ParanetOnline

The Dresden Files => DF Spoilers => Topic started by: JamieLO on November 10, 2021, 09:08:33 PM

Title: Is Murphy truly dead
Post by: JamieLO on November 10, 2021, 09:08:33 PM
I’ve been out of the country and only recently finished Peace Talks and Battle Ground. I was fortunate to be able to treat them as one book as Jim Butcher originally intended. Jim was quite excellent at setting up the possibility that Murphy didn’t actually die when he showed Harry being “killed” by Ebenezer at the beach. Maybe Molly fund a way to use her talent for veils and constructs. There is a lot we didn’t “see” from the time Molly leaves, Murphy “stays at Mac’s”, and when Harry and Murphy reunite with the motorcycle. Whose to say that a Einherjar wasn’t transported in the guise of Murphy. While Murphy herself is under the protection of Molly in the Never Never? Jim has done the death fake out before with at least a couple of the women in Harry’s life. What I’m saying is, it wouldn’t be the first time in the history of the series. It’s just a thought of possibility to be able to “bring Murphy back”.
Title: Re: Is Murphy truly dead
Post by: Conspiracy Theorist on November 10, 2021, 11:13:50 PM
Yes and no, she was taken to be an Einenjahren due to her prowess as a giant slayer by Odin.

A WOJ indicates that the Einenjhar are brought back to life because Odin has access to Soul Fire, essential in properly bringing someone back from the dead as other than something like a Black Court Vampire.

Soul Fire is the gift of the White God not an inherent power of Odin and of course Harry has it as well. Odin is effectively recruiting on behalf of the White God it would seem taking his use of Soul Power and the Kringle Mantle (Kringle can bypass thresholds, undoubtedly a protection put in place by the White God which Kringle is an exception to in agreement with Uriel).

This would make Murphy’s faith wholly consistent with the end of her life and her after-life, she had a good death but her service to the White God is not yet done. She was a former Knight of the Cross after all as well as being a Jotun Slayer.

The Einenjhar in mythology are linked to Odin, he dies they die. They also cannot return until living memory has forgotten them ie within the lifespan of mortal man.

In the BAT Murphy might return, but if this is Ragnarok then Odin will die, so it may well be Harry uses his Soul Fire to replace Odin in that connection, meaning that Murphy would then live as long as Harry. Or may not.

Meanwhile Murphy is in Valhalla surrounded by large hairy men feasting on boar and mead and wondering where she can get a chicken salad and mineral water.
Title: Re: Is Murphy truly dead
Post by: Arjan on November 11, 2021, 02:26:16 PM
Yes and no, she was taken to be an Einenjahren due to her prowess as a giant slayer by Odin.

A WOJ indicates that the Einenjhar are brought back to life because Odin has access to Soul Fire, essential in properly bringing someone back from the dead as other than something like a Black Court Vampire.

Soul Fire is the gift of the White God not an inherent power of Odin
How do you know? The white god is just another name for Ymir. Uriel and Odin did cut him up together to create the world and after that their careers diverged somewhat but that is why you never hear that much about the white god.
Quote
and of course Harry has it as well. Odin is effectively recruiting on behalf of the White God it would seem taking his use of Soul Power and the Kringle Mantle (Kringle can bypass thresholds, undoubtedly a protection put in place by the White God which Kringle is an exception to in agreement with Uriel).
Kringle can bypass thresholds because he is a fairy and comes as a guest with good intentions.
Quote
This would make Murphy’s faith wholly consistent with the end of her life and her after-life, she had a good death but her service to the White God is not yet done. She was a former Knight of the Cross after all as well as being a Jotun Slayer.

The Einenjhar in mythology are linked to Odin, he dies they die. They also cannot return until living memory has forgotten them ie within the lifespan of mortal man.

In the BAT Murphy might return, but if this is Ragnarok then Odin will die, so it may well be Harry uses his Soul Fire to replace Odin in that connection, meaning that Murphy would then live as long as Harry. Or may not.

Meanwhile Murphy is in Valhalla surrounded by large hairy men feasting on boar and mead and wondering where she can get a chicken salad and mineral water.
Gard said she would be taken care of. They will serve whatever she wants.
Title: Re: Is Murphy truly dead
Post by: Conspiracy Theorist on November 11, 2021, 05:14:13 PM
We have been given no data on Ymir, in the Dresdenverse we have on the White God, Odin hasn’t been forthcoming on his family, what we really need is a Larry Fowler Special dishing the dirt on the entire clan.

Kringle isn’t a Faerie he has a Faerie Mantle like Molly (cultural appropriation at its worst). A guest has to be invited in and whilst a goodly number of children invite Kringle in, I doubt unless an adult resident does so it sticks, a minor lacks the capacity to enter into a contract. The Fae are big on that.

Have you ever tried to get an institution to change ? I doubt they even have a proper ladies toilet. However I do not doubt Murphy is raising hell in Valhalla forcing change, through a kick to the groin a cogent well structured argument.

Gard may say that she is fine, but her and her sisters don’t stay there. As it stands Nathan is also probably making it known that he unhappy about the lack of a university level research library, as most of his new compatriots relied upon the oral tradition of the Edda’s rather than learn to read, let alone indulge in a doctoral level of academic debate.
Title: Re: Is Murphy truly dead
Post by: Mira on November 11, 2021, 05:18:31 PM


Gard also said that there are rules that even Odin can violate.  Don't you think if Gard
could get around the rules to see Hendrix again, she would? 
Title: Re: Is Murphy truly dead
Post by: Conspiracy Theorist on November 11, 2021, 05:31:31 PM
Which suggests on this he answers to the White God through his local agent Uriel.
Title: Re: Is Murphy truly dead
Post by: Arjan on November 11, 2021, 06:20:27 PM
We have been given no data on Ymir, in the Dresdenverse we have on the White God,

That is because we have a story told by an American named Harry living in Chicago. We know that the story would have been completely different if it was told by a Tamil from India. The local myth influences the tale.
Quote

We do not have details about him. Only what people said and that is not reliable, they will tell the myth of the white god.

Odin hasn’t been forthcoming on his family, what we really need is a Larry Fowler Special dishing the dirt on the entire clan.

Kringle isn’t a Faerie he has a Faerie Mantle like Molly (cultural appropriation at its worst). A guest has to be invited in and whilst a goodly number of children invite Kringle in, I doubt unless an adult resident does so it sticks, a minor lacks the capacity to enter into a contract. The Fae are big on that.
It is described in the books when Cat Sith entered Thomas’ apartment. Mab entered Michaels house without invitation. They do not need an invitation if they behave like guests.
Quote
Have you ever tried to get an institution to change ? I doubt they even have a proper ladies toilet. However I do not doubt Murphy is raising hell in Valhalla forcing change, through a kick to the groin a cogent well structured argument.
She is used to male environments and she trained with the einherjar in the past. She knows them.
Quote
Gard may say that she is fine, but her and her sisters don’t stay there.
We don’t know that. We only meet the einherjar and the valkyries when they are on a mission.

Vadderung is a collector. He probably has a complete library with military books :)
Quote
As it stands Nathan is also probably making it known that he unhappy about the lack of a university level research library, as most of his new compatriots relied upon the oral tradition of the Edda’s rather than learn to read, let alone indulge in a doctoral level of academic debate.
On average ancient people are more intelligent than modern people because they don’t have stupid factory jobs where you only have to turn one screw at every car or something like that. They can compose long poems without paper and sing them. Maybe Nathan did study Icelandic sagas.

Besides they adapt. They can use firearms now. Maybe Vadderung sends them to West Point or something like that.
Title: Re: Is Murphy truly dead
Post by: groinkick on November 11, 2021, 07:49:28 PM
She will absolutely be back.  She won't be an injured, aged, vanilla mortal though.
Title: Re: Is Murphy truly dead
Post by: Conspiracy Theorist on November 11, 2021, 08:20:27 PM
Gosh, are you saying the Multiverse doesn’t revolve around Harry? I’m shocked, shocked I say!

And Murphy will return? There is nothing to indicate that at all except the fact that her body mysteriously disappeared and a known Chooser of the Slain said she had been taken by Odin, leaving behind a mystic symbol indicating she had been chosen. Nothing at all.

Jim really likes to have things both ways sometimes, leaving us with Schroedingers Murphy.
Title: Re: Is Murphy truly dead
Post by: Mira on November 11, 2021, 09:22:25 PM
She will absolutely be back.  She won't be an injured, aged, vanilla mortal though.

Naw, she will have a hairy chest..
Title: Re: Is Murphy truly dead
Post by: Arjan on November 11, 2021, 09:37:52 PM
Naw, she will have a hairy chest..
But now she gets a new superpower. She can eat and drink as much as she wants and she will be still fit and healthy the next morning!
Title: Re: Is Murphy truly dead
Post by: The_Sibelis on November 12, 2021, 03:28:14 AM
Feel like Odin really took her to hold on to her most vital aspect for revival. But someone else with soul fire we know of is going to do the actual deed, someone who isn't limited by mortal memory.
Title: Re: Is Murphy truly dead
Post by: Mira on November 12, 2021, 05:35:00 AM
But now she gets a new superpower. She can eat and drink as much as she wants and she will be still fit and healthy the next morning!

Yeah, and among other things if she is farmed out to fight and is killed again, she wakes up to do it all over again...
Title: Re: Is Murphy truly dead
Post by: Arjan on November 12, 2021, 07:01:10 AM
Yeah, and among other things if she is farmed out to fight and is killed again, she wakes up to do it all over again...
The dream of every martial arts fanatic!
Title: Re: Is Murphy truly dead
Post by: Mira on November 12, 2021, 11:52:11 AM
The dream of every martial arts fanatic!

But it does get old after a while...  Also what does that do to her faith and the promise of Heaven? 
Title: Re: Is Murphy truly dead
Post by: Arjan on November 12, 2021, 03:03:42 PM
But it does get old after a while...  Also what does that do to her faith and the promise of Heaven?
That is the problem with most descriptions of the afterlife. People get endless creative describing the tortures of hell but their descriptions of heaven get boring rather fast. You sit on a cloud playing harp singing hallelujah. Wow.

This is what Murphy wanted. She wanted to be part of it and now she gets a role in the next apocalypse and she can act. I believe Gard when she tells Harry that Vadderung will treat her well.

Title: Re: Is Murphy truly dead
Post by: Conspiracy Theorist on November 12, 2021, 04:00:05 PM
That is the problem with most descriptions of the afterlife. People get endless creative describing the tortures of hell but their descriptions of heaven get boring rather fast. You sit on a cloud playing harp singing hallelujah. Wow.

This is what Murphy wanted. She wanted to be part of it and now she gets a role in the next apocalypse and she can act. I believe Gard when she tells Harry that Vadderung will treat her well.

I hope she holds out for a winged Shetland pony. With wing mounted GE mini guns.
Title: Re: Is Murphy truly dead
Post by: morriswalters on November 12, 2021, 04:17:53 PM
That is the problem with most descriptions of the afterlife. People get endless creative describing the tortures of hell but their descriptions of heaven get boring rather fast. You sit on a cloud playing harp singing hallelujah. Wow.

This is what Murphy wanted. She wanted to be part of it and now she gets a role in the next apocalypse and she can act. I believe Gard when she tells Harry that Vadderung will treat her well.
As part of the story I suppose it's okay, but as a reality, if I were Murphy, I would just as soon skip it. Life as a eternal mercenary would fit as my version of what hell might be, assuming there was life after death. Dying and fighting and suffering for eternity.
Title: Re: Is Murphy truly dead
Post by: Mira on November 12, 2021, 06:35:24 PM
As part of the story I suppose it's okay, but as a reality, if I were Murphy, I would just as soon skip it. Life as a eternal mercenary would fit as my version of what hell might be, assuming there was life after death. Dying and fighting and suffering for eternity.

I totally agree with you and doesn't fit with the Murphy we've gotten to know over the years.  Yeah she got on well with the einherjar, but that doesn't mean she'd like to be one if she had a choice.  I think if she couldn't go straight to Heaven she'd prefer hanging out with her father working for Uriel.
Title: Re: Is Murphy truly dead
Post by: Arjan on November 12, 2021, 07:55:45 PM
As part of the story I suppose it's okay, but as a reality, if I were Murphy, I would just as soon skip it. Life as a eternal mercenary would fit as my version of what hell might be, assuming there was life after death. Dying and fighting and suffering for eternity.
Or she will fit in perfectly, she is not you or me. I do not think Vadderung would have taken her if it did not fit her. She would get bored quickly sitting on a cloud playing harp.



Title: Re: Is Murphy truly dead
Post by: Conspiracy Theorist on November 12, 2021, 10:34:03 PM
I think Murphy has more use than as a common grunt to Odin. I think she will be used initially as a consultant using her knowledge of policing and detective work, principally every law enforcement organisation will be breaking down the door to Monoc Security after Chicago and Murphy is the ideal person for that job. Field work may be a bit of a problem, though, unless there is some work around “not in mortal memory”.
Title: Re: Is Murphy truly dead
Post by: morriswalters on November 13, 2021, 01:33:07 AM
Her boss sells his service to a crime lord who murders, sells drugs and carries a Denarian Coin.  Consider that.  But I wasn't commenting on the story, I was commenting on the idea, for me personally.  It sounds sexy when it's written but imagine going to war over and over again. And doing nothing else. I'd as soon have a harp.

Title: Re: Is Murphy truly dead
Post by: Conspiracy Theorist on November 13, 2021, 02:47:01 AM
Odin sells his services to a lot of people, Marcone but a single customer. Lara Raith is also a customer of Monoc. That’s at least two Aacords Members, governments of the supernatural world. Off course governments of the mortal world are going to use Monoc.
Title: Re: Is Murphy truly dead
Post by: Arjan on November 13, 2021, 05:02:30 AM
Her boss sells his service to a crime lord who murders, sells drugs and carries a Denarian Coin.  Consider that.  But I wasn't commenting on the story, I was commenting on the idea, for me personally.  It sounds sexy when it's written but imagine going to war over and over again. And doing nothing else. I'd as soon have a harp.
We are too far from the world where these stories originated and after the First World War most people got a better understanding about what war really is. But for the einherjar war’s terrible aspects are mostly removed. They won’t die or get crippled for life and it is not about getting wet cold and ill in some far away trench. For them it is more like extreme martial arts followed by partying every day. It is a simple and boring concept of heaven but I have never read a description of heaven that was good enough for me to spend eternity there without the treat of hell as the alternative.

But she gets to see how everything ends in the next apocalypse and she can even play her part in it. That will be soon and that is what she always wanted. She made the wrong choices for playing harp.


Title: Re: Is Murphy truly dead
Post by: morriswalters on November 13, 2021, 06:30:04 AM
Odin sells his services to a lot of people, Marcone but a single customer. Lara Raith is also a customer of Monoc. That’s at least two Aacords Members, governments of the supernatural world. Off course governments of the mortal world are going to use Monoc.
Reconcile Murphy as a police officer and then as a bodyguard to someone like Marcone.  How does that work as part of the her story? I'm sure that moral dilemma will never make it into the books, if we see her again at all. But it's implicit in the idea. You look at this in a way that is different then the way I do.  For me sending her to wherever stole the emotional kick from her death. She didn't die in any true sense.  All Jim did was take Harry's bone away and threw it into the yard next store. A plain headstone next to Harry's grave would have had more of an emotional punch for me. But Jim is the author so I bow to his sense of his story.
Title: Re: Is Murphy truly dead
Post by: Mira on November 13, 2021, 11:48:46 AM
Reconcile Murphy as a police officer and then as a bodyguard to someone like Marcone.  How does that work as part of the her story? I'm sure that moral dilemma will never make it into the books, if we see her again at all. But it's implicit in the idea. You look at this in a way that is different then the way I do.  For me sending her to wherever stole the emotional kick from her death. She didn't die in any true sense.  All Jim did was take Harry's bone away and threw it into the yard next store. A plain headstone next to Harry's grave would have had more of an emotional punch for me. But Jim is the author so I bow to his sense of his story.
Bringing Murphy back, but changing her into some kind of mercenary police officer, wouldn't be the Murphy we know.  Perhaps that is what is meant by no return until all mortal memory of her is lost or gone.
Quote
We are too far from the world where these stories originated and after the First World War most people got a better understanding about what war really is. But for the einherjar war’s terrible aspects are mostly removed. They won’t die or get crippled for life and it is not about getting wet cold and ill in some far away trench. For them it is more like extreme martial arts followed by partying every day. It is a simple and boring concept of heaven but I have never read a description of heaven that was good enough for me to spend eternity there without the treat of hell as the alternative.
Really? War sanitized, who could ask for anything more?  The einherjar around Marcone weren't suffering, but they didn't seem overly happy either.  Hey it that was such a great thing, Gard wouldn't be mourning like she is, in theory, you'd think she'd be able to visit Hendrix any time she wanted and have a good old time.  He's in Valhalla, she goes to those parties, but the catch is he is no longer the Hendrix she knew and loved.
Title: Re: Is Murphy truly dead
Post by: Conspiracy Theorist on November 13, 2021, 12:04:32 PM
Why as a mercenary police officer? She is better suited than anyone to train other police officers in dealing with supernatural threats. All that needs to occur is that trainees from various forces aretaken to a “secure facility” i.e Valhalla where they undergo a couple of weeks residential training run by Murphy.

Of course she would be introduced as a “former” police officer. It might dishearten those looking forward to retirement that even death is not a bar to service, if they are told her full backstory.

As set out above her service to Odin is still service to the White God, and at their she is the policeman’s policewoman.
Title: Re: Is Murphy truly dead
Post by: Arjan on November 13, 2021, 12:32:29 PM
Bringing Murphy back, but changing her into some kind of mercenary police officer, wouldn't be the Murphy we know.  Perhaps that is what is meant by no return until all mortal memory of her is lost or gone.Really? War sanitized, who could ask for anything more? 
A lot more but that is me, the people who made up that story thought it was pretty cool. They liked hitting people apparently but saw some problems with it so their heaven had free hitting people for a good cause without repercussions.

Jim uses old stories that when you really look critically at them have loads of problems attached but I think that if you let people choose between an eternity of booze and fighting versus clouds and making music the first option will still get enough volunteers. Just not me. Though I might ask for a violin and spend a century or so learning to play it properly.
Quote
The einherjar around Marcone weren't suffering, but they didn't seem overly happy either. 
They were ecstatic when they fought the jotun in battle ground.
Quote
Hey it that was such a great thing, Gard wouldn't be mourning like she is, in theory, you'd think she'd be able to visit Hendrix any time she wanted and have a good old time. 
Probably not. Jim somewhere described Valkyries as mortals with benefits.
Quote
He's in Valhalla, she goes to those parties, but the catch is he is no longer the Hendrix she knew and loved.
As long as it is his soul it is basically him.
Title: Re: Is Murphy truly dead
Post by: Mira on November 13, 2021, 03:53:38 PM
Quote
Why as a mercenary police officer? She is better suited than anyone to train other police officers in dealing with supernatural threats. All that needs to occur is that trainees from various forces aretaken to a “secure facility” i.e Valhalla where they undergo a couple of weeks residential training run by Murphy.

She will be farmed out, and do you think she will be allowed her own beliefs in these matters?  I doubt it.
Quote
A lot more but that is me, the people who made up that story thought it was pretty cool. They liked hitting people apparently but saw some problems with it so their heaven had free hitting people for a good cause without repercussions.
Yeah, well, you have to believe that the einherjar who worked for Marcone, worked for a good cause.  At the end of the day, Marcone is still a murderous gangster, and the einherjar are part of that.
Quote
They were ecstatic when they fought the jotun in battle ground.

Happy or hyped up with berserker type emotion?  Yeah, that is a lovely picture for Murphy.
Quote
Probably not. Jim somewhere described Valkyries as mortals with benefits.
I don't think Gard is a mortal.
Quote
As long as it is his soul it is basically him.
Is it? 
Title: Re: Is Murphy truly dead
Post by: Arjan on November 13, 2021, 04:27:47 PM
She will be farmed out, and do you think she will be allowed her own beliefs in these matters?  I doubt it. Yeah, well, you have to believe that the einherjar who worked for Marcone, worked for a good cause. 
[/spoiler]
Just as when she worked with Marcone in the past. The good cause is stopping the outsiders and that will be the focus of the last books.

She wanted to be involved with that.
(click to show/hide)
They are children of their time but in all their interactions they come across as human enough. Besides they were eager, not rabid. No biting in their shields and foam on their mouths. They just had fun.
Quote
Yeah, that is a lovely picture for Murphy.I don't think Gard is a mortal.Is it?
It was explicitly stated in woj, mortal with benefits. The line between mortal and immortal is blurry though. I do not think these two get to see each other.

Soul is the essence of who someone is. As long as you have your soul you are yourself. Walhalla is a genuine afterlife so the people in there are the same people. Makes no sense otherwise, it would not be an afterlife.

And souls would have no use.
Title: Re: Is Murphy truly dead
Post by: Conspiracy Theorist on November 13, 2021, 05:13:06 PM
Gard acted as if she were bereaved, and she would know. For all we know she might have been contemplating a future, a family with Hendricks, and that is now gone.
Title: Re: Is Murphy truly dead
Post by: TrueMonk on November 13, 2021, 06:07:52 PM
To be fair we do not know what the contract with Marcone says. It could be anything between they will do whatever you want and monster killing only. I do not think the latter is all that unlikely.

One statement that could be relevant to the discussion is that Gard (or the other Valkyrie?) At one point stated that Einherjaren so not make good lovers. I wonder why that is?
Title: Re: Is Murphy truly dead
Post by: Arjan on November 13, 2021, 07:46:48 PM
To be fair we do not know what the contract with Marcone says. It could be anything between they will do whatever you want and monster killing only. I do not think the latter is all that unlikely.

One statement that could be relevant to the discussion is that Gard (or the other Valkyrie?) At one point stated that Einherjaren so not make good lovers. I wonder why that is?
Prejudice  :) modern men are so much better.

But apparently everything still functions which tells you Odin did a good job.
Title: Re: Is Murphy truly dead
Post by: Conspiracy Theorist on November 13, 2021, 08:40:35 PM
And yet Gard was deeply in love with Hendricks who conformed to the physical stereotype of Einenjhar to a tee. He had even grown a beard in PT/BG.

This would suggest it is something about Hendrick’s character which differentiated him from the Einenjhar, in an anti-theistic all manner. It wasn’t his attitude to battle, Hendricks was an enthusiastic and accomplished warrior. This leaves his attitude to the fairer sex as the likely point of divergence, and attraction to Gard. From this I believe we can deduce Nathan Hendricks was a feminist.

He was known to admonish with reproving looks Marcone, and this must have been occasions when Marcone referred or treated women in the outfit in a poor or discriminatory fashion compared to their Male co-workers.

Now we know what his thesis probably was. “Feminism and It’s Role in Organised Criminal Undertakings In the United States Of America in the 21st Century”. Ms Demeter was likely his prime case study. Gard may have been another. Lara would have been a third. You can therefore see the attraction for Hendricks with Gard, a strong, supremely competent woman, his physical and intellectual equal and someone with whom he was not afraid to share his emotional life with. Gard knew Hendricks hated the name Nathan but kept it for his mothers sake.

Valhalla therefore doesn’t have one but two feminists amongst its denizens.
Title: Re: Is Murphy truly dead
Post by: morriswalters on November 14, 2021, 03:29:54 AM
Soul is the essence of who someone is. As long as you have your soul you are yourself. Walhalla is a genuine afterlife so the people in there are the same people. Makes no sense otherwise, it would not be an afterlife.

And souls would have no use.
You are you only so long as you have the people who are part of you in your life.  When you're 100 and everybody you know is dead who are you then?  It's a morbid thought but it is what it is. Remember those Ghosts in Ghost Story that couldn't remember who and what they were. They may not have been souls but they are much what I imagine souls could become watching everyone they ever knew die.

In terms of the story it allows Jim to cheat.  That's now three people Jim has stashed against some story idea that might need them.  So Murphy will remain dead only so long as the story doesn't demand her.



Title: Re: Is Murphy truly dead
Post by: Arjan on November 14, 2021, 03:47:43 AM
You are you only so long as you have the people who are part of you in your life.  When you're 100 and everybody you know is dead who are you then?  It's a morbid thought but it is what it is. Remember those Ghosts in Ghost Story that couldn't remember who and what they were. They may not have been souls but they are much what I imagine souls could become watching everyone they ever knew die.

In terms of the story it allows Jim to cheat.  That's now three people Jim has stashed against some story idea that might need them.  So Murphy will remain dead only so long as the story doesn't demand her.
Everybody she knew. She knew quite a few of them already.

Question for Jim. Are you going to write a short story about Murphy in Walhalla?
Title: Re: Is Murphy truly dead
Post by: Arjan on November 14, 2021, 09:43:23 AM
Also Jim is very busy sanitizing Norse mythology. The entrance criteria to walhalla in Gard’s speech at the end of Battle Ground are from what you will find in old sources and where is vadderungs thirst for human sacrifices?

One explanation is that when human stories change they change. The other one is that Jim does not want to deal too much with the differences in morality between the the original stories and current readers.

Murphy will be fine. Jim just changes the story enough to make that happen.
Title: Re: Is Murphy truly dead
Post by: Conspiracy Theorist on November 14, 2021, 10:14:07 AM
Indeed look, at how the story of Kringle has evolved, Odin was part of it in mythology with Christianity absorbing the ‘pagan’ Norse religion, but I bet Vadderung has in recent decades started to get a wicked thirst for Coca Cola, neat.

Harry has never done a summoning for Kringle it would be very interesting to see him do one, and what he would use given the evolution of his personal mythos.

The same should apply with the Odin aspect, the MCU will have been pulling that in a radically different direction in the last decade and a bit in particular, but sounding like Sir Anthony is better than an unquenchable thirst for the real thing.

I do wonder if the creation of the Vadderung persona was to counteract these different pulls? No real public aspect unlike Kringle or Odin to be manipulated. As Vadderung Odin/Kringle can be more himself. We know how Mab feels about Disney, how much of a pull is that on her? Does the freedom Molly has in the Good People reflect the effect of Frozen, allowing her to stay attached to her family? To do ‘good’?

The MCU/Marvel Comics doesn’t really include the Einenjhar (unless those were Hel’s Soldiers) but does include Valkyries. Is this reshaping Valhalla?
Title: Re: Is Murphy truly dead
Post by: The_Sibelis on November 14, 2021, 10:17:06 PM
Or ya know, they come back lacking something vital in the passion department? Like, Lucio said it was good for the soul, but if they're running on a false soul fire, they don't exactly have the same soul/passion for life. (Almost literally considering they all blew themselves up with joy to kill a giant and go back to Valhalla)
Title: Re: Is Murphy truly dead
Post by: morriswalters on November 15, 2021, 03:32:01 AM
Also Jim is very busy sanitizing Norse mythology. The entrance criteria to walhalla in Gard’s speech at the end of Battle Ground are from what you will find in old sources and where is vadderungs thirst for human sacrifices?

One explanation is that when human stories change they change. The other one is that Jim does not want to deal too much with the differences in morality between the the original stories and current readers.

Murphy will be fine. Jim just changes the story enough to make that happen.
Yeah, as I said when I added my two cents on this, it isn't about the myth.  It's how I feel about the way he handled Murphy's death in terms of how the story is written.
Title: Re: Is Murphy truly dead
Post by: Mira on November 15, 2021, 01:20:32 PM
Gard acted as if she were bereaved, and she would know. For all we know she might have been contemplating a future, a family with Hendricks, and that is now gone.

Exactly, she didn't take much comfort in the facts that Hendricks would be whooping it up in
Valhalla drinking ale, fighting where needed, possibly getting killed to be born again to do it all over again.  What she was mourning is the man she knew and loved is gone, until all memory of what she knew and loved is gone, he will return, but he won't be that man.
Title: Re: Is Murphy truly dead
Post by: vincentric on November 15, 2021, 01:57:05 PM
Nothing says they won't be themselves. The rule is that all their mortal friends, enemies, associates and loved ones will have forgotten them. They'll have to make all new connections and may change over time but anyone like say, a time travelling wizard or an immortal mantle holder, could still sit down and have a beer with them and talk about old times.
Title: Re: Is Murphy truly dead
Post by: Mira on November 15, 2021, 04:25:42 PM
Nothing says they won't be themselves. The rule is that all their mortal friends, enemies, associates and loved ones will have forgotten them. They'll have to make all new connections and may change over time but anyone like say, a time travelling wizard or an immortal mantle holder, could still sit down and have a beer with them and talk about old times.

Do you really think any of the Einenjhar that we've met at Marcone's place or elsewhere are like the mortals they used to be?  I doubt it, other than their ability as warriors, friends and family are not part of their lexicon, they are dead.  It is a kindness to those left behind I think, that they cannot return until all memory of them is lost.
Title: Re: Is Murphy truly dead
Post by: Arjan on November 15, 2021, 04:53:04 PM
Do you really think any of the Einenjhar that we've met at Marcone's place or elsewhere are like the mortals they used to be?  I doubt it, other than their ability as warriors, friends and family are not part of their lexicon, they are dead.  It is a kindness to those left behind I think, that they cannot return until all memory of them is lost.
Of course they are. Just like the souls in Hades or those in heaven. Those are afterlives otherwise they wouldn’t be. It is Murphy who went to walhalla, this is different from things like black court vampires.

Like Uriel said. You are a soul, you have a body. The soul is the defining part and where Murphy’s soul is is Murphy.
Title: Re: Is Murphy truly dead
Post by: Mira on November 15, 2021, 10:16:25 PM
Of course they are. Just like the souls in Hades or those in heaven. Those are afterlives otherwise they wouldn’t be. It is Murphy who went to walhalla, this is different from things like black court vampires.

Like Uriel said. You are a soul, you have a body. The soul is the defining part and where Murphy’s soul is is Murphy.

Maybe, maybe not... What if Odin merely has their body, but not their soul?  I don't really think being a cold blooded killer is the defining part of Murphy's soul.. 
Title: Re: Is Murphy truly dead
Post by: Conspiracy Theorist on November 15, 2021, 10:33:54 PM
I think the proscription on not going beyond the veil is that in almost every case it works out poorly trying to bring the dead back. You get it wrong and end up with Blamps, or go down the corpse taker route and seek to possess someone else with the ongoing body dysmorphia. The only route where it works out properly is uniting the correct soul with the correct body and I suspect the only way to do that is I think Soul Fire. It worked for Jesus, but I think the White God in whose sole gift Soul Fire is has laid limitations upon its use by Odin, they have to be superlative warriors and they cannot return to the mortal realm until lost from living memory.

The White God can therefore make a dispensation for Murphy when Jim he thinks it appropriate to do so.

If Odin dies the Einenjhar do as well, but Harry has Soul Fire as well and is not subject to the proscription that Odin has, and can bring back Murphy a second time, this time bound to his life, she would live as long as him,  one of her perennial worries.

Now the Soul Fire resurrection is a WOJ, Harry doesn’t know this yet.

And of course Harry gets to see Murphy die before his eyes AGAIN. Jim gets to write a second death scene for her. Irrististable.
Title: Re: Is Murphy truly dead
Post by: vincentric on November 16, 2021, 01:15:10 AM
Maybe, maybe not... What if Odin merely has their body, but not their soul?  I don't really think being a cold blooded killer is the defining part of Murphy's soul..

Do you think Gard and Freydis are just cold blooded killers? Would a cold blooded killer be getting drunk on the aftermath of the battlefield to mourn? Murphy's sparring partner in GS sure seemed to be all there. The defining part of Murphy would be a warrior that doesn't shrink from confronting evil even when outclassed and outnumbered. If you assume Odin/Vadderung is a good guy, then that's the ultimate goal of the Einerjahr. The mercenary stuff is just practice to hone their skills with modern weapons and tactics. Monoc's deal with Marcone is for magical security. We never see them doing routine criminal stuff beyond Gard being present as a bodyguard.
Title: Re: Is Murphy truly dead
Post by: Conspiracy Theorist on November 16, 2021, 01:51:43 AM
They are there for Ragnarok, the Mercenary work is to keep their hand in as warfare developes.

If Ragnarok is the BAT there isn’t time for Murphy and Hendrick’s to be lost from memory before Odin is destined to die, taking them with them. If Gard is aware of this possibility then she is truly grieving Hendick’s.
Title: Re: Is Murphy truly dead
Post by: Arjan on November 16, 2021, 02:01:24 AM
Maybe, maybe not... What if Odin merely has their body, but not their soul? 
Then it is not an afterlife. Then she did not go there. Then the whole story makes no sense at all.
Quote
I don't really think being a cold blooded killer is the defining part of Murphy's soul..
That is not how Gard formulated it.

Quote
warriors who died for family, for duty, for love

Again in everything Gard says it is about her, not her body. And it is not about what she killed, it is about what she defended.

We have to follow Jim’s story here, not what we think we know about Valhalla.
Title: Re: Is Murphy truly dead
Post by: Basil on November 16, 2021, 02:04:40 AM
Is Murphy dead?

Sort of, but she's off the board  -- considering how long many of the people that she associated with will live -- Molly, Harry, Thomas, Marconne, Maggie, Ramirez, Lara, etc. are effectively immortal, if not actually immortal.  Even if you take Thomas and Lara out of the list, chances are that one of these people is going to live for three, four maybe five centuries. 
Title: Re: Is Murphy truly dead
Post by: Mira on November 16, 2021, 05:07:06 AM
Quote
We have to follow Jim’s story here, not what we think we know about Valhalla.

True, but ever stop to think Jim is telling the readers exactly what he means?  The rule that even the All Father can't break, "she won't return until she has faded from all living memory..."  In other words, neither she nor Hendricks are physically coming back into the story, ever.  That isn't to say he might change his mind, he sort of gives himself that option.. But then again, her story ran it's natural course in many ways..
Title: Re: Is Murphy truly dead
Post by: The_Sibelis on November 16, 2021, 08:50:09 AM
I would rather it not. For one plain and specific reason. Harry's already had one "girl in the bathroom" trope done to him once, with Susan.Murphys death setting up the same sort of character growth for Dresden... Would just be overdone at this point.
Title: Re: Is Murphy truly dead
Post by: Arjan on November 16, 2021, 10:31:05 AM
I would rather it not. For one plain and specific reason. Harry's already had one "girl in the bathroom" trope done to him once, with Susan.Murphys death setting up the same sort of character growth for Dresden... Would just be overdone at this point.
Jim might do a story from her POV but for all other purposes she is dead. Unless the apocalypse changes everything to such an extend that everything is possible. Jim might go completely crazy in the last books.
Title: Re: Is Murphy truly dead
Post by: Mira on November 16, 2021, 03:27:53 PM
Quote
Then it is not an afterlife. Then she did not go there. Then the whole story makes no sense at all.

Maybe it doesn't because it doesn't follow Murphy's faith, instead she was hijacked after her death, body and all. 

Quote
That is not how Gard formulated it.

Perhaps not, but the warriors chosen were chosen because they were very good at what they did in life..

Quote
Jim might do a story from her POV but for all other purposes she is dead. Unless the apocalypse changes everything to such an extend that everything is possible. Jim might go completely crazy in the last books.

Maybe Harry finds her diary or something of that nature, going through her stuff, a chore that has to be done after one dies.
Title: Re: Is Murphy truly dead
Post by: Arjan on November 16, 2021, 03:57:19 PM
Maybe it doesn't because it doesn't follow Murphy's faith, instead she was hijacked after her death, body and all. 
Hades got Deirdre. There are exceptions.

I also remember woj about it. Sometimes you do not end up where you think you should end up and Odin can bargain for you.
Quote
Perhaps not, but the warriors chosen were chosen because they were very good at what they did in life..
That too.
Quote
Maybe Harry finds her diary or something of that nature, going through her stuff, a chore that has to be done after one dies.
Title: Re: Is Murphy truly dead
Post by: The_Sibelis on November 17, 2021, 05:36:03 AM
Jim might do a story from her POV but for all other purposes she is dead. Unless the apocalypse changes everything to such an extend that everything is possible. Jim might go completely crazy in the last books.
na, just cause the all father can't do something doesn't mean it can't be done. Death is a spectrum, and I get the feeling Odin took her just to keep her in the right range of it. Odin can revive people because he has soul fire... So exactly what would stop Harry from doing it? Except knowledge directly.
Title: Re: Is Murphy truly dead
Post by: Conspiracy Theorist on November 17, 2021, 11:09:40 AM
And Bonea would have knowledge of Soul Fire, so all Harry has to do is ask her.

Which he won’t.

Title: Re: Is Murphy truly dead
Post by: Mira on November 17, 2021, 04:12:57 PM
And Bonea would have knowledge of Soul Fire, so all Harry has to do is ask her.

Which he won’t.

Even if he did use it, since he isn't a god, wouldn't that be an abuse of his gift? 
Title: Re: Is Murphy truly dead
Post by: Conspiracy Theorist on November 17, 2021, 05:36:51 PM
It depends if he is doing so in accordance with the divine plan of the White God. Odin is, in creating the a Einenjhar, Harry cannot do so without abusing it for a personal whim, so he would need some greater purpose, otherwise Murphy dying with Odin at Ragnarok would go to her just reward for her faith and as a former Knight.

Harry would have to take on the Angel of Death, who he has already met in Ghost Story. Foreshadowing?
Title: Re: Is Murphy truly dead
Post by: Mira on November 17, 2021, 06:04:28 PM
auth,or=Conspiracy Theorist link=topic=54523.msg2351055#msg2351055 date=1637170611]
Quote
It depends if he is doing so in accordance with the divine plan of the White God. Odin is, in creating the a Chekov's gunHarry cannot do so without abusing it for a personal whim, so he would need some greater purpose, otherwise Murphy dying with Odin at Ragnarok would go to her just reward for her faith and as a former Knight.

Harry would have to take on the Angel of Death, who he has already met in Ghost Story. Foreshadowing?
The Angel of Death already did his job, Murphy is gone, whether he had anything to do with the
body pick up or not.. Murphy was cold and dead when it happened, not like Harry who wasn't all dead when he fell into the ice water and Mab's arms.  If Murphy goes to her just reward after Odin is done with her, it's Heaven, not Harry.   The whole debate is muddled, given her history as knight and her faith, I really doubt that she'd choose to go to Valhalla.. That blows out of the water the premise of her faith, as a good Christian she'd want her soul to go to Heaven, not hang out drinking ale in a warrior's paradise so she can fight and kill at a later date for a god she doesn't believe in.
Title: Re: Is Murphy truly dead
Post by: Conspiracy Theorist on November 17, 2021, 07:56:03 PM
Murphy may be a repeat customer.
Title: Re: Is Murphy truly dead
Post by: Arjan on November 17, 2021, 09:07:42 PM
It is all about free will sure but it is maybe not about the faith you confess but about the choices you make. If you look at Murphy’s choices in the past were those choices more in line with Christ or with Vadderung?

At the end she made the choice that lead to a warrior dead.
Title: Re: Is Murphy truly dead
Post by: Conspiracy Theorist on November 17, 2021, 10:28:02 PM
But all choices, the very act of Free Will is the way of the White God.
Title: Re: Is Murphy truly dead
Post by: Mira on November 17, 2021, 10:40:18 PM
It is all about free will sure but it is maybe not about the faith you confess but about the choices you make. If you look at Murphy’s choices in the past were those choices more in line with Christ or with Vadderung?

At the end she made the choice that lead to a warrior dead.

I guess you could say that, she was a bit hypercritical when she was the self appointed custodian of the Swords.
Title: Re: Is Murphy truly dead
Post by: Arjan on November 18, 2021, 02:46:16 AM
I guess you could say that, she was a bit hypercritical when she was the self appointed custodian of the Swords.
But every Valkyrie and einherjar she met liked her and had no problems with her choices. I can imagine Uriel and Vadderung having a discussion about her during lunch and they decide to look at her last choice.
Title: Re: Is Murphy truly dead
Post by: Conspiracy Theorist on November 18, 2021, 05:58:22 AM
I guess you could say that, she was a bit hypercritical when she was the self appointed custodian of the Swords.

And her choice resulted in the creation of the Faithsaber, a new Knight and the defeat by that Knight in combat of the previously undefeatable Denarian, and the White God’s relics.
Title: Re: Is Murphy truly dead
Post by: Mira on November 18, 2021, 11:46:55 AM
And her choice resulted in the creation of the Faithsaber, a new Knight and the defeat by that Knight in combat of the previously undefeatable Denarian, and the White God’s relics.

Perhaps, but that isn't why she made that choice, others had to clean up her mess.
Title: Re: Is Murphy truly dead
Post by: Arjan on November 18, 2021, 12:55:10 PM
Perhaps, but that isn't why she made that choice, others had to clean up her mess.
The point is Vadderung would have approved of that choice. If it was his sword and his opposite the story would have been different.
Title: Re: Is Murphy truly dead
Post by: Mira on November 18, 2021, 01:36:38 PM
The point is Vadderung would have approved of that choice. If it was his sword and his opposite the story would have been different.

That isn't the point though, did Murphy have a choice?  As a good Christian, she would have chosen Heaven, that basically is what the Faith is about.  Unless she feared Judgement?  I don't say that because I think she was a bad person, I don't.  However, yet another thing that Jim never explored, Murphy dealing with the aftermath of her own serious screw up with the Holy Swords and disability.  Yeah, it came out okay as everyone points out, but that doesn't excuse the mistakes she made while she had them.  Murphy knew she screwed up, and judge herself way harder perhaps than Divine Judgement would.  A short story from her point of view after Skin Game would have been great.
Title: Re: Is Murphy truly dead
Post by: Arjan on November 18, 2021, 02:18:10 PM
That isn't the point though, did Murphy have a choice?  As a good Christian, she would have chosen Heaven, that basically is what the Faith is about.  Unless she feared Judgement?  I don't say that because I think she was a bad person, I don't.  However, yet another thing that Jim never explored, Murphy dealing with the aftermath of her own serious screw up with the Holy Swords and disability.  Yeah, it came out okay as everyone points out, but that doesn't excuse the mistakes she made while she had them.  Murphy knew she screwed up, and judge herself way harder perhaps than Divine Judgement would.  A short story from her point of view after Skin Game would have been great.
But Jim’s world is not exactly the same as a Christian world. Deirdre would have ended up in hell otherwise and though her destination is not without punishment it is different.

And while your choices are important it does not mean you end up at the destination of your choice. I do not think Murphy was driven by a fear of hell into the embrace of Walhalla. She was probably a bit surprised ending up there.

What comes next is deliberately kept vague but though Murphy was born a catholic her morality was not. She always had more of a warrior mentality. I don’t think she was overly busy with eternal reward and punishment but she was trying to do what was right. That shaped her soul and attracted Vadderung’s attention.

There is a woj about it somewhere. About not getting where you think you are going to because Vadderung made some deal when both he and someone else have a claim.
Title: Re: Is Murphy truly dead
Post by: vincentric on November 18, 2021, 02:19:02 PM
Why would we need a story about Murphy dealing with her bad choices with the Swords? She had no time to feel any guilt about a bad decision.

She fights Nic and the Sword is broken. The next day Butters gets the Faithsaber and  beats Nic. By the time she wakes up from her pain meds in the hospital, Butters is there to show her it all worked out. At most, 48 hours go by and she spends most of that unconscious.

We'd already seen enough angsty Murphy with all the time she spent talking about the Nightmare and her grieving in GS. PT's Murphy is moving forward, trying to rehab and dealing with her relationship with Harry. Worrying about old coulda, woulda, shoulda problems that have been resolved in a good manner makes no sense for the practical Murphy we see beginning in SJ.
Title: Re: Is Murphy truly dead
Post by: Mira on November 18, 2021, 05:38:16 PM
Quote
She fights Nic and the Sword is broken. The next day Butters gets the Faithsaber and  beats Nic. By the time she wakes up from her pain meds in the hospital, Butters is there to show her it all worked out. At most, 48 hours go by and she spends most of that unconscious.

It's about why the Sword got broken.
Quote
We'd already seen enough angsty Murphy with all the time she spent talking about the Nightmare and her grieving in GS. PT's Murphy is moving forward, trying to rehab and dealing with her relationship with Harry. Worrying about old coulda, woulda, shoulda problems that have been resolved in a good manner makes no sense for the practical Murphy we see beginning in SJ.
.
Not the same, in Grave Peril it was about what Nightmare did to her, she was the victim.  In Skin Game she was hypocritical with what she told Harry as to why she wouldn't give him the Swords back, then she did what she said shouldn't be done in her fight with Nic.  She claimed to be the Sword's custodian, when she wasn't.  She presumed to judge Nic and attempted to execute him with the Holy Sword, that is the Almighty's job, not hers, that is why the Sword got broken.  None of that was ever dealt with in the aftermath.. No, suddenly she was cutting her cast away and while there were moments when she limped, mostly she had transformed into "Wonder Woman."

Title: Re: Is Murphy truly dead
Post by: Arjan on November 18, 2021, 06:58:28 PM
It's about why the Sword got broken.Not the same, in Grave Peril it was about what Nightmare did to her, she was the victim.  In Skin Game she was hypocritical with what she told Harry as to why she wouldn't give him the Swords back, then she did what she said shouldn't be done in her fight with Nic.  She claimed to be the Sword's custodian, when she wasn't.  She presumed to judge Nic and attempted to execute him with the Holy Sword, that is the Almighty's job, not hers, that is why the Sword got broken.  None of that was ever dealt with in the aftermath.. No, suddenly she was cutting her cast away and while there were moments when she limped, mostly she had transformed into "Wonder Woman."
She was never hypocritical. She did her best. Failing is part of that, the only sure way not to fail is to do nothing at all. She knew who she was, she came into a situation and she did her best. If she thought she was the ideal knight she would have taken the sword, Harry asked her often enough.

When she picked it up again it was because she saw no other option. That does not make her hypocritical. I think describing her as hypocritical is a complete misunderstanding of her whole being.

But what her choice made clear is that she was more suited for another mission.
Title: Re: Is Murphy truly dead
Post by: Mira on November 18, 2021, 08:02:13 PM
Quote
She was never hypocritical.

That is a matter of opinion, she tells Harry all the reasons why she won't give him back the Swords.
Then she violates one of the main rules governing them.. 
Quote
When she picked it up again it was because she saw no other option. That does not make her hypocritical. I think describing her as hypocritical is a complete misunderstanding of her whole being.

It isn't about her picking up the Sword, that doesn't make her hypocritical.. After her very long soliloquy implying if the Swords got back in Harry's hands they could be misused but if they stayed in her hands they wouldn't..  It isn't about her using the Sword, it is about how she used it. 

Here is the definition of a hypocritical action;
Quote
adjective: hypocritical

    behaving in a way that suggests one has higher standards or more noble beliefs than is the case.
    "we don't go to church and we thought it would be hypocritical to have him christened"

When Nic surrendered, gave up both noose and coin, instead of accepting it as a Holy Knight, or knowing the rules for the Swords.. Judgement wasn't up to her, yet she felt that he should die, judged him, tried to kill him and broke the Sword.. That wasn't doing what she had to do, it was doing what she knew to be wrong after berating Harry about the rules governing the Swords and why they were better off in her hands.  That my friend is hypocritical.
Quote
But what her choice made clear is that she was more suited for another mission.

That has nothing to do with it, if it made anything clear, it was she had no business keeping the Swords once Harry came back.



Title: Re: Is Murphy truly dead
Post by: Conspiracy Theorist on November 18, 2021, 08:46:24 PM
The same with Butters and Bob. Harry’s friends tried to second guess him, but those truly in the know Mab, Uriel, Odin and Hades knew Harry could be trusted with even greater things.

Murphy and Butters can’t be faulted for having imperfect vision but both of their decisions to not fully trust Harry worked out. Perhaps those who could see more clearly could see that outcome.
Title: Re: Is Murphy truly dead
Post by: morriswalters on November 18, 2021, 08:47:31 PM
When the author god is against you what choice do you have?  Jim used the character the way he always has. Murphy died when the sword broke, Jim just didn't write it out until Battle Ground. She was sacrificed for Jim's man wish to insert a goofy nerd as a knight with a light saber. Murphy's biggest sin was that she was a gurl.  And gurls don't do well in the Dresdenverse. I don't think the man knows how to write an adult women.

Murphy is dead.  The living don't go to Valhalla. She died on a street in Chicago, killed by an idiot. She can no longer exercise free will.  She can't choose to stay or go. She exists in whatever form because Odin says so.

And Valhalla is for s**t.  Drafty halls, no internet,  the music blows and all the fellows think they are Odin's gift the to the softer side.
Title: Re: Is Murphy truly dead
Post by: Conspiracy Theorist on November 18, 2021, 08:52:59 PM
Are you calling Jim the Bloody God of the Dresdenverse, responsible, for torture, death and destruction?

Fair enough.
Title: Re: Is Murphy truly dead
Post by: Arjan on November 18, 2021, 09:01:11 PM
That is a matter of opinion, she tells Harry all the reasons why she won't give him back the Swords.
And at that moment in Cold Days she was completely right. I would not have given them back either.
Quote
Then she violates one of the main rules governing them.. 
The rules are hard to keep for most people, even for most knights. Failing does not make you hypocritical, it makes you human.

It is not that she preaches another set of morals for others than those for herself. She already told Harry why she did not want to become a knight because she had difficulty keeping those rules. She is actually very honest about it.

And she did not preach the morality of the swords. She just recognizes what it is and what the swords expect. She never claimed those morals were here morals, she actually said they were too difficult for her.
Quote
It isn't about her picking up the Sword, that doesn't make her hypocritical.. After her very long soliloquy implying if the Swords got back in Harry's hands they could be misused but if they stayed in her hands they wouldn't.. 
She tried to do what was best. The Harry in Cold Days is different from the Harry at the end of Skin Game. That Harry got the swords back.

The Harry in Cold Days was a terrible Harry. Denying him the swords was the right choice and she explained it well.


Quote
It isn't about her using the Sword, it is about how she used it. 
Failing does not make you hypocritical. Her emotions, her love for Harry, her anger just kicked in.

Hypocritical is about the morality you preach, and we have already seen she did not preach one, and the morality you live your life by.

She took the sword to save Harry.
Quote
Here is the definition of a hypocritical action;
When Nic surrendered, gave up both noose and coin, instead of accepting it as a Holy Knight, or knowing the rules for the Swords.. Judgement wasn't up to her, yet she felt that he should die, judged him, tried to kill him and broke the Sword.. That wasn't doing what she had to do, it was doing what she knew to be wrong after berating Harry
She did not berate Harry. She had the swords and she had to take a decision and she had to explain it. At that moment she did the correct thing. That does not mean she was the right knight material, that is why she did not take it up.

You forget Harry’s mental condition at that time and how Harry had warned everyone about what he would become.
Quote
about the rules governing the Swords and why they were better off in her hands.  That my friend is hypocritical.
Explaining the rules of the swords has nothing to do with explaining your personal morality. I think the rules of the swords are on purpose too difficult to achieve for most people. Understanding them is something else.

Quote
That has nothing to do with it, if it made anything clear, it was she had no business keeping the Swords once Harry came back.
In Cold Days? That is not realistic.

She did not preach for others another morality than she believed for herself.
Title: Re: Is Murphy truly dead
Post by: Avernite on November 18, 2021, 09:52:57 PM
So to sum up the original point, as I see it:

Murphy chose the morality of the Einherjar - face evil with a sword in hand and your love behind. That she did, many times.
The morality of TWG is to face human evil with love in your hand, and steel in your soul (the soulless evil can take a hike, apparently). That she didn't do as easy.

So while she did not choose after death to go be an einherjar, she chose it in LIFE. She chose to face Nick, with Sword in one hand, but not love in the other - perfect Einherjar, imperfect Holy Knight. She stood to defend Harry from Nick. And when the Jotuns came, though she shouldn't have, she stood with rocket launcher in hand and Harry behind. Perfect Einherjar, no points either way on the Knight scale.

And of course, at time TWG and his agents act as avenging angels instead, as at CI, or Michael after Nicks definitive refusal to repent in the vault. So they are not strangers entirely to the Einherjar mentality... which is why Uriel doesn't obliterate Odin for snatching souls, but has tea with him and discusses when a bared blade is more useful than an armed missionary.
Odin probably disagrees with Uriel on that, but when you have a universe-unmaker who disagrees with you but lets you do your thing... well even an Einherjar might make nice and be polite.
Title: Re: Is Murphy truly dead
Post by: Mira on November 18, 2021, 11:05:15 PM
Quote
She did not preach for others another morality than she believed for herself.

Yes, she did, in the beginning of Skin Game.. 
Quote
In Cold Days? That is not realistic.
Cold Days, I'd agree, but not in Skin Game.  And it really doesn't matter because she was preaching to him something she didn't believe herself, she made her own rules.
Quote
The rules are hard to keep for most people, even for most knights. Failing does not make you hypocritical, it makes you human.
Perhaps, but after she preached to Harry about not bringing the Sword.. She secretly brought it, that had nothing to do with failing, it had everything to do about thinking the rules didn't apply to her.
Taking it upon herself to judge Nic when she knew perfectly well it was against the rules had nothing to do with failing, but everything about believing the rules didn't apply to her.  She flat out tells Harry why she cannot be a Knight, she doesn't believe in It's rules.. Then she brings it, breaks the rules governing it, and breaks the Sword.

In other words, like the definition;
Quote
behaving in a way that suggests one has higher standards or more noble beliefs than is the case.
 

That is Murphy's actions in Skin Game in a nutshell...
Title: Re: Is Murphy truly dead
Post by: Conspiracy Theorist on November 19, 2021, 01:01:29 AM
Murphy had previously been a Knight of the Sword, a direct agent of the White God in whose faith she had been inculcated since birth. No wonder she thought she knew better than anyone else. A catholic true believer who had empirical evidence of God’s existence and her significant place in his plan. We are very lucky she didn’t go full Joan of Arc, as her plot Arc.

Except Harry too was an agent of the White God, gifted with Soul Fire which he continued to wield even Murphy had to put down the sword. Empirical evidence even to Murphy that Harry was worthy, which she chose to ignore.
Title: Re: Is Murphy truly dead
Post by: Arjan on November 19, 2021, 02:36:09 AM
Yes, she did, in the beginning of Skin Game..  Cold Days, I'd agree, but not in Skin Game.  And it really doesn't matter because she was preaching to him something she didn't believe herself, she made her own rules.Perhaps, but after she preached to Harry about not bringing the Sword.. She secretly brought it, that had nothing to do with failing, it had everything to do about thinking the rules didn't apply to her.
Taking it upon herself to judge Nic when she knew perfectly well it was against the rules had nothing to do with failing, but everything about believing the rules didn't apply to her.  She flat out tells Harry why she cannot be a Knight, she doesn't believe in It's rules.. Then she brings it, breaks the rules governing it, and breaks the Sword.

In other words, like the definition;
That is Murphy's actions in Skin Game in a nutshell...
Or she brought it because she hoped a knight would appear which in the end happened.

The point is she picked it up in desperation to save Harry and and did not know how to act correctly when she knew Nicodemus was not acting sincerely and the only safe action seemed to be to kill him. She made an error in a highly emotional situation but that does not mean she was hypocritical. It just meant she failed according to the swords rules exactly what she told Harry what could happen with herself.

The idea that she broke the rules deliberately because she thought the rules applied to everyone else but not to her is not supported by the text.

People make mistakes in highly emotional situations. That is all.

Hypocritical is basically a form of lying, a deception. A dishonesty. That is not supported by the text. Karen was honest to Harry.
Title: Re: Is Murphy truly dead
Post by: KurtinStGeorge on November 19, 2021, 04:22:21 AM
All I know is when Murphy reappears she will be PO'd. 

Murphy - "Harry, why didn't you tell me you talked to my father?"
Harry - "Hey Murph.  Ah, how did you know about that?  I thought you were in Valhalla."
Murphy - "Don't dodge the question mister.  OK, I am there most of the time, but Uriel gave my dad a job that took him to my neighborhood."
Bob - "Gee boss.  She even orders you around from the afterlife."
 
Title: Re: Is Murphy truly dead
Post by: Mira on November 19, 2021, 04:13:16 PM
Quote
The idea that she broke the rules deliberately because she thought the rules applied to everyone else but not to her is not supported by the text.

But it is, go back to Skin Game, Harry thinks the Swords need to be used if they were going to be successful on the mission.  Murphy argues all the reasons why they shouldn't be in addition to her not believing in those rules, that is why she cannot be a Knight.. Then hiding it, she brings the Sword of Faith along.  That is deliberately breaking the rules, or thinking they don't apply to her if she hides the Sword that somehow I don't know,maybe she thought doing that made her an unofficial Knight.
Quote
The point is she picked it up in desperation to save Harry and and did not know how to act correctly when she knew Nicodemus was not acting sincerely and the only safe action seemed to be to kill him. She made an error in a highly emotional situation but that does not mean she was hypocritical. It just meant she failed according to the swords rules exactly what she told Harry what could happen with herself.

Murphy is a trained cop, they are trained to function with their head, not their heart... Fact of the matter had she used her head, she would have accepted Nic's surrender, he would have been screwed and it would have been all over.  Instead she attempted what she said to Harry earlier, she didn't believe Nic or any other Denarian deserved a chance at redemption, so she tried to execute him instead and thus broke the Sword.  If she was doing it to save Harry, there is no evidence that if she had succeeded in killing Nic that Harry wouldn't have been killed anyway.
Quote
Hypocritical is basically a form of lying, a deception. A dishonesty. That is not supported by the text. Karen was honest to Harry.

Was she?  Why go on and on about why the Swords couldn't or shouldn't be used on the mission, then conceal it on her person and take it with?  That is being dishonest, maybe for what she thought were good reasons, but none the less, dishonest.
Title: Re: Is Murphy truly dead
Post by: Conspiracy Theorist on November 19, 2021, 04:38:36 PM
For Mira’s point remember Murphy was awake the shoe fetishist Anduriel was listening in on them all the time.

Her falsehood was likely for Anduriel’s benefit, it was her Goodman Grey, the Sword was disguised as a rocket launcher, something which could have killed Blood on his Soul (except maybe not given he was a Denarian on top of his own prodigious healing ability).

It’s exactly the same as Harry treated the Spear in BG, just as a common knife.
Title: Re: Is Murphy truly dead
Post by: Mira on November 19, 2021, 08:17:45 PM
Quote
For Mira’s point remember Murphy was awake the shoe fetishist Anduriel was listening in on them all the time.

Her falsehood was likely for Anduriel’s benefit, it was her Goodman Grey, the Sword was disguised as a rocket launcher, something which could have killed Blood on his Soul (except maybe not given he was a Denarian on top of his own prodigious healing ability).

I don't know if it exactly went like that, but you've solved the mystery of what happened that day.  Anduriel listening in on the conversation between Murphy and Harry, knew what was said and relayed it to Nic.  Andriel could also relay to Nic that Murphy had hidden the Sword in a rocket launcher case and taken it with her. With this information Nic could set up the breaking of a Holy Sword, while tip toeing up to the line, but never cross it as far as his bargain with Mab goes. Thus he planned and played Murphy to a tee so that she would produce the Sword and attack him.  Then knowing exactly what she'd do and what would happen to the Sword if she tried it, gave himself up to her.  It was the perfect plan to get a Holy Sword broken and Harry's right hand woman out of the picture.  What Nic hadn't planned for was how far Uriel was willing to go so that the mission would succeed.




Quote
It’s exactly the same as Harry treated the Spear in BG, just as a common knife.

No, he didn't.  He kept the Spear hidden and secret until he was ready to use it.  He had the tip of his staff remade to handle the Spear.. He never took it out to brandish it at anyone, and he was in plenty of fights with heavy weights up until he needed it to deal with Ethniu.