Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - kacowkachow

Pages: [1]
1
Display Case / Re: Perfect Casting, part 2
« on: August 25, 2012, 01:12:44 AM »
WoJ states he's 20 in DB. Since Billy's in grad school in the same book, this seems reasonable.
Missed that WoJ, so yeah, Gonzalez is probably too old at this point to swing that.

I agree in part but it seems insulting to Hispanics not to have a major role played by someone of the same backround.
Eh, my main concern would be having someone who can accurately play Ramirez. As long as they have the appropriate amount of swagger and sincerity it would be acceptable.

(click to show/hide)

2
Display Case / Re: Perfect Casting, part 2
« on: August 24, 2012, 12:59:46 AM »
He looks a little old, IMO. Ramirez is 20 in DB per WoJ, so he's 17 in his first appearance in SK. I considered Thomas Dekker for the role, but he's not hispanic.
I tend toward agreeing with you, in the next couple years they could probably swing it via good make up and costume design.

Do we know Ramirez actual age? All I remember in Dead Beat is that he is younger than Billy.

3
Display Case / Re: Perfect Casting, part 2
« on: August 23, 2012, 09:54:07 PM »
A candidate for Ramirez: Rick Gonzalez


He has good comedic acting chops, and I've seen him in some smaller dramatic roles. I haven't seen anything where he has swagger exactly like Ramirez, but I'm fairly certain he could pull it off.


4
DF Books / Re: Did you discover the books because of the TV Show?
« on: August 20, 2012, 11:21:20 PM »
It would depend on how closely they followed the books (religiously i hope), but he could do Harry plus an array of the side characters that only show up once in a while. 
IMO one of the best arguments for animation. They can capture everything in the books in their ridiculously awesome glory.

Often, but not always.  Futurama, for example, always impressed me with the breath of characters a given VA could cover.
Billy West and John Dimaggio really are amazing voice actors.

Edit: Don't know how many of you have seen this but, Star Wars read as a radio play by various voice actors in their famous character's voices. (link) Hilarious stuff.

5
DF Books / Re: Did you discover the books because of the TV Show?
« on: August 20, 2012, 10:58:49 PM »
Terrence Mann as Bob was one of the things that I found great about the actual TV series. I'd love to see him come back for that.

Marsters acting one or two roles would probably be the limit for this kind of production, voice acting is a lot of work and a pain to do. Harry and Sanya maybe? Although, he is undeniably awesome in the audio books, so I could go either way on it.

6
DF Books / Re: Did you discover the books because of the TV Show?
« on: August 20, 2012, 10:35:59 PM »
There's actually some good things happening in American animation these days because all those kids who grew up on Batman:TAS (and the like) and comic books are getting into that industry.

In particular, Young Justice and the two Avatar series' are fairly good all around shows. For quirkyness we've got Adventure Time, Regular Show, Misadventures of Flapjack, and The Boondocks. I suppose there's also My Little Pony, not my bag but the Bronies seem to enjoy it. At least it isn't condescending and it appreciates it's fans. Forgot to mention Phineas and Ferb, great show as well.

Marsters doing some voice acting would be pretty cool, and I could see his popularity with the Whedonites helping the show take off.

Heck, Toonami just came back recently, that would be a great place for an animated DF to go.

7
Display Case / Re: Perfect Casting, part 2
« on: August 16, 2012, 03:25:51 AM »
The combination of his roles in A History of Violence and Eastern Promises has solidified Viggo Mortensen as the pick for Kincaid for me.

8
DF Books / Re: Did you discover the books because of the TV Show?
« on: August 15, 2012, 04:32:14 AM »
Remember that really great yet short lived series Kings?  It was a modern day adaptation of the biblical story of David.  It was cancelled partly for costing what was called an "extravagant" sum of 10mil for the pilot and 4mil per episode (same as fringe, far less than boardwalk empires).  Most of that went to the set/location rentals.  It also tried an experimental and ultimately terrible marketing strategy. 
I did enjoy Kings quite a bit, thankfully I found it after it aired so I didn't have to endure the break. Ian McShane really acted some bits off during it's short run.

IMO one of the more terrible things that could happen quality wise, would be getting picked up by one of the major networks. Their reliance on Nielsen to determine what to keep and cancel is kind of problematic, not to mention their push toward the center of the bell curve. HBO on the other hand, picks up interesting shows to drive subscriptions, so episode to episode ratings don't matter nearly as much. AMC and FX aren't as good, but they are still more savvy about actual numbers (e.g. people who watch it on DVR or people without cable but who stream content) than NBC, FOX, ABC, etc.

I can't fault their business model, because it's making them money, but the cancellation of interesting and one-off shows is kind of disheartening.

9
DF Books / Re: Did you discover the books because of the TV Show?
« on: August 15, 2012, 03:36:55 AM »
I dunno, Ive seen some pretty decent CGI on TV shows these days.  So long as the production crews care enough not to cut corners and let is suck, they can pull off some pretty good stuff even on a weekly show.
That is true. If the crew and channel are behind it, they can really work wonders. The Blackwater episode from GoT is a great example of what you can do with CGI when your producers believe in your show (they had to beg above their episode budget to get that battle shot). The only problem is making it pretty costs a lot of money, and the places you really see that investment pay off is in dynamic areas like fire. It is definitely do-able though.

I would honestly rather it go to either a Series like Game of Thrones, or else a well funded Miniseries or something.  Short of a Peter Jackson extended edition epic monstrosity, Id be afraid of what they'd have to cut out to fit it all into a feature length film.
I would love to see it picked up by someone that can really make it true to the books like HBO. FX and AMC also wouldn't be terrible places, as they enjoy quirky programming and generally live and let live with fairly modest budgets.

Another format that might be good, depending on how streamlined the story gets, is the way the BBC's Sherlock shoots. They have three episodes a season, but each episode is ~90 minutes long. If you've had the good fortune to watch it, it provides really nice narrative completion as opposed to the cliffhanger at the end of every episode for a weekly series.

It doesn't really matter what happens, as I'll most likely end up watching it no matter public access or premium cable.   :D

Episode costs for some shows because they were interesting:
GoT (HBO): Pilot-$10 million, Per ep. as of S2-$6 million
Boardwalk Empire (HBO): Pilot-$18 million, Per ep-$5 million
Fringe (FOX): Pilot-$10 million, Per ep-$4 million

10
DF Books / Re: Did you discover the books because of the TV Show?
« on: August 14, 2012, 10:54:07 PM »
In fact, I have to admit that I like the show better than the books.
GoT benefits from great costuming and set design, which is the reason that I enjoy the show that much more than the books. There's only so many multi-page descriptions of belt buckles I can read. Also, they have a pretty great cast, and the characters really pop out with a lot of nuance. Plus, who doesn't enjoy a little sexposition.

I'd love to see the DF on the big or small screen (again-ish), but I'd be a little worried about special effects. CGI is expensive, and you can only make slinging around tubes of fire look so real. They could definitely pull it off if they took a practical approach with everything except the actual magic--seeing a full sized RCV costume would be super cool.

A direction I wouldn't mind as an alternative to live-action would be animation. It has the benefit of being able to show everything as they're described in the books, which would be pretty amazing. The only downside is the divide in acceptance which would impact the popularity somewhat, or so I would imagine.

11
DFRPG / Re: Cursed Items
« on: April 18, 2012, 03:38:12 AM »
Here's something I dropped in a party for a different game that you might find interesting.

Eyeglasses of Insecurity (They thought they were hearing the true feelings of people for extra funsies)

Anyone who puts on these stylish modern eyeglasses hears their greatest insecurities espoused by the person they're looking at through the glasses.

Some aspects might be:

Afraid to Find Out
Insecure
Everyone Hates Me
Worst Flaws Confirmed

12
DFRPG / Re: DFRPG Character Manager v2.0
« on: April 14, 2012, 03:34:31 PM »
The new manager is looking great. Awesome work on it.

However, it seems as though adding a custom effect isn't working. The problem being that it always throws out: "There is no description for this effect" no matter what I put in the description field.

Thanks for the work, looking forward to the next update.

13
You might consider populating it with something like ghosts chained to monsters. Obviously representing the prisoners and their darker natures.

There would be at least two states:

The first might be something like the prisoners who wanted to overcome their darkness. Their ghost would be locked in combat with the monster, maybe forever Inferno style or until one wins. Presumably if the ghost won it could disappear and if the monster won it would just roam around indulging in whatever it represented.

The second group would be those who were in harmony with their darker natures. They would essentially act like the unchained monster.

You might want to throw in something like an arena/battle pit that can't be escaped as long as the chains are connected. If you do it this way then you would also have the option of having a ghost/monster pair that has been battling other monsters and ghosts for however long the prison has been in operation. Could be a good battle for the PCs.

14
DFRPG / Re: Transmutation
« on: March 15, 2012, 03:15:05 AM »
I'm fairly new to the game, but from what I understand you can't have an item that is "always on".


You might want to check out this thread about the magical items patch: link

From the thread:
Quote
Before you worry about defensive items and frequency of use, consider this - you'd only lose one "use" of the effect whenever it needs to be triggered, not every time you defend. If you dodge an attack, that doesn't use up energy - it only applies if you get hit and the item is what blocks/absorbs the hit.

So it makes defensive magical items more of a mystical ass-saving measure, which feels a lot more like how it's described in the books - it's Harry's last resort for when he can't dodge or otherwise protect himself. "Luckily, the blade was stopped on the flaps of my enchanted duster, or I'd have been a dead man," etc.

From that same thread Harry's duster might be something like:
Quote
So would Harry's coat (made with Great Lore, and one item slot) be something like:

The coat provides either a Fair (+2) Block or Armor: 1 up to 5 times per session?

Because that's as close as can be gotten with it's current statting, but this version (made with Great Lore and two item slots) looks closer:

The coat provides either a Great (+4) Block or Armor: 2 up to 3 times per session.

Pages: [1]