Yeah, I read that way more in the save Harry from himself sense - "against" is not really applicable. The faithsaber burned him to *warn* him, after all.
Yes...
exactly! The faithsaber's angelic powers activated.
Again and again, we see Uriel explaining that purely-mortal actions and purely-mortal choices
do not give the Angels any scope to act.
Nicodemus' cadre of "Squires" shot up Michael's house, broke in, grabbed Charity, put
Uriel's mortal form at risk (with no Grace to save him!), while a bunch of
literal guardian Angels stood by and did ... nothing. Because the Squires were all mortals, acting with enough "Free Will" to be beyond Angelic intervention.
If it were just "Harry being Harry" -- mortal, fallible, flawed -- the Angel wouldn't have given Harry the slightest bit of discomfort. The Angels don't stop mortals from mortally screwing-up. The pain was a clear demonstration that, justified as his rage may have been, it wasn't just Harry being Harry; Harry was being
influenced.
... I'm not sure I buy the part about intense anger indicating Harry still has a shadow attached to him after all, either. He got a lot colder than when Lash was torqueing his temper, real quickly. Seems more Winter mantle behaviour...
TBH, I agree with you. Harry's symptoms were more "Wintery" than "Hellish," and we know the Knights might have a
particular interest in opposing the Denarians... but they'll stand against pretty much any/every supernatural threat.
An enraged Winterknight certainly qualifies (and justifies the Angelic action)!
I consider the "Lasciel's Shadow" theory a 2nd-choice to the "Winter Mantle" one, but also: why not both? I'm quite certain Lasciel knows how Faerie and Winter and Knightmantles work, and her Shadow likely knows how to work with "cold wintery rage." Deception isn't "second nature" to the Fallen, it's their
first nature!
And, I repeat a critical point: not one but two KotC's, 100% of the Swords in-play, were came to stop Harry; who was, in the end, merely a Knight of Faerie. Any one KotC could likely have stopped the Winterknight. Both of them hints more-than-gently at Denarian influence.
So (despite it being my "second choice" here) I find the Shadow not at all a distant second!
... My read on the scene was something powerful and knowledgeable, probably one or both of the Fallen, manipulated Rudy's mind ...
I don't think malign influence upon
Rudy allows Angels to act to stop
Harry. I point again to the Squires invading Michael's home: those Squires
certainly were under Nicodemus & Anduriel's influence; but the Angels still permitted the attack on Michael's home, and for Charity to be abducted.
But honestly, my take on Rudy was that he was indeed "just being Rudy:" cowardly, panicked, deep in denial about the existence of magic, stressed to the edge of sanity because he's experiencing magic with his own senses and
still refuses to believe. And really crappy trigger discipline.
We've seen all of this before from Rudy. And yes, this is perhaps the worst we've ever seen it... but then, the situation is the worst
he has ever seen: an
actual supernatural army is invading Chicago!
I don't think it takes the whispers of a Shadow (or other supernatural influence) to explain any of shitty things Rudy does.