Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - g33k

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 180
1
DF Spoilers / Re: Can we see Rudy take up a sword
« on: December 17, 2025, 06:16:02 PM »
What is scary is a lot of people, won't question it. 
Absolutely.
Doesn't much matter, for stuff like pop fiction.

But RL issues are getting buried under extremely-realistic AI slop, too; and people are giving it credence...

2
DF Spoilers / Re: Can we see Rudy take up a sword
« on: December 16, 2025, 06:10:46 PM »
... the A.I. gave me this:
------------
<SNIP>
-----------------
This wasn't in the copy of Battleground that I read ...

Classic AI hallucination:  include a light dusting of genuine references, but placed in incorrect contexts for a surreal result.

3
DF Spoilers / Re: List your top 5 Dresden files books
« on: December 14, 2025, 06:48:26 PM »
This list varies depending on my mood sometimes ...

Same.
Except for me, most of the time not just "some."

My top-most favorite book is whichever came out most recently, which lasts for about 6ish months.

Most of the rest of the time, it's whichever I'm currently re-reading (which most-often is whichever my wife is currently listening-to in audiobook format (I often listen with her)).

Occasionally, it's a small&scattered collection of books, when I'm cross-referencing clues to assemble/verify/test a WAG.

 

4
DF Spoilers / Re: Can we see Rudy take up a sword
« on: December 14, 2025, 06:31:36 PM »
... It was a warning, Harry took it as a warning, Harry was ashamed and didn't forget.  In other words a strong warning, and then Harry went on to try and redeem himself.  That's the point ...
No; the point is that Angels don't do that.

They do not "step in" that way, not even to "warn:"  not with an unambiguous Angelic-caliber "thou shalt not," not to influence mortals' free will.

That the Sword did burn Harry can only be a "warning" that a Spookyside "bad actor" is acting upon Harry; that his free will isn't entirely his own.  A free-willed mortal choice does not get an Angelic response or intervention.

... Or very realistic, between his adrenalin and the Winter Knight's mantle Harry wasn't going to come to his senses that easily or quickly after seeing his beloved murdered and bleeding out in his arms.

Hypothetically, the WK-mantle influence may indeed be sufficient to get a KotC/Angelic intervention.

...

Maybe...

But ...

1/ But also, nope -- Harry already made that choice, and now has to live with the consequences.  When he chose to take on the WK-mantle, Harry chose chose to eventually become a monster.  The Angels (once again) do not intervene/warn when mortals have made their choice.  You might argue that some mortal may have been "tricked" into taking up a Knight-mantle without understanding how it could mess with their head; but Harry knew it would happen, fully accepted that it would (as it turns out, he has a slim chance not to become a monster!).

2/ But also, why both(all) of the Knights?  We really don't see more than one KotC stepping into a fight for "just any" supernatural threat; and as "threats" go, a faerie Knight isn't exactly top-tier!  The most-obvious answer to "why are all the KotC's in that fight?" is "because they are fighting the KotC-archfoe, the Denarians."

= = =

I want to reiterate, here, that my "Denarian Hypothesis" here is actually my #2 choice, not my #1.

I think "it was just the WK-Mantle (with no Denarians) that triggered/enabled the Sword to act" is a better argument.  .. but also, I think there is a decent argument -- with supporting Dresdenverse lore -- to make a solid case for a Denarian Shadow to be involved.

5
DF Spoilers / Re: Can we see Rudy take up a sword
« on: December 13, 2025, 07:12:34 PM »
... It wasn't angels that stopped Harry in that moment, it was his very human friends who stopped him, true they were better equipped, but in the end it was his very human friends risking injury to stop their very upset, but powerful and dangerous friend from doing something he'd regret later, and in the end harm their cause ...

Yes, his friends were there, and worked to stop him... risked themselves to stop him!

But the angelic power of Fidelacchius came to bear against Harry... and that doesn't happen for mortals making purely-mortal choices.  The fact that Fidelacchius' miraculous powers manifested:  this says that the supernatural is misbehaving in that scene; that mortal free-will is compromised (and/or that mortals are facing supernatural might, that mortal flesh and bone alone cannot match)

And the fact that both (aka "all" at this point) the knights took to the field... that's more ambiguous, but a good reason to at least suspect the culprit is Denarians; that I can recall, the only other multi-Knight action we've seen was later against Ethniu herself (who solo'ed against Mab+Odin+WhiteCouncil)... and previously, against Denarians.  I repeat that the WK mantle is "enough" supernatural influence to justify a KotC involvement; I think it more-likely.  We don't have to demand Denarian presence... but.  There is that niggle...

It just gives me pause:  nothing called for Jim to write it that way.  Harry could have looked down at a fallen and bleeding Sanya, and come to his senses... without bringing in Butters, or Fidelacchius.  He could have had Butters show up, and not use Fidelacchius.  It would have been a much more "human" moment; but Jim specifically invoked the Angelic.

6
DF Spoilers / Re: Can we see Rudy take up a sword
« on: December 12, 2025, 03:06:12 AM »
  Yeah, I read that way more in the save Harry from himself sense - "against" is not really applicable.  The faithsaber burned him to *warn* him, after all.

Yes... exactly!  The faithsaber's angelic powers activated.

Again and again, we see Uriel explaining that purely-mortal actions and purely-mortal choices do not give the Angels any scope to act.

Nicodemus' cadre of "Squires" shot up Michael's house, broke in, grabbed Charity, put Uriel's mortal form at risk (with no Grace to save him!), while a bunch of literal guardian Angels stood by and did ... nothing.  Because the Squires were all mortals, acting with enough "Free Will" to be beyond Angelic intervention.

If it were just "Harry being Harry" -- mortal, fallible, flawed -- the Angel wouldn't have given Harry the slightest bit of discomfort.  The Angels don't stop mortals from mortally screwing-up.  The pain was a clear demonstration that, justified as his rage may have been, it wasn't just Harry being Harry; Harry was being influenced.

... I'm not sure I buy the part about intense anger indicating Harry still has a shadow attached to him after all, either.  He got a lot colder than when Lash was torqueing his temper, real quickly.  Seems more Winter mantle behaviour...
TBH, I agree with you.  Harry's symptoms were more "Wintery" than "Hellish," and we know the Knights might have a particular interest in opposing the Denarians... but they'll stand against pretty much any/every supernatural threat.

An enraged Winterknight certainly qualifies (and justifies the Angelic action)!

I  consider the "Lasciel's Shadow" theory a 2nd-choice to the "Winter Mantle" one, but also:  why not both?  I'm quite certain Lasciel knows how Faerie and Winter and Knightmantles work, and her Shadow likely knows how to work with "cold wintery rage."  Deception isn't "second nature" to the Fallen, it's their first nature!

And, I repeat a critical point:  not one but two KotC's, 100% of the Swords in-play, were came to stop Harry; who was, in the end, merely a Knight of Faerie.  Any one KotC could likely have stopped the Winterknight.  Both of them taking the field?  That hints more-than-gently at Denarian influence.

So (despite it being my "second choice" here) I find the Shadow not at all a distant second!

... My read on the scene was something powerful and knowledgeable, probably one or both of the Fallen, manipulated Rudy's mind ...
I don't think malign influence upon Rudy allows Angels to act to stop Harry.  I point again to the Squires invading Michael's home:  those Squires certainly were under Nicodemus & Anduriel's influence; but the Angels still permitted the attack on Michael's home, and for Charity to be abducted.

But honestly, my take on Rudy was that he was indeed "just being Rudy:" cowardly, panicked, deep in denial about the existence of magic, stressed to the edge of sanity because he's experiencing magic with his own senses and still refuses to believe.  And really crappy trigger discipline.

We've seen all of this before from Rudy.  And yes, this is perhaps the worst we've ever seen it... but then, the situation is the worst he has ever seen:  an actual supernatural army is invading Chicago!

I don't think it takes the whispers of a Shadow (or other supernatural influence) to explain any of shitty things Rudy does.

7
DF Spoilers / Re: Can we see Rudy take up a sword
« on: December 11, 2025, 12:08:29 AM »
... would have, if not for the intervention of two KotC (hmmm...) 
^^^ Yeah, this ^^^

Two KotC's -- the only two Swords with wielders! -- are there in one scene, one fight...
taking the field against Harry Dresden.

The Knights whose main purpose is to oppose Denarian corruption, specifically.

Tell me again how we can be so certain that Lasciel's Shadow is gone from Harry...?

Not "Lash," but Lasciel's Shadow...
 
... nearly corrupted Harry into committing a wrathful cold-blooded murder ...
<flips back through books>
<looks for last time Harry was having, not just "anger," but out-of-control anger issues>

Huh... when the Shadow was influencing Harry without his realizing it, that's when.

= = =

My theory here is that the "imprint" of Lasciel takes some time to spawn a "Shadow" to interact with the mortal Host.

But that the imprint of the Fallen Angel is still there, having watched Harry actually redeem the Shadow into "Lash."  And it's still working on it's original mission; because it never actually interacted with Harry... never got changed by him.  So it's beginning to stir, again... this rage might be the sign of a newly-forming Shadow.
 

8
DF Spoilers / Re: Does anyone think Harry isn’t the original Merlin?
« on: December 10, 2025, 11:59:15 PM »
... We already have hints that Harry is one of the legendary Starborn ...
I'm pretty sure we have more than "hints" of this!
I think it's an established part of the canon.
 

9
DF Spoilers / Re: If you can have just one question answered....
« on: December 10, 2025, 11:41:12 PM »
I know a lot of people have wondered about who cowl is. Some people wondered who was driving the car that hit Harry. Others have wondered many other things. If you can have one question answered in 12 months what would it be? ...
I think my biggest curiosity has to be around the whole "Starborn" thing.

I don't really think 12M is the place where we'll learn that, however.  We know LtW and RS are both potential "tutors" / info-sources, but I think that's too much an outside-Chicago story-arc, when the book is heavily about Harry leaning-into becoming "the Wizard of Chicago" more fully.

I think (I've shared this theory here before) that a huge part of Mab's motivation, in ordering the marriage, is to aim her Starborn Winternight at the  Nemvector  lurking within the White Court.  Papa Raith is known to have amassed a substantive library on the Outsider/Starborn apocalypse-cycle, and I think Harry will get at least some peeks into that (a secondary element in Mab's planning:   she knows of the library, wants her Winterknight better-equipped as an anti-Outsider weapon, and "knowledge is power.") ... I am hoping/expecting we'll learn at least some snippets from an arc on this topic.

I suspect Bonea has a goodly bit of Starborn info... but I think Jim will dribble out the Starborn info slowly (into and throughout the BAT) so we won't get to the "Angelic-level" secrets known to Bonea this soon.  So, Bonnie will still be in "figuring things out" mode, and likely unable to give Harry useful info there.
 

10
DF Spoilers / Re: If you can have just one question answered....
« on: December 10, 2025, 11:25:22 PM »
  If murdered, who murdered Malcolm Dresden?  I know about ten more questions follow that.

My bet is that it was Lea (or maybe Mab) -- he died with a peaceful smile, so it was someone who brought images of Margaret with them.  Mab passed (at least for a while) as human (Ms. Sommerset) to the very-clued-in and very-suspicious Harry Dresden; so we know she can sustain such deceptions for a while.

11
DF Spoilers / Re: Harry Dresden's New Apprentice!!?!
« on: December 10, 2025, 11:20:57 PM »
... If the apprentice was straight human it would be a pissing match with the WC because Harry isn't part of the wc anymore. And you know that the merlin would make it a "public" complaint to Mab ...
It's not like Harry's gonna "register" his new apprentice!  The WC has already proven itself unable to track down newly emerging potential apprentices; how closely can they afford to watch Harry?

But then... Harry's still a mortal, and a wizard.  Mab will ask, "Are you claiming, as the White Council of Wizards and signatories of the Unseelie Accords, that you have authority over my Winter Knight?"

Because ultimately, that's the claim the WC would be making:  that they're in charge of what Harry does/doesn't do (that Harry doesn't get to have/train an apprentice).

That claim isn't likely to carry much weight when Mab shows up wearing black.

... Maybe (thought I don't think it is) Thomas's sister has talent and can't sit on the sidelines even though she didn't turn. That's the kind of thing Jim likes to do to Harry. It would give Harry something to feel guilty about how Thomas will react if he ever gets him back
Ooooh, Inari!  That's another interesting option!
I like it, indeed.

I still think Fitz fits better.  We know he has some level of magic.  I like Harry looping back to him, to give him a bit of testing & training... but eventually passing him off to Morty as the better teacher for Fitz's talents (and this giving him the idea of leveraging the Paranet (and the array of minor talents & sheer number of clued-in observers therein) in an organized fashion to find/train new & emergent talents & prevent them from turning warlock).
 

12
DF Spoilers / Re: Harry Dresden's New Apprentice!!?!
« on: December 04, 2025, 04:50:07 PM »
Yes, the Shadow did in my opinion, the Shadow was Lasciel in Harry's head...

The Shadow wasn't actual Lasciel, nor Lasciel's presence.

It was a construct; built by Lasciel, but then independent & disconnected from the Fallen angel.
 

13
DF Spoilers / Re: Harry Dresden's New Apprentice!!?!
« on: December 04, 2025, 04:40:19 PM »
You have to understand, it's implied from what Lash said at the end of White Night that she (and by extension Bonnie) has a great deal of information that is integral to the metaplot and can't be revealed just yet because it would make Harry's life to easy.

So instead she gets to be a genius with all the answers that is simultaneously too dumb to realize she has to hand them out until the last 3 chapters of whatever book they become relevant in.

...

Like, she has to be useless, or we don't get a story.

I think this is exactly correct.  Harry has to be kept ignorant, or he cannot be the investigator-protagonist.


... Just as an example, she 99% knows all about what a starborn is, she can probably tell Harry exactly what Nick's been up to, may well have a bunch of information about what the Black Council has been up to...
I don't think it's at all certain that Bonea knows everything Lash knew... but if she knows just half of what the Shadow knew, that'd be a huge trove of new data for Harry!  I kind of think Lash knew she could only send part of herself forward as Bonea, and tried to curate for Harry to have access to the most-useful bits; but OTOH there's also the likelihood that there may have been too much chaos & unpredictability to the event, and Lash couldn't control things completely that way.

I'm pretty certain that Lasciel's Shadow knew vastly less than what Lasciel herself knew!  The "Shadow" is an imprint within a mortal mind:  I don't think Angelic-scale knowledge fits in there!   ;D

But, as for finding out Nic (and Anduriel's) actions/agenda:  Bonea can only know what Lash knew, who can only know what Lasciel knew.  And we already have seen secrets & infighting between the Denarians... I'm pretty sure there are exactly zero other Denarians who have an accurate understanding of Anduriel's plans.

14
DF Spoilers / Re: Harry Dresden's New Apprentice!!?!
« on: November 30, 2025, 04:09:48 AM »
... We are told that Bonnie has all of Lasciel's knowlege, and Harry's as well ...
Yeah, about that, too...

Absolutely not all of Lasciel's -- not a literal Fallen Angel -- maybe all of the Shadow's knowlege.

But I don't recall ever seeing a definitive "...all of..." statement:  a lot of the knowledge, sure.
But if Jim took (for example) biology/DNA as the model, Bonnie will have a largely-randomized half-from-Lash and half-from-Harry (Lash probably was able to organize which "half").

But I'm pretty sure Bonea won't suddenly become (for example) Harry's Guide to the Starborn Phenomenon; I do expect she'll have some highly-pertninent Starborn-relevant info, though!
 

15
DF Spoilers / Re: Out lawn cover and preorder
« on: November 30, 2025, 04:05:14 AM »
... Yes, I think this may be the first cover where Harry isn't wearing a hat! ...
I suspect it's because it's a new publisher.  "The Law" and "Out Law" don't use Roc/Penguin.  I presume it's just easier all-round not to step on the toes of the artist who does all those novels, and their contract with Roc, etc etc etc.

Better -- as Jim isn't using those channels -- to do something wholly-different (I'm kind of hoping for Mirror Mirror to have a two-Harry cover, one hat-Harry & one hatless).

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 180