Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Maiafay

Pages: [1] 2
1
Author Craft / Re: Fanfiction - Good or Evil?
« on: March 16, 2007, 03:30:09 AM »
Good sites are hard to find; a lot of the really good ones (quality fic & friendly atmosphere) are often specific to a single fandom.
Don't bother with ff.net, they have no standards; if slash isn't your thing, the field of available quality sites is even narrower.
Open Scrolls (scribeoz.com) is good (and all het), and just opened up from an LotR-only to multi-fandom (including Firefly, DrWho and other v. good shows); they are open to new writers but have standards, and guests can read all but the NC17 stuff ;D



FF.net may not have standards...but you can find some of the best plot-driven stories there...you just have to look.

2
Author Craft / Re: Fanfiction - Good or Evil?
« on: March 16, 2007, 03:28:42 AM »
im sorry if i offend you... but i have never gone on a website with fan fiction and left happy :-\




it sucks...honestly sucks


Then maybe you are browsing in the wrong categories? I don't think my stories particularly suck...and I've been told they are well-written--barring a few typos here and there. I have no idea where you are looking or what fandoms you're browsing, but there are good stories out there. 

3
Author Craft / Re: Oh crap - I'm stuck...
« on: March 07, 2007, 04:38:20 PM »
Yeah, it's the climax.  But I got the resolution pretty much nailed down, so that helped me sort through what should happen in the climax.  Of course, now that I've gotten some stepping stones to jump to, I haven't written in a couple of weeks.  Stupid irony. 

I got stuck right when I went on my vacation from work, so I had all that free time and hardly wrote anything.  It's a damn shame.


Glad you got yourself back on track. I usually already have the ending in mind and sometimes even written out beforehand. It's the "middle" I have issues with...and usually drive myself nuts on how to bring it together. I read Jim Butcher's Big Swampy Middle on his LJ...and it's helped some. Good Luck.

4
Author Craft / Re: Fanfiction - Good or Evil?
« on: March 06, 2007, 03:21:33 AM »
For me, most fanfic is pure crap.  I can say that because I used to write crap, and know it when I have the misfortune of coming across it.

That being said, if you are going to write it then follow these rules:
1.  Use secondary characters that never get fully developed
2.  Avoid slash unless you want to die a firy death
3.  Show it off for about a week, then burn it
4.  Afterwards, never write any more fanfic

Not to be mean...but all because you used to write crap...doesn't mean everyone does. I don't consider my work crap, and neither do the folks that read it. I've seen stories that actually outdo the original author, and can tell the writer will probably be published someday. I've read authors that dabbled in fanfic at one point of time. However, I did see you said "most" fanfic...which is why I'm not "really' ranting. But...

1. Secondary characters are very developed in my work...in fact, I revised a story to flesh out all OC secondary characters MORE than what I had.
2. Slash is an acquired taste...not everyone likes it--but many do. As long as it's handled well...and realistic, then I have no issue with it--and prefer it.
3. As for showing it off--been showing it off for around two years now...and learned a lot from reviewers and constructive feedback.
4. Maybe, maybe not...depends if I ever get published. If I do...then I'll have that to occupy my time instead of stomping across another's Sandbox. Till then however...

I'm assuming you're joking...but if you aren't...then you haven't looked hard enough through the crap to find the gems.

5
Author Craft / Re: Is your character a Mary Sue?
« on: March 06, 2007, 01:45:54 AM »
Please, tell us how you really feel.  ;)

Actually, I agree with you here. The idea that a character has to conform to a certain set of rules to be considered a viable character is bogus. For me, there are two ways I approach characters. For the "main, main" characters (yes, this is how I classify my characters, hence failing almost every writing class I took), you build a character that you know you can keep interesting for however long the story is. That means no characters that are boring, whether they be a Sleepy Boo (great name ;D) or a Mary Sue. But it's not the rules that make these characters, it's the authors. Any character can be dull in the wrong hands, just as any character can be brilliant in the right hands. For my "kinda main" characters, they're built more to fit the story than in and of themselves. Again, the only rule should be that they fit the story and are interesting. No place-holders, and no blatant deus ex machina characters popping up. Things like talking heads are fine, if you can make them more interesting than a straight data drop. Bob's a perfect example of this; he reveals key information, but has a wonderfully twisted way about him that makes him great. So for the character you wrote, for example, the only things that should have mattered was did he fit the story, and was he interesting? If yes, he's fine, regardless of who he's related to.

That would make an interesting writing challenge, you know. How many Mary Sue rules can you break with a character and still keep him/her fresh and interesting? I might try it some day...


I have half a mind to do that myself...just to prove a point...

LOL, me and my "point proving." It gets me in trouble...

6
Author Craft / Re: Is your character a Mary Sue?
« on: March 04, 2007, 02:47:43 PM »
Quote
That's exactly how I feel. When I write fanfiction with original female characters, lately I've just given up and taken to making them villains because I don't feel like dealing with the "KILL THE SUE!!!" reviews.

In my experience you can't even have a female character that's a skilled warrior without someone screaming Sue. And a female character in a relationship with the main character is a big no-no. That drives me crazy. Now, by themselves someone may not complain, but heaven forbid you have a female warrior that happens to be in a relationship with a cannon character.

I know what you mean about how they are mean to authors that are probably quite young. You know those sites that go through and tear a fanfiction story apart? Whilst claiming the author mentally handicapped? Well, when I wrote and posted my first fanfics when I was 10. Not knowing any better, my character was a bit of a Mary Sue. My story was put on this livejournal account and flamed, terribly. I was just a kid for crying out loud, of course the story was crap! That's part of the reason I'm so scared of making a character that's a Mary Sue.

However, your story is unique from the standpoint that I find reviewers tend to be more lienient toward male OCs.

I'm just curious, what's your definition of Mary Sue?

~She-Wolf
Okay, this will be long. In my defense, I only did this to prove a point.

Here are some links first off: Great if you want to see mob behavior in action and see how nasty people can be when it doesn't concern them. Yes, my deleted posts are there as well, someone took screen caps (who I found out later was one of my friends on my friends list on LJ. Ain't that nifty?)

My stupid mistake
my stupid mistake continues

Now, you are probably wondering what on earth possessed me to make a sock puppet and then post my OC on both Marysues and oc_analysis when I should have been confident in my reviews and feedback to know “Daniel” WAS NOT a Gary Stu.

A troll did it. Yep, one lousy troll--who I think was a friend of one author I flamed for having a Sue. I used to do that--flame sues, post them on groups, have a good laugh. I never realized how mean and cruel these things are to people until I was on the other side of that line.

Anyway this troll posted on Blood Ties (silent Hill fandom) on Fanfiction.net and I did the wrong thing and responded to them...as did my reviewers. Then I got worried that maybe Daniel WAS a stu--and with a huge brain fart--posted him on analysis under my real account, and then at marysues under a hastily made sock puppet. I just wanted to prove that people would take what my sock puppet said at face value and they wouldn't read the story for themselves (even when I posted Mary Sues, I always read the story. The author's skill level plays a huge part in characterization).

So, I received unfavorable feedback, particularly from two teenage girls, farla and redcoast over on lj. (They stay out of my way now...since I tore them to pieces when they approached me on my own lj during the fallout--my Lj is my turf, no one insults me there! So let’s just say again…they stay away from me now. ) Who decided it would be neat to not only insult me, but to correct my grammar on my PROFILE. Yeah...

I  realized after posting on oc_anaylsis, that “my” version of Mary sue: Someone who is perfect, beautiful, powerful, makes canon characters OOC, and has the personality of a muddle puddle on flat concrete, was not the same as everyone’s. Elitists, those who DO make the laundry lists and label and basically want your OC’s as boring as possible (and to NOT be the main character as I have Daniel from Blood Ties) This is unrealistic, and frankly a waste of time. If you don’t like the OC, them click the back button. But no, they must belittle and be rude… and act superior to anyone who is insecure enough to post on those groups.

I also realized, that no, people DON’T read the story in question. They want to giggle and point, and if they actually read the story--they might not be able to do that. I purposely, under my sock puppet, only put half the details about Daniel--so that people would HAVE to read to get the full scoop on him. They did not, so I lost my temper and revealed who I was (bangs head on desk) thus igniting the entire flame war.  I may have proved my point, but they were all pissed off that I HAD proved my point.

I deleted all posts to remove the source of the flames--since everyone was beyond critiquing and more interested in calling me names and insulting me. I did not run away like my so-called friend said a month later when she “confessed” she was the one who posted me on fandomwank.  I did the exact opposite.

I made a public apology (yes even to farla and redcoast when they didn’t deserve it) to everyone who I got nasty with; apologized to all authors that I had sporked and flamed. Went back and deleted those posts--and went back and re-reviewed with better crits. I also stayed on Marysues and oc_analysis and stayed very VISIBLE--offering advice to people they jumped on from a more neutral and well-meaning standpoint. I also made a guide on helping authors on how to round out their Original Characters. My former friend claimed I ran away--I think not. 

I had made my bed and lied in it. I learned my lesson, and am wiser now to how people are, and more confident in my opinion of a Mary Sue. Now I go, and when applicable, review “Sues” that are sporked everyday, and give them a better critique rather than the flames and rudeness they receive automatically. I also get in people’s faces when they spork a Sue whose author is 14 or younger. There is no need for that. It’s common sense that you don’t pick on a child. It pisses me off every time I see it, and I actively pursue those little bastards that enjoy hounding them.  I’ve also noticed since I spoke up in the analysis group, more people who are like me are voicing their opinions to counteract the few who are asses.  Like me, they don’t see a reason you must make your OC as plain and uninteresting as can be. There’s no need for it. Balance your writing and keep it real. All characters, even canon have strengths, weaknesses, quirks, families, memories, motivations, goals, fears, etc., etc. In fanfic and in original stories: make them beautiful, give them cool names, let them have relations with canon characters--but keep them real. That’s all that should be addressed.

I’m sorry they flamed you…but you shouldn’t let that stop you from doing what you want, or writing what you like. Screw whoever flames you or can’t talk with respect. They obviously have nothing better to do with their time than bitch--and they aren’t worth a second glance. If you want, give me links by PM and I'll take a look at your stories...seriously, stop making OC villians (unless you want to) and make what you want!

Funny thing though, during all that crap--my story received plenty of hits…but no flames. If it were so awful, why not flame me?

Oh yeah, took that test at the beginning of this thread…and Daniel scored a 20. 

7
Author Craft / Re: Is your character a Mary Sue?
« on: March 04, 2007, 03:13:19 AM »
I've seen Star Buck in action, and HELL no, she isn't Mary Sue...

This is a topic that really gets under my skin because frankly, I had posted one of my OC's on a live journal analysis group, and gave samples of the fanfic in question. They tore him apart not based on prose, or my skill level, but on the fact I made him related to one of the "canon" characters and reasonably attractive. It escalated to a flame war when I didn't go with what they "suggested" and I pulled the post. It did not matter how well I wrote him, as far as they were concerned, related to canon character=Sue. Which is bullshit. Same as those tests. And it pisses me off that people on these groups will make it a point to be as rude and demeaning to the author as they possibly can. Hello, all because you can't see the person, doesn't give you the right to behave like an ass. Some of these authors that they pounce on (or 'spork' as they call it in the fanfic world), are like 14, 13 years old. WTF?  It's picking on a kid. There's no reason for it....

Anyway, I stay with those groups so I can smack them every once in a while when "critics" go off on a character for having purple hair, or having a "cool" name. And god forbid anyone is 'related' to anyone else...

Apparently, you have to heap dust on original characters and give them ridiculous flaws just to make them REAL.

*massive eye roll*

8
Author Craft / Re: Problem with passive verbs
« on: February 27, 2007, 02:34:24 AM »
I struggled with this for a long while, until I 'was' critiqued--until a friend critiqued me on that problem.

I also have Stephen King's "On Writing" which helped me tremendously. I will provide a link to a tutorial I did...it's nothing 100%, but it's what helped me.

Now...I have a problem with too much active voice, and need to chill a little on omitting all passive. Passive is good in some instances...and shouldn't be taken away completely. I've caught Mr. King using it more than he implies...

Linky:

Passive Voice

Just a note on the above link...it's a fanfiction site, and the examples I use are from fanfic...so, just a warning. 

9
Author Craft / Re: Is your character a Mary Sue?
« on: February 25, 2007, 05:43:35 PM »
Crap. I have to figure out which character to use on that silly test.
'cause I have about twenty or so which I use regularly.
Okay. I'll just use my crazy rapist/serial killer character, whom I named after Maeve.
...
...
...
LOL.
21-35 points: Borderline-Sue. Your character is cutting it close, and you may want to work on the details a bit, but you're well on your way to having a lovely original character. Good work.

These questions weren't extensive enough. They didn't get into personalities as they should've.
But just for fun, right?


It's all fun to you and me, but sadly, many out there in fandoms (fanfiction) swear a blood oath by it and judge OC's by that standard.

Like it was made by the President of the High Council of Original Characters or something...

10
Author Craft / Re: Is your character a Mary Sue?
« on: February 25, 2007, 04:41:53 PM »
I hate those test with a passion. Not to offend you, since I know you were just posting in fun...but those things are rigged and slanted toward certain questions and attributes--not taking into consideration of skill level. If the skill level of an author is very good, he/she can write the typical MS and make her/him completely real.

Sorry, just had bad issues with that test...though, I think Laurell K. Hamilton's Anita should take it. I have a feeling Anita would fail...badly. I think one more book and she'll transcend into Demi-goddom. 

11
Author Craft / Re: Fanfiction - Good or Evil?
« on: February 25, 2007, 04:37:34 PM »
The only thing I will say...is I like slash, but only when done well, and IC. Which brings me to non-con, and basically darker stories. I'm not apologizing for liking slash or fanfiction, and I'm getting a slight vibe that I should be doing so...but I'm won't.

To each their own. While I'm using it as a stepping stone, getting my mistakes and style ironed out, others may say I should do it with orignial works. Well, I guess we'll agree to disagree, and leave it at that. 

12
Author Craft / Re: Wordcount!
« on: February 25, 2007, 04:33:14 PM »
Hmmm longest was over 100,000 words, and my current is 88,900. I could use some trimming in the 88 one, but not until it's finished. 

13
Author Craft / Re: rewrites
« on: February 25, 2007, 04:31:17 PM »
I'm currently revising in the middle of a story...and simply because my skill has improved drastically than when I first began it. When you have that problem (and yes, it is a problem...trust me), I think there is no right or wrong way to complete the task. While realistically I should wait until I'm all finished, I simply cannot reread my first few chapters without cringing.

So, if it's that bad...I say Revise At Will. 

14
Author Craft / Re: Would you stop?
« on: February 20, 2007, 03:22:01 AM »
Well, since the online market is fair game...I've seen some pretty horrible stories and authors published --so you would have to be really really really bad I think for your writing to never see the light of day. There is always fanfic, and original story sites that cater to well, original stories. Most Fanfiction sites have a original section--so chances are, someone would read your work. I'm speaking in general of course, not to the original poster.

Me personally...not sure if I have what it takes. Hmm, I've been told I can be published, but I lack the confidence in my work to pursue it. I've also been told I have 'raw' talent. Hence, the safe route of fanfic. I'm a big fish in a little pond where that is concerned, and fear it would be the opposite in the 'published ocean.' I did give up my writing for a while, but now have rediscovered the passion for it once more. Granted, I have my artwork to fall back on and my super duper swell retail jobs if something happens and I give up...again.

Though, sometimes I do wonder if I'm wasting my time--but whenever I feel like that, I always find a published story that I can write rings around...and think I might have a chance...


But no, if I was told I was horrible, I wouldn't give up writing...I may not publish it online and feel like major crap for a while, but I would still dabble with prose for myself.

15
Author Craft / Re: New Writer's Group from this Board
« on: February 20, 2007, 03:08:42 AM »
Yes we are.  Feel free to send a PM to either Mickey or myself and we'll get you set up with an account the first chance we get.   ;D

I sent a PM to Mickey...thanks for letting me know!

Pages: [1] 2