I'm not done all the books yet, so I've been real leery about getting too deep into Our World.  Blaze Away definitely covers my idea, although I like your upgraded Empty Mag Empty Room.

Here's two modified Spin Doctor stunts:
Spin Doctor: You may take 1 additional mild social consequence
OR
Spin Doctor: You may take 2 additional mild social consequences in situations like public debates, political campaigns, or the like

My rationale behind using Stealth for attack in my above ideas is honestly the "stealth kill" scene from any number of movies and video games.  The focus isn't on the actual kill so much as it is about Stealth making the kill easy, regardless of what weapon or training the attacker has. 

Had some more ideas!

Survival:
They're In the Trees: Roll Survival instead of Stealth for setting ambushes and traps outdoors
Without A Trace: Use Survival instead of Stealth when Hiding in the wilderness
(maybe these could be combined into one)

Resources:
Money Talks: Use Resources instead of Contacts for Gathering Information

Rapport:
Everybody's Buddy: Use Rapport instead of Contacts for the Knowing People or Gather Information trappings
Poker Face: When Closing Down, your intentions aren't obvious until your opponent beats your Rapport

Presence:
Spin Doctor: You may take 2 additional mild social consequences

I don't have a list like Sanctaphrax, but I've got an idea here and there, starting with Guns:

Empty Mag Empty Room: Your speed and marksmanship are so great that you can make Spray attacks with semiautomatic weapons.  Just as if you were using an automatic weapon, you must split your attacks into minimum shifts of +1 or better.  Using Empty Mag Empty Room will empty your weapon's magazine, and you must have at least one round per target affected for this stunt to have any rational chance of happening.

This is for the Martin Riggs and John McLanes and Chow Yun-Fats out there, the guys who can get the same wall of lead with a little Beretta that it'd take a normal guy with an MP-5.

Hi all,

I apologize if this has been answered before but I didn't see anything in the rules that specifically address this, or I didn't know where to look.  When an character's Aspect is compelled as a means to complicate their action, does it impose a -2 penalty (opposite from an invocation) or simply causes the stated action to fail?  I'm especially confused when it comes to players compelling Aspects placed or discovered on opponents.  Here's an example of what I mean:

Dean's PC, Sam, has just slammed a fire axe into an evil-but-fuzzy Friendigo and inflicted a consequence, "Barely Holding Its Guts In".  When the Friendigo counterattacks, Dean says the Friendigo's vicious swings are poorly aimed due to its injuries, taking the free tag on its consequence and getting a +2 to Sam's Athletics roll to dodge.  I get that, that's all well and good.  Now, what if on the next exchange, the Friendigo tries to attack Sam's friend Bobby, who's in a wheelchair and can't really dodge?  Dean throws down a FATE point and.... what?

1.  Compels the Friendigo's injury, saying it can't make it to Bobby and kill him because it's too busy holding its guts in?  Does the Friendigo just fail, accept the FATE point, and we move on?

2.  Or does the Friendigo accept the FATE point and suffer a -2 to its attack on Bobby - but still gets to attack despite the penalty?