just over her right cheekbone."

If I remember correctly, it's always Harry doing the recounting of him shooting Corpsetaker. She was standing in front of him with her back to him, so even though she turned her head when he called her name, it may be that Harry still thinks of it in terms of shooting her in the back of the head. A personal-impression thing, rather than a strictly-factual thing. Harry's own sense of it at the time was that he was shooting her from behind, in the head, so he thinks of it as shooting her in the back of the head, regardless of where the bullet actually hit.

72
DF Reference Collection / Re: Questions
« on: March 19, 2012, 11:52:04 PM »
See... that's about the argument I'd been making and I had just about given up. I also think that nuance is important.
Does not change the fact that the whisper didn't push him to accept the WK mantle, only how to deal with it.

These two statements don't contradict one another. And I agree with both of them, myself. I just think that, while the Whisperer's ultimate goal was that Harry should kill himself-- and it used the necessity of him becoming the Winter Knight to get him to that point-- the only thing that the Whisper changed directly was whether or not Harry would talk to Uriel.

At first I was thinking along the lines of, Harry was going to be the Winter Knight regardless of whether or not the Whisperer said anything to him, and probably regardless of whether or not he talked to Uriel. That is, if Harry hadn't been influenced by either one, he still would have become the WK. But then I realized that that third option was never on the table; we got to see how Harry would behave without the Whisperer's seven words, and Harry chose to call Uriel. Which meant that the only paths he was ever likely to have taken were the one in which he talked to Uriel and the one in which he heard the Whisperer. In my opinion, those are the two main points of difference, because those were the two points at which he made his decisions.

Basically, I think Harry was already on the road to killing himself, but, because of his choices, he was going to be saved by Uriel giving him hope. The Whisperer closed off the branch of Harry's future which would have given Harry hope, so Harry went with his prior inclination, which was to assume the worst about himself becoming the Winter Knight, which in turn led to his decision to kill himself.

Though, you know, thinking about it here, I'm having a hard time remembering why this minute distinction between theories matters at all. Most of us seem to be thinking pretty much the same thing, we just seem to have different ideas about which point in the chain of events was most important.

73
DF Reference Collection / Re: Questions
« on: March 19, 2012, 02:58:05 PM »
See, I'm refering to the route, not the result. The whisper altered his route as well as the result.

Yeah, but I think the two are not independent. Altering the route caused the change in result, because a route that didn't include a chat with Uriel led straight and only to suicide after becoming the Winter Knight. Uriel was what gave Harry the hope for a future.

The difference in what Harry does first seems odd, if you focus on the Winter Knight thing vs. the suicide thing(it did to me too, until a few minutes ago), because why wouldn't he have tried to call Uriel both times? But if the primary difference in Harry's decision tree was simply that the Whisper made him feel like such a shit that he didn't deserve to call on Uriel, then the rest of what happened falls naturally from that fact. Without Uriel, suicide; with Uriel, no suicide.

74
DF Reference Collection / Re: Questions
« on: March 19, 2012, 02:39:31 PM »
The Whisperer caused Harry to lose his last shred of hope. I think maybe it's as simple as that. With his memory gone, that shred of hope was still there, so Harry called Uriel to confirm the status of his injury, and hopefully to get a solution to his problems that didn't involve going to Mab. It was thin, but it was his last possible option before he was left with nothing better than Mab.

I think Uriel actually increased Harry's hope, though, by telling him that if he did it for love, there might be a way back from whatever happened to him as the Winter Knight. So Harry called Mab.

After the Whisperer spoke to him, though, Harry no longer believed he even deserved something better, much less that it was possible. So he went to the Winter Knight option without the hope of being able to redeem himself from what Mab was going to do to him. That made killing himself before Mab could get her hands on him seem like the best option.

 -- Actually, now that I think about it, what the Whisperer accomplished was something more tangible than that, something so friggin' obvious that I can't believe it hasn't been thought of already(including by me, until just this moment): the seven words steered Harry away from calling Uriel. I mean... duh, right? With his memory erased, Harry acted as he would have acted without the Whisperer's comment, which was to call Uriel and ask for help. Uriel didn't give him any solid help, but he did give Harry hope. Scratch my original argument-- I think it was correct in way, just not in the way I originally thought. Harry didn't have much hope left, other than Uriel, so he called Uriel, and the archangel gave him hope for his future. Without that, Harry would have moved on to the suicide option.

I think that's it. Put simply, the Whisperer threw Harry off of his natural course of calling Uriel. Which led to him committing suicide, yes, but only as a natural side-effect of being forced to become the Winter Knight, without also having hope for redemption from being the Winter Knight. It wasn't a question of whether or not he would become the WK, though; I think that was always going to happen.

75
DF Reference Collection / Re: Questions
« on: March 17, 2012, 11:52:31 PM »
He had made the decision, even if he didn't remember why he made that decision.  But before he heard the words, it was hopeless, there was nothing he could do.  It was only after he was told it was all his fault was he willing to take that extra step.

But again, we've gone and done this over and over, nobody's getting their minds changed.

Well, then why bring it up? The second time his mind went through most of the same thoughts that he'd had before, which indicates that he had not made a decision yet. Unless you want to say that he'd already made the decision at that point the first time around, too. And the second time, he called Uriel for confirmation of his injuries and begged for help before doing anything else. It was only after talking to Uriel that he decided on what he had to do. The second time, he actually took longer to come to that conclusion than he had the first time, because the first time, he never even bothered to talk to Uriel first.

Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5] 6 7 ... 14