Author Topic: Working out a new Spirit Rote for attacking discorporate beings  (Read 5613 times)

Offline Orladdin

  • Conversationalist
  • **
  • Posts: 514
  • The Undauntable
    • View Profile
Re: Working out a new Spirit Rote for attacking discorporate beings
« Reply #15 on: March 28, 2012, 01:46:35 PM »
Having just re-read Grave Peril, I am now in agreement that this should be Thaumaturgy.  Only Evocable with ThamAtEvoSpeed from sponsored or something similar.
There is never a blanket answer to an ethical question.  This includes the Laws of Magic.

Perpetrator of The Cold Days Release FAQ

"I never make stupid mistakes. Only very, very clever ones."
-- The Doctor, Timewyrm: Genesys

Offline sinker

  • Posty McPostington
  • ***
  • Posts: 2115
    • View Profile
Re: Working out a new Spirit Rote for attacking discorporate beings
« Reply #16 on: March 28, 2012, 03:49:27 PM »
What specifically are you referring to Orladdin?

Offline Orladdin

  • Conversationalist
  • **
  • Posts: 514
  • The Undauntable
    • View Profile
Re: Working out a new Spirit Rote for attacking discorporate beings
« Reply #17 on: March 28, 2012, 05:27:39 PM »
What specifically are you referring to Orladdin?

How difficult Dresden finds it to
(click to show/hide)

He still has to draw the circle with salt and use candles (additional focus items).  It also takes him more than one exchange.

This is essentially the exact situation the OP gives.
There is never a blanket answer to an ethical question.  This includes the Laws of Magic.

Perpetrator of The Cold Days Release FAQ

"I never make stupid mistakes. Only very, very clever ones."
-- The Doctor, Timewyrm: Genesys

Offline Tedronai

  • Posty McPostington
  • ***
  • Posts: 2343
  • Damane
    • View Profile
Re: Working out a new Spirit Rote for attacking discorporate beings
« Reply #18 on: March 28, 2012, 05:35:09 PM »
Problem 1: Kravos' ghost wasn't a mook.  The fact that 'it took more than one exhange' to exorcise him is thus moot.  It would take more than one exchange to burn through his stress and consequence tracks with effective attacks.
Problem 2: Harry's 'Not So Subtle...' aspect makes it incredibly difficult for him to use any but the most blunt applications of Spirit, the element proposed for this effect.
Even Chaotic Neutral individuals have to apologize sometimes. But at least we don't have to mean it.
Slough

Offline Orladdin

  • Conversationalist
  • **
  • Posts: 514
  • The Undauntable
    • View Profile
Re: Working out a new Spirit Rote for attacking discorporate beings
« Reply #19 on: March 28, 2012, 09:06:20 PM »
Problem 1: Kravos' ghost wasn't a mook.  The fact that 'it took more than one exhange' to exorcise him is thus moot.  It would take more than one exchange to burn through his stress and consequence tracks with effective attacks.
Problem 2: Harry's 'Not So Subtle...' aspect makes it incredibly difficult for him to use any but the most blunt applications of Spirit, the element proposed for this effect.

Both good points.  I guess we should be discussing whether or not it makes sense for Morty to just flick a wrist and pop a posessing ghost out of the posessee... and if he can, did he take an extra ability (worth refresh) to do so?
There is never a blanket answer to an ethical question.  This includes the Laws of Magic.

Perpetrator of The Cold Days Release FAQ

"I never make stupid mistakes. Only very, very clever ones."
-- The Doctor, Timewyrm: Genesys

Offline Sanctaphrax

  • White Council
  • Seriously?
  • ****
  • Posts: 12405
    • View Profile
Re: Working out a new Spirit Rote for attacking discorporate beings
« Reply #20 on: March 28, 2012, 09:30:24 PM »
Could care less about novel examples. The game is not an extension of the stories. What works mechanics-wise should trump what simulates the books.

Offline GryMor

  • Conversationalist
  • **
  • Posts: 224
    • View Profile
Re: Working out a new Spirit Rote for attacking discorporate beings
« Reply #21 on: March 30, 2012, 12:37:10 AM »
There are three parts to this:
1. Is it something that reasonably shouldn't harm your unintended victims?
2. Does it satisfy the catch of your intended victim?
3. Does it fit cleanly into one of your evocation elements?

A Dawn attack likely satisfies 1 and 2 but will often fail on 3 if you don't have SM: Summer Court or something equivalent.

That said, there are a few examples in the book, Ghost Dust and Sunburst pg 304. If you can fit their effects into your evocation elements, then go ahead, otherwise you are stuck doing Thaum (either directly or with potions).

Offline sinker

  • Posty McPostington
  • ***
  • Posts: 2115
    • View Profile
Re: Working out a new Spirit Rote for attacking discorporate beings
« Reply #22 on: March 30, 2012, 03:11:19 AM »
I think that there's one thing that bugs me about not allowing this kind of thing. Because it penalizes a player for a specific thematic choice. The player is still attacking, they are still dealing stress. How that stress is dealt is fairly irrelevant.

3. Does it fit cleanly into one of your evocation elements?

Fire is supposed to have a purifying aspect (just like water is entropy, and air is movement, etc).

Offline Mr. Death

  • Posty McPostington
  • ***
  • Posts: 7965
  • Not all those who wander are lost
    • View Profile
    • The C-Team Podcast
Re: Working out a new Spirit Rote for attacking discorporate beings
« Reply #23 on: March 30, 2012, 03:18:21 AM »
Fire is supposed to have a purifying aspect (just like water is entropy, and air is movement, etc).
It'd be tricky to bathe a target body in fire and not harm the body itself, though.
Compels solve everything!

http://blur.by/1KgqJg6 My first book: "Brothers of the Curled Isles"

Quote from: Cozarkian
Not every word JB rights is a conspiracy. Sometimes, he's just telling a story.

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC_T_mld7Acnm-0FVUiaKDPA The C-Team Podcast

Offline sinker

  • Posty McPostington
  • ***
  • Posts: 2115
    • View Profile
Re: Working out a new Spirit Rote for attacking discorporate beings
« Reply #24 on: March 30, 2012, 04:33:27 AM »
Except it seems that one can use water's entropy aspect without directly using water. It follows that one can purify without directly using fire.

Additionally that was really a tangential point. My main point (that you're penalizing someone for a thematic choice) is the more important.