Suggest Topics Here!

[Tami Seven]

*shrug* what are you trying to accomplish with the reference? 

Title it based on that.  By the way, if you need some help getting the bullets ironed out, you can pull my code from that earlier response I made about the sub bullets by using the quote function and use it as a guide on how to get it done.

Oh, I was still working on cleaning up the bullets.  Looks like its been locked. Guess I can always try again on a new thread.

[Serack]

Oh, I was still working on cleaning up the bullets.  Looks like its been locked. Guess I can always try again on a new thread.

I've never unlocked a locked thread and kept it in the spoilers section afterwords.

Would you like to keep that one as the primary, or do you want to do the new one?  I'll unlock it again for now, but it seems that it will lock again sometime tonight, and any other night I unlock it until I move it.

[Tami Seven]

I've never unlocked a locked thread and kept it in the spoilers section afterwords.

Would you like to keep that one as the primary, or do you want to do the new one?  I'll unlock it again for now, but it seems that it will lock again sometime tonight, and any other night I unlock it until I move it.

I understand.  I'll work in a new thread,  one that is clearer and better organized. I'll copy what I need from it for the updated version.

[Serack]

I understand.  I'll work in a new thread,  one that is clearer and better organized. I'll copy what I need from it for the updated version.

Ok, if nothing else, the unlock should make it easier to pull the code from the old post.

If you didn't notice from my reply containing a reposting from my 2011 topic, this happens to be a subject I find important

[۞†Grey Warden†۞]

Is nobody gonna put my well established theory that LC fixed itself, and is in fact, Demon reach?

[Serack]

Is nobody gonna put my well established theory that LC fixed itself, and is in fact, Demon reach?

LINKS!!!

*rumages through the topics you have posted....*

Oh noes, did we miss it?

If someone suggests a topic here, the curators generally try to transfer it around the time it locks unless it is a reference topic.

[۞†Grey Warden†۞]

I'm sorry, I was just kidding. 

[123456789blaaa]

I'd like to nominate my theory thread Has Mab become something more?. It's over 14 pages long so I think that gives it a bit of credibility.

I actually think some more conversation could be gained from it (I'd like to respond to one poster in particular too). Sadly it is locked. Priscellie suggested copying the best parts and making a new thread but 14 pages is a bit much. I know that threads are automatically locked and purged after a certain amount of time as not to overtax the server but could it be unlocked if it gets into the Reference Collection?

[Serack]

I'd like to nominate my theory thread Has Mab become something more?. It's over 14 pages long so I think that gives it a bit of credibility.

I actually think some more conversation could be gained from it (I'd like to respond to one poster in particular too). Sadly it is locked. Priscellie suggested copying the best parts and making a new thread but 14 pages is a bit much. I know that threads are automatically locked and purged after a certain amount of time as not to overtax the server but could it be unlocked if it gets into the Reference Collection?

Unlocked and bumped.  I don't think the unlock will last long.  Post again here to remind me to xfer or if you need more time.

[Serack]

in addition to the topic The Count just pointed out, I'll need to xfer this other topic of his soon

Also his topic Tehom/The primordial darkness before the light=Outsiders

I also want to keep tabs on this reference heavy theoryish topic I generated this week about Magic sticking to Outsiders

Come on guys, if you know of great references that should be archived let us know

[Serack]

Can I get a 2nd for this topic?
http://www.jimbutcheronline.com/bb/index.php/topic,35012.0.html

(a lot of it might be echoed by or be an echo of other theory topics already archived, but this one seems to have been written rather soon after the CD release, and is rather extensive)

[123456789blaaa]

Can I get a 2nd for this topic?
http://www.jimbutcheronline.com/bb/index.php/topic,35012.0.html

(a lot of it might be echoed by or be an echo of other theory topics already archived, but this one seems to have been written rather soon after the CD release, and is rather extensive)

Ideally I'd prefer to make another thread on the subject that also incorporates the many great theories other people have come up with as well. Given how time-consuming and boring it is to search through thread after thread however, that's probably not going to happen...

So yeah, seconding.

[Serack]

This topic countering this topic is indexed in Elegast's theory index.

It's got 8 pages of discussion and I was hoping someone would give input on if it should be archived or not.

[knnn]

Personally, I don't think it need archiving.  The idea in the first post, while original, doesn't really get debated.  It quickly evolves into a discussion of mantles, Mab, etc.  The discussion is interesting in of itself, but not something you couldn't find in similar threads.

[123456789blaaa]

in addition to the topic The Count just pointed out, I'll need to xfer this other topic of his soon

Also his topic Tehom/The primordial darkness before the light=Outsiders

I also want to keep tabs on this reference heavy theoryish topic I generated this week about Magic sticking to Outsiders

Come on guys, if you know of great references that should be archived let us know

Just a reminder in case you've forgotten. Take your time if you're just busy.