Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Ms Duck

Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5] 6 7 ... 57
61
It flat outright says Mab had a plan for bringing Moly in, that she did it, and she planned it.

at this point the only reason I can think of for having the gatekeeper fix LC was because Mab told him too.. he was acting as her agent.

ya see ?


Actually, I've been wondering about that WoJ since Cold Days came out myself. I was hoping to get your feeling at some point on whether the Summer Fire attack on the Winter Wellspring was part of Mab's plan or Nemesis'.

As for the rest, have you considered that even if Molly's kidnapping was part of Mab's plan, Harry's rescue attempt maybe wasn't? I mean, when you think about it, I could see many more advantages for Mab in keeping Molly rather than letting her go.
- It would be easy to threaten her with revealing her crimes against the Law to the Council. She'd be the equivalent of Elaine, owing favors to Winter, being shaped by them, and being prepared for her future role as Lady.
- It would be a heck of a thing to hold over Harry's head. He likely would have been more than willing to take on the Winter Knight position much earlier in order to get Molly back from Mab.

In your view, what advantage does Mab get from allowing Molly to be rescued? I can only think of three, and to be honest, they all seem much weaker reasons to let her go than the two alternatives for keeping her I listed above.
1. Mab would not want to make enemies with the WG's forces. Considering that the first time we meet Lea, she was part of a scheme to unmake the strongest Sword of the Cross, that doesn't really sound like Winter to me.
2. Mab figured having an apprentice would make Harry level up faster, for lack of a better term. This is something Harry himself mentions in White Night, so it's possible.
3. Keeping Molly with Harry instead of with Winter kept her out of Maeve and Nemesis' crosshairs. I think if Mab had a reason for wanting to Molly rescued, it would have to be this one.

Is there something I'm missing?

well .. what I believe..is that Mab kidnapped Moly because she has a plan for molly, and she needed to get molly to AT in such a way that nemesis would not realize how important molly was.

of course, im the nut who think Mab hid LC from Harry in TC, to force him to go to demon reach, because she had plan later that required using demon reach and harry as part of a trap for her enemies.

now if only she could lure them into direct action.. by say letting her knight be killed...

rather then re write the whole thing out, have a link:

http://www.jimbutcheronline.com/bb/index.php/topic,32663.0.html

62
frankly it all smacks of discworld's super strong androcentric principle, from which you can conclude the entire purpose of the universe was to supply me with a nice a sandwich and a beer.

63
hi Lurker !


two thoughts:

In the DF, as far as we know, the other potential universes don't collapse- they continue to exist. That's why even someone who can see the future, like Mab, can't be 100% correct- there are two many possible future universes.

second, the idea that just because people face the exact same decision again they will make the exact same choice is probably a bit off too. Uriel says most people are predictable, but some aren't. In the zillions and zillions of decisions made in that time loop, all it would take would be a few key ones off to throw the loop out of loop.

its the monkeys writing Shakespeare problem, except this time we would need the exact same monkey to write the exact same page.  ;)

64
ever think of redoing this with knowledge of
(click to show/hide)

(click to show/hide)

65
OR, JB didn't mention TTH because it's going to be a surprise later.  He's not going to say "Ask yourself why Mab had Time-Travellin' Harry bring Molly in.".  And why would she chose Molly at that point?  Not because Harry and Molly were already so close.  But maybe because TTH demanded it, so Mab took an interest in her.

ya see ?   ;) :D ;D

that's.. unique. It gets a medal for the virtue of having never been tried before.

66
the biggest problem with the gatekeeper fixed LC, for me, is this WOJ:

Quote
Ask yourself why Mab had Molly brought in.  What chain of events did that set in motion?  What secondary effects came about because of it?  Ultimately, Mab can always go to the Wyld and draw in more muscle to replace fallen thugs.  If worst comes to worst, with just a few "seed" fae, she could rear up enough Changelings to repopulate her cadre within a human generation or two--nothing, to a being thousands of years old. 

It flat outright says Mab had a plan for bringing Moly in, that she did it, and she planned it.

at this point the only reason I can think of for having the gatekeeper fix LC was because Mab told him too.. he was acting as her agent.

ya see ?

68
I figured Lea fixed it.  Her realm is right there in the Never Never.

hi new person !

lea was doing an icicle impression. which is why Mab was covering for her :)

69
Cool idea but then we would need a good head and shoulders picture of MAB (and just for fun Titania)

just hit google for winter queen. there are tons


70
-continuation MISS DUCK i could kiss you! this explains perfectly the minor changes in details in the story like why morts hair and home changed. it was a timeline fluctuation brought on by a predestination loop :-* ;D

me explain by the fact that Harrys actually wrote the books (his biography at some time in the future) and may have made some mistakes. Probably because his note turned KFC extra crispy in changes

71
Odin in CD.

Okies, thanks.

me still talking about energy tho.

72
It does create the ontological paradox, but does not the law of conservation of history as LC has already been fixed.

there is no law of conservation of history I am aware of. Its conservation of energy its breaking. and that , according to Mother Winter, cannot be done.

according to Jim there is an 'exception' to this in that any law can be broken with sufficient magical power. As Mother winter seemed to disagree, methinks the amount of power to do so must be huge.


73
--- later in the conversation----
Is it possible Merlin wasn't just in 3 or 4 dimensions when he built DR?

yup. :)

kind of what ive been saying, I don't think he traveled in time at all

74
Ugh, I didn't like that movie.  The book was decent, but nowhere near his best.

But you're still arguing that what Merlin did in the Dresdenverse is impossible in the Dresdenverse. 

On a related note, my current thinking is that time in the Dresdenverse is a wheel.  The only reason for thinking that is because of the use of FIVE points of time, like the five points of the pentacle used in both Merlin and Harry's magic.  Bob showed a representation of Merlin appearing 5 times in linear fashion to cast the wards, but said that all of them were cast just once in the 5 times.  I think the reason that the number is 5 is because they form a temporal pentacle.  But to do that, time would have to be either a wheel, or a spiral.

No, im not:

because

A: its not a time loop

B: it may not even be time travel

C: we have no frickin idea how it was done

D: a greater god was very likely involved

75
no, in a stable time loop the event creates itself.

TT Harry fixed LC -> Harry Time travels - > TT harry fixes LC

and I don't believe that possible because it violates conservation :)

its often called the ontological paradox.


Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5] 6 7 ... 57