My 2007 goal was to get one query off before the end of the year. I got four off.
Three came back right away (all were e-filed) but the blasted 4th one, coming from one was a 2nd query from same agency, sat and sat. I started fretting because it's one huge historical manuscript from the 1100's that hasn't been vet-ed yet. Finally after 2 long months I got a very nice rejection, "very interesting but we located a manuscript that better met our goals in this area." Best of ALL WORLDS! They liked, but didn't want it! It wasn't rejected out of hand!
To me folks that is really top notch. I sent back a thank you for having seriously considered it and did not mention the damn thing wasn't anywhere up to snuff for sending to agent. Shouldn't have sent it in the first place, but they were specifically asking for similar work so I took a chance that I shouldn't have. I've been told that I write similar to Phillipa Gregory (Tudors-that's been a Showtime series) mine is much farther back in history. It runs the same time frame as Follet's Pillars of the Earth. I've spent over 10 years on the blasted thing and have loved the research & the travel to investigate and have grown to love a wonderful family as if they were my own. They truly are amazing people! So that, for me, is extremely gutsy.