ParanetOnline

The Dresden Files => DF Spoilers => DF Reference Collection => Topic started by: Serack on June 22, 2012, 05:14:52 PM

Title: Reference: X compared to Y = possible Discrepancy?
Post by: Serack on June 22, 2012, 05:14:52 PM
Ok, I am trying to do this reference topic carefully because even though Jim admits he is fallibly human (http://www.jimbutcheronline.com/bb/index.php/topic,11009.msg462569.html#msg462569), occasionaly when people point out instances of this, his fandom is rather enthusiastic in their defense of his work.

So since topics about individual possible Discrepancies show up around here rather cyclically, because the official FAQ version of this (http://www.jimbutcheronline.com/bb/index.php/topic,551.0.html) topic hasn't been updated in quite a while, and because I seem to enjoy making reference topics, I thought I would start working on this one.

In the spirit of respect for Jim, and his fans, if you contribute to this reference, please try to do so in a manor that does just that, and that acknoledges that Jim has been able to do a great job of finding creative, cohesive ways to get such discrepancies to work quite well within the world he has created.  (Here's an example)

Edit:  For an alternate explanation for any discrepancy you mind find, there is this video (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sVgVB3qsySQ).  (Brought to my attention by groinkick (http://www.jimbutcheronline.com/bb/index.php?action=profile;u=42083))

Quote from: Patrick Rothfuss interviews Jim Butcher
PR: Harry is the “get back up” guy.
JB: He is. He is. And that was a very conscious choice in the beginning, too. I wanted a guy that I could beat up a lot. And it wasn't actually until about the fourth book in that a fan pointed out, “hey, you've done this, and this, and this, and this, and this, and he's taken all these injuries here. I'm a professional therapist, and he would take this much therapy to get back from this, and he would never recover from this..” and I'm like, “wow, you really have beaten him up a lot. You know, wizards must just be better at getting better than other people, I need to write that in. Hey, we'll tie that in with how long they live, and, okay, cool. That works. That's good.”
PR: I always think of that in terms of course correction. You get some feedback, or a Beta reader gives you...
JB: Absolutely.
PR: And then you're like, “oh, that's a really good point, I guess you can't have a million people living in a pre-industrial society, you know, everyone dies of dysentery.” So, how much of that do you tend to  engage in as the series goes on, because you have a story and a story and a story, whereas I tend to do a huge block of story, and then there's a three-year gap, how much course direction would you say you do  with the overall story in between books based on feedback?
JB: Considerable. I mean, when someone has a good point they have a good point, and I'm not a perfect person, so when someone will point something like that out, I'll go, “okay, how can I take this and how can I use it as part of the story, and either keep it the way it is and have a good reason for it to be that way, or else spin it, or fix it, or have somebody realize something new about the world that hasn't been brought out before. I mean, that's kind of the creative challenge is kind of “how to make this cooler  and better?” and not, “how do I let this be a big hole in my story somewhere?” How to make it stronger, instead of less.
PR: And I think one of the great strengths of your writing is the reasonableness of it. Because sometimes you can tell somebody's patching a plot-hole, and it's just like they're putting a poster over the hole in the wall, but when you present one of these explanations, it's so smooth, and it makes such good, rational sense, that it seems like you built it in from the very beginning.
JB: Yes! Oh, I did. All of it. Word for word, I've got it all laid out. On a scroll.

As for formatting, here is what I want to do.  Within this post I will make a list of the common "Discrepancies."  Eventually as this topic gets fleshed out, I want to make individual posts within the topic that explain the details in depth with lots of refrences and stuff, and have links embedded in the "List."  Your help building up those detailed posts will be much appreciated, and cited.


* may need some references or other work
Title: Re: Exploritory Reference: X compared to Y = possible Discrepancy?
Post by: Serack on June 22, 2012, 05:34:27 PM
When did Mort actually go Full on Xavier?

In Ghost Story, we get a description of Mort and his home.  The thing is, although it matches up with many of the details that have been described in earlier books, it does it in a haphazard fashion that leaves some really odd gaps.

Quote from: GS Ch. 3
It was an odd home, for Chicago—a white stucco number with a red tile roof that looked like it had been transplanted from Southern California.

Quote from: GS Ch. 4
Mortimer Lindquist seemed to have finally given in to the inevitable. I’d seen him with a bad toupee, and with an even worse comb-over, but this was the first time I’d seen him sporting a full-on Charles Xavier. The unbroken shine of his pate looked a lot better than the partial coverage.  He’d lost weight, too, since the last I’d seen him. I mean, he wasn’t going to be modeling for Abercrombie & Fitch or anything, but he’d definitely dropped from self-destructively obese down to merely stout.

Now here are the descriptions from Dead Beat:
Quote from: DB Ch. 10
Mortimer Linquist had done pretty well for himself over the past couple years, and he'd moved out of the little california-import stucco ranch house he'd been in the last time I'd gone to visit him.  Now he was working out of a converted duplex in Bucktown.

Quote from: DB Ch. 10
He was short, twenty of thirty pounds overweight, and had given up trying to conceal his receding hairline in favor of shaving his scalp completely bald.

These differences are rather convoluted in how they mix and match the facts we knew about Mort, and what Harry knew about Mort before GS.  Also keep in mind that Harry had to write down the address to where he wanted to go at the beginning of GS, rather than just verbally saying "Take me to this person."

Finally, we have confirmation from a Beta that the Beta readers pointed out this discrepancy to Jim before it got to us.  This doesn't rule out that a genuine mistake was made and still ended up going to publishing anyways, and it doesn't rule out the idea that it wasn't intentional, and will be significant later either.

For now it looks suspiciously like a Discrepancy, and thus is noted here

This topic (http://www.jimbutcheronline.com/bb/index.php/topic,26872.0.html), started back when the sample chapters were being released for GS, is dedicated to this issue.
Title: Re: Exploritory Reference: X compared to Y = possible Discrepancy?
Post by: knnn on June 22, 2012, 05:57:09 PM
Thank you for doing this Serack.

Some others I am aware of that might be on the list (mainly minor, and possibly have other explanations):

- Murphy's P90 that fell into the lake gets found.
- Harry's fifth floor office is on the fourth floor.
- Molly's age jumps by 1.
- Missing "!" in Splattercon!!!.
- NN around Harry's apt.
- Kemmler takedown in '45 vs. '61
- Thomas' height (he's apparently shrinking).
- Not using full Name when binding Demonreach.
- 429B baker street (not sure if this counts as a discrepency).
- Confused denarian body count.
- Archive mother discrepancy.
- Minor practitioner body-count in WN (AKA "the Skavis only got 1").
Title: Re: Exploritory Reference: X compared to Y = possible Discrepancy?
Post by: Serack on June 22, 2012, 06:12:02 PM
Thank you for doing this Serack.

Some others I am aware of that might be on the list (mainly minor, and possibly have other explanations):

- Murphy's P90 that fell into the lake gets found.
I always thought she just got a new one.  Does it still have the engraved plate?

- Harry's fifth floor office is on the fourth floor.
Needs expounding

- Molly's age jumps by 1.
Not familiar with this, but it's likely to be dismissable. 

- Missing "!" in Splattercon!!!.
Really?  sounds nitpicky :P (If you haven't listened to Marster's narration of PG, you should just to hear him get disgusted with the exclimation points by the 3rd or 4th time saying them)

- NN around Harry's apt.
This one needs a major post.  Heck, maybe we will end up with a topic for it in the eventual "Archive"

- Kemmler takedown in '45 vs. '61
Hmmm, I don't know the details of this.  However Bob did say he was taken down multiple times, so the explenation must show that this doesn't explain it

- Thomas' height (he's apparently shrinking).
Covered already.  (The Case of the Shrinking Wampire)

- Not using full Name when binding Demonreach.
If you think it's significant write it out... I need convincing...

- 229B baker street (not sure if this counts as a discrepency).
huh?

- Confused denarian body count.
I would chalk this up to general confusion... meh, if someone thinks it's important than they should write it up :)

- Archive mother discrepancy.
Good one.  I'm sure I've done a thorough write up of this one, but I'd have to find it Edit:  Here we go (http://www.jimbutcheronline.com/bb/index.php/topic,31714.msg1366384.html#msg1366384)

- Minor practitioner body-count in WN (AKA "the Skavis only got 1").
Not familar with it
Title: Re: Exploritory Reference: X compared to Y = possible Discrepancy?
Post by: Serack on June 22, 2012, 06:16:26 PM
Ivy's Backstory:

her [Ivy's] mother commited suicide irrc, does that mean that if she wouldn't have died, then ivy would have been
alive and her mother at the same time ?
wasn't it mentioned that when an archive is born, the previous one dies and powers/knowledge is passed on to the next generation ?

Yes and yes.  When Ivy was originaly introduced Jim intended for the character to be a 1 time deal however he liked how Harry's character reacted to her so much that he ended up bringing her back in a more important role and part of that involved a little retconning (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Retroactive_continuity).  In DM Ivy explained that she obtained the Archive upon birth and that her mother upon passing it to her entered a vegitative state, the same as her mother before her and on down the line.  However, this story was changed in DM, and the new background story was provided by Luccio in chapter 46 (page 378 in my e-book).

The original origin story:
Quote from: DM ch 10
"How did you get this gig?"
"My mother passed it on to me," she replied.  "As I was born, just as she received it when she was born."

"And your mother lets a mercenary drive you around?"

"Certainly not.  My mother is dead, wizard."  She frowned.  "Not dead, technically.  But all that she knew and was came into me.  She becamse an empty cup.  A persistant vegatative state."  Her eyes grew a little wistful, distant.  "She's free of it.  But she certainly isn't alive in the most vital sense."

"I'm sorry," I said.

"I wouldn't know why.  I know my mother.  And all before her."  She put a finger to her temple.  "It's all in here."

The retconned origin story:
Quote from: SmF ch.46
"Normally, an Archive would have her own lifetime of experience to insulate her against all these other emotions and memories, a baseline to constrast against them."

I suddenly got it.  "But Ivy doesn't."

"Ivy doesn't," Luccio agreed.  "Her grandmother was killed in a freak accident, an automobile crash, I belive.  Her mother was a seventeen-year-old girl who was in love, and pregnant.  She hated her mother for dying and cursing her to carry the Archive when she wanted to have her own live-and she hated the child fo rhaving a lifetime of freedom ahead of her.  Ivy's mother killed herself rather than carry the Archive."

I started feeling a little sick.  "And Ivy knows it."

"She does.  Knows it, feels it.  She was born knowing exactly what her mother thought and felt about her."

"How could you know this about her..." I frowned, thinking.  Then said, "Kincaid.  The girl was in love with Kincaid."

"No," Luccio said.  "But Kincaid was working for Ivy's grandmother at the time, and the girl confided in him."

Here are some pertinant WoJ's on Ivy to throw in the mix.

Ivy (And Kincaid)
2009 Kansas City Q&A (http://www.archive.org/details/JimButcherTurnCoat) @51:20
Where did you get the idea for the Archive?
I knew I wanted to do "creepy little girl."  Because creepy little girls are a great character.  But then after I figured out what her powers were and how she would behave, I had to start working out the extended consequences of what that character would be like.  Originally she was supposed to be "creepy little girl, ok but why does she get any respect.  Ok she knows all this stuff, now she's creepy little girl who knows everything.  That's bad.  That's scary. 
But then she was another character that was only supposed to show up for one book, but wound up being interesting enough and having enough of a vibe with Harry and his latent father impulses to be worth showing up again and again.  So she's another one of those characters that sort of out grew what I originally cast her for.
2011 Marscon (http://www.jimbutcheronline.com/bb/index.php/topic,22558.msg1004817.html#msg1004817)
Uh, could Ivy…does the Archive read digital?  Or is it only print?
Does the archive read digital, or is it only print?  No, she gets it all. Uh, and…yeah, and nobody ever planned for the amount of information that has actually shown up in the past 20 years or so. Uh, so yeah, that’s not a good thing to be throwing on the…the little girl, don’t-have-any-insulation-against-everything-Archive. (Jim chuckles evilly) Like, totally bad timing for that, haha. Uh, I think Ivy would punch me in the nose too

[snip]Kincaid stuff[/snip]

Does Ivy know everything Bob knows?
Man, talk about an obscure question. Probably the vast majority of it, yeah, although Ivy's more oriented toward things that are happening on Earth, and Bob has sources all over. [messing with the microphone] So, I would say it's more an issue of, they have different fields of information available to them. They don't, like, have a comparable database.
So Ivy doesn't get what Bob gets as soon as Bob gets it?
No
Title: Re: Exploritory Reference: X compared to Y = possible Discrepancy?
Post by: knnn on June 22, 2012, 07:11:01 PM
- Harry's fifth floor office is on the fourth floor.
Needs expounding

Probably much dismissable (esp. since the building is toast), but may also be a clue toward a DB-GS world switch:

Storm Front:
Quote
I rarely use the elevator, even though I'm on the fifth floor.

Changes:
Quote
“The explosives are on the fourth floor,” Martin said calmly, “placed all around your office.”


- Kemmler takedown in '45 vs. '61
Hmmm, I don't know the details of this.  However Bob did say he was taken down multiple times, so the explenation must show that this doesn't explain it

It recently came up again:

GS Chapter 42:
Quote
Evil Bob had been the part of Bob the Skull, which had been in the service of this jerk named Kemmler, who had apparently been killed for good sometime during World War II.

DB Chapter 2:
Quote
"the White Council hunted him down and wiped out his dusty ass in 1961"

Quote
- 429B baker street (not sure if this counts as a discrepency).
huh?

Not really important, but the decor in Ronald's apartment is described as:

SK Chapter 11:
Quote
"imported from 429-B Baker Street."

Quote
- Confused denarian body count.
I would chalk this up to general confusion... meh, if someone thinks it's important than they should write it up :)
I actually had a post that did exactly this, but it was purged and I never backed it up  :-[.  I may recreate it.  The jist of it is that you need to either:

1) Assume that there were non-denarian goons at the Shedd.
2) Assume that the denarians brought "spare bodies" to the Shedd.

Quote
- Minor practitioner body-count in WN (AKA "the Skavis only got 1").
Not familar with it

I may write it up again, but it's the same concept -- if you take the total amount of practitioners killed or missing in Chicago and you subtract the ones Thomas saved and the ones obviously killed by Madrigal/Vitto, you pretty much come up empty.  Not that important.

Title: Re: Exploritory Reference: X compared to Y = possible Discrepancy?
Post by: Serack on June 22, 2012, 07:37:59 PM
Is "imported from 429-B Baker Street."

Supposed to be a Sherlock Holmes reference (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/221B_Baker_Street)?

If so, you might have hosed your correction a little, since apparently it was 221B Baker Street (using googlefoo)
Title: Re: Exploritory Reference: X compared to Y = possible Discrepancy?
Post by: Mr. Death on June 22, 2012, 07:48:01 PM
The fourth/fifth floor may be an American/Foreign discrepancy. In much of the world, what Americans call the first floor is the ground floor, the second floor is called the first floor, etc., if I'm not mistaken. So what Harry might call the fifth floor, someone from Europe or South America might instinctively call it the fourth.
Title: Re: Exploritory Reference: X compared to Y = possible Discrepancy?
Post by: knnn on June 22, 2012, 07:52:42 PM
Is "imported from 429-B Baker Street."

Supposed to be a Sherlock Holmes reference (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/221B_Baker_Street)?

If so, you might have hosed your correction a little, since apparently it was 221B Baker Street (using googlefoo)

Exactly!  so the fact that Harry says 429-B is either a clue, a typo, or whatnot.

Edit:  Oh, you meant that my correction was mistaken.  Actually, it's the quote that was wrong.  Fixed it.
Title: Re: Exploritory Reference: X compared to Y = possible Discrepancy?
Post by: laura118b on June 22, 2012, 07:55:32 PM
Molly's age can be explained by the fact that some of the early books got published in a different order than written.  Priscellie covered this at one time IIRC.
Title: Re: Exploritory Reference: X compared to Y = possible Discrepancy?
Post by: knnn on June 22, 2012, 07:57:11 PM
Molly's age can be explained by the fact that some of the early books got published in a different order than written.  Priscellie covered this at one time IIRC.

Yeah, I believe it's covered somewhere in the timeline thread.
Title: Re: Exploritory Reference: X compared to Y = possible Discrepancy?
Post by: Ms Duck on June 23, 2012, 04:24:38 AM

The in book explanation fo how kemller's ritual works vs the woj description came up recently.

Title: Re: Exploritory Reference: X compared to Y = possible Discrepancy?
Post by: KurtinStGeorge on June 23, 2012, 06:20:40 AM
In Dead Beat, Li Xian drives "an old Chrysler" at the Wardens and the children they were protecting from the undead.  Then Harry has Sue leap on the car, "Sue landed one clawed foot on the street, and the other came down squarely on the Caddy's hood..."

Mopar fans and Cadillac enthusiasts (I used to own a 59 Coupe de Ville myself) were not amused by the mixing up of Chrysler and GM cars.   
Title: Re: Exploritory Reference: X compared to Y = possible Discrepancy?
Post by: Shecky on June 23, 2012, 12:38:16 PM
Can't say more than this, but I will say two things:

1) Some measurements are given from Harry's perspective - i.e., an estimate.
2) Some things are, bluntly put, deliberately not as they seem, but the agency has not been revealed.

But overall, HELLUVA thread and compilation of issues. Well done, you guys.
Title: Re: Exploritory Reference: X compared to Y = possible Discrepancy?
Post by: Cruness on June 25, 2012, 02:56:17 PM
Here is a possibility.

SK: Elaine says that Justin got to her the day she stayed home sick from school, which she says is about 2 weeks before Justin sends "That Demon" (HWWB) after Harry.

GS
(click to show/hide)

What do you all think?
Title: Re: Exploritory Reference: X compared to Y = possible Discrepancy?
Post by: Paladino on June 25, 2012, 08:27:06 PM
Here is a possibility.

SK: Elaine says that Justin got to her the day she stayed home sick from school, which she says is about 2 weeks before Justin sends "That Demon" (HWWB) after Harry.

GS
(click to show/hide)

What do you all think?

I'd say that she stayed home sick at two ocasions. First as 2 weeks before HWWB, when she was really sick, and justin used this chance to enthrall her. And then 2 weeks after, when Justin was sure of his hold on her (she mentions in SK that after a time she stopped fighting), he had her pretend to be sick, so she could help him prepare Harry enthralling, once Harry is stronger and a lot more stuborn than Elaine, and this is when Harry come earlier.

Well, this is at least how, assuming that she is not lying, confused or someone time traveled to change it, I read this situation. It explains hwo she was not lying, and it works with Harry memory. Of course, she could also be evil and be lying to Harry.. I just don't think so personally.
Title: Re: Exploritory Reference: X compared to Y = possible Discrepancy?
Post by: Ziggelly on June 25, 2012, 08:46:14 PM
There's also the fact that he says, in SK, that:
Quote from: Summer Knight (Ch. 7)
"Elaine. We were … both of us were orphans. We got adopted by the same man when we were ten."
This was actually a pretty well-accepted fact, in my head, through the series. So there might be other references to it later on, but I wasn't able to find them anywhere.
And, yet, in GS he says:
Quote from: Ghost Story (Ch. 30)
I hadn’t really been interested in girls yet when I met Elaine. We’d both been twelve...
And, also, he's twelve in the Justin flashback later on, when he's doing a magic spell for the first time:
Quote from: Ghost Story (Ch. 20)
I built up the spell again, slowly, slowly, focusing on it more intently than on anything I’d ever done in my life. And I was nearly thirteen, so that was really saying something.
Plus, there's:
Quote from: WoJ
How old were Eb and Maggie Sr when they first manifested a talent?
Same age as Harry–around 12 or 13.

So that makes two potential backstory weirdness things in Summer Knight. If it had been the first or second book, I wouldn't have even blinked at this, really, but by the fourth he probably would've had at least the major details of Harry's backstory ironed out, especially since he was bringing Elaine back in that book, wouldn't you think?
Title: Re: Exploritory Reference: X compared to Y = possible Discrepancy?
Post by: Lind on June 25, 2012, 08:51:16 PM
Don't have the books in front of me but I am pretty sure that when Harry shot Corpsetaker/Lucio's body in Dead Beat it was to her face while the description of the event in Proven Guilty was Harry shooting her in the back of the head.
Title: Re: Exploritory Reference: X compared to Y = possible Discrepancy?
Post by: mdodd on June 25, 2012, 11:35:21 PM
Don't have the books in front of me but I am pretty sure that when Harry shot Corpsetaker/Lucio's body in Dead Beat it was to her face while the description of the event in Proven Guilty was Harry shooting her in the back of the head.
I am just re-reading DB and Harry says he shot her underneath her cheekbone and she didn't have time to release her Death Curse (then Morgan goes into beast mode and tries to change the number of limbs and heads on Harry's body).

I don't have access to PG.
Title: Re: Exploritory Reference: X compared to Y = possible Discrepancy?
Post by: Ziggelly on June 26, 2012, 01:48:54 AM
SK Chapter 11:I actually had a post that did exactly this, but it was purged and I never backed it up  :-[.  I may recreate it.  The jist of it is that you need to either:

1) Assume that there were non-denarian goons at the Shedd.
2) Assume that the denarians brought "spare bodies" to the Shedd.
*Shrug.* I'll do it.
Twelve bodies. Eleven coins. The rest of the scene completely ignores the coin that Ivy stamped her foot on after she turned it to ash (Harry just picks her up and runs, leaving it there, I guess), though, so it's not unlikely that Jim forgot about it, or didn't add that little part in until later. For argument's sake, I guess the drowned body might just have been a minion... because, really, how likely is it that one of the uber-tough-and-durable Denarians would be drowned to death? Seriously.

There would need to have only been eleven to make the coin number add up to thirty, so we know there's not an unaccounted for one:
+9 (There were nine coins with the church before Death Masks)
+4 (Ursiel, Saluriel, Lasciel, and Akariel)
+11 (killed at the aquarium)
+6 (on Demonreach: Deirdre, Rosanna, Tessa, Nick, Thorned Namshiel, and Magog)
... Unless one of the SmF Denarians got one of the coins safely in storage?
Meh. I dunno. It's probably not important, at any rate.

- Minor practitioner body-count in WN (AKA "the Skavis only got 1").
Not familar with it
There was  a detailed thread on it  (http://www.jimbutcheronline.com/bb/index.php/topic,32858.0.html) a couple of days ago, specifically for you. ;D
Title: Re: Exploritory Reference: X compared to Y = possible Discrepancy?
Post by: Serack on June 26, 2012, 02:09:01 AM
Ziggelly, you mind putting the kemmler stuff in a separate post so I can link to it on it's own?
Title: Re: Exploritory Reference: X compared to Y = possible Discrepancy?
Post by: Ziggelly on June 26, 2012, 02:12:00 AM
Certainly. Kemmler stuff, take two:
Quote from: DB
"He was best known for World War One... There were about a hundred and fifty years of engineering built into it, and he had his fingers into all kinds of pies. He vanished at the end of hostilities and didn't show up again until he started animating mass graves during
World War Two. Went on rampages out in Eastern Europe, where things were pretty much a nightmare even without his help. Nobody is sure how many people he killed... After what the guy did, the White Council hunted him down and wiped his dusty ass out in 1961... They killed him pretty good. A bunch of times. He'd shown up again after the Wardens had killed him early in the nineteenth century, so they were real careful the second time. And good riddance to the psychotic bastard."

Quote from: GS
Kemmler had fought the entire White Council in an all-out war. Twice. They killed him seven times over the course of both wars, but it didn’t take until number seven... [he] had apparently been killed for good sometime during World War II.

Those two accounts seem fairly different, don't you think? I mean, I wouldn't consider 1961 as being even close to "during" WW2, as has been pointed out. Also, the first quote seems to imply that he only came back from the dead once, and that they only tried to kill him twice, while the second explicitly says that it was seven times. Plus, I mean... WW1 and 2 would probably be more considered wars against general humanity, rather than just the Council, right? ???
The last one's probably me nitpicking the text to death. But whatever. I thought I'd include it anyway.
Title: Re: Exploritory Reference: X compared to Y = possible Discrepancy?
Post by: knnn on June 26, 2012, 03:18:30 AM
*Shrug.* I'll do it.
  • Urumviel (who is killed by Harry)
  • One that Kincaid kills - Varthiel/Ordiel/McKullen (1/5)
  • Another one that Kincaid kills- Varthiel/Ordiel/McKullen (2/5)
  • Another Kincaid kill - Varthiel/Ordiel/McKullen (3/5)
  • One that Ivy took care of
  • Shaggy-Feathers one that Kincaid kills (4/5)
  • Obsidian statue one that Kincaid kills (5/5)
  • One that Luccio killed (1/2)
  • One that Luccio killed (2/2)
  • One that Michael/Sanya killed (1/2)
  • One that Michael/Sanya killed (2/2)
  • Random drowned Denarian
Twelve bodies. Eleven coins. The rest of the scene completely ignores the coin that Ivy stamped her foot on after she turned it to ash (Harry just picks her up and runs, leaving it there, I guess), though, so it's not unlikely that Jim forgot about it, or didn't add that little part in until later. For argument's sake, I guess the drowned body might just have been a minion... because, really, how likely is it that one of the uber-tough-and-durable Denarians would be drowned to death? Seriously.

Thanks!

As I recall, the issue is even worse if you assume that first guys Kincaid snipes (on screen) are not Varthiel/Ordiel/McKullen.  The bodies are right there in front of Tessa, so it seems weird they'd feel the need to point it out.

Also, there's the revealing "Varthiel and Ordiel are down and McKullen is dead".   Either McKullen is a "dangerous denarian" (hence using the host name), or that's the name of the goon.

Finally, there's that weird thing about Michael knowing a-priori how many denarians are dead, despite the fact he has the wrong number of bodies and coins.  I suppose you could explain that one using "the boss said so".

There was a detailed thread on it a couple of days ago, specifically for you.

That was me.  Thanks for linking it.
Title: Re: Exploritory Reference: X compared to Y = possible Discrepancy?
Post by: Ziggelly on June 26, 2012, 06:06:57 AM
Thanks!

As I recall, the issue is even worse if you assume that first guys Kincaid snipes (on screen) are not Varthiel/Ordiel/McKullen.  The bodies are right there in front of Tessa, so it seems weird they'd feel the need to point it out.

Also, there's the revealing "Varthiel and Ordiel are down and McKullen is dead".   Either McKullen is a "dangerous denarian" (hence using the host name), or that's the name of the goon.

Finally, there's that weird thing about Michael knowing a-priori how many denarians are dead, despite the fact he has the wrong number of bodies and coins.  I suppose you could explain that one using "the boss said so".
Oh, wow.
I didn't even look at the part of the scene where Harry adds the coin from the drowned guy and one of the Kincaid-killed-them guys, without altering the final coin-count at all.
Yeah, I'm not trying to rationalize this anymore. I'm just going to with my good friend Occam, throw my hands up in the air, and ask the Mighty Jim why he does this to me.  ::)
He's so... not detail-oriented. It makes everything so stressful for those of us who make lists and are kinda OCD and tend to over-analyze wayyy too much. It's almost like he's just focusing on the story and plot and characters and silly things like that rather than the miniscule details that almost nobody actually ever catches until read-throughs or even really care about anyway because in all probability they completely lack any actual relevence.
*Sigh.*
Title: Re: Exploritory Reference: X compared to Y = possible Discrepancy?
Post by: knnn on June 26, 2012, 11:47:24 AM
I didn't even look at the part of the scene where Harry adds the coin from the drowned guy and one of the Kincaid-killed-them guys, without altering the final coin-count at all.

 :)

I don't know if I'd go as far as saying it's as bad as that.  Remember that the Denarians are specifically the guys Michael was designed to fight, so it's possible he either "sensed" their numbers before the fight (though this would beg the question of why he didn't warn Harry he was walking into a trap), or possibly he got divine info about number of denarian casualties after the battle.  It's not that far fetched; remember that he asks about Kincaid (knowing if Kincaid will survive seems less "mission oriented" than knowing how much of the opposition has been disabled). 

Still, I agree with you that there is a possible difficulty in the text.  That's the reason I brought it up for the discrepancy list in the first place.
Title: Re: Exploritory Reference: X compared to Y = possible Discrepancy?
Post by: ImpishMortal on June 26, 2012, 07:02:59 PM
Oh, wow.
I didn't even look at the part of the scene where Harry adds the coin from the drowned guy and one of the Kincaid-killed-them guys, without altering the final coin-count at all.
Yeah, I'm not trying to rationalize this anymore. I'm just going to with my good friend Occam, throw my hands up in the air, and ask the Mighty Jim why he does this to me.  ::)
He's so... not detail-oriented. It makes everything so stressful for those of us who make lists and are kinda OCD and tend to over-analyze wayyy too much. It's almost like he's just focusing on the story and plot and characters and silly things like that rather than the miniscule details that almost nobody actually ever catches until read-throughs or even really care about anyway because in all probability they completely lack any actual relevence.
*Sigh.*

I feel you Ziggelly. It makes me paranoid to even try to come up with theories that may be plausible depending solely on whether or not a piece of info is an actual goof or an intentional discrepancy. Thus, Jim sows his tales as we reap epileptic trees. :P
Title: Re: Exploritory Reference: X compared to Y = possible Discrepancy?
Post by: Duke Blue on June 26, 2012, 07:11:44 PM
I don't know if this is a discrepancy or I just missed something but the talk of weird counting made me think of it so I thought I would bring it up.

In Dead Beat, when Mort does the red ink trick to show where necromancy has been used around the city, Harry clearly lists out seven locations.  Then both Mort and Harry say "six" (Harry then concludes that there are six Necromancers in town which I didn't get either but probably is a side issue).  Why did both Mort and Harry say six when there when seven locations were just pointed out on the map?  As I said, I don't know if it is a discrepancy or if I am just missing something but if I am just missing something please tell me because it is bugging the heck out of me.
Title: Re: Exploritory Reference: X compared to Y = possible Discrepancy?
Post by: Paladino on June 26, 2012, 07:59:20 PM
I don't know if this is a discrepancy or I just missed something but the talk of weird counting made me think of it so I thought I would bring it up.

In Dead Beat, when Mort does the red ink trick to show where necromancy has been used around the city, Harry clearly lists out seven locations.  Then both Mort and Harry say "six" (Harry then concludes that there are six Necromancers in town which I didn't get either but probably is a side issue).  Why did both Mort and Harry say six when there when seven locations were just pointed out on the map?  As I said, I don't know if it is a discrepancy or if I am just missing something but if I am just missing something please tell me because it is bugging the heck out of me.

Don't remember right now, but one of the locations was the greaveyard wasn't it? That would be Mavra. It explains Harry saying six, but not Morty..
Title: Re: Exploritory Reference: X compared to Y = possible Discrepancy?
Post by: Ziggelly on June 26, 2012, 11:52:41 PM
Quote from: DB
I put my finger beside one of the larger red circles. "This is the Forensic Institute. One of them created a zombie there earlier tonight."
Mort sat up and leaned forward over the map, his eyes glazed with fatigue. He pointed at another bloody dot. "That one. It's the Field Museum."
I traced my finger to another one. "This one is in a pretty tough neighborhood. I think it's an apartment building." I moved on to the next. "A cemetery. And what the hell, at O'Hare?"
Mort shook his head. "The ink's darker than the others. I think that means it's beneath the airport, in Undertown."
"Uh-huh," I said. "That makes sense. Two more. An alley down by Burnham Park, and a sidewalk on Wacker."
"Six," Mort said.
"Six," I agreed.
Yeah, I'd say that the cemetery one is Mavra. But there's no reason for them to get a count of six when there are seven places.

Title: Re: Exploritory Reference: X compared to Y = possible Discrepancy?
Post by: Duke Blue on June 27, 2012, 12:20:00 AM
It's also interesting because this meeting in DB is also where the Mort's haircut discrepancies arose that Serack mentioned earlier.  I bet someone could turn this into an awesome conspiracy theory.
Title: Re: Exploritory Reference: X compared to Y = possible Discrepancy?
Post by: the neurovore of Zur-En-Aargh on June 27, 2012, 01:31:29 AM
It's also interesting because this meeting in DB is also where the Mort's haircut discrepancies arose that Serack mentioned earlier.  I bet someone could turn this into an awesome conspiracy theory.

I've proposed that there were three other necromancers running around in DB who didn't show up because time-travelling future Harry disposed of them (and had to do so once he found out they were there in order to make sure history happened the way he remembered it), if that counts.
Title: Re: Exploritory Reference: X compared to Y = possible Discrepancy?
Post by: Eleyctra on June 27, 2012, 03:56:53 AM
Oh good, a discrepancy theory thread. I've been sitting on one for a while now that I didn't want to spend all on one thread post. It was pointed out to me by my IT Director at work (whom I have converted among many over to the Dresden Files  ;)), and he caught it in his first read-through. In my read-through to write this I found another discrepancy (I'll list it after).

In Storm Front, Harry is apparently living in a time warp. (Most likely a typo.)
-Wednesday night, Victor Sells (AKA The Shadowman) uses a ritual curse to kill Jennifer Stanton and Tommy Tomm.
-Bunch of investigating Thursday thru Saturday...
-Late Saturday night, the demon frog attacks and Linda Randall is dead. Harry is called into the scene a short few hours later.
-After leaving the crime scene Harry takes a walk and gets attacked by Gimpy Lawrence and loses some hair. But on Ch16, page 207, "I sort of sagged when he stopped hitting me, and he threw me to the ground. We were at a well-lit gas station, just before midnight on a Friday night, and anything he did was in full view of any cars going by."
-Later in Ch18, Harry walks out of a ruined Varsity after confronting Marcone, "So I walked. It was pretty stupid, in retrospect, walking around Chicago late on a Saturday night."


The other thing I caught on the re-through:
Ch17 page 214-215, "Then I walked back into the parking lot to consider exactly what I had at my disposal. A bracelet on each wrist. A ring. My blasting rod. My staff."

No Mother's amulet? This is the only time in the book and series he has two shield bracelets. Maybe he needed the extra foci at such an early stage in his career?
Title: Re: Exploritory Reference: X compared to Y = possible Discrepancy?
Post by: Duke Blue on June 27, 2012, 05:06:24 AM
I've proposed that there were three other necromancers running around in DB who didn't show up because time-travelling future Harry disposed of them (and had to do so once he found out they were there in order to make sure history happened the way he remembered it), if that counts.

Your theory doesn't seem to address the ink spot or Mort's haircut.  However, if you work in a DeLorean then I think we can accept it.
Title: Re: Exploritory Reference: X compared to Y = possible Discrepancy?
Post by: Serack on June 27, 2012, 10:51:09 AM
Oh good, a discrepancy theory thread. I've been sitting on one for a while now that I didn't want to spend all on one thread post. It was pointed out to me by my IT Director at work (whom I have converted among many over to the Dresden Files  ;)), and he caught it in his first read-through. In my read-through to write this I found another discrepancy (I'll list it after).

In Storm Front, Harry is apparently living in a time warp. (Most likely a typo.)
-Wednesday night, Victor Sells (AKA The Shadowman) uses a ritual curse to kill Jennifer Stanton and Tommy Tomm.
-Bunch of investigating Thursday thru Saturday...
-Late Saturday night, the demon frog attacks and Linda Randall is dead. Harry is called into the scene a short few hours later.
-After leaving the crime scene Harry takes a walk and gets attacked by Gimpy Lawrence and loses some hair. But on Ch16, page 207, "I sort of sagged when he stopped hitting me, and he threw me to the ground. We were at a well-lit gas station, just before midnight on a Friday night, and anything he did was in full view of any cars going by."
-Later in Ch18, Harry walks out of a ruined Varsity after confronting Marcone, "So I walked. It was pretty stupid, in retrospect, walking around Chicago late on a Saturday night."

Sounds like he goofed a little.  He was working several jobs, going to graduate school and helping with his young son when he wrote the first 3 books.  (all without getting a dime for them)

The other thing I caught on the re-through:
Ch17 page 214-215, "Then I walked back into the parking lot to consider exactly what I had at my disposal. A bracelet on each wrist. A ring. My blasting rod. My staff."

No Mother's amulet? This is the only time in the book and series he has two shield bracelets. Maybe he needed the extra foci at such an early stage in his career?

Interestingly enough, Harry used the end of his staff as a light source in SF instead of his amulet.  I think it was when the toad demon attacked and he retreated to his lab.  If I remember rightly though, the mysterious woman's hand brought his hand up to the amulet near the end of the book though.
Title: Re: Exploritory Reference: X compared to Y = possible Discrepancy?
Post by: ImpishMortal on June 27, 2012, 10:58:25 AM
Here's a possible solution worth considering about the location discrepancy of Harry's office that Knnn pointed out: the bombs were placed beneath Harry's office. This would still satisfy them being "around" his office if they placed them for the entire length and breadth pointing up.

Also, I feel like there is something off with the events concerning Lydia in GP, but I can't determine what that is.
Title: Re: Exploritory Reference: X compared to Y = possible Discrepancy?
Post by: Silkki on June 27, 2012, 11:15:38 AM
Yeah, I'd say that the cemetery one is Mavra. But there's no reason for them to get a count of six when there are seven places.

One of the places is the forensic institute and Harry knew there was no necromancer there any longer. So counting that location as an apprentice would have been kinda foolish. If Harry had done necromany in the morning in his laboratory and it had lighted up as a spot, he still wouldn't have counted it as one extra necromancer.
Title: Re: Exploritory Reference: X compared to Y = possible Discrepancy?
Post by: the neurovore of Zur-En-Aargh on June 27, 2012, 01:03:43 PM
One of the places is the forensic institute and Harry knew there was no necromancer there any longer.

How exactly can Harry rule out a different necromancer going there since he left ?
Title: Re: Exploritory Reference: X compared to Y = possible Discrepancy?
Post by: ImpishMortal on June 27, 2012, 01:11:47 PM
How exactly can Harry rule out a different necromancer going there since he left ?

Maybe he can't, but why would another go there and also use necromancy?
Title: Re: Exploritory Reference: X compared to Y = possible Discrepancy?
Post by: the neurovore of Zur-En-Aargh on June 27, 2012, 01:19:08 PM
Maybe he can't, but why would another go there and also use necromancy?

We don't have a reason for why this might be the case, we just have ambiguous evidence that does not rule it out.
Title: Re: Exploritory Reference: X compared to Y = possible Discrepancy?
Post by: Serack on June 27, 2012, 01:24:26 PM
Honestly, I always thought that method of IDing the # of necromancers was shoddy.  I think too much emphasis was put on it in the blurb, and never really thought it was worth this much discussion.
Title: Re: Exploritory Reference: X compared to Y = possible Discrepancy?
Post by: Duke Blue on June 27, 2012, 02:34:05 PM
Honestly, I always thought that method of IDing the # of necromancers was shoddy.  I think too much emphasis was put on it in the blurb, and never really thought it was worth this much discussion.

You're probably right.  The main reason I always found that part interesting is because given that Jim is not one for extraneous details, you have to figure that he mapped out exactly what each of those necromancers did at each of those locations and had a reason for all of them.  Not to mention Lasciel's shadow screwing around with Harry's head the whole book induces a certain amount of paranoia.  I have never been able to shake the feeling that something weird was going on in Dead Beat which Harry wasn't catching on to.  Of course I get that feeling about most of the books.   ;D
Title: Re: Exploritory Reference: X compared to Y = possible Discrepancy?
Post by: the neurovore of Zur-En-Aargh on June 27, 2012, 03:20:32 PM
Honestly, I always thought that method of IDing the # of necromancers was shoddy.  I think too much emphasis was put on it in the blurb, and never really thought it was worth this much discussion.

I kind of figured part of the point of getting the specifics of the method there was as an inspiration of Little Chicago, fwiw.
Title: Re: Exploritory Reference: X compared to Y = possible Discrepancy?
Post by: knnn on June 27, 2012, 06:12:34 PM
Here's a possible solution worth considering about the location discrepancy of Harry's office that Knnn pointed out: the bombs were placed beneath Harry's office. This would still satisfy them being "around" his office if they placed them for the entire length and breadth pointing up.

It also says that the Rampire offices were on the ninth floor - five floors above Harry's office.
Title: Re: Exploritory Reference: X compared to Y = possible Discrepancy?
Post by: Serack on June 27, 2012, 06:27:17 PM
Here's a possible solution worth considering about the location discrepancy of Harry's office that Knnn pointed out: the bombs were placed beneath Harry's office. This would still satisfy them being "around" his office if they placed them for the entire length and breadth pointing up.

Also, I feel like there is something off with the events concerning Lydia in GP, but I can't determine what that is.
It also says that the Rampire offices were on the ninth floor - five floors above Harry's office.

Harry also said that they actually did the work in his office claiming it was something about asbestos removal or something.
Title: Re: Exploritory Reference: X compared to Y = possible Discrepancy?
Post by: knnn on June 27, 2012, 06:34:07 PM
Oh, and another possible discrepancy:

Grave Peril pg 200:
Quote
"white for protection"

Proven Guity pg 155:
Quote
"blue for defense"
..."white for purity"

Title: Re: Exploritory Reference: X compared to Y = possible Discrepancy?
Post by: Serack on June 27, 2012, 07:07:40 PM
Just because in normal use Red could mean Stop or it could mean Hot does not mean that the different usages are disparate.

Same with Harry's usage of what white symbolizes.  Especially since he already seemed to equate which color was cheaper at wal-mart to be equally significant.
Title: Re: Exploritory Reference: X compared to Y = possible Discrepancy?
Post by: Mr. Death on June 27, 2012, 07:13:43 PM
Also, remember the other reason Harry said he was using blue in PG: It was the cheapest color at WalMart.
Title: Re: Exploritory Reference: X compared to Y = possible Discrepancy?
Post by: Serack on July 02, 2012, 06:59:04 PM
I just remembered something.  I think in Storm Front (maybe it was a different early book) Harry said he started manifesting his powers and was adopted by Justin at the age of 10, but in the later books it was stated to be about when he was 12 or 13.  I'll have to fill in with book references later, but I wanted to pen it down while it's on my mind.
Title: Re: Exploritory Reference: X compared to Y = possible Discrepancy?
Post by: Ziggelly on July 02, 2012, 10:01:06 PM
I already said that on page 2-ish. :P
Title: Re: Exploritory Reference: X compared to Y = possible Discrepancy?
Post by: Serack on July 02, 2012, 11:14:45 PM
I already said that on page 2-ish. :P

bah.

Did you just add all those quotes? 

Could you add Ch 7 to the SK quote, ch 30 to the first GS quote, and ch 20 to the last GS quote?

Oh, and your post has been linked to in the OP now :)
Title: Re: Exploritory Reference: X compared to Y = possible Discrepancy?
Post by: Serack on July 02, 2012, 11:25:29 PM
Molly Aged more than can be accounted for between books 8 and 9 (Proven Guilty and White Night)

Per the "Timeline Chick"
We haven't quite pinned down specifically what years these events take place, so let's say "Storm Front" and "Fool Moon" take place in the year 0, and every thing else is either BSF (Before Storm Front) or ASF (After Storm Front). 

[/snip]

12 BSF: Molly Carpenter is born, according to WN and beyond.  She's suddenly a year too old in WN, and the change is kept consistent for the subsequent stories.

(11 BSF: Molly Carpenter is born, according to DM and PG.  She's suddenly a year too old in WN, and the change is kept consistent for the subsequent stories.)

Here are the relevant book quotes:
Quote from: PG ch. 7
"You're sixteen"
"Seventeen," she said, with sparks of indignation and another thick "s."
"Whatever," I said.  "You're a juvenile.  You should call your parents."

Quote from: WN ch. 30
I stripped the glove off and held it up, in my fingers spread.  It didn't look as horrific as it used to, but it was plenty ugly enough to make an impression on a nineteen-year-old girl.  "This isn't a goddamn movie, Molly.

Molly's age can be explained by the fact that some of the early books got published in a different order than written.  Priscellie covered this at one time IIRC.

With that note, I'll put in a Doylist explanation of that "Discrepancy."

According to the following WoJ, the order for DB and PG got switched from their planned sequence.  Since the discrepancy circles around how much time passed between PG and WN with respect to Molly's age, it can be assumed that for the overall plot, Molly was supposed to be Harry's apprentice for a few years WN.

Quote
You planned out the 20 books and apocalyptic trilogy for the books and how much have you changed now that you have gotten into it?
Not a lot.  I changed around the events of Proven Guilty and Dead Beat because Proven Guilty, the part with Molly was originally going to come first and I told my editor, "This one is going to be a little quieter, a little bit more personal than the one before, it's going to be focusing a little bit more on just a couple of people and stuff that's important to Harry." and my editor says, "well, you know, that might not be a good idea for this one." And I'm like "What?"  "You might want to have a story that's a little bit bigger"  "What?"  "You might want to have a story that's a little bit broader and thicker.  Something that people can really get their teeth into.  Something that's going to be a little heavier and have more weight."  I'm like "Wait a minute are you saying I'm going into hard cover?"  She's like "That's not what I'm saying... I didn't say that!"  Cause it was a surprise for me I suppose.  So then I said, "Ok we've gotta go with zombies and ghosts and animated T-Rex for that one then."

Edit:  I'll note here that when Priscellie confronted Jim about this at a signing, he recruited her to be a Beta.  Something similar happened to Terri Bane when she punched Jim's shoulder at an interview for letting Harry not check up on Mouse's shoulder after the dust settled during White Night.
Title: Re: Exploritory Reference: X compared to Y = possible Discrepancy?
Post by: knnn on July 02, 2012, 11:44:47 PM
Another possible discrepancy is that in Storm Front, Harry feels hopeless because someone got a piece of his hair, yet in Changes, Binder simply shaves his head and dips in the lake, removing all chances of Harry tracking him.

One can get around this by saying that in SF the spell was powered by a lightning storm so maybe that had the ability to target better?
Title: Re: Exploritory Reference: X compared to Y = possible Discrepancy?
Post by: Serack on July 02, 2012, 11:53:27 PM
Another possible discrepancy is that in Storm Front, Harry feels hopeless because someone got a piece of his hair, yet in Changes, Binder simply shaves his head and dips in the lake, removing all chances of Harry tracking him.

One can get around this by saying that in SF the spell was powered by a lightning storm so maybe that had the ability to target better?

Meh, the magical system was still getting fleshed out.    I always felt that mechanization for convincing Binder he had lost his tail was a rather unimpressive plot point for the reasons you just pointed out, as well as every other time old hair was used.  I would rather lump that with any other instances of the explanations of how the magic in the series has morphed minutely as the series progressed.
Title: Re: Exploritory Reference: X compared to Y = possible Discrepancy?
Post by: Eleyctra on July 02, 2012, 11:56:31 PM
Or he could say he learned a little more after Storm Front from Bob about the rules surrounding hair connections...you know, while writes down his case files after every book. ;)
Title: Re: Exploritory Reference: X compared to Y = possible Discrepancy?
Post by: Serack on July 03, 2012, 12:04:19 AM
Or he could say he learned a little more after Storm Front from Bob about the rules surrounding hair connections...you know, while writes down his case files after every book. ;)

This does a better job of following the spirit of this point in my OP than I was capable of while in the mindset of coming up with arguments

In the spirit of respect for Jim, and his fans, if you contribute to this reference, please try to do so in a manor that does just that, and that acknoledges that Jim has been able to do a great job of finding creative, cohesive ways to get such discrepancies to work quite well within the world he has created.

Thanks for doing such a great job of keeping our pontificating grounded.  ;D
Title: Re: Exploritory Reference: X compared to Y = possible Discrepancy?
Post by: Serack on July 03, 2012, 12:08:28 AM
Change in the details of Lasciel's Prison between when it was made in DM and a description of it in PG:

Quote from: DM ch. 33
"I dropped the coin into the hole. I slipped a steel ring about three inches across around it. I muttered to myself and willed
energy into the ring. The whispering abruptly cut off.
I dumped two buckets of cement into the hole and smoothed it until it was level with the rest of my floor. After that, I
hurried out of the lab and shut the door behind me."

Quote from: PG ch 6
Underneath it lay a foot and a half or so of concrete, and then another heavy metal box, wrapped with its own little circle of wards and spells.  Inside the box was a blackened silver coin.

It is possible that Harry dug up the coin with the purpose of reinforcing the prison, but the narration makes me think that he had left it alone ever since he first made it.
Title: Re: Exploritory Reference: X compared to Y = possible Discrepancy?
Post by: Ziggelly on July 03, 2012, 12:57:52 AM
bah.

Did you just add all those quotes? 

Could you add Ch 7 to the SK quote, ch 30 to the first GS quote, and ch 20 to the last GS quote?

Oh, and your post has been linked to in the OP now :)
Done. I even found that WoJ I mentioned.
Title: Re: Exploritory Reference: X compared to Y = possible Discrepancy?
Post by: Eleyctra on July 03, 2012, 03:57:08 AM
This does a better job of following the spirit of this point in my OP than I was capable of while in the mindset of coming up with arguments

Thanks for doing such a great job of keeping our pontificating grounded.  ;D

I do have trouble catching up at first often times, so I always try my best to stay within the rules  8)
Title: Re: Exploritory Reference: X compared to Y = possible Discrepancy?
Post by: Serack on July 10, 2012, 02:58:57 PM
I was re-reading my copy of Dead Beat (Paperback) and on page 403, where Ramirez is telling Harry why he thought to Soulgaze Luccio, his name suddenly changes to Rodriguez... 

This happens in chapter 41.  It's page 376 on my nook.
Title: Re: Exploritory Reference: X compared to Y = possible Discrepancy?
Post by: taishojojo on July 10, 2012, 10:24:41 PM
Change in the details of Lasciel's Prison between when it was made in DM and a description of it in PG:

It is possible that Harry dug up the coin with the purpose of reinforcing the prison, but the narration makes me think that he had left it alone ever since he first made it.
I cant help but notice that others have failed to notice that pouring concrete onto the activated ring encased coin should have broken the circle.
unless its been mentioned....
Title: Re: Exploritory Reference: X compared to Y = possible Discrepancy?
Post by: ImpishMortal on July 11, 2012, 01:39:35 PM
I cant help but notice that others have failed to notice that pouring concrete onto the activated ring encased coin should have broken the circle.
unless its been mentioned....

I saw it more like he dug a hole within the already placed circle, tossed in Lasciel, filled the hole, activated the circle, and then left it there. IIRC, he never mentions using the circle in his basement post-burying the coin.
Title: Re: Exploritory Reference: X compared to Y = possible Discrepancy?
Post by: Serack on July 11, 2012, 02:04:00 PM
I cant help but notice that others have failed to notice that pouring concrete onto the activated ring encased coin should have broken the circle.
unless its been mentioned....

Lol.  Most of the info from my post on that comes from a topic discussing exactly that.  Gime a min and I'll find it.
Title: Re: Exploritory Reference: X compared to Y = possible Discrepancy?
Post by: Serack on July 11, 2012, 02:06:10 PM
here it is.

http://www.jimbutcheronline.com/bb/index.php/topic,31428.0.html

P.S.  I'll probably be moving this topic to the reference child board soon.
Title: Re: Exploritory Reference: X compared to Y = possible Discrepancy?
Post by: taishojojo on July 11, 2012, 03:11:52 PM
but that thread began meandering around page 2/3...
I do see that the issue has come up.

I'm curious when Harry will use... 'superior' (maybe a bad choice of words) geometry. or more better geometry  8)
WoJ has discussed how mages dont really gain more power as much as they get more efficient in its use.
Harry wastes a lot of energy... making a circle is simple. but a circle makes a cylinder. What if Harry began using spheres?
I'm thinking over-circle kinda thing. Or begins using over-spheres.. extending into dimensions perpendicular to {x,y,z}. forward/backward in time... alternate universes/timelines... the NN...

Sorry if I'm not making any sense... I have Flatland on the brain. (excellent book btw... highly recommend it)
Title: Re: Exploritory Reference: X compared to Y = possible Discrepancy?
Post by: knnn on July 11, 2012, 03:19:03 PM
There was a thread a while back about "how high up do circles go"?  Note that everyone we see (e.g. Kincaid, Butters) all seem to create the same type of cylinder, so it is not obvious what "physical law" is causing this or how the height of the cylinder is chosen.  Maybe everyone in the DV has seen Star Trek transporter beams?


...or better yet, in the DV Gene Roddenberry was actually on to something (like Stoker/Lovecraft).  Remember that WoJ is that an upcoming book named "Mirror Mirror" is a strong possibility.
Title: Re: Exploritory Reference: X compared to Y = possible Discrepancy?
Post by: Serack on July 11, 2012, 04:30:31 PM
Btw, by moving this thread, I ment the discrepancy thread.
Title: Re: Reference: X compared to Y = possible Discrepancy?
Post by: spades8006 on July 18, 2012, 07:39:13 PM
i don't know if this has already been addressed but in dead beat after the power goes out harry and billy are talking in his office the harry rides the elevator down... i don't have my book on me so i can't directly quote the relevant passage
 
Title: Re: Reference: X compared to Y = possible Discrepancy?
Post by: Paladino on July 26, 2012, 12:31:38 PM
I'm not sure if it has been mentioned, but:

On Backup, Bob tells Thomas that the sorceres/witch didn't kill him because she wouldn't be able to hide the stench of black magic from Harry so soon after casting it. On SF, Morgan confront Harry at Sells lake house after Harry summons Toot, even grab his shoulders, and acuse Harry of killing two person (or it's people?) the night before. Had Harry really comitted such act, he would have the black magic feel on him, and Morgan should know such thing..

So there is a discrepancy, or one day is enough for the stench to go away, or Morgan dislike for Harry was so big he was disregarding evidence of Harry inocence?

I think the last option is unlike Morgan character, as shown at the end of the book. The way Harry describe Black magic foulness, I think it would last little more than a day. So I think it was something Jim hadn't decide so early in the series. 
Title: Re: Reference: X compared to Y = possible Discrepancy?
Post by: Mr. Death on July 26, 2012, 04:43:12 PM
Probably has to do with the sunrise. If I'm not mistaken, a full day had passed between Sells blowing up Tommy and Morgan confronting Harry, and the sunrise would have wiped away residue from any spell. Backup takes place over the course of less than a day, with no sunrise in the middle.
Title: Re: Exploritory Reference: X compared to Y = possible Discrepancy?
Post by: Mr. Death on August 01, 2012, 07:29:22 PM
Another possible discrepancy is that in Storm Front, Harry feels hopeless because someone got a piece of his hair, yet in Changes, Binder simply shaves his head and dips in the lake, removing all chances of Harry tracking him.

One can get around this by saying that in SF the spell was powered by a lightning storm so maybe that had the ability to target better?
I'm doing a reread and I just got to this part, so I've some new insight to add here.

In Turn Coat, Harry mentions that shaving your head would prevent the spell from working, but not if the hair being used had been plucked root and all. In Storm Front, Harry had no way of telling whether the person had tore it out by the root or not, so for all he knew shaving his head wouldn't have helped anyway.
Title: Re: Reference: X compared to Y = possible Discrepancy?
Post by: Ziggelly on August 02, 2012, 05:28:43 AM
??? But doesn't pulling out hair pretty much always take some of the root? How could it not?
Title: Re: Reference: X compared to Y = possible Discrepancy?
Post by: THE_ANGRY_GAMER on August 02, 2012, 07:13:13 PM
In SF, the guy cuts off his hair, so this doesn't work. It's entirely possible Harry didn't know this though. Also, it's not like Harry was really in a position to get his head shaved there. It's also worth noting that Harry was not exactly acting rationally there. He was looking for someone to blame and/or attack. Gimpy and Marcone provided that.
Title: Re: Reference: X compared to Y = possible Discrepancy?
Post by: Mr. Death on August 03, 2012, 04:00:24 PM
??? But doesn't pulling out hair pretty much always take some of the root? How could it not?
Hair tears as easily as anything else, You could yank on hair and end up just ripping it in half, rather than ripping it from the root.
Title: Re: Reference: X compared to Y = possible Discrepancy?
Post by: zug on October 22, 2012, 01:13:30 AM
Posting this here at Serack's suggestion:

At the end of Ghost Story, it's strongly implied that Justine and Thomas will be able to touch each other after Justine has sex with her friend. If it was that simple to fix the True Love WC no touch protection, why did they go through years of heartache and pain because they couldn't touch each other? Why not just sleep with other people on a regular basis so they could spend time together?
Title: Re: Reference: X compared to Y = possible Discrepancy?
Post by: Serack on October 22, 2012, 01:21:37 AM
You might add a line in there about "Why didn't Thomas' sexual adventures break the protection?"
Title: Re: Reference: X compared to Y = possible Discrepancy?
Post by: Mr. Death on October 22, 2012, 03:47:23 AM
The protection seems kind of individualized--Thomas having sex with someone doesn't change the last person Justine had sex with, and that seems to be the deciding factor.

I think Jim mentioned that the protection has to do with the merging of life forces inherent in the intimacy of the act that grants the protection, and the last person you 'merged' with is the one that counts.
Title: Re: Reference: X compared to Y = possible Discrepancy?
Post by: Aminar on November 08, 2012, 03:34:06 PM
Quote
I took off my coat and looked around the lab until I located my clawhammer. I picked it up.
Bob's voice gained a hurried, stammering edge. "And while I know that wasn't exactly the mission you
sent me out on, you have to admit that it was really quite a noble purpose that totally supported your
quest to preserve life."
I took a practice swing with the hammer. I took my duster off, folded it, laid it over the table, and tried
again. Much better. I fixed a murderous gaze on the skull on the shelf.
Found this while listening to the Blood Rites audio book.
Follow Harry's coat.  It does some odd and silly things like teleport back onto him.  And as I told Serack, people don't wear multiple coats if they want to move their arms.  And with all the fights Harry gets in...
Title: Re: Reference: X compared to Y = possible Discrepancy?
Post by: Serack on November 08, 2012, 06:03:50 PM
Being a natural born Floridian, the subtleties of layered winter clothing necessary for living in a place like Chicago are rather abstract to me, but it certainly looks like that sequence of events included some implausible redundancies. 

I added a link to your post that goes like this:

The repeated coat removal coat removal (http://www.jimbutcheronline.com/bb/index.php/topic,32830.msg1650413.html#msg1650413)
Title: Re: Reference: X compared to Y = possible Discrepancy?
Post by: Eleyctra on November 09, 2012, 12:25:52 AM
Being a natural born Floridian, the subtleties of layered winter clothing necessary for living in a place like Chicago are rather abstract to me, but it certainly looks like that sequence of events included some implausible redundancies. 

I added a link to your post that goes like this:

The repeated coat removal coat removal (http://www.jimbutcheronline.com/bb/index.php/topic,32830.msg1650413.html#msg1650413)

Darn you Serack! I clicked your link and became confused. Then I clicked again and again. Then I realized what you did... -.-
Title: Re: Reference: X compared to Y = possible Discrepancy?
Post by: Serack on November 09, 2012, 11:03:28 AM
lol, was just showing off what I added to the OP to give some evidence of inclusion to Aminar in case it was too buried to easily notice.  Kind of an "update" post.

By the way, thanks to Ms Duck I know how to make links that open within the page rather than opening a new one... I might edit all those links to do that...
Title: Re: Reference: X compared to Y = possible Discrepancy?
Post by: RobReece on November 16, 2012, 10:15:47 PM
I've been trying to ask a question or maybe a possible discrepancy... In PG, When Harry goes to pick up Molly and then on to Michaels house, Mouse is with him.  When Murphy takes him home after the phobphage attack, she lets him out early so he can walk Mouse.  But where is mouse when Harry is at the convention that first day?
Title: Apparent NN Gateway contradiction/discontinuity [Series spoilers]
Post by: Serack on July 12, 2013, 01:28:06 PM
Ok, it was brought up in another topic how this quote:

Quote from: WN Ch 39
Gates to the spirit world paid absolutely no attention to trivial things like geography - they obeyed laws of imagination, intention, patterned thought.  Even if Cowl was back there, he wouldn't be able to open a gate to the same place as mine, because he didn't think like me, feel like me, or share my intent and purpose.

Seems to contradict several other experiences in the Dresden Files.  In the spirit of trying to provide material for the X compared to Y = possible Discrepancy? (http://www.jimbutcheronline.com/bb/index.php/topic,32830.0.html) reference thread in the DFRC I thought I might dedicate a topic to this to gather contrary passages, and then the reference can link to this topic as the resource for the possible "discrepancy"

Passages where a wizard expects to/manages to open a portal to the same place a different wizard did:

It is possible that this apparent "discrepancy" could be bridged by the fact that the wizards in question did in fact share "intent and purpose"
Title: Re: Apparent NN Gateway contradiction/discontinuity [Series spoilers
Post by: Phaeton Seraph on July 12, 2013, 01:57:51 PM
Presumably, some Ways, or parts thereof are "fixed".   So certain intersections or nexuses  would always be the same.  Like the the portal Harry and others use to get to Edinburgh.  Perhaps enough Wizards have chosen those points that a patterned consensual thought has fixed them in place.  And possibly some are less fixed, but not too far off because the mortal world and the NN are too closely paired at those locations to be otherwise.

As for the less firmly fixed points, or making a portal in some random location, the two other instances you mention for Molly and Margaret and Harry:
Harry and his mother have a genetic connection, we could argue that he might have a tendency to think in a similar way.  More importantly, by listening to her memories via the pendant and following her directions, imagination, intention and patterned thought have been guided to be the same.

Molly is Harry's student.  As a great deal of magic is based on imagination (and will), Molly's imagination and patterns of thinking will be similar to Harry's because she has been learning to use hers from Harry so there will be similarity.   Additionally, Harry said the location was near to a Way.  Ways are fairly fixed.  They're like NN King's road's.  They're well established. 
Title: Re: Apparent NN Gateway contradiction/discontinuity [Series spoilers]
Post by: UncommonSense on July 12, 2013, 02:00:03 PM
I feel like there are set doors and paths that can be used on a (semi)consistent basis.  Which would explain how Harry's mother's ruby can impart that kind of knowledge.  Gatekeeper alludes to something similar in CD:

Quote
      "Those of us who spend any amount of time walking the Ways tend to develop a certain
amount of camaraderie.  We would have dinner every so often, compare notes of our walks."...

That's why when Harry pops through a specific alley wall, he gets to Edinburgh.  But, like you said, if he randomly opens a way then all bets are off.  Also, I thought I remember reading in one of the books some character stating that the ways change over time?  Maybe I'm misremembering or thinking of a different series.
Title: Re: Apparent NN Gateway contradiction/discontinuity [Series spoilers]
Post by: robertltux on July 12, 2013, 02:32:07 PM
[invoke: Charlie Epps] The pattern of the ways is partly will and partly %hideously complex number theory%. Maggie senior figured out the Metacalculus so she could correct the 11 dimensional geometry...

Ways are created when hundreds/thousands of wizards/things have Intent close enough to Burn/Crease the Transtemporal Fabric (or one Wizard can see an existing "crease").
Title: Re: Apparent NN Gateway contradiction/discontinuity [Series spoilers]
Post by: Rasins on July 12, 2013, 02:41:17 PM
Also, don't forget that some inconsistencies can be attributed to Harry just being wrong.  His understanding of moving between our world and the NN early on may have been in err.  He's had a lot more experience at it now, and he has a "map" in the ruby his mother left him.

Actually, I'm thinking it's kind of a combination of both fixed and fluid.  The fixed are based on experience, and the fluid are much more influenced by imagination, desire, and intent.
Title: Re: Apparent NN Gateway contradiction/discontinuity [Series spoilers]
Post by: knnn on July 12, 2013, 03:24:23 PM
Other examples:

- In SmF, Nico says that Harry shouldn't try running to the NN from Demonreach because of what is on the other side.  How does he know where Harry will open a portal to?  Possibly because maybe "all roads lead to ruin" from there.

- In CD, Harry threatens to open a portal to the RW to kill a Sidhe.  Potentially, he could have done that back in PG to escape At instead of trudging back to the place Lily was holding open.  Answer is maybe it takes a "lot" of power to open a portal in At.

- Similarly, how about the portal that the Fetches used?  Harry seemed to believe he'd end up at the same place without problems.

- Ditto following into the ghost demesne back in Grave Peril.
 
Title: Re: Apparent NN Gateway contradiction/discontinuity [Series spoilers]
Post by: redwizard on July 12, 2013, 07:30:58 PM
The NN appears to function in two ways, at least with regards to opening Ways.
The first is the standard fixed point where two geographic locations are linked, i.e. the shed in Chicago and the one at the White Council headquarters. These are so easy even a caveman could do it.  They are also the most common ones.

The second, is the type described by the quote in the first post in this thread. They are what I think of as directed Ways. They depend on all of the qualities Harry mentioned as well as a significant investment of will. The one opened to CI for the Grey Council, the one Mab opened to send Harry back in Cold Days (this one took a large amount of power as well), and the one sending the raiding party back from CI to Chicago as well. I would also think when a summoning happens a direct way is used.

I don't see it as much a discontinuity as a plot device. Just think of it as when a wizard reaches a certain point they have access to the DF version of a transporter.
Title: Re: Apparent NN Gateway contradiction/discontinuity [Series spoilers]
Post by: Phaeton Seraph on July 13, 2013, 01:24:35 AM
I feel like there are set doors and paths that can be used on a (semi)consistent basis.  Which would explain how Harry's mother's ruby can impart that kind of knowledge.  Gatekeeper alludes to something similar in CD:

That's why when Harry pops through a specific alley wall, he gets to Edinburgh.  But, like you said, if he randomly opens a way then all bets are off.  Also, I thought I remember reading in one of the books some character stating that the ways change over time?  Maybe I'm misremembering or thinking of a different series.

Of course the Ways change over time, the mortal world does too.  If you pave paradise to put up a parking lot, the park or empty lot no longer has a connection with what it used to be connected to.   If a bad neighbourhood is gentrified, then the neighbourhood will lose its kinship with a dangerous part of of the NN.  Likewise if a nice area becomes run down, or seedy.
Title: Re: Apparent NN Gateway contradiction/discontinuity [Series spoilers]
Post by: wyltok on July 13, 2013, 05:31:26 PM
I've always felt that when it comes to entering the Never Never, there's gates and then there's Ways. From how they are used, it appears that Ways behave differently from Gates in that an established Way works the same for everyone, whereas a Gate is trickier.

When it comes to defending his house from Never Never incursions, it seems Harry's method was to try to avoid making his house the exit of a Way. Instead, he seems to have relied on the inherent instability of Gates (this could be one possible explanation for why Harry's place lead to different Never Never locations in Grave Peril and Changes) to make it harder for his enemies to attack him (since they would have to spend the effort to find out what new spot in the Never Never corresponded to Harry's house at the time of their attack).

Meanwhile, both Lea and Corpsetaker appear to have relied on the opposite strategy: turn the Never Never side into a Way, and fortify it as much as possible. Harry's hideout appears to be a compromise: since he's hardly ever there, he deemed it better to have a stable Way that lead to one of the safe paths through Winter used by the Council.

Of course, just because Gates are not as stable as Ways, that doesn't mean that one cannot find a path to their target in the real world. Both Thomas and Cowl accomplished it in White Night. I suggest that both followed a similar method, namely, using a tracking spell on someone on the Real World to lead them.

I've always considered Proven Guilty a good example of a story with both Gates and Ways. The closed cinema theater was a Way that always lead to a spot close to Artic Tor. Meanwhile, the mirrors used by the fetches in their other attacks are merely Gates, which means that when they escape into the Never Never, it's harder for other people to follow them.

The question is, what turns a Gate into a Way? We don't know for sure, but I would offer this: it shouldn't be that hard for the same beings that opens a gate in the same place in the real world (or vice-versa) to end up at the same location in the Never Never (or vice-versa) every time. Do it often enough, and you weaken the barrier between the Never Never and the real world (this is how Harry describes it in Changes) and a Way is made. This could explain why Harry managed to open the same Way she did, since I think it's fair to say Harry was more in common with Cowl than with Agatha.

P.S. I suspect that Fae can discern from the real world the type of place a Gate (or a Way) will open to. It's something we see Lily do in White Night, and it's the only thing that would explain why Tiny the Gruff (considering how injured he was) would dare jump into the Never Never from the train station in Turn Coat without being worried about reaching the same place in the Never Never as the hobs.
Title: Re: Exploritory Reference: X compared to Y = possible Discrepancy?
Post by: lilylis on July 30, 2013, 04:37:20 AM
- Murphy's P90 that fell into the lake gets found.
I always thought she just got a new one.  Does it still have the engraved plate?
-
It's the same P90 that Kincaid gave her in a box of chocolates...engraved plate and all.  Its a little thing, but it bugs me everytime Murph uses that gun after Small Favor when she dropped it into the lake after Tessa lashes out at her.

I wish I knew how she got it back. In one short story, Harry talks about getting paid for finding something lost in the lake.  It wasn't Murphy's gun, but I keep hoping for a line in some short story or book that explains how Murph got her P90 back....perhaps Harry found it for her since he's good at locating things.

It's probably just something that got lost in all the writing and editing...but I still wish Jim would give an explanation....it'd be kinda of cute...even though Harry was jealous of Kincaid he still found Murphy's P90 back out of the lake for her.
Title: Re: Exploritory Reference: X compared to Y = possible Discrepancy?
Post by: Serack on July 30, 2013, 11:02:23 AM
It's the same P90 that Kincaid gave her in a box of chocolates...engraved plate and all.  Its a little thing, but it bugs me everytime Murph uses that gun after Small Favor when she dropped it into the lake after Tessa lashes out at her.

I wish I knew how she got it back. In one short story, Harry talks about getting paid for finding something lost in the lake.  It wasn't Murphy's gun, but I keep hoping for a line in some short story or book that explains how Murph got her P90 back....perhaps Harry found it for her since he's good at locating things.

It's probably just something that got lost in all the writing and editing...but I still wish Jim would give an explanation....it'd be kinda of cute...even though Harry was jealous of Kincaid he still found Murphy's P90 back out of the lake for her.


Maybe Kincaid got her the inside line on getting the good stuff rather than the civilian versions of stuff like this, so she wouldn't have had trouble replacing it her own self.

Wellll, no maybe about it. ;)
Title: Re: Reference: X compared to Y = possible Discrepancy?
Post by: Mr. Death on July 30, 2013, 02:11:50 PM
Harry mentions at some point helping a coin collector retrieve a jar full of coins he'd dropped in the same lake, so it's possible Harry helped her find it.

Or, while it fell in the water, it got caught in the Water Beetle's rigging and didn't sink to the bottom.
Title: Re: Exploritory Reference: X compared to Y = possible Discrepancy?
Post by: lilylis on August 12, 2013, 01:23:24 AM
Maybe Kincaid got her the inside line on getting the good stuff rather than the civilian versions of stuff like this, so she wouldn't have had trouble replacing it her own self.

Wellll, no maybe about it. ;)

 although she could/would replace it herself...unlikely she'd redo the engraving. She's a practical girl. I will pretend JB intended to tells us how Harry found it for her shortly after....but the editors deleted that part out of a story..  :-X
Title: Re: Exploritory Reference: X compared to Y = possible Discrepancy?
Post by: Serack on August 12, 2013, 11:17:27 AM
although she could/would replace it herself...unlikely she'd redo the engraving. She's a practical girl. I will pretend JB intended to tells us how Harry found it for her shortly after....but the editors deleted that part out of a story..  :-X

I don't remember the engraving being mentioned again after SmF, but that could be an oversight on my part.

You can take it as an indirect WoJ that Murph is capable of replacing it herself through chanels she was introduced to by Kincaid.  (not that she did, just that she is capable)  Jim told me that when I brought into question whether it was the PS-90 (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FN_P90#PS90_semi-automatic_models) civvy version now or the military version in a Beta discussion.
Title: Re: Reference: X compared to Y = possible Discrepancy?
Post by: Quantus on August 12, 2013, 03:03:01 PM
The link on Maggie Sr. Ovaries is broken.  I think I recall some of that discussion or at least the early parts, but was curious how it ended up

And purely for the sake of a complete reference, Larry Fowler's name changes to Jerry for one line in the scene in Death Masks, at least in my copy (its possible that they would have wanted to change this in later printings):

Quote
Jerry paused for a moment, and then said, "Dr. Ortega, welcome to the show. You have a reputation as one of the premier analysts of paranormal phenomena in the world. You have proven that a wide variety of so-called supernatural occurrences were actually clever hoaxes. Can you tell us a little about that?"
Title: Re: Reference: X compared to Y = possible Discrepancy?
Post by: phoenixjustice on August 13, 2013, 02:43:11 AM
And purely for the sake of a complete reference, Larry Fowler's name changes to Jerry for one line in the scene in Death Masks, at least in my copy (its possible that they would have wanted to change this in later printings):

Yeah it's the same in my copy as well.
Title: Re: Reference: X compared to Y = possible Discrepancy?
Post by: Serack on September 04, 2013, 06:26:52 PM
Harry's age when he first used magic/was adopted by Justin is referred to several times, and the first age given is different from most of the others.

Below are all the relevant quotes I can find.  I think there is one where Harry says that Elaine was adopted a couple few weeks after he was, but I can't find it right now.

The gyst is that in Summer Knight Harry says that he and Elaine were adopted at 10.  In Proven Guilty Harry says that Justin adopted him two weeks after his magic manifested.  In Ghost Story he says his first time using magic broke the Iowa state high school long-jump record, and Ghost Story also says that he was 12 when he met Elaine.

There are also many mentionings of Harry's first lessons occuring around 13.

Quote from: SK Ch 7
"We got adopted by the same man when we were ten.

Quote from: PG Ch 41
"My fist time..." [/snip] It was maybe two weeks before Justin adopted me," I said.  "I was in school and small.  All elbows and ears.  Hadn't hit my growth spurt yet, and it was spring

Quote from: SmF Ch 1
The memory of my first shielding lesson under Justin DuMorne wasn't a particularly sentimental one.  "Baseballs."
Merciful God," Charity said, shaking her head.  "How old were you?"
"Thirteen."

Quote from: GS Ch. 12
I broke the Iowa state high school long-jump record [/snip]  I hadn't even gotten serious about puberty yet.

Quote from: GS Ch 20
And I was nearly thirteen, so that was really saying something.
[/snip]
"Flickum bicus!"

Quote from: GS ch 30
I hadn't really been interested in girls yet when I met Elaine.  We'd both been twelve, bright and stubborn"

We also have this WoJ on the matter:
Quote from: WoJ
How old were Eb and Maggie Sr when they first manifested a talent?
Same age as Harry–around 12 or 13.
Title: Re: Reference: X compared to Y = possible Discrepancy?
Post by: 123456789blaaa on September 21, 2013, 01:18:22 AM
I believe there was also a WoJ about the "Demonreach disintegration wall destroying Harry's amulet" problem in CD. I'll try and find it.
Title: Re: Reference: X compared to Y = possible Discrepancy?
Post by: TheCuriousFan on September 21, 2013, 01:35:50 AM
I believe there was also a WoJ about the "Demonreach disintegration wall destroying Harry's amulet" problem in CD. I'll try and find it.

Rasins: I've got a couple of questions, the first one has to do with Harry’s amulet.

Jim: Okay, yes, Harry’s amulet, right.

Rasins: We saw it at the birthday party and never again….did it survive the circle on Demonreach?

Jim:Oh yes.

Rasins: Was it taken off and in his pocket?

Jim: I believe it was, it was with his gear right, he took it off and handed it to Michael and didn't I specifically mention it?

Rasins: You mentioned that he took his coat off but not the amulet.

Jim: Okay yeah, no but it had to have gone with the coat, although although if that wasn't written, that was an oversight during the editing process, which was a little rushed. I think the post-production on that was, from start to finish, I think it was 15 days, so there was a lot of back and forth and a lot of me not sleeping during the process.

*Audience laughter*

Here you go.
Title: Re: Reference: X compared to Y = possible Discrepancy?
Post by: 123456789blaaa on September 21, 2013, 01:37:03 AM
Here you go.

Thank you again  ;D.
Title: Re: Exploritory Reference: X compared to Y = possible Discrepancy?
Post by: Xandarth on September 21, 2013, 01:59:08 AM
- Harry's fifth floor office is on the fourth floor.
This is actually quite easy to explain if you assume Martin was British or from any Commonwealth nation initially or indeed if he was simply was educated in one of these countries.

British labeling of floors begins with the level of the building accessible from the ground being called the "ground floor" as opposed to US naming convention that refers to this floor as the "first floor." The floor above this is referred to as the "first floor" under the British naming convention but under the US naming convention would be called the "second floor."

So Harry saying his office was on the fifth floor and Martin saying his office was on the fourth isn't a discrepancy. They could both have actually been talking about the same floor. ;)

Or maybe the explosives were all attached to the roof of the room below Harry's office. Either way totally fine. :P
Title: Re: Reference: X compared to Y = possible Discrepancy?
Post by: knnn on February 06, 2014, 02:39:07 PM
Another possible discrepancy:

In Bombshells, Molly notes Justine using that "Little White Card" to rack up considerable expense buying clothes for the assault team, yet when Thomas hands her the card in Cold Days, she doesn't seem to recognize it.
Title: Re: Reference: X compared to Y = possible Discrepancy?
Post by: Tami Seven on February 06, 2014, 03:11:10 PM
Another possible discrepancy:

In Bombshells, Molly notes Justine using that "Little White Card" to rack up considerable expense buying clothes for the assault team, yet when Thomas hands her the card in Cold Days, she doesn't seem to recognize it.

Molly didn't use Justine's card herself,  only saw Justine handling it. One possibility is that, in Bombshells Molly thought it was an ordinary credit card. In CD, she got to take a closer look and learned exactly what it was.

Or, it's a mistake on JB'S part.
Title: Re: Reference: X compared to Y = possible Discrepancy?
Post by: knnn on February 06, 2014, 04:11:39 PM
Molly didn't use Justine's card herself,  only saw Justine handling it. One possibility is that, in Bombshells Molly thought it was an ordinary credit card. In CD, she got to take a closer look and learned exactly what it was.


Quote from: Cold Days
Thomas snorted and slipped a white plastic card out of his pocket. It was utterly unmarked except for a few stamped numbers and a magnetic strip. He flicked it across the table to Molly. “When you get your pizza, have them run that.”

Molly studied the card, back and front. “Is this a Diners Club card or something?”

Basically, Molly doesn't even recognize the card as a credit card. 

Or, it's a mistake on JB'S part.

---> Like I said "possible discrepancy".
Title: Re: Reference: X compared to Y = possible Discrepancy?
Post by: Gigglestomp on May 01, 2014, 03:36:08 PM
We mentioned in this thread quite a few discrepancies in regards to opening the ways. In some situations people are shown to open ways that others have previously opened, or expect to be able to open a way and end up in the same place as someone else had previously.

I do not think this is a discrepancy if you look at the fundamental way that the nevernever and the ways function.

The Way of "The Ways" Theory:
Every single thing has one or more ideas associated with it. Everywhere that one place has a similar quality or idea associated with it as another place, that “same-ness” causes the mortal world and the nevernever to touch.

For example, a bar (let’s call it “Origin”) might touch a space in the nevernever, we will call it “Space A” that may be close to the erlking’s domain in faerie because of the similarities in feeling to one of his halls. That same bar ALSO touches another space in the nevernever at the exact same time, “Space B”, which is close to the realm of Dionysus, not in faerie at all. At the same time, it also touches “Space C” in some section of the nevernever where the Pulp fiction movie is real and the fictional bar touches the in-real-life bar “Origin” where it was shot.
Now, each of Origin’s destinations in the feels like Origin” in at least one aspect, but it also feels like quite a lot of other things too! Each of these traits links up to a different place in the real world, that might not even be a bar.

Now, let’s define a “Way” or “One of the Ways” as a place in the nevernever that has a lot of traits/connections, like an airport! A person can get many, many places from that airport.
It just so happens that most of the “Ways” are in faerie, or close to it. Why? Because faerie is the closest spot in the nevernever to the mortal world. It touches the most places in real life. Probably the fae chose to live there for that very reason (They like to mingle with mortals).

When someone says they “Know a Way” all they are saying is they know a place in the real world, that takes them to a place in the nevernever that has a lot of useful connections/associations with real life places – Edinburgh Scotland, Chichen Itza, Ben and Jerry’s, Disneyland, wherever.

Harry mentioned that generally it’s nearly impossible for one person to open a way to the exact same place as another person.

Why?

Because:
1.   You need to be in the exact same spot.
2.   You need to know the exact trait of sameness you are trying to get to. Remember, “Origin” links up to Space A, B, and C for different reasons.

And then, once you get there, you need to:
1.   Be in the exact same spot in the nevernever.
2.   You need to know the exact trait of sameness you are trying to get to. Remember, “Space A” links up to “Origin” but it probably also links up to countless other places, a different place for every trait/idea it contains.
It’s unreasonable to assume a random person would know the exact link Harry or someone else is utilizing on either trip, so it’s generally impossible to open a spot to the same area as someone else.


This rule has many exceptions in the books that are listed previously in this thread. I’m not going to link to all the individual posts here, we are already here.
But a few examples:
Harry expects Molly to be able to open a Way from the storage unit to a piece of the nevernever close to a Way in faerie, that is a trail to a place that lets you cross over into Edinburgh. She would not be able to do so by simply opening a way. But by telling her basically where she would be going, he gave her the keystone/idea/coordinates that she would need to come out where she needed to. If she has just randomly opened a Way without knowing that a “Trail to Edinburgh” was an option, she could have ended up in any one of a million places. Maybe the reality in the nevernever where Dexter’s mother’s murder took place in the Showtime tv show?

When Peabody was running from the Edinburgh complex, Harry was convinced he had to catch him before he jumped into the nevernever, or it would be hopeless. Why? Because since Harry has no idea which “Space” he is aiming for from “Origin” Harry could end up in any one of countless places in the nevernever by trying to open a random gate. This is different than Harry and Molly in the storage locker because Molly was told the general Zip Code of where she was going.




I’m also going to use this theory to explain one of the many crazy “Odin/Mab” creating a gate to a specific place directly things.
Odin creates a lightning gate in the real world. A physical object. Let’s say it doesn’t even do anything. (Gate A)
He creates a lightning gate in the nevernever – say on Midgard. Again, doesn’t do anything. (Gate B)
He then creates an identical gate that doesn’t do anything in an entirely different part of the real world. (Gate C)
These gates do nothing on their own, but because they are identical, that idea/sameness creates a connection between the nevernever and the real world. Like drawing a line with a pencil.
Gate A and Gate C both have the same trait as Gate B.
Gate B has the same trait as Gate A and Gate C.
By creating this sameness, he could then open up a portal at Gate A, which would undoubtedly lead to Gate B. Then he could open up a way at Gate B that could lead to Gate C (or back to Gate A).
From Chichen Itza, Odin’s gate could have tossed Harry on his ass in Chicago. Just like how Mab’s portal in Harry’s WK quarters tossed him on his ass in Chicago.
Harry realizes that ideas connect the nevernever, but he isn’t on the scale where he can easily make new connections. Odin and Mab have enough juice to create similarities between places, and similarities automatically create paths.

Also, by creating a Gate D, Gate B would then have 3 different gates connected to it, and an alternate destination from Gate A. Odin could send his group to one place, and Harry to another, or even send every single person walking through the gate to a different place. All he needs to do is build the similar gates elsewhere. Which…theoretically a God could do?


Title: Re: Reference: X compared to Y = possible Discrepancy?
Post by: knnn on May 01, 2014, 03:57:47 PM
Maybe.

The problem is that it's not "path to Edinburgh", it's "a couple of steps from a path in the NN that happens to lead to one of the NN connections to the entrance to Edinburgh".  This doesn't sound quote like a localized area.
 
Now maybe you can still argue that somehow the intent to get to Edinburgh is enough?  That puts a lot of faith in the AI (for the lack of a better word) of spell to bring you exactly to where you desire.  This seems a lot more subtle than what you usually get for instant, evocation-like spells. 

Like I said.   Maybe.

How about another example?

In White Night, Harry opens up a NN portal and Thomas just happens to be standing outside.  Now maybe Thomas found one of those point where the NN touches, but how did Harry know exactly where to open the portal or which exact idea would bring Thomas?  Again, you can argue that Harry happened to have Thomas in his mind, so the spell automatically figured out where a White Court vampire would end up yada, yada, but that seems way more advanced than what the text seems to be implying.

Title: Re: Reference: X compared to Y = possible Discrepancy?
Post by: Tami Seven on May 01, 2014, 04:30:14 PM
Maybe.

The problem is that it's not "path to Edinburgh", it's "a couple of steps from a path in the NN that happens to lead to one of the NN connections to the entrance to Edinburgh".  This doesn't sound quote like a localized area.
 
Now maybe you can still argue that somehow the intent to get to Edinburgh is enough?  That puts a lot of faith in the AI (for the lack of a better word) of spell to bring you exactly to where you desire.  This seems a lot more subtle than what you usually get for instant, evocation-like spells. 

Like I said.   Maybe.

How about another example?

In White Night, Harry opens up a NN portal and Thomas just happens to be standing outside.  Now maybe Thomas found one of those point where the NN touches, but how did Harry know exactly where to open the portal or which exact idea would bring Thomas?  Again, you can argue that Harry happened to have Thomas in his mind, so the spell automatically figured out where a White Court vampire would end up yada, yada, but that seems way more advanced than what the text seems to be implying.

IIRC Harry said that Thomas should have been able to open the portal between the NeverNever and the Deeps because he had an emotional,  though negative,  connection to it. If Harry had somehow signaled Thomas who then opened the Portal, that might have made more sense. But maybe it was enough that Thomas knew where to go, where the portal would appear while Harry had an image in his mind of Thomas standing there waiting fir him.
Title: Re: Reference: X compared to Y = possible Discrepancy?
Post by: Gigglestomp on May 01, 2014, 04:38:46 PM
IIRC Harry said that Thomas should have been able to open the portal between the NeverNever because he had an emotional,  though negative,  connection to it. If Harry had somehow signaled Thomas who then opened the Portal, that might have made more sense. But maybe it was enough that Thomas knew where to go, where the portal would appear while Harry had an image in his mind of Thomas standing there waiting fir him.

Or one of the place's many connections, connected to Thomas who had had a negative experience there. Harry opened a portal to "Thomas" for lack of a better word. Thomas was standing by to cross over using the same connection.


Also, knnn
I was trying to say exactly what you said here...
"a couple of steps from a path in the NN that happens to lead to one of the NN connections to the entrance to Edinburgh". 

Harry told Morgan and Molly that it let out "a couple of steps from a path in the NN that happens to lead to one of the NN connections to the entrance to Edinburgh".  So they would be able to zone-in on that connection. He didnt tell them "it takes you to edenburgh".
Title: Re: Reference: X compared to Y = possible Discrepancy?
Post by: knnn on May 01, 2014, 04:40:21 PM
IIRC Harry said that Thomas should have been able to open the portal between the NeverNever because he had an emotional,  though negative,  connection to it. If Harry had somehow signaled Thomas who then opened the Portal, that might have made more sense. But maybe it was enough that Thomas knew where to go, where the portal would appear while Harry had an image in his mind of Thomas standing there waiting fir him.

Yup, GP establishes that Thomas can open portals in certain places. 

The timing had to be in Harry's control, so I guess he thought doing it himself would be easier/faster.  Harry having an image of Thomas in mind means that you have to posit that the portal spell can also link to dynamic targets on the fly.  That spell is now becoming *really* versatile.

You can still find enough wiggle room to make it all plausible, but...

Maybe.
Title: Re: Reference: X compared to Y = possible Discrepancy?
Post by: knnn on May 01, 2014, 04:44:13 PM
Or one of the place's many connections, connected to Thomas who had had a negative experience there. Harry opened a portal to "Thomas" for lack of a better word. Thomas was standing by to cross over using the same connection.

But then why did Thomas have to go anywhere?  Opening a portal to "Thomas" should work no matter where Thomas is standing in the Nevernever.

Then you have the implications.  Why should it only work on Thomas?  If Marcone was in the NN, would Harry be able to open a portal from Demonreach directly to Marcone?  After all, he had similar traumatic experience there.  How about opening a portal from the place on the island where Molly became the Winter Lady directly to Molly?
Title: Re: Reference: X compared to Y = possible Discrepancy?
Post by: Gigglestomp on May 01, 2014, 04:44:42 PM
Yup, GP establishes that Thomas can open portals in certain places. 

The timing had to be in Harry's control, so I guess he thought doing it himself would be easier/faster.  Harry having an image of Thomas in mind means that you have to posit that the portal spell can also link to dynamic targets on the fly.  That spell is now becoming *really* versatile.

You can still find enough wiggle room to make it all plausible, but...

Maybe.

It's not really the spell thats versitile. I look at it like "Reality is versitile". Basically reality changes connections constantly. All the spell does is capitalize on a connection specified.

Example:  Harry opens a portal using a connection to thomas - > the connection was already established by reality, the spell needed to do none of this - > the portal follows the connection - > the gate to the NN opens and Thomas is standing on the other side.
Title: Re: Reference: X compared to Y = possible Discrepancy?
Post by: Gigglestomp on May 01, 2014, 04:46:18 PM
But then why did Thomas have to go anywhere?  Opening a portal to "Thomas" should work no matter where Thomas is standing in the Nevernever.

Yep! But Thomas had to get into the Nevernever at a place close to his own heart - probably a brothel or a strip club. So he had to open it in a certain place. Once he was there though, this connection should be viable.

Then you have the implications.  Why should it only work on Thomas?  If Marcone was in the NN, would Harry be able to open a portal from Demonreach directly to Marcone?  After all, he had similar traumatic experience there.  How about opening a portal from the place on the island where Molly became the Winter Lady directly to Molly?

Yes, I think so. That seems correct. At least based on my theory. Which is just a theory. They would have to be in the NN though for the protal to be created.


This could spell bad news in some cases. For example, if someone wanted to get to Ivy while she was in the Nevernever, there is no place she could hide. As long as they knew where *exactly* to start from, and then capitalized on the traumatic connection ivy experienced, they could theoretically open a protal right to her, wherever she was. Unless she somehow overcame the trauma and the place was no longer significant to her.
Title: Re: Reference: X compared to Y = possible Discrepancy?
Post by: Tami Seven on May 01, 2014, 05:06:33 PM
Alright, so there are two components to opening a portal into the NeverNever. First is intent/destination, knowing where you want to go. Second is location, the sympathetic alignment of Real World locations with their NeverNever equivalents.

In WN, Thomas had to travel through the NeverNever to get to the Deeps. He couldn't just open a direct portal that lead straight to the Deeps from some other RW location. Only someone with the power of Odin or Mab could do that. So, Thomas knew his destination, he knew where to enter the NeverNever and what path to take. He could have even opened the portal to Deeps himself.

Harry had it trickier. He didn't know what was on the other side of the portal, only that whatever it was someone would be waiting there for him. Thomas found the location with the strongest Sympathetic alignment to the Deeps, Harry simply opened the portal between the two. It may have helped that he knew Thomas would be there.

So, I had it backwards. Harry didn't have to do much. Thomas was the one who lead Marcone and Karrin and company to the exact spot where he knew the portal would appear.
Title: Re: Reference: X compared to Y = possible Discrepancy?
Post by: knnn on May 01, 2014, 05:35:57 PM
So, I had it backwards. Harry didn't have to do much. Thomas was the one who lead Marcone and Karrin and company to the exact spot where he knew the portal would appear.

I don't have the books in front of me, but did Harry open a portal in the exact spot the near-sacrifice took place?
Title: Re: Reference: X compared to Y = possible Discrepancy?
Post by: knnn on May 01, 2014, 05:37:05 PM
Yes, I think so. That seems correct. At least based on my theory. Which is just a theory. They would have to be in the NN though for the protal to be created.

Well then, why couldn't Harry follow Peabody by opening a portal in the same place Peabody did and specify "I wanna follow Peabody"?
Title: Re: Reference: X compared to Y = possible Discrepancy?
Post by: Gigglestomp on May 01, 2014, 05:44:55 PM
Well then, why couldn't Harry follow Peabody by opening a portal in the same place Peabody did and specify "I wanna follow Peabody"?

Peabody didn't have a strong connection to that area. It was just the first place he could manage to open a portal. Thinking "Thomas" doesn't magically establish a connection. It just chooses from available connections. I don't see why peabody would be connected to that particular spot. Remember in Thomas' case he was almost sacrificed.

Also, I think Harry said peabody would open a way, and then from the NN side he would open another way out to the real world. Harry wouldn't know where in the real world he would go, or how that place connected to that place in the NN. If he didn't catch him he was fucked.
Title: Re: Reference: X compared to Y = possible Discrepancy?
Post by: Quantus on May 02, 2014, 01:18:09 AM
Personally I though Thomas's Wayfaring ability was less a matter of him opening portals directly to his target, and more that once he was in the NN he was able to sense where he needed to travel (in the NN) to be able to open a way back.  Essentially his traumatic personal experience (or the locations that resonate with his Hunger, the other criteria he can use) acts as a link the Hunger can follow basically just like harry's tracking spells operate
Title: Re: Reference: X compared to Y = possible Discrepancy?
Post by: Tami Seven on May 02, 2014, 01:43:03 AM
Personally I though Thomas's Wayfaring ability was less a matter of him opening portals directly to his target, and more that once he was in the NN he was able to sense where he needed to travel (in the NN) to be able to open a way back.  Essentially his traumatic personal experience (or the locations that resonate with his Hunger, the other criteria he can use) acts as a link the Hunger can follow basically just like harry's tracking spells operate

Yeah, nothing states that Thomas can't open a portal anywhere. As far as I know doesn't know where in the NN he will end up. Only that, once inside he can find his way back out.
Title: Re: Reference: X compared to Y = possible Discrepancy?
Post by: Gigglestomp on May 02, 2014, 02:55:20 PM
Yeah, nothing states that Thomas can't open a portal anywhere. As far as I know doesn't know where in the NN he will end up. Only that, once inside he can find his way back out.

Thomas himself states that he can only cross over in places that he feels comfortable in - like when he and Michael crossed back over in the gentlemen's club.
Title: Re: Reference: X compared to Y = possible Discrepancy?
Post by: Mr. Death on May 02, 2014, 03:34:04 PM
Thomas also refers to it as crossing over--he might not be able to open a full-blown rift capable of transporting more than one or two people at a time. I wouldn't be surprised if he was limited to just transitioning himself and maybe one or two people he's in physical contact with, without a "portal" opening at all.
Title: Re: Reference: X compared to Y = possible Discrepancy?
Post by: Tami Seven on May 02, 2014, 03:44:40 PM
Thomas also refers to it as crossing over--he might not be able to open a full-blown rift capable of transporting more than one or two people at a time. I wouldn't be surprised if he was limited to just transitioning himself and maybe one or two people he's in physical contact with, without a "portal" opening at all.

Maybe, though we haven't actually seen him do it yet. Then again,  it seems that someone had to get Dresden’s Army into the NeverNever in WN, and I think Harry was too busy to do it himself. If so, then the only other person there able to do it would have been Thomas. 
Title: Re: Reference: X compared to Y = possible Discrepancy?
Post by: Quantus on May 02, 2014, 05:24:13 PM
Sounds about right.  Though Im still curious if he could open a way to that strip club because it was a place of Lust, or because it was Club Zero and thus was where he met Justine.

Quote from: WN
"Thomas," I said. "He's a vampire, and they have the ability to cross into the Nevernever at certain places."

"What kind of places?" Molly asked.

"Places that are, ah," I said, "important to them. Relevant to them in a particular way."

"Places of lust, you mean," Molly said.

I coughed and ate more cereal. "Yeah. And places where significant things have happened to them. In Thomas's case, he was nearly sacrificed by a cult of porn-star sorceresses in those caves a few years a—"

"I'm sorry," Molly said, interrupting. "But it sounded like you said 'cult of porn-star sorceresses.'"

"Yeah," I said.

"Oh," she said, giving me a skeptical look. "Sorry, then. Keep going."

"Anyway. He nearly died there, so I knew he could find it again. He led Marcone and Murphy there, and they were camped out, waiting for me to open a gate."
Title: Re: Reference: X compared to Y = possible Discrepancy?
Post by: Mr. Death on May 02, 2014, 05:31:23 PM
Sounds about right.  Though Im still curious if he could open a way to that strip club because it was a place of Lust, or because it was Club Zero and thus was where he met Justine.
I don't think Thomas would refer to Club Zero as a "gentleman's club" and "one of the finest in town." Not with anything like a straight face, anyway.
Title: Re: Reference: X compared to Y = possible Discrepancy?
Post by: Tami Seven on May 02, 2014, 05:49:53 PM
I don't think Thomas would refer to Club Zero as a "gentleman's club" and "one of the finest in town." Not with anything like a straight face, anyway.

I suspect Thomas does have a certain amount of control over that kind of thing. The Gentleman's Club was probably the Tamest place in Chicago that he could get both himself and Michael to. Tame being a relative concept.
Title: Re: Reference: X compared to Y = possible Discrepancy?
Post by: Quantus on May 05, 2014, 01:11:13 PM
I don't think Thomas would refer to Club Zero as a "gentleman's club" and "one of the finest in town." Not with anything like a straight face, anyway.
Keep in mind this was way before BR, when he was still playing the Clueless Fop.  And Michael's description was a "fleshpit" and a "A house of sin!" And from a certain perspective Club Zero is the finest in town, in the sense that it is the pinnacle of its particular purpose. 
Title: Re: Reference: X compared to Y = possible Discrepancy?
Post by: Mr. Death on May 05, 2014, 02:34:49 PM
Keep in mind this was way before BR, when he was still playing the Clueless Fop.  And Michael's description was a "fleshpit" and a "A house of sin!" And from a certain perspective Club Zero is the finest in town, in the sense that it is the pinnacle of its particular purpose.
Michael would probably have described any strip club as a fleshpit and a house of sin. And Thomas would be hard pressed to misrepresent just what Club Zero was when Michael was right there with him. Club Zero is kind of, well, obvious, and there's no way even Thomas could call it a "gentleman's club."
Title: Re: Reference: X compared to Y = possible Discrepancy?
Post by: Quantus on May 05, 2014, 02:45:18 PM
Michael would probably have described any strip club as a fleshpit and a house of sin. And Thomas would be hard pressed to misrepresent just what Club Zero was when Michael was right there with him. Club Zero is kind of, well, obvious, and there's no way even Thomas could call it a "gentleman's club."
And thats the crux of it: Catholic raised Michael would see any such club as an extreme of sin, while White Court raised Thomas in on the other extreme of the spectrum, and by his families standards it is just another fetish club (if an exclusive one).  I dont think there would be any "misrepresenting", just differing definitions and/or degrees of familiarity.
Title: Re: Reference: X compared to Y = possible Discrepancy?
Post by: knnn on May 05, 2014, 02:54:48 PM
The only reason I would say it might be Club Zero is because you are otherwise granting what appears to be a *lot* of power to White Court vampire.  Consider that every major city has numerous "houses of sin", and for a White Court vampire to be able to detect a portal to any of those means practically instant transportation to any city in the world -- *way* better than anything the White Council apparently has. 

Heck, Chichen Itza has a small town/village maybe 2 miles away (Pisté) that includes multiple hotels (catering to tourists) -- I'd expect "massage services" to be available.  There is also an actual city (Valladolid) is 20 miles away.  Sure it's further away than the 5 miles Harry gets to, but there is a direct road to CI from either of those places.  This means you can commandeer a vehicle --   can always circle around once you get close.

So why didn't Harry ask for Thomas to find the portal?
Title: Re: Reference: X compared to Y = possible Discrepancy?
Post by: Quantus on May 05, 2014, 02:58:27 PM
Because Thomas can only Home In on a resonant location once he's in the NN, and then still has to traverse NN terrain to get there, which may not be anywhere close to where he randomly entered.  The NN is not a nice place...
Title: Re: Reference: X compared to Y = possible Discrepancy?
Post by: Tami Seven on May 05, 2014, 03:00:42 PM
The only reason I would say it might be Club Zero is because you are otherwise granting what appears to be a *lot* of power to White Court vampire.  Consider that every major city has numerous "houses of sin", and for a White Court vampire to be able to detect a portal to any of those means practically instant transportation to any city in the world -- *way* better than anything the White Council apparently has. 

Heck, Chichen Itza has a small town/village maybe 2 miles away (Pisté) that includes multiple hotels (catering to tourists) -- I'd expect "massage services" to be available.  There is also an actual city (Valladolid) is 20 miles away.  Sure it's further away than the 5 miles Harry gets to, but there is a direct road to CI from either of those places.  This means you can commandeer a vehicle --   can always circle around once you get close.

So why didn't Harry ask for Thomas to find the portal?

It has to be someplace Thomas has visited before, regularly and is familiar with. Or someplace, like the deeps, that he holds a strong emotional connection to.
Title: Re: Reference: X compared to Y = possible Discrepancy?
Post by: Mr. Death on May 05, 2014, 03:02:24 PM
And thats the crux of it: Catholic raised Michael would see any such club as an extreme of sin, while White Court raised Thomas in on the other extreme of the spectrum, and by his families standards it is just another fetish club (if an exclusive one).  I dont think there would be any "misrepresenting", just differing definitions and/or degrees of familiarity.
An exclusive fetish club is pretty far from what anyone would consider a "gentleman's club," even the White Court's. It just doesn't fit what you would describe as one, and besides, Thomas's family's standards aren't really his standards. Also, it just doesn't make sense for Thomas to bring Michael to Club Zero. He's trying to stay on Michael's good side, or at least on his 'don't smite me' side--bringing Michael into what is basically a feeding ground for the White Court is just a bad idea.

The only reason I would say it might be Club Zero is because you are otherwise granting what appears to be a *lot* of power to White Court vampire.  Consider that every major city has numerous "houses of sin", and for a White Court vampire to be able to detect a portal to any of those means practically instant transportation to any city in the world -- *way* better than anything the White Council apparently has.
Thomas says he can cross over into places close to his heart, and Harry says he can find the Deeps because of what happened to Thomas personally. So, presumably, he is limited to strip clubs and such that he has personally been to and is associated with.

Also, yeah, what Quantus said--it's not instant, Thomas still has to walk from place to place in the Nevernever.
Title: Re: Reference: X compared to Y = possible Discrepancy?
Post by: Romulan Cmdr on June 10, 2014, 06:23:12 PM
Another note/ thought.
In Cold Days Bob does the whole movie thing with Merlin and the formation of the island.
What if wasn't just across multiple times - what if the discrepancy is on Bob's part and it was across time and dimensions --multiple overlapping dimensions.
Title: Re: Reference: X compared to Y = possible Discrepancy?
Post by: Serack on June 11, 2014, 12:56:21 AM
Another note/ thought.
In Cold Days Bob does the whole movie thing with Merlin and the formation of the island.
What if wasn't just across multiple times - what if the discrepancy is on Bob's part and it was across time and dimensions --multiple overlapping dimensions.

Interesting, although I wouldn't call that a discrepancy... I don't see where it contradicts anything.  Maybe you could start your own topic on it.  Or include it in the knnn's recent discussion about discrepancies and the MM book.
Title: Re: Reference: X compared to Y = possible Discrepancy?
Post by: Romulan Cmdr on June 11, 2014, 01:01:03 AM
Interesting, although I wouldn't call that a discrepancy... I don't see where it contradicts anything.  Maybe you could start your own topic on it.  Or include it in the knnn's recent discussion about discrepancies and the MM book.
which thread is that one?  eh figured it was borderline cause if the vid showed him showing himself in time but was in fact parallel realities.. anyways. just point me to the other thread..
 
Title: Re: Reference: X compared to Y = possible Discrepancy?
Post by: Quantus on June 11, 2014, 12:43:55 PM
Another note/ thought.
In Cold Days Bob does the whole movie thing with Merlin and the formation of the island.
What if wasn't just across multiple times - what if the discrepancy is on Bob's part and it was across time and dimensions --multiple overlapping dimensions.
If Im not mistaken Bob himself speculated at that point that it was Built in 4 dimansions, and most likely built in 5 or more (which means multiple/parallel dimension by normal Sci-fi parlance) but that it was difficult to tell that sort of thing without actually entering a 5th dimansional state and measuring them.  So yes it seems likely, but I dont see a contraction...?


EDIT:  Here's the passage I was thinking of:
Quote from: Cold Days ch 21
“Merlin didn’t build the prison five times,” Bob said. “He built it once. In five different times. All at the same time.”

I felt my brows knit. “Uh. He was in the same place, doing the same thing, in five different times at once?”

“Exactly.”

“That does not make any sense,” I said.

“Look, a mortal jail is built in three dimensions, right? Merlin built this one in four, and probably in several more, though you can’t really tell whether or not he built it in a given dimension until you go there and measure it, and the act of measuring it will change it, but the point is: This is really advanced stuff.”
Title: Re: Reference: X compared to Y = possible Discrepancy?
Post by: Iam that kemmler on August 14, 2014, 09:49:17 PM
Another discrepancy I haven't seen in this thread is the summoning circle

In SF it's Brass

In FM It's copper

In GP it starts as Brass on page 113 of the paperback when he's talking to Bob, but later in the book changes to copper page 200 - when he attempts to summon the nightmare.

I'm rereading book SK right now and the ring is back to copper - I'll update as I finish rereading the series.

In DM the ring is copper.
Title: Re: Reference: X compared to Y = possible Discrepancy?
Post by: Romulan Cmdr on August 15, 2014, 02:05:53 AM
It has to be someplace Thomas has visited before, regularly and is familiar with. Or someplace, like the deeps, that he holds a strong emotional connection to.
Just wanted to add, Thomas met Justine at Club Zero so that would put that place on a strong emotional connection.
Title: Re: Reference: X compared to Y = possible Discrepancy?
Post by: Sharlee on August 15, 2014, 05:49:15 AM
Just wanted to add, Thomas met Justine at Club Zero so that would put that place on a strong emotional connection.

But, again, it wouldn't fit the description of "gentlemen's club".

Hmmm... maybe the club he brought Michael out to just happens to be where Thomas was, when he first learned that his long-lost little brother had moved to Chicago and opened an investigation business there?
Title: Re: Exploritory Reference: X compared to Y = possible Discrepancy?
Post by: Sharlee on August 15, 2014, 06:14:57 AM
I cant help but notice that others have failed to notice that pouring concrete onto the activated ring encased coin should have broken the circle.

Inanimate matter penetrating an empowered circle can only break it if the individual who applies that matter wills it to do so.  We saw that way back in the first book's introduction of magic circles, when Harry empowered the faerie trap, then laid leaves and twigs over it so Toot-toot wouldn't see it.  So long as Harry doesn't will the twigs and leaves, or the wet cement, to disrupt a circle, he can dump stuff on it all day long without a problem.
Title: Re: Exploritory Reference: X compared to Y = possible Discrepancy?
Post by: Quantus on August 15, 2014, 01:27:48 PM
Inanimate matter penetrating an empowered circle can only break it if the individual who applies that matter wills it to do so.  We saw that way back in the first book's introduction of magic circles, when Harry empowered the faerie trap, then laid leaves and twigs over it so Toot-toot wouldn't see it.  So long as Harry doesn't will the twigs and leaves, or the wet cement, to disrupt a circle, he can dump stuff on it all day long without a problem.
Close but not quite.  The person doesnt have to consciously Will it, they just have to have Free Will to do it.  So Toot or Bob cannot break the circle (which is why Bob was able to toss harry a potion through a circle in SF.  However if he accidentally knocks something over the circle that is, in Uriel's words, "A Fair Ball."  That is supposedly one of the most common amateur mistakes young summoners make, and why harry always so careful cleans the area around the circle before he attempts summoning.  Its also apparently why Cats are so common as pets for practitioners, because for reasons unknown they can freely cross Circles without disrupting them. 

I wonder if that makes it harder to contain Cat-based magical creatures, and if it applies to all Felines or only the domestic breeds?  Hmmm...
Title: Re: Reference: X compared to Y = possible Discrepancy?
Post by: Mr. Death on August 15, 2014, 03:30:42 PM
The thing with Toot's circle is that the leaves and twigs were, in a way, part of the material of the circle -- Harry dug the circle out of earth, and twigs and leaves count as part of "earth," at least in Harry's mind.

The concrete would work similarly -- Harry considers it part of the floor that he's dug into, so it's not disrupting the circle's make-up.
Title: Re: Exploritory Reference: X compared to Y = possible Discrepancy?
Post by: Sharlee on August 15, 2014, 07:42:58 PM
Close but not quite.  The person doesnt have to consciously Will it, they just have to have Free Will to do it.  So Toot or Bob cannot break the circle (which is why Bob was able to toss harry a potion through a circle in SF).  However if he accidentally knocks something over the circle that is, in Uriel's words, "A Fair Ball."  That is supposedly one of the most common amateur mistakes young summoners make, and why harry always so careful cleans the area around the circle before he attempts summoning.

So now Shagnasty has free will?  He used a circle to break Harry's soulfire-lasso, so unless skinwalkers have free will, it can't be a prerequisite for circle magic.  As for cleaning the area around a circle and laying it out precisely, that's what's necessary to prepare a circle before it's empowered, to make it operate as efficiently as possible so it can be infused with more energy and restrain more powerful beings.
Title: Re: Exploritory Reference: X compared to Y = possible Discrepancy?
Post by: Sharlee on August 16, 2014, 01:42:20 PM
Yeah, I'd say that the cemetery one is Mavra. But there's no reason for them to get a count of six when there are seven places.

Maybe Harry'd initially been thinking that there were six places to investigate, as he already knew how one of the seven locations had become marked by necromantic power?  The jump from six unaccounted-for places to six necromancers was where the mistake cropped up, possibly from a worst-case-scenario fallacy: Harry knows he's in deep trouble, and unconsciously inflates that trouble in his mind.

Either that, or the process of revising that scene's text accidentally dropped a line in which Harry deduces that the ink spot for the graveyard is easily accounted for: it's where Grevane must've animated those other zombies he'd brought with him to the Forensics Institute. (It's a pretty safe bet that he wouldn't drag a bunch of undead along on the Way to Chicago, where any passing Warden might notice them or their dark energies, and hauling them into town by car or train is even more conspicuous.)  So, that gives two of the spots on Mort's map to Grevane, leaving five unaccounted for.
Title: Re: Exploritory Reference: X compared to Y = possible Discrepancy?
Post by: Sharlee on August 16, 2014, 01:45:35 PM
Certainly. Kemmler stuff, take two:
Those two accounts seem fairly different, don't you think? I mean, I wouldn't consider 1961 as being even close to "during" WW2, as has been pointed out.

Kemmler's the one who taught Corpsetaker everything she knew.  Who's to say he didn't stick around as a shade, same as she did?  The Council could've finally whacked his body for keeps during WWII, then come back and cleaned up the Ghost of Kemmler in 1961.
Title: Re: Reference: X compared to Y = possible Discrepancy?
Post by: Iam that kemmler on August 17, 2014, 11:12:54 PM
Just came across another one

At the end of Summer Knight -

" My staff and blasting rod were in the corner, gleaming as if they'd been polished, and my gun hung in its holster, freshly oiled. The gun had been polished too."

This is the .357 because in Death Masks

"I'd lost my.357 during a battle between the Faerie Courts hosted on clouds over Lake Michigan the previous midsummer, so I'd moved my.44 from the office to home."




Title: Re: Reference: X compared to Y = possible Discrepancy?
Post by: Sharlee on August 18, 2014, 07:34:47 PM
Incidentally, does anyone know what happened to Harry's shield bracelet or rings in Changes?  He's not wearing them at the end, but I don't recall him ever mentioning them being destroyed or lost.
Title: Re: Reference: X compared to Y = possible Discrepancy?
Post by: Romulan Cmdr on August 21, 2014, 08:01:38 PM
Incidentally, does anyone know what happened to Harry's shield bracelet or rings in Changes?  He's not wearing them at the end, but I don't recall him ever mentioning them being destroyed or lost.
Bottom of the lake?
Title: Re: Reference: X compared to Y = possible Discrepancy?
Post by: Quantus on August 21, 2014, 09:21:11 PM
He last used the rings against the Ikk during the Erlking's duel, and was using the shield during the final fight.  When he got back to the boat neither were mentioned again, but he did do some pretty strong grief washing of blood on hands, so odds are he took them off during that.  I'd guess they were left behind with the miscellaneous stuff like the Staff Eb loaned him.  Best we can tell those are either in evidence lockup, or else Murphy or Thomas have them. 
Title: Re: Reference: X compared to Y = possible Discrepancy?
Post by: Iam that kemmler on August 22, 2014, 05:54:59 AM
If he had the rings, he wouldn't of carved the extra runes in his staff.

I guess we won't see the rings again till mirror, mirror - where hopefully we find out the fates of little chicago, the bear buckle, the rings, and the sword cane.
Title: Re: Reference: X compared to Y = possible Discrepancy?
Post by: Ziggelly on August 22, 2014, 02:34:39 PM
If he had the rings, he wouldn't of carved the extra runes in his staff.

I guess we won't see the rings again till mirror, mirror - where hopefully we find out the fates of little chicago, the bear buckle, the rings, and the sword cane.
I don't think the bear buckle is a real loose end; Harry just didn't want to use the buckle again, because when it wore off that first and only time he used it, it made him crash harder than he'd anticipated, leaving him in a very vulnerable position. It simply wasn't worth it. I know that Jim's mentioned this before; he's also mentioned that - from a writer's standpoint - he didn't really want to be leaning on the buckle, because it could easily become a deus ex machina. I'm fairly certain that it was a conscious decision not to use it again, rather than a discrepancy.
Title: Re: Reference: X compared to Y = possible Discrepancy?
Post by: Iam that kemmler on August 29, 2014, 04:03:22 AM
Gates and ways.
http://www.jimbutcheronline.com/bb/index.php/topic,32830.msg1894720.html#msg1894720 (http://www.jimbutcheronline.com/bb/index.php/topic,32830.msg1894720.html#msg1894720)

My theory on this is that we are reading the books from 5 different time lines all slightly different. I think we got a cluebat in the latest book where Harry was avoiding traffic with all the slightly different Harry's waving to each other as they drove around in the old beetle and then spoke to Molly. It ties in with the original Merlin needing to be in 5 places at the same time to build deamonreach - and with Harry (woj stating that Harry was going to break all the rules) breaking the "swim against the currents" rule also fixes the "Xavier" thing - and can actually explain the fixing of little chicago.
Title: Re: Reference: X compared to Y = possible Discrepancy?
Post by: Quantus on September 04, 2014, 03:54:15 PM
Meh, I dont think it has to be that complicated.  I think that Ways to Faery are specifically more repeatable and stable than the average, since Fairy is more strongly anchored to the natural world directly, rather that linked by mortal subjectivity as completely as with more idealogical domains.  This is why it was critical for the WC to secure passage from one of the courts, because those are the only ways that are objective enough to count on for the entire organization.  Note that all the way locations we've seen are all relatively static locations:  bleak, uniform and inhospitable rental space, stairwell near a abandoned meatpacking plant, etc. These are places with rather old and/or established tones, and so it would take more drastic changes to shit them.  If by contrast we were talking about a Movie Screen (and one that wasnt devoted specifically to horror flicks) it would likely open to a wide range of locations depending on which movie was last played and what emotional imprint the last audience left behind. 

It was also stated in GS that powerful NN entities can more directly influence Ways, which is why Evil-bob was able to funnel all NN traffic around CT's lair to his Normandy Beachhead.  Presumably Lea put similar boundaries near harry to funnel access through her Garden.




Dont get me wrong, Im just talking about Way mechanics; I do also subscribe to the theory that the SG dream scene was a glimpse of the multiverse.
Title: Re: Reference: X compared to Y = possible Discrepancy?
Post by: Serack on January 06, 2015, 09:00:42 PM
dangit, apparently I didn't hit post when I wrote it earlier, but...

While going through Skin Game I missed this minor disparity:

at the beginning of Chapter 20 of Small Favor, Harry asks Michael how Murphy is doing after getting hit by a ball from a shotgun blast and Michael differs to Charity's wisdom since she is the one with "medical training"

In Chapter 20 of Skin Game, Michael explains that he is able to diagnose a "radial fracture" of Harry's arm because of his training as a Corpsman while in the service.
Title: Re: Reference: X compared to Y = possible Discrepancy?
Post by: Gigglestomp on January 06, 2015, 09:16:17 PM
dangit, apparently I didn't hit post when I wrote it earlier, but...

While going through Skin Game I missed this minor disparity:

at the beginning of Chapter 20 of Small Favor, Harry asks Michael how Murphy is doing after getting hit by a ball from a shotgun blast and Michael differs to Charity's wisdom since she is the one with "medical training"

In Chapter 20 of Skin Game, Michael explains that he is able to diagnose a "radial fracture" of Harry's arm because of his training as a Corpsman while in the service.

True. I missed that! Though it's possible that his medical training isn't as extensive as hers. Where did she get hers from? She's not a doctor. And he must not have been a Dr. in the service either, since no one calls him by the title. Maybe his knowledge is limited to more common battlefield injuries?
Title: Re: Reference: X compared to Y = possible Discrepancy?
Post by: Serack on January 06, 2015, 09:54:38 PM
True. I missed that! Though it's possible that his medical training isn't as extensive as hers. Where did she get hers from? She's not a doctor. And he must not have been a Dr. in the service either, since no one calls him by the title. Maybe his knowledge is limited to more common battlefield injuries?

A Corpsman, if serving with the Marines, is the equivalent of an Army Medic.

Being able to diagnose a "radial fracture" without an x-ray seems to me to be at odds with not being able to judge the severity of Murphy's injury in Small Favor.
Title: Re: Reference: X compared to Y = possible Discrepancy?
Post by: Quantus on January 07, 2015, 03:36:21 PM
A Corpsman, if serving with the Marines, is the equivalent of an Army Medic.

Being able to diagnose a "radial fracture" without an x-ray seems to me to be at odds with not being able to judge the severity of Murphy's injury in Small Favor.
That was a gunshot, which can have internal "nicks" and whatnot, small-scale damage that cant be seen.  A "Radial Fracture" is essentially just a fancy way to say broken forearm (ie a break of the Raduis bone).  Theoretically /I/ could diagnose that, even if Id be too squeamish to try and set it. 

Random note:  In that murphy scene Michael starts by saying:
Charity is the one who’s had actual medical training, but it seemed a simple enough injury to me. A bandage stopped the bleeding, and we cleaned the wound thoroughly. She should be careful to monitor her condition for the next few days, but I think she’ll be all right.” 

This means that her "actual medical training" involved something more substantial than a military medic, which is interesting.  We have no indication she has ever had any particular career, but it would be entirely within character for her to have gone to nursing school, etc purely to patch up Michael.
Title: Re: Reference: X compared to Y = possible Discrepancy?
Post by: Serack on January 07, 2015, 03:48:46 PM
I need to rev up the wiki editing skills and add her medical training to her DF wiki page
Title: Re: Reference: X compared to Y = possible Discrepancy?
Post by: Serack on April 22, 2016, 05:14:21 PM
The link to the "Maggie the Eldest's ovaries" entry to the OP list is dead, so I'll need to rebuild the explanation of that entry to the list.  Interestingly enough, there is a rather recent WoJ on the subject shortly after the timestamp in this link.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YyAKU7sNWYI
Title: Re: Reference: X compared to Y = possible Discrepancy?
Post by: Serack on April 28, 2019, 04:00:36 PM
I need to do a write up on who hired the Churchmice in Death Masks.  Suffice to say, I’m pretty sure there is a WoJ that SG has it right.