Author Topic: Question about feeding and the Hunger track.  (Read 11302 times)

Offline Rougarou

  • Conversationalist
  • **
  • Posts: 113
  • Just like Disneyland.
    • View Profile
Question about feeding and the Hunger track.
« on: June 09, 2012, 04:20:50 AM »
Is it possible to clear a portion of a vampire PC's Hunger track without killing someone (and thus wiping it out) and sitting out scenes as described in YS where it talks about being "taken out" by Hunger after a conflict? I.e., Can a PC attack someone, succeed, and feed, reducing their Hunger stress by a number of shifts determined by the roll? I have not used any vampire PC's yet, so our group has yet to address this issue for ourselves.
"So you fought a hobo who tried to use a ritual to make himself a god?"
"We called him Hobosus."
"What?"
"Hobo plus Jesus. Hobosus."
- From a DFRPG campaign.

Offline Tedronai

  • Posty McPostington
  • ***
  • Posts: 2343
  • Damane
    • View Profile
Re: Question about feeding and the Hunger track.
« Reply #1 on: June 09, 2012, 04:39:33 AM »
Hunger stress (but not consequences and/or lost powers) is cleared entirely upon a successful defense roll against the hunger 'attack'.
Even Chaotic Neutral individuals have to apologize sometimes. But at least we don't have to mean it.
Slough

Offline Rougarou

  • Conversationalist
  • **
  • Posts: 113
  • Just like Disneyland.
    • View Profile
Re: Question about feeding and the Hunger track.
« Reply #2 on: June 09, 2012, 05:44:55 AM »
Hunger stress (but not consequences and/or lost powers) is cleared entirely upon a successful defense roll against the hunger 'attack'.
Yes, I am aware of that. I think I phrased the question wrong (not surprising since I'm exhausted). My real question is do you allow a player to feed mid combat (or even out of combat in some situations), without actually killing someone, in your games? If so, what mechanics do you use? I ask because I feel that, logically, a vampire who is Hungry, but not necessarily Famished, may want to feed, without killing someone, and the game rules should provide a method for doing so. Further, I feel there is support for this in the books, based on several vampires routinely feeding without killing.
"So you fought a hobo who tried to use a ritual to make himself a god?"
"We called him Hobosus."
"What?"
"Hobo plus Jesus. Hobosus."
- From a DFRPG campaign.

Offline Tedronai

  • Posty McPostington
  • ***
  • Posts: 2343
  • Damane
    • View Profile
Re: Question about feeding and the Hunger track.
« Reply #3 on: June 09, 2012, 05:59:57 AM »
I would generally represent such 'safe' feedings with the 'sit out a scene' option to recover from powers lost to hunger.
Beyond that, I would theorize that the resultant shallow feedings would provide such little real sustenance that little else would be an option during that scene, let alone offset the energy used in a combat scene.
Even Chaotic Neutral individuals have to apologize sometimes. But at least we don't have to mean it.
Slough

Offline Mr. Death

  • Posty McPostington
  • ***
  • Posts: 7965
  • Not all those who wander are lost
    • View Profile
    • The C-Team Podcast
Re: Question about feeding and the Hunger track.
« Reply #4 on: June 09, 2012, 02:36:51 PM »
There's nothing in the books that suggests that every feeding is or should be fatal. The way I read it, you do a feeding "attack," and however much physical stress you do to the bleeding enemy is how much stress you get back on the hunger track.
Compels solve everything!

http://blur.by/1KgqJg6 My first book: "Brothers of the Curled Isles"

Quote from: Cozarkian
Not every word JB rights is a conspiracy. Sometimes, he's just telling a story.

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC_T_mld7Acnm-0FVUiaKDPA The C-Team Podcast

Offline Tedronai

  • Posty McPostington
  • ***
  • Posts: 2343
  • Damane
    • View Profile
Re: Question about feeding and the Hunger track.
« Reply #5 on: June 10, 2012, 04:42:41 AM »
There's nothing in the books that suggests that every feeding is or should be fatal.
I don't think anyone is advocating against this interpretation.

The way I read it, you do a feeding "attack," and however much physical stress you do to the bleeding enemy is how much stress you get back on the hunger track.
I would say that I do not see anything in the text of either feeding powers or feeding dependency itself that would lead me to this conclusion.  Moreover, I highly suspect that a meaningful analysis would find this interpretation to quite thoroughly neuter any 'bite' that feeding dependency has, and thus its justification for providing a rebate.
Even Chaotic Neutral individuals have to apologize sometimes. But at least we don't have to mean it.
Slough

Offline Mr. Death

  • Posty McPostington
  • ***
  • Posts: 7965
  • Not all those who wander are lost
    • View Profile
    • The C-Team Podcast
Re: Question about feeding and the Hunger track.
« Reply #6 on: June 10, 2012, 04:39:04 PM »
I don't think anyone is advocating against this interpretation.
The OP's question amounts to "is it possible to feed without killing?" That's what I was answering, since he seemed to be under the impression that feeding was fatal to the victim by default.

Quote
I would say that I do not see anything in the text of either feeding powers or feeding dependency itself that would lead me to this conclusion.  Moreover, I highly suspect that a meaningful analysis would find this interpretation to quite thoroughly neuter any 'bite' that feeding dependency has, and thus its justification for providing a rebate.
Neither power says it explicitly, no. But both powers refer to the player "inflict[ing] enough stress and consequences to kill a victim from feeding." I.e., that feeding is done as an attack, which causes stress to the victim. Further, Emotional Vampire says,

Quote
This is done as a psychological attack with an appropriate skill (usually Deceit or Intimidation). If you have the Incite Emotion ability, inciting the emotion and feeding on it may be done as a single action, based on a single roll.

All of which points to the feeding powers being different forms of attack. An attack that causes stress, for a power that's meant, in part, to recover stress on your own track. I think it's a fairly logical step that stress caused by blood drinking or emotion eating attacks would recover stress from a feeding dependency for blood or emotions.

Point is, there has to be something in between "recover one stress per scene out" and "kill the victim" styles of feeding. And since both forms of feeding are described as attacks that cause stress, it makes sense to me that the stress caused would correlate to the stress recovered.
Compels solve everything!

http://blur.by/1KgqJg6 My first book: "Brothers of the Curled Isles"

Quote from: Cozarkian
Not every word JB rights is a conspiracy. Sometimes, he's just telling a story.

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC_T_mld7Acnm-0FVUiaKDPA The C-Team Podcast

Offline Becq

  • Posty McPostington
  • ***
  • Posts: 1253
    • View Profile
Re: Question about feeding and the Hunger track.
« Reply #7 on: June 11, 2012, 11:49:43 PM »
The rules offer two formes of feeding:

The first is feeding resulting in a death.  This relieves the vampire of all hunger, clearing the hunger stress track, clearing hunger-related consequences, and granting a scene's worth of healing.

The second is feeding not resulting in a death, which requires sitting out a scene, and allows you to recover abilities lost to hunger at a rate of one point per scene.

I don't see any option that allows partial recovery via in-scene feeding (other than killing).  This is not to say that there shouldn't be such rules; I am really not very fond of the feeding dependency rules.

Offline Tedronai

  • Posty McPostington
  • ***
  • Posts: 2343
  • Damane
    • View Profile
Re: Question about feeding and the Hunger track.
« Reply #8 on: June 12, 2012, 02:55:33 AM »
The first is feeding resulting in a death.  This relieves the vampire of all hunger, clearing the hunger stress track, clearing hunger-related consequences
By my reading, lethal feedings clear all stress tracks.

Other than that, your stated assessment is about identical to mine.
Even Chaotic Neutral individuals have to apologize sometimes. But at least we don't have to mean it.
Slough

Offline Rougarou

  • Conversationalist
  • **
  • Posts: 113
  • Just like Disneyland.
    • View Profile
Re: Question about feeding and the Hunger track.
« Reply #9 on: June 12, 2012, 11:51:06 AM »
There's nothing in the books that suggests that every feeding is or should be fatal. The way I read it, you do a feeding "attack," and however much physical stress you do to the bleeding enemy is how much stress you get back on the hunger track.
Like Tedronai, this isn't my interpretation of the rules. However, like you, the rules lead me to believe that this should be viable. But I also feel that of you inflict four stress and wipe out all boxes on the Hunger track up to and including the fourth, it takes the sting out of feeding dependency.

I believe that I will come up with a House Rule here that me and my group find satisfactory. May post it later.
"So you fought a hobo who tried to use a ritual to make himself a god?"
"We called him Hobosus."
"What?"
"Hobo plus Jesus. Hobosus."
- From a DFRPG campaign.

Offline Mr. Death

  • Posty McPostington
  • ***
  • Posts: 7965
  • Not all those who wander are lost
    • View Profile
    • The C-Team Podcast
Re: Question about feeding and the Hunger track.
« Reply #10 on: June 12, 2012, 03:09:45 PM »
Maybe if the feeding attack doesn't include strength or claws powers, or just weapon ratings in general. That would make it so feeding was less advantageous while in combat, since it would reduce the attack power of most creatures that would have a feeding dependency. Plus you'd need to have a really, really good roll compared to the target to get substantial nourishment out of it.

Because we know from the canon that it's possible to feed substantially without killing, and there really needs to be a way for Red Court Infected players to combat hunger stress without either going full vampire or sitting out bunches of scenes in a row.
« Last Edit: June 12, 2012, 03:19:33 PM by Mr. Death »
Compels solve everything!

http://blur.by/1KgqJg6 My first book: "Brothers of the Curled Isles"

Quote from: Cozarkian
Not every word JB rights is a conspiracy. Sometimes, he's just telling a story.

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC_T_mld7Acnm-0FVUiaKDPA The C-Team Podcast

Offline DFJunkie

  • Conversationalist
  • **
  • Posts: 624
    • View Profile
Re: Question about feeding and the Hunger track.
« Reply #11 on: June 12, 2012, 04:04:07 PM »
If you're looking for a middle ground you could treat the feeding as a maneuver and apply the tag to the next Discipline roll. 
90% of what I say is hyperbole intended for humorous effect.  Don't take me seriously. I don't.

Offline Becq

  • Posty McPostington
  • ***
  • Posts: 1253
    • View Profile
Re: Question about feeding and the Hunger track.
« Reply #12 on: June 13, 2012, 12:17:12 AM »
By my reading, lethal feedings clear all stress tracks.
Right, because it grants a scene's worth of healing -- which clears all of the normal stress tracks and mild consequences (and may do considerably more, depending on the character's Recovery).

Offline Sanctaphrax

  • White Council
  • Seriously?
  • ****
  • Posts: 12405
    • View Profile
Re: Question about feeding and the Hunger track.
« Reply #13 on: June 13, 2012, 05:38:40 AM »
Maybe if the feeding attack doesn't include strength or claws powers, or just weapon ratings in general. That would make it so feeding was less advantageous while in combat, since it would reduce the attack power of most creatures that would have a feeding dependency. Plus you'd need to have a really, really good roll compared to the target to get substantial nourishment out of it.

Because we know from the canon that it's possible to feed substantially without killing, and there really needs to be a way for Red Court Infected players to combat hunger stress without either going full vampire or sitting out bunches of scenes in a row.

The problem with this is that stress is usually meaningless. Seriously, inflicting stress doesn't even require you to hurt the target at all.

And stress goes away very quickly, at no cost.

So your proposed revision would promote munchkin-ish shenanigans in which people inflict small amounts of stress on their allies in order to recover hunger stress.

Offline YPU

  • Participant
  • *
  • Posts: 45
    • View Profile
Re: Question about feeding and the Hunger track.
« Reply #14 on: June 13, 2012, 09:39:27 AM »
I think you should also keep in mind that hunger is supposed to be a pain in the ass. Sitting it out takes a lot of time and if your not making your defence rolls, well then you might just be tempted to kill somebody feeding on them, I mean you really need your strengths up to defeat big bad necromancer dude, and really his thralls are probably brain-dead already right?... right?

Also, take into account that if you make a defence roll vs stress then you clear out your stress track. And while taking stress damage you start loose powers. You roll vs the powers you used. So as you start to loose powers the roll actually gets easier to make. Not entirely sure if you recover your powers with a successful defence roll, but I am sure somebody will be along to answer that any time now.
Your Personal Undead