Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Archangel62

Pages: 1 [2]
16
DFRPG / Re: Confusion on the 'were' section
« on: July 28, 2010, 07:15:25 AM »
One thing I will admit, and this is just me wondering, I was a bit curious as to why you didn't get a discount for having the powers locked away in a form. Was it because it could be called out at any time? I only ask because it seems off in terms of mileage (or is the human form considered the discount?)

17
DFRPG / Re: Confusion on the 'were' section
« on: July 27, 2010, 10:24:12 AM »
And on a different note, were-creatures often cost very different amounts. A Were-Gorilla is actually likely to be pretty cheap:

Ecchoes of the Beast [-1]
Beast Change [-1]

Human Form [+1] effecting
Inhuman Strength [-2]

Total minimum of -3. Maybe add Inhuman Toughness if you like or Defend My Tribe from Moe's stats in OW, and you have yourself a gorilla.

More or less my plan, I was more making sure I hadn't missed something, and I thank you (you being everyone who responded) for helping me and showing me that the way I read it was accurate. I just wanted to make sure I understood it correctly.

18
DFRPG / Confusion on the 'were' section
« on: July 27, 2010, 07:33:50 AM »
Some friends are looking at doing a Dresden Files game in the future and I'm toying with the idea of a crime fighting weregorilla. The problem I have is this, I was looking at the example for the werewolf, the wolf form takes up 6 refresh, and then 1 for the shifting ability, 1 for the ability to talk to wolves, and you get one refresh back, net being 7. Does this mean that I couldn't play a werewolf like the alphas (and not have any mortal stunts) until a chest deep power level game or did I read things wrong? I only ask because it seems odd when looking at things of that same power level like the wizard, it seems a bit low so I would like clarification if anyone can help.

19
Display Case / Re: Things Harry Dresden Is No Longer Allowed to Do
« on: November 14, 2008, 04:49:17 AM »
The funny thing about the jokes concerning Batman and Robin is that historically, it was a common thing to happen, not the gay parts.  Craftsmen for centuries took boys into their homes as apprentices, to train them up in their own speciality, so all Bruce Wayne did was find a boy whose need for Revenge was as great as his own and train him.

IIRC, Robin was not supposed to be so brilliantly costumed but in something closer to the Batman's own outfit but a combination of factors over-ruled this, including Kane's refusal to have Batman and mini-batman, thus the bolder costume.

Most of the gay jokes about Batman seem to have come about because of the television series and to be quite honest, they were just short of flaming in that.  In the books themselves, Bruce Wayne had an active sexual life, as much as the times would allow and when he was older, so did Dick Greyson.  My impression of the books did not show Bruce Wayne as the sort of date which a willing woman could not score with or be assured that no matter how willing she might become, her virtue would be safe.

IIRC, he had a sexual relationship with Catwoman in the books and they had a daughter.  Now it's not that gays can't have sex and babies but I never saw Catwoman as the type that could accept sharing.


Finally, you could say much the same about Eb's taking Harry into his home.  It is not as if the robes of a White Council Wizard are that macho to begin with.  He sure as hell put Harry into as many dangerous scrapes as Batman did with Robin.  All Robin could do was die, Harry could have lost his soul.

Yes, however Superdickery.com has some rather amusing bits involving the running gag.

Pages: 1 [2]