Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Topics - Mickey Finn

Pages: [1] 2 3 4
1
Author Craft / New Wormwood story in Dirty Magick: New Orleans
« on: April 17, 2015, 10:06:34 PM »
In "All the Pretty Little Horses," Wormwood had just stopped by to listen to the jazz, but Baba Ghede calls in a favor to get him to look into a mass missing persons case.
It just so happens the people that were misplaced happen to have been possessed by the Loa at the time....

http://www.amazon.com/dp/B00W8FE3FS for Kindle. Tradeback out in two weeks.

No prior knowledge or reading of Wormwood required.

2
What do Charlie Brown and Jim Butcher have in common?

A love for Cast a Deady Spell*, a pastiche blend of Lovecraft and hard boiled noir. So the former started a series of collected short stories on this theme.

Quote
Dirty Magick: Los Angeles" is an urban fantasy anthology exploring the crossroads between magic and crime. Set in the city that invented noir, these stories comb the back streets and side alleys where the shadows are so sharp, they can shave you clean. Featuring such distinguished writers as Neal Pollack, Richard Rayner, Justin Macumber and Terry Mixon, this collection, edited by Charlie Brown, presents a whole new approach to urban fantasy

Yes, the editor of the Dirty Magick series is really named Charlie Brown. While the first anthology was set in Los Angeles, the next one will be set in his hometown of New Orleans, so if you're interested in submitting a story, make sure you read the FAQ so you don't fall into the pitfalls of writing about Hollywood's New Orleans. Besides, he has a sense of humor in writing it.

I'm not sure who's confirmed in this one, but I was just accepted, Terry Mixon just announced on his FB page he's working on a submission. I've poked a few awesome writers I know from con circuits who are eyeing the project, tossing ideas around in their heads, as well as SASS members.

He's a huge fan of Jim's, apparently, and so you all share Venn-space of good taste. His instructions to me regarding posting this here:

" I'll take pitches from them until Nov 15 and their deadline would be Dec 31...although unpublished writers need to attach a writing sample." Note that if you're a published author, you need to send him a list of publications (the credentials mentioned in the submissions guidlines)
http://www.luckymojopress.com/submissions/





*For more on this, plus the reason why it's spelled "Magick" in the title of the series, read his intro by going here and choose LOOK INSIDE on the book cover.
http://www.amazon.com/Dirty-Magick-Angeles-Neal-Pollack/dp/0991196007

3
Author Craft / Society for the Advancement of Speculative Storytelling
« on: September 25, 2012, 03:26:59 PM »
http://www.facebook.com/SocietyForTheAdvancementOfSpeculativeStorytelling

Quote
Mission Statement:

The Society for the Advancement of Speculative Storytelling, Inc. is a non-profit organization dedicated to encouraging and mentoring aspiring and new writers of speculative fiction, art, and game design. In so doing, its activities shall include, but not be limited to, keeping its members informed of issues within the field, providing avenues of constructive critique and collegial discussion for its members, and encouraging interest and appreciation for all aspects of speculative fiction in multiple media.

SASS is now starting to open the doors, having recently done all the legal paperwork, and will have membership applications coming up soon (presumably the FB page will have updates!)...many semi-pros are already involved, with some full-time authors eyeing SASS for mentoring and networking. (Including known science fiction and fantasy authors.)
Art & Game design will be lagging behind slightly as SASS was originally conceived for authors*; as such, the board is made up of authors and the artists and the game designers have not joined as yet...but it is open to them! We'll structure those sections as more join.


*Originally SASF, and as such you'll occasionally see language in docs that says "fiction" instead of "storytelling."

4
Author Craft / Why it takes so long for a book to get published
« on: April 25, 2012, 01:37:10 PM »
Quote
Why does it take a year for a book to go from a draft to bookstore shelves? Is it to build anticipation? Because publishers are modern-day Neanderthals, trying to make e-books by rubbing sticks together? Because authors are so precious?

The correct answer is: yes! In more detail, it’s because this*:
* Note: Blog may represent one-sided author’s view of a process he actually knows little about, with gaps in knowledge filled with speculation and lies.

http://www.maxbarry.com/2012/04/24/news.html

5
Author Craft / Writers on Writing: Dead Robots Society
« on: February 28, 2012, 11:33:13 PM »
DRS podcasts of 8 panels from Conjur 2 weeks ago: http://deadrobotssociety.com/2012/02/16/con-jour-4-panels/

ConJour 4 recently took place in Houston, TX, and we are fortunate enough to have eight panels to offer you. We don’t want to flood you with all of them at once, so instead we’re going to release them two per day over four days. Let us know if you like this release method, or if you’d prefer just getting them all at one time.

So now, without further adieu, here we go…

HOW TO START YOUR OWN PUBLISHING COMPANY


Panelists – Terry Mixon, O.M. Grey, Mel White, Chris Dunbar, and David Doub.

CHARACTER DEVELOPMENT


Panelists – Terry Mixon, Chris Dunbar, Michael Ashleigh Finn, Robert Stickmanz, and Alexis Glynn Latner

PLOT DEVELOPMENT 1


Panelists – Terry Mixon, Michael “Talthos” Willett, P.L. Blair, Rhonda Eudaly

PLOT DEVELOPMENT 2


Panelists – Paul Elard Cooley, Mel White, and Charlie Brown.

PUBLISHING AND MARKETING REALITIES FOR THE EMERGING AUTHOR


Panelists – Michael Ashleigh Finn, O.M Grey, Terry Mixon, Rhonda Eudaly, David Doub

TECHNOLOGY FOR WRITERS


Panelists – Scott Padget, Paul Elard Cooley, Michael Ashleigh Finn

THE BUSINESS ASPECT OF WRITING


Panelists – Michael Ashleigh Finn, Rhonda Eudaly, P.L. Blair, and David Doub.

WORLD DEVELOPMENT FOR SCI-FI, FANTASY, AND HORROR


Panelists – Terry Mixon, Robert Stickmanz, Jason Durall, and Chris Dunbar

6
Announcements / Ghost Story Spoiler Rulers
« on: July 14, 2011, 01:13:41 PM »
Please see http://www.jimbutcheronline.com/bb/index.php/topic,27235.0.html for the rules and discussion.

7
Site Suggestions & Support / Mods
« on: February 23, 2011, 02:29:04 PM »
Someone pointed out to me in PM that discussions with Mods are very stressful.


I can understand that, especially seeing the power trips on the internet some people get into.

Something that may help is to remember that we're fans, just like you. There's no "we're mods, we're better than you" attitude at play here. Our whole point is to keep the peace. This board's definition of peace is more peaceful than most of the internet, but that's by the wish of the folks whose house we're in. We're not scouring the boards looking for people to bust, and we do the best to keep things fair and level. We have a policy where anything serious with honest posters (instead of spammers) is discussed to get multiple viewpoints to make sure we're not reading something wrong. Things like that.

Also, bear in mind that attitude towards being modded affects things....if you explain "No, I did not mean it that way, it came out wrong" or somesuch in a conversational, non-threatening tone*, or if you simply realize you got belligerent in a post in the heat of the moment and correct something when we ask you to, we're likely to let water pass under the bridge. (That doesn't mean you have to agree with what we said or you get tossed out....you simply have to follow the rules. So do we. But if you want to disagree with us, just don't turn it into a heated argument. State your case, and we'll likely just start a discussion with you.)

If you don't get along with a specific moderator, ask to speak to another one (although don't do the "Mom said no, so I'll ask Dad" approach...this option is if you feel there's an actual personality conflict)


*I realize we sometimes sound stern when modding. We're not expecting a cowering reply from you, full of scrapping and bowing, the sternness is simply to clarify that we're not kidding...because all of us have huge senses of humor and we don't want any room for doubt that we're in Mod Mode & serious.

8
Author Craft / BUZZY Looking for Authors
« on: February 10, 2011, 09:34:45 PM »

9
Author Craft / Max Barry's 15 Ways to Write a Novel
« on: November 30, 2010, 02:30:16 PM »
Quote
Every year I get asked what I think about NaNoWriMo, and I don’t know how to answer, because I don’t want to say, “I think it makes you write a bad novel.”

This is kind of the point. You’re supposed to churn out 50,000 words in one month, and by the end you have a goddamn novel, one you wouldn’t have otherwise. If it’s not Shakespeare, it’s still a goddamn novel. The NaNoWriMo FAQ says: “Aiming low is the best way to succeed,” where “succeed” means “write a goddamn novel.”

I find it hard to write a goddamn novel. I can do it, but it’s not very fun. The end product is not much fun to read, either. I have different techniques. I thought I should wait until the end of November, when a few alternatives might be of interest to those people who, like me, found it really hard to write a goddamn novel, and those people who found it worked for them could happily ignore me.

Some of these methods I use a lot, some only when I’m stuck. Some I never use, but maybe they’ll work for you. If there were a single method of writing great books, we’d all be doing it.

The Word Target

What: You don’t let yourself leave the keyboard each day until you’ve hit 2,000 words.

Why: It gets you started. You stop fretting over whether your words are perfect, which you shouldn’t be doing in a first draft. It captures your initial burst of creative energy. It gets you to the end of a first draft in only two or three months. If you can consistently hit your daily target, you feel awesome and motivated.

Why Not: It can leave you too exhausted to spend any non-writing time thinking about your story. It encourages you to pounce on adequate ideas rather than give them time to turn into great ones. It encourages you to use many words instead of few. If you take a wrong turn, you can go a long way before you realize it. It can make you feel like a failure as a writer when the problem is that you’re trying to animate a corpse. It can make you dread writing.

(and goes on for 14 more)


http://www.maxbarry.com/2010/11/29/news.html

10
Policies / "The Book of Don't"
« on: September 28, 2010, 01:37:52 PM »
Author's Forward:

"Please note, The Book Of Don't contains actual rules regarding conduct on the forums, these are not "suggestions" nor "Paynesgrey's Helpful Opinions On Forum Conduct" despite the vaguely humorous tone in which they are provided.  Some ideas I come up with when I witness "issues", others come from the other Bartenders and mods as they see problems or attempts at doing an end-run on the standards of conduct.  So I slap together a clarifier/reminder and toss it out there for Them What's In Authority and Such to digest.  Most go right through, although I admit "Don't forget to always capitalize any and all pronouns referring to Paynesgrey, and to preceed any usage of My Name with "His Most Masculine (junior) Moderatorialness, Paynesgrey" was not received with the enthusiasm I'd hoped for.  Win some, lose some.  Later on I'm going to pitch "Don't forget to begin any reply to Paynesgrey with the phrase, "What is thy bidding, my Master?"  Or at least always respond to Me with the phrase "Yes, my Gatekeeper."  

Point being, every item posted here is submitted to The Site Gods for approval, tweaking, massaging, etc.  I am but Their Humble Prophet.  So if you see it in The Book of Don't, well... don't.  




The first part of The Book of Don't was found carved into the skull fragments of an ancient entombed dead person.  The bones showed extensive scorching, and there it was later determined that his tomb was in fact not a grave quarried into pre-deluvian stone, but a big old boot print.  What follows is a rough translation:  

Quote
Gaze up this, the ancient Sage, mighty in his wisdom, strong in his righteousness, examine him carefully, allow yourself to breathe deep of his very essence, to contemplate, to understand him, what it is to be him, to see and smell and hear and taste the world through him.



And then don't be him.

The main purpose of this forum is to discuss and generally roll around in imaginary worlds filled with imaginary people and things.  And to meet new friends who also have imaginary world all over them.  Think about exactly how much impact on your life will result from an arguement about "What is the effect of Tuesdays on White Court Vampires, and is it covered in The Accords?"  Keep things in perspective.  Sometimes we take offense to someone's tone or attitude in a discussion, but at the end of the day, we're arguing about... say it with me... imgainary people in imaginary worlds.  When you find yourself replying machine gun fashion in an arguement, getting pissed at someone, take a day or two off the topic.  The interweb won't spoil, it'll be here when everyone's settled down.  And if it's a topic you're emotionally invested in, by keeping your calm, keeping things civil, you'll help keep the thread healthy, fun, and unlocked.  Jim wants his friends to get along, to be pleasant and respecful to each other.  

Remember that.  I knew a guy who'd get all worked up and shrill and type angry things all the time instead of waiting a bit to settle down.  He burned up in the fire, and then Asthon came and stomped on his head.



Selected passages from the From the Ancient Studies of the Life's Work of the Sage, The Most Transendental Passive Aggressive Sneakety Snears Smugly.  The works provide a cautionary tale of how not to end up like him.

Quote
Don't perform a "Drive By."  

A Drive By is a quick, one liner which either invokes a Touchy Topic, or is just obnoxious, insulting, or demeaning.  "Yeah, what do they expect when they elect republitarianocratic-ists" or "Well, anyone who's not an idiot can see that Thomas can't feed on Mormonoligistarianists on Tuesdays, because the Accords say so."  It's like when a lawyer says something he knows the judge will tell him is out of line, but the damage is done even before he can word his fake apology.  That goes for Lofty Pronouncements, a drive by of the "I think you're not smart enough to realize I'm insulting you and sneering at you, you are a simpleton or morally inferior being."  Things like starting with "Some of us SNIFFFF... happen to believe otherwise and have the proper appreciation for blahblahblahblarffblarffblarfff."  

Cracks like the above might be just one liners, but they're violations of policy and good manners.  

And they are particularly insidious because they tempt the goaded party to respond, splashing more Touchy Topic all over the place.  Troll bait, anyone?  Now, anybody can slip up and say something they didn't intend to be provacative or condescending.  Sometimes our wording creates a tone we honestly didn't intend.  After all, not everyone is blessed with my stunning charisma and simply magnificent diplomatic gifts.  Or my humility.  If you post something and someone takes issue, look at what you said and consider rewording it.  We're not going to take someone out back to play with Old Yeller because of an honest mistake, but we do watch patterns of behavior, and when we see someone making a habit of "honest mistakes" like Drive By jabs, we'll address it.  I knew a feller who posted Drive By's all the time, but he burnt up in the fire, then Ashton came and stomped on him.



More fragments of the text have been recovered during the excavation of what appears to be a the waste pit of a swarm young Moderaptors, providing the following advice:

Quote
Don't supply a Non-Apology when informed you're out of line.  An apology is "I'm sorry, I didn't mean that the way it came out, I'll fix it."  Or "I'm sorry, I was out of line there."  The best way to apologize is to use short, simple words even I can understand.  That way, there's no question about your intent or meaning.

The Non Apology is the "It's unfortunate that you happen to feel offended that I called your wife a bloated warthog, I regret that some people are overly sensitive or unappreciative of the fact that any reasonable person can see that your wife is indeed a bloated warthog."  It's the statement that one clearly isn't actually apologetic about anything other than getting caught, and stands by their original out of bounds behavior but is pretending to be civil.  I knew a fellow who used Non Apologies all the time, but he burned up in the fire and then Ashton came and broke his head.



Quote
Don't fling poo at other authors while your standing on Jim's porch.  

We all have our likes and dislikes.  Chances are most all of us have authors that we dislike.  Some of us have authors who we really, really, dislike.  That's fine.  But DO NOT use this site to go on bashing rampages against this or that author.  It's one thing to say "I couldn't get into Grayson Payne's epic mongo-mega-ology series Diatribes and Digestives, or "I just didn't like his main character."  An honest review or comment is fine, but don't start hate-fests.  This is not a "Jim Fans Against Twilight/Anita Blake/The Three Investigators" website.  It reflects poorly upon Jim when his fans use his officially sanctioned forum to heap snarlsome, venemous screeds of fanboi/grrl book outrage simply because some author somewhere wrote a books some of us don't like.  We want to welcome fans of other works, this tent is big enough for as many fans of as many authors that want to come play with us.  That welcoming sensation is not created by peeing on their shoes just because they like some author that some of us aren't big on. Chances are, fans of other authors are just as fond of those authors as we are of Jim.  And it's a safe bet that most of us would be rather put out if we were visiting another author's site and saw heaps of kvetching, nasty stuff about Jim.  

So let's be respectful of Jim's professional colleagues, as we would wish their fans to be to Jim.

I knew a fella one time who was always using Jim's forum to hate monkey rampage screech about this other author and his fans, and all they found of him was some random sloppy bits and nuggets.  And then he got burnt up in the fire.



Quote
DON'T begin a post that in some form or other boils down to "not to start on a Touchy Topic, but Touchytouchytouchytouchy."  If it's about real world religion, politics, sociological issues that are controversial, just don't.  Fascinating bit of linquistic trivia here:  In my time among the Forumpostah Tribe of the deep Interwebba Jungles, I learned that the phrase "Not to bring up a Touchy Topic" translates quite literally to English for  "I know better than to post this, but I'm gonna go ahead and post it anyway."

One big red, flaming, acid dripping flag is "did someone use this as an election campaign issue?"   And if they did, did someone argue with them?  Did somebody hold a fundraiser for it, and at the same time did someone else held a fundraiser opposing it? If questions like those can be answered "yes", then it you should probably just save it for some other forum.  

Global Warming, I see you there.  No, don't you go slide over and try hiding behind Minumum Wages, Fair Trade, or Global Anyhthingelseism, that'll do you not a bit of good.  Yes,  That's right.  I'm talking to you.  Now git!  

If you have to ask if it's touchy, or preface it by saying "I don't want to go Touchy", then you probably shouldn't be posting it.  If you're really, really, unsure, but really, really, just gotta post it or your going to do unfortunate things to your undergutchies, send a PM to a moderator or bartender.  Say "I think this is ok, but I think it might be Touchy, you tell me."  Maybe it'll be ok, maby not.  Better safe than making us dig a hole in the cold, frozen ground.  Weather's turning powerful miserable for that kind of work, and it makes us cranky.



Quote
Don't forget to tidy up after yourself.  When the Moderators inform you that a post is in violation of the forum's standards, fix it.  Going the House of Urkle and saying "Did I do thaaaat?  Ooopsie!!!" and then just leaving the offending post in place does not correct the problem.  Like unrepaired vandalism, the eyesore remains to insult or offend, and to provoke reply.  This goes for "Drive-by" comments as well as whole posts.  The Mods do have the power to simply blot out the unacceptable post and leave a nice big red Content Deleted For Violation of Forum Policy..  Accruing a number of those big red comments can attach a certain bouancy to your account, making it float closer and closer to the top of certain lists.  People finding their way to the top of such lists can find themselves winning a no-expenses paid vacation from the forum.  

But generally we prefer to treat posters as adults, to give the offender the opportunity to demonstrate their maturity and go back and correct the matter themselves.  So when you're informed that a post or comment is out of line, fix it.



Astoundingly, our experienced team of crack snarkeologists have just this minute translated this ancient text, which will be appearing in every copy of The Book Of Don't.  The translation has been verified as Authentic Don't, We Really, Really Mean It by none other than His Most Bigger Than Me Modness, Mickey Finn.

Quote
DON'T solicit or provide bootleg audio or video through this forum of Jim's Ghost Story Pre-Read at the Fan Dinner.
Jim was nice enough to bend some rules and share some Beta with us at the dinner.  I'm sure that we all wish we could share nicely with our fellow fans, but Jim has specifically asked us not to, at least until the sample chapters are released for the preview.  He did us a good turn, let's not repay him by doing him a bad one.  I know we all want to share and be shared with, but we must respect the wishes of the Founder of The Feast, so please do not make Jim regret what he did for us.  



O, Hai.  Ceiling Moderaptor seez what U did thar.

Quote

 DON'T forget that all of the rules of conduct regarding courtesy, respect, and Touchy Topics apply to the Chat Room.   Our chat is not a quiet, private room you've rented.  That's what your own pesonal email is, or any outside chat you decide to use, like yahoo or FB.  Consider our chat as sitting in the middle of Jim or Fred's side room or porch.  Sure, it's not where most of the party is happening, but the same house rules apply as anybody could wander in at any moment, and because squabbles and issues from Chat are just as likely to get tracked into the rest of the house as they were from out where the Topics dog used to make his deposits.  Frankly, once in a while someone gets the notion that if a Mod isn't looking, TT or rudeness is somehow acceptable in Chat.  The Chat option can only be kept around if we can ensure that it will maintain the same standards of civil behaviour as are applied to the rest of the board.

Chat offers no more expectation of privacy than right here in the open forums, and the Chat system keeps and stores an ongoing log of the chat activity which we can use if necessary, should we witness, or receive complaints regarding chat conduct/topics.  We don't go digging through there just to go fishing, but we will use it if the need arises to look into any complaints.  Having to do so would make us sad.  Don't make us sad.  

So if you wouldn't say it in front of a Moderator, don't say it in Chat.  Take those issues to an outside chat engine if you wish to discuss them... but Touchy Topics and uncivil behaviours are STILL a No Go in this forum's Chat.      

Knew a fellar once who used to chat all the time like he didn't think the Mods could see if they weren't logged in.  Awful, just awful what happened to him after he burnt up in the fire.  It were so bad, that the burnt up in the fire part was the best part of his day, it was.


Quote
Don't forget to keep the cigars, pipes, clove cigarettes, and other such fragrant combustables in the Smoking Lounge.  I used to smoke.  I loved smoking, particularly Djarum clove cigarettes.  And some people just hated the smell of 'em.  So when I was in a bar or club, I usually stuck to the areas formally or informally designated for smokers.  If I started to light one up, and my neighbor asked me not to, I'd take it to an area it wouldn't bother that patron.  Basic, common, courtesy.  And in any decent bar or club, were I to ignore that courtesy, then a large, unpleasant man would doubtless have instructed me on manners.  Likewise, the staff of this forum is prepared to offer instruction should it be required.

In this case, keep the RP stuff in the RP forums or chat channels.  

There's a goodly number of gamers who are into these books. That's why there's a Dresden Files RPG in the first place.  But RP bogs down and clutters the general chat channels and is an irritant when it invades non-RP oriented threads out in the forum.  It's like sitting between the other patrons at a coffee shop and yelling back and forth across their conversations, when there 's a perfectly fine RPG room off to the side.  We've created designated areas for RP chat and playing so people who aren't into it don't have to talk around it.  So please be courteous to your fellow members and use those rooms.  Those RP channels are just one click away when you're in chat, so it's not a grievous and burdensome thing to use them when you want to discuss or play an RP.


Not to start at Touchy Topic, but I'm starting a Touchy Topic...


Quote
DON'T begin a post that in some form or other boils down to "not to start on a Touchy Topic, but Touchytouchytouchytouchy."  If it's about real world religion, politics, sociological issues that are controversial, just don't.  Fascinating bit of linquistic trivia here:  In my time among the Forumpostah Tribe of the deep Interwebba Jungles, I learned that the phrase "Not to bring up a Touchy Topic" translates quite literally to English for  "I know better than to post this, but I'm gonna go ahead and post it anyway."

One big red, flaming, acid dripping flag is "did someone use this as an election campaign issue?"   And if they did, did someone argue with them?  Did somebody hold a fundraiser for it, and at the same time did someone else held a fundraiser opposing it? If questions like those can be answered "yes", then it you should probably just save it for some other forum.  

Global Warming, I see you there.  No, don't you go slide over and try hiding behind Minumum Wages, Fair Trade, or Global Anyhthingelseism, that'll do you not a bit of good.  Yes,  That's right.  I'm talking to you.  Now git!  

If you have to ask if it's touchy, or preface it by saying "I don't want to go Touchy", then you probably shouldn't be posting it.  If you're really, really, unsure, but really, really, just gotta post it or your going to do unfortunate things to your undergutchies, send a PM to a moderator or bartender.  Say "I think this is ok, but I think it might be Touchy, you tell me."  Maybe it'll be ok, maby not.  Better safe than making us dig a hole in the cold, frozen ground.  Weather's turning powerful miserable for that kind of work, and it makes us cranky.




Additional verses will be provided as our crack team of Snarkeologists get annoyed and puts them together.

11
Announcements / NO SPOILERS IN THREAD TITLES
« on: September 03, 2010, 12:00:04 AM »
People are forgetting this rule. Please remember it. It doesn't matter if it's in the Spoilers section, there are still no spoilers allowed in the titles...because that title could potentially be seen on the main page.

Also, remember to use spoiler tags where appropriate and to put [SPOILERS] in the title.

12
DF Comic Books / The Next Issue
« on: June 18, 2010, 01:03:39 PM »
Just received confirmation from Rich (the project head at Dynamite) that I can share that the issue is going to the printers and should be on the shelves in a couple of weeks...soon as he has a confirmed store date he'll let us know!


(This post is stickied and named in such a way that this is news/comments about the next issue...whatever it is. When that issue comes out, please make any comments/discussion in a new post you or someone else created and leave this thread open for news on The Next Issue.)

13
Author Craft / ONLINE-ONLY Writer's Events
« on: May 16, 2010, 03:59:37 PM »
Changing this to a one-stop place to post things like this.

http://coyotecon.com/

Priscillie turned me onto this about 30 mins ago. Free online writer's con, every weekend in May!

(No relation, despite the Coyote)

14
Author Craft / It's Shakespeare's Birthday
« on: April 23, 2010, 02:42:28 PM »
Go out and be kind to your words.

15
DF Reference Collection / Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
« on: March 26, 2010, 04:54:17 PM »
Jim has not responded to this topic,  However, I spoke with him at Marscon and told him how I had gone through the whole post and sellected several that I liked after going through everything else I can find that he has said about the series, and asked if he was willing to go over them in an e-interview format and he said he liked that idea, but to wait until after the GS signings were over.  The topic was moved here to give me a chance to go over the questions that have been asked since Marscon. -Serack

Part One:
http://www.jimbutcheronline.com/bb/index.php/topic,631.0.html

Part Two:
http://www.jimbutcheronline.com/bb/index.php/topic,10529.0.html

Quote
Since Jim is not monitoring the boards due to writing crunch times, I thought I'd create a thread specifically aimed at him to check when he can, in order for some questions to avoid being buried in time.

However, we have to be careful and not flood this thread with random questions. So, rules of this thread:

1) No questions obviously aimed at plot points that will be revealed later, such as "Who is the girl Marcone's protecting?" or "What really happened at Arctis Tor before Harry arrived?" or "Who is Cowl under the hood?" This can be a fine line, depending on the question. For instance, "Does Murphy know how to use those katanas, or are they just decorative?" does not violate this rule and will be allowed. Jim may not answer it, of course. Jim may not answer any of these questions.

2) Nothing personal, in this thread. This is for Dresden Files questions, only. If he deviates, well, he's allowed.

3) Don't discuss or derail the thread. If you want to discuss something he's said, make your own thread and quote him.  He can come in that thread and discuss it with you...the point of this thread isn't a one-stop shop for all things Jim, but simply a place where he can see  questions and answer them. If we get into discussions, this thread will wander all over the place (something I normally don't mind, but this thread is an exception).

4) Please do your homework before asking a question...see if you can find the answers elsewhere, first. Unlike some, I do not mind when someone new to the boards asks a question that's been discussed to death, but if an answer is readily answerable elsewhere, then it's a waste of breath in this particular thread. Please also note that there's a FAQ forum near the top of this board. At the time of this writing, it's a tad threadbare, but it is growing.

Two things to remember from the above quote:

1) This is a thread started by the mods to give Jim a place to see questions. He may not answer anything here. The man's busy! This thread is an attempt for him to easily find things. Please do not be offended if he doesn't answer a question you posed.

2) Remember not to discuss things here (answering someone's question because you KNOW the answer...not just your opinion of the answer...is allowed. But discussion in this thread only kills the purpose of this thread, which is to allow board members a place to ask Jim a question about this series without him having to wade through tons of discussion. This does not mean things can't be discussed! We welcome discussion....on other threads. (Exception...if Jim tries to have a discussion with you on here, go ahead. His decisions trump everything else, with the possible exception of Iago's administrative tasks.)

This whole thing started as my own attempt to make it easier on Jim. This was not his design.

Jim has not responded to this topic, see note at the top as to why it is in this section.  -Serack

Pages: [1] 2 3 4