ParanetOnline

The Dresden Files => DF Spoilers => Topic started by: wardenferry419 on August 25, 2017, 12:19:51 PM

Title: Which absent villian will appear in Peace Talks?
Post by: wardenferry419 on August 25, 2017, 12:19:51 PM
Just curious. Some of not been seen for a while. Expect Mavra and Raiths. All villians are welcomed.
Title: Re: Which absent villian will appear in Peace Talks?
Post by: Quantus on August 25, 2017, 03:24:58 PM
Definitely the Wraiths, Im guessing both. They have too much interest in Chicago not to show up.  I tend to think  Black Court rep will show, but I kind of hope we get to meet somebody new for that. 

Beyond that Im hoping to see the Queens and Ladies, The Archive, Vadderung, Ferro and Drakul.  They could show being an Accords matter, but it's a toss up if they want to get involved.  It's rumored to be a fairly bloody book, so I expect some heavy hitters to be present. 




I expect the Senior Council, so I expect Cristos and Langtry.   Are they villains? :P
Title: Re: Which absent villian will appear in Peace Talks?
Post by: Mr. Death on August 25, 2017, 03:37:36 PM
Darth Wannabe from Day Off.
Title: Re: Which absent villian will appear in Peace Talks?
Post by: Quantus on August 25, 2017, 03:42:52 PM
Darth Wannabe from Day Off.
OHGODYESPLEASE!!!

Darth Wannabe rolling up as a Fomor Servitor, or even better as the "Semi-immortal shapeshifting guru" that was mentioned as an Independant Signatory.  I'd love it if Darth was something super-powerful that was just trolling Dresden. 
Title: Re: Which absent villian will appear in Peace Talks?
Post by: Snark Knight on August 25, 2017, 03:53:07 PM
I doubt Mavra will be there. Someone put a question about her into, I think it was, the last AMA. Jim said her story has a planned endpoint, but implied her appearance in Mirror Mirror would be her next.
Title: Re: Which absent villian will appear in Peace Talks?
Post by: Griffyn612 on August 25, 2017, 04:17:14 PM
The Eebs.
Title: Re: Which absent villian will appear in Peace Talks?
Post by: Mira on August 25, 2017, 07:33:01 PM


I wouldn't call Lara Raith exactly a villain...   She is more of a predator than a villain in my opinion..
Title: Re: Which absent villian will appear in Peace Talks?
Post by: DonBugen on August 25, 2017, 07:52:16 PM
Laura Raith is definately a villain. Just because she's used Harry as her catspaw doesn't mean that they're friends or anything.

The Raiths, for certain. I doubt Cowl, as he's due to show up in Mirror Mirror per WOJ, and I don't think that Mavra would show. The Black Court is better off hiding and shoring up their defenses when the rest of the world powers appear.

And I personally think that Kumori died back in Dead Beat.
Title: Re: Which absent villian will appear in Peace Talks?
Post by: wardenferry419 on August 25, 2017, 11:49:58 PM
The Eebs.
Thank you. Forgot about them. Will Add.
Title: Re: Which absent villian will appear in Peace Talks?
Post by: wardenferry419 on August 25, 2017, 11:51:17 PM
Laura Raith is definately a villain. Just because she's used Harry as her catspaw doesn't mean that they're friends or anything.

The Raiths, for certain. I doubt Cowl, as he's due to show up in Mirror Mirror per WOJ, and I don't think that Mavra would show. The Black Court is better off hiding and shoring up their defenses when the rest of the world powers appear.

And I personally think that Kumori died back in Dead Beat.
I think that there is WOJ that suggests differently about Kumori.
Title: Re: Which absent villian will appear in Peace Talks?
Post by: DonBugen on August 26, 2017, 12:05:11 AM
Oo, I'd love to hear it! I haven't encountered that bit about Kumori.

Wouldn't the Eebs have died along with the rest of the rampires?
Title: Re: Which absent villian will appear in Peace Talks?
Post by: raidem on August 26, 2017, 03:57:55 AM
They were in protected never never space.
Title: Re: Which absent villian will appear in Peace Talks?
Post by: DonBugen on August 27, 2017, 07:26:45 PM
Is there a WOJ on that? I dunno, it just kind of pulls the teeth on the bloodline curse if everyone lives if they're on the other side. And because Jim states in book one that red court vampires live more on the other side than on Earth, I don't think that the bloodline curse could have successfully wiped them all out if that was the case. More like, just set them back to the Black Court level of things.
Title: Re: Which absent villian will appear in Peace Talks?
Post by: kazimmoinuddin on August 27, 2017, 09:43:59 PM
That post about the Eebs is not definitive, it simply said at the time of the curse they were in a high security location in the never never, it never actually said they survived. I am betting the curse did hit them, but it is possible using the malleability of the never never, and the intervention of someone powerful, they could have survived the curse, but they would be deeply dependent, and have lost most of their independence.
Title: Re: Which absent villian will appear in Peace Talks?
Post by: KurtinStGeorge on August 28, 2017, 12:02:14 AM
They were in protected never never space.

From everything except their hosts.  I suppose the question we might ask is would the Earl King allow the destruction of the last two members of another supernatural species?  Then again, if he viewed them as parasites; as Nicodemus did, the Earl King might have been happy to eliminate the Eebs.  The only other way they could have survived is if an nemfected member of the Goblin Court freed them.  I remember a long time ago someone suggested Rafferout; the goblin who seemed to be a close adviser to the Earl King, as a good choice for being a nemfected agent.
Title: Re: Which absent villian will appear in Peace Talks?
Post by: raidem on August 28, 2017, 01:27:11 AM
It depends if erlking wanted the eebs preserved.  And I don't think rafferout is nemfected.  Maybe it was the one big guy who wanted to kill both groups.  It was his advice that erlking rejected.
Title: Re: Which absent villian will appear in Peace Talks?
Post by: LordDresden2 on August 28, 2017, 04:13:29 AM
OHGODYESPLEASE!!!

Darth Wannabe rolling up as a Fomor Servitor, or even better as the "Semi-immortal shapeshifting guru" that was mentioned as an Independant Signatory. I'd love it if Darth was something super-powerful that was just trolling Dresden.

I wouldn't.  I really wouldn't.

We've already got plenty of hidden powers and forces.  One reason that that short story was so good was precisely that it didn't have that, it was just a day off that kept trying to go south.  I absolutely loved the interaction between Harry and DW, it was just about a perfect scene, esp. the bit where Darth was more afraid of Harry's .44 than he was Harry's magic (which tells us something about just how ignorant of who and what he was dealing with DW was).

Let DW be DW.

Title: Re: Which absent villian will appear in Peace Talks?
Post by: LordDresden2 on August 28, 2017, 04:47:24 AM

I wouldn't call Lara Raith exactly a villain...   She is more of a predator than a villain in my opinion..

As I noted once a long time ago, we should ask Anna Ashe for her analysis of Lara's nature...but we can't.

Even her predatory nature only goes so far.  From the POV of a rabbit, a wolf is a villain.  It doesn't make much difference from the rabbit's POV if the wolf is not 'evil' in the larger scheme of things, any more than it matter from the wolf's POV that the bear that stole its kill is not 'evil'.  It's still a threat to be dealt with, it's an enemy because of what it is.  The prey isn't safe until the predator is neutralized.

Lara arranged for the deaths of Anna Ashe and the other minor practitioners (albeit indirectly) not out of hunger, but because it made sense as a move in the Game. 

Title: Re: Which absent villian will appear in Peace Talks?
Post by: LordDresden2 on August 28, 2017, 04:48:50 AM
Laura Raith is definately a villain. Just because she's used Harry as her catspaw doesn't mean that they're friends or anything.

They're enemies...but also frenemies, sorta.  I think Harry wants to hate her, but can't quite, she'd like to corrupt him, but is glad when he refuses.  It's a mess.
Title: Re: Which absent villian will appear in Peace Talks?
Post by: KurtinStGeorge on August 28, 2017, 06:19:49 AM
They're enemies...but also frenemies, sorta.  I think Harry wants to hate her, but can't quite, she'd like to corrupt him, but is glad when he refuses.  It's a mess.

Sounds like the beginning of a totally dysfunctional romance.

Title: Re: Which absent villian will appear in Peace Talks?
Post by: DonBugen on August 28, 2017, 12:53:49 PM
Harry and Lara are mutually blackmailing each other into a peaceful stalemate.  Pretty sure that both see the other as potentially useful, but extremely dangerous.
Title: Re: Which absent villian will appear in Peace Talks?
Post by: Snark Knight on August 28, 2017, 03:23:59 PM
I doubt Cowl, as he's due to show up in Mirror Mirror per WOJ

I don't think I've seen that one yet? If you happen to remember where it was from, I'd be curious to read his exact wording about the Cowl appearance.
Title: Re: Which absent villian will appear in Peace Talks?
Post by: Rasins on August 29, 2017, 04:21:12 PM
I'd like to suggest an edit to the initial poll.  Cowl AS Cowl.

He may make an appearance, as whomever he really is, and we wouldn't know it.

Someone else I'd like to see are the two who met at Murphys in GS.  The little Wampire that Murphy beat up, and Marcone's man. 
Title: Re: Which absent villian will appear in Peace Talks?
Post by: DonBugen on August 29, 2017, 04:44:07 PM
Quote
I don't think I've seen that one yet? If you happen to remember where it was from, I'd be curious to read his exact wording about the Cowl appearance.
It'll be a little while until I find it, but I'll say first that I'm pretty sure I misquoted this.  I don't believe that Jim technically said that Cowl would appear in this book; just that it would be in this book that we learn Cowl's identity.
Title: Re: Which absent villian will appear in Peace Talks?
Post by: Snark Knight on August 29, 2017, 06:07:31 PM
It'll be a little while until I find it, but I'll say first that I'm pretty sure I misquoted this.  I don't believe that Jim technically said that Cowl would appear in this book; just that it would be in this book that we learn Cowl's identity.

That's actually a little more surprising, personally. I thought he'd hold that mystery over us nearly to the end.

Mind you, at one point before CD came out he had claimed Cowl would be in that one too. So either Cowl acts under a lot of identities, or Jim sometimes changes his mind about what's going to happen when.
Title: Re: Which absent villian will appear in Peace Talks?
Post by: exartiem on August 29, 2017, 07:35:53 PM
Darth Wannabe rolling up as a Fomor Servitor, or even better as the "Semi-immortal shapeshifting guru" that was mentioned as an Independant Signatory.  I'd love it if Darth was something super-powerful that was just trolling Dresden.

I could see this.  We know that the Fomor have been going after minor talents.  We also saw in Murphy's story, that they are impossibly pompous, so Wannabe's personality would fit right in with them.  I could see Wannabe being approached or captured by the Fomor and then selling out to them to get back at Harry.
Title: Re: Which absent villian will appear in Peace Talks?
Post by: kazimmoinuddin on August 29, 2017, 09:24:06 PM
We have seen a couple of demons in the story so far. I wonder if part of their plan, the circle shared the names of demons to encourage their summoning. So imagine if Harry got his hands on this list of names, and summoned them into the well. They might not be worth even minimum security, but it might be worth it. I bet the island has the power to actually kill such lower level entities.
Title: Re: Which absent villian will appear in Peace Talks?
Post by: DonBugen on August 29, 2017, 10:02:21 PM
Oh drat, I'm actually really wrong. It's at this link below, at 1:05:26. Jim says that we won't find out Cowl's identity until book 17 OR 18. So no, there's no guarantee that he'll show in Mirror Mirror. There's only a 50-50 chance that we'll even find out who he is.

https://youtu.be/MDJDn-ggqOo
Title: Re: Which absent villian will appear in Peace Talks?
Post by: wardenferry419 on August 29, 2017, 11:38:43 PM
I'd like to suggest an edit to the initial poll.  Cowl AS Cowl.

He may make an appearance, as whomever he really is, and we wouldn't know it.

Someone else I'd like to see are the two who met at Murphys in GS.  The little Wampire that Murphy beat up, and Marcone's man.

Since Cowl's ID is unknown that is how I was going with it. I guess I would like to see Hendricks and Gard. Though, I don't classify them as villians.
Title: Re: Which absent villian will appear in Peace Talks?
Post by: KurtinStGeorge on August 29, 2017, 11:49:34 PM
That's actually a little more surprising, personally. I thought he'd hold that mystery over us nearly to the end.

Mind you, at one point before CD came out he had claimed Cowl would be in that one too. So either Cowl acts under a lot of identities, or Jim sometimes changes his mind about what's going to happen when.

Jim has occasionally given out information that turned out to be false or premature.  Right after Cold Days came out I read an interview Jim did; which unfortunately I can longer find, in which he described a rather funny conversation Harry would have with Michael; which Michael wouldn't find funny, about Molly being the Winter Lady.  Harry would tell Michael that he would have to cut Molly some slack when he saw Molly wearing a very tight fitting and suggestive outfit because she was now the Queen of slutty faeries. Apparently Molly would be dressing to fit the image.  This would strain Harry and Michael's relationship and we could look forward to learning more about this complication in the next book. 

Of course the next book was Skin Game from which Molly was absent until the very end of the story and she didn't do anything public that could draw her parents attention.  Perhaps we will see such a scene in Peace Talks or perhaps Jim was just having some fun with the interviewer.  We'll have to wait and see.
Title: Re: Which absent villian will appear in Peace Talks?
Post by: KurtinStGeorge on August 30, 2017, 12:25:26 AM
The thing about Cowl that I find underwhelming is we haven't seen Harry particularly interested in Cowl's actual identity and it's never been suggested that Cowl could be someone Harry knows.  My guess is Cowl is Simon Pietrovich. 

   
Title: Re: Which absent villian will appear in Peace Talks?
Post by: LordDresden2 on August 30, 2017, 02:44:37 AM
Jim has occasionally given out information that turned out to be false or premature. 

Even the author doesn't always know for sure what's coming up later.  Details change, the story works better if you change 'x', or 'y' sounded good when you first think of it but turned out to be a turkey when it's on the page, etc.  Or the author expects A but when he thinks through the implications of what has gone before, he realizes that A no longer makes sense, and swtiches to C.

Also, I rate the 'canonicity' of a writer's comments based on the circumstances.  For ex, everything else being equal, I would rate a comment from JB on the board here as more 'likely' to bear out over time than a verbal statement in answer to a question at a gathering.  Why?  Because when you type a post you think about it more as you write, while a verbal comment may be more likely to be 'off the cuff', and JB (or anyone else) might think half an hour later: "Hey, I just realized I said something back there that implies 'x' and 'x' isn't so."

Quote



Right after Cold Days came out I read an interview Jim did; which unfortunately I can longer find, in which he described a rather funny conversation Harry would have with Michael; which Michael wouldn't find funny, about Molly being the Winter Lady.  Harry would tell Michael that he would have to cut Molly some slack when he saw Molly wearing a very tight fitting and suggestive outfit because she was now the Queen of slutty faeries. Apparently Molly would be dressing to fit the image.  This would strain Harry and Michael's relationship and we could look forward to learning more about this complication in the next book. 

I could live without that happening, honestly.

Title: Re: Which absent villian will appear in Peace Talks?
Post by: LordDresden2 on August 30, 2017, 02:50:10 AM

Quote
They're enemies...but also frenemies, sorta.  I think Harry wants to hate her, but can't quite, she'd like to corrupt him, but is glad when he refuses.  It's a mess.

Sounds like the beginning of a totally dysfunctional romance.

Yeah, it does, doesn't it?  For what it's worth, I think Harry and Lara are attracted to each other simply as man and woman, which of course they are.  The trouble, of course, is that they aren't just that.  Harry is a Wizard of the White Council, a Warden, THE Warden, and a hero in spite of himself.  Lara is a monster who eats people, as well as being a calculating political killer and a ruthless manipulator and seriously twisted, even allowing for being a White Vampire.

They're natural enemies...but alike enough to be attracted.  They're both born snarkers, they both are way above average intelligence, both are 'damaged' in ways that overlap.  It would be hard for the human Lara and the human Harry not to be attracted.  But they're still enemies, too.

Title: Re: Which absent villian will appear in Peace Talks?
Post by: LordDresden2 on August 30, 2017, 02:53:01 AM
Harry and Lara are mutually blackmailing each other into a peaceful stalemate.  Pretty sure that both see the other as potentially useful, but extremely dangerous.

Absolutely.  Though I suspect the stalemate may be ending.  More and more people know that Lara is the real White Queen.  Either Lord Raith is going to break her control and become dangerous on his own again at some point, or the pretense will cease to be useful for Lara.  What happens then depends on what happens then.
Title: Re: Which absent villian will appear in Peace Talks?
Post by: wardenferry419 on August 30, 2017, 12:00:56 PM
Lara knows that Harry is no longer love-protected and can be whammied. That could make their next encounter very interesting.
Title: Re: Which absent villian will appear in Peace Talks?
Post by: Snark Knight on August 30, 2017, 01:31:40 PM
Lara knows that Harry is no longer love-protected and can be whammied. That could make their next encounter very interesting.

Have you read Jury Duty?
(click to show/hide)

Also, it's possible Harry and Karrin might already be well on the way to serious enough in their feelings for each other to protect against White Court interference anyway. They've covered willingness to sacrifice themselves for the other dozens of times over, and the romantic angle has been building for a while.
Title: Re: Which absent villian will appear in Peace Talks?
Post by: wardenferry419 on August 30, 2017, 01:48:55 PM
It has been awhile since I read Jury Duty. I expect Lara to be stronger than standard WCV and she has more intimate knowledge of Harry's mind. But, you may be right on mantle and Murphy coverage.
Title: Re: Which absent villian will appear in Peace Talks?
Post by: Rasins on September 01, 2017, 03:27:10 PM
Oh, I hope the Harry / Karrin thing doesn't protect Harry.  Not because I don't want them both to be happy but because it's been kind of stressed in the books that True Love is extremely rare, and Harry has already experienced it.  Further, I think Karrin isn't really capable of it any more.  She can love Harry, but for it to be THAT form, I don't think it'll happen. 
Title: Re: Which absent villian will appear in Peace Talks?
Post by: wardenferry419 on September 02, 2017, 12:02:57 AM
Maybe it is just my jaded side but I would say that true love happens more readily with the young. Experience tends to complicate simplicity.
Title: Re: Which absent villian will appear in Peace Talks?
Post by: Rasins on September 02, 2017, 02:10:40 AM
Maybe it is just my jaded side but I would say that true love happens more readily with the young. Experience tends to complicate simplicity.

Agreed.

I know it's a dumb thing to say, but I watched the show "Sabrina" for several episodes, and one of them had "True Love" as the only cure. 

Of course it was between two 16 year olds, and one of the aunt/witches said, "It's always true love at that age."
Title: Re: Which absent villian will appear in Peace Talks?
Post by: LordDresden2 on September 02, 2017, 05:38:22 AM
Oh, I hope the Harry / Karrin thing doesn't protect Harry.  Not because I don't want them both to be happy but because it's been kind of stressed in the books that True Love is extremely rare, and Harry has already experienced it.  Further, I think Karrin isn't really capable of it any more.  She can love Harry, but for it to be THAT form, I don't think it'll happen.

True Love isn't all that rare.  Many people experience it more than once in their lives.

What the books stress is that 'romantic love', the fantasy peddled by Hollywood, romance novels, the advertising industry, etc. is not the real thing (which is true).  Many married couples come to genuinely love each other, but this happens after they marry at least as often as before, as the real thing grows and replaces infatuation.

I don't doubt that Harry and Karrin could protect each other...or could have at one time.  Like you, I'm not so sure they still could.
Title: Re: Which absent villian will appear in Peace Talks?
Post by: LordDresden2 on September 02, 2017, 05:41:54 AM
Maybe it is just my jaded side but I would say that true love happens more readily with the young. Experience tends to complicate simplicity.

Actually, I would say the opposite.

The real thing requires some knowledge of who the other person really is.  Some experience of that person.  I would say you'll find the real thing far more often among old married couples who have been together for 30 years than 22 year old newlyweds who can't keep their hands off each other.

What young people 'feel' is usually not the real thing.  The real thing is not even exactly a feeling.  It's rarely passionate, though it can be.  It's more about what you give than what you get.  It can require that you give up the other person just readily as it can keep you together.  Often it's something that is as much about treasuring the other person's flaws as their virtues.

It's got nothing at all to do with what Madison Avenue peddles.

Title: Re: Which absent villian will appear in Peace Talks?
Post by: LordDresden2 on September 02, 2017, 05:47:06 AM
Agreed.

I know it's a dumb thing to say, but I watched the show "Sabrina" for several episodes, and one of them had "True Love" as the only cure. 

Of course it was between two 16 year olds, and one of the aunt/witches said, "It's always true love at that age."

And that's exactly where the show got it wrong.

What 16 year olds feel is very rarely genuine Love.  It's more often self-focused, all about feelings and emotions and no little bit of physical lust.  All of which can certainly coexist with the Love, but are not really of it.  At least as often as not, what 16 year olds feel is for a fantasy of who the other person is rather than the reality.

Exceptions exist.  I'm pretty sure Harry genuinely Loved Elaine when they were teens (can't be as sure about her, we don't know her POV on the matter).  He was ready to fight Justin for her, after all, which is the next thing to suicide for a 16 year old apprentice Wizard.

Molly thought she was in Love with Harry as a teen, but she was not.  She might really be, now.

Title: Re: Which absent villian will appear in Peace Talks?
Post by: Rasins on September 05, 2017, 05:22:50 PM
And that's exactly where the show got it wrong.

What 16 year olds feel is very rarely genuine Love.  It's more often self-focused, all about feelings and emotions and no little bit of physical lust.  All of which can certainly coexist with the Love, but are not really of it.  At least as often as not, what 16 year olds feel is for a fantasy of who the other person is rather than the reality.

Exceptions exist.  I'm pretty sure Harry genuinely Loved Elaine when they were teens (can't be as sure about her, we don't know her POV on the matter).  He was ready to fight Justin for her, after all, which is the next thing to suicide for a 16 year old apprentice Wizard.

Molly thought she was in Love with Harry as a teen, but she was not.  She might really be, now.

I really do understand what you are saying.

That being said, I believe that the 16-year old love IS true.  It may not be mature, but it is true.  Yes it is at times wrapped up with a bit of hormones and selfishness, but it's also very strongly felt and THEY think it's true.

A lot of magic is dependent upon belief.  No real reason this couldn't work based on belief as well.
Title: Re: Which absent villian will appear in Peace Talks?
Post by: Snark Knight on September 05, 2017, 06:34:56 PM
Oh, I hope the Harry / Karrin thing doesn't protect Harry.  Not because I don't want them both to be happy but because it's been kind of stressed in the books that True Love is extremely rare, and Harry has already experienced it.  Further, I think Karrin isn't really capable of it any more.  She can love Harry, but for it to be THAT form, I don't think it'll happen.

Nicodemus pushed her buttons pretty effectively by threatening Harry.
Title: Re: Which absent villian will appear in Peace Talks?
Post by: wardenferry419 on September 06, 2017, 01:26:45 PM
Let's not carry the Murphy and the broken sword debate here please. On a lighter note, are there any other villians whose return would make Harry's day alot worse?
Title: Re: Which absent villian will appear in Peace Talks?
Post by: DonBugen on September 06, 2017, 01:50:02 PM
Honestly?  I feel like Peace Talks is where we'll see Arthur Langtry return as a villain and pull his best play yet.  And I mention him as a long-absent villain specifically because it's been a while since he's really acted as a villain; not since Proven Guilty.  He's been a reluctant ally in Proven Guilty, and in Changes we saw him at least with his guns pointed away from Harry and toward the right enemy.  But I don't think that he would be thrilled at all with Resurrected, Fae-influenced, authority-snubbing Dresden.  If the Merlin ever wants Dresden to be off the White Council and comfortably six feet under, this is the time to do it.  And Jim's already stated that to the Council, the threat level really doesn't go any higher than where Harry's at right now.
Title: Re: Which absent villian will appear in Peace Talks?
Post by: Mr. Death on September 06, 2017, 02:04:53 PM
See, I've always had the opposite read of Langtry. I think he's there to look like an obfuscating, stubborn authority figure for Harry to rail against -- helped by the fact that in the earlier bits of the series, he genuinely is -- but for Harry to eventually find an ally in.

Harry's come a long way since he first met Langtry, and I think between Turn Coat and Changes, they understand each other a little more. Granted, this is complicated by the outright hostility of their last encounter, but the Merlin has to see the power and influence that Harry is gaining over the White Council.

I'm not sure Langtry can afford to get rid of Dresden; he has Ebenezer and the Gatekeeper as clear allies, and he's friendly with Martha Liberty and Listens to Wind. He's in with the leadership of the Wardens and could be considered a war hero. He's also a symbol to the younger set among the Council who, thanks to the War, are up and coming faster than Langtry probably likes.

And that's not even mentioning the connection with Winter.

While it's certainly true that Langtry doesn't like Dresden, and is wary of what he might become, I think Langtry may well be willing to play ball with him and make him an ally, if only to "keep his enemies close" and to make use of Harry's influence. You'd have to weigh what Langtry stands to gain by getting rid of Dresden versus what he stands to gain by making him an ally. As things stand, I think Langtry would see more benefit with the latter.

Their interactions in Turn Coat are pretty instructive, I think -- Langtry sure as hell doesn't like Dresden there, but he recognizes his talents and abilities and moves to use them the best he can. And at the trial, he not only catches on to Dresden's plan well enough to add his own theatrical spin, but when shit hits fan, it's Dresden specifically that he tasks with apprehending Peabody.

Of course, I give it 50-50 Harry throws any attempt by Langtry to ally with him back in his face and pisses him off anyway, but I suppose we'll see.
Title: Re: Which absent villian will appear in Peace Talks?
Post by: DonBugen on September 06, 2017, 03:09:50 PM
Mold demons.

Mark my words, more mold demons.
Title: Re: Which absent villian will appear in Peace Talks?
Post by: Kindler on September 06, 2017, 04:02:45 PM
Rudolph will return, trying to kill Harry and Murphy after the events of Changes ruined his life and he barely skated on corruption charges. His criminal defense was funded by Larry Fowler, who will also appear, leading a mass media campaign for Harry's arrest, pending charges of domestic terrorism.

Title: Re: Which absent villian will appear in Peace Talks?
Post by: wardenferry419 on September 06, 2017, 11:49:45 PM
Rudolph annoyed the crap out of me. I hope the next time we see him is in a padded cell with a straitjacket. As far as Langtry goes, I see him as a reluctant supporter of Harry due to Harry's actions in Changes and his ties to Mab.
Title: Re: Which absent villian will appear in Peace Talks?
Post by: Kindler on September 07, 2017, 01:38:54 PM
Rudolph annoyed the crap out of me. I hope the next time we see him is in a padded cell with a straitjacket. As far as Langtry goes, I see him as a reluctant supporter of Harry due to Harry's actions in Changes and his ties to Mab.

Oh yeah, me too. I was mostly joking, though I do think Rudolph might show up. It was only a minor consolation that Rudolph got screwed over every time he showed up. I still don't get what was behind his extreme character derailment after Fool Moon. He was too stupid for it to be Nemesis, at least directly.

I'm with you on Langtry. I don't see him as directly antagonistic toward Harry. In my opinion, his actions are motivated by The Greater Good. He was trying to avoid a war, and trading one wizard's life is worth it—I couldn't say that I wouldn't try to do the same in his position. It's also worth noting that we haven't really seen him much since Peabody's ink has left his system. The one time we did, he was far, FAR more ready to throw down with the Reds than he had been, and might have been willing to support Harry's attack if the White Council wasn't crippled by Cristos later on.

He'll probably still be pissed at Harry for creating such a huge power vacuum after Changes, and he'll likely be annoyed that Harry is beyond his reach now that he's the Winter Knight. If he also knows that he's the Warden, I think he'll have a minor heart attack, just at the thought of so much power being in one person's hands.

To be honest, the highlight for me won't be returning villains, it'll be seeing most (if not all) of the people we haven't for several books.
Title: Re: Which absent villian will appear in Peace Talks?
Post by: Snark Knight on September 07, 2017, 08:48:52 PM
He'll probably still be pissed at Harry for creating such a huge power vacuum after Changes, and he'll likely be annoyed that Harry is beyond his reach now that he's the Winter Knight. If he also knows that he's the Warden, I think he'll have a minor heart attack, just at the thought of so much power being in one person's hands.

He knows. Ebenezar's journal entry at the end of TC mentioned the Merlin wanting to put Harry under surveillance, whereas Eb thinks Harry is one of the few he would trust with "that mantle".

As for the power vaccuum, I'm sure he's not happy about it, but it's not like he can really pin much blame on Harry when he outright told him the goal was to exterminate the Reds. Well, mission accomplished.
Title: Re: Which absent villian will appear in Peace Talks?
Post by: RobReece on September 07, 2017, 09:22:09 PM
I really do understand what you are saying.

That being said, I believe that the 16-year old love IS true.  It may not be mature, but it is true.  Yes it is at times wrapped up with a bit of hormones and selfishness, but it's also very strongly felt and THEY think it's true.

A lot of magic is dependent upon belief.  No real reason this couldn't work based on belief as well.

Magic has a lot to do with emotions, and I think that young love is similarly wrapped up in emotions and passion along with the hormones.  And a lot of the time, the young are in love with the 'idea' of being in love.  But I think that True Love is deeper than just the emotions and the passion.  There's no doubt that Harry and Karrin love each other, their willingness to kill or be killed for the other shows that quite readily, the question should be whether or not their love has evolved into a romantic, 'committed' love that would protect them from the WCV's.  Personally, based on the end of SG, I'd say yes.
Title: Re: Which absent villian will appear in Peace Talks?
Post by: forumghost on September 08, 2017, 01:05:49 AM
He knows. Ebenezar's journal entry at the end of TC mentioned the Merlin wanting to put Harry under surveillance, whereas Eb thinks Harry is one of the few he would trust with "that mantle".

As for the power vaccuum, I'm sure he's not happy about it, but it's not like he can really pin much blame on Harry when he outright told him the goal was to exterminate the Reds. Well, mission accomplished.

I dunno, I reckon you'd be surprised by exactly how much people can blame Harry for.
Title: Re: Which absent villian will appear in Peace Talks?
Post by: wardenferry419 on September 08, 2017, 09:57:39 AM
Harry really does not need others blaming him for stuff; he does enough of that on his own.
Title: Re: Which absent villian will appear in Peace Talks?
Post by: namkcas on September 08, 2017, 03:43:50 PM
Going through each candidate listed:

1 - Cowl/Kumori under their Black Council roles are not members of the Accords.  As this looks to be held under the Accords, they have no seat at the table.

2 - The Raiths are not really absent.  They had a role in Cold Days, though Thomas was the only member "on screen".  Lara specifically participated.  Lord Raith is unlikely to travel to a meeting when Lara can represent him.

3 - Mavra is a possibility, but I don't see her gain in being in a place where lots of folks would want her eliminated.

4 - The Eebs have 2 problems.  First, they may not be alive.  If the Blood Curse did not get them, the Erlking's folk might have.  Second, it assumes that they are well and released by the Erlking.  Given that they violated his territory (and their Guest Rite) and his stated use for them was to entertain his followers, not sure why they would let them go if they are alive.
Title: Re: Which absent villian will appear in Peace Talks?
Post by: Rasins on September 08, 2017, 04:04:29 PM
I'm ambivalent on the subject of the Ebs.  If they do still exist, I hope there is a good (Doyalistic) reason for it.
Title: Re: Which absent villian will appear in Peace Talks?
Post by: DonBugen on September 08, 2017, 06:17:48 PM
Slightly off-topic, but if Vince Graver is ever going to show his face again, this would be the book to do it.  What better time to use a smart vanilla mortal PI than when there's a bunch of supernatural maniacs around which you need to spy on, that would see him as nothing more than background noise?  Besides, Harry can kind of afford to hire him for a few days now.
Title: Re: Which absent villian will appear in Peace Talks?
Post by: Griffyn612 on September 08, 2017, 06:26:28 PM
not sure why they would let them go if they are alive.
I'm ambivalent on the subject of the Ebs.  If they do still exist, I hope there is a good (Doyalistic) reason for it.
Two good reasons they left, assuming they survived the curse.
1) The Erlking didn't want to exterminate a hunter species, no matter how worthless the Eebs might have been.
2) A Nemesis agent in the Erlking's Court secretly expedited their release as potential allies to the cause.
Title: Re: Which absent villian will appear in Peace Talks?
Post by: kazimmoinuddin on September 08, 2017, 06:37:03 PM
I remember a story with the fae, a human travelled to their lands and never aged there, but when he returned to the mortal realm, he super aged. So the Eebs were restored to humanity, but somehow simply did not age in the lands of faerie. They would need some kind of patron to alter them to allow them to survive in the mortal realm once more.
Title: Re: Which absent villian will appear in Peace Talks?
Post by: forumghost on September 08, 2017, 08:25:38 PM
I'm ambivalent on the subject of the Ebs.  If they do still exist, I hope there is a good (Doyalistic) reason for it.

Two good reasons they left, assuming they survived the curse.
1) The Erlking didn't want to exterminate a hunter species, no matter how worthless the Eebs might have been.
2) A Nemesis agent in the Erlking's Court secretly expedited their release as potential allies to the cause.

Why would Nemesis waste it's time and effort (not to mention the identity of its agents) to spring a couple of loser Rampires?

What made the Red Court a threat was their numbers, influence, and organization. None of which the Eebs have.
Title: Re: Which absent villian will appear in Peace Talks?
Post by: Griffyn612 on September 08, 2017, 09:42:50 PM
Why would Nemesis waste it's time and effort (not to mention the identity of its agents) to spring a couple of loser Rampires?

What made the Red Court a threat was their numbers, influence, and organization. None of which the Eebs have.
Theoretically, all it would take is the primary agent using an ignorant resource to free them, and then have another ignorant resource eliminate the "traitor" before questioning. 

As to why make the effort, the Ramps were a formidable asset that can be quickly rebuilt.  If the Eebs were freed (one way or another) right after the curse, then by the time of Peace Talks, they will have had a couple years to add to their numbers.

With the chaos of the Fomor/Council war, the Eebs could have taken plenty of people to turn.  They might have been able to hold on to some of the old resources of the Court, in remote areas that don't get as much attention.

And if they joined forces with the Fomor, as other disenfranchised groups have, then they would have access to some of the Court's old resources that the Fomor seized, and would have the ability to work in the shadows of their organization to rebuild.

By the time the Peace Talks begin, they could have hundreds, even thousands, of Ramps ready to raid the talks along with the Fomor to surprise the attendees and enact revenge for their demise.  Ramps made from werewolves and minor talents and everyone else the Fomor have been kidnapping. 
Title: Re: Which absent villian will appear in Peace Talks?
Post by: Mr. Death on September 08, 2017, 11:11:18 PM
That's presuming they could make new vampires.

Bianca couldn't until she was promoted to the higher ranks of nobility. There's nobody around to promote the Eebs, so if they weren't already...
Title: Re: Which absent villian will appear in Peace Talks?
Post by: Griffyn612 on September 09, 2017, 12:26:07 AM
That's presuming they could make new vampires.

Bianca couldn't until she was promoted to the higher ranks of nobility. There's nobody around to promote the Eebs, so if they weren't already...
We don't know the methodology of their transformation.  It might be that she physically could, but to do so without permission is a death sentence.

Or it could be that the power of the Court was spread, like Vadderung said, and the most senior could do it.  Being the only survivors, the Eebs and their squad would be the most senior.

Or, they might not be able to, in which case there wouldn't be much point in bringing them back.  That's up to JB.
Title: Re: Which absent villian will appear in Peace Talks?
Post by: forumghost on September 09, 2017, 12:37:09 AM
If they come back, what was the point in Changes in the first place?

'lol Harry you sold your soul, traumatised several people you care about, killed the mother of your child and screwed over most of the world by shattering the power balance for nothing because the Red Court is back at full power, trolololol'

Even Jim doesn't hate Harry that much.
Title: Re: Which absent villian will appear in Peace Talks?
Post by: Griffyn612 on September 09, 2017, 01:08:23 AM
If they come back, what was the point in Changes in the first place?

'lol Harry you sold your soul, traumatised several people you care about, killed the mother of your child and screwed over most of the world by shattering the power balance for nothing because the Red Court is back at full power, trolololol'

Even Jim doesn't hate Harry that much.
I don't think the Ramps, if they do survive the Eebs or anyone else, will ever be what they were.  None of the other factions will let that happen.  Harry destroyed one of the most powerful courts in the supernatural community.

That's a big deal, even if he didn't exterminate them completely.

As for why should JB bring them back... closure for Harry?  It was the Eebs that destroyed Harry's life and forced his hand into accepting Mab's offer.  He hated the Ramps, and he has even more reason to hate the Eebs. 

Having them show up in Peace Talks in a fashion that doesn't allow Harry (and his impulsive mantle) to enact immediate revenge is a good character plot.

Not to mention the old plot theory that a death causes chaos at the Peace Talks, and Harry having to investigate while he himself is a suspect because one of the Eebs was killed would be an excellent "case" for him to work.
Title: Re: Which absent villian will appear in Peace Talks?
Post by: Mr. Death on September 09, 2017, 01:38:56 AM
He got closure with them when he beat their champions in a duel, saw them being carted off for torture at the hands of goblins, and then wiped out everyone they had ever known.

They were a couple also-ran mooks, like the tennis twins in Grave Peril; they were a speedbump in a larger conflict and he drove over them already. Let them stay buried, I say.

Per the RPG, from Bob:

Quote
Bianca’s promotion
to the nobility was
both a legal one
and a metaphysical
one—that’s why
Duke Ortega was
there: to let her
taste of his blood,
giving her the
power and the
authority to make
new spawn.
Title: Re: Which absent villian will appear in Peace Talks?
Post by: Griffyn612 on September 09, 2017, 02:06:52 AM
He got closure with them when he beat their champions in a duel, saw them being carted off for torture at the hands of goblins, and then wiped out everyone they had ever known.

They were a couple also-ran mooks, like the tennis twins in Grave Peril; they were a speedbump in a larger conflict and he drove over them already. Let them stay buried, I say.
You're comparing the Eebs to the Hamilton twins?   ???

The Eebs destroyed Harry's office, and all his belongings there.  They destroyed the Blue Beetle.  They destroyed his apartment, and all of his belongings.  They broke his back, forcing him to take up Mab's offer.  They put him on the FBI's radar.  They used a pawn to cost Murphy her job, thus ruining the life of the woman he loves. It wouldn't surprise me if they were involved in Maggie's capture, which would be a great reveal in a future appearance to stoke Harry's rage.

In comparison, the Hamiltons did what?

To date, the Eebs and Mavra are the only enemies to to successfully attack Harry directly. 

Quote
Per the RPG, from Bob:
That fits with what Vadderung said about the power of the Ramps being diluted.  But with all the others dead, the power of the blood went... where?  Nowhere?  Or to the last of the bloodline?  "Metaphysical" is not the same as physical, so the blood itself might not be required to "ascend" to that level within the Court.
Title: Re: Which absent villian will appear in Peace Talks?
Post by: Mr. Death on September 09, 2017, 02:19:36 AM
I'm not talking about their accomplishments, I'm talking about their overall role in the story.

The Hamiltons weren't the important badguys, Bianca was.

The Eebs weren't the important badguys, Arianna was.

Did they get more done then the Hamiltons? Sure. But Harry has dealt with them, directly and on the page, and their narrative role was finished. At this point Harry probably doesn't even remember them specifically.

Who knows where the power of the blood went, if it went anywhere. It could've dissipated into the ether for all anyone knows. But ask yourself this -- if being in the Nevernever was enough to keep the curse targeting them specifically from hitting, then wouldn't it also prevent the power from finding them?
Title: Re: Which absent villian will appear in Peace Talks?
Post by: Griffyn612 on September 09, 2017, 03:31:43 AM
I'm not talking about their accomplishments, I'm talking about their overall role in the story.

The Hamiltons weren't the important badguys, Bianca was.

The Eebs weren't the important badguys, Arianna was.

Did they get more done then the Hamiltons? Sure. But Harry has dealt with them, directly and on the page, and their narrative role was finished. At this point Harry probably doesn't even remember them specifically.

Who knows where the power of the blood went, if it went anywhere. It could've dissipated into the ether for all anyone knows. But ask yourself this -- if being in the Nevernever was enough to keep the curse targeting them specifically from hitting, then wouldn't it also prevent the power from finding them?
By that logic, the Eebs are the plot equivalent of the Loup Garou, the Nightmare, Corpsetaker (pt. 1), the Naagloshi, and Before.  One has already made a second appearance, and the other two are highly likely to return.  How is the Eebs return less deserving?

As for the power reaching them when the curse couldn't, I would imagine it'd depend on the source of the power.  I could see where it might not reach them until after their release. 

It's been shown that power (magic) exists even when the person trying to tap it (Harry) can't due to being cut off from it via barriers (Hellfire circle), but access was restored once beyond the barrier. 

The Ramp bloodline power could just exist in the pool of magical power, and would fade or transform given enough time.  But if conduits were to appear... ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Not that I'm saying the Eebs will get the Court's combined power.  That's probably gone.  But the aspect to create more of them might not be diluted anymore.
Title: Re: Which absent villian will appear in Peace Talks?
Post by: kazimmoinuddin on September 09, 2017, 09:16:54 PM
They might not be able to restore the rcv, but I could see an effort to some how reclaim their lost power. As former rcv, the Eebs could have a claim to it. The same could be said for Maggie, she was the child of a Demi rcv. How many people have such a blood connection.

I kinda wondered if the warden or winter knight some how claimed that power, in the act of killing the rcv. The winter knight could be seen as a representative of the winter court.
Title: Re: Which absent villian will appear in Peace Talks?
Post by: DonBugen on September 10, 2017, 12:33:26 AM
Probably not, unless somehow Dresden had done it upon Mab's stone alter.  That would be interesting.
Title: Re: Which absent villian will appear in Peace Talks?
Post by: Griffyn612 on September 10, 2017, 02:06:54 AM
I don't think that would go well.  I'm a strong believer in "you are what you eat" in the Dresdenverse.  And I believe the Sidhe are so restricted because of how they got their power (they got the weaknesses and restrictions of what they absorbed along with the benefits)

Eating the Ramps power would be... potentially bad.
Title: Re: Which absent villian will appear in Peace Talks?
Post by: Mr. Death on September 11, 2017, 12:19:47 AM
By that logic, the Eebs are the plot equivalent of the Loup Garou, the Nightmare, Corpsetaker (pt. 1), the Naagloshi, and Before.  One has already made a second appearance, and the other two are highly likely to return.  How is the Eebs return less deserving?
Nah, I'd rank them lower than that. They were dealt with, Harry beat them... I think their role in the story is done. They were not, in themselves, powerful. They were working under orders and when push came to shove, they literally sent a random mook they grabbed out of their squad rather than face Harry directly.

Quote
As for the power reaching them when the curse couldn't, I would imagine it'd depend on the source of the power.  I could see where it might not reach them until after their release. 

It's been shown that power (magic) exists even when the person trying to tap it (Harry) can't due to being cut off from it via barriers (Hellfire circle), but access was restored once beyond the barrier.

The Ramp bloodline power could just exist in the pool of magical power, and would fade or transform given enough time.  But if conduits were to appear... ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Not that I'm saying the Eebs will get the Court's combined power.  That's probably gone.  But the aspect to create more of them might not be diluted anymore.
See, with all the focus on the blood, I think there's a necessarily, inextricably physical component to the Red Court's power. The power seems to be in the blood itself, rather than as energy.

The way I look at it, Odin is specific that their blood has been diluted. Bianca being elevated apparently involved drinking Ortega's blood. They constantly talk about blood as if it, in itself, is what's important.

So I think their power bled out when they did.
Title: Re: Which absent villian will appear in Peace Talks?
Post by: forumghost on September 11, 2017, 07:22:37 AM
Nah, I'd rank them lower than that. They were dealt with, Harry beat them... I think their role in the story is done. They were not, in themselves, powerful. They were working under orders and when push came to shove, they literally sent a random mook they grabbed out of their squad rather than face Harry directly.

Yeah, anyone that thinks the Eeb's are a real threat have clearly forgotten that the first time one of them saw Harry coming they began running as fast as he could in the opposite direction, blubbering in terror, only appearing to confront him when he appeared to be alone and half dead, and then ran away again as soon as the felt his allies coming.

They're only dangerous when they have a bunch of allies to kill-steal off (Sorry Esmerelda, but not being of the first Maya has nothing to do with why you don't get promoted. It's because you're scrublords)
Title: Re: Which absent villian will appear in Peace Talks?
Post by: wardenferry419 on September 11, 2017, 09:29:49 AM
I would rank the Eebs somewhere between Madrigal Raith and Vittorio Malvora. They were so effective in Changes due to Harry having more pressing concerns.
Title: Re: Which absent villian will appear in Peace Talks?
Post by: Mr. Death on September 11, 2017, 11:14:00 AM
Plus, all that stuff about ruining his life was kinda ... incidental. They were just trying to kill him to get him out of the way, not making it personal. Yes, they burned down his house, but not like, "I'll destroy everything you have to make you suffer!" but just as collateral damage for that method of killing him.

The bomb in his office was set by Arianna years before the book, not by the Eebs.

The one "personal" thing (wrecking his car) was done by the Ick.
Title: Re: Which absent villian will appear in Peace Talks?
Post by: forumghost on September 11, 2017, 12:33:00 PM
And his apartment was only burnt down because he turned off the Wards so that he wouldn't kill the corrupt cops that were trying to frame him.

The Eebs were a bunch of Opportunistic Scrubs, in every case either other people/minions did 99% of the work- and none of them achieved the aim of killing Harry.

And when the time came for them to get their own hands dirty, they punked out- Esteban saw Harry and ran away like a little girl. Esmerelda sensed Mouse coming and they scarpered. Harry was lying unconscious with a broken back and they send some small-time thug after him. The Erlking gave them a chance to fight Harry and Susan on terms that frankly favoured them more then their opponents, and the wussed out and sent their minions to fight in their place.

As far as villains go, they aren't exactly batting a thousand.
Title: Re: Which absent villian will appear in Peace Talks?
Post by: Griffyn612 on September 11, 2017, 03:44:02 PM
I never realized losing every last material possession and selling one's soul meant absolutely nothing to so many people.   ???

Seriously, I'm not saying that the Eebs are going to be standing side by side in the miasma of dark energy as Cthulhu rises from the depths, bound to their service as they take over the world.  All I'm saying is that they've done more to hurt Harry than any other villain short of DuMorne (psychologically) and Mavra (physically).

I think that their sudden and unexpected appearance at the Peace Talks, in a situation where Harry can't crush them like bugs due to protocol, will be good plot fodder.  Hell, I'm even saying one should die early in the book to frame Harry for murder, and the other can die by the end. 
Title: Re: Which absent villian will appear in Peace Talks?
Post by: Mr. Death on September 11, 2017, 04:13:10 PM
I never realized losing every last material possession and selling one's soul meant absolutely nothing to so many people.   ???

Seriously, I'm not saying that the Eebs are going to be standing side by side in the miasma of dark energy as Cthulhu rises from the depths, bound to their service as they take over the world.  All I'm saying is that they've done more to hurt Harry than any other villain short of DuMorne (psychologically) and Mavra (physically).
The thing is, they basically did those by accident, and they weren't even doing it for personal reasons -- they were ordered to. They really had no more beef against Dresden than the average Red Court vampire did.

Harry seems to put the blame on Arianna and the Red Court as a whole for all that, not the Eebs specifically, and from the sound of it, he considers the account settled.

Quote
I think that their sudden and unexpected appearance at the Peace Talks, in a situation where Harry can't crush them like bugs due to protocol, will be good plot fodder.  Hell, I'm even saying one should die early in the book to frame Harry for murder, and the other can die by the end.
Honestly, putting themselves in front of Harry Dresden in any capacity seems rather foolish. These are two goons whose main feat of on-screen strength was running through a wall to get away from Harry -- and that was before he was the Winter Knight.

If I were the Eebs and I was lucky enough to survive the Changes curse and I was lucky enough to escape the Erlking's torture chambers, I'd pick a quiet spot as far as physically possible from Harry Dresden to very quietly live out the rest of my days.
Title: Re: Which absent villian will appear in Peace Talks?
Post by: Griffyn612 on September 11, 2017, 05:14:45 PM
The thing is, they basically did those by accident, and they weren't even doing it for personal reasons -- they were ordered to. They really had no more beef against Dresden than the average Red Court vampire did.

Harry seems to put the blame on Arianna and the Red Court as a whole for all that, not the Eebs specifically, and from the sound of it, he considers the account settled.
Honestly, putting themselves in front of Harry Dresden in any capacity seems rather foolish. These are two goons whose main feat of on-screen strength was running through a wall to get away from Harry -- and that was before he was the Winter Knight.
We're talking about Winter Knight Harry "I owed Bob so I did his favor before I made new gear to help keep me alive" Dresden.  If the two Ramps that personally took the most from him and put him in the corner he was in, to have to accept Mab's deal, suddenly appear in front of him, I'm guessing he's going to feel like the scales need further balancing.

Quote
If I were the Eebs and I was lucky enough to survive the Changes curse and I was lucky enough to escape the Erlking's torture chambers, I'd pick a quiet spot as far as physically possible from Harry Dresden to very quietly live out the rest of my days.
If they were in charge, sure.  But I don't see them running things.  I see them as pawns for the Fomor, indebted to them and having to do what they ask for now.  If they survived because of Nemesis/Circle ally and are in debt, they won't have a say in it. 

But if they're told to attend the Peace Talks, in order to try and get their claim as the Ramps leaders recognized by the signatories, and that their safety of assured due to Accords rules, the greedy bastards would go. 
Title: Re: Which absent villian will appear in Peace Talks?
Post by: DonBugen on September 11, 2017, 07:54:33 PM
I know this is deviating from the current debate of "if the Eebs were still alive, would it matter?", but I wanted to throw a vote out for Gregori Cristos.  This would be an excellent time to see if he really is Black Council / Nemfected, or just plain stupid.
Title: Re: Which absent villian will appear in Peace Talks?
Post by: kazimmoinuddin on September 12, 2017, 12:47:31 AM
They might not have a choice, their patron might deliberatly send them after Harry due to their previous experiences. Our hero would definitly get a reaction from them especially if they go after his daughter, I wonder if they were the ones who abductee her in the first place.
Title: Re: Which absent villian will appear in Peace Talks?
Post by: Mr. Death on September 12, 2017, 01:08:35 AM
We're talking about Winter Knight Harry "I owed Bob so I did his favor before I made new gear to help keep me alive" Dresden.  If the two Ramps that personally took the most from him and put him in the corner he was in, to have to accept Mab's deal, suddenly appear in front of him, I'm guessing he's going to feel like the scales need further balancing.
I don't doubt that if they showed up, Harry would probably want to kill them, but that kinda applies to any Red Court at this point. But honestly, it's going to be more of a, "They survived? How? ... Huh." than, "I MUST DESTROY YOU RAR."  Arianna was the one behind them. Or the Red King was. Either way, Harry's dealt with the real cause.

It'd be like Harry getting mad at the gun instead of the person who aimed and fired it.

Quote
If they were in charge, sure.  But I don't see them running things.  I see them as pawns for the Fomor, indebted to them and having to do what they ask for now.  If they survived because of Nemesis/Circle ally and are in debt, they won't have a say in it.
I honestly don't see why the Fomor would bother. They don't have any of the resources or backing that they used to, they have little to no standing in the Accords, if they're just going to be expendable fodder, why go to the effort?

What do the Fomor have to gain from them that they'd go to the trouble of getting them out of the Erlking's hold? What benefit do the Eebs bring that's worth potentially exposing your mole in the Erlking's army?
Title: Re: Which absent villian will appear in Peace Talks?
Post by: Griffyn612 on September 12, 2017, 01:48:17 AM
I don't doubt that if they showed up, Harry would probably want to kill them, but that kinda applies to any Red Court at this point. But honestly, it's going to be more of a, "They survived? How? ... Huh." than, "I MUST DESTROY YOU RAR."  Arianna was the one behind them. Or the Red King was. Either way, Harry's dealt with the real cause.

It'd be like Harry getting mad at the gun instead of the person who aimed and fired it.
I honestly don't see why the Fomor would bother. They don't have any of the resources or backing that they used to, they have little to no standing in the Accords, if they're just going to be expendable fodder, why go to the effort?

What do the Fomor have to gain from them that they'd go to the trouble of getting them out of the Erlking's hold? What benefit do the Eebs bring that's worth potentially exposing your mole in the Erlking's army?
The Ramps can reproduce fast, assuming they can still reproduce.  Susan was a physical threat from Night One, and she hadn't even fully turned.

We don't know a lot about the Fomor, but they seem to be interested in having fodder.  Hence their use of magically-enhanced servitors.

An individual Ramp is more of a threat than any of the servitors we've seen so far.  So why wouldn't they want them?

We're talking about a pantheon that called other broken pantheons to their side, to unite under one banner.  The Ramp survivors would fit that perfectly. 

Rapid troop build-up with physical attributes better than the Wamps, and the ability to use the latent power of the victim, turning a wizard into a Ramp wizard.  Or a minor talent ectomancer into a Ramp ectomancer.  Or a werewolf into... a batwolf?

The point is, maybe the Fomor are gathering specials to use as body parts.  But maybe they're also sharing some of their kidnap victims with the Ramps, and creating a small army of empowered berserker shock troops that no-one sees coming.
Title: Re: Which absent villian will appear in Peace Talks?
Post by: groinkick on September 12, 2017, 03:45:01 AM
What about members from the White Court?  I mean if Lord Raith's demise would destabilize everything it would make sense to see some of them wouldn't it?
Title: Re: Which absent villian will appear in Peace Talks?
Post by: wardenferry419 on September 12, 2017, 08:55:45 AM
Is there WOJ that Lord Raith is going to die or is that a rumor/speculation?
Title: Re: Which absent villian will appear in Peace Talks?
Post by: Mr. Death on September 12, 2017, 12:53:57 PM
The Ramps can reproduce fast, assuming they can still reproduce.  Susan was a physical threat from Night One, and she hadn't even fully turned.

We don't know a lot about the Fomor, but they seem to be interested in having fodder.  Hence their use of magically-enhanced servitors.

An individual Ramp is more of a threat than any of the servitors we've seen so far.  So why wouldn't they want them?
First, that's a pretty big assumption. I'm having trouble accepting that something that seemed to require ritual involving physical components can happen anyway essentially by accident. The Red Court have always seemed the most "physical" of the vampire courts, and the literal, physical blood seems to have been necessary to elevate Bianca.

As for them being more powerful... eh, I'm not totally sold on that. They have a few crippling and -- most importantly -- well-known weaknesses that let pre-infection Susan take a few of them out.

Truth is we don't know what all their servitors can do. Having minions that don't have glaring weaknesses or an addiction to blood might be worth the trade-off of power.

Quote
We're talking about a pantheon that called other broken pantheons to their side, to unite under one banner.  The Ramp survivors would fit that perfectly.
If there were more than the two most cowardly examples of the species, I'd agree with you more.

Think of it this way, though. Let's say they show up in Peace Talks on official business. Harry knows where they were last seen. He's on speaking terms with the guy who had them. You don't think he's going to ask? You don't think everyone else -- like the White Council contingent -- is going to notice that the Fomor had been allied with a group that had so recently tried to genocide them?

The Fomor or Nemesis would have to show a few of their holding cards to get them out and keep them out. I don't think it's worth it.
Title: Re: Which absent villian will appear in Peace Talks?
Post by: Kindler on September 12, 2017, 01:10:47 PM
First, that's a pretty big assumption. I'm having trouble accepting that something that seemed to require ritual involving physical components can happen anyway essentially by accident. The Red Court have always seemed the most "physical" of the vampire courts, and the literal, physical blood seems to have been necessary to elevate Bianca.

As for them being more powerful... eh, I'm not totally sold on that. They have a few crippling and -- most importantly -- well-known weaknesses that let pre-infection Susan take a few of them out.

Truth is we don't know what all their servitors can do. Having minions that don't have glaring weaknesses or an addiction to blood might be worth the trade-off of power.
If there were more than the two most cowardly examples of the species, I'd agree with you more.

Think of it this way, though. Let's say they show up in Peace Talks on official business. Harry knows where they were last seen. He's on speaking terms with the guy who had them. You don't think he's going to ask? You don't think everyone else -- like the White Council contingent -- is going to notice that the Fomor had been allied with a group that had so recently tried to genocide them?

The Fomor or Nemesis would have to show a few of their holding cards to get them out and keep them out. I don't think it's worth it.

I mostly agree that the Eebs are dead anyway, but it might be interesting if they show back up with the Fomor as sponsors, which is an angle I didn't consider. What if they're planning to use the peace talks to demand restitution for, you know, genocide? Is there an equivalent of the Geneva Convention and the Hague? If Harry and, by extension, the White Council (and with Winter's support and tacit approval), committed a war crime, there might be an Accords provision that puts him, Mab, and the Merlin in the hot seat. Hell, with Cristos on the Senior Council, things might get real complicated real quick.

Speaking of which, has the full text of the Unseelie Accords been produced? It's one of those things I'd really like to read, considering how often they show up.
Title: Re: Which absent villian will appear in Peace Talks?
Post by: Mr. Death on September 12, 2017, 02:12:59 PM
Mab doesn't seem like the type to write in a provision letting the losers get payback for losing a war they started, with a weapon they created themselves.

Mab, to me, seems much more likely to include language in the Accords to the effect of, "You brought it on yourselves."
Title: Re: Which absent villian will appear in Peace Talks?
Post by: Griffyn612 on September 12, 2017, 03:29:27 PM
First, that's a pretty big assumption.
From a Doylist perspective, there's not much point in bringing the Eebs back unless you're establishing that the Ramps are still going to be around.  Therefore, them surviving and them being able to reproduce are part of the whole. 

Quote
As for them being more powerful... eh, I'm not totally sold on that. They have a few crippling and -- most importantly -- well-known weaknesses that let pre-infection Susan take a few of them out.
It's said in the books that the Wamps are inferior to the other vampires, strength and speed-wise.  As for Susan, I think that's a stretch.  Pre-bite, she used holy water and a gun to likely kill one.  She helped the others keep some at bay.  That's all that said about that. 

Considering that they were obviously trying to take Susan and Justine alive (because they did) it changes the dynamic of the fight.  They weren't going for the kill.

Quote
Truth is we don't know what all their servitors can do. Having minions that don't have glaring weaknesses or an addiction to blood might be worth the trade-off of power.
I'm willing to bet there's some that are more formidable.  But as general shock troops, do you think the ones we saw so far would be better than Ramps?  Short of taking out their blood bladder, Ramps are hard to take out.  The servitors so far fell like chaff.

Quote
If there were more than the two most cowardly examples of the species, I'd agree with you more.
I think your definition of cowardly is odd.  Staying alive to complete your mission is an interesting take on cowardice.

And if Harry hadn't had the get-out-of-paralysis-free card to play, they would have won. He had to sell his proverbial soul to overcome their machinations.

Quote
Think of it this way, though. Let's say they show up in Peace Talks on official business. Harry knows where they were last seen. He's on speaking terms with the guy who had them. You don't think he's going to ask? You don't think everyone else -- like the White Council contingent -- is going to notice that the Fomor had been allied with a group that had so recently tried to genocide them?

The Fomor or Nemesis would have to show a few of their holding cards to get them out and keep them out. I don't think it's worth it.
I already provided two examples of how that could go down.  One is that the Erlking lets them go to preserve a hunter species.  The other is that the traitor has them freed and frames someone else that won't be around to answer questions.  Some minor Lord of the Court is convinced to do it, and is then betrayed by the spy and knocked off. 

Erlking is left with suspicions, but nothing to work with.  And if he wasn't already keeping a suspicious eye on his people, given all the infiltration lately among the Sidhe Courts, he's an idiot.

What if they're planning to use the peace talks to demand restitution for, you know, genocide?
Mab doesn't seem like the type to write in a provision letting the losers get payback for losing a war they started, with a weapon they created themselves.

Mab, to me, seems much more likely to include language in the Accords to the effect of, "You brought it on yourselves."
I concur that restitution is unlikely.  They could arrive as part of the Fomor party, or they could arrive as survivors that are looking to get some minor Accords protection as they re-establish their Court, conceding that they're done with war and revenge.  Until they're not.
Title: Re: Which absent villian will appear in Peace Talks?
Post by: Kindler on September 12, 2017, 05:38:51 PM
Mab doesn't seem like the type to write in a provision letting the losers get payback for losing a war they started, with a weapon they created themselves.

Mab, to me, seems much more likely to include language in the Accords to the effect of, "You brought it on yourselves."

I concur that restitution is unlikely.  They could arrive as part of the Fomor party, or they could arrive as survivors that are looking to get some minor Accords protection as they re-establish their Court, conceding that they're done with war and revenge.  Until they're not.

I was thinking more that the Fomor would use the Eebs, as the only surviving members of the Reds, as political levers. Consider what fining the White Council a weregild for each member of the Red Court Harry killed as a result of the curse would cost. Harry did point out that the economic power of the White Council was one of their most effective weapons. This could bankrupt them, even if Harry doesn't personally have to pay for it. Though it would be kind of funny if he had to immediately lose all of the diamonds he just acquired from Skin Game because of a supernatural legal case.

Does Mab actually get the final say? I think she might, but I think the other signatories' opinions might matter. I'm not really disagreeing, I'm just unsure what the arbitration process is for the Accords. Is there a vote? A jury trial, or an opportunity to one? Is Mab essentially the Supreme Court?

Anyway, my overall idea wasn't that the Eebs would press a claim, but that the Fomor, if they had them smuggled out, might use them as witnesses to level charges at Harry, the White Council, and Winter. Think about all of the Reds that (being monsters aside) were minding their own business in Paris or Athens when their hearts exploded out of their chests. Ditto to all of the half-turned ones who died; the same argument for claiming the ladies of the Ordo and the lesser talents as part of the White Council's legitimate interests (which allowed Harry and Ramirez to challenge the whites to a duel) could be made of them, and they never necessarily committed murder. Countless within the Reds' sphere of influence who had absolutely nothing to do with the bloodline curse were killed because of the assault on Buffalo Chicken Pizza.

Super unlikely, sure, but I'm not a lawyer and I could make those arguments, and sympathizers and appeasers like Cristos could sway opinions enough for it to have a real impact. I think it would actually be pretty interesting if that happened, if for no other reason than the Eebs were pathetic excuses for villains, and their affect on global politics in the supernatural community could be way, way out of proportion with their abilities and actual contributions.
Title: Re: Which absent villian will appear in Peace Talks?
Post by: Mr. Death on September 12, 2017, 06:45:26 PM
Weregild is to avoid further conflict, and avoid starting a war.

The White Council was already at war with the Red Court. They wouldn't pay weregild for any of the enemy combatants killed.

The war's over and the Red Court lost. That's basically the end of it. It doesn't make sense to then have some kind of charges pressed against the White Council for winning it.
Title: Re: Which absent villian will appear in Peace Talks?
Post by: groinkick on September 12, 2017, 07:16:35 PM
Is there WOJ that Lord Raith is going to die or is that a rumor/speculation?

Well I think that the belief is that most in the White Court knows Raith is a puppet now.  Not sure if there is a woj.  Thomas is going to play a big role in the story.  If Lord Raith is going to be killed, or die I think this is probably the book for it.
Title: Re: Which absent villian will appear in Peace Talks?
Post by: Griffyn612 on September 12, 2017, 07:51:50 PM
Or he'll somehow come roaring back into relevance.  Even if Harry doesn't need closure on Lord Raith, Thomas does.  After all, Raith made his life hell, he killed his mother, and he trussed him up as a sacrifice.  There's a showdown owed there.
Title: Re: Which absent villian will appear in Peace Talks?
Post by: kazimmoinuddin on September 12, 2017, 10:20:35 PM
I think there is a theory, that Harry can use his soul fire enhanced magic to truly harm lord Raith. Soul fire has allowed Harry to harm beings that his normal magic can't affect, and has shown proven effectiveness on outsiders, which is where the protections are believed to originate.
 The biggest question is what happens to the death curse Margaret cast. Some believe it would simply disperse, but due to its permanence, I believe more. Even if it disappears, what would the effect on Harry and Thomas if they no longer power a curse.
Title: Re: Which absent villian will appear in Peace Talks?
Post by: dspringer1 on September 12, 2017, 11:43:57 PM
Some more obscure villains for you or a come back from the dead scenario where we did not see the body
1) Ace
2) Red Cap
3) One of the Los Lobos (the woman)
4) Cat Sith
5) That crooked cop who used to be in SI -- R-- something.   
6) The young minion of Nik that switched sides at the end of Skin Game (Maybe not a villain anymore)
7) The young teen that Harry saved in Ghost Story (also not a villain)
8) That assassin of Marcones that was disguised as the scared neighbor of the drug dealer in one of the books
9) The centaur follower of Auora
10) Talos of Auora
11) The guy who stole the temple dogs (never seen)
12) Ebs

Others I am forgetting...
Title: Re: Which absent villian will appear in Peace Talks?
Post by: groinkick on September 13, 2017, 02:26:35 AM
Or he'll somehow come roaring back into relevance.  Even if Harry doesn't need closure on Lord Raith, Thomas does.  After all, Raith made his life hell, he killed his mother, and he trussed him up as a sacrifice.  There's a showdown owed there.

I hope he regains full power actually.  To see him be taken down in his current form wouldn't be that satisfying
Title: Re: Which absent villian will appear in Peace Talks?
Post by: Rasins on September 13, 2017, 01:56:18 PM
Not a villain, but I want to find out what happened to Wizard Montjoy.
Title: Re: Which absent villian will appear in Peace Talks?
Post by: Kindler on September 13, 2017, 03:23:06 PM
Not a villain, but I want to find out what happened to Wizard Montjoy.

He was the one who was down in the Yucatan in Summer Knight, right? A "research trip," if I recall correctly. Which happens to be Chichen Itza's location. I forgot about him until just now. Well, someone had to figure out how to use the leylines and sacrifices to fuel a massive bloodline curse.

Dang it. Jim's making me see Black Council members everywhere.
Title: Re: Which absent villian will appear in Peace Talks?
Post by: Rasins on September 13, 2017, 05:33:55 PM
He was the one who was down in the Yucatan in Summer Knight, right? A "research trip," if I recall correctly. Which happens to be Chichen Itza's location. I forgot about him until just now. Well, someone had to figure out how to use the leylines and sacrifices to fuel a massive bloodline curse.

Dang it. Jim's making me see Black Council members everywhere.

I'm hoping for something a bit more ... covert.

Gotta remember that Montjoy was there BEFORE the start of the war (iirc).

I think he was down there "researching" the red court, because he, or someone on the council (Simon?) saw something coming.
Title: Re: Which absent villian will appear in Peace Talks?
Post by: Kindler on September 13, 2017, 06:15:07 PM
I'm hoping for something a bit more ... covert.

Gotta remember that Montjoy was there BEFORE the start of the war (iirc).

I think he was down there "researching" the red court, because he, or someone on the council (Simon?) saw something coming.

I thought of Archangel was the sucker punch the Reds used right as they declared war, like Pearl Harbor; the official declaration of war by Japan wasn't delivered from their embassy until the attack was already underway. I could be way off; I can never seem to remember the details of Summer Knight for some reason. They all seem to kind of flow together.

I'd be into another White Council bigwig (or biggishwig) showing some foresight aside from Eb, Rashid, Joe, and Martha.
Title: Re: Which absent villian will appear in Peace Talks?
Post by: RobReece on September 13, 2017, 09:47:00 PM
I thought of Archangel was the sucker punch the Reds used right as they declared war, like Pearl Harbor; the official declaration of war by Japan wasn't delivered from their embassy until the attack was already underway. I could be way off; I can never seem to remember the details of Summer Knight for some reason. They all seem to kind of flow together.

I'd be into another White Council bigwig (or biggishwig) showing some foresight aside from Eb, Rashid, Joe, and Martha.
According to the RCV, the war was initiated by Harry when he killed Bianca and burned her home down, this took place in the Fall.  The attack on Archangel was less than a week before Mid-Summer, roughly nine months later. Archangel was the first big bang, but small actions had already been underway and both sides had acknowledged it existence.
Title: Re: Which absent villian will appear in Peace Talks?
Post by: DonBugen on September 14, 2017, 01:23:28 AM
Quote
4) Cat Sith
What? He fell out the window! Into the lake! No one could survive that. He's probably dead.
Title: Re: Which absent villian will appear in Peace Talks?
Post by: wardenferry419 on September 14, 2017, 07:38:38 AM
I didn't see the body. No body might mean no death.
Title: Re: Which absent villian will appear in Peace Talks?
Post by: Rasins on September 14, 2017, 03:18:44 PM
What? He fell out the window! Into the lake! No one could survive that. He's probably dead.

I literally Gawfawed
Title: Re: Which absent villian will appear in Peace Talks?
Post by: Mr. Death on September 15, 2017, 01:11:47 PM
Perhaps more to the point, he fell into the icy cold waters of Lake Michigan.

Which is to say, into the same lake Mab claimed as her domain vis a vis grabbing Dresden's body.
Title: Re: Which absent villian will appear in Peace Talks?
Post by: Rasins on September 15, 2017, 03:38:36 PM
Perhaps more to the point, he fell into the icy cold waters of Lake Michigan.

Which is to say, into the same lake Mab claimed as her domain vis a vis grabbing Dresden's body.

I kind of wonder if he could survive the cure.
Title: Re: Which absent villian will appear in Peace Talks?
Post by: Mr. Death on September 15, 2017, 04:27:17 PM
I kind of wonder if he could survive the cure.
Cats do have nine lives...
Title: Re: Which absent villian will appear in Peace Talks?
Post by: Rasins on September 15, 2017, 04:48:16 PM
Ah, but how many has he used already.
Title: Re: Which absent villian will appear in Peace Talks?
Post by: Phariah on September 24, 2017, 12:03:37 AM
I am saying Lara, Mavra, Cowl. the big shocker would be that Cowl shows up representing, *dun-dun dunnnnn*,  Drakul!
Title: Re: Which absent villian will appear in Peace Talks?
Post by: kazimmoinuddin on September 24, 2017, 12:27:32 AM
As official representatives, beings would have something akin to diplomatic immunity. So beings that would usually be setting off conflict could be coming together.
Title: Re: Which absent villian will appear in Peace Talks?
Post by: Phariah on September 24, 2017, 12:46:04 AM
As official representatives, beings would have something akin to diplomatic immunity. So beings that would usually be setting off conflict could be coming together.
ya. you will see 3 sides. the Black, the White, and the fence sitters. imho the sitters will also be divided into secret allies to one of the other 2, some secret minor cult/ sect/ whatever, and others that are looking at what happens with the thoughts of survival and profit.
Title: Re: Which absent villian will appear in Peace Talks?
Post by: Froklsnt on September 26, 2017, 03:18:39 PM
I disagree that there will be just two clear factions plus the fence sitters. The known signatories of the Accords are:

Quote from: Unseelie Accords, Dresden Files wikia
The Archive (both an emissary and a Freeholding Lord)
The Denarians - Nicodemus Archleone no longer a signatory as of Skin Game
Donar Vadderung, CEO of Monoc Securities
Both Faerie Courts
John Marcone (the first non-supernatural to sign onto the Accords)
Vampire Courts
The White Council
The Svartalves
Drakul
A semi-immortal shapshifter guru in Ukraine
Two Dragons
The Fomor

We know the Fomor called this meeting. No one really likes like Fomor, expect maybe the BCV and some of the immortal creatures we've barely met, maybe. The Fae exiled them to begin with, they've pissed off the Svartalves (Bombshells), WCV and Marcone (Even Hand, Aftermath), and the WCW. I'm confident Vadderung and the Archive aren't fans. They've taken all of the Reds old territory, I'm sure they're just fine with that.

Now, if those are your battle lines, I see where you're coming from. But everyone on that large side has wildly different interests regarding everything else. I really don't see nice even factions developing, even if the Fomor are that polarizing.
Title: Re: Which absent villian will appear in Peace Talks?
Post by: Mr. Death on September 26, 2017, 04:39:53 PM
Well, let's see if we can at least narrow down who's probably in whose favor:

The Archive: She's inclined to favor the White Council and Harry in particular, which puts her in Winter's corner at least where he's concerned. If she knows that Summer was actively hindering Harry from saving her from the Denarians, that would put her against them.

The Denarians: It wasn't clear to me whether they were expelled as a whole or it was just Nicodemus -- remember like half of them were involved in breaking the Accords. Anyway, they probably don't have many in their corner.

Donar Vadderung: Definitely on the White Council and Winter's side, given his friendship with Harry (and that he's Santa).

Winter: With Harry as a go-between, they're probably most inclined to ally with the White Council, especially considering Chichen Itza, where not only the Winter Knight but the Leanansidhe helped win the White Council's war. Mab's position on the other signatories aside from Vadderung would be murkier.

Summer: Now, them I see as a wildcard. They don't have any clear allies that I can think of, and Titania's apathy has no doubt been affecting their relations to the other signatories. It also depends on who she sends -- ironically, most of her known retainers are inclined to like Harry personally, and by extension be softer on Winter than she might want. My prediction? Either the Lady and Knight will show up to represent Summer (giving Harry a possible ally), or Titania herself will show up and throw a huge wrench into Harry's plans.

Black Court: May not even be signatories; the last time the Accords were revised was in the 90s, well after they were broken as a nation.

Red Court: Well, they're all dead, so if there's anyone speaking for them at all, it'd be a surprise.

White Court: Given the events of Turn Coat (where the Senior Council and Lara worked together and uncovered a plot to try and turn them against each other) and Changes (where the prince and hero of the White Court assisted in winning the Council's war), the White Court probably enjoys a relatively friendly public relationship with the White Council. Lara is no doubt scheming behind the scenes, but on the face of it, I think she considers it good business to make nice with the White Council for the moment.

The White Council: As mentioned, I think they can mostly count on allies among the Archive, the Winter Court, Vadderung and the White Court.

Svartalves: I don't know much about them; given their Norse mythology origins, however, I think they're probably on speaking terms with Vadderung. That Molly is a member of their nation probably puts them on good terms with Winter, too, if they weren't already.

Drakul and the rest, I don't know enough about to speculate.

The Fomor: Yeah, nobody's a big fan of theirs. But I wouldn't be surprised if some behind-closed-doors deals had gone down.
Title: Re: Which absent villian will appear in Peace Talks?
Post by: Rasins on September 26, 2017, 07:12:33 PM
A few things you missed ....

Lara and the white court are anti-fomor because the fomor have been attacking their prey, humans.

The Black court are probably still signatories, even if reduced in power and influence.

The members of Summer are fans of Harry, not winter or the Wouncil.  Same with the Svartalves with Molly.

Question:  Did the treaty with Mab regarding the use of the Ways by the council expire with the Rampires?
Title: Re: Which absent villian will appear in Peace Talks?
Post by: deflated on September 26, 2017, 07:35:38 PM
Ehh, I don't see Winter and the White Council necessarily being allied. There are close personal relationships between Winter and the wizards - Harry & the Gatekeeper both have feet in each camp - but between the organizations it is much more formal if not uncertain. The council as a group dealt formally with Mab in Summer Knight and were unsurprised when it appeared she was sitting out. Mab works with the council only if they do it on her terms.

I think the White Court/White Council relationship would be similar. The Raiths couldn't be seen to be publicly aligned with the Freaks beyond an 'the enemy of my enemy' deal.

The White Council has a rep for arrogance and pissing off much of the other signatories; Harry/Bianca was just a pretext for the Red Court to go to war, they were more than happy to start hostilities. They might find themselves on the outside of the happy Winter/Monoc/svartalves/Summer mutual defense pact.
Title: Re: Which absent villian will appear in Peace Talks?
Post by: Rasins on September 27, 2017, 03:36:35 PM
Ehh, I don't see Winter and the White Council necessarily being allied. There are close personal relationships between Winter and the wizards - Harry & the Gatekeeper both have feet in each camp - but between the organizations it is much more formal if not uncertain. The council as a group dealt formally with Mab in Summer Knight and were unsurprised when it appeared she was sitting out. Mab works with the council only if they do it on her terms.

I think the White Court/White Council relationship would be similar. The Raiths couldn't be seen to be publicly aligned with the Freaks beyond an 'the enemy of my enemy' deal.

The White Council has a rep for arrogance and pissing off much of the other signatories; Harry/Bianca was just a pretext for the Red Court to go to war, they were more than happy to start hostilities. They might find themselves on the outside of the happy Winter/Monoc/svartalves/Summer mutual defense pact.

I know Harry does this, but I don't know that the Council does this.  Yes they are known as arrogant, but I don't know about the pissing other nations off.
Title: Re: Which absent villian will appear in Peace Talks?
Post by: Froklsnt on September 27, 2017, 04:41:37 PM
For story-telling reasons, it makes a lot more sense for the White Council and Winter to not be aligned. So many more options for making things hard on Harry that way.
Title: Re: Which absent villian will appear in Peace Talks?
Post by: Mr. Death on September 27, 2017, 04:44:09 PM
I know Harry does this, but I don't know that the Council does this.  Yes they are known as arrogant, but I don't know about the pissing other nations off.
Yeah, that's Harry's rep, not the White Council's. The White Council is almost certainly much more diplomatic than Harry is.
Title: Re: Which absent villian will appear in Peace Talks?
Post by: Rasins on September 27, 2017, 05:56:51 PM
Yeah, that's Harry's rep, not the White Council's. The White Council is almost certainly much more diplomatic than Harry is.

Exactly.  Especially since we saw them with Arianna in Changes.  Not sure that would have happened if the Wouncil was irritating them all.
Title: Re: Which absent villian will appear in Peace Talks?
Post by: Mr. Death on September 27, 2017, 06:05:23 PM
The members of Summer are fans of Harry, not winter or the Wouncil.  Same with the Svartalves with Molly.
Here's the thing, though -- Molly's the Winter Lady now. That puts her in charge of a chunk of Winter, and able to act officially representing Winter with the only real oversight being Mab.

Having her as a friend means you do have Winter as a friend.

Harry's situation is similar, if to a lesser extent. He has significant rank in both nations, meaning he's more than just Harry Dresden when acting in official capacity. It might not necessarily make them allies, but both sides are going to be a little more courteous and careful toward him to avoid risking pissing off Mab or the White Council in an official capacity.
Title: Re: Which absent villian will appear in Peace Talks?
Post by: deflated on September 27, 2017, 06:08:39 PM
I know Harry does this, but I don't know that the Council does this.  Yes they are known as arrogant, but I don't know about the pissing other nations off.
When the RC war went sideways the council was not receiving help from other signatories; it was the Fellowship, etc. that was fighting with them - bitter enemies of the RC. Winter just allowed access to the Paths, buyer beware and it's up to you to avoid the nasties. No-one felt any urge to help the wizards.

Compare that to relationships like the UK & the US over the last 60 years, or even US/Saudi Arabia or the West African mutual defense alliance. The council had nothing and had to go cap in hand to the faerie courts for transport support when they realized they were losing. They were too cocky to cultivate alliances for future unforeseen conflicts and disliked enough that they couldn't drag anyone onto their side without great provocation from the RC. Even the Fomor could get some sort of tentative agreement with other signatories; the council didn't seem to be capable of that.
Title: Re: Which absent villian will appear in Peace Talks?
Post by: kazimmoinuddin on September 27, 2017, 09:24:23 PM
Fomor are part Sihde, those that lost and were cast out. They are united in revenge, so eventually they will go after the faerie courts. Summer and winter must be aware of this, so even if they appear to side with them, they are expecting the back stab and preparing their own.
Title: Re: Which absent villian will appear in Peace Talks?
Post by: Rasins on September 28, 2017, 05:55:02 PM
When the RC war went sideways the council was not receiving help from other signatories; it was the Fellowship, etc. that was fighting with them - bitter enemies of the RC. Winter just allowed access to the Paths, buyer beware and it's up to you to avoid the nasties. No-one felt any urge to help the wizards.

Compare that to relationships like the UK & the US over the last 60 years, or even US/Saudi Arabia or the West African mutual defense alliance. The council had nothing and had to go cap in hand to the faerie courts for transport support when they realized they were losing. They were too cocky to cultivate alliances for future unforeseen conflicts and disliked enough that they couldn't drag anyone onto their side without great provocation from the RC. Even the Fomor could get some sort of tentative agreement with other signatories; the council didn't seem to be capable of that.

Actually we don't know.  All we know are those things that Harry put in his books. 

For all we know the Wouncil's financial division may have been working arm-in-arm with other supernatural nations to ruin the Reds.  Or others may have been providing intelligence.  We really don't know.
Title: Re: Which absent villian will appear in Peace Talks?
Post by: Mr. Death on September 28, 2017, 06:33:51 PM
Actually we don't know.  All we know are those things that Harry put in his books. 

For all we know the Wouncil's financial division may have been working arm-in-arm with other supernatural nations to ruin the Reds.  Or others may have been providing intelligence.  We really don't know.
Also, it's foolish to assume that the small handful of supernatural nations have the same sorts of mutual defense pacts that the 200+ nations on the planet do. They seem to operate mostly independently, and war happens infrequently enough that standing alliances aren't necessary.

So just because everyone didn't jump to help the White Council doesn't mean that it's because the White Council went and pissed every one of them off. It's simply because it's not their problem.
Title: Re: Which absent villian will appear in Peace Talks?
Post by: kazimmoinuddin on September 28, 2017, 08:10:35 PM
The white council was working with the fellowship quite closely, so enough to find and aid the remains. It might not be an official position, but the remains of the fellowship would be useful assets.
Title: Re: Which absent villian will appear in Peace Talks?
Post by: deflated on September 28, 2017, 08:42:01 PM
Actually we don't know.  All we know are those things that Harry put in his books. 

For all we know the Wouncil's financial division may have been working arm-in-arm with other supernatural nations to ruin the Reds.  Or others may have been providing intelligence.  We really don't know.
If they were getting help it wasn't at all effective which is pretty much the same thing. The council was on the defensive and in significant trouble. Any hypothetical off-screen assistance was not much more than useless at the rate the council was losing wardens and wizards. It is improbable that a commander like the Merlin could look at the casualties and trends in the war and not make a deal for (for example) a company of Einherjaren for security at each key location if a deal was possible. Just doing that to free up the wardens as an offensive force would have been a huge benefit.

It makes no sense within the context to think that the council were ignoring alliances and it makes no sense that they couldn't offer an incentive (political, financial or magical) that some significant power would be interested in. Unless the big players were too scared of the RC to get involved (also improbable) they had no interest in helping the council.
Title: Re: Which absent villian will appear in Peace Talks?
Post by: Rasins on September 29, 2017, 03:22:01 PM
Deflated,

I think of the Rampire war as something like a war between the USA and USSR.

There are all kinds of smaller powers, but something between these two no one else can really be very effective against.
Title: Re: Which absent villian will appear in Peace Talks?
Post by: phoenixjustice on September 30, 2017, 06:14:26 PM
That post about the Eebs is not definitive, it simply said at the time of the curse they were in a high security location in the never never, it never actually said they survived. I am betting the curse did hit them, but it is possible using the malleability of the never never, and the intervention of someone powerful, they could have survived the curse, but they would be deeply dependent, and have lost most of their independence.

Actually it never said the Eebs specifically, just Red Court. I should know, I'm the one who asked and got the WOJ. :P (Unless there's another WOJ out there that singles them out specifically.)

(https://i.gyazo.com/d9234eb8eb6524e5af61421043b6dba8.png)
Title: Re: Which absent villian will appear in Peace Talks?
Post by: kazimmoinuddin on October 01, 2017, 02:21:38 PM
Were the Eebs the ones who took Maggie and slaughtered her foster family? Such a personal link would make them a good chance to reappear to torment Maggie, and for her to see her father deal with the monsters of her nightmares.
Title: Re: Which absent villian will appear in Peace Talks?
Post by: deflated on October 02, 2017, 05:41:41 PM
Deflated,

I think of the Rampire war as something like a war between the USA and USSR.

There are all kinds of smaller powers, but something between these two no one else can really be very effective against.

Don't see it. Winter rolls right over RC or Council without blinking. Summer the same. The way the Fomor managed to slot so quickly right into the vacuum left by the RC shows that they are a similarly (or larger) sized organization that can hold their own against either. One of the most notable attacks by the RC was only possible with some minor assistance from the Fomor; if they fully threw in with either side the war would've been over in a month.
Title: Re: Which absent villian will appear in Peace Talks?
Post by: Mr. Death on October 02, 2017, 05:52:41 PM
Don't see it. Winter rolls right over RC or Council without blinking. Summer the same. The way the Fomor managed to slot so quickly right into the vacuum left by the RC shows that they are a similarly (or larger) sized organization that can hold their own against either. One of the most notable attacks by the RC was only possible with some minor assistance from the Fomor; if they fully threw in with either side the war would've been over in a month.
That doesn't really track.

If the Fomor was as big as the Red Court, they would have been a nation in their own right.

The Fomor have largely gotten by up to now by being an unknown, a surprise that nobody was ready to deal with. They've been sneaky and avoided direct conflict. It's even mentioned that a wizard living in town is enough to keep them out of it or at least severely reduce their activity.

They're a small fish trying to become a bigger fish. It's telling that they're going for these talks after a couple years, when other groups are starting to catch onto and stop what they're doing.
Title: Re: Which absent villian will appear in Peace Talks?
Post by: Froklsnt on October 02, 2017, 07:24:01 PM
The Fomor seem like they might have numbers but lack heavyweights. Or at least lack heavyweights willing to reveal themselves yet. They've shown very wide reach but haven't flexed much muscle yet. Maybe they have it in reserve, or maybe they don't have it at all. I'd guess the "former."
Title: Re: Which absent villian will appear in Peace Talks?
Post by: Griffyn612 on October 02, 2017, 07:43:25 PM
Were the Eebs the ones who took Maggie and slaughtered her foster family? Such a personal link would make them a good chance to reappear to torment Maggie, and for her to see her father deal with the monsters of her nightmares.
I don't think we know.  Given their methodology, I'd say it's a good possibility. 
Title: Re: Which absent villian will appear in Peace Talks?
Post by: LordDresden2 on October 03, 2017, 01:37:29 AM
Don't see it. Winter rolls right over RC or Council without blinking. Summer the same.

They can...except that they can't.  The weird rules that bind the Sidhe mean that they can only bring their full power to bear in limited cases.  Yeah, they've got the raw juice to defeat the Council, but are hamstrung in using it, and the Council is strong enough to make crushing them expensive, even for the Fairie Courts.

Among the non-Sidhe supernatural states, the Council is one of the Big Dogs.

Quote
The way the Fomor managed to slot so quickly right into the vacuum left by the RC shows that they are a similarly (or larger) sized organization that can hold their own against either.

No, it doesn't.  Anybody can step into a vacuum.  We don't know that the Fomor have fully filled the vacuum left by the RC, in fact they almost certainly have not done so. The Fomor are one of many groups competing to fill part of the void left by the absence of the RC.  They've managed to do a lot of in and around Chicago, but not necessarily planet-wide.

Quote
One of the most notable attacks by the RC was only possible with some minor assistance from the Fomor; if they fully threw in with either side the war would've been over in a month.

Probably not.  The Fomor on their own are potent, but not that potent.  They'd have been useful allies to either side, but no more.\

The White Council had a hard time with the Red Court for multiple reasons:

1.  They were complacent and ill-prepared, and their leadership (aided by Peabody, possibly others) were fractious and riven and didn't want to deal with the reality of what was happening.

2.  The Red Court had been preparing, laying the groundwork, for the war for quite some time before it broke out.  They had plans in place and resources ready.

3.  The Council still hasn't found a fully effective way to deal with the tech bane issue, and they hadn't been trying very hard as of the start of the Red War.

4.  Caught off-guard, the Council lost a lot of their assets fast in the early days of the war, and had to struggle back from behind as a result.

5.  The Reds had help from Outside, the Circle/Black Council/whatever they are, and other hidden allies.

Even so, the war was gradually starting to turn as time passed.  The Wizards were slowly pushing back the Reds.  Both sides were preparing their respective knockout punches when Harry made the issue moot, so we don't know how that would have played out.
Title: Re: Which absent villian will appear in Peace Talks?
Post by: kazimmoinuddin on October 03, 2017, 02:22:42 AM
I wonder since the rcv prepared for this war, could these plans and preparations have been shared with the fomor?
Title: Re: Which absent villian will appear in Peace Talks?
Post by: forumghost on October 03, 2017, 05:46:29 AM
I wonder since the rcv prepared for this war, could these plans and preparations have been shared with the fomor?

Since part of that prep involved things like "Buying Bio-Weapons from the Formor" probably on some level, yeah.

TBH though I really dislike the Formor. They just come out of nowhere and are suddenly an even bigger threat then the Red Court and have literally every other faction in the setting on the backfoot.

Like, they've been waging war the Sidhe, the Council, and the White Court simultaneously, for years by this point... and they're somehow not dead. This group of outcasts and nobodies are somehow the most powerful group in the Setting (excluding Mab's siege forces) and they basically just *poofed* out of thin air the moment the Reds died, because "lol of course nothing can get better this is the DF"
Title: Re: Which absent villian will appear in Peace Talks?
Post by: Mr. Death on October 03, 2017, 12:03:28 PM
The Fomor haven't been "waging war on the Sidhe, the Council and the White Court."

They've been kidnapping folks and gathering resources, occasionally being attacked and driven away by one of those three. We even know that they outright avoid cities that have a wizardly presence.

The Fomor haven't, to my knowledge, staged attacks specifically on any of those nations.

They seem to have an advantage because they take initiative and they're going after soft targets. But that doesn't mean they're actively waging war on all three, or that they're a tangibly bigger threat than the Red Court.
Title: Re: Which absent villian will appear in Peace Talks?
Post by: forumghost on October 03, 2017, 12:46:57 PM
The Council has been on the backfoot fighting them all over Europe, to the point that they have effectively abandoned NA.
As we see in GS, the White Court is coordinating with the Paranet and engaging them all across the USA.

The Formor have been (without provocation) attacking everyone on a Global scale, for the last... what two+ years? It gotten so bad that the Masquerade is falling apart despite the superhuman levels of head-in-sand that Humanity has in the DF.

So yeah, somehow they're the biggest threat in the series, despite living in a vacuum.
Heck, a couple of their Redshirts Turtlenecks are dangerous enough that Harry needed to be rescued from them, whereas the Red Courts top assassin went screaming like a little girl at the sight of him- and that was before he became the Winter Knight.

I mean, they're not just a rag-tag group. They're a Nation. A Nation that is shitting all over everyone, and yet nobody has punched their ticket yet. It's as if... I dunno... Sokovia decided to start attacking every other nation in the UN, but nobody did anything about it because... reasons?

After over two years of fighting across the globe "They're going after soft targets" and "They have the initiative" is not much of an argument. Just go down to Lake Michigan and waste so fish-men already, c'mon.
Title: Re: Which absent villian will appear in Peace Talks?
Post by: Kindler on October 03, 2017, 01:27:51 PM
The Council has been on the backfoot fighting them all over Europe, to the point that they have effectively abandoned NA.
As we see in GS, the White Court is coordinating with the Paranet and engaging them all across the USA.

The Formor have been (without provocation) attacking everyone on a Global scale, for the last... what two+ years? It gotten so bad that the Masquerade is falling apart despite the superhuman levels of head-in-sand that Humanity has in the DF.

So yeah, somehow they're the biggest threat in the series, despite living in a vacuum.
Heck, a couple of their Redshirts Turtlenecks are dangerous enough that Harry needed to be rescued from them, whereas the Red Courts top assassin went screaming like a little girl at the sight of him- and that was before he became the Winter Knight.

I mean, they're not just a rag-tag group. They're a Nation. A Nation that is shitting all over everyone, and yet nobody has punched their ticket yet. It's as if... I dunno... Sokovia decided to start attacking every other nation in the UN, but nobody did anything about it because they're "just going after soft Targets"

I kind of agree with you there on some points, but the Fomor don't seem to be engaging in full on fighting with them. They're working on grabbing werewolves off the street, similar to the plot in White Night, and adding those little powers to their own.

Seems to me that they're staying mobile. In "Aftermath," they're in town for, what, two, three days? They were closing up shop and getting ready to vamoose.

Winter has been on the backfoot, so to speak, since Mab was spending most of her time keeping Harry alive, then training him to murder her daughter, then keeping watch over Molly while getting back at Nicodemus—and acquiring some apparently major artifacts for the coming fight. I expect that to change when the Peace Talks fall apart; Winter is coming back in a big way.

It's not surprising that the White Council pretty much bounced out of North America; they never really cared about it before, and only had a handful of wardens keeping an eye on it, despite having the same population as half of Europe. They don't seem to be particularly threatening to wizards in general; Ramirez was injured, as I recall, but the circumstances of that are unknown. Plus, he kind of gets injured a lot (I think he's ended every book appearance in the hospital, including Changes—he was down with whatever biological weapon was used against the Council). He's like the warden version of Jeremy Shockey.

The White Court... I don't know what it is they're doing, so I can't really comment on it. I'd assume that they're gathering intelligence with the Paranet to protect their herd. And I further assume that their attempt at resolving the situation is going to be seen in Peace Talks.

In fact, I don't think I've ever seen the White Court Vamps do anything useful in the war, except help Harry, so I don't know what it is they're doing.

Anyway, I think the Fomor are a threat because they did come out of nowhere, and nobody was prepared for the things that they can do. The White Council has to shift gears to fight a totally different kind of conflict, with a target from the sea rather than Central and South America. They likely didn't even take them seriously at first, figuring they were just some upstart nothing organization. I think they've had to reconsider the threat level they represent, even though I'm positive Cristos is busy distracting them by inciting unrest.

All that aside, I do agree with you that I don't generally like the idea of introducing a new threat totally out of left field and selling them as bigger or more dangerous than anything else. It's what Supernatural (a guilty pleasure of mine) did with the Leviathans a few years ago; even though they weren't capable of anything worse than any other monster, they were sold as more dangerous than angels, despite us having watched angels travel through freaking time on more than one occasion. They spent way too much time telling us how incredibly deadly and scary we were supposed to find them, but at most they were comically violent. This was instead of showing us what they were really capable of.

Now, I trust Jim; he wouldn't do this without a reason, and I'm convinced that the Fomor have been in the plan for a while; on the Wiki, it speculates that Nicodemus's "beasts" were provided by them, for example. We haven't really seen the Fomor interact with any of the major players on the page; I think that, once we do, my opinion of them as a threat will change.

That aside, I did find the one in Aftermath threatening (Nobody? That was his name, right?) I could see an army of him giving anyone pause.

DISCLAIMER: I haven't read Even Hand yet, so my only direct knowledge of them is Aftermath, Molly's scuffle in Ghost Story, and the Octokongs.
Title: Re: Which absent villian will appear in Peace Talks?
Post by: Mr. Death on October 03, 2017, 01:32:13 PM
Yeah, the Fomor "war" isn't like the Fomor wading up on shore and invading en masse. It's them snatching people and running away before the bigger powers can get them.

They're a "threat" not in the sense that they could take the White Council, the White Court and Winter in open fighting. They're a "threat" because they're sneaky, unscrupulous, unknown and really underhanded.

Their "big attack" in the Red Court war was a biological weapon. Humans can do that.
Title: Re: Which absent villian will appear in Peace Talks?
Post by: Kindler on October 03, 2017, 01:37:26 PM
Yeah, the Fomor "war" isn't like the Fomor wading up on shore and invading en masse. It's them snatching people and running away before the bigger powers can get them.

They're a "threat" not in the sense that they could take the White Council, the White Court and Winter in open fighting. They're a "threat" because they're sneaky, unscrupulous, unknown and really underhanded.

Their "big attack" in the Red Court war was a biological weapon. Humans can do that.

That was the Fomor? The gas attack in the backstory of Dead Beat that killed, like, a third of the wardens? Or was it something else in one of the short stories that I haven't read because I'm stubbornly waiting for Brief Cases?
Title: Re: Which absent villian will appear in Peace Talks?
Post by: Mr. Death on October 03, 2017, 02:09:46 PM
That was the Fomor? The gas attack in the backstory of Dead Beat that killed, like, a third of the wardens? Or was it something else in one of the short stories that I haven't read because I'm stubbornly waiting for Brief Cases?
I think in Bombshells it's mentioned that they supplied the gas.
Title: Re: Which absent villian will appear in Peace Talks?
Post by: Kindler on October 03, 2017, 03:02:24 PM
I think in Bombshells it's mentioned that they supplied the gas.

Ahhh. Okay, thanks. I'll take your word for it.

I'll be over here grumbling about my lack of Dresden because of my own stubbornness. :)
Title: Re: Which absent villian will appear in Peace Talks?
Post by: dspringer1 on October 03, 2017, 05:23:14 PM
The formor have not been waging war in the accords sense.  They have not made war with any major supernatural race.  The formor have been very aggressively moving to grab mortals with supernatural powers (who do not have status under the accords), although that has put them in some conflict with the White Council which has some protective impulses over the lesser human magic types. 

In the process, they have been riling the other supernatural powers. 
*  They have clearly been pressing against White Council interests in Europe and North America. 
*  It is implied that other supernatural powers are being pressed as well, especially those who want to take territory in the former Red Court lands.  Not at the level of a war, but certainly at the level where "border incidents" and "diplomatic incidents" and "regrettable deaths of not quite formal allies" occurs
*  They have been unusually public in their pursuit, raising worries that normal humans will become aware of supernatural events
*  They have seriously offended the Svartelves (aka - as seen in Bombshells).  And the svartelves were worried about the Formor actions before these events occurred - which was why the agreement with the Formor was originally planned. 
*  They clearly care little for the accords
*  Winter is clearly seeing them as a threat and working to contain that threat (also seen in bombshells)
Title: Re: Which absent villian will appear in Peace Talks?
Post by: RobReece on October 03, 2017, 06:52:33 PM
Well, we know that Mab is going to be looking to take them down a notch, they were attempting to violate her Accords with their backstabbing actions in 'Bombshells'.
Title: Re: Which absent villian will appear in Peace Talks?
Post by: dspringer1 on October 03, 2017, 11:02:49 PM
Quote
Well, we know that Mab is going to be looking to take them down a notch, they were attempting to violate her Accords with their backstabbing actions in 'Bombshells'.

I think you are misreading the situation.   Mab is going to take down the Formor because she believes they are working with the Outsiders.   However, Mab is constrained in her actions.  If she can get the formor to actually violate the accords, then she can directly act against them.  Right now she is limited to indirect action like that of Leah in Bombshells. 

Do not get me wrong.  Mab will defend the accords in any case.  All I am saying is that Mab had very good reasons to take down the Formor well before any accord violation takes place.   She is actively looking for an excuse to act. 

Title: Re: Which absent villian will appear in Peace Talks?
Post by: Vorrobblev on October 03, 2017, 11:09:39 PM
Cronos, he has pent the last 3 years torturing us.
Title: Re: Which absent villian will appear in Peace Talks?
Post by: kazimmoinuddin on October 04, 2017, 08:45:09 PM
The fomor are the remains of destroyed courts. They are also part Sihde, I could see mab going after them as sacrifices to further empower the lands of faerie for the coming battle, and remember ven a threat that could strike if they are perceived vulnerable.
Title: Re: Which absent villian will appear in Peace Talks?
Post by: wardenferry419 on October 04, 2017, 10:08:01 PM
And we have at least one more year to go. Sorry, feeling devilish.
Title: Which absent villian will appear in Peace Talks
Post by: Bentjudges on October 15, 2017, 03:39:09 PM
Hi everyone.  So far I really liked the music of the first book. But I want to buy the rest of them. Does anyone know when they will be released?
Title: Re: Which absent villian will appear in Peace Talks?
Post by: wardenferry419 on October 15, 2017, 09:02:20 PM
Dude, if you liked the first book than you got 14 more out, about 30 short stories, and a whole bunch of comics. Don't forget to read the RPG books as well; they are very insightful. Happy Journey!