The Dresden Files > DFRPG
Enchanted Items Patch - Important, holy crap!
LCDarkwood:
--- Quote from: flymolo on April 12, 2010, 05:18:59 PM ---I was modeling off Thaumaturgy and figure it's one scene per session, but based on this I'm thinking it only lasts until someone tries to see through it?
--- End quote ---
Yeah, I'd probably keep it around long enough for there to be a chance for someone to spot the character, like even if it took more than a scene.
But I'm pretty generous about that kind of thing as a GM - I think the most important thing is that an item feels useful to the player. So if the player called for the item in a scene because he thinks someone will try to spot him, and no one does, I'm not going to screw them over and be like, "Oh, your item's used up now," you know? I'm just going to say he's still got the option to veil when people finally do come looking for him.
That's not a rules thing, though, so much as it is a personal preference of taste.
Cripple X:
Pretty extensive overhaul here. I like it though.
I'm assuming this'll make it into the print books? It goes way beyond simple errata.
pogoman:
I just want to be perfectly clear on this point:
I buy a refinement. I can either get 2 specializations, 2 focus items, or 4 enchanted item slots. If I spend a specialization on crafting frequency, it now ups frequency for all my enchanted items by 2. If I get a focus item crafting frequency, it ups frequency for all my enchanted items by 2 (and I'm assuming I don't need the focus item on me at the time for this to work, although I could be wrong). If I add an enchanted item slot to an existing item, I can up the frequency by 1. So all are equivalent bonuses, correct (except that with multiple items a focus or specialization would be "worth more" than a single item slot)?
traeki:
I'm confused by the original math for the Crafting specialist.
Lore +5, Specialization +1, and then ... +2 for an evocation focus item? I don't get it. I didn't realize you could have focus items for crafting, first of all, but also if I read your post correctly you were saying that it was a +2 for "evo". Can you expand on that point a little bit?
iago:
--- Quote from: Cripple X on April 12, 2010, 05:48:10 PM ---Pretty extensive overhaul here. I like it though.
I'm assuming this'll make it into the print books? It goes way beyond simple errata.
--- End quote ---
Yep. Already in the source files. :)
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version