ParanetOnline

The Dresden Files => DF Spoilers => DF Reference Collection => Topic started by: Cenphx on February 11, 2013, 11:19:00 PM

Title: Proof that Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago?? (CD Spoilers)
Post by: Cenphx on February 11, 2013, 11:19:00 PM
         We learned from Odin that there are laws that govern the progression of time in relation to space. Altering the future is easier than changing one’s past, which is more than mildly difficult. Overcoming the inertia of an event to remain as it originally occurred requires tremendous energy, will and a measure of simple luck.

         The larger, more significant or more energy in the event, the more inertia it has to stay the same and the echoes caused by a temporal event are proportionately greater than the span of time that was bridged. If centuries are bridged, echoes begin far, far in advance. We see that the energy echoes happening in the day before the events at Demonreach allowed Harry to determine that the spell was being cast that same day or hours around that time.

         Now consider Little Chicago. If it had not been fixed, it would have exploded with tremendous energy. It would have killed Harry, so it was a significant event in his timeline. Therefore, it is a large, significant, energetic event with an equal amount of inertia working to keep it happening the same way. Therefore, if a time-traveling Harry went back into his own past to fix Little Chicago, which occurred 6 years ago in the Dresden Files timeline, at the very least we should have been seeing echoes 6 years before Proven Guilty, right? And the further in time we get from the fixing of LC to when we see TT Harry make the trip, the early the echoes should have started.

        In Cold Days, the echoes we saw from the events at Demonreach included an energy building up, like a steam boiler, that was going to explode and take out the midwest. I'm not sure what kind of echoes to look for from TT Harry stopping the explosion of LC and his own death, but I can't think of anything that would fit the bill.

       Does this sound a death knell for the idea that Time Travel Harry fixed Little Chicago? Can anyone think of potential echoes which prove that Harry did travel back in time and avert his own death??
Title: Re: Proof that Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago?? (CD Spoilers)
Post by: Elegast on February 11, 2013, 11:42:41 PM
       Does this sound a death knell for the idea that Time Travel Harry fixed Little Chicago?

No. TTH would not change the past as LC has already been fixed.
Title: Re: Proof that Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago?? (CD Spoilers)
Post by: wyltok on February 11, 2013, 11:47:15 PM
You're making the assumption that Future Dresden traveled to the past to change it, rather than Future Dresden traveled to the past to ensure everything happened the way it was meant to. Think Harry Potter and the Prisioner of Azkaban, where Potter makes the Stag Patronus that saves himself and Sirius from the Dementors.

If the situation here is like the one in Harry Potter, then the time travel is aligned with the temporal inertia, rather than against it, so there would be no temporal echoes in the past. Instead, the temporal echoes would occur near the time in the future where Dresden travels to the past, with the echoes being a result of the timeline changing if Dresden fails to do what he already did.
Title: Re: Proof that Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago?? (CD Spoilers)
Post by: raidem on February 11, 2013, 11:55:07 PM
Actually, I think you are correct Cenphx.  Time Traveling Harry could still be present but he wasn't the one that originally fixed Little Chicago.  Someone else did that.  It could be possible that he takes the place of the one who did fix it, which would require less effort.  Though that still begs the question as to who fixed it in the first place.
Odin, Mab, Mac, Rashid, Ebenezer, Langtry.  I'm sure one of those are our culprit.
Title: Re: Proof that Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago?? (CD Spoilers)
Post by: Ms Duck on February 12, 2013, 12:03:16 AM
Ill consider it proof.  ;D

for one thing, the amount of energy it takes to change anything in the past, from odins explanation, increases exponentially the farther into the future you are from.

its been over 7 years...

all the arguments for time traveling harry require he will some day agin godlike power, and I don't see that happening.
Title: Re: Proof that Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago?? (CD Spoilers)
Post by: Cenphx on February 12, 2013, 12:07:34 AM
You're making the assumption that Future Dresden traveled to the past to change it, rather than Future Dresden traveled to the past to ensure everything happened the way it was meant to. Think Harry Potter and the Prisioner of Azkaban, where Potter makes the Stag Patronus that saves himself and Sirius from the Dementors.

If the situation here is like the one in Harry Potter, then the time travel is aligned with the temporal inertia, rather than against it, so there would be no temporal echoes in the past. Instead, the temporal echoes would occur near the time in the future where Dresden travels to the past, with the echoes being a result of the timeline changing if Dresden fails to do what he already did.
Ugh, this is why I LOATHE time travel. I am admittedly horrible at reasoning this out. But let me try...

Ok, only one of two people could have changed LC in our example. Now Harry or Future Harry. We know Now Harry did not do it because Now Harry has no memory of doing so and we don’t watch him do so (though I guess he has “forgotten” things like ordering his own death and his blasting rod, so this may not be a safe assumption, but let’s table that for now).  Therefore, it is Future Harry which takes the actions changing LC (like in the example you used, it is Future Potter). If Future Harry does not act, then LC blows up.

If you say, well, Future Harry always was going to fix LC, so he is not changing the past, he is making it happen the way it was always supposed to, then there would be no such thing as changing the past because every action Future Person takes is always the action they would have taken and the past is never altered [/u]. Yet we know from Odin’s speech that such a thing is possible, though difficult.
Title: Re: Proof that Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago?? (CD Spoilers)
Post by: ReturnToOne on February 12, 2013, 12:07:56 AM
I thought the echo thing was unique to demon reach?
Title: Re: Proof that Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago?? (CD Spoilers)
Post by: Cenphx on February 12, 2013, 12:18:52 AM
I thought the echo thing was unique to demon reach?
Well, that description I put in the OP is pretty much word for word what Odin said to Harry at Mac's bar in Cold Days. It was definitely in the context of figuring out when the attack was going to happen at Demonreach, but I thought it was defining time travel generally, not a situation special or specific to the time travel sheninigans happening at DR. That was just my take on it though...
Title: Re: Proof that Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago?? (CD Spoilers)
Post by: Griffyn612 on February 12, 2013, 12:31:01 AM
Cold Days Incident
I'm one of the biggest TTH theory supporters around.  At least, I talk about it the most.  So understand that as I analyze your observation, I do so in a slightly biased fashion. 

First, my interpretation of what caused the build-up is different from what yours is.  You seem to think that the energy build-up felt on the island was due to someone messing with time.  My interpretation was that it was a build-up of energy by the attack that had already commenced.

See, Maeve and Lily both hit DR with a lot of power within a time-dilation field.  Harry and the Hunt were caught in the time-dilation field, and Odin Claus had to break them through it to get them there on time.  Once there, they battled the Outsiders first, and then went after the Ladies.

The Ladies had a good amount of time to attack DR.  Their attack was designed to hit DR not only in one place at one time, but at one place from multiple times.  That's the other purpose of the time-dilation they cast; it allowed their attack to happen simultaneously with other times.  That energy attack is what set off the build-up of energy felt by DR.  The build-up wasn't from the explosion of the island, or the time-stream trying to be changed; it was from the attack.  Bob himself showed a movie about it, where the attack was represented as a dissonance against the protection spells on the island.  It was that dissonance build-up that caused the flares which were felt on the island.

Since there's no time-dilating attack in PG, there wouldn't have to be a build-up like the one we saw on DR. 

Proven Guilty Incident
I understand your dilemma with the time-travel theory.  That if Harry travels back and fixes LC, but didn't fix it the first time, then we end up with a paradox/splinter universe, like Odin describes.

But the ANSWER has been provided in Cold Days!  (Ta-Da!)

Ready for it? 

Merlin didn't build the prison five times; he built it once at five times.

Harry doesn't travel back in time to fix LC; he creates a temporal joining between the two times, so that they occur together, just like Merlin did to create DR.

There was no first time when Harry didn't fix LC, or someone else did, because the first time the events of PG occur, Harry creates a temporal bridge with a future time, thus allowing it all to occur at the same time!

BOOM!!!!  Mind blown.
Title: Re: Proof that Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago?? (CD Spoilers)
Post by: Ms Duck on February 12, 2013, 12:33:33 AM
Problem

Merlin's power and skill >>>>>> Harry's

to the point im convinced Merlin was working for a cosmic level power when he did that; no mortal is capable of building a prison that can hold a titan.

your theory demands Harry gains godlike power. It always had. Im not ready to buy that yet.
Title: Re: Proof that Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago?? (CD Spoilers)
Post by: wyltok on February 12, 2013, 12:35:21 AM
I thought the echo thing was unique to demon reach?

Hm, I just re-read that section, and it seems I remembered how this works incorrectly. We are actually discussing two separate things.

- There is a law of conservation of history, what Odin calls temporal inertia. This makes changing the past considerably harder than changing the future.

- There is a secondary effect which is the temporal echoes. This effect always manifests for a longer time than the actual time gap that's bridged. Think of ripples in a pond, expanding from the point of impact.

The first element is fairly straightforward, as Elegast pointed out: If Future Harry always traveled to the past to fix LC, then there would be no going against temporary inertia. In which case, Cenphx later post would be correct: Future Dresden did not actually change the past. He merely travelled in time. In time travel, this is known as a time loop. This is considered a paradox, because it means that the knowledge about the flaw in Little Chicago literally appeared out of nowhere (onthological paradox).

Paradoxes aside, it's worth keeping in mind that just because one can travel to the past and not change it does not mean that one cannot travel to the past and change; one thing does not exclude the other (just because some balloons are blue does not mean all balloons are blue).

Now, the temporal echoes or ripples are definitely a bigger problem than I originally thought. From how Odin describes them, they always happen, whether you're traveling forwards or backwards in time. This would imply that the ripples travel in both directions along the timeline, I think? Though there's no mention of echoes after the dawn of November 1st...

The other point regarding the echoes is the magnitude of them, as Cenphx originally pointed out. For a multi-state explosion, the echoes were appropriately massive. I have to agree with the OP: I have no idea what the echoes of a time-travelling Harry would be.

... time travel is confusing.
Title: Re: Proof that Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago?? (CD Spoilers)
Post by: Griffyn612 on February 12, 2013, 12:47:32 AM
Problem

Merlin's power and skill >>>>>> Harry's

to the point im convinced Merlin was working for a cosmic level power when he did that; no mortal is capable of building a prison that can hold a titan.

your theory demands Harry gains godlike power. It always had. Im not ready to buy that yet.

Ah, but Odin himself in CD says that "bridging a temporal gap of any length is something utterly beyond the reach of any mortal practitioner acting alone."

Merlin is/was mortal.  So he couldn't have done it alone.  And Odin proves both knowledge of temporal bridges and practical use of temporal bridges in CD.

My bet is Odin helped Merlin, since Odin taught him to begin with, and Odin knows so much about DR.  Team effort?  I'd say so.

So who's to say at some future point, there isn't a situation that arises where Odin agrees that Harry needs to go back and 'bridge' the two separate times for something to happen?

Or Mab, for that matter.  If Maeve and Lily can work together to create a temporal-distortion around DR, then Mab could probably arrange it. 
Title: Re: Proof that Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago?? (CD Spoilers)
Post by: Cenphx on February 12, 2013, 01:02:56 AM
Cold Days Incident
I'm one of the biggest TTH theory supporters around.  At least, I talk about it the most.  So understand that as I analyze your observation, I do so in a slightly biased fashion. 

First, my interpretation of what caused the build-up is different from what yours is.  You seem to think that the energy build-up felt on the island was due to someone messing with time.  My interpretation was that it was a build-up of energy by the attack that had already commenced.

See, Maeve and Lily both hit DR with a lot of power within a time-dilation field.  Harry and the Hunt were caught in the time-dilation field, and Odin Claus had to break them through it to get them there on time.  Once there, they battled the Outsiders first, and then went after the Ladies.

The Ladies had a good amount of time to attack DR.  Their attack was designed to hit DR not only in one place at one time, but at one place from multiple times.  That's the other purpose of the time-dilation they cast; it allowed their attack to happen simultaneously with other times.  That energy attack is what set off the build-up of energy felt by DR.  The build-up wasn't from the explosion of the island, or the time-stream trying to be changed; it was from the attack.  Bob himself showed a movie about it, where the attack was represented as a dissonance against the protection spells on the island.  It was that dissonance build-up that caused the flares which were felt on the island.

Since there's no time-dilating attack in PG, there wouldn't have to be a build-up like the one we saw on DR. 


Well, to be honest, as I was writing the OP, I realized that I didn’t really understand/recall enough about what the heck all was going on with time and energy at Demonreach.  But I kinda figured that for purposes of this post, I didn’t need to have the intricacies of what was happening there down pat, because I was relying on what Odin explained about how time travel wherein you change the past means that you cause temporal echoes. For the Little Chicago example, we are talking about changing the past (aside from the arguments against whether this is really changing the past or merely assuring it, as Elegast and wyltok were noting) and THAT would cause the temporal echoes Odin described, regardless of whether time travel was involved with DR.  So I guess I was hoping to skirt my non-understanding of the precise nature of what was happening at Demonreach.

But let’s talk about it for a second. You are saying the energy buildup which was going to cause the explosion Molly was talking to Harry when he first gets to Chicago is NOT due to someone futzing with time but is a result of the spell Maeve and Lily were performing, if I understand you correctly. But how is it that the energy buildup had already started before Harry even met with Molly? Remember Molly had already been talking to Lea about it, so not necessarily days or anything, but people were noticing the energy backlash definitely some time before that night at Demonreach. I noticed that you said their (Maeve/Lily’s) attack was happening simultaneously with other times. I could see that. But it couldn’t have been happening as early as when Molly noticed the energy building up, because didn’t Harry met with both Maeve and Lilly at the Botanical Gardens after that?   
Title: Re: Proof that Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago?? (CD Spoilers)
Post by: Cenphx on February 12, 2013, 01:12:25 AM
Cold Days Incident
Proven Guilty Incident
I understand your dilemma with the time-travel theory.  That if Harry travels back and fixes LC, but didn't fix it the first time, then we end up with a paradox/splinter universe, like Odin describes.

But the ANSWER has been provided in Cold Days!  (Ta-Da!)

Ready for it? 

Merlin didn't build the prison five times; he built it once at five times.

Harry doesn't travel back in time to fix LC; he creates a temporal joining between the two times, so that they occur together, just like Merlin did to create DR.

There was no first time when Harry didn't fix LC, or someone else did, because the first time the events of PG occur, Harry creates a temporal bridge with a future time, thus allowing it all to occur at the same time!

BOOM!!!!  Mind blown.
Hmm...I guess when I was imagining Merlin creating DR, I picture it as there was one Merlin existing in one place which happened to be a joining of 5 different times, like he had folded time like a ribbon and the spot where the folds were held together was were he was standing when he worked the magic to create Demonreach. So it was one Merlin at five different points in time, but at the same time.

But that doesn't work for the Little Chicago example, because even if you folded time to make the future and the time of Proven Guilty touch, there would be 2 Harrys in existence at the time LC was fixed,  the one who knows it was being fixed and our Harry who had no idea.
Title: Re: Proof that Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago?? (CD Spoilers)
Post by: Ms Duck on February 12, 2013, 01:17:06 AM
Ah, but Odin himself in CD says that "bridging a temporal gap of any length is something utterly beyond the reach of any mortal practitioner acting alone."

Merlin is/was mortal.  So he couldn't have done it alone.  And Odin proves both knowledge of temporal bridges and practical use of temporal bridges in CD.

My bet is Odin helped Merlin, since Odin taught him to begin with, and Odin knows so much about DR.  Team effort?  I'd say so.

So who's to say at some future point, there isn't a situation that arises where Odin agrees that Harry needs to go back and 'bridge' the two separate times for something to happen?

Or Mab, for that matter.  If Maeve and Lily can work together to create a temporal-distortion around DR, then Mab could probably arrange it.

sorry griff, I doubt Odin's that strong. we are talking white god level, there. ;)

a Titan could take out Odin or Mab by sneezing hard. Odin is in the category of 'can walk around fine on earth without causing so much as a temperature change' -- he nowhere near that level.
Title: Re: Proof that Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago?? (CD Spoilers)
Post by: Griffyn612 on February 12, 2013, 01:28:40 AM
But let’s talk about it for a second. You are saying the energy buildup which was going to cause the explosion Molly was talking to Harry when he first gets to Chicago is NOT due to someone futzing with time but is a result of the spell Maeve and Lily were performing, if I understand you correctly. But how is it that the energy buildup had already started before Harry even met with Molly? Remember Molly had already been talking to Lea about it, so not necessarily days or anything, but people were noticing the energy backlash definitely some time before that night at Demonreach. I noticed that you said their (Maeve/Lily’s) attack was happening simultaneously with other times. I could see that. But it couldn’t have been happening as early as when Molly noticed the energy building up, because didn’t Harry met with both Maeve and Lilly at the Botanical Gardens after that?

The time at which the attack commenced was the night of December 31st.  From that place and time, Maeve and Lily created a time-distortion field.  Their attack then branched out through time, attacking from multiple times.  That's how Bob describes the attack early in CD.  In doing so, it impacted the wards at DR, which then caused the ripples which everyone sensed.

Hmm...I guess when I was imagining Merlin creating DR, I picture it as there was one Merlin existing in one place which happened to be a joining of 5 different times, like he had folded time like a ribbon and the spot where the folds were held together was were he was standing when he worked the magic to create Demonreach. So it was one Merlin at five different points in time, but at the same time.

But that doesn't work for the Little Chicago example, because even if you folded time to make the future and the time of Proven Guilty touch, there would be 2 Harrys in existence at the time LC was fixed,  the one who knows it was being fixed and our Harry who had no idea.

I agree with your Merlin/ribbon analogy.  Merlin folded 5 times together, so that there was one place experiencing all 5 times at once.  There was one Merlin completing the work at DR.  That doesn't mean that there wasn't another Merlin at any of those times.

If Harry folds time (with Odin's help) so that the events of PG are bridged to another time, then there's a chance Harry can exist as two people in the same place in the same time(s).  And because the times were linked with a temporal bridge, there wasn't a time when they weren't. 

It's beyond Harry's ability, and may even be beyond what Merlin did.  We don't know if his five times were all present and future, or if some were past as well.  But if there's a way to link a place between two times, then it could explain how Harry could exist as two different people the one and only time that time occurs.

sorry griff, I doubt Odin's that strong. we are talking white god level, there. ;)

a Titan could take out Odin or Mab by sneezing hard. Odin is in the category of 'can walk around fine on earth without causing so much as a temperature change' -- he nowhere near that level.

So by your estimate, Merlin was TWG?  How did he do it? 
Title: Re: Proof that Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago?? (CD Spoilers)
Post by: TheCuriousFan on February 12, 2013, 01:32:07 AM
Problem

Merlin's power and skill >>>>>> Harry's

to the point im convinced Merlin was working for a cosmic level power when he did that; no mortal is capable of building a prison that can hold a titan.

your theory demands Harry gains godlike power. It always had. Im not ready to buy that yet.

Didn't Harry point out that the power requirements to make Demonreach aren't that much more than what he can do?
Title: Re: Proof that Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago?? (CD Spoilers)
Post by: Ben de Wal on February 12, 2013, 01:38:22 AM
Harry couldn't power up the first layer of wards on one stone which had  many layers of wards  on his best day according to bob
Title: Re: Proof that Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago?? (CD Spoilers)
Post by: TheCuriousFan on February 12, 2013, 01:40:46 AM
Harry couldn't power up the first layer of wards on one stone which had  many layers of wards  on his best day according to bob

I was talking about when Demonreach explained through Bob how the island was made. I'm not at home so I can't get the exact quote.
Title: Re: Proof that Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago?? (CD Spoilers)
Post by: rekshek on February 12, 2013, 01:43:38 AM
I was talking about when Demonreach explained through Bob how the island was made. I'm not at home so I can't get the exact quote.

He said the power he could match, but the complexity of the system was beyond even Bob.
Title: Re: Proof that Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago?? (CD Spoilers)
Post by: Second Aristh on February 12, 2013, 01:47:39 AM
I was talking about when Demonreach explained through Bob how the island was made. I'm not at home so I can't get the exact quote.
I'm guessing that these are the quotes in question.



Quote from: Cold Days Chapter 15
"They're powerful," he said.  "I can tell you that much.  But they're also complex.  I mean, like, Molly on her best day could not come close to weaving together something this crazy.  You on your best day could not sling around enough power to juice up one of the smallest stones.  And that's just the first layer.  I think there are more.  Maybe a lot more.  Uh, like hundreds."

Quote from: Cold Days Chapter 17
"These," Bob said, "represent the original enchantments on the island.  This is vastly simplified, of course, but the basic star-and-circle architecture is the same as the work you do, Harry."
Title: Re: Proof that Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago?? (CD Spoilers)
Post by: TheCuriousFan on February 12, 2013, 01:47:53 AM
He said the power he could match, but the complexity of the system was beyond even Bob.

I know that, I was arguing with Ms Duck's claim that Demonreach would require godlike amounts of power to make. The skill required is completely beyond Harry for the foreseeable future though.
Title: Re: Proof that Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago?? (CD Spoilers)
Post by: TheCuriousFan on February 12, 2013, 01:48:55 AM
I'm guessing that these are the quotes in question.

No, I was talking about the ones from the conversation with Demonreach down in the Well. Not Harry and Bob's first impressions. Still, thank you for trying.
Title: Re: Proof that Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago?? (CD Spoilers)
Post by: Ms Duck on February 12, 2013, 01:49:09 AM
its not just the prison you've got to consider:

- a prisons wall have to be strong enough to hold the prisoners. Some of them are likely Titans, or worse.

- the prison all has to be strong enough to contain their natures. If having someone of titan class (mother winter) on earth is enough to accidentally flatten the planet, how strong does a shield to contain that have to be?

 - Merlin cast the spell that made the outer ward. I doubt he built the whole thing; for one point , DR itself is much older then the ward is.
Title: Re: Proof that Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago?? (CD Spoilers)
Post by: Ben de Wal on February 12, 2013, 01:50:24 AM
iirc it said something about the spells feed and growing strong  of each other
Title: Re: Proof that Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago?? (CD Spoilers)
Post by: Cenphx on February 12, 2013, 01:50:47 AM
The time at which the attack commenced was the night of December 31st.  From that place and time, Maeve and Lily created a time-distortion field.  Their attack then branched out through time, attacking from multiple times.  That's how Bob describes the attack early in CD.  In doing so, it impacted the wards at DR, which then caused the ripples which everyone sensed.

Ok, I think I'm pretty much with you. But if Maeve/Lily's time-dilation spell, which only slowed time down for a few seconds or a few minutes or distorted it right where they were casting, created enough feedback to echo for at least a day before the event in question, I still find it hard to believe that Merlin or Harry folding time wouldn't create any temporal disturbance at all.

And I don't think the echoes from what Maeve and Lily were doing had anything to do with Demonreach's wards, mainly because Odin's description of the temporal echoes didn't specify that it would only occur at special places or special circumstances; the echoes seemed pretty universal.

Title: Re: Proof that Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago?? (CD Spoilers)
Post by: TheCuriousFan on February 12, 2013, 01:52:18 AM
This ridiculous level of power that the upper tier supernatural creatures possess raises an interesting question.

If the various upper tier supernatural creatures have to spend large amounts on Earth and throw down with various other similarly strong entities, what effects will it have on reality and Earth? That many creatures capable of rewriting the laws of reality throwing down cannot be good for it.
Title: Re: Proof that Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago?? (CD Spoilers)
Post by: Griffyn612 on February 12, 2013, 02:06:56 AM
Ok, I think I'm pretty much with you. But if Maeve/Lily's time-dilation spell, which only slowed time down for a few seconds or a few minutes or distorted it right where they were casting, created enough feedback to echo for at least a day before the event in question, I still find it hard to believe that Merlin or Harry folding time wouldn't create any temporal disturbance at all.

And I don't think the echoes from what Maeve and Lily were doing had anything to do with Demonreach's wards, mainly because Odin's description of the temporal echoes didn't specify that it would only occur at special places or special circumstances; the echoes seemed pretty universal.

The time-dilation itself is used to attack the island at multiple times.  In doing so, it sets off wards that Merlin laid across space-time.  The time-dilation doesn't cause the echoes; the energy shot through the time-dilation causes the echos.  If Harry/Merlin/Odin/Anyone folds time, it doesn't create energy like the attack.

You're too hung up on Odin's description.  Look at what Bob says, based on what DR tells him.
Statement:  “Someone hits the island with energy, Harry. But they’ve figured out how Merlin put this place together. They aren’t attacking it in three dimensions. They’re attacking in four. They’re sending power through time as well as through space.”
Analysis:  Maeve and Lily hit the island with energy.  They hit it in multiple times using the time distortion field.

Statement: “What the island is experiencing now is the echo of the moment that burst of energy strikes it,” Bob said. “Only instead of the echo happening after, it’s happening first.”
Analysis:  The attack, which has not started at that time, is already impacting the wards at that time, due to the time-dilation.

Statement:  Then I saw the dissonance appear. Bob had chosen to show it as a sullen red light that began to pulse lightly at the westernmost edges of the great design. It began as something faint, but then, like an oncoming headache, started to throb into something larger and more noticeable. Where scarlet and blue light touched, there were ugly flares of energy— flares that I had been sensing ever since I’d gotten to the island. Before long, that scarlet pulse had spread to half the island, and then, abruptly, the screen went white.
Analysis:  The dissonance is the energy coming from the attack.  It hits the wards across time, causing the scarlet pulses in the example, which Harry confirms are the same flares he's been sensing, and likely the others have as well.

its not just the prison you've got to consider:

- a prisons wall have to be strong enough to hold the prisoners. Some of them are likely Titans, or worse.

- the prison all has to be strong enough to contain their natures. If having someone of titan class (mother winter) on earth is enough to accidentally flatten the planet, how strong does a shield to contain that have to be?

 - Merlin cast the spell that made the outer ward. I doubt he built the whole thing; for one point , DR itself is much older then the ward is.

DR is the genus loci for the island.  But Bob clearly states in CD, based on the info DR gives him, that Merlin created the prison.
 - “Merlin didn’t build the prison five times,” Bob said. “He built it once. In five different times. All at the same time.”

This ridiculous level of power that the upper tier supernatural creatures possess raises an interesting question.

If the various upper tier supernatural creatures have to spend large amounts on Earth and throw down with various other similarly strong entities, what effects will it have on reality and Earth? That many creatures capable of rewriting the laws of reality throwing down cannot be good for it.

Odin said it best.
 - “It is the only way,” Vadderung said. “If anyone managed to set free the things in the Well  .  .  .”
   “Seems like it would be bad,” I said.
   “Not bad,” Vadderung said. “The end.”
Title: Re: Proof that Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago?? (CD Spoilers)
Post by: TheCuriousFan on February 12, 2013, 02:11:32 AM
Odin said it best.
 - “It is the only way,” Vadderung said. “If anyone managed to set free the things in the Well  .  .  .”
   “Seems like it would be bad,” I said.
   “Not bad,” Vadderung said. “The end.”

I was thinking more about the BAT and the Outsiders attacking Earth when I made that statement, but I suppose those guys getting out (or being pointed at the Outsiders) would cause major problems for reality like Odin said.
Title: Re: Proof that Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago?? (CD Spoilers)
Post by: Griffyn612 on February 12, 2013, 02:15:16 AM
I was thinking more about the BAT and the Outsiders attacking Earth when I made that statement, but I suppose those guys getting out (or being pointed at the Outsiders) would cause major problems for reality like Odin said.

If there's a full prison break, I don't know that reality could withstand it, based on what's been said by JB about power levels and walking in reality.  The BAT may be the Gates falling, or a couple of inmates breaking free to set off something.  But a full prison break is probably game over, period.

P.S.  Since there's no way of knowing when the earliest time was that Merlin created the prison, then we can't be sure Merlin didn't actually create DR.  If he traveled back in time far enough, then DR might not have manifested as a genus loci prior to the prison's creation.  It might have been Merlin's actions that helped bring about the DR manifestation of a genus loci. 
Title: Re: Proof that Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago?? (CD Spoilers)
Post by: Ms Duck on February 12, 2013, 02:31:42 AM
Please note, DR told Bob very diluted information, who then told Harry very diluted information, who then told US very diluted information.

and there is no reason to assume DR told anything close to the whole truth. And plenty to assume much of the island is on a need to know basis.

Title: Re: Proof that Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago?? (CD Spoilers)
Post by: the neurovore of Zur-En-Aargh on February 12, 2013, 02:35:27 AM
If you say, well, Future Harry always was going to fix LC, so he is not changing the past, he is making it happen the way it was always supposed to, then there would be no such thing as changing the past because every action Future Person takes is always the action they would have taken and the past is never altered [/u]. Yet we know from Odin’s speech that such a thing is possible, though difficult.

Why would we assume that closed time-travel loops and altering the past can't both happen in the same universe ?
Title: Re: Proof that Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago?? (CD Spoilers)
Post by: the neurovore of Zur-En-Aargh on February 12, 2013, 02:37:22 AM
sorry griff, I doubt Odin's that strong. we are talking white god level, there. ;)

I remain to be convinced that what's needed here is brute strength rather than moderate strength plus significant skill and smarts.
Title: Re: Proof that Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago?? (CD Spoilers)
Post by: the neurovore of Zur-En-Aargh on February 12, 2013, 02:38:38 AM
The time at which the attack commenced was the night of December 31st.  From that place and time, Maeve and Lily created a time-distortion field.  Their attack then branched out through time, attacking from multiple times.  That's how Bob describes the attack early in CD.  In doing so, it impacted the wards at DR, which then caused the ripples which everyone sensed.

Are we absolutely sure that by the end of CD every level of that attack on Demonreach has been countered ? That there aren't other components further in the past or future ?
Title: Re: Proof that Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago?? (CD Spoilers)
Post by: the neurovore of Zur-En-Aargh on February 12, 2013, 02:43:24 AM
- a prisons wall have to be strong enough to hold the prisoners. Some of them are likely Titans, or worse.

The metaphor to come to mind here is Marcone's pit at the end of FM.  Seems to me that the wall of that, being soft mud with no traction, would stop a loup-garou climibing out as easily as it stops Harry.  Brute strength is again not the only way.

Quote
- the prison all has to be strong enough to contain their natures. If having someone of titan class (mother winter) on earth is enough to accidentally flatten the planet, how strong does a shield to contain that have to be?

We see in TC that the skinwalker has a minor reality-warping effect; it is how Harry realises there's something to look at with his Sight, right at the beginning. We see DR containing that easily.

I don't suspect strong shields.  I suspect constrant draining, into leylines, and possibly also into the NN.

Quote
- Merlin cast the spell that made the outer ward. I doubt he built the whole thing; for one point , DR itself is much older then the ward is.

An asserion which seems premature when we only have a lower bound for how far Merlin traveled through time.
Title: Re: Proof that Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago?? (CD Spoilers)
Post by: Griffyn612 on February 12, 2013, 02:44:21 AM
Please note, DR told Bob very diluted information, who then told Harry very diluted information, who then told US very diluted information.

and there is no reason to assume DR told anything close to the whole truth. And plenty to assume much of the island is on a need to know basis.

So no explanation as to how Merlin got TWG level help to create the prison?  Or are you now thinking Merlin didn't create it at all, since we can't trust anything that's been said?

I remain to be convinced that what's needed here is brute strength rather than moderate strength plus significant skill and smarts.

I think what you and TCF are both elluding to is the fact that Harry and Bob were both overwealmed at the wards and enchantments they saw, but with the explanation of time adding to them, they're something reasonably possible.  Still out of Harry's skill-range, but not far out of his power range.

Quote
The spells powering the actual construction of it hadn’t been, alone, too much stronger than some of the work I had done— but when they’d been interconnected with their counterparts across time, they’d fed upon one another, created a perfect resonance of energy that had become something infinitely greater than the sum of its parts.

Are we absolutely sure that by the end of CD every level of that attack on Demonreach has been countered ? That there aren't other components further in the past or future ?

By Odin's description, the echoes of the attack could only happen in a short time around the attack itself.  And there was only evidence of the one attack occurring, which then crossed multiple times.  If the attack were still happening across time, then the echoes would be felt.  But if the attack is only happening at one time, no echoes would be felt, but apparently wouldn't be enough to actually damage the wards.
Title: Re: Proof that Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago?? (CD Spoilers)
Post by: TheCuriousFan on February 12, 2013, 02:49:40 AM
I think what you and TCF are both elluding to is the fact that Harry and Bob were both overwealmed at the wards and enchantments they saw, but with the explanation of time adding to them, they're something reasonably possible.  Still out of Harry's skill-range, but not far out of his power range.

Yes, thank you for providing the quote.
Title: Re: Proof that Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago?? (CD Spoilers)
Post by: Cenphx on February 12, 2013, 03:50:32 AM
@Gryffin612 -- ahh, I had completely forgotten Bob's depcition of that spell interacting with DR's wards. You're right. Thanks for including the quotes.                                                               @ neurovore -- re closed time travel loops and altering the past. I've never considered in much detail the paradoxes of time travel or how to resolve them, so im just muddling through here. In fact, I had to check whether closed time travel loop was the same as what I said about the idea you dont actually alter the past because whatever you do in the past is what you always did so nothing changes. Im not saying I subscribe to that theory, but isnt it by definiton mutually exclusive of being able to alter the past?
Title: Re: Proof that Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago?? (CD Spoilers)
Post by: Ms Duck on February 12, 2013, 04:05:44 AM
The metaphor to come to mind here is Marcone's pit at the end of FM.  Seems to me that the wall of that, being soft mud with no traction, would stop a loup-garou climibing out as easily as it stops Harry.  Brute strength is again not the only way.

We see in TC that the skinwalker has a minor reality-warping effect; it is how Harry realises there's something to look at with his Sight, right at the beginning. We see DR containing that easily.

I don't suspect strong shields.  I suspect constrant draining, into leylines, and possibly also into the NN.

An asserion which seems premature when we only have a lower bound for how far Merlin traveled through time.

the problem is when you realize how strong the reality warping of even a single titan would be; the effect Is so much greater then a shaggy its not even funny. Mab, just by herself, caused near global climate change.

A Titan? eurk.

I dont see how you can drain that into the environment in any way worth while there. Be like trying to channel a flood with a silly straw

as to the WG, im saying things like him may have been involved. We know, for example, that its wasn't merlin who beat the titans and imprisoned them, it was the Greek gods.

seems a lot more likely Merlin was working for someone , to me

there is a major logic problem in saying 'Harry can time travel, because Merlin can do it.' .. kind of like saying 'the space shuttle can destroy planets, because the death star can'.. yea, sure, they are both space ships but we have a small problem of scale here...
Title: Re: Proof that Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago?? (CD Spoilers)
Post by: Griffyn612 on February 12, 2013, 04:15:19 AM
@Gryffin612 -- ahh, I had completely forgotten Bob's depcition of that spell interacting with DR's wards. You're right. Thanks for including the quotes.                                                               @ neurovore -- re closed time travel loops and altering the past. I've never considered in much detail the paradoxes of time travel or how to resolve them, so im just muddling through here. In fact, I had to check whether closed time travel loop was the same as what I said about the idea you dont actually alter the past because whatever you do in the past is what you always did so nothing changes. Im not saying I subscribe to that theory, but isnt it by definiton mutually exclusive of being able to alter the past?

Personally I hate time travel plots, and honestly don't even truly believe that TTH as I've described it will happen.

BUT, saying it does, the issue always seems to be, what happened first?  If Harry had to travel back to fix LC, then who fixed it the first time?  Why didn't they fix it the second time?  Did Harry do something that screwed up the other person's actions, and he had to fulfill it himself?  Or did it not get fixed the first time?  Thus, Harry would have died, so how did the reality where Harry didn't die come about?

The only happy answer I can see is the temporal bridge theory, where the two times are linked together at a place for a duration (time).  But the issue with that theory is this: How does Harry leave the bridged location, and if he does, what determines which time he enters?

Let's say that the physical location of the bridge is on DR.  A bridge would be built at that location, making both times occur at once at that location.  It'd be the same thing Merlin did at the same location. 

But then if Harry walks out of the temporal bridge area, what determines the outside time he walks in to?  It would have to be the PG time or the future time.  Would there be refractal portals that he could choose from?  Presumably there would also be a time-limit that the bridge could last.  That would be a good plot point, in that if Harry misses it, he's stuck reliving the past from the shadows, in fear of changing anything and destroying reality.

That's why time travel is so difficult.  I haven't figured it out yet myself, or I would already be a google/apple millionaire.

the problem is when you realize how strong the reality warping of even a single titan would be; the effect Is so much greater then a shaggy its not even funny. Mab, just by herself, caused near global climate change.

A Titan? eurk.

I dont see how you can drain that into the environment in any way worth while there. Be like trying to channel a flood with a silly straw

as to the WG, im saying things like him may have been involved. We know, for example, that its wasn't merlin who beat the titans and imprisoned them, it was the Greek gods.

seems a lot more likely Merlin was working for someone , to me

there is a major logic problem in saying 'Harry can time travel, because Merlin can do it.' .. kind of like saying 'the space shuttle can destroy planets, because the death star can'.. yea, sure, they are both space ships but we have a small problem of scale here...

I honestly don't see what would prevent Harry from doing what Merlin did, especially if Merlin had outside help.  Whether it requires a Fae Queen, a Norse god, or a meddlesome Archangel, Harry could get the help needed if it was truly needed. 

And if Harry did it, he would be working for someone.  He wouldn't do it himself; I've never thought that would be the case.  At times I've theorized Mab or the Gatekeeper helping him find a way to do it.  Now that we know Merlin was able to do it once for 5 times, imagining Harry doing it once with 2 times isn't so outrageous to me. 

The temporal bridge theory allows for a possible means, but not a motive.  I'm still lost as to why Harry would need to go back.  Some speculate to use LilC, but I can't see where it would be easier for gods and queens to work together to send him back, rather than simply help him rebuild a new LilC.  It has to be something specific to that time-frame.  I've speculated that it was to find out who attacked AT or such, but that's not enough.
Title: Re: Proof that Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago?? (CD Spoilers)
Post by: wizard nelson on February 12, 2013, 05:32:45 AM
i will remind you of the Novikov self-consistency principle of time travel. NOTHING is proven or disproven till its explained in a book.
Title: Re: Proof that Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago?? (CD Spoilers)
Post by: wyltok on February 12, 2013, 01:00:24 PM
i will remind you of the Novikov self-consistency principle of time travel. NOTHING is proven or disproven till its explained in a book.

I'm afraid that the Novikov self-consistency principle has been proven in the book to not apply to prophecy / foresight. Examples include:

- The prophecy in Death Masks only included two alternatives: Harry dies, or the Knights all die. Neither of these happens.

- Abby replied to a question before he got a chance to make it, and her reply stopped him from making it. Meaning, the timeline where he asked the question never happened in the first place.

- The Gatekeeper used some sort of ability to determine Harry's chances near the end of Turn Coat. This ability gave two different results. If the ability is foresight / time-based (as the dialogue in that scene implies) then it saw two different futures.

Now, what the Novikov self-consistency conjecture states is that only close time loops can happen. But proving that this conjecture is false does not automatically mean that close time loops can't happen, only that they aren't the only alternative.

It's still possible that the Little Chicago situation is a closed time loop. As an example, I'm fairly certain that what Merlin did when he created the Well qualifies as a closed time loop.
Title: Re: Proof that Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago?? (CD Spoilers)
Post by: wizard nelson on February 12, 2013, 02:06:36 PM
Quote
I'm afraid that the Novikov self-consistency principle has been proven in the book to not apply to prophecy / foresight. Examples include:
and at what point did i mention forsight? :o as you pointed out merlin already created a time loop ergo in the DV the principle is viable.
Title: Re: Proof that Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago?? (CD Spoilers)
Post by: wyltok on February 12, 2013, 02:23:11 PM
and at what point did i mention forsight? :o as you pointed out merlin already created a time loop ergo in the DV the principle is viable.

Whoops, you're right. I combined what you said in two separate topics. My most heartfelt apologies. Still, how can you say the self-consistency conjecture applies (which states that only time travel that does not change the past is possible) when Odin states that changing the past is possible, but just takes considerable more effort (and luck) than changing the future? The two principles seem to be mutually exclusive...
Title: Re: Proof that Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago?? (CD Spoilers)
Post by: robertltux on February 12, 2013, 02:45:18 PM
So no explanation as to how Merlin got TWG level help to create the prison?  Or are you now thinking Merlin didn't create it at all, since we can't trust anything that's been said?

Im thinking its like a Thermite reaction. all you need to kick off a FO/AL reaction is a sparkler (which can be ignited by a match) but you could end up with a truck being turned into a blob of metal.
Title: Re: Proof that Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago?? (CD Spoilers)
Post by: wizard nelson on February 12, 2013, 02:56:51 PM
Whoops, you're right. I combined what you said in two separate topics. My most heartfelt apologies. Still, how can you say the self-consistency conjecture applies (which states that only time travel that does not change the past is possible) when Odin states that changing the past is possible, but just takes considerable more effort (and luck) than changing the future? The two principles seem to be mutually exclusive...
not to me? either you loop time or you shift its direction? pretty sure merlin did both. created a loop in which he created DR and altered time by creating DR. the only thing this does is create  parallels in which he never made DR and 'prime' in which he did. the only time travel mechanism i don't believe applies is paradox, for the same reason odin gives, we're still here. it seems a given warlocks used to muck with time pre-WC so i'd imagine 'paradox' would have happened if it were possible, or it did
Title: Re: Proof that Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago?? (CD Spoilers)
Post by: wizard nelson on February 12, 2013, 02:59:02 PM
(continuation) happen but only that reality exploded and everything was shunted sideways to a parallel without any awareness.
i'm almost certain DR was created on loop because bob mentions that trying to measure DR would irrevocably change its measurements. i can't remember what principle this is ot why its important right now though (its ten A.M here and i'm a total insomiac zombie right now)
Title: Re: Proof that Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago?? (CD Spoilers)
Post by: Griffyn612 on February 12, 2013, 03:56:22 PM
not to me? either you loop time or you shift its direction? pretty sure merlin did both. created a loop in which he created DR and altered time by creating DR. the only thing this does is create  parallels in which he never made DR and 'prime' in which he did. the only time travel mechanism i don't believe applies is paradox, for the same reason odin gives, we're still here. it seems a given warlocks used to muck with time pre-WC so i'd imagine 'paradox' would have happened if it were possible, or it did

The whole point of the loop/bridge time-travel concept proposed here is that there wouldn't be a time where it didn't happen. 

From Uriel's perspective, time is not linear.  Stand back far enough, and it's apparently wibbly wobbly.  By creating a permanent temporal bridge, those 5 times are linked to occur at the same time the first time.  There was no time he didn't make the prison.

Picture a piece of string.  It's linear, as mortals see time.  Now imagine that Merlin got help creating a loop, where two parts of the string overlap, like this:
(http://www.stringpage.com/blog/photos/weave01-20070826.jpg)

Where the string overlaps itself is two separate points of time.  Now imagine a pin getting pushed through the string, bonding the two points together.  That makes them permanently bound together.  Only instead of just one loop for two points, there are 4 loops for 5 points of time.

The reason Ms Duck has an issue with it is because messing with time like that would seem to be a very high-level trick.  She thinks that it would take a WG-level talent to do it.

But Merlin clearly did it, presumably with help.  We can either assume that TWG helped, but if so, why did TWG both involving a mortal at all?  Or we can assume that one or multiple lower-tier powers (Mab, Odin, Uriel) worked together to do it. 

We know that the Ladies working together were able to channel their attack across multiple times.  So the idea that there are time-travel capabilities among the powers isn't outrageous.  By nature, Mab should be more powerful than Maeve in that aspect.

Again, the theory breaks down at why do it.  There was clearly a major, reality-level need for Merlin to create the DR prison.  If it's as difficult as Duck suspects, then it would require a reality-level need for Harry to go back.  And I can't think of one.

But if it doesn't take as much power to create a single bridge, and there were a really-really-important-reason for him to go back, then Mab and others might work together to get it done.  I still don't know why, though.
Title: Re: Proof that Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago?? (CD Spoilers)
Post by: wizard nelson on February 12, 2013, 04:03:24 PM
Quote
The whole point of the loop/bridge time-travel concept proposed here is that there wouldn't be a time where it didn't happen.
except in a parallel? honestly is it so out there? creating a loop in 1 time line would invariably create parallels in which it did NOT happen or happened without the time travel. but the loop would close in on itself creating the one self consistent timeline. do other people not see this?
Quote
From Uriel's perspective, time is not linear.  Stand back far enough, and it's apparently wibbly wobbly.  By creating a permanent temporal bridge, those 5 times are linked to occur at the same time the first time.  There was no time he didn't make the prison.
THAT IS A LOOP. he used time travel to create DR obviously? if there is no time he didn't create it then he always traveled through time and created it, novikov imbodied dude :o
Title: Re: Proof that Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago?? (CD Spoilers)
Post by: the neurovore of Zur-En-Aargh on February 12, 2013, 04:48:40 PM
BUT, saying it does, the issue always seems to be, what happened first?  If Harry had to travel back to fix LC, then who fixed it the first time?  Why didn't they fix it the second time?  Did Harry do something that screwed up the other person's actions, and he had to fulfill it himself?  Or did it not get fixed the first time?  Thus, Harry would have died, so how did the reality where Harry didn't die come about?

Arguments of this sort always seem to me to be somewhat palming a card, in that they appear to be assuming that at the end of whatever it is you need to have a coherent and consistent causality with no paradoxes.  I see absolutely no reason to assume this needs to be the case - it's like assuming the Earth is flat and the sun goes around it because that's what things look like by the evidence of one's eyes, but ruling out the possibility that more complicated and abstract things may work differently from what makes immediate common sense to a human.

What Harry saw of Merlin making the prison was dumbed way the heck down for human comprehension.  Your  temporal bridge explanation of it makes sense but I do not think we can assume that we have the right explanation.

I am entirely on for closed causal loop explanations of the form "Harry has to go back because he finds out he did go back", myself.
Title: Re: Proof that Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago?? (CD Spoilers)
Post by: wizard nelson on February 12, 2013, 04:54:24 PM
reminds me of the terminators time loop. "who fathered john conner before john sent kyle into the past to father him?" the answer is.....

there is no answer :P
or atl no answer in this reality. you'd have to jump ship to the parallel reality in which it didn't happen and thats more complicated by far then any timetravel mechanism.
Quote
I am entirely on for closed causal loop explanations of the form "Harry has to go back because he finds out he did go back", myself.
although its virtually against my nature, i feel i must give you a virtual hug.... *hugs*
Title: Re: Proof that Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago?? (CD Spoilers)
Post by: Griffyn612 on February 12, 2013, 04:54:52 PM
except in a parallel? honestly is it so out there? creating a loop in 1 time line would invariably create parallels in which it did NOT happen or happened without the time travel. but the loop would close in on itself creating the one self consistent timeline. do other people not see this? THAT IS A LOOP. he used time travel to create DR obviously? if there is no time he didn't create it then he always traveled through time and created it, novikov imbodied dude :o

With the string example, it creates a visual loop, but the two sections of string still exist.  They don't merge and become one, causing an infinite loop.  They touch, but they don't merge. 

The point of the bridge theory is that there isn't a time when the times weren't merged.  They were always merged, because the fabric of time-space was manipulated so that those times occur together at that place. 

The bridge links the two times on a higher level than we perceive.  "Time Travel" usually involved a portal/gate/doorway that sends someone backwards or forwards.  In the instance of a temporal bridge, as I'm proposing, there is no backwards or forwards in time; that point in time is the same point in time occurring at 5 times.  Everything around it still moves at its normal pace.  Millenia before Merlin was born, Merlin appeared on DR to create the prison.  If someone else walked onto the island before the bridge was created, and watched Merlin as he cast the wards, then that person could have walked off the island/bridge, and found themselves in one of 5 different times.  Assuming that the temporal bridge holding that place and time together didn't rip them apart in the process.

It's not creating a paradox, because reality was warped on a fundamental level to allow the existence of that place in 5 times simultaneously.  But only in that one place.  The rest of space and time moved along normally.
Title: Re: Proof that Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago?? (CD Spoilers)
Post by: wizard nelson on February 12, 2013, 05:06:58 PM
Quote
The point of the bridge theory is that there isn't a time when the times weren't merged.  They were always merged, because the fabric of time-space was manipulated so that those times occur together at that place.
loop...
Quote
"Time Travel" usually involved a portal/gate/doorway that sends someone backwards or forwards.
i think here is your problem. your limiting time travel to this and telling us this merging of time is different. a causual loop is merging a whole timestream, same idea applied to the whole thread. basically smoothing out the wrinkle that is your question. "who did it if harry hasn't done it yet."

damn now i wanna read the wrinkle in time again....
Title: Re: Proof that Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago?? (CD Spoilers)
Post by: wizard nelson on February 12, 2013, 05:14:22 PM
oh... but if your saying merlin manipulated time and space to create a pocket dimension that exists in 5 times and none, then i agree with that. i wag merlin exists on DR outside of space and time(*shrug* similar has been done by other merlin characters) and this is how he kinda,sorta, didn't die but isn't around anymore.
edit- in science 5 dimensions are used to create the theoretical 'bottomless bags' coincidence merlin created DR in 5 dimensions?
Title: Re: Proof that Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago?? (CD Spoilers)
Post by: Griffyn612 on February 12, 2013, 05:32:31 PM
oh... but if your saying merlin manipulated time and space to create a pocket dimension that exists in 5 times and none, then i agree with that. i wag merlin exists on DR outside of space and time(*shrug* similar has been done by other merlin characters) and this is how he kinda,sorta, didn't die but isn't around anymore.

That's kind of what I'm saying.  The loop image above isn't showing where time is overlapping to coexist everywhere; it's like the two points on the string (or in Merlin's case, 5 points) are parallel to each other.  Then, Merlin & Co. create a 'pocket dimension', as you call it, a physical area confined to DR that 'bridges' the 5 times into 1 at the single point (DR).  That's the needle piercing through the strands at one point, creating a single link through them all, but allowing each strand to still exist individually. 

He's not changing time, he's doing something that was always done because someone outside linear time set it up. 
Title: Re: Proof that Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago?? (CD Spoilers)
Post by: wizard nelson on February 12, 2013, 05:39:52 PM
ummm you ever read the merlin conspiracy? you might like it. your island sounds like romanov's island. different points in time and space all connected by the nexus that is his actual portion of land existing in its own timeframe.
Title: Re: Proof that Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago?? (CD Spoilers)
Post by: Griffyn612 on February 12, 2013, 05:42:23 PM
ummm you ever read the merlin conspiracy? you might like it. your island sounds like romanov's island. different points in time and space all connected by the nexus that is his actual portion of land existing in its own timeframe.

Nope, never read it.  I'll give it a try.  I don't have anything else to read right now, so I'm spending too many hours on this site talking about Dresden.   :D
Title: Re: Proof that Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago?? (CD Spoilers)
Post by: robertltux on February 12, 2013, 05:43:16 PM
these timey whimy whiblley wobbley posts are fun.


I would like to see a DR Who/ Dresden crossover story. Would Gallefrian tech survive being close to HBCD?? Is the ZaGuard big enough to move the TARDIS??

Is The Well basically a DV "Tardis" that can't move??
Title: Re: Proof that Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago?? (CD Spoilers)
Post by: Ms Duck on February 12, 2013, 06:15:16 PM
The whole point of the loop/bridge time-travel concept proposed here is that there wouldn't be a time where it didn't happen. 

From Uriel's perspective, time is not linear.  Stand back far enough, and it's apparently wibbly wobbly.  By creating a permanent temporal bridge, those 5 times are linked to occur at the same time the first time.  There was no time he didn't make the prison.

Picture a piece of string.  It's linear, as mortals see time.  Now imagine that Merlin got help creating a loop, where two parts of the string overlap, like this:
(http://www.stringpage.com/blog/photos/weave01-20070826.jpg)

Where the string overlaps itself is two separate points of time.  Now imagine a pin getting pushed through the string, bonding the two points together.  That makes them permanently bound together.  Only instead of just one loop for two points, there are 4 loops for 5 points of time.

The reason Ms Duck has an issue with it is because messing with time like that would seem to be a very high-level trick.  She thinks that it would take a WG-level talent to do it.

But Merlin clearly did it, presumably with help.  We can either assume that TWG helped, but if so, why did TWG both involving a mortal at all?  Or we can assume that one or multiple lower-tier powers (Mab, Odin, Uriel) worked together to do it. 

We know that the Ladies working together were able to channel their attack across multiple times.  So the idea that there are time-travel capabilities among the powers isn't outrageous.  By nature, Mab should be more powerful than Maeve in that aspect.

Again, the theory breaks down at why do it.  There was clearly a major, reality-level need for Merlin to create the DR prison.  If it's as difficult as Duck suspects, then it would require a reality-level need for Harry to go back.  And I can't think of one.

But if it doesn't take as much power to create a single bridge, and there were a really-really-important-reason for him to go back, then Mab and others might work together to get it done.  I still don't know why, though.

couple of issues: you are assuming maeve and lilly created the time warp, and the weapons. I find that assumption dubious; Maeve was the bait, not the mastermind. She was standing at ground zero for crying out loud.

HHWx , who is in Mab's power level is to my mind a far more likely suspect.

second, your concept of time travel is more of the liberal rts type then the hard sci fi type; which works well for some worlds but not as well for Jim's. Conservation of energy exists; its not just the change you have to account for, its the sending the person back to make the change in the first place.

What Odin is saying the farther you send someone back, the more power it takes, and he's also saying its so dang expensive that even people like Mab don't do it- that's why she uses precog instead, where she looks into possible futures and makes changes in the now to make those futures more likely.

which is why Rashid and Mab are far more likely suspects; both can see the possible future, and both had access to the now that was required.

 ;)
Title: Re: Proof that Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago?? (CD Spoilers)
Post by: the neurovore of Zur-En-Aargh on February 12, 2013, 06:22:55 PM
although its virtually against my nature, i feel i must give you a virtual hug.... *hugs*

Thank you kindly. *hug*

(I also like Harry going back because he finds out he went back because it's fun ammo for the free will argument.)
Title: Re: Proof that Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago?? (CD Spoilers)
Post by: Griffyn612 on February 12, 2013, 06:54:31 PM
couple of issues: you are assuming maeve and lilly created the time warp, and the weapons. I find that assumption dubious; Maeve was the bait, not the mastermind. She was standing at ground zero for crying out loud.

HHWx , who is in Mab's power level is to my mind a far more likely suspect.

second, your concept of time travel is more of the liberal rts type then the hard sci fi type; which works well for some worlds but not as well for Jim's. Conservation of energy exists; its not just the change you have to account for, its the sending the person back to make the change in the first place.

What Odin is saying the farther you send someone back, the more power it takes, and he's also saying its so dang expensive that even people like Mab don't do it- that's why she uses precog instead, where she looks into possible futures and makes changes in the now to make those futures more likely.

which is why Rashid and Mab are far more likely suspects; both can see the possible future, and both had access to the now that was required.

 ;)

Now you're just being contrary.

First, I'm not just assuming Maeve and Lily created the time warp.  Maeve created a time-dilation field in PG, when working with Lily.  Then it occurs again in CD, when Maeve and Lily are working together to attack DR across time.  When Harry asks who could have done it, Odin Claus says that Harry has encountered this before.  Harry then replies that it's one of the Queens, or someone on their level.  All of that works together.  Or... we can assume that one of the Walkers, who haven't shown any time-dilation ability, can do it as well.  Which is a more reasonable assumption?

Second, I'll admit I'm not as up to snuff on the science fiction protocols on time-travel.  But we've seen at least 4 instances of time manipulation.  One is mostly mental (Lash in WN), two are distortions (Maeve-Lily in PG/CD), and Uriel being all anti-linear in GS.  There was no apparent cost to Uriel's stepping out of linear time in GS; at his level, the power required probably is negligible. 

So far, you haven't provided anything about Merlin's time manipulation to create the prison.  All you've said is that it isn't possible.  But since it clearly happened, it must be possible, at least in the Dresdenverse.  The Erlking himself admits in CD that time "is a massive force, all but beyond even our control."  But by Odin's definition, the high energy requirement is to CHANGE the past.  What I'm proposing isn't CHANGING the past; it's fulfilling what will be because it was always meant to be.  Someone had a plan for the prison, and Merlin was the tool (as you like to look at it).  Merlin cast the wards, but someone else was probably involved in the time aspects of the creation.

In the argument for TTH, the proposal is that Harry could travel back in time by using a time-nexus-bridge-within-a-pocket-dimension on DR.  For that argument, it already happened because the two times are the same, allowing him to go back.  Therefore there wouldn't need to be a huge expenditure to CHANGE the past.  There would merely be the expenditure to create the time-nexus-bridge-within-a-pocket-dimension to begin with.  And since it's happened before, in the Dresdenverse, it could happen again, if the NEED were great enough.
Title: Re: Proof that Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago?? (CD Spoilers)
Post by: Cenphx on February 12, 2013, 07:19:20 PM
But then why did Odin tell Harry about the temporal echoes from changing the past at all? If the echoes from Maeve and Lily at DR werent from them changing the past, then when did Odin give Harry that part of the explanation, which was both useless and wrong? I could see Odin giving Harry info he would also need for a different situation later on, but the way you've theorized time travel, none of the potential examples we have in the books are actually changing time, so no temporal echoes, and Odin's info again applies to nothing. I dont think Odin or Jim gave us the explanation of the way those echoes work not to have it apply somewhere in TDF.
Title: Re: Proof that Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago?? (CD Spoilers)
Post by: Cenphx on February 12, 2013, 07:28:38 PM
@ neurovore -- re: having a universe in which both closed time travel loops and altering the past are possible even though they appear, to our ability to understand, mutually exclusive. The way I understand what you are saying, tell me if I am wrong, is kind of how light is both a wave and a particle, which I know to be true but cannot grasp how it is both at the same time. Or thay schrodingers cat thing. Sometimes I have to accept that my mind cant make paradoxes fit together understandably and the aforementioned time travel paradox might be one. The problem is, this is a work of fiction, which in a lot of ways, has to be *more understandable* than the universe for a reader to follow the action and for the action to be believable. You could write a book where the in-unverse rules were the craziness of quantum particles, but it would be so foreign that it would hardly be storytelling, I would think.
Title: Re: Proof that Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago?? (CD Spoilers)
Post by: the neurovore of Zur-En-Aargh on February 12, 2013, 08:32:43 PM
@ neurovore -- re: having a universe in which both closed time travel loops and altering the past are possible even though they appear, to our ability to understand, mutually exclusive. The way I understand what you are saying, tell me if I am wrong, is kind of how light is both a wave and a particle, which I know to be true but cannot grasp how it is both at the same time.

Not really.  I am positing that a universe (real or fictional) could exist such that some modes of time travel, or behaviours while travelling in time, lead to a closed loop, and other modes of time travel, or behaviour while time-travelling lead to changing the past.

Quote
Or thay schrodingers cat thing. Sometimes I have to accept that my mind cant make paradoxes fit together understandably and the aforementioned time travel paradox might be one. The problem is, this is a work of fiction, which in a lot of ways, has to be *more understandable* than the universe for a reader to follow the action and for the action to be believable. You could write a book where the in-unverse rules were the craziness of quantum particles, but it would be so foreign that it would hardly be storytelling, I would think.

I am pretty sure Greg Egan has done exactly that, fwiw, in several short stories and the novel Quarantine, and while they are fairly intellectual stories they still work.  I'd also note that Homestuck appears to be successful for of the order of a million readers, with a plot that has both closed-loop time-travel and alternate-world versions happening to an extent to make a Doctor Who season finale look like a game of tic-tac-toe, so it's possible for a good storyteller to make very complex time-travel work in a popular-fiction mode (even one whose primary audience is young teens), and Jim's definitely a good storyteller in a popular-fiction mode.
Title: Re: Proof that Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago?? (CD Spoilers)
Post by: Griffyn612 on February 12, 2013, 08:44:15 PM
But then why did Odin tell Harry about the temporal echoes from changing the past at all? If the echoes from Maeve and Lily at DR werent from them changing the past, then when did Odin give Harry that part of the explanation, which was both useless and wrong? I could see Odin giving Harry info he would also need for a different situation later on, but the way you've theorized time travel, none of the potential examples we have in the books are actually changing time, so no temporal echoes, and Odin's info again applies to nothing. I dont think Odin or Jim gave us the explanation of the way those echoes work not to have it apply somewhere in TDF.

I think JB was using that opportunity to establish the idea of parallel alternate timelines in the Dresdenverse.  My guess is that someone will use time-travel to change something, or they already have, and JB is going to go the parallel-time-line route rather than the traditional time-travel route.  I don't see JB doing both a TT-back story and a TT-parallel story in the remaining 6 books before the BAT.  And since he's already shown enthusiasm for a Mirror Mirror story, the TT-back plot is probably out.

And I seriously doubt that Harry will time-travel back to PG to do anything, even if a TT-back plot were introduced.  But my point is that he could, and it would explain some things.  Pretty much all the other theories are easier, and infintely more likely.  But that doesn't mean that it couldn't happen.

Put simply, the TTH theory doesn't offer any solutions that can't be reached by other theories; it simply opens the door for another layer to the pre-existing story of PG, making it more complex.
Title: Re: Proof that Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago?? (CD Spoilers)
Post by: Ms Duck on February 12, 2013, 09:21:17 PM
I think JB was using that opportunity to establish the idea of parallel alternate timelines in the Dresdenverse.  My guess is that someone will use time-travel to change something, or they already have, and JB is going to go the parallel-time-line route rather than the traditional time-travel route.  I don't see JB doing both a TT-back story and a TT-parallel story in the remaining 6 books before the BAT.  And since he's already shown enthusiasm for a Mirror Mirror story, the TT-back plot is probably out.

And I seriously doubt that Harry will time-travel back to PG to do anything, even if a TT-back plot were introduced.  But my point is that he could, and it would explain some things.  Pretty much all the other theories are easier, and infintely more likely.  But that doesn't mean that it couldn't happen.

Put simply, the TTH theory doesn't offer any solutions that can't be reached by other theories; it simply opens the door for another layer to the pre-existing story of PG, making it more complex.

well that part at least I agree with.

as to merlin, what if he didn't travel Back in time, but forwards, which in the df, is much easier?

what if hes 10,000 years old?

the possibility of ancient civilizations has been suggested before..

Title: Re: Proof that Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago?? (CD Spoilers)
Post by: Griffyn612 on February 12, 2013, 09:47:11 PM
well that part at least I agree with.

as to merlin, what if he didn't travel Back in time, but forwards, which in the df, is much easier?

what if hes 10,000 years old?

the possibility of ancient civilizations has been suggested before..

My assumption is that Merlin Emrys is/was a mortal wizard.  Maybe he is/was ancient, and from Atlantis for all we know.  One of the few fictions I read about Merlin was the Lawhead series, where Taliesin was his father, who was born on Atlantis.  I don't know where he got that idea from.

But the issue remains that he managed to get all 5 times to occur at once.  That's still some sort of time manipulation, which seems beyond your typical mortal practitioner.

As for Merlin being ancient in the Dresdenverse, I think his involvement in the Wouncil eliminates him being anything other than a mortal, right?  So unless he's been hanging out in his own crystal cave on DR in a padded crystalline cell, it makes it hard for him to escape aging.
Title: Re: Proof that Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago?? (CD Spoilers)
Post by: Cenphx on February 12, 2013, 09:57:18 PM
Not really.  I am positing that a universe (real or fictional) could exist such that some modes of time travel, or behaviours while travelling in time, lead to a closed loop, and other modes of time travel, or behaviour while time-travelling lead to changing the past.

 
Ahh, there. This makes sense. It seems exceedingly obvious now that you’ve said it, but it wasn’t at all obvious to me before. Not all time travel has to be the same kind of time travel. We could have Tardis-y time travel, and the ribbon time folding-y thing Griffyn612 mentioned and any number of other models, some of which could lead to the closed time loops, others possibly allowing the past to be rewritten. This latter version would be the one which Odin was talking about, and the only one, for sure, that we know about which causes temporal echoes. As a matter of fact, if we incorporate Ms Duck’s point that not every being engaging in time travel will have the same skill or power level, it could be that the differences in such is what results in the ability to change time versus getting stuck in a closed loop.

So to the original question I asked—whether the lack of temporal echoes means that we know Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago—the answer, in my opinion, is no, it does not prove anything because we do not yet know enough about time travel in TDF to know that temporal echoes occur in every situation or what type of time travel would be involved in that particular journey.


I think JB was using that opportunity to establish the idea of parallel alternate timelines in the Dresdenverse.  My guess is that someone will use time-travel to change something, or they already have, and JB is going to go the parallel-time-line route rather than the traditional time-travel route.  I don't see JB doing both a TT-back story and a TT-parallel story in the remaining 6 books before the BAT.  And since he's already shown enthusiasm for a Mirror Mirror story, the TT-back plot is probably out.

And I seriously doubt that Harry will time-travel back to PG to do anything, even if a TT-back plot were introduced.  But my point is that he could, and it would explain some things.  Pretty much all the other theories are easier, and infintely more likely.  But that doesn't mean that it couldn't happen.

Put simply, the TTH theory doesn't offer any solutions that can't be reached by other theories; it simply opens the door for another layer to the pre-existing story of PG, making it more complex.

Agreed. :) That’s nice to be able to say.




Title: Re: Proof that Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago?? (CD Spoilers)
Post by: Ms Duck on February 12, 2013, 10:57:50 PM
My assumption is that Merlin Emrys is/was a mortal wizard.  Maybe he is/was ancient, and from Atlantis for all we know.  One of the few fictions I read about Merlin was the Lawhead series, where Taliesin was his father, who was born on Atlantis.  I don't know where he got that idea from.

But the issue remains that he managed to get all 5 times to occur at once.  That's still some sort of time manipulation, which seems beyond your typical mortal practitioner.

As for Merlin being ancient in the Dresdenverse, I think his involvement in the Wouncil eliminates him being anything other than a mortal, right?  So unless he's been hanging out in his own crystal cave on DR in a padded crystalline cell, it makes it hard for him to escape aging.

merlin in mythology is a changeling, tho whether half demon or half sidhe varies. he's also curse to live backwards in time in several version.s
Title: Re: Proof that Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago?? (CD Spoilers)
Post by: Silkki on February 12, 2013, 11:09:12 PM
I think most obvious thing to suggest that it's possible to travel trough time even as a mortal is in the laws of magic. If it's impossible unless you are a god, and a strong one at that, the law is meaningless. Something I don't think it is.

Didn't read trough the whole thread so sorry if this was addressed earlier, but the CD energy response was Demonreach chargin in order to use Banefire. It was simply doing it ahead of time cause it was able to sense the incoming attack that would occur in the future.

Title: Re: Proof that Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago?? (CD Spoilers)
Post by: Ms Duck on February 12, 2013, 11:11:11 PM
I think most obvious thing to suggest that it's possible to travel trough time even as a mortal is in the laws of magic. If it's impossible unless you are a god, and a strong one at that, the law is meaningless. Something I don't think it is.

Didn't read trough the whole thread so sorry if this was addressed earlier, but the CD energy response was Demonreach chargin in order to use Banefire. It was simply doing it ahead of time cause it was able to sense the incoming attack that would occur in the future.

the law prohibits swimming thru time, which includes travel to alternate nows, seeing the future, and trying to visit the future to alter the present as well as going back wards

the laws tend to be fairly specific , for example it does not say ' do not kill' it says ' do not kill mortals with magic'
Title: Re: Proof that Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago?? (CD Spoilers)
Post by: the neurovore of Zur-En-Aargh on February 12, 2013, 11:41:51 PM
My assumption is that Merlin Emrys is/was a mortal wizard.  Maybe he is/was ancient, and from Atlantis for all we know.  One of the few fictions I read about Merlin was the Lawhead series, where Taliesin was his father, who was born on Atlantis.  I don't know where he got that idea from.

Considering that's the series where the ancient Celts eat potatoes for breakfast, he probably made it up out of whole cloth.  (Potatoes; native to the Americas. Not known in Europe until over a millennium later.)

Quote
As for Merlin being ancient in the Dresdenverse, I think his involvement in the Wouncil eliminates him being anything other than a mortal, right? 

Depends on whether he followed the rules he was setting for everyone else.
Title: Re: Proof that Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago?? (CD Spoilers)
Post by: the neurovore of Zur-En-Aargh on February 12, 2013, 11:44:15 PM
the law prohibits swimming thru time, which includes travel to alternate nows, seeing the future, and trying to visit the future to alter the present as well as going back wards

the laws tend to be fairly specific , for example it does not say ' do not kill' it says ' do not kill mortals with magic'

Eb qioutes the relevant law in BR as "swim against the currents of time".  I'm not sure that rules out all the options you mention.
Title: Re: Proof that Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago?? (CD Spoilers)
Post by: Hollorr on February 13, 2013, 02:33:58 AM
Ahh, there. This makes sense. It seems exceedingly obvious now that you’ve said it, but it wasn’t at all obvious to me before. Not all time travel has to be the same kind of time travel. We could have Tardis-y time travel, and the ribbon time folding-y thing Griffyn612 mentioned and any number of other models, some of which could lead to the closed time loops, others possibly allowing the past to be rewritten. This latter version would be the one which Odin was talking about, and the only one, for sure, that we know about which causes temporal echoes. As a matter of fact, if we incorporate Ms Duck’s point that not every being engaging in time travel will have the same skill or power level, it could be that the differences in such is what results in the ability to change time versus getting stuck in a closed loop.

So to the original question I asked—whether the lack of temporal echoes means that we know Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago—the answer, in my opinion, is no, it does not prove anything because we do not yet know enough about time travel in TDF to know that temporal echoes occur in every situation or what type of time travel would be involved in that particular journey.
Hmm I think it got the word I wanted to be bold in the quote but just in case " lack of temporal echoes means that we know Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago—the answer"
From what I understand from CD that you had to be physically close to the area where the Echoes are coming to feel them or thats what I got from both Molly and Harry saying as soon they got to DR island and felt something wrong....whos to say that FH didn't bridge a gap back to the Past Harry timelime far away enough to hide the Echoes your talking about.
Oh yeah I think the timetravel is possible but it might require like 13 mages that From SF talks about to do a ritual or some major gods like the greaks since we haven't really seen Zeus Pantheon.
oh the bob the skull talking about stealing a car to explain to harry about what the gate keeper does and someone said that could be a JB clues about whats gonna happen...FH steals car and trys to run over PH to give him enough time to fix LC..anyway Bob the skull was from another poster.
Title: Re: Proof that Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago?? (CD Spoilers)
Post by: wizard nelson on February 13, 2013, 02:45:59 AM
Quote
Oh yeah I think the timetravel is possible but it might require like 13 mages that From SF talks about to do a ritual
13 is just the maximum number of practitioners that can cooperate on a ritual nothing to do with time travel itself. usually its weak practitioners that do this though 13 weaklings doth not time travel enable. its almost a given a godling must help. odin even says so.
Title: Re: Proof that Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago?? (CD Spoilers)
Post by: Cenphx on February 13, 2013, 03:14:32 AM
Regarding the temporal echoes, Hollorr, you makea good point. Molly did say she felt them when she was visiting DR. So in the Little Chicago example, if the sort of time travel were used that caused the echoes, it might only be close to the site. Of course that would be Harry's lab in the six years or more before PG, so maybe Harry wouldve noticed them? But we dont know precisely what they would look like either...
Title: Re: Proof that Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago?? (CD Spoilers)
Post by: Griffyn612 on February 13, 2013, 03:57:36 AM
Regarding the temporal echoes, Hollorr, you makea good point. Molly did say she felt them when she was visiting DR. So in the Little Chicago example, if the sort of time travel were used that caused the echoes, it might only be close to the site. Of course that would be Harry's lab in the six years or more before PG, so maybe Harry wouldve noticed them? But we dont know precisely what they would look like either...

Remember, the things she felt on DR were a symptom of the attack, not the time-dilation.  It was the energy buildup, which she described as a steam in a boiler.  That same thing is said by Harry and Bob to be the flares of the temporal energy attack rippling back.  It's a combination of both the time distortion and the attack.  And it was only felt on DR, where both were taking place.

Even if there were echoes of some sort, if the bridge/pocket were formed on DR, that's where the echoes would be felt.  Since Harry never set foot on DR until years after PG, I don't think anyone would know.  But it would be interesting if there were some sort of time-dilation resonance between the two points (PG and the time a bridge were created).  That resonance may have a strange side affect, like maybe letting Harry get a minor feel for Intellectus on the island prior to actually bonding with it?  We can accept Anya-My-Mind-Has-Been-Screwed-With-Luccio's explanation of "it's your precognitive sight, stupid", or maybe it's a side-affect of a bridge between two times, one where Harry is bonded to the island, and one where he isn't?
Title: Re: Proof that Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago?? (CD Spoilers)
Post by: the neurovore of Zur-En-Aargh on February 13, 2013, 04:52:53 AM
oh the bob the skull talking about stealing a car to explain to harry about what the gate keeper does and someone said that could be a JB clues about whats gonna happen...FH steals car and trys to run over PH to give him enough time to fix LC..anyway Bob the skull was from another poster.

nah, Future Harry's new car from CD seems big enough to run PG-Harry in the Beetle off the road.
Title: Re: Proof that Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago?? (CD Spoilers)
Post by: matorade on February 13, 2013, 05:08:30 AM
Here I have a problem when it comes to TTH fixing Little Chicago.  Bob clearly said Harry would have been toasted if he used it.  Since Bob missed the screw-up in the first place, then the question is how the hell can TTH come back when he was already blown away once he finally use Little Chicago in some point after PG events without any distraction.  I mean supposed Harry, in case, in some future spotted this screw-up before using it and then time-travelled to PG in later future and fixed LC beforehand, then won't it be like he has just erased his own timeline literally and that he can't come back to the future to pick up where he left behind?  Leaving him running around while an alternate Harry exists in the current Dresden universe, I guess that would be my exact thought if TTH theory did happened.

Ugh, I hate time paradox and slip theories...


EDIT: Sorry, had a long day and should have slapped my sleepyhead
Title: Re: Proof that Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago?? (CD Spoilers)
Post by: wizard nelson on February 13, 2013, 05:16:27 AM
thats why its a time loop ;) to again reference terminator how did john send his dad back in time to father him if he hadn't done it yet? in that one particular time stream it ALWAYS happened and couldn't have happened any other way. this does not discount the idea of parallel divergence or them becoming paradox but this is what a novikov time loop is, a self contained time stream that exists because time travel was used to create it. i know, it doesn't answer your question directly but thats because until someone actually uses time  travel its all theory, there is no answer.
Title: Re: Proof that Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago?? (CD Spoilers)
Post by: Ms Duck on February 13, 2013, 05:22:42 AM
I don't believe stable time loops are even possible in the df; from everything that's ever been said, the future at any point is only possible; not definite.

having a time loop would thus violate the magical rule of free will and the law of conservation of magic.

(when future harry goes back to fix LC, he voids any decisions any person could make until the point he leaves.. for example, Molly no longer had the choice of going to the council or not at the end of PG. its is now fated she will... Uriel will be ticked )
Title: Re: Proof that Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago?? (CD Spoilers)
Post by: wizard nelson on February 13, 2013, 05:25:38 AM
oh god, don't complicate things by mentioning free will and time travel in the same post. my head might pop if i have to wrap it around that one. :'(
thats why he doesn't go around meddling with everything but works from behind the scenes. if he went back and messed with free will it becomes a divergent parallel instead of a loop. you have to effect a choice to screw with free will. time travel isn't possible at all then except we know it is or the WC wouldn't feel the need for a law on it. going back and effecting things at all effects free will. whose to say mortals aren't free to do that?( I think that was my point in the other thread that time travel and changing things requires a mortals touch)
Title: Re: Proof that Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago?? (CD Spoilers)
Post by: Griffyn612 on February 13, 2013, 02:20:51 PM
thats why its a time loop ;) to again reference terminator how did john send his dad back in time to father him if he hadn't done it yet? in that one particular time stream it ALWAYS happened and couldn't have happened any other way. this does not discount the idea of parallel divergence or them becoming paradox but this is what a novikov time loop is, a self contained time stream that exists because time travel was used to create it. i know, it doesn't answer your question directly but thats because until someone actually uses time  travel its all theory, there is no answer.

I guess either people aren't reading the thread to see that we've already discussed the paradox/time loop issue, or they're not understanding that using the Merlin Emrys Temporal Bridge Using a Pocket Dimension (METBUPD) means that there wouldn't have been a first time that Harry didn't fix it.

Am I really the only one that's seeing that possibility?  I know Duck doesn't like it because of the power requirements.  I don't want to rehash those points.  I'm just befuddled by people not getting what I'm saying.  This is when I need someone to translate what's in my head to the thread.  Someone summon aShorty.
Title: Re: Proof that Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago?? (CD Spoilers)
Post by: Ms Duck on February 13, 2013, 02:29:30 PM
I guess either people aren't reading the thread to see that we've already discussed the paradox/time loop issue, or they're not understanding that using the Merlin Emrys Temporal Bridge Using a Pocket Dimension (METBUPD) means that there wouldn't have been a first time that Harry didn't fix it.

Am I really the only one that's seeing that possibility?  I know Duck doesn't like it because of the power requirements.  I don't want to rehash those points.  I'm just befuddled by people not getting what I'm saying.  This is when I need someone to translate what's in my head to the thread.  Someone summon aShorty.

I understand your logic, but its circular. Harry doesn't have to fix it because harry fixed it but doesn't have to fix it because he fixed it...

A- it violates free will
B- circular reasoning is inherently problematic
C- stable time loops can only exist in a deterministic universe

let's say I find a time machine. its just there. I walk in, learn how to use it, and  go back in time to the day before, leaving it there for me to find

does that mean the time machine was created by the time loop, and thus has no beginning and no end? Nobody made it, this just appeared?

problems-

conservation: of it was possible to do this, there would be no conservation of energy, which according to mother winter does exist

free will: what if the next me in the cycle decides to keep it and do something else?

random chance: what if the machine break mid loop?

temporal echo's: in the df, messing with time creates artifacts.  Just how screwed up did I just make the universe?



Title: Re: Proof that Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago?? (CD Spoilers)
Post by: the neurovore of Zur-En-Aargh on February 13, 2013, 04:23:13 PM
I understand your logic, but its circular. Harry doesn't have to fix it because harry fixed it but doesn't have to fix it because he fixed it...

I'm not seeing why this is a problem.

Quote
A- it violates free will

No more than any other case of Harry doing something because it's the sort of thing he does and can be relied on to do.

Quote
B- circular reasoning is inherently problematic

How so ? I can see taking closed-causal loops as problematic on axiomatic grounds, but if you are not a priori supposing it, i am not seeing an actual argument here.

Quote
C- stable time loops can only exist in a deterministic universe

Not seeing your argument for this either. An individual stable time loop in a broader free-willed universe seems no more problematic to me than saying that, while in a free-willed universe it's possible for me to catch a pen falling off my desk, there can exist in that free-willed universe some specific instances where the pen falls off my desk and deterministically hits the floor.

Quote
let's say I find a time machine. its just there. I walk in, learn how to use it, and  go back in time to the day before, leaving it there for me to find
does that mean the time machine was created by the time loop, and thus has no beginning and no end? Nobody made it, this just appeared?

Yep.

Quote
conservation: of it was possible to do this, there would be no conservation of energy, which according to mother winter does exist

Not an issue.  You're not adding anything to the universe long-term.  Your time machine exists for one day in a closed loop.

Quote
free will: what if the next me in the cycle decides to keep it and do something else?

What "next you" ?  There's only ever one you who makes one decision once.

Quote
random chance: what if the machine break mid loop?

If it's there for you to find, it already hasn't broken.  That's like having problems with the bus that took you to work this morning being there to take you to work this morning because what if it had broken down yesterday ?

Quote
temporal echo's: in the df, messing with time creates artifacts.  Just how screwed up did I just make the universe?

Sfaict from CD, the echoes are of finite duration and extent and fade with distance from the event.  So a one-day loop where you're not doing much else does not seem to have much impact on anything.
Title: Re: Proof that Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago?? (CD Spoilers)
Post by: beetnemesis on February 13, 2013, 04:25:45 PM
Ms Duck, those are valid arguments... that don't really have a place in this thread. The reason is, ALL time travel plots tend to have those problems.

I feel like we're getting bogged down in trying to guess what the physics of time travel in the Dresdenverse is.  Here's what we know:

1- There will very likely be a book that, in some way, deals with time travel (I believe the WoJ says something like, "Well, it's a rule, so you know Dresden is going to HAVE to break it in some way, right ? *wink*")

2- There are a number of obstacles/inconsistencies to overcome in order to fix Little Chicago.  To wit:

a) Harry's threshold
b) Not be noticed/or mentioned later by Bob the Skull
c) Not be noticed/mentioned by Thomas
d) knowledge and ability to fix LC

Now, I think b) is actually the key to this. Why? Because Bob is loyal only to Harry. Bob will tell Harry anything EXCEPT if he can be convinced that that knowledge will definitely bring him harm to Harry (See Thomas's short story, "Backup," where Thomas tells Bob about the Oblivion War and swears him to secrecy).

Has it ever been confirmed that Bob can see through a veil? It seems like he would be able to- he can "see" magic.

My point is that, it would be extremely difficult and unlikely for a mortal wizard to fix Little Chicago without being noticed by Bob. One, because of the threshold- maintaining a veil while working on LC seems... foolhardy.  Two, because no one, including Mab, knows Harry owns Bob. If someone, somehow, snuck into Harry's basement, they would feel no need to veil themselves (and again, it seems likely Bob could pierce a veil in any case).

So. With all that said, Time-Traveling Harry seems to be the most likely candidate.  It's pointless to get bogged down in stuff like "Is Harry powerful or skilled enough to do that?" because it doesn't matter- there are any number of plot devices Butcher could trot out to lend aid to Harry in those departments.  Uriel, Mab, the Gatekeeper, Odin, and more.

However, there isn't much Butcher can do about the facts I listed above.  Any solution will have to have some explanation for them.

So, logically, that leaves a bunch of superpowers (Mab, Odin, Etc)... or a time-traveling Harry.  Of said superpowers, it'd pretty much only make sense for Mab at that point in the story.

So, as it always seems these days, we're left with Mab or Time-Travelling Harry. 

(I'm assuming here that if anyone other than TTH did it, it would NOT be through time-travelling. Mostly because that would be kind of needlessly convoluted.  Imagine reading the last book in the series, and suddenly Mab says, "OK, before we go fight Outsiders, I'm just going to go back in time without you and fix Little Chicago." Not gonna happen. If time-travelling to fix LC happens, Harry will be involved.)

When confronted with the choice between Mab or TTH, I side with TTH... mostly because it would make for a more interesting story.  Would it really be that interesting or shocking if, in a few books, Mab says "Fool wizard, of course it was I who repaired your focal device. I deemed it... neccessary."  No. We the readers would just go, "Oh, I can kinda see how that makes sense," and then we'd continue on with the book.

However, if Harry was on some kind of epic time-travelling quest that spiraled through his history, and he was in the PG-era and had to find someone RIGHT NOW... it would be much cooler if he opened his door, talked his way past Thomas, went downstairs, fooled Bob (or, more likely, talked to him and then swore him to silence), repaired LC (which he could do since he already knew what was wrong), used it, and oh, by the way, took one of his reference books and put an old "Calvin and Hobbes" anthology in the gap where it would not be discovered for another year!



tl;dr Only Mab or TTH could have done it, and TTH would make for a much cooler story.
Title: Re: Proof that Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago?? (CD Spoilers)
Post by: the neurovore of Zur-En-Aargh on February 13, 2013, 04:52:43 PM
a) Harry's threshold
b) Not be noticed/or mentioned later by Bob the Skull
c) Not be noticed/mentioned by Thomas
d) knowledge and ability to fix LC

Now, I think b) is actually the key to this. Why? Because Bob is loyal only to Harry. Bob will tell Harry anything EXCEPT if he can be convinced that that knowledge will definitely bring him harm to Harry

The problem with this argument is that quite a lot of the time when Harry goes into the basement Bob is dormant and Harry has to actively wake him.  (Hence the "lazybones" and "sleepyhead" snark in the earlier books.)  So Bob being awake enough to be a wtchdog is not guaranteed.

Quote
Two, because no one, including Mab, knows Harry owns Bob.

Harry and Bob assume this because nobody's come for Bob or tried to kill him. Nothing that I can see rules out Mab (for example) knowing perfectly well that Harry has Bob but thinking that Bob is an asset worth Harry having.

Thomas has a key to the wards.  So does Murphy.  Anyone who can either convince or compel Thomas or Murphy to let them in can get at LC.
Title: Re: Proof that Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago?? (CD Spoilers)
Post by: Cenphx on February 13, 2013, 05:55:33 PM
@Griffyn--son of a (expletive expletive expletive). You're right. About 2 seconds after I got the reasoning of your argument about the energy at DR being an interaction with its wards I forgot it when replying to Hollorr. Since I do not currently have dementia, my only excuse is that the temporal echoes thing from an altered timeline makes so much intuitive sense to me it creeps back in when it shouldnt. My bad.
Title: Re: Proof that Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago?? (CD Spoilers)
Post by: Cenphx on February 13, 2013, 06:02:29 PM
@ beetnemesis -- re: the problem Bob presents for whomever fixed LC. Wyltok laid out a pretty good argument in another thread that Rashid got around Bob with foresight because he knew Harry would take him out of the apt.       Re: getting bogged down in classic time travel logic problems. I agree that usually this would be fruitless. But Jim has started giving us working examples of time travel-esque moments (merlin building DR, tme dilations by Maeve) and some rules (from Odin). I was hoping we might be able to apply some of what we now know about TDF version of time travel to our theories which rely on time travel, but it may be premature. We may not have enough of the picture yet
Title: Re: Proof that Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago?? (CD Spoilers)
Post by: Ms Duck on February 13, 2013, 06:17:31 PM
all these were solved in either CD or GS:

a) Harry's threshold

-- gets outright lampshaded by cat sith
b) Not be noticed/or mentioned later by Bob the Skull
-- also lampshaded in cold days. Mab always knew bob was there; Harry notes this in CD
c) Not be noticed/mentioned by Thomas
-- she can veil. walk thru walls. turn into air. not seeing the problem ..
-- also lampshaded in GS and CD. Mab went into his apartments, multiple times, as part of doing Lea's Job. neither Harry no Thomas ever noticed
-- note her remaking his apartment in perfect detail in CD
-- also the Calvin and Hobbes book
d) knowledge and ability to fix LC
-- It's Mab?? That's like saying Godzilla doesn't have the knowledge and ability to step on a Yugo.  ;)


@Neuro- My point is that in a universe where free will does exist, every time you travel back in time it resets the clock- and now people have the options to make all new decisions. In a non deterministic universe, all new random events can occur.

I don't think a stable time loop is possible in the Dresden verse. which is ironic, as I suggested it years before anyone else here did, that I know of. But given the things Odin and Uriel have said, I now think I was very very wrong.

 
Title: Re: Proof that Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago?? (CD Spoilers)
Post by: Griffyn612 on February 13, 2013, 06:40:26 PM
@Griffyn--son of a (expletive expletive expletive). You're right. About 2 seconds after I got the reasoning of your argument about the energy at DR being an interaction with its wards I forgot it when replying to Hollorr. Since I do not currently have dementia, my only excuse is that the temporal echoes thing from an altered timeline makes so much intuitive sense to me it creeps back in when it shouldnt. My bad.
Honestly, my comment was more towards of motorade, who I think read the OP and then replied with stuff we'd already covered.  It made my head swim, since we're talking about similar stuff on two threads, and now we're repeating the same stuff within threads. 

I understand your logic, but its circular. Harry doesn't have to fix it because harry fixed it but doesn't have to fix it because he fixed it...

Um...  in reply, mostly what Neuro said.

I see your issue with free will.  You're saying that if Merlin created Demonreach using a temporal bridge that spanned 5 times, the first of which may have occurred prior to his birth, and by reasoning the temporal bridge must occur because it already has occurred, it's taking away Merlin's free will to chose whether or not to do it when he sets out to do it.

But it's fairly easy for free will to be subverted in the Dresdenverse.  All it would take would be a little honesty.

Quote
Odin:  Hey, Merl.
Merlin:  I told you, don't call me that.
Odin:  Okay Lin.
Merlin:  <sigh>  What?
Odin:  You have to create a prison.
Merlin:  I have to?
Odin:  Yup.
Merlin:  I don't have to do anything, you cooky Norse cyclops.
Odin:  Okay.
Merlin:  ... okay?
Odin:  Yup.  Okay.
Merlin:  ... that's it?
Odin:  Exactly.
Merlin:  ... what?
Odin:  If you don't want to do it, then that's it.  That the End of it.
Merlin:  End of what?
Odin:  The end of Everything. You. Me. Earth. Time. Reality.
Merlin:  Um... what?
Odin:  Yeah, we needed that prison to be created millennia ago by you, so that bad guys could be imprisoned, so that reality could continue to exist.
Merlin:  Oh.
Odin:  But, since you won't, then you wouldn't have, so you haven't, so I guess everything's over.
Merlin:  <looks around>  ... But we're still here.
Odin:  <looks around>  Huh... I guess you're right.
Merlin:  So what does that mean?
Odin:  It means you're going to make the damn prison, Merl.
Merlin:  <sigh>  This is why I hate my life sometimes.
Odin:  Great.  How do you feel about crystals?
Title: Re: Proof that Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago?? (CD Spoilers)
Post by: Cenphx on February 13, 2013, 07:15:45 PM
Thinking about this some more, I dont think what Griffyn proposes even creates a close time loop or the paradox it causes. If Now Harry does the time folding thing, he joins current time with a specifc moment in PG. Then it becomes one moment, neither past or future. The Harry of that momeng fixes LC. Its not that Harry always fixes LC so therefore he must, but the Harry of that joined moment fixes it. It just so happens that the moment is made up of two ribbons of time. But no time is altered, it is just pulled together. The lcosed time loop paradox happens only if you are considering time as one long unfolded ribbon where Harry moves into the past to fix LC there rather than pulling time to him in the now and fixing it here.  Im not sure if this makes matters any more clear to anyone else, but its definitely more clear to me. Assuming thats what Griffyn meant.
Title: Re: Proof that Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago?? (CD Spoilers)
Post by: the neurovore of Zur-En-Aargh on February 13, 2013, 07:23:56 PM
@Griffyn--son of a (expletive expletive expletive). You're right. About 2 seconds after I got the reasoning of your argument about the energy at DR being an interaction with its wards I forgot it when replying to Hollorr. Since I do not currently have dementia, my only excuse is that the temporal echoes thing from an altered timeline makes so much intuitive sense to me it creeps back in when it shouldnt. My bad.

Are different versions of you posting from different timelines in the same thread ?
Title: Re: Proof that Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago?? (CD Spoilers)
Post by: the neurovore of Zur-En-Aargh on February 13, 2013, 07:28:15 PM
@Neuro- My point is that in a universe where free will does exist, every time you travel back in time it resets the clock- and now people have the options to make all new decisions.

I'm still not seeing why it resets the clock except for the you who has travelled into the past and anyone you directly affect.  That people can make free choices in their present doesn't mean that once that choice has been made it is subsequently fluid, at least by my reading of Odin's comment about temporal inertia.  (Which in a universe with time-travel implies that the broad strokes of the future are not very mutable, save by focused and significant choice, but that's pretty much what Uriel's been implying when talking about most people not exercising free will very often.)
Title: Re: Proof that Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago?? (CD Spoilers)
Post by: Cenphx on February 13, 2013, 07:35:07 PM
@ neurovore - wow. That explanation is waaaaay cooler than I forgot. Using 'Past Cenphx was intruding on the current timeline' will probably only work for me in time travel thread, though.
Title: Re: Proof that Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago?? (CD Spoilers)
Post by: Ms Duck on February 13, 2013, 08:26:32 PM
I'm still not seeing why it resets the clock except for the you who has travelled into the past and anyone you directly affect.  That people can make free choices in their present doesn't mean that once that choice has been made it is subsequently fluid, at least by my reading of Odin's comment about temporal inertia.  (Which in a universe with time-travel implies that the broad strokes of the future are not very mutable, save by focused and significant choice, but that's pretty much what Uriel's been implying when talking about most people not exercising free will very often.)

because it removes the choice of the people in the then now, for lack of a better term. when you get down to it, with enough time travel free will would become asymptotic to zero.

the fact that in the DF zillions of alternate universes exist implies to me that time is not static or deterministic, but fluid. I think that by going back, you create entire logic trees of alternate realities..

If any TTH did change LC, its not ours. its the one from an alternate future that may have been.

Griff- merlin is a whole different kettle of fish. I'm not even convinced that it involved time travel at all, frankly. If you have a near immortal  who calculates he has to cast a spell in six different times to make it work, there's no reason he cant just set his calendar and do it.
Title: Re: Proof that Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago?? (CD Spoilers)
Post by: Cenphx on February 13, 2013, 08:49:38 PM
Right, merlin might live long enough to cast the spell 5 or 6 times, but isnt the problem tha Merlin did it 5 times *simulatenously*? So he couldnt have done it at 5 different points in his timeline.  (im not even gonna try to touch the free will in a time travel world issue-but im reading along)
Title: Re: Proof that Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago?? (CD Spoilers)
Post by: Ms Duck on February 13, 2013, 09:22:34 PM
Right, merlin might live long enough to cast the spell 5 or 6 times, but isnt the problem tha Merlin did it 5 times *simulatenously*? So he couldnt have done it at 5 different points in his timeline.  (im not even gonna try to touch the free will in a time travel world issue-but im reading along)

if he did that he has skills at time travel are above anything Mab has done in the books. were getting back into the 'TTH is a god' theory land there.
Title: Re: Proof that Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago?? (CD Spoilers)
Post by: Cenphx on February 13, 2013, 09:42:53 PM
Im not necessarily disagreeing with you there. I mean, you would have to be so precise as to only pull a tiny piece of the fabric of space-time that related to you and no one else. The gravitational pull of black holes only stretches space-time, right? Imagine what kind of energy it would take to *fold* space-time. Now im getting really interested in whether Jim will explain Merlin's DR spell any more than he has already.   
Title: Re: Proof that Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago?? (CD Spoilers)
Post by: the neurovore of Zur-En-Aargh on February 13, 2013, 09:43:04 PM
because it removes the choice of the people in the then now, for lack of a better term. when you get down to it, with enough time travel free will would become asymptotic to zero.

Why do they have to have choice in the then now ? Is not choice in the now now enough ?

Quote
the fact that in the DF zillions of alternate universes exist implies to me that time is not static or deterministic, but fluid. I think that by going back, you create entire logic trees of alternate realities..

I took the recent WoJ as indicating that there's a branching tree of realities arising from every point of exercise of free will anyway.

Quote
If any TTH did change LC, its not ours. its the one from an alternate future that may have been.

If that was intended as metahumour at the "this statement floats in a void with no causal connection to anything preceding" level, I salute your subtletly. If not, I'll have to ask you to unpack your reasoning a bit more.
Title: Re: Proof that Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago?? (CD Spoilers)
Post by: Ms Duck on February 13, 2013, 09:55:52 PM
Why do they have to have choice in the then now ? Is not choice in the now noew enough ?

because in a non deterministic reality, there is no 'past' or ;future' there is only the now, and 'possibilities'. When an object travels to Point B, they change that reality, even if only by their presence. At which point all the dice need to be rolled all over again.

Quote
I took the recent WoJ as indicating that there's a branching tree of realities arising from every point of exercise of free will anyway.

If that was intended as metahumour at the "this statement floats in a void with no causal connection to anything preceding" level, I salute your subtletly. If not, I'll have to ask you to unpack your reasoning a bit more.

mm ill try to unpack. I don't believe in a non deterministic universe actual time travel is possible; for example when your traveler gets into his machine at point 2013, and travels to 1961, he creates first two alternates futures:

one in which he did travel, and one in which he did not

and then two more alternate pasts...it goes exponential from there

maybe its all my marvel comics leaking thru, but at least here, its impossible to travel to your actual past or your future (because of paradox) you can only travel to your alternate past and or alternate future.

:D
Title: Re: Proof that Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago?? (CD Spoilers)
Post by: aShorty21 on February 13, 2013, 10:28:00 PM
The whole point of the loop/bridge time-travel concept proposed here is that there wouldn't be a time where it didn't happen. 

From Uriel's perspective, time is not linear.  Stand back far enough, and it's apparently wibbly wobbly.  By creating a permanent temporal bridge, those 5 times are linked to occur at the same time the first time.  There was no time he didn't make the prison.

Picture a piece of string.  It's linear, as mortals see time.  Now imagine that Merlin got help creating a loop, where two parts of the string overlap, like this:
(http://www.stringpage.com/blog/photos/weave01-20070826.jpg)

Where the string overlaps itself is two separate points of time.  Now imagine a pin getting pushed through the string, bonding the two points together.  That makes them permanently bound together.  Only instead of just one loop for two points, there are 4 loops for 5 points of time.

The reason Ms Duck has an issue with it is because messing with time like that would seem to be a very high-level trick.  She thinks that it would take a WG-level talent to do it.

But Merlin clearly did it, presumably with help.  We can either assume that TWG helped, but if so, why did TWG both involving a mortal at all?  Or we can assume that one or multiple lower-tier powers (Mab, Odin, Uriel) worked together to do it. 

We know that the Ladies working together were able to channel their attack across multiple times.  So the idea that there are time-travel capabilities among the powers isn't outrageous.  By nature, Mab should be more powerful than Maeve in that aspect.

Again, the theory breaks down at why do it.  There was clearly a major, reality-level need for Merlin to create the DR prison.  If it's as difficult as Duck suspects, then it would require a reality-level need for Harry to go back.  And I can't think of one.

But if it doesn't take as much power to create a single bridge, and there were a really-really-important-reason for him to go back, then Mab and others might work together to get it done.  I still don't know why, though.
Ok I've been away for a while and I just completed my read of this thread. I wish I was in on the conversation from the begining.

With that being said, I feel like some people are having trouble grasping Griffyn's concept of the time loop/ribbon. So here is my swag at it.

Let's back up a dimension. Think in 3 dimensions. Harry climbs up a ladder. He then goes down a spiral slide. Weeeeee! He then walks away from the slide. Think of the ground as a flat plan defined by X-Y space. Think of up as the Z direction. If you are in the sky looking down at Harry, Harry passes through the same X-Y point every loop of the slide. The only difference was in the Z (up) direction. From Harry's point of view he just went down the slide and then continued on his day. From the 2D point of view he passed through the same point.

Now to step it up a notch. To realize that Harry didn't pass through the same 3D point (only a 2D) one you have to observe the 3D path as it happens. Basically you have to be able to percieve time as linear to understand how the trip down the slide works in 3D vs 2D. So now back to the time loop theory. Same basic principle but in more dimensions. Harry is walking through space and time (4D), does something magical to pass through the same point in time he has already passed through. This is only obvious and understandable if viewed from the 5th dimension. So we can only comprehend how he does it while observing in 5D.

I find the Time Travel Loop theory plausable, but unexplainable because I don't think in 5D. How do you explain height to a 2D being?
Title: Re: Proof that Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago?? (CD Spoilers)
Post by: Cenphx on February 13, 2013, 11:06:47 PM
Ok, I get what you are saying, aShorty21, but if you are correct, then we are never going to get a better description or understanding of what Merlin did to create DR (assuming it was the folding time like a ribbon deal) and if Griffyn is correct that what Time Travel Harry did is the same time folding thing, then we also wont get any real description of how or why it works when Harry does it. At most we would get the kind of information DR gave to Harry through Bob in the Merlin movie. I have suspended my disbelief in other sci-fi settings, but it seems a little weird to do it in a first person narration. I mean, if Harry is able to understand it enough to work the spell or whatever I is, why cant we be brought along with his understanding? 
Title: Re: Proof that Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago?? (CD Spoilers)
Post by: the neurovore of Zur-En-Aargh on February 14, 2013, 12:09:26 AM
because in a non deterministic reality, there is no 'past' or ;future' there is only the now, and 'possibilities'. When an object travels to Point B, they change that reality, even if only by their presence. At which point all the dice need to be rolled all over again.

And we know this is not the case in the DV because of Odin saying that what has happened tends to continue to have happened.

Quote
mm ill try to unpack. I don't believe in a non deterministic universe actual time travel is possible; for example when your traveler gets into his machine at point 2013, and travels to 1961, he creates first two alternates futures:
one in which he did travel, and one in which he did not

Granting that much for the sake of argument...

Quote
and then two more alternate pasts...it goes exponential from there

How, again, does this differ from what we are told happens with any exercise of free will not involving time travel ?
Title: Re: Proof that Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago?? (CD Spoilers)
Post by: the neurovore of Zur-En-Aargh on February 14, 2013, 12:11:27 AM
I find the Time Travel Loop theory plausable, but unexplainable because I don't think in 5D. How do you explain height to a 2D being?

One of the hardest parts of this sort of discussion is that I can trivially think in four spatial dimensions and do five if I push it; it's very useful for complex database design.  But finding good words for how that looks inside my head has been balking me for decades.
Title: Re: Proof that Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago?? (CD Spoilers)
Post by: Elegast on February 14, 2013, 12:19:32 AM
One of the hardest parts of this sort of discussion is that I can trivially think in four spatial dimensions and do five if I push it; it's very useful for complex database design.  But finding good words for how that looks inside my head has been balking me for decades.

http://mathoverflow.net/questions/25983/intuitive-crutches-for-higher-dimensional-thinking
Title: Re: Proof that Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago?? (CD Spoilers)
Post by: Hollorr on February 14, 2013, 12:45:15 AM
@Griffyn--son of a (expletive expletive expletive). You're right. About 2 seconds after I got the reasoning of your argument about the energy at DR being an interaction with its wards I forgot it when replying to Hollorr. Since I do not currently have dementia, my only excuse is that the temporal echoes thing from an altered timeline makes so much intuitive sense to me it creeps back in when it shouldnt. My bad.
AWWW thanks Griffyn...just when someone says good point..../cry....lol
Anyway both Ms.duck and a few people are hung up about the free will taken away by time traveling...okay there was this movie my grandmother has and I can't remeber the name...I will try to find the name of it, but the whole point of the movie is about a group of archaeology people of medieval times...they go back in time to go save the main toon father from death...but anyway at the very end of the movie, they are heading back to their time in the middle of the battle and 1 stays..he makes a choice to stay behind and it doesn't affect the past or future because it's already happen.....same thing if harry choose to go back in time because of some reason. Harry in the future makes an choice to go back..key point Harry could or won't go back in time at that time he could make a choice...He could for say no and then, well die if the TTH is true but he could say yes of his own free will...I Just don't see harry going back to just save himself...maybe someone else yes but not just going to save his own hide.
IF the TTH is true there must be alot more story then that.
or as someone said a few post ago, it could be a harry from another timeline/ is trying to save himself in another time...kind of like how the Chronicles of Nick series alot of people are saying is what is happening in the series so...anyway sorry for the long post.

Title: Re: Proof that Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago?? (CD Spoilers)
Post by: Elegast on February 14, 2013, 12:46:57 AM
Using Tao's technic:

Quote from: Terry Tao
I can't help you much with high-dimensional topology - it's not my field, and I've not picked up the various tricks topologists use to get a grip on the subject - but when dealing with the geometry of high-dimensional (or infinite-dimensional) vector spaces such as R^n, there are plenty of ways to conceptualise these spaces that do not require visualising more than three dimensions directly. For instance, one can view a high-dimensional vector space as a state space for a system with many degrees of freedom. A megapixel image, for instance, is a point in a million-dimensional vector space; by varying the image, one can explore the space, and various subsets of this space correspond to various classes of images.

(http://i1279.photobucket.com/albums/y530/Louis_Sanna/dimensions_zps698e8961.png)

The first three cubes are the usual dimensions.

Then Gryffin suggests that time doesn't exist. He proposes two additional dimensions, represented by the two cubes on the second line.
Time is then a path we are forced to follow in those two dimensions. That path could loop on itself.

Hope that helps.

Post edited as my first version was incorrect.
Title: Re: Proof that Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago?? (CD Spoilers)
Post by: Ms Duck on February 14, 2013, 03:21:38 AM
For what its worth, I understand the theory, Im just not buying it :)

the idea that objects can create themselves bothers me, the free will bothers, the power requirements bothers me..

heck, zombies bother me.

time zombies.

http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Literature/AllYouZombies (http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Literature/AllYouZombies)

there, now you can all share my pain.
Title: Re: Proof that Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago?? (CD Spoilers)
Post by: Griffyn612 on February 14, 2013, 03:32:16 AM
Using Tao's technic:

(http://i1279.photobucket.com/albums/y530/Louis_Sanna/dimensions_zps698e8961.png)

The first three cubes are the usual dimensions.

Then Gryffin suggests that time doesn't exist. He proposes two additional dimensions, represented by the two cubes on the second line.
Time is then a path we are forced to follow in those two dimensions. That path could loop on itself.

Hope that helps.

Post edited as my first version was incorrect.

Not to completely confuse things, and I know there are a multitude of ideas on how many and in what fashion dimensions exist.  Here are 3 spacial dimensions and 3 temporal dimensions, as I see them.

Here Directions
1a) Ahead
1b) Behind
2a) Aside
2b) Beside
3a) Above
3b) Below

Now Directions
A1) What was
A2) What will be
B1) What wasn't
B2) What won't be
C1) What couldn't be
C2) What can't be

For what its worth, I understand the theory, Im just not buying it :)

the idea that objects can create themselves bothers me, the free will bothers, the power requirements bothers me..

heck, zombies bother me.

time zombies.

http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Literature/AllYouZombies (http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Literature/AllYouZombies)

there, now you can all share my pain.

Technically, there are two points for any location.  There is Here, and there is Now.  All I'm suggesting is that one Here (Demonreach) be linked to two Nows (PG and FutureTime).  Clearly Merlin was able to arrange it once, so the power requirements are manageable.  I don't understand your concern about objects creating themselves.  That's based on your time machine example, not the DR temporalBridgePocketDimension example.  Nothing creates itself. 
Title: Re: Proof that Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago?? (CD Spoilers)
Post by: Ms Duck on February 14, 2013, 03:42:35 AM
no, in a stable time loop the event creates itself.

TT Harry fixed LC -> Harry Time travels - > TT harry fixes LC

and I don't believe that possible because it violates conservation :)

its often called the ontological paradox.

Title: Re: Proof that Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago?? (CD Spoilers)
Post by: King Ash on February 14, 2013, 03:48:37 AM
@Griffyn--son of a (expletive expletive expletive). You're right. About 2 seconds after I got the reasoning of your argument about the energy at DR being an interaction with its wards I forgot it when replying to Hollorr. Since I do not currently have dementia, my only excuse is that the temporal echoes thing from an altered timeline makes so much intuitive sense to me it creeps back in when it shouldnt. My bad.
AWWW thanks Griffyn...just when someone says good point..../cry....lol
Anyway both Ms.duck and a few people are hung up about the free will taken away by time traveling...okay there was this movie my grandmother has and I can't remeber the name...I will try to find the name of it, but the whole point of the movie is about a group of archaeology people of medieval times...they go back in time to go save the main toon father from death...but anyway at the very end of the movie, they are heading back to their time in the middle of the battle and 1 stays..he makes a choice to stay behind and it doesn't affect the past or future because it's already happen.....same thing if harry choose to go back in time because of some reason. Harry in the future makes an choice to go back..key point Harry could or won't go back in time at that time he could make a choice...He could for say no and then, well die if the TTH is true but he could say yes of his own free will...I Just don't see harry going back to just save himself...maybe someone else yes but not just going to save his own hide.
IF the TTH is true there must be alot more story then that.
or as someone said a few post ago, it could be a harry from another timeline/ is trying to save himself in another time...kind of like how the Chronicles of Nick series alot of people are saying is what is happening in the series so...anyway sorry for the long post.

Michael Crighton's Timeline?
Title: Re: Proof that Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago?? (CD Spoilers)
Post by: Griffyn612 on February 14, 2013, 04:07:57 AM
Michael Crighton's Timeline?

Ugh, I didn't like that movie.  The book was decent, but nowhere near his best.

no, in a stable time loop the event creates itself.

TT Harry fixed LC -> Harry Time travels - > TT harry fixes LC

and I don't believe that possible because it violates conservation :)

its often called the ontological paradox.

But you're still arguing that what Merlin did in the Dresdenverse is impossible in the Dresdenverse. 

On a related note, my current thinking is that time in the Dresdenverse is a wheel.  The only reason for thinking that is because of the use of FIVE points of time, like the five points of the pentacle used in both Merlin and Harry's magic.  Bob showed a representation of Merlin appearing 5 times in linear fashion to cast the wards, but said that all of them were cast just once in the 5 times.  I think the reason that the number is 5 is because they form a temporal pentacle.  But to do that, time would have to be either a wheel, or a spiral.
Title: Re: Proof that Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago?? (CD Spoilers)
Post by: Ms Duck on February 14, 2013, 04:18:52 AM
Ugh, I didn't like that movie.  The book was decent, but nowhere near his best.

But you're still arguing that what Merlin did in the Dresdenverse is impossible in the Dresdenverse. 

On a related note, my current thinking is that time in the Dresdenverse is a wheel.  The only reason for thinking that is because of the use of FIVE points of time, like the five points of the pentacle used in both Merlin and Harry's magic.  Bob showed a representation of Merlin appearing 5 times in linear fashion to cast the wards, but said that all of them were cast just once in the 5 times.  I think the reason that the number is 5 is because they form a temporal pentacle.  But to do that, time would have to be either a wheel, or a spiral.

No, im not:

because

A: its not a time loop

B: it may not even be time travel

C: we have no frickin idea how it was done

D: a greater god was very likely involved
Title: Re: Proof that Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago?? (CD Spoilers)
Post by: Hex on February 14, 2013, 04:47:20 AM
Quote
Bob: He built it once. In five different times. All at the same time.
Harry: Uh. He was in the same place, doing the same thing, in five different times at once?
Bob: Exactly.
--- later in the conversation----
Quote
Bob: Look, a mortal jail is built in three dimensions, right? Merlin built this one in four, and probably several more, though you can't really tell whether or not he built it in a given dimension until you go there and measure it.

Is it possible Merlin wasn't just in 3 or 4 dimensions when he built DR?
Title: Re: Proof that Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago?? (CD Spoilers)
Post by: Ms Duck on February 14, 2013, 05:37:18 AM
--- later in the conversation----
Is it possible Merlin wasn't just in 3 or 4 dimensions when he built DR?

yup. :)

kind of what ive been saying, I don't think he traveled in time at all
Title: Re: Proof that Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago?? (CD Spoilers)
Post by: Silkki on February 14, 2013, 09:37:08 AM
As I said before, if traveling back in time was not possible for mortals, there wouldn't be a law against swimming against the currents of time. I am not saying Harry can go back to meet Sue while she was still alive. But some form of TT to the past must be possible. Jim simply wouldn't make a law of magic that is irrelevant.

I don't think Merlin travelled back in time to build the prison again. It's possible though. I got the feeling Merlin simply built it in every dimension at the same time. How does that work? Magic! It just seems cooler than him building DR once, then getting a cup of tea and some food, then traveling back in time to do it again, and repeating that for like 12 times.
Title: Re: Proof that Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago?? (CD Spoilers)
Post by: Elegast on February 14, 2013, 12:29:44 PM
Not to completely confuse things, and I know there are a multitude of ideas on how many and in what fashion dimensions exist.  Here are 3 spacial dimensions and 3 temporal dimensions, as I see them.

Here Directions
1a) Ahead
1b) Behind
2a) Aside
2b) Beside
3a) Above
3b) Below

Now Directions
A1) What was
A2) What will be
B1) What wasn't
B2) What won't be
C1) What couldn't be
C2) What can't be

Ok. Then I've absolutely no idea what you're talking about.  ;D
Title: Re: Proof that Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago?? (CD Spoilers)
Post by: Elegast on February 14, 2013, 12:49:24 PM
I don't think he traveled in time at all

Bob says otherwise in Cold Days.
Title: Re: Proof that Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago?? (CD Spoilers)
Post by: Elegast on February 14, 2013, 12:52:05 PM
no, in a stable time loop the event creates itself.

TT Harry fixed LC -> Harry Time travels - > TT harry fixes LC

and I don't believe that possible because it violates conservation :)

its often called the ontological paradox.

It does create the ontological paradox, but does not the law of conservation of history as LC has already been fixed.
Title: Re: Proof that Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago?? (CD Spoilers)
Post by: Ms Duck on February 14, 2013, 01:23:59 PM
It does create the ontological paradox, but does not the law of conservation of history as LC has already been fixed.

there is no law of conservation of history I am aware of. Its conservation of energy its breaking. and that , according to Mother Winter, cannot be done.

according to Jim there is an 'exception' to this in that any law can be broken with sufficient magical power. As Mother winter seemed to disagree, methinks the amount of power to do so must be huge.

Title: Re: Proof that Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago?? (CD Spoilers)
Post by: Elegast on February 14, 2013, 01:25:40 PM
there is no law of conservation of history I am aware of.

Odin in CD.
Title: Re: Proof that Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago?? (CD Spoilers)
Post by: Ms Duck on February 14, 2013, 01:27:48 PM
Odin in CD.

Okies, thanks.

me still talking about energy tho.
Title: Re: Proof that Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago?? (CD Spoilers)
Post by: wizard nelson on February 14, 2013, 01:33:34 PM
TT Harry fixed LC -> Harry Time travels - > TT harry fixes LC. its often called the ontological paradox.
ok... easily solved.
Quote
A predestination paradox is conceptually the opposite of a Grandfather Paradox. It is where something travels back in time and allows itself to travel back in time, where if it had not gone back in time it would not be able to travel back in time.
harry goes back in time so he can go back in time, example-
Quote
A player builds a base to get ready to attack the enemy. Before they can do that the enemy attacks the base in the past destroying it. Before the timewaves reach the present the player chronoports their army at the base in the present back in time to defend the base. The base only continued to exist because units from its future version defended it and the units only continued to exist because they defended the base.
continued-
Title: Re: Proof that Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago?? (CD Spoilers)
Post by: wizard nelson on February 14, 2013, 01:36:50 PM
-continuation
Quote
the timeline is likely to fluctuate
MISS DUCK i could kiss you! this explains perfectly the minor changes in details in the story like why morts hair and home changed. it was a timeline fluctuation brought on by a predestination loop :-* ;D
Title: Re: Proof that Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago?? (CD Spoilers)
Post by: Elegast on February 14, 2013, 01:48:29 PM
The way I understand what you are saying, tell me if I am wrong, is kind of how light is both a wave and a particle, which I know to be true but cannot grasp how it is both at the same time.

It's not that hard (at least on the intuitive level). The trick is to understand that the position of a photon is undefined until measured.

Then the wave is simply a function describing the probability of presence of the photon: when the wave is high the probability is high a photon will be found there if the field is measured.

However, once you measure, the photon will be found in a single and unique location.
Title: Re: Proof that Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago?? (CD Spoilers)
Post by: Ms Duck on February 14, 2013, 01:53:53 PM
-continuation MISS DUCK i could kiss you! this explains perfectly the minor changes in details in the story like why morts hair and home changed. it was a timeline fluctuation brought on by a predestination loop :-* ;D

me explain by the fact that Harrys actually wrote the books (his biography at some time in the future) and may have made some mistakes. Probably because his note turned KFC extra crispy in changes
Title: Re: Proof that Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago?? (CD Spoilers)
Post by: Cenphx on February 14, 2013, 01:54:12 PM
Yeah, its the bit about the position being undefined until measured that bothers me. Heisenberg be damned. I like my particles to be somewhere whether im looking at them or not. :)
Title: Re: Proof that Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago?? (CD Spoilers)
Post by: wizard nelson on February 14, 2013, 01:57:01 PM
me explain by the fact that Harrys actually wrote the books (his biography at some time in the future) and may have made some mistakes. Probably because his note turned KFC extra crispy in changes
room of recollection. shaazam! its why he can usually write in the present tense. he's directly remembering his thoughts in magnified clarity.
Title: Re: Proof that Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago?? (CD Spoilers)
Post by: aShorty21 on February 14, 2013, 02:00:28 PM
Yeah, its the bit about the position being undefined until measured that bothers me. Heisenberg be damned. I like my particles to be somewhere whether im looking at them or not. :)
Agreed.
Title: Re: Proof that Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago?? (CD Spoilers)
Post by: smwood on February 14, 2013, 11:07:56 PM
I figured Lea fixed it.  Her realm is right there in the Never Never.
Title: Re: Proof that Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago?? (CD Spoilers)
Post by: Ms Duck on February 14, 2013, 11:50:09 PM
I figured Lea fixed it.  Her realm is right there in the Never Never.

hi new person !

lea was doing an icicle impression. which is why Mab was covering for her :)
Title: Re: Proof that Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago?? (CD Spoilers)
Post by: smwood on February 15, 2013, 03:02:50 AM
Perhaps Mab then, as her proxy.
Title: Re: Proof that Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago?? (CD Spoilers)
Post by: Polka Aficionado on February 15, 2013, 04:48:37 AM
Or Harry could have noticed the problem before trying to use it again. Then Harry would have to fix it before using it again, and not allow himself to spend valuable time not saving Molly's fine goth behind. If he fixed it the next week after he recovers from whatever almost destroys his mind, then he would not need all that much energy to fix it, right. Or, much more likely, I understand very little about this idea and need a nap.
Title: Re: Proof that Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago?? (CD Spoilers)
Post by: Ms Duck on February 15, 2013, 05:07:44 AM
Perhaps Mab then, as her proxy.

that may have been suggested once or twice

http://www.jimbutcheronline.com/bb/index.php/topic,32663.msg1452190.html#msg1452190 (http://www.jimbutcheronline.com/bb/index.php/topic,32663.msg1452190.html#msg1452190)

 ;D
Title: Re: Proof that Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago?? (CD Spoilers)
Post by: wizard nelson on February 16, 2013, 05:30:17 AM
that may have been suggested once or twice

http://www.jimbutcheronline.com/bb/index.php/topic,32663.msg1452190.html#msg1452190 (http://www.jimbutcheronline.com/bb/index.php/topic,32663.msg1452190.html#msg1452190)

 ;D
ever think of redoing this with knowledge of
(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: Proof that Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago?? (CD Spoilers)
Post by: Ms Duck on February 16, 2013, 05:33:58 AM
ever think of redoing this with knowledge of
(click to show/hide)

(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: Proof that Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago?? (CD Spoilers)
Post by: Discussion Bored on February 16, 2013, 09:30:58 PM
A couple of things -- first, I listened to many of the books instead of reading them (job involves a lot of car travel, so it works out well).  So I can't easily refer back to the books, and therefore apologize if I misremember something that was explained.  Also, I'm approaching this from a "many universes" perspective. Okay, that being said:

I'm not sure free will is necessarily violated by time travel. If Harry goes back in time to fix LC, he would be alone in his basement (except for Bob, who may or may not have noticed).  So even if free will resets and everyone has the opportunity to make different choices, there really aren't any new conditions that would lead them to make different choices.  If you travel back but don't interact with anyone (or, in Bob's case, only interact with those that can understand the implications of telling your past self you were there and agrees not to -- or agrees to forget the interaction), there isn't really a reason to think free will is violated.

Looking at the issue with the assumption that there are infinite universes based at least in part on decisions that are made, there must exist a universe where Harry has the knowledge and power to time travel, as well as the knowledge of the need to fix LC.  When that Harry travels back in time to fix LC, he collapses all those universe divergences back together and makes his change.  So his actions redefine the conditions under which choices are freely made.

I'm not saying it's the most likely option, but I don't think it's impossible.

Title: Re: Proof that Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago?? (CD Spoilers)
Post by: Ms Duck on February 16, 2013, 09:45:03 PM
hi Lurker !


two thoughts:

In the DF, as far as we know, the other potential universes don't collapse- they continue to exist. That's why even someone who can see the future, like Mab, can't be 100% correct- there are two many possible future universes.

second, the idea that just because people face the exact same decision again they will make the exact same choice is probably a bit off too. Uriel says most people are predictable, but some aren't. In the zillions and zillions of decisions made in that time loop, all it would take would be a few key ones off to throw the loop out of loop.

its the monkeys writing Shakespeare problem, except this time we would need the exact same monkey to write the exact same page.  ;)
Title: Re: Proof that Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago?? (CD Spoilers)
Post by: Discussion Bored on February 16, 2013, 10:22:56 PM
Quote
In the DF, as far as we know, the other potential universes don't collapse- they continue to exist. That's why even someone who can see the future, like Mab, can't be 100% correct- there are two many possible future universes.

Maybe collapse was the wrong word.  I was trying to say that TTH was going back to a time before the universes diverge at the decision point.

Quote
second, the idea that just because people face the exact same decision again they will make the exact same choice is probably a bit off too. Uriel says most people are predictable, but some aren't. In the zillions and zillions of decisions made in that time loop, all it would take would be a few key ones off to throw the loop out of loop.

But there will exist at least one universe where all the same decisions are made, and from one of those universes will TTH originate.


Now, this is all a little convenient.  Anything could be explained as "well, this is the universe where that is possible."  So I'm not sold on the TTH Harry idea myself -- Mab does seem more likely.  But I do think it has to be possible.
Title: Re: Proof that Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago?? (CD Spoilers)
Post by: Ms Duck on February 17, 2013, 12:21:29 AM
frankly it all smacks of discworld's super strong androcentric principle, from which you can conclude the entire purpose of the universe was to supply me with a nice a sandwich and a beer.
Title: Re: Proof that Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago?? (CD Spoilers)
Post by: Hex on February 17, 2013, 01:30:13 AM
I can't shake the feeling the Mother Summer was behind fixing LC. Harry's survival/success seems to keep increasing the number of potential bright futures she sees. And pretty much everyone says yes ma'am when she gives them an order.
Title: Re: Proof that Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago?? (CD Spoilers)
Post by: Discussion Bored on February 17, 2013, 09:49:08 PM
frankly it all smacks of discworld's super strong androcentric principle, from which you can conclude the entire purpose of the universe was to supply me with a nice a sandwich and a beer.

Well, I think a universe dedicated to providing sandwiches and beer is something we can all get behind.  :)
Title: Re: Proof that Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago?? (CD Spoilers)
Post by: Ms Duck on February 17, 2013, 10:34:20 PM
Well, I think a universe dedicated to providing sandwiches and beer is something we can all get behind.  :)

since the odds against the  universe evolving the way it did are incalculable, one can conclude that its was the purpose of the universe to evolve  the way it did;

since the odds against the  universe evolving intelligent life the way it did are incalculable, one can conclude that its was the purpose of the universe to evolve intelligent life  the way it did;

 since the odds against the  universe evolving me in particular the way it did are incalculable, one can conclude that its was the purpose of the universe to evolve  me the way it did;

ergo, since i am eating  a ham sandwich with extra honey mustard right now, one can conclude the entire purpose of the universe is to provide me with a ham sandwich. 
Title: Re: Proof that Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago?? (CD Spoilers)
Post by: the neurovore of Zur-En-Aargh on February 18, 2013, 04:37:08 AM
since the odds against the  universe evolving the way it did are incalculable, one can conclude that its was the purpose of the universe to evolve  the way it did;
since the odds against the  universe evolving intelligent life the way it did are incalculable, one can conclude that its was the purpose of the universe to evolve intelligent life  the way it did;
 since the odds against the  universe evolving me in particular the way it did are incalculable, one can conclude that its was the purpose of the universe to evolve  me the way it did;
ergo, since i am eating  a ham sandwich with extra honey mustard right now, one can conclude the entire purpose of the universe is to provide me with a ham sandwich.

The odds of anything that has already happened having happened are 100%/
Title: Re: Proof that Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago?? (CD Spoilers)
Post by: Ms Duck on February 18, 2013, 06:33:53 AM
The odds of anything that has already happened having happened are 100%/

now now Neuro, you wouldn't disagree with terry pratchet, would you?

:D
Title: Re: Proof that Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago?? (CD Spoilers)
Post by: the neurovore of Zur-En-Aargh on February 19, 2013, 01:43:55 PM
now now Neuro, you wouldn't disagree with terry pratchet, would you?

The first time I met him, he asked me what the secret of my sexual success was.  That kind of disinclined me to excessive reference.
Title: Re: Proof that Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago?? (CD Spoilers)
Post by: Dedwrekka on February 19, 2013, 07:52:34 PM
(click to show/hide)
(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: Proof that Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago?? (CD Spoilers)
Post by: Ms Duck on February 19, 2013, 09:27:36 PM
(click to show/hide)

(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: Proof that Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago?? (CD Spoilers)
Post by: Griffyn612 on February 19, 2013, 10:13:07 PM


(click to show/hide)

So why is Parasite causing the same type of headaches as the ones Harry experienced when his mind was apparently Mabipulated?  Specifically, the "pain in the temples", which are attributed to the Parasite in CD, but were previously described during his lapses (SmF blasting rod; TC LC).

 :o   Oooooooohhhh....

Maybe Mab isn't causing the headaches.  Nor is her manipulation of his mind.  When you think about it, Mab should be able to leave no trace of her manipulation, right?

But what if the headaches are the Parasite's attempts to draw his attention?  What if it's Lash trying to point a neon sign at the parts of Harry's brain that Mab manipulated?

The first time, in regards to the blasting rod, Harry doesn't hear Michael say the words.  His mind is prevented from even recognizing those words together.  But then he has the shooting pain, and he remembers the words, and then their relationship to him.

The second time, Harry seems to have no recollection of LC.  He sits and tries tracking spells in the circle in his lab.  It's not until after he tells Molly that he hesitates after saying he has no idea what to do next that he has the shooting pain. 

What if Lash was saying "Blasting rod, idjit!" and "Try LC, idjit!", and it came across as ice-picks-to-the-temples headaches.
Title: Re: Proof that Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago?? (CD Spoilers)
Post by: Ms Duck on February 20, 2013, 12:54:36 AM
(click to show/hide)

So why is Parasite causing the same type of headaches as the ones Harry experienced when his mind was apparently Mabipulated?  Specifically, the "pain in the temples", which are attributed to the Parasite in CD, but were previously described during his lapses (SmF blasting rod; TC LC).

 :o   Oooooooohhhh....

Maybe Mab isn't causing the headaches.  Nor is her manipulation of his mind.  When you think about it, Mab should be able to leave no trace of her manipulation, right?

But what if the headaches are the Parasite's attempts to draw his attention?  What if it's Lash trying to point a neon sign at the parts of Harry's brain that Mab manipulated?

The first time, in regards to the blasting rod, Harry doesn't hear Michael say the words.  His mind is prevented from even recognizing those words together.  But then he has the shooting pain, and he remembers the words, and then their relationship to him.

The second time, Harry seems to have no recollection of LC.  He sits and tries tracking spells in the circle in his lab.  It's not until after he tells Molly that he hesitates after saying he has no idea what to do next that he has the shooting pain. 

What if Lash was saying "Blasting rod, idjit!" and "Try LC, idjit!", and it came across as ice-picks-to-the-temples headaches.

according to SmF, the headaches are natural reactions to when someone changes a person's memories. If you recall, harry had his firsts et when mab took his blasting rod.
Title: Re: Proof that Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago?? (CD Spoilers)
Post by: Griffyn612 on February 20, 2013, 01:04:20 AM
according to SmF, the headaches are natural reactions to when someone changes a person's memories. If you recall, harry had his firsts et when mab took his blasting rod.

No, when Mab manipulated Harry in SmF, she froze his eyes and kissed his ear.  That's presumably when she laid her memory compulsion on him.  And it may have triggered Lash.  What if the resurrection of Lash was partly -- accidentally -- induced by Mab's memory manipulations?

Then the headaches occur when her compulsion kicks in.  Lash is trying to warn Harry, causing the headache.
Title: Re: Proof that Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago?? (CD Spoilers)
Post by: Ms Duck on February 20, 2013, 07:11:56 AM
No, when Mab manipulated Harry in SmF, she froze his eyes and kissed his ear.  That's presumably when she laid her memory compulsion on him.  And it may have triggered Lash.  What if the resurrection of Lash was partly -- accidentally -- induced by Mab's memory manipulations?

Then the headaches occur when her compulsion kicks in.  Lash is trying to warn Harry, causing the headache.

problem with that theory is Mab swore to stop messing with his head at the end of GS- and some of those headaches were damn convenient for Mab
Title: Re: Proof that Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago?? (CD Spoilers)
Post by: beetnemesis on February 20, 2013, 04:58:25 PM

b) Not be noticed/or mentioned later by Bob the Skull
-- also lampshaded in cold days. Mab always knew bob was there; Harry notes this in CD

Wait, I think I must have missed this.  Where does it say Mab always knew Bob was there?
Title: Re: Proof that Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago?? (CD Spoilers)
Post by: Ms Duck on February 20, 2013, 05:09:02 PM
Wait, I think I must have missed this.  Where does it say Mab always knew Bob was there?

when she had a car waiting to go get Bob... the one person who could tell Harry how to kill Maeve.

page 95, hard back, cold days.
Title: Re: Proof that Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago?? (CD Spoilers)
Post by: 123456789blaaa on February 20, 2013, 05:21:37 PM
The first time I met him, he asked me what the secret of my sexual success was.  That kind of disinclined me to excessive reference.

Wat
Title: Re: Proof that Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago?? (CD Spoilers)
Post by: the neurovore of Zur-En-Aargh on February 20, 2013, 08:26:18 PM
Wat

Sorry, that should be "reverence", not "reference".
Title: Re: Proof that Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago?? (CD Spoilers)
Post by: 123456789blaaa on February 20, 2013, 08:33:18 PM
Sorry, that should be "reverence", not "reference".

No, I mean...THE Terry Pratchett, the creator of the discworld books... asked you what the secret of your sexu-I mean. Wat

Wat.

Wat. 

 :o
Title: Re: Proof that Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago?? (CD Spoilers)
Post by: the neurovore of Zur-En-Aargh on February 20, 2013, 08:43:49 PM
No, I mean...THE Terry Pratchett, the creator of the discworld books... asked you what the secret of your sexu-I mean. Wat

He knew me online, some time ago.  Different world, different alias, but a couple of decades ago there were Pratchett fan communities that had some similarities to this here forum in terms of groups of cool people getting to know each other through a common interest; except largely UK-centric, so quite a bit easier to meet each other in person also. As for the rest, well, I got a fortune cookie this weekend saying people find it difficult to resist my persuasive manner. *waggles eyebrows*

If I ever do publish fiction of my own, I intend to see whether I can get that quote on the back (along with Steve Brust calling me cute and JB's "dear god are you a CIA analyst or something").
Title: Re: Proof that Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago?? (CD Spoilers)
Post by: Dedwrekka on February 20, 2013, 09:11:27 PM
Does Vadderung telling Harry that a mortal wizard can't possibly draw enough power to go back in time have any play in the conversation?

according to SmF, the headaches are natural reactions to when someone changes a person's memories. If you recall, harry had his firsts et when mab took his blasting rod.
Actually, as I've been rereading through the series, I've been compiling a headache journal for Harry.
The first time in the series he complains about a headache not related to an injury is in Fool Moon.
However, there's another series of headaches that happen where Harry has a headache, and then does something uncharacteristic. It's most obvious and frequent in Cold Days, but it's also happened in the series for some time, and at least one such occurrence happens in Summer Knight.
Title: Re: Proof that Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago?? (CD Spoilers)
Post by: Ms Duck on February 20, 2013, 09:29:48 PM
Does Vadderung telling Harry that a mortal wizard can't possibly draw enough power to go back in time have any play in the conversation?
Actually, as I've been rereading through the series, I've been compiling a headache journal for Harry.
The first time in the series he complains about a headache not related to an injury is in Fool Moon.
However, there's another series of headaches that happen where Harry has a headache, and then does something uncharacteristic. It's most obvious and frequent in Cold Days, but it's also happened in the series for some time, and at least one such occurrence happens in Summer Knight.

there's one specific type of headache that occurs first in SmF, however:

the two piercing points of cold, like a pair of icicles shoved into his brain.

occurs in SmF (in relation to Mab and the rod), In TC (when harry is about to get mouse to lead him to Thomas)(also with the missing LC) and again in CD.

its like a giant 'Mab was here' sign.

He knew me online, some time ago.  Different world, different alias, but a couple of decades ago there were Pratchett fan communities that had some similarities to this here forum in terms of groups of cool people getting to know each other through a common interest; except largely UK-centric, so quite a bit easier to meet each other in person also. As for the rest, well, I got a fortune cookie this weekend saying people find it difficult to resist my persuasive manner. *waggles eyebrows*

If I ever do publish fiction of my own, I intend to see whether I can get that quote on the back (along with Steve Brust calling me cute and JB's "dear god are you a CIA analyst or something").

what nothing from Charles Stross?

 ;D
Title: Re: Proof that Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago?? (CD Spoilers)
Post by: Dedwrekka on February 20, 2013, 09:36:43 PM
there's one specific type of headache that occurs first in SmF, however:

the two piercing points of cold, like a pair of icicles shoved into his brain.

occurs in SmF (in relation to Mab and the rod), In TC (when harry is about to get mouse to lead him to Thomas)(also with the missing LC) and again in CD.

its like a giant 'Mab was here' sign.

However, we have excellent proof that the "Parasite" has been causing headaches, and that it's separate from Mab, from both Ghost Story and Cold Days.
So, while I'm not saying some didn't come from Mab's mind warp, I'm doubting all of them did.

Also, there's a lot more than headaches that come from someone messing with your mind, and we have plenty of proof of that from the series starting at Proven Guilty.
Title: Re: Proof that Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago?? (CD Spoilers)
Post by: Cenphx on February 20, 2013, 11:08:09 PM
Actually, as I've been rereading through the series, I've been compiling a headache journal for Harry.
The first time in the series he complains about a headache not related to an injury is in Fool Moon.
However, there's another series of headaches that happen where Harry has a headache, and then does something uncharacteristic. It's most obvious and frequent in Cold Days, but it's also happened in the series for some time, and at least one such occurrence happens in Summer Knight.

Here's a thread with a list of all the headaches, when they occur and what the context of the headache was....http://www.jimbutcheronline.com/bb/index.php/topic,35813.msg1701063.html#msg1701063
Title: Re: Proof that Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago?? (CD Spoilers)
Post by: Ms Duck on February 20, 2013, 11:08:25 PM
However, we have excellent proof that the "Parasite" has been causing headaches, and that it's separate from Mab, from both Ghost Story and Cold Days.
So, while I'm not saying some didn't come from Mab's mind warp, I'm doubting all of them did.

Also, there's a lot more than headaches that come from someone messing with your mind, and we have plenty of proof of that from the series starting at Proven Guilty.

we know one headache was caused by Mab

we know one was caused by the parasite

we know Mab and the parasite made a deal

we know Mab promised to stop messing with Harry's head in GS

what we don't know is what caused the incidents in TC
Title: Re: Proof that Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago?? (CD Spoilers)
Post by: Hex on February 21, 2013, 12:07:47 AM
Quote
we know Mab promised to stop messing with Harry's head in GS

Where in the book did this happen? I don't recall this happening.
Title: Re: Proof that Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago?? (CD Spoilers)
Post by: Griffyn612 on February 21, 2013, 12:43:32 AM
we know one headache was caused by Mab

we know one was caused by the parasite

we know Mab and the parasite made a deal

we know Mab promised to stop messing with Harry's head in GS

what we don't know is what caused the incidents in TC

Which headache do we know was Mab's fault?  Are you referring to the one at the end of SmF, after she's given his blasting rod back?  Because that was caused by hearing her voice when she was angry.

Where in the book did this happen? I don't recall this happening.
In the final scene of GS, Harry says she can't screw with his head.  Technically, she never acknowledges that.  So its debatable whether she agreed to it or not.
Title: Re: Proof that Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago?? (CD Spoilers)
Post by: KrelianZG on February 21, 2013, 01:35:25 AM
In the final scene of GS, Harry says she can't screw with his head.  Technically, she never acknowledges that.  So its debatable whether she agreed to it or not.

I don't doubt that she may have coerced Lash (assuming that's the parasite, insert your own name if you believe otherwise) to react to a few specific things re: mind control, but I really doubt Mab's actively screwing with his head these days, agreement or not. She put a lot of work into getting Harry because he's Harry. The end of CD proves that. I think any other mortal who pulled a stunt like Harry did at the very end with her would be wishing they were dead right now. She wants Harry Dresden. Not some patchwork mental zombie version of him.

Her manipulation re: the blasting rod could have been solved by a conversation with him instead, maybe, but her reasons were totally sound.

What things does she need to hide from him these days?
Title: Re: Proof that Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago?? (CD Spoilers)
Post by: Griffyn612 on February 21, 2013, 01:56:37 AM
I don't doubt that she may have coerced Lash (assuming that's the parasite, insert your own name if you believe otherwise) to react to a few specific things re: mind control, but I really doubt Mab's actively screwing with his head these days, agreement or not. She put a lot of work into getting Harry because he's Harry. The end of CD proves that. I think any other mortal who pulled a stunt like Harry did at the very end with her would be wishing they were dead right now. She wants Harry Dresden. Not some patchwork mental zombie version of him.

Her manipulation re: the blasting rod could have been solved by a conversation with him instead, maybe, but her reasons were totally sound.

What things does she need to hide from him these days?

I think it's a mistake to assume we know everything that Mab has and will be plotting.  And Harry's threat to lay down against manipulation is only valid if he realizes what's happening.  If she can twist him without his realizing it, then it may suit her purposes, and still leave her with a functioning Knight. 
Title: Re: Proof that Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago?? (CD Spoilers)
Post by: Ms Duck on February 21, 2013, 02:19:37 AM
Which headache do we know was Mab's fault?  Are you referring to the one at the end of SmF, after she's given his blasting rod back?  Because that was caused by hearing her voice when she was angry.
In the final scene of GS, Harry says she can't screw with his head.  Technically, she never acknowledges that.  So its debatable whether she agreed to it or not.

the one where he tries to think about the rod but can't
Title: Re: Proof that Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago?? (CD Spoilers)
Post by: Griffyn612 on February 21, 2013, 02:29:48 AM
the one where he tries to think about the rod but can't

Sure, we think it was Mab.  But it might have been co-opted to Lash.

I mean, it's not like we have evidence that the Fae can steal memories from someone with a kiss. 

 ::)  (completely ignores Lea doing the exact same thing to Susan in GP)
Title: Re: Proof that Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago?? (CD Spoilers)
Post by: the neurovore of Zur-En-Aargh on February 21, 2013, 03:35:00 PM
I mean, it's not like we have evidence that the Fae can steal memories from someone with a kiss. 
 ::)  (completely ignores Lea doing the exact same thing to Susan in GP)

And indeed, they can't; those memories were still right there when Harry unglamoured them.
Title: Re: Proof that Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago?? (CD Spoilers)
Post by: aShorty21 on February 21, 2013, 03:39:21 PM
And indeed, they can't; those memories were still right there when Harry unglamoured them.
That might of been a special case since they were tied to the soul gaze they had shared.
Title: Re: Proof that Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago?? (CD Spoilers)
Post by: Ms Duck on February 21, 2013, 03:47:05 PM
And indeed, they can't; those memories were still right there when Harry unglamoured them.

and Harry's memories returned when Michael did his lay on hands trick

yall avoiding the point at the end where Mab admits she took his rod, ya know.
Title: Re: Proof that Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago?? (CD Spoilers)
Post by: aShorty21 on February 21, 2013, 03:59:13 PM
yall avoiding the point at the end where Mab admits she took his rod, ya know.
I don't think I'll forget any time Mab takes Harry's rod  ;)

But I think we are dealing with special cases. Mab just blocked the memories of the Rod. She never intended for them to always be gone. And Michael had some WG (or Angelic) aid in removing said memory block.

I totally think that Mab is capable of completly removing standard memories from Harry's mind. She may or may not be able to remove a memory from the Sight or a SoulGaze. After GS, I don't believe that any memory is irretrivably lost. I believe that someone could restore said memories from Harry's soul to his concious body.

Title: Re: Proof that Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago?? (CD Spoilers)
Post by: Dedwrekka on February 21, 2013, 04:35:38 PM
and Harry's memories returned when Michael did his lay on hands trick

yall avoiding the point at the end where Mab admits she took his rod, ya know.
We know mortal magic causes all sorts of problems with the person's head. both with the victim and the caster. However, the Fae are able to remove memories and affect anyone within their court or to who they've made a bargain. It's entirely possible that they can do this without causing the same harm to either the victim or themselves. We don't see Fix having headaches because of the compulsion he's under, and we don't see Susan having a constant headache when she's had memories removed.
Title: Re: Proof that Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago?? (CD Spoilers)
Post by: Ms Duck on February 21, 2013, 05:42:17 PM
We know mortal magic causes all sorts of problems with the person's head. both with the victim and the caster. However, the Fae are able to remove memories and affect anyone within their court or to who they've made a bargain. It's entirely possible that they can do this without causing the same harm to either the victim or themselves. We don't see Fix having headaches because of the compulsion he's under, and we don't see Susan having a constant headache when she's had memories removed.

its first person. Unless they said something, they wouldn't
Title: Re: Proof that Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago?? (CD Spoilers)
Post by: aShorty21 on February 21, 2013, 05:49:43 PM
We don't see Fix having headaches because of the compulsion he's under, and we don't see Susan having a constant headache when she's had memories removed.
What compulsion is Fix under? And the majority of the time Susan's memories were removed, she was off screen.
Title: Re: Proof that Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago?? (CD Spoilers)
Post by: KrelianZG on February 21, 2013, 05:52:00 PM
What compulsion is Fix under? And the majority of the time Susan's memories were removed, she was off screen.

When he and Lily couldn't give Harry any direct aid or information in Proven Guilty.
Title: Re: Proof that Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago?? (CD Spoilers)
Post by: peregrine on February 21, 2013, 05:52:51 PM
Fix and Lily were prohibited from speaking about why Titania wasn't moving her armies to respond to the RC encroachment.  (I think that's what it was).

Of course, they knew about it, so their memory wasn't wiped, they just couldn't talk about it, no way of knowing what exactly was going on there.
Title: Re: Proof that Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago?? (CD Spoilers)
Post by: aShorty21 on February 21, 2013, 05:53:49 PM
When he and Lily couldn't give Harry any direct aid or information in Proven Guilty.
Right, then I call apples and oranges. A cumpulsion not to talk to Harry about a topic isn't the same as removing a memory, or least doesn't have to be.
Title: Re: Proof that Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago?? (CD Spoilers)
Post by: the neurovore of Zur-En-Aargh on February 21, 2013, 06:20:39 PM
Right, then I call apples and oranges. A cumpulsion not to talk to Harry about a topic isn't the same as removing a memory, or least doesn't have to be.

I'm not seeing that we have a single example of memories actually being removed rather than masked.
Title: Re: Proof that Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago?? (CD Spoilers)
Post by: aShorty21 on February 21, 2013, 06:57:17 PM
I'm not seeing that we have a single example of memories actually being removed rather than masked.
I'll go along with that. Not saying that it isn't possible (I believe it is), but I do agree that we don't seem to have an example.
Title: Re: Proof that Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago?? (CD Spoilers)
Post by: Dedwrekka on February 22, 2013, 05:56:09 AM
Figured I'd ask here before I started my own, but is there a topic listing all the guns still hanging on the wall already done up without the wags?
Right, then I call apples and oranges. A cumpulsion not to talk to Harry about a topic isn't the same as removing a memory, or least doesn't have to be.
Molly put a compulsion on her friends using fear and drove one of them completely insane, and caused the other a huge amount of psychic problems. Compulsions aren't nice stuff when mortals do it. Fae seem to just do magic better.
Title: Re: Proof that Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago?? (CD Spoilers)
Post by: Hex on February 22, 2013, 08:30:09 PM
This is also comparing a teenager with no magical training to sidhe with centuries or more of magical experience.
Title: Re: Proof that Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago?? (CD Spoilers)
Post by: aShorty21 on February 22, 2013, 09:13:13 PM
This is also comparing a teenager with no magical training to sidhe with centuries or more of magical experience.
Like comparing apple seeds to apple trees :)
Title: Re: Proof that Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago?? (CD Spoilers)
Post by: peregrine on February 22, 2013, 09:25:17 PM
Don't forget that the guy who was driven insane was done so, not just because of the mindwhammie, but also because Molly wanted to punish him.
Title: Re: Proof that Time Travel Harry did not fix Little Chicago?? (CD Spoilers)
Post by: aShorty21 on February 22, 2013, 09:40:42 PM
Don't forget that the guy who was driven insane was done so, not just because of the mindwhammie, but also because Molly wanted to punish him.
Both the friends were going crazy. Boyfriend was going crazy with no possible return trip because of the subconcious push by Molly.