Author Topic: What do you wish would be done MORE in urban fantasy?  (Read 42955 times)

Offline Quantus

  • Special Collections Division
  • Needs A Life
  • ****
  • Posts: 25216
  • He Who Lurks Around
    • View Profile
Re: What do you wish would be done MORE in urban fantasy?
« Reply #105 on: December 29, 2007, 07:02:05 PM »
Cooper, for inspiration you might want to read "Empire of the East" -(3 books in one) by Saberhagen.  I don't want to ruin it for you but if you want a quick synopsis:

(click to show/hide)


Hold the frickin' phone.... I loved Saberhagen's other books in that continuity, but i didn't know there were  more of them.  I read his 11 Sword books
(click to show/hide)
.


For those of you who keep saying you want to see more mundane people rise to hero-hood, I recommend most of Neil Gaiman's novels (American Gods, Neverwhere and others).  He does just that, where a seemingly ordinary person gets swept up in supernatural goings-on, and usually is just looking for a way out the whole time.  They are fun because the characters usually end up hitting this state of pseudo-insanity where they are no longer surprised by anything they see and begin to simply take everything in stride.
<(o)> <(o)>
        / \
      (o o)
   \==-==/


“We’re all imaginary friends to one another."

"An entire life, an entire personality, can be permanently altered by just one sentence." -An Accidental Villain

Offline Kristine

  • Posty McPostington
  • ***
  • Posts: 8075
  • You can have your own truth, not your own facts
    • View Profile
Re: What do you wish would be done MORE in urban fantasy?
« Reply #106 on: December 29, 2007, 09:12:40 PM »
Quote
They both have a unique view on how magic works and give us charcters that are less predicatable.

Speaking of how magic works, one of the best things I liked about the Tim Powers historical fantasy pirate book 'On Stranger Tides' was the fact that magic had a smell.  Every time some one would do magic there would be a pungent smell of almonds in the air (something most of the non-magic characters didn't notice, but was a warning for the reader).  I thought that was an original idea. 

Quantas347, Empire of the East, in my opinion was a little more toward the urban fantasy setting because the characters would, once in a while, use some kind of modern convenience and at one point they find, and use, a tank.  Where the Swords books seem to be in almost a wholly fantasy medieval setting except for the Greco-roman gods
"When I was 5 years old my mother always told me that happiness was the key to life. When I went to school, they asked me what I wanted to be when i grew up. I wrote down “Happy”. They told me i didn’t understand the assignment, and I told them they didn’t understand life. "
-John Lennon-

Offline Quantus

  • Special Collections Division
  • Needs A Life
  • ****
  • Posts: 25216
  • He Who Lurks Around
    • View Profile
Re: What do you wish would be done MORE in urban fantasy?
« Reply #107 on: December 29, 2007, 10:21:07 PM »
And the occasional flashlight...which interestingly enough seemed to be the most common surviving technology.  Hmmm...maybe I should invest some in Maglight... :P
<(o)> <(o)>
        / \
      (o o)
   \==-==/


“We’re all imaginary friends to one another."

"An entire life, an entire personality, can be permanently altered by just one sentence." -An Accidental Villain

MatthewD44

  • Guest
Re: What do you wish would be done MORE in urban fantasy?
« Reply #108 on: December 29, 2007, 11:55:42 PM »
Thank you Kristine I have been racking my brain for months trying to remember the name of that book "On Stranger Tides" I loved that book and wanted to reread it...

Offline Shecky

  • Bartender
  • O. M. G.
  • ****
  • Posts: 34672
  • Feh.
    • View Profile
Re: What do you wish would be done MORE in urban fantasy?
« Reply #109 on: December 30, 2007, 01:32:10 PM »
Hold the frickin' phone.... I loved Saberhagen's other books in that continuity, but i didn't know there were  more of them.  I read his 11 Sword books
(click to show/hide)
.


For those of you who keep saying you want to see more mundane people rise to hero-hood, I recommend most of Neil Gaiman's novels (American Gods, Neverwhere and others).  He does just that, where a seemingly ordinary person gets swept up in supernatural goings-on, and usually is just looking for a way out the whole time.  They are fun because the characters usually end up hitting this state of pseudo-insanity where they are no longer surprised by anything they see and begin to simply take everything in stride.

Yeah, and don't forget that in Good Omens, the one person who really does come out a hero is the most humdrum of the bunch. Sure, he's got this ability, but in every other situation, it's a BAD one to have. And he ain't purty.
Official forum rules and precepts; please read: http://www.jimbutcheronline.com/bb/index.php/topic,23096.0.html

Quote from: Stanton Infeld
Well, if you couldn't do that with your bulls***, Leonard, I suspect the lad's impervious.

Offline The Corvidian

  • Conversationalist
  • **
  • Posts: 987
  • I like crows and ravens.
    • View Profile
Re: What do you wish would be done MORE in urban fantasy?
« Reply #110 on: January 04, 2008, 04:29:56 AM »
Hey, Jami, check out C.E. Murphy's Heart of Stone for a regular human heroine.
Clarke's Third Law: Sufficently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.

Niven's Converse to Clarke's 3rd Law: Sufficently analyzed magic is indistinguishable from science.

Offline Suilan

  • Conversationalist
  • **
  • Posts: 145
    • View Profile
Re: What do you wish would be done MORE in urban fantasy?
« Reply #111 on: January 04, 2008, 06:07:37 PM »
Another thing I would like more in Urban fantasy: language and description that are above high-school level. Right now, I am despairing of the genre again. I've tried three different authors and haven't gotten past page 20 or so because on 20 pages I haven't found a single thought or idea or piece of description that had me thinking: wow, nicely put. I mean, it is all so trite and mediocre, as if the author had jotted down the first image or thought that came to him. Flat, unimaginative language puts me off before I can even get to whatever exciting development the plot might take on page 50 or so.
« Last Edit: January 04, 2008, 06:29:58 PM by Suilan »
Style and structure are the essence of a book; great ideas are hogwash. -- Vladimir Nabokov

Have something to say, and say it as clearly as you can. Everything that can be said can be said clearly. -- Ludwig Wittgenstein

Offline Sorryman105

  • Posty McPostington
  • ***
  • Posts: 5999
  • Come into the dungeon!
    • View Profile
Re: What do you wish would be done MORE in urban fantasy?
« Reply #112 on: January 06, 2008, 04:40:14 PM »
Hey, Jami, check out C.E. Murphy's Heart of Stone for a regular human heroine.

Another good series, I'm just joping she doesn't suddenly discover unkown powers and become queen bitch of New York.
Forevermore we shall giggle and snicker in our rightful place, this place, OUR BAR!

Offline the neurovore of Zur-En-Aargh

  • O. M. G.
  • ***
  • Posts: 39098
  • Riding eternal, shiny and Firefox
    • View Profile
Re: What do you wish would be done MORE in urban fantasy?
« Reply #113 on: January 07, 2008, 03:58:15 AM »
Another thing I would like more in Urban fantasy: language and description that are above high-school level. Right now, I am despairing of the genre again. I've tried three different authors and haven't gotten past page 20 or so because on 20 pages I haven't found a single thought or idea or piece of description that had me thinking: wow, nicely put. I mean, it is all so trite and mediocre, as if the author had jotted down the first image or thought that came to him. Flat, unimaginative language puts me off before I can even get to whatever exciting development the plot might take on page 50 or so.

At risk of getting repetitive, Mike Carye's Felix Castor books struck me as good on this; Castor has a knack for the telling Raymond Chandler-esque metaphor or description; for example mentioning one of his professional rivals as often initially striking people as motherly, but adding 'If I were describing her myself, "mother" might well be the first two syllables I'd use."
Mildly OCD. Please do not troll.

"What do you mean, Lawful Silly isn't a valid alignment?"

kittensgame, Sandcastle Builder, Homestuck, Welcome to Night Vale, Civ III, lots of print genre SF, and old-school SATT gaming if I had the time.  Also Pandemic Legacy is the best game ever.

Offline Magus Dresdenarus

  • Participant
  • *
  • Posts: 35
    • View Profile
Re: What do you wish would be done MORE in urban fantasy?
« Reply #114 on: January 31, 2008, 05:41:46 AM »
One thing I really want to see less of: Attempting to make magic a form of "science."  (Sorry, Mr. Butcher. That's the one thing I dislike about the Dresden-verse.)  Magic(k) isn't science. Magic is religion.

When magic is assumed as science, it also assumes that, like science, magic is dispassionate towards mythology, culture, and tradition.  In short, the urban fantasy axiom is "Magic is the same everywhere. Culture and tradition are just 'flavorings.' "  In the real world, that just isn't true.  Not all magic systems fit into the Egyptian/Golden Dawn/Wicca template.  (Disagree ?  Try plugging in the ancient Chinese, Babylonian, or tribal New Guinean magic systems into that template.)

It seems to me that all modern urban fantasy takes a magic-is-science approach because it is dispassionate and, as a result, won't offend anyone.  In short, magic has become politically correct.

If your character is a Catholic, give him a Catholic viewpoint and make his magic match it according to Catholic tradition; If your character is Wiccan, give him (or her) a Wiccan viewpoint and make his magic match it.

Sure, it takes a LOT of extra research.  But it makes magic less homogenous; As a result, you gain real-world verisimilitude and lose that "I cast a ninth-level fireball. Roll your saving throw" feel.
Cartoonus Supersonicus: Common North American Road Runner (Beep-Beep)

Magus Dresdenarus: Common North American Working-Class Wizard (Toot-toot)

Offline The Corvidian

  • Conversationalist
  • **
  • Posts: 987
  • I like crows and ravens.
    • View Profile
Re: What do you wish would be done MORE in urban fantasy?
« Reply #115 on: January 31, 2008, 05:50:47 AM »
One thing I really want to see less of: Attempting to make magic a form of "science."  (Sorry, Mr. Butcher. That's the one thing I dislike about the Dresden-verse.)  Magic(k) isn't science. Magic is religion.

When magic is assumed as science, it also assumes that, like science, magic is dispassionate towards mythology, culture, and tradition.  In short, the urban fantasy axiom is "Magic is the same everywhere. Culture and tradition are just 'flavorings.' "  In the real world, that just isn't true.  Not all magic systems fit into the Egyptian/Golden Dawn/Wicca template.  (Disagree ?  Try plugging in the ancient Chinese, Babylonian, or tribal New Guinean magic systems into that template.)

It seems to me that all modern urban fantasy takes a magic-is-science approach because it is dispassionate and, as a result, won't offend anyone.  In short, magic has become politically correct.

If your character is a Catholic, give him a Catholic viewpoint and make his magic match it according to Catholic tradition; If your character is Wiccan, give him (or her) a Wiccan viewpoint and make his magic match it.

Sure, it takes a LOT of extra research.  But it makes magic less homogenous; As a result, you gain real-world verisimilitude and lose that "I cast a ninth-level fireball. Roll your saving throw" feel.

According to some sources, magic grew out of religion, and that at one time, the wizard and the scientist were one and the same.
Clarke's Third Law: Sufficently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.

Niven's Converse to Clarke's 3rd Law: Sufficently analyzed magic is indistinguishable from science.

Offline Magus Dresdenarus

  • Participant
  • *
  • Posts: 35
    • View Profile
Re: What do you wish would be done MORE in urban fantasy?
« Reply #116 on: January 31, 2008, 06:00:09 AM »
According to some sources, magic grew out of religion, and that at one time, the wizard and the scientist were one and the same.

And these sources are ?
Cartoonus Supersonicus: Common North American Road Runner (Beep-Beep)

Magus Dresdenarus: Common North American Working-Class Wizard (Toot-toot)

Offline Quantus

  • Special Collections Division
  • Needs A Life
  • ****
  • Posts: 25216
  • He Who Lurks Around
    • View Profile
Re: What do you wish would be done MORE in urban fantasy?
« Reply #117 on: January 31, 2008, 02:37:10 PM »
One thing I really want to see less of: Attempting to make magic a form of "science."  (Sorry, Mr. Butcher. That's the one thing I dislike about the Dresden-verse.)  Magic(k) isn't science. Magic is religion.

When magic is assumed as science, it also assumes that, like science, magic is dispassionate towards mythology, culture, and tradition.  In short, the urban fantasy axiom is "Magic is the same everywhere. Culture and tradition are just 'flavorings.' "  In the real world, that just isn't true.  Not all magic systems fit into the Egyptian/Golden Dawn/Wicca template.  (Disagree ?  Try plugging in the ancient Chinese, Babylonian, or tribal New Guinean magic systems into that template.)

It seems to me that all modern urban fantasy takes a magic-is-science approach because it is dispassionate and, as a result, won't offend anyone.  In short, magic has become politically correct.

If your character is a Catholic, give him a Catholic viewpoint and make his magic match it according to Catholic tradition; If your character is Wiccan, give him (or her) a Wiccan viewpoint and make his magic match it.

Sure, it takes a LOT of extra research.  But it makes magic less homogenous; As a result, you gain real-world verisimilitude and lose that "I cast a ninth-level fireball. Roll your saving throw" feel.

While I can agree with you to some point, in that overly "crunchy" magic systems in fantasy novels can leave the sound of dice in your head.  But I dont really think thats the case in Dresden.  While sure, Harry personally looks at it as a Science sort of thing, its constantly pointed out that that is not how everyone does it, and in fact it almost a minority viewpoint;  magic is too subjective to be considered a science.  Michael uses magic, its just powered by God, wiccan magic practitioners can create holy water in their shrines, Etc.  The only homogeneous things I can think of are the basic ways a human handles the energy (words/focii/gestures as mental insulation which is a common theme worldwide, the death curse, the murphyonic field, slowed aging) and some of the distinctions made about mortal magic (like how its the only thing that can canll outsiders, etc).  Most of these seem to me to give a basic framework that allows all types of magic to exist.  The problem about saying that the magic is a purely catholic thing or purely a wiccan thing is that people then ask why that one is real and all the other types of magic out there are fake?  People (or at least me) like some sort of unified view of the world. 

Aslo throughout Harry's association with Michael, it seems to me that his view of things is slowing swinging towards the faith side.  Its one of my favorite continuing plots, the Harry's reconciliation with God.   
<(o)> <(o)>
        / \
      (o o)
   \==-==/


“We’re all imaginary friends to one another."

"An entire life, an entire personality, can be permanently altered by just one sentence." -An Accidental Villain

Offline the neurovore of Zur-En-Aargh

  • O. M. G.
  • ***
  • Posts: 39098
  • Riding eternal, shiny and Firefox
    • View Profile
Re: What do you wish would be done MORE in urban fantasy?
« Reply #118 on: January 31, 2008, 04:28:59 PM »
It seems to me that all modern urban fantasy takes a magic-is-science approach because it is dispassionate and, as a result, won't offend anyone.  In short, magic has become politically correct.

Personally, when I write magic as science it's because it allows the reader to have a reasonable notion of what is and isn't possible, so you can play fair within the ground rules you set up.  Magic that is not rational means that whatever difficulties and dilemmas your characters get into, there's always the lurking possibility that one of them can pull a magical solution out of their backside and save the day, even if you don't actually do that; and to me that undermines the possibility of generating many kinds of narrative tension.

Fictional takes on magic where you can hear the dice rolling for the damage the fireball does suck, I have no argument there.  The other thing that strikes me as a possibility for magic-as-science, though, and that I've not often seen much done with, is magic-as-science that feels like actual real scientific research does, and has the excitement and adventure of being on an expanding frontier of human knowledge.  As a working sicentist in my day job, this is one of the things I aspire to do in my fiction.
« Last Edit: January 31, 2008, 04:32:49 PM by neurovore »
Mildly OCD. Please do not troll.

"What do you mean, Lawful Silly isn't a valid alignment?"

kittensgame, Sandcastle Builder, Homestuck, Welcome to Night Vale, Civ III, lots of print genre SF, and old-school SATT gaming if I had the time.  Also Pandemic Legacy is the best game ever.

Offline Quantus

  • Special Collections Division
  • Needs A Life
  • ****
  • Posts: 25216
  • He Who Lurks Around
    • View Profile
Re: What do you wish would be done MORE in urban fantasy?
« Reply #119 on: January 31, 2008, 05:06:02 PM »
Personally, when I write magic as science it's because it allows the reader to have a reasonable notion of what is and isn't possible, so you can play fair within the ground rules you set up.  Magic that is not rational means that whatever difficulties and dilemmas your characters get into, there's always the lurking possibility that one of them can pull a magical solution out of their backside and save the day, even if you don't actually do that; and to me that undermines the possibility of generating many kinds of narrative tension.
Exactly.  I want enough eexplanation of the workings of the magic of the world that when the hero does something suitably impressive, I feel that too.  I like magic having some amount of defined limitations, so that when they are pushed, surpassed, or even just circumvented with nice innovation, we feel as impressed as we should.  An impressive amount of fireball in Dresden is a far cry from an impressive amount in Alera, for example.
Quote
Fictional takes on magic where you can hear the dice rolling for the damage the fireball does suck, I have no argument there.  The other thing that strikes me as a possibility for magic-as-science, though, and that I've not often seen much done with, is magic-as-science that feels like actual real scientific research does, and has the excitement and adventure of being on an expanding frontier of human knowledge.  As a working sicentist in my day job, this is one of the things I aspire to do in my fiction.
One of the reasons I enjoyed Full-Metal Alchemist so much.  I thought they took teh whole "magic still has to deal with physics" idea to a new level, and did it well.
<(o)> <(o)>
        / \
      (o o)
   \==-==/


“We’re all imaginary friends to one another."

"An entire life, an entire personality, can be permanently altered by just one sentence." -An Accidental Villain