Author Topic: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3  (Read 137124 times)

Offline vultur

  • Posty McPostington
  • ***
  • Posts: 3942
    • View Profile
Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
« Reply #405 on: February 08, 2011, 01:27:00 AM »
- At what point did the Red Court and White Council, given that they were originally from different continents, come into contact to the point where they were really relevant to each other / capable of seriously threatening each other's interests? Spanish Colonial era? Early US? Mexican-American War? Later?

-How long did it take, once that happened, for the Red King to begin prepping for the Vampire War? Were there centuries of more-or-less-peace, or was he preparing for war pretty much from the moment the White Council seriously registered on his radar screen?

- Does Mab gain power from the Accords the way Lea gains power from deals with artists?

Offline niquerio

  • Lurker
  • Posts: 2
    • View Profile
Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
« Reply #406 on: February 08, 2011, 08:09:19 PM »
Will we be seeing Maggie Jr. in the future?

Offline Icecream

  • Posty McPostington
  • ***
  • Posts: 4212
    • View Profile
Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
« Reply #407 on: February 08, 2011, 08:34:34 PM »
I was under the impression Harry and Elaine were about the same age. However when Harry is imagining her in his head (the last time he saw her) he imagines Elaine as a 19 year old ? Is elaine 3 years older than harr?

Offline Landing

  • Posty McPostington
  • ***
  • Posts: 3666
    • View Profile
Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
« Reply #408 on: February 08, 2011, 11:36:25 PM »
I was under the impression Harry and Elaine were about the same age. However when Harry is imagining her in his head (the last time he saw her) he imagines Elaine as a 19 year old ? Is elaine 3 years older than harr?

this seems to imply that they are the same age.

Quote
“I don’t have any relatives. We were both adopted by the same guy, that’s all. We lived together, drove one another nuts, hit puberty together. Do the math.”

She nodded. “How long were you together?”

“Oh. Until we were about sixteen.”
Purveyor of the theory that the overarching plot of the Dresdenverse is that its all the dinosaur's fault.

DISCLAIMER: What Duck's says but funnier.

Offline Icecream

  • Posty McPostington
  • ***
  • Posts: 4212
    • View Profile
Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
« Reply #409 on: February 08, 2011, 11:50:02 PM »
I  will have to look it up again, but why would Harry be remembering Elaine as a 19 year old though ? Maybe I'm misremebering.

Offline Landing

  • Posty McPostington
  • ***
  • Posts: 3666
    • View Profile
Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
« Reply #410 on: February 09, 2011, 12:32:58 AM »
Yeah, I think you are, when he was imagining her so he could contact her he was thinking of the image he had from their soulgaze. It doesn't mention 19 anywhere in that section that I could find.
Purveyor of the theory that the overarching plot of the Dresdenverse is that its all the dinosaur's fault.

DISCLAIMER: What Duck's says but funnier.

Offline Icecream

  • Posty McPostington
  • ***
  • Posts: 4212
    • View Profile
Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
« Reply #411 on: February 09, 2011, 01:12:33 AM »
bleh I must be mixing different parts of the book, where he says ,molly is 19 .

Offline Warden John Marcone

  • Seriously?
  • ***
  • Posts: 19514
  • Shooting first and Cracking wise
    • View Profile
    • My Facebook
Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
« Reply #412 on: February 09, 2011, 07:19:28 PM »
Here's one.  If Lovecraft is true, and Dracula is true, is Frankenstein true?  If so what happened to Dr Frankenstein's monster?
The moribund equine has been more than sufficiently flagellated.

Offline Snowleopard

  • Needs A Life
  • ***
  • Posts: 27961
  • Small but sneaky.
    • View Profile
Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
« Reply #413 on: February 10, 2011, 07:15:15 PM »
Here's one.  If Lovecraft is true, and Dracula is true, is Frankenstein true?  If so what happened to Dr Frankenstein's monster?

Given JB we may yet find out.

Offline the neurovore of Zur-En-Aargh

  • O. M. G.
  • ***
  • Posts: 39098
  • Riding eternal, shiny and Firefox
    • View Profile
Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
« Reply #414 on: February 11, 2011, 02:54:34 AM »
Here's one.  If Lovecraft is true, and Dracula is true,

For "historical Drakul and Dracula are real like in RL and Stoker's Dracula is a natty bit of propaganda" values of true. Wasn't someone suggesting Kemmler as a Frankenstein riff a while ago ?
Mildly OCD. Please do not troll.

"What do you mean, Lawful Silly isn't a valid alignment?"

kittensgame, Sandcastle Builder, Homestuck, Welcome to Night Vale, Civ III, lots of print genre SF, and old-school SATT gaming if I had the time.  Also Pandemic Legacy is the best game ever.

Offline wardenferry419

  • Posty McPostington
  • ***
  • Posts: 5265
  • Can I get a Hells Bells !!!!
    • View Profile
Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
« Reply #415 on: February 12, 2011, 04:39:39 PM »
Is Cain and Abel important?
« Last Edit: February 12, 2011, 04:42:22 PM by wardenferry419 »
Make Mine Butcher!
Who do I have to turn to ice to get a whiskey on the rocks?

Offline Landing

  • Posty McPostington
  • ***
  • Posts: 3666
    • View Profile
Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
« Reply #416 on: February 14, 2011, 03:14:42 AM »
here is a question that came up in another thread (I'm younking it directly from parthagenon)

Why does the ban on enthrallment still apply to nonhumans, while the Law prohibiting killing only applies to humans?

in other words can we get some more info about how the Law about Enthrallment come about and what it is there for?
Purveyor of the theory that the overarching plot of the Dresdenverse is that its all the dinosaur's fault.

DISCLAIMER: What Duck's says but funnier.

Offline sjsharks

  • Posty McPostington
  • ***
  • Posts: 2006
    • View Profile
Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
« Reply #417 on: February 14, 2011, 05:05:42 AM »
here is a question that came up in another thread (I'm younking it directly from parthagenon)

Why does the ban on enthrallment still apply to nonhumans, while the Law prohibiting killing only applies to humans?

in other words can we get some more info about how the Law about Enthrallment come about and what it is there for?

But Harry does say (and I think you mentioned this in the other thread too) that the laws only apply to humans when talking about Toots name
And Chocolate is associated with love and love killed the Dinosaurs, you are a genius Sjsharks

TWCB-Dinosaurs

Offline sjsharks

  • Posty McPostington
  • ***
  • Posts: 2006
    • View Profile
Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
« Reply #418 on: February 14, 2011, 05:47:10 AM »
How does one "get real married" and what exactly is pyramid sitting?
And Chocolate is associated with love and love killed the Dinosaurs, you are a genius Sjsharks

TWCB-Dinosaurs

Offline Piotr1600

  • Posty McPostington
  • ***
  • Posts: 2930
  • Not *quite* the Eye of Providence...
    • View Profile
    • Go For Throttle Up - Music you haven't heard
Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
« Reply #419 on: February 14, 2011, 06:29:26 AM »
How long was Bianca in Chicago prior to running into Harry?
My band: http://www.soundclick.com/goforthrottleup -

The real problem with the shallow end of the gene pool is that it isn’t deep enough to allow the depth charges to arm. - By "Hardware" on Larry Correia's website.