1
Author Craft / Re: The Illusion of Danger
« on: July 27, 2006, 10:55:39 PM »
I completely agree.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
In my personal experience, I've found that most novels that lack that special something to grab your attention at the start tend to be lacking in other areas as well. It might be the writing, the characterization, the plot, all of the above, etc. Good writers, however, tend to know that the beginning is important to a story, and thus start a novel off right, simply because they are good writers. The beginning doesn't have to be bombs-exploding, ninjas-dueling epic or anything, but it needs to capture your imagination. That's what I mean when I say a book needs to "start off with a bang": it doesn't necessarily have to be an action-packed start; it just needs to have a hook of one kind or another--it has to be interesting.QuoteThe book sits on my nightstand, innocent in its trappings: a simple diary, encased in a simple cloth, the muted floral print stained and dirty. The small brass lock is jammed in the open position. The whole ensemble gives the impression of a child's diary, lost in the sandbox in school.
It scares the hell out of me.
The mist comes and we dare not separate. That was how we lost Charles.
It's not a fight to the death or "a flash and a bang" kind of start, but this opening grabs your attention and makes you want to read more to find out what's going on. That's what I meant by an interesting opening. An opening can be both artful and still hook you like a fish.
Jim certainly gives good advice, and I agree...his bit on LJ about character development was a huge help to me. In my reading and library work, I've run across some memorable characters: Harry Dresden, obviously; of course Bob is as well, because now everyone wants a talking skull...Other characters like Douglas Preston and Lincoln Child's Special Agent Aloysius Pendergast, Kim Harrison's Rachel Morgan, Janet Evanovich's Stephanie Plum, and Jeffrey Deaver's Lincoln Rhyme are all very memorable characters in modern fiction.
They're all memorable for different reasons. Harry is sarcastic and has a great sense of humor, but what makes him stick out, for me, is his heart. Yes, he may sling spells and have more than a few questionable allies in his line of work, but he is a guy who will do whatever it takes to protect the ones he cares about. What also strikes me with Harry is that his character has evolved, but not disappeared. There are other writers, whom I won't mention, whose characters have lost their touch, their uniqueness.
The other characters I mentioned have very unique attributes to them as well. Special Agent Pendergast is a New Orleans native, old money, whose complexion is white as a sheet, and he wears only black, tailored suits. He's a brilliant mind who has old-world tastes and a general...oddness about him. Of course, having a psychotic younger brother out to kill you (Diogenes Pendergast) also helps.Rachel Morgan's got her own array of spells and magic, along with a pixie sidekick, Stephanie Plum's a klutzy bounty hunter, and Lincoln Rhyme is a crippled, but brilliant, criminal analyst.
It's just like Jim said on his LJ (as I loop back around to the starting point of this reply)...you've got to make them memorable, because otherwise, they're as flat as the page they've been printed on.
That's why I love Jim's writing so; he never has any flat characters.
Preston and Child really struck gold with him and his series! I'm just so thrilled to see a Southern character who' s really smart and stylish, and who isn't portrayed as being a stupid, inbred hick! Because, despite what people may think, there aren't very many people from the South who are that way, thankyouverymuch.
Good post, pinkdoom!
Heh, while I'm all for the "Star Trek" style "let people write whatever they want but don't make it all canon" thing... I submit the following as an example of how horribly, horribly wrong that can go.
Star Trek meets X-Men
The very concept makes me shudder. Granted I haven't read it, but just ick... And do we really want "Harry and Harry: Dresden teaches at Hogwarts" or "The Wizard at the End of the Universe: Harry Dresden meets Marvin the Paranoid Android"... scary ideas.
For the same reason, my favourite Japanese word is 'tokidoki'. ('sometimes') Too bad I can't say it out loud without sounding about five years old.
In English, my favourites are probably 'countenance' and 'appropriate' - the verbs in both cases. Why steal something when you can appropriate it?
('Course, I'm not saying he can't die; he's immortal, not invulnerable.
)
However, if you send it to a big publishing house, and you throw copyright info on there, it's a tad insulting to their ethics, suggesting that they might steal your manuscript.
From what I understand, the "mail it to yourself and don't open it" thing won't stand up in court. If you're really that concerned with someone walking off with your stuff, register it.

I'd be a bit nervous about posting that there. Not cause of Baen stealing it (want a quick way to insult an editor? Include a copyright notice in the submission), but of others walking off with ideas.
