Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - dspringer1

Pages: 1 ... 13 14 [15] 16
211
My two cents (or maybe 5 cents...)
 *  They do not need a law against stealing power from a wizard.   All wizards already are part of the White Council (or warlocks) and the white council already defends their own.   

*  They might need a law against stealing power from a magically weak mortal -- but I suspect the benefits are low.  Also, the white council protects mortals from wizards (and warlocks), so you will get into trouble either way.

*  The black staff is much less powerful than you people seem to think.  Or at least the power increase it grants is much less powerful.   At the end of the day, it gives the wielder the option to safely use some types of magic that they would otherwise not be able to use safely.   Unpleasant/disagreeable magic.   That gives the blackstaff some flexibility that other wizards do not have.  But it is not an increase in raw power.   In reality, I suspect the Blackstaff is usually not super skilled in these dark magics as they lack the in depth practice in those arts that they have in other magical schools.  So any magic is going to be relatively inefficient compared to what else they can cast.     Very useful yes -- but not a total game changer. 

*  It is certainly possible that the blackstaff gives a raw power boost, but that has not been confirmed by the books.   If it does, I suspect it does so with powers associated with death or ending (ie - powers associated with mother winter).  That is consistent with how Eb used the staff.   

*  The position of black staff also gives the wizard a lot of additional flexibility, primarily in "grey" areas that would otherwise be forbidden.   They can certainly go into the black with the blackstaff to protect them.  However, any obvious steps into the black would need to be justified to the senior council.   It is a license to break the rules to protect the council.  It is not a general exemption from the rules.    I would actually argue that the position of blackstaff gives more effective power to the wizard than possession of the black staff itself.  At least more power to a wizard that wishes to remain in good standing with the white council. 

212
DF Spoilers / Re: How Harry would do the Dark Hallow in Changes wag
« on: June 07, 2017, 09:05:58 PM »
The key word is "potential power ups".   Just like taking a denarian coin would be a potential power up.   There are lots of ways to get power - and many of them are very dark. 

213
DF Spoilers / Re: What is a Saint? (Series Spoilers)
« on: June 07, 2017, 12:08:19 AM »
I suspect Saints are something comparable to the Knights of the Cross -- although I suspect the Old Gods had their own versions of the same.      Priests who wield great divine power.   Although an argument can be made that demigods are the pre-Christian equivalent of a Saint. 

214
DF Spoilers / Re: Nemesis is different
« on: June 07, 2017, 12:02:59 AM »
Personal opinion that the outsiders are alien to this reality -- and see to destroy it.  (kudo agrabes who said it first).

Agree with Quantus that the Outsiders can be summoned into this reality by wizards. 

The fact that the outsiders are fighting at the outer gates implies strongly that they have the ability to enter our reality on their own, but are blocked by the Winter court fey/outer gates.   

Nemesis is a outsider "power".   I think the "He who walks..." types are generals or at least commanders of some type.  Nemesis is probably something more like an infiltrator or corruptor as opposed to a general.   In Denarian terms, one more like Andurial or Lasiel as opposed to Magog.    I suspect Nemesis is considerably more powerful than the "he who walk" types - and perhaps one of the great powers in the Outsider leadership.    Nemfection might be a new avenue of attack, but I suspect the theme of corruption and infiltration is the domain of Nemesis for a very long time. 

215
DF Spoilers / Re: If Hades shows up for Peace Talks in Chicago
« on: May 16, 2017, 05:24:25 PM »
Can destroy a fallen angel - certainly.   Uriel is a lot more powerful than an ordinary angel.

Is permitted to - probably not. 

216
DF Spoilers / Re: If Hades shows up for Peace Talks in Chicago
« on: May 15, 2017, 06:00:06 PM »
I have no doubt that angels can be killed - including fallen angels.  But I doubt there is much a mortal -- even a wizard - can do to achieve that outcome.   But i am certain a being like Hades or Mother Winter can do so if they were so motivated (and not otherwise prohibited by their mantle)




217
DF Spoilers / Re: If Hades shows up for Peace Talks in Chicago
« on: May 11, 2017, 05:46:15 PM »
Silly thought....

Hades -- if he comes --- brings Cerberus. 

Image 1 --  Cerberus and Mouse playing (and destroying) a conference room playing Frisbee tag

Image 2 -- there is an entire "pet sitting" room where all sorts of monstrous pets/mounts are "in doggie day care". 


I am going to sit in the corner and hyperventilate until these thoughts go away. :)

218
DF Spoilers / Re: If Hades shows up for Peace Talks in Chicago
« on: April 20, 2017, 10:15:12 PM »
The people who will show up to peace talks are those who are already involved - or those who want a strong say in what happens AND can create a legitimate excuse to be there.  Hades does not get involved -- and is not currently involved - so why would he be there.   

Even parties need an invite and the peace talks are bound to be more selective than that. 

219
DF Reference Collection / Re: Current DR wardens
« on: April 06, 2016, 09:00:16 PM »
Quote
Why is everyone convince that Luccio invented the swords? Sure she is the only one able to make them, but that might just be a matter of skill.

It was specifically stated in one of the books that Luccio was the ONLY person who could make the swords, and that her ability to do so was lost by her body swap at the end of Dead Beat.   Since that point, the WC has been unable to make any additional swords.   Apparently you needed a special magical trick or ability to make it work and that trick is very rare or perhaps unique to Luccio.

JB did mention that all the big WC leaders have some cheat or special ability that is not shared by other wizards.  Perhaps this was one of Luccios. 

220
DF Reference Collection / Re: Current DR wardens
« on: March 24, 2016, 11:03:20 PM »
I agree with the others.  I am not sure there is any mystical or deep significance to the cloak and the sword wardens wear.   I suspect the others are right that the original cloaks were grey to match demonreach (or maybe demonreach is gray to match the cloaks - who knows). 

The sword as a distinctive warden identifier seems to be a Luccio invention. She was able to create these really useful swords - so useful that eventually every warden got one.   Again - a tradition that just started and went on long enough that it became part of the image of the Wardens.   

LOTS of things we do today probably started out as rather arbitrary decisions that everybody copied until it became the WAY IT IS DONE.  And often times these arbitrary decisions were not the best decisions long term, but they still stuck.   Easy example is the keyboard for typewriters/computers.  Original design spaced out the commonly used keys to minimize the chance for the levers to stick.  That reason is long gone, but the design is still everywhere.   I see grey cloaks and swords as falling into that category.   

221
Cinder Spires Spoilers / Re: Some plot elements just bug me....
« on: February 04, 2016, 07:07:18 PM »
Quote
As for defense. The spirearch makes clear he cannot trust the Guard till the traitor are flushed. Also they are police he gives the numbers and points out they are stretched thin over 236 habitted habbles. He has to let things play out without any obvious response from himself other than the sending of a small secret force.


There are always spies and traitors in any large force.   The spirach was worried that if his agents worked closely with the local guard forces, that traitor would be warned off and his investigators would find nothing.  That is the risk he was avoiding.   To argue that the spirach is helpless to respond to information lest “a spy find out” is taking that argument to an extreme that does not make sense.   

It is entirely reasonable to suppose that the spirach might….
•   Once evidence is gained that Landing is where the enemy marines are based, he can concentrate more forces in/around that region and make sure they can respond quickly to fresh news
•   Once evidence (or reasonable suspicion exists) that the enemy might escape through a ship docked in Landing, then it is simplicity to cut off that retreat route by simply stationing a small warship in the mists nearby or making sure the landing defense installations stay on alert






Quote
The Fleets defensive strategy I've explained is down to Wilson. As to his genius Bayard and Grimm may have been ironic! There are clearly lots of problems within the fleet. If Jim is modelling the British Admiralty over its history then there's internal battles over Aristocratic Command structures mostly by baffoons buying their positions versus professional seaman earning command [Rook]. In any event he Wilson was thinking invasion not guerrilla warfare.
500  highly trained Marines vs 96 Grimms Crew [minus casualties as the book progresses]. Plus the Silkweavers [1000?] Grimm is outnumbered and has to be reactive following the marines  not taking them on one on one. He is ordered to protect Ferus group that's important  he cant defend the landing and do that with the resources he has. He also has no idea what the marines will do next.

I certainly agree that Grim could not protect the landing directly with his forces.  I certainly agree that the fleet admiral could have been operating as an idiot.  But even given all that, the defenses around landing were nonexistent even though it is a very critical and vulnerable port.   The fixed defenses alone should have been enough to easily deal with an armed merchant no matter the surprise gained.   

This is not a world which has been at peace for centuries.  Warfare is fairly common.  Spire Albion has been expecting war with Spire Aurora for years.   There are only THREE ports, and landing is clearly the most economically important.   In any war, Landing WOULD Be attacked.   To suggest that a single merchant ship could attack and destroy the port so easily and get away so cleanly is simply not plausible.   

Butcher could easily have resolved this problem with some minor changes in the text.   The Marines could have specifically targeted the shore defense batteries and took them out before the mistshark starting firing.   It could have been stated somewhere that this whole mission was a high risk gamble.    No doubt there are other ways to achieve the same outcome.   These elements are not a barrier to the story.  But the fact that Butcher did not spend the extra sentence or two explaining the above is a FLAW in the story.   Logical flaws always make it harder to “live the story” and thus make the book less “good”   



Quote
Also haven't specifically timed everything but main events in whole book is over a couple of days i"d say. There's no time to particularly put the Spire on a war footing never mind that for his own reasons the Spirearch has kept the information suppressed. So who knew ... a handful of people in the spire and the fleet outside it.

I imagine everybody in the Spire knew they were going to be/at war.  An attack on the fleet base would have been very public, very quickly. 






Quote
There's obviously infrastructure in place for such things, but when you've always done everything a certain way, and your society is based on that assumption, there's not going to be much innovation. And if the Spire wanted to divert the power that's already in use, how are they going to rewire the whole Spire (see earlier point about spirestone being less than easily manipulated)?

My question was not WHY not add electricity now.  My question was WHY did the builders not add electrical outlets when the Spire was built when doing so would have been easy.   



As for Iron rot... love it It applies to both sides seriously handicaps armed warfare sets limits makes for interesting world building. I suggest Jim has thought through the implications and is having fun with the problem he has set himself.

My point is that iron rot is too much of a handicap.  It happens too fast and copper plating is too uncertain/limited a defense.  Iron tools/weapons/armor would have very short lifespans in actual combat and thus become astronomically expensive as you must keep replacing your tools/armor.   

222
Cinder Spires Spoilers / Re: Some plot elements just bug me....
« on: January 29, 2016, 11:37:41 PM »
Specifically I mean by the "we" the builders.   I recognize that adding power outlets now would be constrained by the ability of the inhabitants to build power crystals.   Maybe the builders suffered similar constraints, but I doubt the answer is that simple.   

223
Cinder Spires Spoilers / Re: Some plot elements just bug me....
« on: January 29, 2016, 11:35:56 PM »
I will concede that the spires are not floating.   I missed that comment about the prisoners working at the base of the spire.   :(

But it is clear that the spire was built to channel these ethotheic currents and that would not have been done without a reasons.   The power crystals can convert these currents to electricity.   This still means that the question "why did they not put electrical plus all over the spire" is a valid question.   Either "something" prevented them from doing so - or that energy is being used for something else and diverting it to electrical generation is not a good thing.   

Either answer could lead to some very interesting possibilities.   I withdraw this particular concern as satisfied and look forward to the author eventually making it clear :)

224
Cinder Spires Spoilers / Re: Some plot elements just bug me....
« on: January 29, 2016, 08:13:35 PM »


Quote
- Spires do not float. I don't understand the reasoning of "If there is a bottom port, then the spire is not on the ground." There is an entryway at ground level, but it's like having a shipping dock on the ground on a planet where the critters from the Alien movies are having a big Happy Fun Acid-blood Picnic: not conducive to stepping outside for a smoke.

Quote
No, the Spires are firmly rooted to the ground.  Take the Olympian group in the inn in Habble Landing.  They were angry that their rooms had been taken after they had to make a dangerous overland journey to Albion.

Multiple items that imply, but in all honesty do not prove the Spire floats
•   I do not recall any mention of the Olympians traveling overland.  I remember a dangerous ship journey, but the phrase overland was not there.   After all, they arrived at Landing, not somewhere much lower in the Spire.  Nor was there any mention of all of groundside movement.   I totally get it that this is not proof that the spire is flying, but the lack of these comments leaves open that possibility. 
•   There are also MANY references to the surface as someplace very dangerous, very exotic.     
•   The Aurora marines took a highly risky hanger dive into air duct maneuver to get into the Spire.   If the Spire was on the ground, why not attack that way.   It is not like there were a ton of troops on the bottom to fight them off.   It was clear the only major concentration of troops was at the naval base on the top (marines) and the guard was scattered.   Not definitive as the attack approach was stealthy.   
•   There are massive channels of energy flowing through the spires through channels created by the builders.  This is specifically mentioned in the book.   That energy is really the point.  It is there, so why is it there if it is not being used.   Since there are no other obvious uses for that power, a flying Spire is not an outlandish explanation.   

Net, there is not clear evidence of Spires floating, but nothing completely rules it out either.   And there is a lot of energy designed to flow through the Spires that is doing something.  Which was my original point – why are they not using that energy. 




Quote
As for power sources  in the habbles we have lumins [crystals]  the spirestones themselves channel etheric energy  Jim hasn't said that i recollect  what fuel they use to cook for example but could be electricity from an "etheric"source we just don't have the detail. We know there are steam engines they need power to heat water  wood is expensive  no petroleum coal [surface problems] so my money is on electricity generated for public use and to power steam. We have Grimms electric tea pot as an example. Demand and supply!

There was a whole discussion about how the Spire does NOT make electricity available to hubble inhabitants.  And steam engines need heavy fuel, which is clearly expensive to haul.  It is true the lumin crystals could be what consumes that energy, but is just seems inadequate.   




Quote
As for the attack. From memory the admiral of the Fleet [Wilson?] was embarrassed by the sneak attack  that dropped the marines. He ordered the fleet out to form a cordon around the spire so no attacker would get close. But they were already here and he reacted exactly as the Aurorians expected.

Quote
- Habble Landing's port has two important aspects: 1) It took years and years of wearing down the spirestone wall of their habble (spirestone is tough) to put an opening in it. 2) The port structure was added on by the habble and is not made of spirestone. Habble Landing was born as a middleman in the trade between habbles, to provide much quicker shipping between upper and lower habbles (there are no lifts/elevators inside, so they essentially have rudimentary ships that are really little more than lift crystals with big platforms to raise and lower cargo, turning them into the equivalent to freefloating freight elevators); it's a purely commercial venture by one habble, which can easily be vulnerable to the wolf-in-sheep's-clothing sneak attack that happened in the book (if your firepower is all docked and is suddenly under fire while you're sitting there picking your teeth, say bye-bye à la Pearl Harbor). And the fleet defense was unwisely concentrated by the military leadership around the fleet's port at the top, not at Landing.

All this is saying is that the Spire made no effort to seriously defend their 2nd most important port, when they knew and expected an attack.   A port they knew was both very valuable and very vulnerable.    Even placing a few light ships nearby to spot any intruders would have been totally sufficient to block the merchant ship/raider from getting away and would have taken away only a trivial portion of their strength.   Having naval batteries that can deal with a warship is also a no-brainer.   The fact that they did none of this only makes sense if you assume their admiral acted like a complete idiot.   But The Admiral is specifically described as a master at defensive warfare.

This is not pearl harbor.  This is a German q-ship managing to sail into London harbor at the start of WWII and destroying half the city because the British did not bother to create any defenses or base a single warship there.   It is not as if the Spire was not expecting occasional wars. They build a powerful military and have a strong military tradition.   

All I am saying is that the port was far to easy to destroy and that did not make sense.   





Quote
Mistshark was a neutral merchant under a Dolosian flag and already docked. Grimm suspected for his own reasons but no evidence and would the fleet believe him. Knowledge of Marines was not common knowledge and Spirearch kept it secret to flush out the traitor or traitors who could be in the Guard. So no Guard deployment. Just Grimm and his small crew who's orders were to protect and support Ferus and the others. He did what he could when he could. The marines blew up the landing  Mistshark caused chaos by destroying neighbouring ships thus assisting in the escape.  The fleet is miles away looking out not in so relatively easy for Random to dodge the cordon  until of course the Fleet knew it had been fooled again. Await with interest to see the political fallout in the fleet as a result.
Quote
- Grimm is frankly understaffed and under gunned for full interdiction on top of everything else he and his crew are trying to do at that particular moment.

My point was not that Grim could have stopped the Marines, but my point was that there was a lot of things he could have done that would have made it harder on the Aurura marines using that merchant ship as an escape route.   Even manning one gun would have done it or letting the guards know to expect attack when he sent his forces into the tunnels to attack the marines.   He could have blasted marines as they tried to get onto the dock (with powerful naval guns) and really hurt them badly/block access to the landing.   He could have alerted the Landing Guards to expect attack (when he left to attack the Marines) or simply made sure his own ship was ready (ie - powered and shields).  Yet none of those things were done.   Grimm is clearly an experienced and very smart military commander and not taking any action on a very strong suspicion again makes little sense. 



Quote
- Plastics are out of the question; they require petroleum-analog substances and therefore surface drilling in the places where such analogs are. Most ferrous metals are also out of the question for, well, reasons.

Yet the hubble shave access to a lot of iron, a lot of copper, loads of raw materials for vat production of everything from vegetables or beef to crystals, all of theses raw materials have to come from somewhere.   Again, my point was that if iron was such a bad material to use, why did the builders not enable them to produce a better material.   Copper coating iron is a VERY POOR solution.  Think of all that iron armor.  At the end of any battle you have loads of damaged armor, tons of broken iron armor exposed to elements.   There is no way that armor can be repaired and recoated quickly.   A warship could seriously compromise its armor after just one battle and require weeks in the shop to completely replace its armor.  Impractical.   Normally I would not quibble on this, but Butcher spend a lot of time emphasizing repeatedly the fact that iron rusts extremely quickly (24 hours and a sword can be brittle).   If the author does that, he needs to spend the time thinking through the implications. 





Quote
- Getting a message between habbles would involve either an on-foot messenger running up aaaaaaaaaaaaall the ramps between levels or a courier flying outside from Landing to the summit (which, if you don't have a dock, is kind of hard to start).

Quote
Also the Spirearch has his resources witness the rallying of the Habble to putting out the fire etc. He simply was using Ferus et al as his trigger in a long wider game in which risks must be taken.


Yes, but there is a constant stream of barges moving back and forth between all three ports.  It would be easy enough to assign a crewman to hand deliver a message to the Spirearch.   We are talking a time period close to 8+ hours at least between when they first recognized the landing was likely the primary target and when the main attack occurred.  Maybe 20 hours.  A message could have been totally useful/appropriate even though it might have not actually effected the events that occurred in the book.   The whole point of being part of a larger organization is that make reports so your leaders can act to back you up/deal with the mess you find and/or move their resources to where they were needed.   With this information, the spirearch could have concentrated his forces and been more effective, send some naval forces down, or many other things that he could not do without some hard information.    The whole reason the team was sent down in the first place was to get information.





I like butcher as an author. The book is a fun read.  But it does feel that, given such an unusual world, the author did not spend enough time thinking things through in his world building. 

225
Cinder Spires Spoilers / Re: Some plot elements just bug me....
« on: January 28, 2016, 06:03:45 AM »
I believe spires float, which is why they use ships to get to the surface    The book specifically stated that most cargo comes in the bottom or the top ports, but Spire Albion had a middle.   If there is a bottom port, then the spire is not on the ground.   But it is possible I misread things.   But the impression was that there was no ground contact.   If they were on the ground, then at least some housing would extend that way rather than build up the spire.

Send a sealed letter by random messenger.   Almost no risk.   

Pages: 1 ... 13 14 [15] 16