Author Topic: Confused about the Second Law  (Read 4710 times)

Offline cunningrat

  • Lurker
  • Posts: 2
    • View Profile
Confused about the Second Law
« on: November 28, 2017, 08:01:31 PM »
I'm getting ready to start a DFRPG game. I was re-reading all the novels as part of the prep, and ran across the following bit in chapter 7 of _Fool Moon_:

Quote
“What are we doing, now?” Bob sniggered. “More weight-loss potions?”
“Look, Bob,” I said. “That was only to get me through a rough month. Someone’s got to pay the rent around here.”
“All right,” Bob said smugly. “You going to get into breast enhancement, then? I’m telling you, that’s where the money is.”

How are these NOT a violation of the Second Law? They are both transformations, and (as per the thaumaturgy section in Paranet Papers) transforming the body in even minor ways skirts afoul of the Second Law. And yet, here is Harry, still with the Doom of Damocles upon him at this point, blithely making weight-loss potions to pay the rent.

What am I missing?

Offline Sanctaphrax

  • White Council
  • Seriously?
  • ****
  • Posts: 12402
    • View Profile
Re: Confused about the Second Law
« Reply #1 on: November 28, 2017, 08:13:04 PM »
Maybe it was a non-transformation-based weight-loss potion. Like an appetite suppressor, or a metabolic accelerator.

Offline wardenferry419

  • Posty McPostington
  • ***
  • Posts: 5265
  • Can I get a Hells Bells !!!!
    • View Profile
Re: Confused about the Second Law
« Reply #2 on: November 28, 2017, 08:16:27 PM »
Maybe it doesn't count as transformation, which I see as altering one thing into another, so much as increasing/reducing what already exists.
Make Mine Butcher!
Who do I have to turn to ice to get a whiskey on the rocks?

Offline cunningrat

  • Lurker
  • Posts: 2
    • View Profile
Re: Confused about the Second Law
« Reply #3 on: November 28, 2017, 09:13:43 PM »
Maybe it was a non-transformation-based weight-loss potion. Like an appetite suppressor, or a metabolic accelerator.
Huh. Interesting. So redirecting bodily processes doesn't necessarily count as "transforming" someone. Good to know.

(The problem with this plan, of course, is that Harry -- IMO -- does not have the medical training to mess with someone's body like that and do it safely, but no one's ever accused Harry of excessive caution.)

Offline wardenferry419

  • Posty McPostington
  • ***
  • Posts: 5265
  • Can I get a Hells Bells !!!!
    • View Profile
Re: Confused about the Second Law
« Reply #4 on: November 28, 2017, 09:45:09 PM »
It is just my on-the-fly answer. But, seems to fit.
Make Mine Butcher!
Who do I have to turn to ice to get a whiskey on the rocks?

Offline Romulan Cmdr

  • Conversationalist
  • **
  • Posts: 512
    • View Profile
Re: Confused about the Second Law
« Reply #5 on: November 28, 2017, 10:51:14 PM »
Probably was just an appetite suppression. -they arent that hard to do.

Offline Taran

  • Posty McPostington
  • ***
  • Posts: 9859
    • View Profile
    • Chip
Re: Confused about the Second Law
« Reply #6 on: November 29, 2017, 02:13:30 AM »
I think you have to transform someone significantly. I'm pretty sure that they say it can alter a person's mind.  Turning them into a wolf could affect them in ways that might make them actually act like a wolf.  Or drive them insane.   

Healing doesn't seem to break the law.  I think minor cosmetic changes are fine.  Hunger suppression would work on certain chemicals in the body, just like the Alertness potion that is, essentially caffeine pills.  You could probably do disguises with transformation without too much issue too.  It's just a disguise spell. 

Offline whitelaughter

  • Conversationalist
  • **
  • Posts: 126
    • View Profile
Re: Confused about the Second Law
« Reply #7 on: November 30, 2017, 06:32:03 AM »
It only violates the 2nd Law if you do. If they do it, frex by drinking a potion you crafted, you are fine. That's why shapeshift is normally done by item.
A post of "I don't understand" will be ignored. The comment needs to say *what* bits you don't understand, and what bits you think you do, to be be worth responding to.

Offline wardenferry419

  • Posty McPostington
  • ***
  • Posts: 5265
  • Can I get a Hells Bells !!!!
    • View Profile
Re: Confused about the Second Law
« Reply #8 on: November 30, 2017, 10:17:47 AM »
So, it is more about choice and free will than a violation of the natural order?
Make Mine Butcher!
Who do I have to turn to ice to get a whiskey on the rocks?

Offline khadgar4606

  • Conversationalist
  • **
  • Posts: 137
    • View Profile
Re: Confused about the Second Law
« Reply #9 on: November 30, 2017, 12:29:53 PM »
plus its the free will portion were recipient drinking wants to loss weight. the moment harry tries to breast enchantment potion bob would freely adds aphrodisiac part and turn drinker to sex crazed person which pops wardens sense of breaking law but harry plays realy simple and safe in that book

Offline wardenferry419

  • Posty McPostington
  • ***
  • Posts: 5265
  • Can I get a Hells Bells !!!!
    • View Profile
Re: Confused about the Second Law
« Reply #10 on: November 30, 2017, 10:21:25 PM »
If only such potions existed.
Make Mine Butcher!
Who do I have to turn to ice to get a whiskey on the rocks?

Offline khadgar4606

  • Conversationalist
  • **
  • Posts: 137
    • View Profile
Re: Confused about the Second Law
« Reply #11 on: December 01, 2017, 12:54:07 PM »
If only such potions existed.
in dresden verse I think thats not hard to pull it of only if you do it for your self. its kinda have huge market open for it. cheap painless way for breast job at less then 3 thousand dolars. its a kill

Offline wardenferry419

  • Posty McPostington
  • ***
  • Posts: 5265
  • Can I get a Hells Bells !!!!
    • View Profile
Re: Confused about the Second Law
« Reply #12 on: December 01, 2017, 03:18:12 PM »
Considering some of the magic user's natures, a kill is probably what it costs.
Make Mine Butcher!
Who do I have to turn to ice to get a whiskey on the rocks?

Offline whitelaughter

  • Conversationalist
  • **
  • Posts: 126
    • View Profile
Re: Confused about the Second Law
« Reply #13 on: December 02, 2017, 04:19:18 AM »
Given the number of White Court vampires, yeah, hunting down a magical solution would be insanely risky. And remember the guy who said he'd die to be able to 'play like that'? Unseelie pacts would be just as dangerous.
Still, given the risks involved in RW wonder solutions to excess weight, it might still be worthwhile!

As a sideline of a PC I created with a Demesne, I decided to justify his Resources by him providing feasthalls of suckling pig etc to the local Jenny Craig; since the food turns to ectoplasm/evaporates when the clients leave the Demesne, they can gorge without weight gain. All the side effects of gorge/vomiting of course, but he wasn't a terribly nice PC.

Btw, would that be the main reason not to accept food from the Fae? You risk starving to death if you've been living on it? Or does it also open you up to Fae magic?
A post of "I don't understand" will be ignored. The comment needs to say *what* bits you don't understand, and what bits you think you do, to be be worth responding to.

Offline Mr. Death

  • Posty McPostington
  • ***
  • Posts: 7965
  • Not all those who wander are lost
    • View Profile
    • The C-Team Podcast
Re: Confused about the Second Law
« Reply #14 on: December 05, 2017, 06:50:12 PM »
The reason for the second law is that changing something's form will do trauma do them and change their mind, damaging them. It's referring to forcible shape-changing, like turning someone into a frog.

Weight loss just plain is not the same thing. It's a natural function, not shape-shifting. A weight loss potion probably just boosts metabolism to burn fat faster. Even at its most extreme, it's effectively just removing something from the body, not fundamentally changing the body's form and how it works.

Second Law is more, "What if I chopped off your arm and stuck a crocodile's mouth there instead?" style body horror, not just any slight change to a person's body.
Compels solve everything!

http://blur.by/1KgqJg6 My first book: "Brothers of the Curled Isles"

Quote from: Cozarkian
Not every word JB rights is a conspiracy. Sometimes, he's just telling a story.

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC_T_mld7Acnm-0FVUiaKDPA The C-Team Podcast