Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Darkling

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6
31
Darkest Hours / Re: New York City inaccuracies
« on: March 23, 2010, 04:42:01 AM »
1. I've seen bent manhole covers. And not by application of heat - merely poorly-placed covers hit by very heavy weight.

Maybe so but that takes several, several, tons, like a truck.  Spidy might be strong but he doesn't have the body mass for it.  It's like a pencil. You know you can break it in half but not if you're only using two fingers.   


Quote
2. As a resident of New Jersey and with a wife who has been commuting to one of three boroughs every weekday for fifteen years from NJ, I'm unfortunately all too familiar with the trains in and out of NYC. I also know a good number of people who commute daily from central (and even southern) New Jersey to NYC for work. Depending on your definition of "unreliable", any of the lines can be called unreliable - most days, they're okay and reasonably on time, but any shared-track train gets less and less sure of being on time the farther it goes from the city. The ACES train, in keeping with this, is okay most of the time but cannot be counted on with any real certainty. And finally, an old friend of my wife's (both of them have lived here all their 40+ years, and her friend has lived in the city his entire adult life) regularly visits family down in AC... and he always rents a car. If there's trouble on a track or in a tunnel, the train is SCREWED. With a car, you at least have multiple options: Holland, Lincoln, GWB, etc. For that friend, it's all about the reliability of having options - if things are going normally, the car option can easily be slower, but if there's a snag, the car HAS options.

Yes, but you have to agree usually trains out of New York City are (at most) only ten minutes late.  It's the trains going into the city that are unreliable.




32
Darkest Hours / New York City inaccuracies
« on: March 22, 2010, 12:07:42 AM »

First let me say I DO like the book. It's a fun read.  But I'm not that far into it and I've already spotted a few things that caught my attention as flaws.

1.      Manhole covers cannot bend.   They handle the weight of several tons a day.  I know Spidy is strong but this is physically impossible and by that I mean breaks the laws of physics.  They'll only bend if heated, otherwise the most you can do (and this is also improbable) is snap and crack. 

2.  Mary Jane wanting a car to get to Atlantic City.   
     Okay.  Most real New Yorkers don't own cars, period.  Not just because they're expensive to maintain but also because of New York City traffic.  Have you ever tried to drive in New York City?  Only tourists are foolish enough to do that.
          The train to Atlantic City from Penn station is NOT unreliable.  And it leaves almost every forty minutes to two hours.  The trains in New York City are more reliable than the trains anywhere else in the state.  Any New Yorker will tell you this.  Getting out of New York City is easy.  It's the trains coming in that tend to get delayed.   The longest delayed train out of New York City I've experienced is forty minutes (that was in an emergency situation).   Usually the Penn station delays are about ten minutes (and for a New Yorker that's a long time).   Now if you're leaving upstate New York to get back down to New York City the delay to get down into the city can be up to five hours.
          I say this as someone who grew up on Long Island just a county out of New York City for the first twenty five years of her life and moved to the rural upper, upper part of upstate New York three years ago and as someone dependant on public transportation.
            Mary Jane broke the illusion of a legitimate New York City resident.  A real New Yorker would know the traffic in the city (if you're going by car) is more of a hindrance and more unreliable to get somewhere on time than any express train out of Penn Station.

             I'm sure I'll find other little flaws but as a New Yorker these grabbed my attention.


33
Display Case / Re: Perfect Casting, part 2
« on: February 17, 2010, 10:36:43 PM »
I didn't know Hugh laurie was that old, doesn't look like it


It's the hair.  If a man dyes his hair people tend to assume he's a lot younger than if he lets it go gray.   A good example of this is Terrence Mann and Tim Curry.  I've heard people say Terrence Mann is like an older Tim Curry but really he's seven years younger than Tim Curry.  It's just unlike Tim Curry he doesn't bother to dye his hair anymore.


34
Display Case / Re: Perfect Casting, part 2
« on: February 16, 2010, 07:23:00 AM »
I like this. xD


Hugh Laurie is kind of up there in age though.   Paul Blackthorne was only thirty five.  Hugh Laurie is fifty one.  That makes him sixteen-years-older than the last man who played Dresden.


35
Display Case / Re: Perfect Casting, part 2
« on: February 14, 2010, 08:35:25 PM »
*grabs head with both hands*

Hugh Laurie as Rum Tum Tugger.  Head asplode.  Ow.

My work here is done. :P




36
Display Case / Re: Perfect Casting, part 2
« on: February 14, 2010, 07:49:38 PM »
Bob-hugh laurie


Here's something strange I stumbled across the other day.




37
DF TV Series / Re: POLL: End Game Opinion of the Series
« on: January 18, 2010, 11:58:10 PM »
You even get a feel for Bob...and how his skull would look and talk.

I honestly don't think that would have worked on TV.  It would have gotten old really fast and no special effect would have made it palletable to non-book fans.  You either have CGI or a skull puppet and it just wouldn't translate well, I really liked the ghost.


38
DF TV Series / Re: POLL: End Game Opinion of the Series
« on: December 16, 2009, 09:17:26 PM »
the only show on that channel i could get my wife to watch....sigh.  this far out and i was still hoping that they would resurrect it.  How long was Family Guy off the air before they brought it back?  I actually got into the books because of the show.  I loved them both.  I dug the interaction between the show bob and harry.   

Syfy (or more likely Lionsgate since Lionsgate has the Internet distribution rights) still has the rights until 2012.  They're just being greedy by not letting anyone do anything with it and at the same time they're being stupid.  They're letting a potential money maker go to waste.

 

39
DF TV Series / Re: POLL: End Game Opinion of the Series
« on: December 03, 2009, 02:15:43 AM »
Lurker comments:

I enjoyed it, and once I knew it had books, I sped off to look for some. Shame it got killed.

Books are way, way better! I just borrow them though. I want my own copies, but they don't sell it in my country, last time I checked a bookstore. Maybe I should check other bookstores... (why oh why...)

You could always buy them off the Internet.

 

40
DF TV Series / Re: POLL: End Game Opinion of the Series
« on: October 08, 2009, 09:42:33 AM »

Still, there's the huge sense of... wanting? ...that remains. A whole lot was left unsaid. I sincerely hope that the TV-verse storylines will be resolved someday.

I know exactly what you mean.  Certain storylines felt unresolved and Robert Wolfe broke his promise to us long ago that if it didn't continue he would reveal those stories to us.


41
Display Case / Re: Things Harry Dresden Is No Longer Allowed to Do
« on: April 16, 2009, 09:51:24 PM »
I will no longer mention the Evil Overlord's list to my enemies. They don't need any more help.

If I have to use Loony Toons characters for inspiration it will not be Wile E. Coyote, Suuper Genius since his plans backfire. The Road Runner & Bugs Bunny are better choices since they kick his butt.

When plotting or attempting to unravel my foes plots especially those of the Black Council or any immortal or near immortal entities, I will remember two phrases Xanatos Gambit and Xanatos Roulette.

Woohoo!  Long live David Xanatos!  The greatest antagonist in cartoon history!

 

42
Display Case / Re: Things Harry Dresden Is No Longer Allowed to Do
« on: April 16, 2009, 10:09:40 AM »

(click to show/hide)


43
Display Case / Re: Things Harry Dresden Is No Longer Allowed to Do
« on: April 16, 2009, 04:00:46 AM »
*points for Darkling*

Hehe.  Thank you.  I just added to it.


44
Display Case / Re: Things Harry Dresden Is No Longer Allowed to Do
« on: April 16, 2009, 03:56:49 AM »
(Semi Turn Coat spoiler one)

(click to show/hide)





45
Display Case / Re: Things Harry Dresden Is No Longer Allowed to Do
« on: March 22, 2009, 06:45:38 AM »
Wow, That was good.

Two more of the same type because I haven't reached the extent of corny yet. :P

Harry is no longer allowed to wander into Thomas' salon and go 'What?  No Mrs. Lovett Meat pies?' or say 'Hey!  This isn't Fleet street!'

Sorry for those who don't get the reference.

 

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6