Author Topic: Questions about the Vampire Courts  (Read 1425 times)

Offline groinkick

  • Posty McPostington
  • ***
  • Posts: 7556
  • Strike first. Strike Hard. No Mercy! - Cobra Kai
    • View Profile
Questions about the Vampire Courts
« on: January 26, 2021, 02:33:55 AM »
I don't know if these questions have any solid answers, or not.  But I'd like any theories or answers. 

Are the Court's actually connected?  The vampires are similar in that they feed off of humanity but are the connections any more than that?  Are they actually related? 

The origins of them.  We know that Drakul's son created the Black Court (I think???).  So Drakul is the origin of the Black Court.  Without him, they wouldn't have come into existance.  Do the other Courts have similar origin stories? 

Is Drakul connected to other Courts?  One thing that stood out to me is that Drakul has some of the characteristics of the White Court vampires.  White skin like marble, and long black hair.  Very similar to the Raith's. 

I find myself wondering if Drakul is actually the origin of all the Courts.  One thought to me is that he had son's who created their own courts:

Black Court: Dracula (I think Eb said that he joined them as teenage rebelion but I thought Jim said he created them??)

Red Court: Lord Kukulcan "The pressure from his eyes was like an empty darkness that struck", much like the dark eyes of Drakul.

White Court:  I don't believe Lord Raith is the original leader of the Court, but because Raiths spread by birth, he'd be a direct relative, explaining the similarities in complection. 

Jade Court:  ??

Stole this from Reginald because it was so well put, and is true for me as well.

"I love this place. It was a beacon in the dark and I couldn't have made it through some of the most maddening years of my life without some great people here."  Thank you Griff and others who took up the torch.

Offline Avernite

  • Conversationalist
  • **
  • Posts: 720
    • View Profile
Re: Questions about the Vampire Courts
« Reply #1 on: January 26, 2021, 07:43:33 PM »
In the early books, when I still had an opinion, I felt it more as a loose association. The vampire courts are those human-predating supernaturals who came together in a loose alliance, and were dubbed vampires in the English language.

Now, this theory runs into a bit of a problem with the Jade Court who just don't act, and the Whites in the WC war, but it did seem in the early stages like the White Court was expected to join the Reds, i.e. that they were loosely allied. This would also make the Stokerlypse an epic backstab... and that is really what the Whites are.

By later books I've come to the conclusion they're called Vampire Courts because Butcher used all kinds of vampire tropes, threw them into a blender, and various vampires rolled out, in need of a cool name. So vampire courts it was.

Offline Yuillegan

  • White Council
  • Posty McPostington
  • *****
  • Posts: 1371
  • Forum Moderator
    • View Profile
Re: Questions about the Vampire Courts
« Reply #2 on: January 26, 2021, 09:55:47 PM »
You touch on something that has been discussed a few times.

I think in the early stages the Vampire Courts were similar to World of Darkness...vaguely related but quite different and not necessarily friendly.

I mean, humans are not that different and we don't all get along. And anyone who thinks we would all join hands in the face of an existential threat hasn't been paying attention. Like the White Court, some would use it to get advantage and settle scores. Some would try and organise everyone provided they were in charge. And some would isolate and let the others take each other out and only look after themselves.

So while they may share a similar origin, I believe the lack of unity should not be a surprise unless a strong leader forced them to work together. So far, only Drakul seems like he could do it and he doesn't seem interested.

I am not certain Drakul is the origin of all the courts (although I used to think so). His adherence to the more European/Black Court style suggests he isn't the origin, or he should have displayed traits of the other courts no?

But I do think all of them are related to the Outside...somehow. The descriptions and language used is a massive hint. The Lords of the Outer Night/Outer Dark, the description of empty darkness "empty night", the white's using that phrase, the use of Outsiders by both the Whites and Reds, Vampires showing up when Outsiders are involved, Drakul being a starborn and being involved with the stars and stones, the knowledge of Mordite by Ortega (which is meant to be a secret), Lord Faith's summoning of Outsiders and his unusual magical protection, and many, many other things.

I wondered recently if the Red King and his Lord's of the Outer Night were starborn too. Interestingly the paranet papers suggest that they fed off dark gods and became became godlike. But it's only a possible explanation. If they are starborn though perhaps it explains it... although we don't know how you go from Harry and Listen to that...

Harry notes Drakul is far stronger than the Lords of the Outer Night, perhaps stronger than them all combined.

And you're right, Lord Raith is unlikely to be the first White Court Vampire, and likely he is a close descendant if not immediate family member of the original. I suspect the original is dead as the Whites seem to be fairly political and probably killed their progenitor.

Also, an interview after Battle Ground changed the origin of the Black Court and seemingly rectifies apparent contradictions from previous statements. Originally Harry says that the Black Court have been around since the dawn of human kind. Then Ebenezer says that Dracula, son of Drakul, joined the Black Court as some sort of teenage rebellion. Jim then said in an interview several years ago that Dracula wound up turning himself into the first Black Court Vampire in order to impress Drakul, but it didn't work out. Then Jim comes out after BG when asked about this contradiction and said that Drakul created the Black Court and always had a small crew of superstars around him but then Dracula decided to expand it during the Middle ages and turn it into a a huge Court which lead to everyone getting resentful and killing them. Drakul clearly just kept on doing his thing.

My take is that Dracula was Drakul's human child, a scion perhaps, but in trying to impress dad became the more familiar Black Court Vampire and Drakul was very unimpressed.

Also apparently Drakul and Dracula have both existed long before their historical counter parts under other names in history, the basis for other monsters even.


Offline KurtinStGeorge

  • Posty McPostington
  • ***
  • Posts: 4202
  • Oh no, there goes Tokyo
    • View Profile
Re: Questions about the Vampire Courts
« Reply #3 on: January 27, 2021, 02:11:33 AM »
In an interview or an answer to a question at a Con a number of years ago, Jim said there are seven vampire courts.  (If my memory is correct.)  The Red, White and Black were the big three.  The rest fill some supernatural niches Jim didn't describe.  He also didn't say what their names were or where their territories were located, with the exception of the Jade Court.

My guess is that the vampire courts are related to one another, but not by a simple common link or method.  Actually, now that I think about it Jim has addressed this issue; again, a long time ago and not in a clear cut and easy to describe manner.  You might want to look through the WoJ section and see if anything's their that might help to answer this question.
Those are my principles, and if you don't like them... well, I have others.

Groucho Marx