ParanetOnline

The Dresden Files => DF Spoilers => DF Reference Collection => Topic started by: Mickey Finn on March 26, 2010, 04:54:17 PM

Title: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Mickey Finn on March 26, 2010, 04:54:17 PM
Jim has not responded to this topic,  However, I spoke with him at Marscon and told him how I had gone through the whole post and sellected several that I liked after going through everything else I can find that he has said about the series, and asked if he was willing to go over them in an e-interview format and he said he liked that idea, but to wait until after the GS signings were over.  The topic was moved here to give me a chance to go over the questions that have been asked since Marscon. -Serack (http://www.jimbutcheronline.com/bb/index.php?action=profile;u=23736)

Part One:
http://www.jimbutcheronline.com/bb/index.php/topic,631.0.html

Part Two:
http://www.jimbutcheronline.com/bb/index.php/topic,10529.0.html

Quote
Since Jim is not monitoring the boards due to writing crunch times, I thought I'd create a thread specifically aimed at him to check when he can, in order for some questions to avoid being buried in time.

However, we have to be careful and not flood this thread with random questions. So, rules of this thread:

1) No questions obviously aimed at plot points that will be revealed later, such as "Who is the girl Marcone's protecting?" or "What really happened at Arctis Tor before Harry arrived?" or "Who is Cowl under the hood?" This can be a fine line, depending on the question. For instance, "Does Murphy know how to use those katanas, or are they just decorative?" does not violate this rule and will be allowed. Jim may not answer it, of course. Jim may not answer any of these questions.

2) Nothing personal, in this thread. This is for Dresden Files questions, only. If he deviates, well, he's allowed.

3) Don't discuss or derail the thread. If you want to discuss something he's said, make your own thread and quote him.  He can come in that thread and discuss it with you...the point of this thread isn't a one-stop shop for all things Jim, but simply a place where he can see  questions and answer them. If we get into discussions, this thread will wander all over the place (something I normally don't mind, but this thread is an exception).

4) Please do your homework before asking a question...see if you can find the answers elsewhere, first. Unlike some, I do not mind when someone new to the boards asks a question that's been discussed to death, but if an answer is readily answerable elsewhere, then it's a waste of breath in this particular thread. Please also note that there's a FAQ forum near the top of this board. At the time of this writing, it's a tad threadbare, but it is growing.

Two things to remember from the above quote:

1) This is a thread started by the mods to give Jim a place to see questions. He may not answer anything here. The man's busy! This thread is an attempt for him to easily find things. Please do not be offended if he doesn't answer a question you posed.

2) Remember not to discuss things here (answering someone's question because you KNOW the answer...not just your opinion of the answer...is allowed. But discussion in this thread only kills the purpose of this thread, which is to allow board members a place to ask Jim a question about this series without him having to wade through tons of discussion. This does not mean things can't be discussed! We welcome discussion....on other threads. (Exception...if Jim tries to have a discussion with you on here, go ahead. His decisions trump everything else, with the possible exception of Iago's administrative tasks.)

This whole thing started as my own attempt to make it easier on Jim. This was not his design.

Jim has not responded to this topic, see note at the top as to why it is in this section.  -Serack (http://www.jimbutcheronline.com/bb/index.php?action=profile;u=23736)
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Sigma77 on April 07, 2010, 02:10:27 AM
Was Harry's Grandmother (
(click to show/hide)
) a Wizard? Or rather, did she have any magical talent at all?
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: paulWTAMU on April 07, 2010, 02:24:37 AM
Minor clarification request: changes spoiler follows
(click to show/hide)
Also, although I think he is,
(click to show/hide)
(click to show/hide)


(click to show/hide)

What the hell *is* Mouse? And mister...he's getting up in age for a regular cat.  IIRC Dresden'd had him for a while as of Storm Front which would be like 10 or 11 years ago...cats live like 15-20 years.
(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Ororo on April 07, 2010, 05:42:16 PM
Love the books, even though Changes was a little traumatic. What can you tell us about what happens next without giving too much away?
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: jimdastud on April 07, 2010, 06:20:10 PM
Can you give us a rough schedule for the next book?  I'm assuming next April, but that may not be the case since your other series is finished up.
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: svb1972 on April 07, 2010, 06:21:39 PM
Can you give us a rough schedule for the next book?  I'm assuming next April, but that may not be the case since your other series is finished up.

Priscelle has posted that the Estimated Publishing Date for Book 13 (As yet not-officially named) was April 5th 2011
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Shecky on April 07, 2010, 06:31:37 PM
Priscelle has posted that the Estimated Publishing Date for Book 13 (As yet not-officially named) was April 5th 2011


Jim has proposed a name and Anne Sowards (his editor) tells me the name is publisher-approved. Awaiting official announcement. If it does turn out that his original title is what gets used, it is TEH AWSUM.
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Ink Slinger on April 07, 2010, 07:06:25 PM
Jim...why do you have to be so horribly wonderful?

All at the same time I love, hate, fear and respect you.  I think you made my brain explode.

But my question is this, will we find out where Maggie ends up?  And I ask, because I cried for twenty minutes dude. 
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Led Guardian on April 07, 2010, 09:36:18 PM
Jim has proposed a name and Anne Sowards (his editor) tells me the name is publisher-approved. Awaiting official announcement. If it does turn out that his original title is what gets used, it is TEH AWSUM.
I bet you know secrets about the next book that you are not telling us, you horrible person. You know of what I speak. :P
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: vultur on April 07, 2010, 11:38:19 PM
Since it's unlikely to be a plot point in the future due to events in Changes, I suppose it's an appropriate question for this thread: what is the true origin of the Red Court? Are they actually originally native to the Nevernever (and were a Nevernever "species" before they encountered humans) or did they begin as "altered" humans? If the former, were they different than the Rampires we know before they first encountered humans (and since then have copied human traits)?

And when did they originate/first encounter humanity? PG suggests the Red King is 4000 years old, but Changes says that Arianna is older than human written language (which would make her at least 5000+; Sumerian cuneiform writing originated sometime before 3000 BC) and that she was turned by the Red King - so is younger than him.
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: vultur on April 07, 2010, 11:41:40 PM
What the hell *is* Mouse? And mister...he's getting up in age for a regular cat.  IIRC Dresden'd had him for a while as of Storm Front which would be like 10 or 11 years ago...cats live like 15-20 years.

Mister was a kitten when Harry found him, 3 years before Storm Front. According to the timeline, Changes is 11-plus-a-little years after SF. So Mister is either 14 or 15 depending on when his birthday is.
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: paulWTAMU on April 07, 2010, 11:55:51 PM
swear to god, if he kills the pets I'm going to cry like a baby. Even if it's old age :(
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Landing on April 08, 2010, 12:05:00 AM
swear to god, if he kills the pets I'm going to cry like a baby. Even if it's old age :(

especially if its old age! that can be the sadist way of all!
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Neogenesis on April 08, 2010, 12:25:56 AM
Jim your sadistic. I salute you. I will be waiting for the preview chapter of the next book. The characters played out better than a psychologist could compose them. How do you sculpt them like that? Next up spoiler question:
(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: nthnclls on April 08, 2010, 01:39:17 AM
Do you need to have the anguished screams of your readers for nourishment, like plants need sunlight, or do you just enjoy them?
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Shecky on April 08, 2010, 01:41:41 AM
Do you need to have the anguished screams of your readers for nourishment, like plants need sunlight, or do you just enjoy them?

I think he needs them for nourishment but has become a gourmet connoisseur of the infinite variety of readerly pain and trauma.
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Dreadseeker on April 08, 2010, 02:16:05 AM
Is it possible that Harry will move to Kansas City after the events of Changes, sense you wanted him to be there in the first place?
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: nthnclls on April 08, 2010, 03:43:16 AM
I think he needs them for nourishment but has become a gourmet connoisseur of the infinite variety of readerly pain and trauma.

That explains it, then...
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Murphy's Stunt Double on April 08, 2010, 05:27:14 AM
Was what appears on page 286 of the hardback my 10,000 post nod?  ;)

Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: svb1972 on April 08, 2010, 04:54:43 PM
Was what appears on page 286 of the hardback my 10,000 post nod?  ;)



I squeeed like a little girl when I got to that part.

Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Murphy's Stunt Double on April 08, 2010, 06:40:59 PM
So it's not just my egomania kicking in to high gear?
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: svb1972 on April 08, 2010, 08:19:08 PM
Maybe it is..
but certainly it's the very first thought I had when I read that line.


I read it.. and then I went.. wait.. did jim just do a shout out to MSD.. and then I read it again to be sure.
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Shecky on April 09, 2010, 12:14:36 AM
Heh. The only way I'll ever be acknowledged in the text is if the first dwarf actually to be seen in the stories shows up and annoys the Creator; I've got a firm history of provoking long, exasperated explanations by Jim. ;D
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Murphy's Stunt Double on April 09, 2010, 01:06:12 AM
Heh... I can SOOOOOO see that happening!
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Shecky on April 09, 2010, 01:09:03 AM
He'd have a bolt of lightning hit the little bastard, then Sanya would shrug and say, "Sorry. This sort of thing just happens around me."
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Murphy's Stunt Double on April 09, 2010, 01:13:31 AM
ROFLMAO!!! Don't give the devil any ideas. Let him work for it!  ;) :D
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Shecky on April 09, 2010, 01:14:10 AM
ROFLMAO!!! Don't give the devil any ideas. Let him work for it!  ;) :D

Why? The ideas he comes up with always end up cooler than the ones we make, anyway.  ::)
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Wizard H on April 09, 2010, 01:22:04 AM
Hey a dwarf isn't out of the picture Harry mentions a Svartalf in Changes and I assume that is taken from Svartálfar, which translates to dark elf or black elf, but they possess many of what's considered to be dwarven attributes.  I know of a couple of fantasy writers who use variation of the name Svartálfar to describe dwarves.  Maybe we'll find out th craftsman was named Shec Kee. :D
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Murphy's Stunt Double on April 09, 2010, 01:24:05 AM
Why? The ideas he comes up with always end up cooler than the ones we make, anyway.  ::)

This is true!
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Beckett6669 on April 09, 2010, 10:12:42 AM
*Takes out my Blow horn.* WHEN IS THE DRAGON'S GOING TO STAGE ANOTHER COMEBACK? *Shuts off the blow horn and sits.* No but seriously. We get a glimpse of Ferrovax a Dragon in the Roman Legion armor in Grave Peril. I'm really curious your take on the Dragon's in Dresden's world.
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: the neurovore of Zur-En-Aargh on April 09, 2010, 04:14:02 PM
*Takes out my Blow horn.* WHEN IS THE DRAGON'S GOING TO STAGE ANOTHER COMEBACK? *Shuts off the blow horn and sits.* No but seriously. We get a glimpse of Ferrovax a Dragon in the Roman Legion armor in Grave Peril. I'm really curious your take on the Dragon's in Dresden's world.

I think Jim has said "in the Big Apocalyptic Trilogy" in response to that question before.
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: mawalee on April 09, 2010, 09:54:16 PM
How come
(click to show/hide)
knew that Telling Arianna about Maggie will lead to
(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Analise on April 09, 2010, 10:08:22 PM
How come
(click to show/hide)
knew that Telling Arianna about Maggie will lead to
(click to show/hide)


Uh, I'm not Jim (obviously) and I'm just speculating here but:

He didn't.

He put out where Maggie was, assuming Arianna would take her. Then he knew that Susan and Harry would move Heaven and Earth to rescue her. He may have even known about the bloodline curse but either way... At the very least, he would have had someone (Harry) who'd do anything and everything in his power to take down whoever had his daughter which at least meant Martin could hope the Red King would die or some large chunk of the nobility. Then the bloodline curse comes up, and he sees how he can subvert it for his own purpose and ends up revealing himself at just the right moment, trusting that Harry is intelligent enough to see what to do (that comment from Susan about Harry seeing 'everything' eventually comes into play here, I think) and....ta da, Red Court Vampire insta-death.
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Deviation on April 10, 2010, 08:56:38 AM
One of the problems I have with reading series of books is that the characters tend to become static after a while.  They stop growing, developing, changing, and that's when it gets boring.  How do you keep your characters continually developing for such a long series while simultaneously making sure that they still remain who they are?  I'm placing primary emphasis of this question in regards to their personalities I suppose (although physical changes effect that as well obviously).

Thanks.  I can't wait for the next book!
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: magical_liopleurodon on April 10, 2010, 10:06:01 PM
Does Oberon, emperor of the fairies, fit into your mythos at all?
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Deviation on April 11, 2010, 01:40:43 AM
Will Toot become a full-sized sidhe by the end of the series?
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Icecream on April 11, 2010, 01:24:09 PM
How come
(click to show/hide)
knew that Telling Arianna about Maggie will lead to
(click to show/hide)

oooh. i just reread over those pages , because i sped through it the first time. It's explained on page 416 of changes

(click to show/hide)
and so on.

OK. so for my question. probably won't get answered but I'll just put it out there.

In WN Harry is talking to Luccio at camp kaboom, and she mentions how she hasn't had to deal with her monthly cycle in like 140 years i think. her being what ~200 years old would imply that she hit menopause around the normal mortal age , which also means at about the mortal age she was no longer able to have children.

but at the siging in CA on April 9/10th http://www.youtube.com/user/Dresdenfiler#p/u/1/96KFFdwq6Gg at about 6:40

(click to show/hide)

so this is a new bit of info , because female wizard fertility has been brought up a few times.

so what does this mean ?
-All female wizards can have children alot older than vanillas?
-
(click to show/hide)
-or Maybe something happened to Luccio when she was younger?
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: finnmckool on April 12, 2010, 12:36:54 AM
Yeah...I have a question..

What did I ever do to you except like your books and give you my money?

You're gonna leave me hanging on THIS cliff for a year?

Now pardon me while I walk away and rampantly speculate in a dark room as I'm the only one of my friends who's read this book yet so I can't say a darned thing.

Stupid authors. Jerks.
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Shecky on April 12, 2010, 01:42:07 AM
Yeah...I have a question..

What did I ever do to you except like your books and give you my money?

You're gonna leave me hanging on THIS cliff for a year?

Now pardon me while I walk away and rampantly speculate in a dark room as I'm the only one of my friends who's read this book yet so I can't say a darned thing.

Stupid authors. Jerks.

Listen closely: Jim is THE Skavis. His lifeforce is sustained by our wails of anguish and despair. ;D
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: finnmckool on April 12, 2010, 02:32:02 AM
Pft. Figures.
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: graogrim on April 12, 2010, 03:38:51 AM
Throughout the series, most of the various Laws of Magic have been violated. And Harry himself has closely skirted some of them. Either way, it's always made personal for him. There's been plenty of killing with magic to go around throughout the series, starting with Storm Front. We've seen a story about the transformation of others, in Fool Moon. And, of course, Harry now knows what it's like to be transformed into a dog--oh, excuse me, Lea: a hound.  Molly has a pretty intimate familiarity with transgressing into the mind of another in Proven Guilty and even more recently besides. Let's not forget Small Favor or Turn Coat, either. We don't see much in the way of enthralling during the course of the books except by historical reference in Summer Knight, but for Harry, that's History with a capital H. We've got plenty of examples of reaching beyond the borders of life in Dead Beat. They beat down his door, shot arrows at him, and left really big footprints while giving him a ride. Possibly we're going to see even more of that reaching Real Soon Now. There have been mostly only little tidbits here and there regarding the seeking of that which lies beyond the Outer Gates, but it seems like it's only a matter of time before Harry will once more have to contend with He Who Walks Behind, and perhaps worse.

That leaves one final law that strikes me as particularly interesting--and particularly challenging to make a good story for that doesn't come across clichéd--which brings me to my question:

Will we ever actually see a story where Harry must do battle with those swimming against the currents of time?

(Or perhaps we already have, and just don't know it yet)
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Razzabeth on April 13, 2010, 01:08:00 AM
Can we please have more humor/comic relief?? Or can you let us know if more humor will be present in the coming books? A simple, non-spoilery yes/no would suffice.

The first couple books were pretty lighthearted and there was lots of jokes to balance out the bad stuff. I notice the level of humor has fallen noticeably to be replaced by action/drama. I realize that serious stuff has to happen in order for characters to evolve and become more realistic, but I really miss the more humorous style that was present in the beginning.  :'(

Just so you know, I went through the arduous process of setting up an account here just so I could post this one thing!
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Jamamma on April 13, 2010, 06:13:55 PM
This might be coming out of left field here, but...

By chance, Jim, did you ever read R. Karl Largent's Ancients?

And were the monsters in any way inspiration for your Uber Ghouls?
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: devnull on April 14, 2010, 07:38:19 PM
In Laurel K Hamilton's series there is a part of the back story in which the supernatural is brought irrevocably to the human race's attention (Faeries applying for asylum/vampires applying for human rights). Is this type of scenario something you have thought of incorporating into your series?

Also - Are there any governments aware of the supernatural in the dresden-verse?   
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: magic penguin on April 14, 2010, 07:53:16 PM
Quote
Was what appears on page 286 of the hardback my 10,000 post nod?  Wink


I missed that on my first read.
was going really fast to see what would happen next.
2nd read I pickup more details this time
3rd read is better

congrats to you. ;D ;D ;D :D :D ::) :-*
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: magic penguin on April 14, 2010, 08:06:18 PM
Quote
Listen closely: Jim is THE Skavis. His life force is sustained by our wails of anguish and despair. Grin


Then he must be super super strong and filled with energy from our anguish...misery...suffering....woe

HEY  MAYBE IF WE ALL RALLY AND BE JOYFUL OVER SOMETHING ELSE  HE'LL WEAKEN AND BE FORCED TO
RELEASE THE BOOK A MONTH OR TWO EARLIER..

 BE JOYOUS OUT THERE ALL OF YOU
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: sscout on April 15, 2010, 12:14:19 AM
I have a question about the beta list, how can I join?

I don't want money or spoilers or to know something ahead of schedule, I just want to help get the books out faster. I proofed Brooke London's (http://www.facebook.com/brookelondon (http://www.facebook.com/brookelondon)) Pitch Dark in about 1 week and caught a bunch of mistakes / typos her editors missed (didn't get paid either :P). I'm pretty sure he hasn't heard of this but I offered the same to Patrick Rothfuss, who last I checked keeps rewriting parts of book 2 of The Kingkiller Chronicles .

I've been editing / proofing 'for fun' since I started reading Enid Blyton around age 10. I've been editing / proofing profesionally since around 1997-8, mostly in spanish but lately mostly in english. The only large samples of my work are mostly translations or I'd put some of it up on the web.

Other than including it on my writer's resume I don't even know how I could possibly profit from doing this, unless someone recommended me to a publisher for online work. But I love the Dresden Files and Codex Alera, so I'm volunteering. That's all :)

sscout@gmail.com <-- I'll be more than happy to answer any questions here.


Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: LogicMouseLives on April 15, 2010, 12:29:23 AM
Hey, Jim!

Just missed you live on BBB this afternoon. I got home from work an hour after you wrapped up, with questions still burning in my head.

You have no idea how much of a pain it was for me to get back onto your site, when my old account --LogicMouse-- got all messed up, but I set up a new e-mail just for you, you bastard, so I hope you answer at least one of my questions, even if it's only with your sing-song-y tag line.   ;D

So anyway, on with the questions.

1: Who do you think you're kidding? I mean
(click to show/hide)


2: What happened to the migranes? You made a big deal of them having gone on for ~six months at the beginning of Turn Coat, but there's not a word on the subject in Changes. Did it just fall off the edge of your plate, or was the omission deliberate for some reason?

(and oh, yeah--first post, sorta!)

LML

P.S. And no, folks, Jim can't be a Skavis--if he was why would he work so hard to make us HAPPY!?! I swear, even when tears are streaming down my face, I'm still grinning so hard my cheeks hurt. Thanks, JB!
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Bassfraser on April 15, 2010, 01:51:25 AM
Was what appears on page 286 of the hardback my 10,000 post nod?  ;)



Make it to 20,000 and get in the next book, too  ;)
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Shecky on April 15, 2010, 02:29:20 AM
P.S. And no, folks, Jim can't be a Skavis--if he was why would he work so hard to make us HAPPY!?! I swear, even when tears are streaming down my face, I'm still grinning so hard my cheeks hurt. Thanks, JB!

Fine, so he's a lust child of a Skavis and a Raith - we despair and we LOVE it.
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Murphy's Stunt Double on April 15, 2010, 04:25:07 AM
Make it to 20,000 and get in the next book, too  ;)

Heh. Wouldn't that be the coolest thing!

But I'm satisfied. Mostly. I've gotten a very special, personalized card from a dearly beloved friend signed by Jim. Got to chat with Jim on the phone at last year's KC signing while Aine and Themo and Mystic and Bookie and others were hanging out with him as it all wound down. Another friend has a bookbag waiting for me that she had Jim sign for me, and I probably fennegled my way through his subconscious into this book.

The only thing left is for me to meet him in person and shake his hand, really. *Hopes the action performs some necromancy on my own dead writer's hand.*
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: the neurovore of Zur-En-Aargh on April 15, 2010, 03:45:15 PM
Make it to 20,000 and get in the next book, too  ;)

I got the making it to 20,000 covered.

My handle's a Terry Pratchett allusion, though, so not really Tuckerisable in quite the same way.
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Murphy's Stunt Double on April 15, 2010, 04:37:00 PM
I got the making it to 20,000 covered.


Rub it in, why don't you?  :-*
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: the neurovore of Zur-En-Aargh on April 15, 2010, 05:08:45 PM
Rub it in, why don't you?  :-*

I can't rub anything in until you get within arm's reach, dear.
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Murphy's Stunt Double on April 15, 2010, 05:31:08 PM
Rub THAT in too!  >:(
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Bassfraser on April 15, 2010, 05:37:29 PM
I can't rub anything in until you get within arm's reach, dear.

It that a short joke?  :P
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Bassfraser on April 15, 2010, 06:24:29 PM
I got the making it to 20,000 covered.

My handle's a Terry Pratchett allusion, though, so not really Tuckerisable in quite the same way.

Hmmm... not sure how to sneak that into the next book.  Have to leave that up to the Mad Genius.
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: the neurovore of Zur-En-Aargh on April 15, 2010, 06:59:14 PM
It that a short joke?  :P

Nah, it was a "geography's a bitch" allusion.  I have more respect for my hide that to make short jokes at MSD; for those, we have Shecky.
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Bassfraser on April 15, 2010, 07:04:08 PM
Nah, it was a "geography's a bitch" allusion.  I have more respect for my hide that to make short jokes at MSD; for those, we have Shecky.

Oh, good.  With an arena to watch them in when said jokes are made?
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Drizzt VS Kyler on April 16, 2010, 12:58:38 AM
286 ??? what are you  tlking about on it.
know its personal and against forum rules but humor me.

to Jim your awesome and i trust any direction you take this book. im your new fan base not a RPG player not over 18 nor a nerd, geek or any variation of. i meen NO OFFENCE TO ANY ONE READING THIS. love your books keep it up.
ps hope he is the winter knight for a while
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Murphy's Stunt Double on April 16, 2010, 05:20:01 AM
286 ??? what are you  tlking about on it.
know its personal and against forum rules but humor me.


Drizzt, if you go to the "You know you're too into Dresden Files when..." thread, the explanation is all written out there under spoiler tags.

In fact, here: http://www.jimbutcheronline.com/bb/index.php/topic,14787.790.html (http://www.jimbutcheronline.com/bb/index.php/topic,14787.790.html)

PS - I'm not sure how it's against forum rules...??
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Nimue on April 16, 2010, 08:56:28 PM
Are the Mendozas mentioned in 'Changes' related to Bony Tony Mendoza from 'Dead Beat'?
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Zelnik on April 16, 2010, 11:09:26 PM
Here is a question

is Changes the last book in the dresden files series?
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: seekmore on April 16, 2010, 11:36:41 PM
Here is a question

is Changes the last book in the dresden files series?

No, Changes is about the halfway point of the series. That makes around twelves more books.

The next book is Ghost Story and is supposed to come out next April.

There is a collection of short stories, called Side Jobs, slated to come out this fall. It also includes a novella called Aftermath, which is Murphy's POV and set 45 minutes after the end of Changes.
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: ۞†Grey Warden†۞ on April 17, 2010, 04:41:33 AM
Guys the last time he answered on of these was in 07

But just in case.

1. What does dresden order at Burger King?
2.Why do you hate us?
3. How many times has Harry died according to you as of changes?
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Poneglyph on April 17, 2010, 06:19:16 AM
2.Why do you hate us?

I don't think he hate us. He just enjoy our suffering. Actually, causing small agonies to others is a way of love too.

Or I like to think of it like that.
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Bassfraser on April 17, 2010, 07:43:39 PM
2.Why do you hate us?

Jim is kind of like the Skavis, he feeds off of our wails of anguish when we read things like the last book of changes.  He doesn't hate us, he needs us.  And our wails.
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: mastetwindu46q on April 18, 2010, 07:30:15 PM
If there was a fight between all people with M names, who would survive and would Mister be among them?
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Mooman on April 18, 2010, 07:34:48 PM
Here's a question: Why aren't vampire predator spirits left at the door when they cross a threshold? I mean, if the human part of Thomas can die with the demon part staying alive, why not the other way around?
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Striker83 on April 19, 2010, 02:10:36 AM
Will the original summer mother appear in the future books?
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Silvanya on April 19, 2010, 06:04:49 AM
Screams~

Oh my gods! Jim you horrible genious of a man! I kind of hate you while I, at the same time, worship the ground you walk on and light a candle in reverence to your Awesome.

Oh my dear goddess. Thank the gods for these boards or I would have gone crazy! I just finished the book, no one is around to talk to about it and oh my gods...

I think my head was about to explode from teh amount of crazy I was trying to hold in- as well as all the screaming. I am pretty sure, there at the end, i heard the howls of a million nerds as my soul had a sezuire.

Thank gods i read through this thread before I started posting- because I was literally about to FREAK OUT! It's just a halfway point, I think most of my crazy was banished with this knowlege- as well as after a frantic internet search that nearly lit my computer on fire that assured me a new book was coming.... In A YEAR!

Argh! I think I need to go molest someone to get all this excess energy out.

Takes a shaky breath~ I am a little better now.

So question- WHY ARE YOU SUCH A TEASE, JIM?

That is all.
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: ranlynn on April 19, 2010, 07:46:29 PM
Hey Jim, saw you at the 'Changes' signing in SoCal & forgot to ask you about this.

Way back in 'Death Masks (??) Shiro mentioned a 'Jade Court' of vampires. Will we ever get to 'see' them? All we got was that one little reference & I've been wondering about them ever since.
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: the neurovore of Zur-En-Aargh on April 19, 2010, 07:56:10 PM
Way back in 'Death Masks (??) Shiro mentioned a 'Jade Court' of vampires. Will we ever get to 'see' them? All we got was that one little reference & I've been wondering about them ever since.

I think we have a comment from Jim elsewhere on the site to the effect that we won't see them before the big final trilogy. (Which is not a promise that we will see them then.)
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Maro_Shioa on April 20, 2010, 08:59:13 PM
This is just out of curiosity, but can you tell whether or not butters will find some powers? Because i kinda like that he is becoming more major character, bt has to survive on just wits, not police powers, or sword, or magic, or any such thing.
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: knnn on April 20, 2010, 09:07:13 PM
I think we have a comment from Jim elsewhere on the site to the effect that we won't see them before the big final trilogy. (Which is not a promise that we will see them then.)


Though the "Jim is Lazy" postulate suggests that there is a reasonable chance they will make it in.
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: the neurovore of Zur-En-Aargh on April 21, 2010, 02:56:03 AM
Though the "Jim is Lazy" postulate suggests that there is a reasonable chance they will make it in.

Maybe. Otoh, it does seem, from things he says at signings, that the DV is a lot bigger in his head than anything we'll get to see in the books, and sometimes an incidental detail may be just a cigar.
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: alaskeith on April 21, 2010, 04:03:27 AM
First of all I Loved changes! yes I can capitalize Loved if I want I am not an author.  Can't wait for book 13 although I was spooked at the end of changes a bit.  Is Harry dead?? apparently he survives, but it kinda makes a case for him to get outa being the White Knight if you think about it for a minute. Just asking.  Love the series, one of my all time faves.  Thanks
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Sigma77 on April 21, 2010, 04:24:01 AM
If the nails of the cross became this crazy...well, what about the Spear of Destiny?
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: jjmcdonald on April 21, 2010, 03:28:13 PM
Actually, I think that Changes did what I wanted. It effectively (and very nicely) Ended the Dersden Files.
Fidelacchius will claim Murphy, now that she is "retired". The Series arch of Susan was ended as it was started, with the Red Court. And Harry ended the war that he started. In the beginning, he wrestles with the question "Is one life worth a War?". His answer started the war with the Reds. Which went badly, cost many lives, almost destroyed the White Council, and caused lots of heartache. In the end, he answers the question "Is one life worth peace?". And he delivers on that too. But he does not do that with his own life. He uses that of a woman he had loved.
Harry is over Susan before Changes. (Laura noted that when he was no longer poison to her). So this decision was not as angst ridden as we would hope. Nor was the decision to place his daughter in foster care with someone who he would never know. Clearly he realizes that he is no person to act to raise the daughter he helped to create. He can only hope that she either has NO magical ability, or that no one ever discovers her parentage. If it does express itself, Hopefully the Paranet will catch her before she becomes an unfortunate victim of neglect. She will obviously never know her history (for her own good). How do you say to a lovely young woman in years to come "Your mother who you never knew was killed to end a war"?

Many others have suffered because of Harry (Murphy, Michael Carpenter), and some have grown (Lash) and along the way he has helped save others. (Molly and Thomas). Some for a short time. Some for a longer time.
Interesting that Mouse chose Harry, not the other way around. The nature of the Foo Dog is something that Harry really never understands. Last seen with orders to "Protect Molly", it will be interesting how he helps to guide and support the new young Wizard.

As to Bob. Here is a real twist. The person most likely to inherit him is Molly. Which will be her undoing. Too young to really believe that she is not going to suffer consequences, she will find it irresistable to explore all that Bob can give to her. And Bob can give to her a Lot. She probably won't exhibit the maturity to realize how dangerous Bob really is. And if Luccio or McCoy discover it, either of them will eagerly dispose of the danger she would represent. Those people are NOT her friends.

Molly's wisest choice would be to engage with the Gatekeeper, and ask to become his apprentice. He (like her) heals both bodies and minds. Elements of her strongest power she should learn to use and grow with good sense. Perhaps, like Harry's History, we could see books written about her as the next arc of the Dresden Files.

So we have the end of a gifted drifter who is lucky, smart, and will leave behind a interitance of 2 Swords and a talking (to some people) skull. He was more lucky then skilled by all accounts. He played above his weight, Fought the good fight, Won more then he lost. and had some peculiar associations along the way.

SO the game is who will inherit the relationships, knowledge and few items of value which he leaves behind? And what will become of them?  And of the people who were key to so many pieces of this little Dresden Universe. That is the challenge for Jim now.

I think that is the subject for all future books.

Good Bye Harry. God's Rest to you.
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Led Guardian on April 21, 2010, 07:34:31 PM
Jjmcdonald, you do realize that Harry's story is not over yet, right?
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: sleepdeprived38 on April 21, 2010, 09:26:38 PM
Actually, I think that Changes did what I wanted. It effectively (and very nicely) Ended the Dersden Files.

No.  Just no.

I will not accept the end of the Dresden Files with anything less than a signed, notarized letter from Jim Butcher, in his handwriting that says, "Yes, guys, it's over."  Until we get that there will be more Dresden.

Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: draganmathair on April 21, 2010, 09:26:49 PM
Priscelle has posted that the Estimated Publishing Date for Book 13 (As yet not-officially named) was April 5th 2011


I am torn between being glad Jim is taking time to do a good job (so many authors don't, and they suck)...and REALLY NOT WANTING to wait another year.  Hmph.  Well, it gives me time to reread.
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: svb1972 on April 21, 2010, 09:29:03 PM
I am torn between being glad Jim is taking time to do a good job (so many authors don't, and they suck)...and REALLY NOT WANTING to wait another year.  Hmph.  Well, it gives me time to reread.

He's not taking time.
Book 13 is already a couple of chapters in.  He'll probably have it finished by july at the latest.

His Publisher won't put out a Dresden book more than once a year.
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: draganmathair on April 21, 2010, 09:30:39 PM
He's not taking time.
Book 13 is already a couple of chapters in.  He'll probably have it finished by july at the latest.

His Publisher won't put out a Dresden book more than once a year.


Interesting to know, thanks.  Which still sucks for us.  Darn publishers.
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: tiny[but]fierce on April 21, 2010, 09:45:00 PM

Then he must be super super strong and filled with energy from our anguish...misery...suffering....woe

HEY  MAYBE IF WE ALL RALLY AND BE JOYFUL OVER SOMETHING ELSE  HE'LL WEAKEN AND BE FORCED TO
RELEASE THE BOOK A MONTH OR TWO EARLIER..

 BE JOYOUS OUT THERE ALL OF YOU


While I wouldn't mind Jim publishing the book earlier, I have to admit, I love having it published in April, as it has for the past few years. It feels like Jim is unofficially acknowledging it as my present, since my birthday's on April 9th :)
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: tiny[but]fierce on April 21, 2010, 09:47:02 PM

1: Who do you think you're kidding? I mean
(click to show/hide)


2: What happened to the migranes? You made a big deal of them having gone on for ~six months at the beginning of Turn Coat, but there's not a word on the subject in Changes. Did it just fall off the edge of your plate, or was the omission deliberate for some reason?



THANK YOU FOR ASKING THIS!!! I swear, if someone didn't, I was going to. ::walks off muttering::
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: tiny[but]fierce on April 21, 2010, 10:16:57 PM
Here's a question: Aside from that brief glimpse (not even a glimpse really) of her in SK, is Titania ever going to make herself known the way Mab constantly does? It just occurred to me when I reread Small Favor that we've met all of the Sidhe Queens except, officially, for her.

Another question. Meryl Trollgirl is gone, and Fix and Lily are Summer's Knight and Lady -- what ever happened to the fourth person in their group, Ace?
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: ۞†Grey Warden†۞ on April 22, 2010, 01:23:32 AM
While I wouldn't mind Jim publishing the book earlier, I have to admit, I love having it published in April, as it has for the past few years. It feels like Jim is unofficially acknowledging it as my present, since my birthday's on April 9th :)

Me too mines the 17th
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: tiny[but]fierce on April 22, 2010, 01:42:17 AM
Me too mines the 17th

Happy belated birthday, then! :D
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Blampira on April 22, 2010, 02:02:28 AM
I thought that Murphy lost her P-90 in Lake Michigan at the end of Small Favor (thanks to razor-blade Dierdre}, but here we are two books later and Murph has her P-90 at her side as she goes along with Harry & Co to save Maggie from the Reds.

So my question is:  did she get another P-90 / or is this a book flub / or did Harry use his magical skills and 'find' Murph's gun for her at some point 'off-page' and if so will we get the backstory on it?
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Murphy's Stunt Double on April 22, 2010, 04:58:21 AM
Yep, Murphy's P-90 in Sm Fwas the only one in the Universe, and Harry had to fashion one for her out of clay, then magic it into existence between books. You caught it!  ;) :D
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: the neurovore of Zur-En-Aargh on April 22, 2010, 03:45:11 PM
Here's a question: Aside from that brief glimpse (not even a glimpse really) of her in SK, is Titania ever going to make herself known the way Mab constantly does?

I think Jim answered this at a signing a while back. (The answer being "no".)

Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: MitchellTF on April 22, 2010, 04:04:20 PM
Here's a question: Aside from that brief glimpse (not even a glimpse really) of her in SK, is Titania ever going to make herself known the way Mab constantly does? It just occurred to me when I reread Small Favor that we've met all of the Sidhe Queens except, officially, for her.

Another question. Meryl Trollgirl is gone, and Fix and Lily are Summer's Knight and Lady -- what ever happened to the fourth person in their group, Ace?

RPG gave some info on Ace. Harry has no idea, Ace just fell off the radar. I'll have to reread, it might be that he's dead...
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Poneglyph on April 22, 2010, 06:27:39 PM
RPG gave some info on Ace. Harry has no idea, Ace just fell off the radar. I'll have to reread, it might be that he's dead...

Ace is dead *In joke*. Ah, I really hate Butcher for using that cool name in that character :'(.

Hmmm... Now that you're bringing him to question, I wonder if he's going to come back in the next books?

That "I'm a lazy writer" thing is making me paranoid. I mean, more.
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: the neurovore of Zur-En-Aargh on April 22, 2010, 06:38:53 PM
Ace is dead *In joke*. Ah, I really hate Butcher for using that cool name in that character .

Jim did say, when asked if we were going to see Ace again, "what makes you think you haven't ?"

I guess he was the driver in the hit and run at the beginning of PG and possibly behind the carbomb in WN.
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Dimitri on April 22, 2010, 07:00:59 PM
Here's a question: What happens if one of the Nickleheads pick up a second coin? Do they have two fallen angels in their head? Is there like a "No Vacancies" sign? And if they pick it up for just a moment or two then drop it do they get a shadow like Harry/Lash? I can't imagine the ackwardness.  :o
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Poneglyph on April 22, 2010, 07:08:06 PM
Quote
Jim did say, when asked if we were going to see Ace again, "what makes you think you haven't ?"

I guess he was the driver in the hit and run at the beginning of PG and possibly behind the carbomb in WN.

And maybe he even
(click to show/hide)
.

Jim is really cruel. That kind of answer... I think he's making some kind of experiment to see how many theories we can make of his books.
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: tiny[but]fierce on April 23, 2010, 02:09:43 AM
Jim did say, when asked if we were going to see Ace again, "what makes you think you haven't ?"

I guess he was the driver in the hit and run at the beginning of PG and possibly behind the carbomb in WN.

If I could ask, when did he say this? Was it recently, or in the press releases for the other books? And if he is still alive, your theories are freaking awesome, and I wholeheartedly agree. The little creep probably got pulled in as a BC operative.
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: the neurovore of Zur-En-Aargh on April 23, 2010, 03:16:20 PM
If I could ask, when did he say this? Was it recently, or in the press releases for the other books?

It was at a signing, and pre-Changes being out; I can't recall exactly when.
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: CWsCorner on April 23, 2010, 03:18:48 PM
I was wondering about Mab's rage.  Why was she so angry and if her condition stems from Harry's actions at Arctis Tor?  Also, has her rage been placated since Harry became the Winter Knight?
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: svb1972 on April 23, 2010, 03:20:51 PM
Why does Mab have to be pissed off at Harry?
She's got plenty of other things that could have made her angry.  Harry is not the center of Mab's universe.
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: the neurovore of Zur-En-Aargh on April 23, 2010, 03:22:27 PM
I was wondering about Mab's rage.  Why was she so angry and if her condition stems from Harry's actions at Arctis Tor?

Jim has said that it's because she is wounded.  We do not know how, or why.  It may be worth pointing out that the first visible sign of Mab's self-control slipping seems to be her response to the mention of Kemmler in DB, predating the events at Arctis Tor in PG.
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: 2ndsly on April 23, 2010, 04:01:18 PM
What is Harry's color?
If you don't know what I mean, look towards my sig.

Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: svb1972 on April 23, 2010, 04:02:33 PM
he's Green and Red
Mostly Red
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Durwen on April 23, 2010, 04:03:48 PM
I'd say red with a splash of blue.
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: ranlynn on April 23, 2010, 07:27:07 PM
Interesting to know, thanks.  Which still sucks for us.  Darn publishers.

There's a collection of Jim's DF short stories coming out later this year.

Barnes & Noble has it for pre-order (hardback rel Oct 26, 2010). It's supposed to have all (or most) of the DF shorts published seperately in other anthologies & the two on his website.

At the signing I went to he also said it would also include a 'novella' from Murphys POV that picks up about 30-45 minutes after the last scene in 'Changes'.
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: tiny[but]fierce on April 23, 2010, 11:26:39 PM
There's a collection of Jim's DF short stories coming out later this year.

Barnes & Noble has it for pre-order (hardback rel Oct 26, 2010). It's supposed to have all (or most) of the DF shorts published seperately in other anthologies & the two on his website.

At the signing I went to he also said it would also include a 'novella' from Murphys POV that picks up about 30-45 minutes after the last scene in 'Changes'.


http://booktionary.blogspot.com/2010/02/news-jim-butchers-dresden-files-short.html (http://booktionary.blogspot.com/2010/02/news-jim-butchers-dresden-files-short.html)

:) :) :) :)
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Striker83 on April 24, 2010, 01:09:20 AM
When were the Old Ones cast out, before humanity or did we already exist?
And by whom?
 
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Veloc1ty on April 24, 2010, 07:42:16 PM
was Harry's father a vanilla mortal? or was he something more? u said harry had the power to fight the outsiders, well no other wizard has that power, why does he have it? he didnt get it from his mothers side? and we know very little about his father plus maggie dresden had a knack for being involved with dangerous induviduals, maybe his father was an outsider or demonic figure in the guise of a human?
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Blampira on April 24, 2010, 09:58:06 PM
was Harry's father a vanilla mortal? or was he something more? u said harry had the power to fight the outsiders, well no other wizard has that power, why does he have it? he didnt get it from his mothers side? and we know very little about his father plus maggie dresden had a knack for being involved with dangerous induviduals, maybe his father was an outsider or demonic figure in the guise of a human?

How far have you read into the series?  Harry's potential to wield power over Outsiders - and how it came about {to some small degree} - is discussed by Lash/Harry in White Night.

Malcolm Dresden was vanilla mortal.
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Durwen on April 24, 2010, 10:25:43 PM
How far have you read into the series?  Harry's potential to wield power over Outsiders - and how it came about {to some small degree} - is discussed by Lash/Harry in White Night.

Malcolm Dresden was vanilla mortal.

Malcom was vanilla, no doubt about it. But he might come from some über awesome bloodline.

I get the feeling that Maggie LeFay engineered Harry's birth to the last detail.
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: draganmathair on April 26, 2010, 07:22:20 PM
Happy belated birthday, then! :D

And I'm April 11--it is a great month to have a birthday.
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: tiny[but]fierce on April 26, 2010, 07:24:59 PM
And I'm April 11--it is a great month to have a birthday.

It truly is. Especially since I have the excuse of a Dresden book in April to look forward to.

Does anyone know if we will be seeing Tera West again? I'd actually really like to see her again :(
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: the neurovore of Zur-En-Aargh on April 26, 2010, 08:02:14 PM
When were the Old Ones cast out, before humanity or did we already exist?
And by whom?

Or is that whole story pure myth with no basis in DV history ?
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Bassfraser on April 27, 2010, 06:23:22 PM

Does anyone know if we will be seeing Tera West again? I'd actually really like to see her again :(

I think I remember Jim saying that we do.  Anyone else remember that?
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Murphy's Stunt Double on April 27, 2010, 06:32:10 PM
*raises hand*
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Bassfraser on April 27, 2010, 09:48:16 PM
*raises hand*

Alright! *High 5*
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: tiny[but]fierce on April 28, 2010, 01:58:52 AM
I think I remember Jim saying that we do.  Anyone else remember that?

Woohoo!
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: laura118b on April 28, 2010, 05:14:17 PM
He just answered this in the bittenbybooks q&a.  He said he was thinking a later book  but it may get bumped up to 13 depending on how the story goes.
Quote
ANSWERS FROM - JIM BUTCHER — April 14, 2010 @ 2:29 pm
"I seem to remember at a Q&A a few years ago, you said Tera West would be showing up in Book 13 aka Ghost Story. Is this still happening, or has her character been shuffled down the line a bit due to the change in total number of case file books?"
My first answer is "bump her down a couple." But on the other hand, it might be interesting to see her again in this book.
We'll see what happens.
Thanks to Persephone for transcribing the answers to the Q&A thread :D
http://www.jimbutcheronline.com/bb/index.php/topic,11734.340.html
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: tiny[but]fierce on April 28, 2010, 08:56:37 PM
He just answered this in the bittenbybooks q&a.  He said he was thinking a later book  but it may get bumped up to 13 depending on how the story goes. Thanks to Persephone for transcribing the answers to the Q&A thread :D
http://www.jimbutcheronline.com/bb/index.php/topic,11734.340.html

Weee!!! I personally always liked Tera :)

Quote
"Put some clothes on, you weird, yellow-eyed, table-dancing, werewolf-training, cryptic, stare-me-right-in-the-eyes-and-don't-even-blink wench."

Hee!! :D
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Niccos Shadow on April 29, 2010, 02:57:33 PM
In Grave Peril while going to rescue Susan and Justine from Bianca, Harry crosses through to the Nevernever and states/writes/narrates it as looking just like his apartment on the 'other side'.

In Changes, Bob mentions he should have found out what was on the 'other side' from there years ago and
(click to show/hide)

So, when did the change take place in the Nevernever? Or, if it had always been as described in Changes, what is the difference in circumstance that I'm missing?

Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Murphy's Stunt Double on April 29, 2010, 04:20:55 PM
Quite possibly, the difference is
(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: TFury on April 29, 2010, 09:52:38 PM
I've wondered that too, and my theory was that, possibly, Bob specifically led Harry into non-Fae areas when they're going through the NeverNever, and that Harry didn't know what was in the Fae across from his house, because he was afraid of Lea.

Or, that GhostChicago place may not have been the NeverNever proper, but rather another demesne-type area. 
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Kebran on May 01, 2010, 09:48:41 AM
For Ghost Story it is mentioned it will start 1 year or so after Changes. Will any back story will be provided to fill in some of the gaps from the conclusion of Changes from Harry's POV?  I know Aftermath starts about 45 minutes after the conclusion of Changes but it to be from Murphy's POV, which will be completely different.
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: ramrod47 on May 02, 2010, 08:20:09 PM
Jim has said on numerous occaisions that he didn't plan out Harry's love life. I'm however wondering if he did plan out Susan's part, afterall her relationship to Harry is very important to the plot of Changes. Would this mean that he lied about the relationship thing? Is this just for Susan? If anyone has any ideas please let me know.
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: ramrod47 on May 04, 2010, 04:47:42 AM
I have another question,

Quote
I know Aftermath starts about 45 minutes after the conclusion of Changes but it to be from Murphy's POV, which will be completely different.

Does it actually start 45 min after the conclusion of Changes or 45 min after Murphy leaves? Has either been confirmed?
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Shecky on May 04, 2010, 10:34:40 AM
Jim said 45 minutes after Changes. Sounds clear to me.
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: tiny[but]fierce on May 04, 2010, 12:37:27 PM
I have another question,

Does it actually start 45 min after the conclusion of Changes or 45 min after Murphy leaves? Has either been confirmed?

Harry spent nearly an hour (forty minutes, and then about ten just slacking) waiting for Murphy to come back at the end of Changes. Therefore, forty-five minutes after Changes, Murphy has come back at this point, and has discovered what's happened. Jim has stated that the first sentence of Aftermath is
(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Stark on May 04, 2010, 01:26:42 PM
What happened to ThreeEye?

I recognize that the source got nuked, but there ought to be at least a crapton of ThreeEye junkies running about with WICKED cravings and crazy  nightmares. At the very least the sheer torture of withdrawal would attract a metric crapton on Skavises. Skavi. Skavisises. Whatever.

So what happened to the drug addicts?
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: svb1972 on May 04, 2010, 01:32:32 PM
Marcone helped them out by lowering the cost of Heroin for a while.
It doesn't help with the crazy, but it does make them forget the world existed for a while.

Third Eye stopped existing.  I'm assuming that the people who were using it switched to something more mundane but equally horrible.  Or a few lucky ones got better.  And a metric ton of them are probably in psych wards.
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: the neurovore of Zur-En-Aargh on May 04, 2010, 04:51:51 PM
I recognize that the source got nuked, but there ought to be at least a crapton of ThreeEye junkies running about with WICKED cravings and crazy  nightmares. At the very least the sheer torture of withdrawal would attract a metric crapton on Skavises. Skavi. Skavisises. Whatever.
So what happened to the drug addicts?

I don't recall anything saying it was particularly addictive.
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Sheaman3773 on May 04, 2010, 06:46:12 PM
I don't recall anything saying it was particularly addictive.

Um, it's been a little while since I've read SF, but didn't they say it was insanely addictive?
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Lady Knight Ignus on May 04, 2010, 07:10:57 PM
I don't recall anything saying it was particularly addictive.
We get a great description from Monica Sells of how much a person craves the three eye even after the first time they take it.  Victor Sells forced her to take it, so Monica knows what she's talking about.  That happens near the end of Storm Front when Harry visits her at her house.  Sorry, don't have the book in front of me so I can't provide a page number.
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: the neurovore of Zur-En-Aargh on May 04, 2010, 07:21:09 PM
We get a great description from Monica Sells of how much a person craves the three eye even after the first time they take it.  Victor Sells forced her to take it, so Monica knows what she's talking about.  That happens near the end of Storm Front when Harry visits her at her house.  Sorry, don't have the book in front of me so I can't provide a page number.

OK, let me rephrase.

I remember the experience of the Sight brought on by the drug being compelling. I do not remember the drug being physically addictive.

I may be misremembering.
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Stark on May 05, 2010, 12:29:38 AM
OK, let me rephrase.

I remember the experience of the Sight brought on by the drug being compelling. I do not remember the drug being physically addictive.

I may be misremembering.

I'm a social worker.

Psychologically addicting things are just as dangerous as physically addicting ones. Addictions to things like gambling, internet posting, and sex (to name a few common ones, and no I'm not joking about the internet thing) are just as psychologically damaging when suddenly removed as things that are physically addicting.

But that's just my SCIENCE talking.
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Landing on May 05, 2010, 02:09:25 AM
here are some quotes from the book talking about how addictive it was.

the police talking about after Harry takes down a three eye junky.
Quote
The taller one nodded. “Stuff hooks harder than crack. Thanks for the help. Didn’t know you were a civilian, though.

And Monica Sells talking about the first time she used it.
Quote
She continued, speaking in a low, hurried rush. “I wanted more. Even when it was over, even though it was horrible, I wanted more. I tried not to let it show, but he could tell. He looked into my eyes and he knew, Mr. Dresden. Like you did just now. And he started to laugh. Like he’d just won the lottery. He kissed me, he was so happy. And it made me sick.
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: neofyte on May 09, 2010, 12:18:17 AM
I'm a social worker.

Psychologically addicting things are just as dangerous as physically addicting ones. Addictions to things like gambling, internet posting, and sex (to name a few common ones, and no I'm not joking about the internet thing) are just as psychologically damaging when suddenly removed as things that are physically addicting.

But that's just my SCIENCE talking.

So what is the science behind endogenous addictions?  (I'm a social worker too, and biochemistry is kicking my social work brain's ass!
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Curly on May 09, 2010, 05:38:02 PM
What are your thoughts, concerning your work, on Barthes' "Death of the Author" and the idea of Intentional Fallacy?
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Dina on May 09, 2010, 08:28:59 PM
That is my question: Why agent Tilly didn't react to Harry taking his hand. Harry felt the tingle of a little power. Tilly didn't notice his power?
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Changes on May 10, 2010, 01:41:44 AM
That Book blew my mind. IS Harry really dead and is there a 13th book coming out.
i can't wait
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Shecky on May 10, 2010, 02:04:12 AM
That Book blew my mind. IS Harry really dead and is there a 13th book coming out.
i can't wait

Read my answer to your previous post:

http://www.jimbutcheronline.com/bb/index.php/topic,16724.msg812725.html#msg812725
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: chainblue on May 10, 2010, 09:33:41 PM
Why isn't Odin missing an eye?
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Shecky on May 10, 2010, 10:34:30 PM
Why isn't Odin missing an eye?

He is:

Quote
He wasn’t all that im­pos­ing to look at. A man in good shape, maybe in his ear­ly fifties. Lean and spare, in the way of long-​dis­tance run­ners, but too heavy in the shoul­ders and arms for that to be all he did. His hair was long for a man, and just a bit shag­gy. It was the col­or of a fu­ri­ous thun­der­cloud, and his eye was ice blue. A black cloth patch over the oth­er eye com­bined with a ver­ti­cal scar sim­ilar to my own made me think that I’d been right about the cor­po­rate lo­go.
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Niccos Shadow on May 11, 2010, 05:50:43 AM
*cough*

Uhm, is it possible for one of the High Sidhe to become possessed in some way? Kind of like how the Fallen can possess a mortal I mean? Or that could otherwise get to them through the people they are bound to?
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Aakaakaak on May 11, 2010, 04:40:13 PM
*cough*

Uhm, is it possible for one of the High Sidhe to become possessed in some way? Kind of like how the Fallen can possess a mortal I mean? Or that could otherwise get to them through the people they are bound to?

Some are suspecting that's what happened to Leansidhe when she was gifted with the evil dagger.

----------

Is there a Dresdenverse Trivia game in the works and if not what would it take to get them made?
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: mrshwiggy on May 13, 2010, 08:21:38 AM
So what is the science behind endogenous addictions?  (I'm a social worker too, and biochemistry is kicking my social work brain's ass!

Wow, how many Social Worker's read The Dresden Files!? I'm a Social Worker too, and for my two cents on this topic, I'm going to apply the logic that I always tend to apply when fantasy stuffs don't match up with scientific facts. We don't have accurate research on how Magic works. I'm not trying to be cocky or anything, but seriously, the fact that it's a magic potion could mean something along the lines that, while violently addictive, ThreeEye could have very abrupt withdrawals. It's made of magic 'stuff' so who's to say how it interacts with silly things like neurological pathways? Maybe after a while, the desire just 'goes away.' Or maybe its a plot point that's coming back around. "Something, something black council, something, magical connection of subconscious addiction, something something, mind slave army, something, own'd."
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: neofyte on May 13, 2010, 05:20:15 PM
Wow, how many Social Worker's read The Dresden Files!? I'm a Social Worker too...

How many social workers does it take to change a light bulb? ...
(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Darkarma on May 15, 2010, 04:06:16 PM
In AAAA Wizardry from the Our World. What anime wall scroll was hanging from the room with the three girls with big eyes in it?
Or is it one of the more recent Italian renditions of anime similar to W.I.T.C.H.?
Curious anime fan has checked in!

Edit: Oh and did Billy hit the nail right on the head? Are there Spring and Autumn Faerie courts?

*Whistles*
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: snowbank on May 15, 2010, 07:55:35 PM
Ok, maybe this has been answered already, but has there been any word on what Jim's new post-Alera project will be???
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: neofyte on May 15, 2010, 08:29:36 PM
Ok, maybe this has been answered already, but has there been any word on what Jim's new post-Alera project will be???

Good reading, this, and the source is fairly reliable  :D

http://www.jimbutcheronline.com/bb/index.php/topic,5955.msg160950.html#msg160950
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: snowbank on May 15, 2010, 08:37:26 PM
Thanks, I'd seen that, I was hoping for more specifics, but they will come when they do. Appreciate the reply.
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Shecky on May 16, 2010, 12:14:43 PM
Good reading, this, and the source is fairly reliable  :D

http://www.jimbutcheronline.com/bb/index.php/topic,5955.msg160950.html#msg160950

Except he's changed his mind since then. Currently, the space opera is on indefinite hold (just like its protagonist :D ). As of right now, Jim's done his extra short stories and is starting up with Ghost Story. There are rumblings of a fantasy project with Cam Banks, but those are unofficial (so says Cam, anyway ;D ). The EPIC epic fantasy is also in a holding pattern. Mostly, Jim's finally able to relax a little bit - the writing and publishing schedule of the past several years has been a real bear on him and his fam, and I'd be willing to bet they're all appreciating the lowered demands on his time for the moment. :)
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: LogicMouseLives on May 16, 2010, 06:19:39 PM
In AAAA Wizardry from the Our World. What anime wall scroll was hanging from the room with the three girls with big eyes in it?
Or is it one of the more recent Italian renditions of anime similar to W.I.T.C.H.?
Curious anime fan has checked in!


Not absolutely positive, but my strong guess is the PowerPuff Girls.

(At least, that would show excellent taste on Jim's part.  ;D

LML
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: knnn on May 17, 2010, 01:31:52 AM
In Dead Beat, Bob says that Kemmler was put down for the last time in 1961.

It so happens that on October 30th, 1961 (Halloween Eve), the Russians supposedly exploded the "Tsar Bomb", the largest man-made explosion ever, somewhere in the Arctic Circle.

Is this:

1.  A coincidence

2.  Exploded by the Russians as attempt by the mortal authorities to cover up the destruction caused by the supernatural energies involved in taking Kemmler down.

3.  Actually the result of Kemmler's Death Curse?

Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Darkarma on May 17, 2010, 06:14:49 PM
Not absolutely positive, but my strong guess is the PowerPuff Girls.

(At least, that would show excellent taste on Jim's part.  ;D

LML

Hadn't even considered that and I just was reading a Bleedman Doujinshi of the same. But that does sound like a good thought on Harry's GM *Snickers*
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Guardianw007 on May 27, 2010, 12:07:48 AM
So, having decided to de-lurk, and having lurked here enough, I know that (given the high number of "first ever posts" in this thread) it is positively an unwritten rule one must post here first. :)  Thus, I begin:

Do Harry's force rings take away kinetic energy when it is transferred (Thus, when Harry punches something, slightly less force is transferred into the object), or does it work by taking a small portion of the kinetic energy from his arm and storing it in the ring (Thus Harry reaching to make a last second catch has to fight his own rings which will slow his reaction).  I'm assuming the DV doesn't take the position that Isaac Newton was a punk Re: conservation of energy.  Thanks.

Now to go play in the other threads.
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: snowbank on May 27, 2010, 04:18:54 PM
Except he's changed his mind since then. Currently, the space opera is on indefinite hold (just like its protagonist :D ). As of right now, Jim's done his extra short stories and is starting up with Ghost Story. There are rumblings of a fantasy project with Cam Banks, but those are unofficial (so says Cam, anyway ;D ). The EPIC epic fantasy is also in a holding pattern. Mostly, Jim's finally able to relax a little bit - the writing and publishing schedule of the past several years has been a real bear on him and his fam, and I'd be willing to bet they're all appreciating the lowered demands on his time for the moment. :)

This is way late, but thanks for the info!  ;)
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Thanatos on May 29, 2010, 07:34:00 AM
I've been editing / proofing 'for fun' since I started reading...
I tend to be a natural at it. I mean, I still make typos myself, but your/you're, sense/since, quiet/quite and the like tend to jump out at me and disturb the flow of what I'm reading. Netspeak crap like your/ur is very annoying. As you can imagine, reading message boards or practically anything else online tends to set off that peeve on a near-constant basis. I try to control it, but I always have the urge to say something about it. Do you get that urge too? If so, how do you turn it off?

*******

Ok, a question for Jim. What happened to all of the Red Court infected? Was their connection strong enough to kill them? Were they cured? Did they remain as they were, meaning the next time one loses control and kills, the Red Court is reborn?

Also, as I understood it, the bloodline curse would travel up the generations, killing all direct ancestors. If Maggie had been killed, it would have taken Harry's and Susan's parents, grandparents, great-grandparents and so on. If it could jump over to siblings as well, Thomas would be in danger, who would have passed it up to the White King. Possibly Lara and the other Raith sisters could have died as well, if the curse could spread to the other siblings of a half-sibling. Suffice it to say, many would die. The trouble comes in if the curse is also able to trace it's way down bloodlines. It seems to have done that in the Red Court. Susan was sired by Bianca, sired by Ortega, sired by Arianna, sired by the Red King. Any other childe (please excuse my use of V:tM terms) of Bianca, Ortega, Arianna, or the King would die. So that takes out the first and second generation vamps, but descendants of 2nd generation vamps other than Arianna would not be in direct ancestry or the siblings of someone that was.

Red King - Arianna - Ortega - Bianca - Susan
|________N2 - G3N2 - etc.
 \________N3 - G3N3 - etc.

While nobles N2 and N3 (on through Nx) would die because they were siblings to Arianna, the 3rd generation vamps of their lines are only cousins to Ortega, not siblings. Since those vamps did die, that means the curse traveled back down bloodlines from anyone it targeted, as well as up them.

The trouble with that is, if Maggie had been killed, the entire human race, and possibly all life on the planet could have died with her. Either this curse was only theoretical until now, or it can't travel up and then back down other branches, and there are still Red Court vamps around, just with no central authority.

I suppose that another possibility is that the curse's ability to trace back down lines of ancestry stops at any point that the direct ancestors are already dead. Then it would seem that Thomas was safe, because Margaret was already dead. Any other children of Ebenezer would die, but unless his mother or father were still alive, any siblings or cousins of his would be safe. However, the fact that the Red King was still around meant that every vampire of his court would die, as the curse traveled up to him and then back down every branch coming from him.

Hmm, that was much longer and more difficult to explain than I'd expected. Perhaps I can mock up a better family tree illustration if necessary.
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Wizard H on May 29, 2010, 08:06:03 AM
I tend to be a natural at it. I mean, I still make typos myself, but your/you're, sense/since, quiet/quite and the like tend to jump out at me and disturb the flow of what I'm reading. Netspeak crap like your/ur is very annoying. As you can imagine, reading message boards or practically anything else online tends to set off that peeve on a near-constant basis. I try to control it, but I always have the urge to say something about it. Do you get that urge too? If so, how do you turn it off?

*******

Ok, a question for Jim. What happened to all of the Red Court infected? Was their connection strong enough to kill them? Were they cured? Did they remain as they were, meaning the next time one loses control and kills, the Red Court is reborn?

Also, as I understood it, the bloodline curse would travel up the generations, killing all direct ancestors. If Maggie had been killed, it would have taken Harry's and Susan's parents, grandparents, great-grandparents and so on. If it could jump over to siblings as well, Thomas would be in danger, who would have passed it up to the White King. Possibly Lara and the other Raith sisters could have died as well, if the curse could spread to the other siblings of a half-sibling. Suffice it to say, many would die. The trouble comes in if the curse is also able to trace it's way down bloodlines. It seems to have done that in the Red Court. Susan was sired by Bianca, sired by Ortega, sired by Arianna, sired by the Red King. Any other childe (please excuse my use of V:tM terms) of Bianca, Ortega, Arianna, or the King would die. So that takes out the first and second generation vamps, but descendants of 2nd generation vamps other than Arianna would not be in direct ancestry or the siblings of someone that was.

Red King - Arianna - Ortega - Bianca - Susan
|________N2 - G3N2 - etc.
 \________N3 - G3N3 - etc.

While nobles N2 and N3 (on through Nx) would die because they were siblings to Arianna, the 3rd generation vamps of their lines are only cousins to Ortega, not siblings. Since those vamps did die, that means the curse traveled back down bloodlines from anyone it targeted, as well as up them.

The trouble with that is, if Maggie had been killed, the entire human race, and possibly all life on the planet could have died with her. Either this curse was only theoretical until now, or it can't travel up and then back down other branches, and there are still Red Court vamps around, just with no central authority.

I suppose that another possibility is that the curse's ability to trace back down lines of ancestry stops at any point that the direct ancestors are already dead. Then it would seem that Thomas was safe, because Margaret was already dead. Any other children of Ebenezer would die, but unless his mother or father were still alive, any siblings or cousins of his would be safe. However, the fact that the Red King was still around meant that every vampire of his court would die, as the curse traveled up to him and then back down every branch coming from him.

Hmm, that was much longer and more difficult to explain than I'd expected. Perhaps I can mock up a better family tree illustration if necessary.
I think the cycle o' death went more like

Susan dies, then all the vamps of her generation, her 'siblings'.  Then it goes to her 'parent' Bianca and all of Bianca's 'siblings' as well wiping out that generation.  Then Bianca's sire and his siblings, so on and so on, wiping out whole generations as it climbs upwards along the tree.    
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Thanatos on May 29, 2010, 08:55:16 AM
I think the cycle o' death went more like

Susan dies, then all the vamps of her generation, her 'siblings'.  Then it goes to her 'parent' Bianca and all of Bianca's 'siblings' as well wiping out that generation.  Then Bianca's sire and his siblings, so on and so on, wiping out whole generations as it climbs upwards along the tree.    
Only other vamps made by Bianca would be Susan's siblings. The rest would be cousins.

Killing Susan (5th Gen) would have killed Bianca (4th Gen), had she been alive (showing that the curse can continue up the chain even if a link is missing).

All other 5th Gen vamps made by Bianca would die, since those are Susan's siblings.

Other 4th Gen vamps made by Ortega die for being Bianca's siblings. Let's call one Jose. While he dies as Bianca's sibling, any vamps made by Jose are Susan's cousins.

Other 3rd Gen vamps made by Arianna are Ortega's siblings, so they die. Call one of them Aurum. While Aurum dies, his vampiric children and grandchildren of the 4th and 5th generations are some kind of cousin to Bianca or Susan.

Other 2nd Gen vamps made by the King include all the nobles that are siblings to Arianna. The 3rd, 4th, and 5th generations coming from those other nobles are some kind of cousin to Ortega, Bianca, and Susan.

The King dies.

Now, if cousins are killed as well as siblings, that would have destroyed the whole human race if Maggie had been killed. The Reds don't care about humanity, but they'd get awful thirsty if we all died. For that matter, all other living things are cousins to humanity if you trace it back far enough (unless in the Dresdenverse, the Genesis story of each species being created separately is literal truth).
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Murphy Fan on May 29, 2010, 02:58:44 PM
I love the PowerPuff Girls. Bubbles is my fav
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: the neurovore of Zur-En-Aargh on May 29, 2010, 07:06:49 PM
Also, as I understood it, the bloodline curse would travel up the generations, killing all direct ancestors

What we are told and what we are shown are different.

I read this as the people who tell us what we are told are in error.
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Shecky on May 29, 2010, 11:29:42 PM
This is way late, but thanks for the info!  ;)

Glad to help! Anything to keep everyone up to date (myself included).
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Xtofur on May 30, 2010, 09:41:17 PM
Is Changes the last Dresden Files Book? Is Harry dead?

I would like to really know.
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: snowbank on May 30, 2010, 10:18:13 PM
Is Changes the last Dresden Files Book? Is Harry dead?

I would like to really know.

No. The next book will be titled "Ghost Story" and will be published in April 2011.
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Dina on May 30, 2010, 11:06:12 PM
And there are at least 10 more planned books.

Apparently, yes. Harry is dead. In october you could check "Aftermath", a new short story that would be published on "Side Jobs", the book that recollects the short stories of the Dresdenverse. Aftermath takes place 45 minutes after "Changes" and it is narrated by Murphy.
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Thanatos on June 01, 2010, 01:26:51 AM
And there are at least 10 more planned books.

Apparently, yes. Harry is dead. In October you could check "Aftermath", a new short story that would be published on "Side Jobs", the book that recollects the short stories of the Dresdenverse. Aftermath takes place 45 minutes after "Changes" and it is narrated by Murphy.
If he is dead, but is then resuscitated (second time for that trick, so I doubt that's exactly how it plays out), then I guess that technically releases him from Winter Knighthood. There is no "spirit of the law" in Faerie rules, so the technicality stands. It stands, even as crazy as it may make Mab to have finally gotten whom she loves, only to have him independent, unowned again. Really, do you think Maeve or Aurora made such a production to celebrate when they claimed Slate or Reuel? Harry was starting to melt the Ice Queen's heart a little, and since she cannot be other than what her nature makes her, the paradox made her a little nuts. The cold snap after losing him so soon is sure to be horrific. I wouldn't be surprised if all of Lake Michigan freezes solid down to it's bed this winter.

All just speculation of course, and I can't wait to see how it actually develops. This is the first true cliffhanger ending, I think. That's certainly done what it's supposed to do!
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: jbmdw45 on June 01, 2010, 02:04:14 AM
Of course, there's also the question of who ends up being the closest vessel of Winter that ends up with the mantle. Toot-toot usually isn't far from Harry, and he considers himself part of winter now, right? That would be hilarious in a way, but also very sad if Mab does something nasty to him in a fit of rage. She's also unlikely to recruit a new Knight anytime soon, as she tries to get Harry back. Whomever ends up holding the mantle may be blocked up in ice for a while.

Only the Queens are eligible vessels for the Knight's power. If just any Summer faerie could receive the power, Harry wouldn't have been able to deduce anything useful from the information the Mothers gave him in Summer Knight--in particular, he wouldn't have known that Aurora did it.

-Max
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Thanatos on June 01, 2010, 02:49:05 AM
Only the Queens are eligible vessels for the Knight's power. If just any Summer faerie could receive the power, Harry wouldn't have been able to deduce anything useful from the information the Mothers gave him in Summer Knight--in particular, he wouldn't have known that Aurora did it.

-Max
Hmm, ok... I just figured Aurora made sure she was near when it happened, but I see your point. Scratch that part, then.
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: neofyte on June 01, 2010, 06:48:57 AM
I love the PowerPuff Girls. Bubbles is my fav

MoJo JoJo for me  :)
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: the neurovore of Zur-En-Aargh on June 01, 2010, 03:54:20 PM
It stands, even as crazy as it may make Mab to have finally gotten whom she loves, only to have him independent, unowned again. Really, do you think Maeve or Aurora made such a production to celebrate when they claimed Slate or Reuel?

"loves " ?

Harry is the strongest wizard of his generation, and Mab may well know about his nigh-unique power over Outsiders; that's plenty of reason to celebrate exceptionally, without an atom of love involved.
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Aakaakaak on June 01, 2010, 04:51:19 PM
So to play off Ms. Duck's idea a bit...

Is it possible for a pure mortal human (with or without powers) to become fae or sidhe through an ascension or other means?
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Thanatos on June 03, 2010, 08:39:16 AM
"loves " ?

Harry is the strongest wizard of his generation, and Mab may well know about his nigh-unique power over Outsiders; that's plenty of reason to celebrate exceptionally, without an atom of love involved.

Harry has a history of making nonhuman minds a little more human by the way he interacts with them, such as with Bob and Lash. it's almost as if thinking of them in human terms causes his mortal free will to rub off on them a little. Mab is far more powerful, so her core nature would stay the same, but he may have left some scratches on the surface of the glacier. To someone that's never perceived herself in any way outside her own eternally unchanging nature, that might be significant. That may be part of why she's been acting increasingly odd lately.
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: cass on June 05, 2010, 03:08:31 PM
Changes Question....
(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Thanatos on June 05, 2010, 05:50:14 PM
I noticed that too, Cass, but I figure that either Jim used the wrong word or the editor changed it to the wrong word. Midsummer/Litha and Midwinter/Yule are indeed solstices. Since so much of Summer Knight is based on that timing, as opposed to the smaller part it plays in Changes, I'll take SK as the dominant reference.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wheel_of_the_year
(http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/8b/Wheel_of_the_Year.svg)

I think modern Druids tend to focus on the solstice & equinox days (using the "Alban-" names), but since in-between times are supposed to be more significant to witches, Wicca considers the halfway points between a solstice and equinox to be it's greater holidays. Since many Celtic groups considered a new day to begin just after sunset, celebrations for Samhain would have begun on the night of the day before (10/31) according to our current calendar that starts the new day at midnight. Thus, if Harry was born after sundown, he's a Samhain baby.
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: cass on June 05, 2010, 07:02:26 PM
Oh, I'm not doubting that the equinoxes are important to at least *some* denizens of Faerie.  I was just pointing out that Harry's thought process in Changes doesn't match up with our understanding of how that portion of Faerie politics works from SK.

I guess my faith in Jim, Jim's editor and/or the betas is such that I didn't think that using the word "equinox" in place of "solstice" would be unintentional. (I'm paranoid, you say? Why thank you!)  Hence my rambling question about whether it was intended as a clue to an as-yet-untold segment of Faerie politics, or whether it's merely a mistake on Harry's part. (And if my faith in the author and his editing staff is misplaced? Then the second explanation-- "Cut Harry some slack-- he's been through enough to excuse that kind of slip"-- prevails.)

I just want to know if this line is something that should go on my hypothetical corkboard of conspiracy theories.  I also figure that 1) I'm more likely to get an answer if I give Jim an out and 2) if it is significant all Jim has to do in order to cause pain and suffering and rampant speculation (which, I'm told, is pleasing to him) is say, without elaborating, that the word choice was intentional.
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Thanatos on June 05, 2010, 08:28:38 PM
I suppose it could be intentional, meant as a mistake on Harry's part, but I've always thought the books come from his case files. That's the in-character way they're treated in the DFRPG, as well. From the marginalia there, it seems like each was written up at some unspecified time later (much later in the case of Changes, granted) after the case was closed.

Either way, pointing it out can either get it fixed in future editions, or maybe get a confirmation that it was intentional. Arguing about that sort of thing would be pointless and can only screw up the thread.

Thanks for mentioning the equinox/solstice thing, whichever way it turns out. I meant to ask about it myself. In my case, i have the audiobook, so for me there was a third possibility: maybe the draft Mr. Marsters was working from could have been slightly different, if it came from a version prior to the final edit.
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Dina on June 06, 2010, 02:20:22 AM
I don't think Dresden, as a character, could make such a mistake. Solstices and Equinox days are too important for magic things for that. A wizard, a person who knows things, shouldn't confuse them.
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: cass on June 06, 2010, 03:05:56 AM
Well, no, he shouldn't-- that's why I wanted confirmation  :D


Let's just say that, given the days leading up to that line, I wouldn't think less of him for having a lapse in vocabulary if, indeed, that's all it was.  ;)
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: dragon80 on June 06, 2010, 05:14:40 AM
It doesn't really make a difference because the equinox was still after the solstice, so what he said was correct. He might have used equinox because it would have been the most recent event and didn't want people to confuse what time of the year it was. Of course it could mean everything, a small detail that doesn't come back until the final trilogy and makes everyone go, "Oh, that was what that meant."
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Thanatos on June 06, 2010, 11:34:26 AM
Well every equinox comes after a solstice, which came after an equinox, which came after a solstice... and that's just a year's worth. Good thing he doesn't live on Discworld with 8 seasons to keep track of! :P

The line was an internal thought, if i recall. The books represent his case files, written up at some unspecified point after each case was closed (much later in the case of Changes, granted). Billy refers to the case files in the DFRPG, and he has all the information in the books up to Small Favor*. So his mental state at the time it was happening shouldn't mess up his vocabulary years later. I mean, if he had permanent psychological our neurological damage at the time of the case file's writeup, he'd have those aphasic mistakes during the whole book.

* I wonder if the DFRPG will be completed as an in-character book in the Dresdenverse, given what happened to Kirby not too long after the "draft" that we see as the RPG-in-progress?
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Curly on June 06, 2010, 09:27:23 PM
Will you change from First Person to Third Person Narrative for the Big Apocalyptic Trilogy?
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: the neurovore of Zur-En-Aargh on June 08, 2010, 03:13:14 AM
Harry has a history of making nonhuman minds a little more human by the way he interacts with them, such as with Bob and Lash. it's almost as if thinking of them in human terms causes his mortal free will to rub off on them a little.

I read that as "harry is good at anthropomorphising non-humans he hangs around with for any length of time", fwiw. That it's a perception thing rather than necessarily an entirely real thing.
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Thanatos on June 08, 2010, 04:08:54 AM
I read that as "harry is good at anthropomorphising non-humans he hangs around with for any length of time", fwiw. That it's a perception thing rather than necessarily an entirely real thing.
Sure, that's how it begins, and then the anthromorphisms stick. Lash eventually drifted enough from Lasciel that she sacrificed her existence (or most of it, at least) in order to save Harry. Bob has no reason to have a personality except that Harry treats him as a person. Harry's id may agree with Bob pretty often, but the rest of Harry finds Bob's perverse fascination with sex to be annoying and strange. When it's just one of many air/intellect spirits, or a shadow that lives entirely in Harry's head, there's not a lot of consequence to it developing a more human persona, but even a tiny drift in the mind of a being like Mab could have a huge impact, possibly compounded by the athame. Perhaps it was Margret's.
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: neofyte on June 08, 2010, 04:24:56 AM
I read that as "harry is good at anthropomorphising non-humans he hangs around with for any length of time", fwiw. That it's a perception thing rather than necessarily an entirely real thing.
Harry is like a virus, or a really good, not overly dogmatic, proselyter.  He gets in between the spaces of your thoughts and settles there like dust.  Then you can't get him completely out, no matter how much you shake your head, or pound it against the wall, or have someone blow into your ear. - from the unauthorized memoirs of Lash  ;)
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Dina on June 08, 2010, 04:26:00 AM
^ I love it!
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: the neurovore of Zur-En-Aargh on June 09, 2010, 04:09:26 PM
Sure, that's how it begins, and then the anthromorphisms stick. Lash eventually drifted enough from Lasciel that she sacrificed her existence (or most of it, at least) in order to save Harry.

This is what Harry likes to think; it may well serve Lash for him to be mistaken here.
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Thanatos on June 10, 2010, 08:48:21 AM
This is what Harry likes to think; it may well serve Lash for him to be mistaken here.
...and maybe the entire series is the schizophrenic fantasy of an institutional patient.
Whatever, I'm done.  :)

*******

New question for Jim:
Did Harry name his foundling kitten after Mister Mistoffeles from the play Cats?
After all, that Mister has a magic/stage illusion theme...
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Shecky on June 10, 2010, 10:58:04 AM
No, he named the cat "Mister" because it was the closest he could get to "Master" without sounding... off. :D

(Yes, that was a joke.)
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: cass on June 10, 2010, 01:55:26 PM
Could also have just been an offshoot of, "Hey there, mister, how'd you get in that dumpster?" as he's removing the kitten from the trash.
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: the neurovore of Zur-En-Aargh on June 10, 2010, 03:37:41 PM
...and maybe the entire series is the schizophrenic fantasy of an institutional patient.
Whatever, I'm done.  :)

I hardly think "one character, who is noted for the skill of her deceptions among beings who habitually deceive on a scale of centuries, and who has already been shown capable of fairly large scale deceptions (cf. 'Shiela') deceives our protagonist on an important plot point" is on a par with "Harry is actually one of those guys at the back of the room in One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest and it's all in his head".
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Led Guardian on June 10, 2010, 04:07:48 PM
I hardly think "one character, who is noted for the skill of her deceptions among beings who habitually deceive on a scale of centuries, and who has already been shown capable of fairly large scale deceptions (cf. 'Shiela') deceives our protagonist on an important plot point" is on a par with "Harry is actually one of those guys at the back of the room in One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest and it's all in his head".
Somewhere, though, JB actually said that Lash really did change, and it's not some con.
Title: Nevermind.
Post by: Thanatos on June 10, 2010, 04:29:36 PM
Nevermind.
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Curly on June 10, 2010, 04:39:14 PM
Although I understand that this is supposed to be funny, I think it's a perfect example of retaining hard feelings against those who disagree with one's theories. I feel it's inappropriate to express these feelings on the boards and especially in this particular thread.
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Shecky on June 10, 2010, 04:56:14 PM
*edited to protect the guilty*
Title: Nevermind.
Post by: Thanatos on June 10, 2010, 05:06:12 PM
Nevermind.
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Shecky on June 10, 2010, 05:12:35 PM
*edited to protect the guilty*
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: the neurovore of Zur-En-Aargh on June 10, 2010, 05:39:22 PM
Somewhere, though, JB actually said that Lash really did change, and it's not some con.

He said she really changed, but did not, that I have ever seen, confirm that it was a change to being good, rather than a change from direct temptation tactics to feigning her death.
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: the neurovore of Zur-En-Aargh on June 10, 2010, 05:41:17 PM
Thanatos would appear to have changed/deleted the post I intended to respond to here, but I just want to say; I did not intend any personal antagonism, and I apologise for coming across as in any way personally antagonistic.
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Thanatos on June 11, 2010, 01:00:25 AM
Thanatos would appear to have changed/deleted the post I intended to respond to here, but I just want to say; I did not intend any personal antagonism, and I apologize for coming across as in any way personally antagonistic.

I would PM this but your inbox is full...

Sorry man, if I did actually offend you. The original nickname or whatever was supposed to be good-natured (thus the :P that was on it), but the comments following it* did prod my mood the other way for a bit. I don't have anything against you personally either.

Peace :)



*Nothing against you either, Curly and Shecky. Though I may not have appreciated your wisdom at the time, thanks for pointing out that what I said might not be interpreted so lightly.



So, uh... how about those Cubs? :P

Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: neofyte on June 11, 2010, 03:01:41 AM
Peace :)

Love...
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Murphy's Stunt Double on June 11, 2010, 03:29:41 AM
And Rock and Roll....

which of these is the greatest, Jim?
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: neofyte on June 11, 2010, 03:48:17 AM
And Rock and Roll....

which of these is the greatest, Jim?

I called and you came!  Another manifest proof of Jung's notion of collective unconscious =)
If I could presume to answer for the man, I believe he would point us to John Lennon, who artfully folded all three into one complete whole  :D
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Murphy's Stunt Double on June 11, 2010, 02:17:43 PM
I called and you came!  Another manifest proof of Jung's notion of collective unconscious =)

Jung Rocks! He's my favorite!  :D
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: the neurovore of Zur-En-Aargh on June 11, 2010, 03:45:39 PM
And Rock and Roll....

Love has a sword. Rock and Roll, of course, has an axe.
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: IIIMarconeIII on June 11, 2010, 09:19:05 PM
^omglol
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Shecky on June 11, 2010, 09:27:33 PM
Love has a sword. Rock and Roll, of course, has an axe.

(http://bitstream.soundandvisionmag.com/.a/6a00df3521c6368834010535e93013970b-320wi)
For Music with Rocks In.
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: neofyte on June 12, 2010, 02:47:50 AM
(http://bitstream.soundandvisionmag.com/.a/6a00df3521c6368834010535e93013970b-320wi)
So who get's the rock axe?  I just can't visualize anyone else but full grown Toot wielding that baby.
Well done Shecky  :D
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Dina on June 12, 2010, 04:30:03 AM
Molly!
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: vultur on June 14, 2010, 04:26:10 AM
In Proven Guilty, the Red King is described as ~4000 years old; in Changes, Luccio says that Arianna predates the human invention of written language (~5300 years ago). Arianna is the Red King's 'descendant'. Was Luccio wrongly informed, or exaggerating, about Arianna's age?
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: svb1972 on June 14, 2010, 01:02:26 PM
Or Jim made a booboo :)
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Niccos Shadow on June 14, 2010, 05:37:11 PM
In regards to Maggie LeFay's "Way Stone" (for lack of a better term):

It's said a few times throughout the series that where the Nevernever touches the mortal world changes as the mortal world changes. I also recall in WK it's implied that the person creating the 'Way' can effect where they end up in the Nevernever.

That being said, would it be right to assume that the stone is more of a utility that senses the 'Ways' as relevant to the user at the moment of use, basically Maggie's affinity for Ways imbued into an item, as opposed to it merely being the collective knowledge of maggie's travels/mapping?
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Esperacchius on June 15, 2010, 05:13:18 AM
Oh...I never realized this thread existed...wwwhhhhoooooooboy....here we go, let's see if I can get them all in one *takes deep breath*
(click to show/hide)
and finally...
(click to show/hide)

*GAAAAAAAAAAASP*

whew....that...was a lot of air.....
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: tiny[but]fierce on June 15, 2010, 05:26:57 AM
Is it safe to assume that sometime in the near, yet distant future (and because of your supremely awesome ability to keep us chomping at the bit for more Dresden) that we will eventually find out what people see when they soulgaze with Harry? Or why Murphy has never shared a soulgaze with Harry despite how close their relationship is?

Cuz, um. You know. I think that'd be cool to know :)
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: cass on June 15, 2010, 05:30:27 AM
For your last, I think the book itself has your answer:
Changes Spoilers:
(click to show/hide)
 

We don't know if he was correct to think that, of course. But at this point, it's likely that we'll never find out.
(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Esperacchius on June 15, 2010, 06:08:30 AM
For your last, I think the book itself has your answer:
Changes Spoilers:
(click to show/hide)
 

We don't know if he was correct to think that, of course. But at this point, it's likely that we'll never find out.
(click to show/hide)
(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Striker83 on June 16, 2010, 02:47:28 AM
For your last, I think the book itself has your answer:
Changes Spoilers:
(click to show/hide)
 

We don't know if he was correct to think that, of course. But at this point, it's likely that we'll never find out.
(click to show/hide)


The Eebs to me like they will be there to see you die not send someone to do it.
Maybe the first assassin and sniper were hired by the same person.
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: cass on June 16, 2010, 04:55:35 AM
(click to show/hide)


(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: neofyte on June 16, 2010, 06:19:03 AM
(click to show/hide)

(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Shecky on June 16, 2010, 10:21:32 AM
(click to show/hide)

(click to show/hide)

Quote
(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: dead beef on June 17, 2010, 01:42:33 AM
Is a change from half vampire to full vampire an immediate change or does it take a little bit of time?
If the change rids an individual of a soul, then does the person lose memory of there human life?
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: cass on June 17, 2010, 02:10:52 AM
(and how does the process compare to other half-to-full transitions, such as changelings Choosing to become Fae?)
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: snowbank on June 17, 2010, 03:48:32 AM
Is a change from half vampire to full vampire an immediate change or does it take a little bit of time?
If the change rids an individual of a soul, then does the person lose memory of there human life?


The way I remember reading it in Changes it was a process. Susan said she was feeling different emotions/sensations and the process wasn't complete before she died because she would have attacked Harry if she was full Rampire.
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: dead beef on June 17, 2010, 04:36:31 AM

The way I remember reading it in Changes it was a process. Susan said she was feeling different emotions/sensations and the process wasn't complete before she died because she would have attacked Harry if she was full Rampire.


so he was able to sacrifice her before she was completely ramp?  So then I'm guessing it would be a change that takes a little bit of time.  She had some full vampire blood and when she spilled that blood, she killed em all.  Makes sence.
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: snowbank on June 17, 2010, 12:19:56 PM
(and how does the process compare to other half-to-full transitions, such as changelings Choosing to become Fae?)


I have no idea.
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: felis on June 21, 2010, 08:37:34 PM
Oh...I never realized this thread existed...wwwhhhhoooooooboy....here we go, let's see if I can get them all in one *takes deep breath*
(click to show/hide)
and finally...
(click to show/hide)
.....

About the 3rd question, I believe that Harry says the first thing he ever saw was a
(click to show/hide)
(or something being of that ilk). 
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: wildone654 on June 22, 2010, 06:51:15 PM
Jim, can I have Ghost Story now?
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Shecky on June 22, 2010, 07:01:12 PM
Jim, can I have Ghost Story now?

Hey, Jim left his magic 8-ball! Shake it up and ask!
(http://flyterecords.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/magic_8ball_outlook_not_so_good.jpg)


D'OH.
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: wildone654 on June 23, 2010, 12:37:07 AM
Ya I asked him in a PM too... never got a respons..   :-\
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: ClassiCat on June 26, 2010, 03:49:10 AM
My questions all revolve around who
(click to show/hide)
Which I know you won't answer. (Even though my friends and I have a debate going on who it belongs to. Lash? Maeve? His mom? Only time will tell.)

But the one I will ask about is Mouse. You specified earlier via Ancient Mai, I think, that Mouse is a foo dog. However, Lea, in "Changes," calls him a
(click to show/hide)
. Will you ever fully expound upon the wonder that is Mouse? And how can I get one of my own? (The best I have is a small tornado of tuxedo cat, the tiny bane of my existence.)
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: alreadytaken on June 28, 2010, 03:50:50 AM
This isn't a spoiler in the conventional sense, but my idea might stink, which is my reason for sticking it with other spoiled stuff.  The idea is preceded by a question, though.  So, I'm following a sort of protocol, I think.  Here is the question: do the wards around the domicile of Harry and Mister shed/eject parasites?  I imagine they must, because I have the impression that exceptions to the wards must be made consciously.  Therefore, uninvited fellow traveler's must be shed somewhere near entry (echh!).  It occurred to me also that internal ...um...symbiots would have to be given a pass.  The consequences of doing otherwise would be even more echhy.  Ok, that wasn't the big idea.  Here it is: what if some nefarious personage attempted to exploit Mister's free pass through the wards to infiltrate Harry and Mister's domicile.  Recognizing the stuff I mentioned above, said nefarious personage would probably exploit the internal passage (hair ball, etc.).  Just a thought....
Second thought: if Harry can make a ward that would shed fleas, ticks, etc. at the door from four legged friends, I think he has a money making proposition on his hands.  It might be marketed as being like the those electronic fences, except it "stops the the bugs, not the pet!"  No doubt the federal government would step in and try to stop it.  Never mind...bad idea.
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: ZachCarpenter on July 01, 2010, 02:23:17 AM
Jim, any chance of seeing Harry on the big screen.. ever..?
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: bockbock on July 05, 2010, 08:43:46 AM
Do you need to have the anguished screams of your readers for nourishment, like plants need sunlight, or do you just enjoy them?
Probably both.  He's one of them Malvora folk.  Can't you tell by his wickedly good looks?
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Curly on July 08, 2010, 03:41:34 AM
Have the other two out of three whacks from the Clue-Bat been found yet, or are we still groping in the dark?
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: tiny[but]fierce on July 08, 2010, 03:56:53 AM
Okay, so House Raith feeds on sexual energy, and people affected by true love burns them. Is the entirety of the White Court affected by love the way the Raith clan is, or is it different for Malvora and Skavis? Because for Skavis, the opposite of despair is technically hope...
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: chainblue on July 11, 2010, 05:06:07 AM
What can be soulgazaed besides humans?  Could Harry soulgaze Mouse?
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Neppy-wolf on July 18, 2010, 05:43:22 AM
Have you ever thought of doing a short story like Thomas's or Marcone except with a Black Council member?
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Mindflayer94 on August 04, 2010, 04:26:11 AM
A couple of Questions:

1: which is more fun to write, Dresden or Alera


2: Do you play the Dresden Files RPG, if so, can we see your character?
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Magis on August 05, 2010, 05:38:36 PM
A couple of Questions:

1: which is more fun to write, Dresden or Alera


2: Do you play the Dresden Files RPG, if so, can we see your character?

I believe he's answered both of these in interviews.

1) "Different, and fun for different reasons" is a good summary as I remember?

2) He will neither play nor GM Dresden files. As a GM it would "be too much like work" and as a player I believe his exact words were that he'd "be a GM's nightmare. 'It is this way and I'll put it in the next book if I have to!' ".

Hope that helps. Can provide links to interviews if you need.


--- Magis
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Mindflayer94 on August 06, 2010, 01:59:02 AM
Thanks! :)
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: walkinshoes on August 08, 2010, 06:07:40 PM
Has anyone noticed that Harry didn't actually hear a gunshot? Hence, no one to cast his death curse on? Isn't that exactly how Kinkaide said he would "do" Harry? From a mile away? I guess the Archive decided that Harry as a Winter Knight was not a good thing, and gave him the only way out. Death. Not that Harry hasn't been dead before, but he used it as a tool then, too, didn't he?

Jim, we know you're probably commenting through at least one or two logins, so what do you think? :>
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Shecky on August 09, 2010, 01:50:09 AM
Jim, we know you're probably commenting through at least one or two logins

Um... huh?
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: walkinshoes on August 09, 2010, 02:56:49 AM
I'm just saying he's probably got an account to log in with to throw in a comment or two without everyone going "OOOO" and AAHHH" over it.
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: horsehearted on August 09, 2010, 03:12:28 AM
I'm just saying he's probably got an account to log in with to throw in a comment or two without everyone going "OOOO" and AAHHH" over it.

Unprobable. Jim is maniacal and loves to jerk us around, but the man does have a life... He does other things than read through what his fans are endlessly speculating about. And he's actually pretty nice. When he speaks it is often open to interpretation and we run with that just fine. He doesn't need another login to jerk our chains.

Edited: for spelling. (unprobable is not a word but gets my point across)
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Murphy's Stunt Double on August 09, 2010, 03:36:45 AM
Jim is Fae. Period.
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: jbigelow22 on August 11, 2010, 12:14:45 AM
I believe he's answered both of these in interviews.

1) "Different, and fun for different reasons" is a good summary as I remember?

2) He will neither play nor GM Dresden files. As a GM it would "be too much like work" and as a player I believe his exact words were that he'd "be a GM's nightmare. 'It is this way and I'll put it in the next book if I have to!' ".

Hope that helps. Can provide links to interviews if you need.

That really would suck as a GM - I could also hear something like that can't happen or didn't happen because of this... Sucks that he wouldn't GM it because I could see that game rockin'
--- Magis
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: neofyte on August 11, 2010, 11:10:39 PM
Um... huh?

Jim averages .2 posts per day.  My guess is Neuro and Shecky spend a cumulative ten x more time contemplating the DV than the man himself, at least these days =)  I had suspected the same thing when I first signed on to the boards, but word prints don't match up on any of the likely suspects.  And then I realized I was chasing a will-o-wisp.  Jim has fun in his life, and I *believe* he loves what he does, but his fun times likely come from something non -work - related.
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Shecky on August 12, 2010, 02:21:49 AM
Jim averages .2 posts per day.  My guess is Neuro and Shecky spend a cumulative ten x more time contemplating the DV than the man himself, at least these days =)  I had suspected the same thing when I first signed on to the boards, but word prints don't match up on any of the likely suspects.  And then I realized I was chasing a will-o-wisp.  Jim has fun in his life, and I *believe* he loves what he does, but his fun times likely come from something non -work - related.


Okay.

But not sure what this has to do with the allegation that Jim has multiple login names.

And Jim's contemplation of the DV has reached such staggering levels by now that even if he never thought about it again for the rest of his life, I doubt I could ever reach that number of hours. What you see on the page is just a sliver of what he's thought up and hashed out just to SUPPORT what's on the page, to give it a workable framing.
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: dead beef on August 12, 2010, 02:34:09 AM
Unprobable. Jim is maniacal and loves to jerk us around, but the man does have a life... He does other things than read through what his fans are endlessly speculating about. And he's actually pretty nice. When he speaks it is often open to interpretation and we run with that just fine. He doesn't need another login to jerk our chains.

Edited: for spelling. (unprobable is not a word but gets my point across)

improbable?  :).   But no.  I agree with that.  He has better things to do than this.  It would be too much like work.
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: the neurovore of Zur-En-Aargh on August 12, 2010, 04:35:07 AM
My guess is Neuro and Shecky spend a cumulative ten x more time contemplating the DV than the man himself, at least these days =) 

I am spending, regrettably, quite a bit less time around these days.
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: horsehearted on August 13, 2010, 06:10:31 PM
improbable?

YES! Thank you! I knew there was an actual word for what I meant and for the life of me it was completely gone.
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Shecky on August 13, 2010, 11:59:48 PM
Me fail English? Unpossible!
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Josh_the_Great on August 14, 2010, 06:21:06 AM
Jim, I have a few questions.

Where did Mister go after Harry's house burned down?

Now that Harry's gone, will Micheal go back in to the monster-smiting business, at least to defend Molly from the White Council?

Also, now that's Harry's gone, what kind of personality can we expect from Bob?
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Shecky on August 14, 2010, 11:30:06 AM
Jim, I have a few questions.

Where did Mister go after Harry's house burned down?

Now that Harry's gone, will Micheal go back in to the monster-smiting business, at least to defend Molly from the White Council?

Also, now that's Harry's gone, what kind of personality can we expect from Bob?

The kinds of questions that should be answered by upcoming books aren't typically the questions to be posed in this thread. That's more along the lines of questions about things that have already happened, such as, "How exactly did Malcolm Dresden meet Margaret LaFey?"
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Murphy's Stunt Double on August 16, 2010, 02:43:06 PM
Give the newbie a break, Shecky! No harm in asking. It's not like Jim's gonna give him a straight answer anyway. We all know he's more Fae than Mab!  ;D
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: jbigelow22 on August 16, 2010, 04:11:40 PM
How's this one - why BK instead of Wendy's since the Baconator is obviously the superior burger...
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Shecky on August 16, 2010, 04:32:08 PM
The burger itself is still better at the BK Lounge.

Give the newbie a break, Shecky! No harm in asking. It's not like Jim's gonna give him a straight answer anyway. We all know he's more Fae than Mab!  ;D

And it still won't get an answer out of him until the following books come out. :D
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Jinn Master on August 18, 2010, 11:47:01 AM
Here's another question that won't likely get an answer :P

Why is Demonreach "aptly named"?
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Shecky on August 18, 2010, 11:49:23 AM
Jim'll tell us in the books when the chances of smacking us with the most possible drama are maximized. :D
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: tiny[but]fierce on August 18, 2010, 05:39:32 PM
Here's another question that won't likely get an answer :P

Why is Demonreach "aptly named"?

Because the demon in the island reaches out to touch someone whenever they hop on :)
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Dina on August 19, 2010, 03:54:23 AM
I think that is because there is a door to hell or because the ley line comes from hell.
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Jinn Master on August 19, 2010, 07:24:43 AM
Considering the somewhat vague state of the word "Demon" as an appellation in the DV, who knows what exactly Demonreach is involved with?
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: jbigelow22 on August 19, 2010, 09:50:53 PM
Warning bad joke
 He named it that because you can reach him there and he's de man!

Thanks! I'll be here all nights
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: derrick on August 20, 2010, 01:35:41 AM
Ok, here's something minor enough to perhaps warrant a few answers.  ;D

What exactly was the Brute Squad, from Archangel?  Speculation is that they were some sort of combat specialists, but not Wardens.  Or is Bob just a big Princess Bride fan(atic)?  Furthermore, can we get some details on Archangel?


Thanks! I'll be here all nights

I guess we should try the veal..?
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: LogicMouseLives on August 20, 2010, 02:25:32 AM
I have a question for Jim:

Have you considered publishing the series of essays on writing that you've put up on your LiveJournal?

I've read them several times, and always find them helpful, funny and inspiring, but I would love to have a printed, bound copy of them (along with any other advice you wanted to take the time to write down ;D) on my shelf for easier reference.

Like maybe as an appendix to your next collection of short stories?

Pretty please?

LML
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: jbigelow22 on August 20, 2010, 08:04:26 PM
Try the chicken instead.
'Nother question - who is Jim's favorite "hero" and "villian" to write excluding Harry?
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: snowbank on August 21, 2010, 01:28:03 AM
Jim, while we know you have a plethora of ideas you'd like to write besides Harry, have you settled on one yet? We know you need the additional stimulation and pressure of writing two series along with the con trips, short stories, gaming, parenting, husbanding, lawn mowing, etc. to make you happy.

Thanks!
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: faefan on August 21, 2010, 05:57:04 AM
Just after Susan was infected by the red court and Dresden was working himself to the bone to find a cure, did you reference how you look when you work yourself too hard?
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: za_lord on August 21, 2010, 06:53:08 AM
I read somewhere (not sure if it was in a transcripted interview or on the forums) that the ends of the black staff have the ability to take life and give it back. If this is the case has Eb ever used the staff to its full potential?
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: MijRai on August 21, 2010, 07:25:54 AM
Try the chicken instead.
'Nother question - who is Jim's favorite "hero" and "villian" to write excluding Harry?

I think he said his favorite villian to write was Nicodemus. Don't quote me on it, but that is what I remember.

I wonder...
How important are 'Those Who Walk Before'?
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Shecky on August 21, 2010, 11:57:38 AM
I read somewhere (not sure if it was in a transcripted interview or on the forums) that the ends of the black staff have the ability to take life and give it back. If this is the case has Eb ever used the staff to its full potential?

This was speculation by a boardmember, not confirmed or even addressed by Jim. For the moment, what you see is what you get.
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: za_lord on August 21, 2010, 03:33:54 PM
I was kinda worried bout that. So to rephrase the question in a way that leaves out speculation. As the Blackstaff we know Eb can break the laws of magic, has he ever brought someone back from the dead?
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: sjsharks on August 24, 2010, 11:02:51 PM
When do we get a short story from Mouse's point of view?

Or even better... The MISTER story  ;D
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Magnus on August 25, 2010, 09:23:11 AM
Jim has said that doing a story from  Mouse point of view would reveal too much.
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Magnus on August 26, 2010, 01:54:54 PM
136.  Comment by ANSWERS FROM - JIM BUTCHER — April 14, 2010 @ 1:09 pm
(click to show/hide)


The above says that the Grey Council is 13 persons but why did then Eb say this in Turn Coat hardback version page 405.

"So where does that leave us" <--Harry
""With pure hearts and good intentions," he answered. "Our strength  shall be the strength of ten."

Even if Harry and Eb didn't count that would only add up to 12, so what happened between Turn Coat and Changes that made the Grey Council increase it size?
Well, the question is, have they always been 13 of them or did they start out with 10 people and added 3 more?
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: WoodyWeaver on August 26, 2010, 03:21:08 PM
The above says that the Grey Council is 13 persons but why did then Eb say this in Turn Coat hardback version page 405.

"So where does that leave us" <--Harry
""With pure hearts and good intentions," he answered. "Our strength  shall be the strength of ten."

Because Eb is fond of Tennyson.  (Heck, perhaps he met him.)  Its a line describing Sir Galahad's strength, not a numerical descriptive.
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Magnus on August 26, 2010, 04:18:56 PM
Ah thankyou.
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: nthnclls on August 27, 2010, 02:24:07 AM
I was kinda worried bout that. So to rephrase the question in a way that leaves out speculation. As the Blackstaff we know Eb can break the laws of magic, has he ever brought someone back from the dead?

My guess would be that if he had that ability, he'd bring
(click to show/hide)
back to life.
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: snowbank on August 27, 2010, 02:56:35 AM
My guess would be that if he had that ability, he'd bring
(click to show/hide)
back to life.

You'd think so, but there is so little known about 1) what offenses Maggie1 actually committed and 2) what their relationship was like. But guessings fun.  8)
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Wizard H on August 27, 2010, 02:59:40 AM
You'd think so, but there is so little known about 1) what offenses Maggie1 actually committed and 2) what their relationship was like. But guessings fun.  8)
Plus Eb seems very practical, who knows what bringing someone back from the dead like that does? It could have adverse on the individual and perhaps even on the veil that seperates life and death.  We've seen what happens when people poke that particular border.
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: snowbank on August 27, 2010, 03:56:42 AM
Exactamundo.  ;D
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: za_lord on August 27, 2010, 05:56:52 AM
My guess would be that if he had that ability, he'd bring
(click to show/hide)
back to life.

There was a reason i asked the question the way i did, and that was to avoid the sing songy, im not gonna tell you, from Jim. But yeah, that is exactly the reason i did ask.
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Shecky on August 27, 2010, 11:16:54 AM
Because Eb is fond of Tennyson.  (Heck, perhaps he met him.)  Its a line describing Sir Galahad's strength, not a numerical descriptive.

I thought it more a nod to "How the Grinch Stole Christmas". :D
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: WoodyWeaver on August 27, 2010, 02:24:26 PM
I thought it more a nod to "How the Grinch Stole Christmas". :D

<pendant>
Then it would be "Our strength will be the strength of ten, plus two!"
</pendant>
That would have really confused Magnus...
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: nthnclls on August 28, 2010, 02:50:36 AM
Plus Eb seems very practical, who knows what bringing someone back from the dead like that does? It could have adverse on the individual and perhaps even on the veil that seperates life and death.  We've seen what happens when people poke that particular border.

Eb does, but given Harry's family issues, who know how Eb changes when family's around...
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: grimwho on August 29, 2010, 01:13:20 AM
so now harrys' car has been destroyed with will his next car be i think a willys4x4 station wagon my personal favorite is a 1962 sedan delivery also if this is not appret   please let me know so i will now what is thank you
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Zouli on August 29, 2010, 10:09:30 PM
New member  ;D

I did a search but was unable to locate information regarding my question. I recently read the short story from Marcone's POV. Loved it.

My question is, does JB plan at some point to give us a POV from Mac? One of my fav characters.

Thanks
Z.
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Shecky on August 29, 2010, 10:55:50 PM
Not in announced plans, no. But we can always hope. :D
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Mindflayer94 on September 05, 2010, 02:47:14 AM
Rereading SK I came across this: In SK Maeve offers an answer to his question ("Did you arrange the murder of the Summer Knight") in exchange for his firstborn child, and offered him a Sidhe to bear his child, but what about
(click to show/hide)
(Changes; who's name I can't remember).

(spoilered just in case)
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: snowbank on September 05, 2010, 03:16:58 AM
But Maeve didn't answer, so the Maglet remains uninvolved. Harry found the answer using other methods.
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: sjsharks on September 05, 2010, 03:47:55 PM
i should also point out that
(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: snowbank on September 05, 2010, 03:50:23 PM
i should also point out that
(click to show/hide)

Another mitigating factor.  ;D
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: dead beef on September 06, 2010, 05:24:30 AM
i should also point out that
(click to show/hide)

she could have saw the future....  :)
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Mindflayer94 on September 06, 2010, 10:42:11 PM
Wait wasn't she like 8 in Changes, which would mean she was conceived in Fool Moon, right?
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: LogicMouseLives on September 07, 2010, 01:48:34 AM
Wait wasn't she like 8 in Changes, which would mean she was conceived in Fool Moon, right?

Nope. Death Masks. Fool Moon is twelve years before Changes. Check out Priscillie's highly informative timeline here:

http://www.jimbutcheronline.com/bb/index.php/topic,1592.0.html

LML
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: RitaJune on September 08, 2010, 01:08:32 AM
i should also point out that
(click to show/hide)

Does that matter when one is making deals with Faerie queens?  Not that I believe that Harry made such a deal because he didn't.  I'm just curious.
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: AcornArmy on September 09, 2010, 12:44:41 AM

[ Spoilers for Changes ]
(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Serack on September 10, 2010, 01:25:08 PM
2 questions (I haven't read the whole topic)

Did you come up with the Knights of the Cross, the Denarians/Lash, and the 3 distinct vampire courts with your initial overall story arc, or did you come up with them as you fleshed out the individual books?

Also, is it possible for a mortal to utilize hellfire/soulfire without demonic/holy patronage?

Edit: changed 2nd question to be more broad...
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: sjsharks on September 10, 2010, 02:06:44 PM
[ Spoilers for Changes ]
(click to show/hide)

(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Shecky on September 10, 2010, 02:50:20 PM
(click to show/hide)


This is an inference (albeit one that I personally prefer), which is why AA would like to ask the question to clarify the situation.
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: aikidoka on September 29, 2010, 04:07:43 PM
A question for Jim regarding the Barabbus curse.  How many times can Nic mandate a death with the curse?  Are there any limitations on who can be targeted and how many times a person can be targeted?  Inquiring minds want to know, though mostly just I want to know.
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Magnus on September 29, 2010, 04:58:37 PM
Nah, after talking in the killing Nic thread I want to know that as well. Something else that I also want to know since I saw some people discussing the possibility some time back.

Can you use the NeverNever to travel to other planets (or does each planet have it's own NeverNever)?
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: nthnclls on September 29, 2010, 07:11:13 PM
Nah, after talking in the killing Nic thread I want to know that as well. Something else that I also want to know since I saw some people discussing the possibility some time back.

Can you use the NeverNever to travel to other planets (or does each planet have it's own NeverNever)?

I would assume that since the nevernever is an alternate universe (sort of), you could travel to other planets.
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Icecream on October 03, 2010, 12:39:36 AM
where does all the pizza go???
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Murphy's Stunt Double on October 03, 2010, 02:51:10 AM
I ate it. *hic* *burp*
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: sjsharks on October 05, 2010, 03:14:19 AM
I have two questions

1.) What is a Chlorofiend? not the plant monster that Harry fights, but the thing that he remembers Bob talking about.

2.) What is the favorite type of pizza of the Fae? Pepperoni? Hawaiian? All meat? Vegetarian? Combination? Bean Curd?
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Richard_Chilton on October 06, 2010, 06:26:49 AM
Hi.  I've asked this question before and been pointed to various non-Jim posts, but I'd like to ask it here (and love it if Jim answered it):

Is the flavor text of the RPG Canon? I can see Jim disregarding the rule mechanics as he writes, but is the book filled with what Harry, Billy, and Bob believe the world to be (at the time of writing)?

Richard
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Magnus on October 06, 2010, 06:40:59 AM
Listen through these clips I know that in one of these clips he gets asked a question about the RPG canon and he answers that it is in character for the characters to say what they say.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bmlxwr29UmY

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FfG2ZIdYdr4

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=atQi6Qez3y8
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Serack on October 08, 2010, 10:05:38 AM
Hi.  I've asked this question before and been pointed to various non-Jim posts, but I'd like to ask it here (and love it if Jim answered it):

Is the flavor text of the RPG Canon? I can see Jim disregarding the rule mechanics as he writes, but is the book filled with what Harry, Billy, and Bob believe the world to be (at the time of writing)?

Richard

Here is the best answer to that question by Jim yet.  He goes into detail.

RPG info (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=atQi6Qez3y8) @4:24  I haven't transcribed it because I ran out of room on the compilation topic.

My newest question for JB:

Storm Front says that the White Council only uses one sword to carry out executions.  Obviously this is Morgan's, so my question is, does Morgan's sword predate Luccio?
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Dina on October 13, 2010, 04:25:29 AM
In "Grave Peril", at the party, Thomas said that Harry's godmother kiss him on the neck (and burned him). When I read it first, not knowing about Thomas-Harry relation, I found that very strange, out of the blue. Even the fact that Thomas knew that the Leanansidhe was Harry's godmother. But now I am thinking. Perhaps he made a pact with Lea to help Harry? (As Susan did).
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Warden John Marcone on October 14, 2010, 03:23:53 PM
I was looking over some of the WoJ's on the site and explained some of it to my mom when she asked about a couple of things.  Apologies if these have been asked all ready.

First, if Stoker and Lovecraft were "on to something", what about Mary Shelly?  Do Dr. Frankenstein's experiments exist in the DV and if so what happened to his Monster?

Second, who is Peter Pan?  NeverNever, Neverland, is there something going on here?
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Canicula on October 14, 2010, 08:00:33 PM
Jim, you mentioned that wizard "Listens-to-the-Wind was of the Illinois. That was a sizable confederacy
made up of a number of cognate tribes: Peoria, Kaskaskia, Michigamea, Cahokia, and Tamaroa, to name
the five most populous. Listens-to-the-Wind also spoke about the annihilation of his tribe because of his
refusal to intervene.

As one who has studied the Illiniwek in depth, I concluded that Listens-to-the-Wind spoke of one of three
battles: the devastation of Kaskaskia (Village) in 1680, the extermination of the Tamaroa sub-tribe shortly thereafter,
or the siege at Starved Rock.
Did LTW refer to one of these three historically recorded events or something lost through the ages?

This is the link to my Illini web site and the pertinent sub-unit: Scholarly citations are provided.

http://rfester.tripod.com/iroq.html
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: faithlessprophet on October 15, 2010, 07:27:28 AM
Im sorry if this sounds too much like im asking for info in the next book, but in the DV is it possible for a ghost to practice ectomancy?
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: stevem on October 15, 2010, 11:31:53 AM
Im sorry if this sounds too much like im asking for info in the next book, but in the DV is it possible for a ghost to practice ectomancy?
I think I recall WOJ to the effect that ghosts are merely psychic imprints or echoes.  If so, they don't think, are on auto-pilot and shouldn't be able to practice anything.
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: knnn on October 15, 2010, 12:10:46 PM
Not sure if I posted this here before, but I was really hoping to ask Jim this one had I met him at ComicCon.

It can easily take a frozen turkey over a minute to fall from an airplane flying at 30,000 feet, so was there a falling turkey already that the entropy curse diverted at the last minute, or does it actually somehow reach back in time to create the desired outcome at the right moment?
 
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: faithlessprophet on October 16, 2010, 05:40:05 AM
Quote
I think I recall WOJ to the effect that ghosts are merely psychic imprints or echoes.  If so, they don't think, are on auto-pilot and shouldn't be able to practice anything.

but according to Jim and the product info on the next book says
(click to show/hide)
therefore my question, lol
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: neofyte on October 16, 2010, 06:32:02 PM
Jim, you mentioned that wizard "Listens-to-the-Wind was of the Illinois. That was a sizable confederacy
made up of a number of cognate tribes: Peoria, Kaskaskia, Michigamea, Cahokia, and Tamaroa, to name
the five most populous. Listens-to-the-Wind also spoke about the annihilation of his tribe because of his
refusal to intervene.

As one who has studied the Illiniwek in depth, I concluded that Listens-to-the-Wind spoke of one of three
battles: the devastation of Kaskaskia (Village) in 1680, the extermination of the Tamaroa sub-tribe shortly thereafter,
or the siege at Starved Rock.
Did LTW refer to one of these three historically recorded events or something lost through the ages?

This is the link to my Illini web site and the pertinent sub-unit: Scholarly citations are provided.

http://rfester.tripod.com/iroq.html

Holy erudition, Batman. I am impressed!!!  Thank you =)
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: stevem on October 17, 2010, 07:16:00 AM
but according to Jim and the product info on the next book says
(click to show/hide)
therefore my question, lol
We'll have to wait and see but I suspect that Harry is not literally a ghost but his 'soul' is wandering about lose.  Pure conjecture on my part.
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: faithlessprophet on October 17, 2010, 08:05:33 AM
hmm, but if thats the case wouldnt he still have access to soulfire?
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: AcornArmy on October 17, 2010, 12:32:10 PM
hmm, but if thats the case wouldnt he still have access to soulfire?

Yeah, I've wondered about this myself. If angels can use soulfire, and angels are nothing but soul-- which, according to Bob, is the case-- then angels can use magic, since soulfire is a mixture of a soul's energy and magic. If Harry is a soul, and if his soul is structurally similar to an angel's soul, then it seems like he should also be capable of using magic, at least potentially. Maybe the problem in Ghost Story is less that he can't use it and more that using magic as a soul is different from using it as a living mortal, and he just doesn't know how to do it. Or maybe it's as simple as Harry not believing that he can use magic while he's a soul, which could effectively make him unable to do so.
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: ۞†Grey Warden†۞ on October 17, 2010, 04:39:09 PM
Yeah, I've wondered about this myself. If angels can use soulfire, and angels are nothing but soul-- which, according to Bob, is the case-- then angels can use magic, since soulfire is a mixture of a soul's energy and magic. If Harry is a soul, and if his soul is structurally similar to an angel's soul, then it seems like he should also be capable of using magic, at least potentially. Maybe the problem in Ghost Story is less that he can't use it and more that using magic as a soul is different from using it as a living mortal, and he just doesn't know how to do it. Or maybe it's as simple as Harry not believing that he can use magic while he's a soul, which could effectively make him unable to do so.


Actually i think soulfire is completely different from magic. It feeds into to magic rather than the other way around. I bet the angels don't use magic, because remember when michael told harry that magic was evil/unholy
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: AcornArmy on October 17, 2010, 05:44:43 PM
Actually i think soulfire is completely different from magic. It feeds into to magic rather than the other way around. I bet the angels don't use magic, because remember when michael told harry that magic was evil/unholy

Bob describes soulfire this way:

Quote from: Small Favor, Ch. 45
“So what you’re saying is that this hand construct was made out of my soul,” I said.

“Your soul and your magic fused together, yeah,” Bob said. “Your soul converted into energy. Soulfire. In this case, the spirit energy drawn from your aura right around your right hand, because it fit the construct so well, it being a big version of your right hand and all. Your standard force-projection spell formed around the matrix of soulfire, and what had been an instantaneous exertion of force became a long-term entity capable of manipulation and exertion to the same degree. Not really more powerful than just the force spell, as much as it was more than simply the force spell.”

There are two different interpretations of this, as far as I can see. The first is that soulfire is made directly from the energy of the soul, and then the magic forms around it. And second, that soulfire is itself the combination of magic and soul energy, so that any spell performed with soulfire can essentially be called a soulfire spell, rather than a magic spell laced with soulfire.

The first description fits with the last part of Bob's description, but not as much with the beginning. The second description fits the beginning what Bob says, but seems harder to understand when combined with the last half of his description.

In my opinion, the way Bob begins his description seems simplest and most likely to be what he meant-- soulfire is "your soul and your magic fused together." When he says later that the force-projection spell formed around a matrix of soulfire, it sounds to me like he's saying that the spell itself took shape around the matrix of soulfire, not that the magic alone took shape around the soulfire. Which seems like it would mean that when you use soulfire, you kind of use the soulfire in place of magic, since the soulfire already has magic fused into it. Whereas normally you would use magic to cast a spell, with soulfire, you fuse soul energy and magic together to create soulfire, then use the soulfire to cast the spell.

At least, that's what it sounds like to me. I could be wrong.
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: ۞†Grey Warden†۞ on October 17, 2010, 05:51:05 PM
That does make sense.

Btw how do you say Quote from: yoda or whatever when not pushing the quote button
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Myyrdn Eopia on October 17, 2010, 05:54:23 PM
[ quote author=BLABLABLABLA ]

like so:

Quote from: BLABLABLA
Bla.
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: ۞†Grey Warden†۞ on October 17, 2010, 05:56:24 PM
Quote from:  Harry
Did i do it right

Quote from:  Me
Yep and thanks Myyrdn Eopia
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: faithlessprophet on October 17, 2010, 08:01:48 PM
Quote
At least, that's what it sounds like to me. I could be wrong.

see thats what i was thinking, which is why i was wondering about the ectomancy as well, the fusing of the two even for
(click to show/hide)
would be potent
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: rezilm on October 18, 2010, 03:39:35 PM
For some reason this has bothered me recently.

Why, over the past decade, has Harry never 'gazed Murphy?
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: faithlessprophet on October 18, 2010, 09:36:14 PM
For some reason this has bothered me recently.

Why, over the past decade, has Harry never 'gazed Murphy?

he did when they first met, its been said a few times, but she insisted on it
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: KevinSig on October 18, 2010, 11:28:03 PM
Has Jim said if Rich (Murphy's Ex/Brother-in-Law)
(click to show/hide)

I'd like to know if anything happened with Rich.  I mean, yes Jim has only used him in 2 books, but I'd figure he & the other members of the Murphy clan might come back into play eventually

Kevin
Of course, my evil half
(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Landing on October 18, 2010, 11:45:59 PM
he did when they first met, its been said a few times, but she insisted on it

Uh, no you must be thinking of Michael, Harry has never soul gazed Murphy.

As for the reason why he has not, I would expect it is for the same reason you don't strap someone down on the therapist couch and force them to tell you all their inner most feelings and thoughts. Its just plane rude to force someone into having a soul gaze if they choose not to have one (like Murphy seems to) and its not something you really want to go around doing with everyone anyways.
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Dina on October 19, 2010, 03:21:01 AM
Or perhaps you are thinking on Elaine (they soulgaze her first night togoether) or Susan (she deceived him to look into her eyes). I think he doesn't want to soulgaze Murphy because he is very unsecure and also because it is not polite. It is something worse than reading a personal Diary.
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: rezilm on October 19, 2010, 03:34:06 AM
I suppose. To take it in more of a fourth wall breaking way though. Everyone else around him has either forced him, tricked him, or accidentally soulgazed him. He does it at least once a book.

He even tries to 'gaze murphy in Grave Peril, but she's lost in the Nightmare.

I just wonder what her soulgaze would look like.
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Dina on October 19, 2010, 03:40:38 AM
I wonder what HIS soulgaze would look like.
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: AcornArmy on October 19, 2010, 01:45:29 PM
I wonder what HIS soulgaze would look like.

Me too. Although, at this point, Harry seems to be rather wary of finding out, because he's noted that almost everyone who soulgazes him seems to be kind of stunned by the experience.

I suppose. To take it in more of a fourth wall breaking way though. Everyone else around him has either forced him, tricked him, or accidentally soulgazed him. He does it at least once a book.

Everyone except for Molly, I think. He asked her to let him soulgaze her, and she let him do it, so it was something they both chose willingly. And the same might be said for Thomas, too, though Thomas seemed somewhat reluctant to agree, until Harry basically said it was the only way that he would believe Thomas was his brother.
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: faithlessprophet on October 20, 2010, 02:51:53 AM
yall are correct, i was mixing murph and micheal in my head,i apollogize
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Serack on October 22, 2010, 09:52:06 AM
Can you describe Free will from Bob's perspective?
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Icecream on October 22, 2010, 10:15:56 AM
I suppose. To take it in more of a fourth wall breaking way though. Everyone else around him has either forced him, tricked him, or accidentally soulgazed him. He does it at least once a book.

He even tries to 'gaze murphy in Grave Peril, but she's lost in the Nightmare.

I just wonder what her soulgaze would look like.

I think we'll get to see the Harry/Murphy soulgaze in GS or soon. Wh
(click to show/hide)
and obviously he can't soulgaze anyone he's soulgazed before (maybe?) so it has to be building up to this. I don't think they'll soulgaze to get a measure of eachother , because they already know what the other's all about, it'll have to be something as a last resort ,the most practical thing . Ugh i hope that made sense,i'm not logical this late at night.
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: mimicgogo on October 29, 2010, 04:02:16 PM
First, if Stoker and Lovecraft were "on to something", what about Mary Shelly?  Do Dr. Frankenstein's experiments exist in the DV and if so what happened to his Monster?

This is basically the question I wanted to ask, but I'll expand a little bit...Are there any other notable "fiction" authors who got killed for their works?  My short list includes Aesop, the Grimms, H.G. Wells and especially Tolkien and C.S. Lewis.  The "between worlds" place featured in "The Magician's Nephew" sounds awful Neverneverish.
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: AcornArmy on October 29, 2010, 04:26:27 PM
Jim,

Bob mentioned early on in the series that Elaine was always better than Harry at magic, more naturally skilled. Later, Elaine complimented Harry on his shield and told him she wasn't sure she could have done as good a job. Since then, Harry's skill has presumably progressed further by teaching Molly.

Is Elaine still more skilled than Harry at this point, or has he caught up with her or surpassed her?
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: stevem on October 30, 2010, 02:09:31 AM
Is Elaine still more skilled than Harry at this point, or has he caught up with her or surpassed her?
I've always considered Harry a bit of an obsesive-compulsive.  IMO, to the extent that Elaine has more talent, Harry has: 1) more raw muscle; and, is incredibly more focused on improving, considering his life experiences to date.
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Kuvasza on October 30, 2010, 03:48:21 AM
I've always considered Harry a bit of an obsesive-compulsive.  IMO, to the extent that Elaine has more talent, Harry has: 1) more raw muscle; and, is incredibly more focused on improving, considering his life experiences to date.
Harry is going to grow into a more impressive wizard, over time, for that reason.  The best engineers and mathematicians I know took home books on non-linear math and read them for *fun*.  Harry is into this stuff.  Elaine I think has issues and while I see her as talented, she seems more likely to plateau.

On the other hand, she might be so thoroughly traumatized by her experience at the hands of Justin and so driven to make certain she is never a victim again that she adheres to a fanatic regimen of study and self-improvement.  A bit like the medical student whose close friend died of cancer who studies fanatically to enter into med school and/or to work as a research scientist.  Highly motivated.
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: AcornArmy on October 30, 2010, 04:51:16 AM
On the other hand, she might be so thoroughly traumatized by her experience at the hands of Justin and so driven to make certain she is never a victim again that she adheres to a fanatic regimen of study and self-improvement.  A bit like the medical student whose close friend died of cancer who studies fanatically to enter into med school and/or to work as a research scientist.  Highly motivated.

Elaine may also be motivated by a sense of competition with Harry. She definitely still seems to be influenced by him and his life choices, enough that she imitates him professionally. Like him, she's in the phone book, under "Wizards," and she's the same mix of wizard and P.I. She seems to take the same kinds of cases he would take, and help people like he would. Whether it's subconscious or not, I think maybe she's trying to emulate Harry a little. That kind of emulation could carry over into a sense of competition, and she did get a chance to see that Harry's skill was improving over time.

That said, though, Harry may have an advantage in increasing his skills that Elaine doesn't have: Harry has been teaching Molly for years now. He attributes much of his increased skill to having to teach her, and it's easy to see that in the later books. His improved skill with veils, for instance, came from the fact that Molly is so good with them, and Harry felt like he needed to be passably good with them himself just to be able to keep teaching her about them. Not to mention other things that he's said about the teaching process, about how teaching someone else the basics has made him go over them again himself, appreciating and understanding them on a deeper level than he did before.

And aside from teaching Molly, he's also been teaching Warden recruits over the years. Just being placed in a position of instructor has forced him to develop his skills to the level of an instructor. I'd guess that this has moved his skill level quite a bit beyond where someone of his age would normally be. I know he still thinks of himself as a magical thug, but the reality is probably more that he's far more skillful than wizards of his age would usually be.

And that was before he got the Winter Knight mantle. He seemed to be throwing around an awful lot of cold-based magic, pretty much as soon as he took the job. His thoughts seemed to run in that direction without him even having to work at it. Who knows what that could indicate about his skills with that sort of magic now? Whereas before he would instinctively use fire, now he seems to instinctively use cold magic, while still retaining his abilities with fire.
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: ۞†Grey Warden†۞ on October 30, 2010, 04:51:57 AM
Jim, how was your birthday?
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: snowbank on October 30, 2010, 10:59:54 PM
Elaine may also be motivated by a sense of competition with Harry.

It may be she didn't know what else to do, so imitated Harry just to have a job. I agree Harry's teaching experiences forced him to get better, but I'd also include access to Bob as a real bonus for Harry. I think Harry is flat out stronger, with less control, but I think he's gained a lot of control and would be more powerful than Elaine, except for possible sneakiness/deception on her part.
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: AcornArmy on October 31, 2010, 02:35:53 AM
It may be she didn't know what else to do, so imitated Harry just to have a job. I agree Harry's teaching experiences forced him to get better, but I'd also include access to Bob as a real bonus for Harry. I think Harry is flat out stronger, with less control, but I think he's gained a lot of control and would be more powerful than Elaine, except for possible sneakiness/deception on her part.

Yeah, that's true. I think about what a huge advantage Bob is fairly often, but I hardly ever remember to mention it when considering Harry's skill improvements. Bob was obviously indispensable while Harry was creating Little Chicago, for instance, and I have to wonder how much input he had while Harry was creating his new shield bracelet, or while Harry was designing things like his new lab circle. And that's not even considering the gradual, daily accumulation of information which Harry gains from having Bob to talk to. And Harry likely would've been dead many times over, over the course the series, if he hadn't had Bob to go to for information about whichever new thing was threatening his existence that week.
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Warden John Marcone on November 01, 2010, 03:35:43 PM
Jim, how was your birthday?

Suckup.  I wish I had thought of that.
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Icecream on November 04, 2010, 06:20:13 AM
was "injun joe" nekkid when he transforms in TC because the alphas always are.?
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: tiny[but]fierce on November 04, 2010, 12:58:08 PM
was "injun joe" nekkid when he transforms in TC because the alphas always are.?

LOL. Probably not. Harry didn't have a foot-in-mouth moment when Joe finished fighting off Shagnasty, and Joe is Native American. The type of shifting that Joe did has nothing to do with the spell that the Alphas use when they shift. Not to mention, the spell that the Alphas use only shifts them into werewolf mode, and Joe can shift into other creatures at will.
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Icecream on November 05, 2010, 05:41:28 AM
Yeah but I don't think it specifically mentions what happens to his clothes though. Maybe Harry could make magic transformity clothes for the alphas.
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: ۞†Grey Warden†۞ on November 05, 2010, 05:43:28 AM
Suckup.  I wish I had thought of that.

It's not like he actually answers these
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Shecky on November 05, 2010, 10:43:03 AM
It's not like he actually answers these

He has. He's just busy.
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: ۞†Grey Warden†۞ on November 05, 2010, 04:13:07 PM
Oh I didn't mean any against him but has he actually posted in this thread?
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Magnus on November 05, 2010, 04:15:36 PM
Oh I didn't mean any against him but has he actually posted in this thread?
I don't think he has posted in this one but he has posted in the earlier parts, and sometimes he replies in other topics in the forum ;)
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: ۞†Grey Warden†۞ on November 05, 2010, 04:17:11 PM
gotcha
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: AcornArmy on November 05, 2010, 08:10:51 PM
I think he used to post here more often, but not so much in recent years, that I've seen. Maybe because there are so many questions from readers these days that it would be tough to keep up with all of them.
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: tiny[but]fierce on November 05, 2010, 09:58:48 PM
Not to mention, as soon as he posts, and the forum goers cotton on to that fact, they go haring after him for answers. Which he never fully answers. Or if he does answer, he leaves it open-ended to a million forms of interpretation... which you'd think we'd remember by this point :-\
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: horsehearted on November 05, 2010, 11:04:53 PM
It's not like he actually answers these

Mr. Butcher sneaks into the forum like a NINJA and posts in a couple different places before anyone realizes, then there is a rush to get to those threads, and then Mr. Butcher tends to leave after answering a few questions and responding to a few comments. He's been busy, he made a lot of con appearances and added Side Jobs to his schedule this year. I figured he wouldn't be here in a while. And for about a month after he's made an appearance people are all abuzz and on very best behavior hoping to spot him again.

He definitely does bop into his forum to see how things are here, pats his rabid fans on the head, and hand out a tidbit of information that leaves us completely confused and ravenous for more.
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: tiny[but]fierce on November 06, 2010, 12:33:26 AM
Mr. Butcher sneaks into the forum like a NINJA and posts in a couple different places before anyone realizes, then there is a rush to get to those threads, and then Mr. Butcher tends to leave after answering a few questions and responding to a few comments. He's been busy, he made a lot of con appearances and added Side Jobs to his schedule this year. I figured he wouldn't be here in a while. And for about a month after he's made an appearance people are all abuzz and on very best behavior hoping to spot him again.

He definitely does bop into his forum to see how things are here, pats his rabid fans on the head, and hand out a tidbit of information that leaves us completely confused and ravenous for more.


^^^^

This.
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Serack on November 12, 2010, 02:35:04 PM
Ok I went over all the questions (some I mighta missed while skimming since there is so much banter in this topic) and found all the ones that have relevant WoJ's (edit:  relevent =/= were answered).  Most of these that had answers were old ones so the posters might already be aware of the answers.


Was Harry's Grandmother (
(click to show/hide)
) a Wizard? Or rather, did she have any magical talent at all?

2010 Mysterious Galaxy Q&A (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=96KFFdwq6Gg&playnext_from=TL&videos=H20Ll3frNlA)
Do you have it planned out who Harry's grandmother is? @6:05
Yes... Well she's not alive any more.
Was she significant?
Well, she was a mortal.  That was about it.


Love the books, even though Changes was a little traumatic. What can you tell us about what happens next without giving too much away?

2010 Dragon-Con (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0_CEAHF6a-Q) @5:15
Can you give us a teaser for Ghost Story?
Ghost story is so named because Dresden gets stuck with solving his own murder.  He actually gets sent back to handle it, except there's no body available, so he has to do it as a ghost.  Dresden has to deal with all the laws of being a supernatural spirit, and a ghost from the other end of the stick.  Which I have a really great time with because he's so non-competent at that.  One of my favorite bits so far is when he's learning the basic ghost stuff and he's like, "You know, I finally understand why it is that ghosts are always howling and moaning when they appear out of the floor or the wall.  Passin through that stuff hurts."
 SFBC @ 2010 NYCC (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zI1VQoPGT7I) @1:31
Could you share a little bit of what’s in store for Dresden in Ghost Story
In Ghost Story, it’s the 13th book of the series, Harry gets sent back to Chicago as a ghost.  He has to solve his own murder, and if he doesn’t there’s going to be horrible consequences to the people he loves.  So we get to see Chicago through a slightly different lens as Dresden is coming back as a ghost.  Of course the real problem is that as that with 12 books going before him with various bad guys coming to mess around in Chicago, Harry has left a few ghosts around the city himself, and you know they are looking for some payback.  It’s kinda like what happens when the cop gets sent to jail.  


Why aren't vampire predator spirits left at the door when they cross a threshold? I mean, if the human part of Thomas can die with the demon part staying alive, why not the other way around?

2010 Lee’s Summit signing (http://www.jimbutcheronline.com/bb/index.php/topic,11734.msg780995.html#msg780995)
 Q:  Are the White Court affected by thresholds?
A:  Not really, they’re too mortal.  But they might be affected if they were mostly vamped out when trying to cross a threshold.


Hey Jim, saw you at the 'Changes' signing in SoCal & forgot to ask you about this.

Way back in 'Death Masks (??) Shiro mentioned a 'Jade Court' of vampires. Will we ever get to 'see' them? All we got was that one little reference & I've been wondering about them ever since.

2010 Huston signing (http://www.jimbutcheronline.com/bb/index.php/topic,11734.msg772851.html#msg772851):
Q:  Do you have any plans for the Jade Court to show up?
A:  The Jade Court is adamantly not involved.  They are very busy being not involved.


Here's a question: Aside from that brief glimpse (not even a glimpse really) of her in SK, is Titania ever going to make herself known the way Mab constantly does? It just occurred to me when I reread Small Favor that we've met all of the Sidhe Queens except, officially, for her.
 

2009 Independence signing (http://www.jimbutcheronline.com/bb/index.php/topic,11734.msg538824.html#msg538824):
Q:  Harry’s met all the other ladies-queens-mothers - will we ever actually meet Titania?
A:  The thing is, Titania’s only interest is messing with Harry.

2010 Bitten by Books Q&A (http://bittenbybooks.com/?p=22804):
#399 “We’ve met and spent time with 5 out of the 6 fairy queens. Is there a specific reason that you’ve kept Harry from a face to face with Titania? Other than of course the obvious reason that she wants him dead.”
Yes. :D

2010 Powell's books Q&A off of Youtube (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0nxHxfB_ElU) @4:18
Are we ever going to get to meet Titania?
Yes... but it's going to be a while, probably not until the last three books.  She's heavy duty.


New question for Jim:
Did Harry name his foundling kitten after Mister Mistoffeles from the play Cats?
After all, that Mister has a magic/stage illusion theme...

I didn’t transcribe this WoJ out, but there is an audio interview somewhere where Jim says that he used to participate in a chat room back in the 90’s that had a guy in it that had a cat that would walk on his keyboard and randomly have him post something like “iozueas,xoagazxcda” and his cat’s name was Mister.  It got to the point where if anyone accidentally posted gibberish, the rest of the chat room would say “Hi Mister.”  Mister is named after that cat.  Interestingly enough Mickey Finn also participated in that chat room before and after Jim did, and recognized where the name came from before he became a beta.  (here’s a link to the post where Mickey said that (http://www.jimbutcheronline.com/bb/index.php/topic,19545.msg915962.html#msg915962), the post establishes that the chat was a text based rpg or something)


Okay, so House Raith feeds on sexual energy, and people affected by true love burns them. Is the entirety of the White Court affected by love the way the Raith clan is, or is it different for Malvora and Skavis? Because for Skavis, the opposite of despair is technically hope...

2009 Bitten by Books Q&A (http://bittenbybooks.com/?p=6529):
#62 “You’ve said that True Love (real True Love) only protects against WCVamps feeding on lust. What protects against the other WCVamps?”
It isn’t real complicated that way. The vamps who feed on fear get bad effects from real courage. Those who feed on despair choke on hope. :)


'Nother question - who is Jim's favorite "hero" and "villian" to write excluding Harry?

2009 Lexington signing (http://www.jimbutcheronline.com/bb/index.php/topic,11734.msg504484.html#msg504484):
Q:  Jim’s favorite recurring villain?
A:  Marcone, when he’s being a villain.  And Nicodemus, because he is pure evil.


As the Blackstaff we know Eb can break the laws of magic, has he ever brought someone back from the dead?

Doesn’t answer your question, but here’s a WoJ that certainly is pertinent (and possibly prophetic)
Quote from: WoJ response pertaining to DFTV Bob
Ah.  But what did he have to DO to ressurect his dead love, is the question.  Bob says "he crossed the line.  Several times."  And while the magic isn't being depicted from the same angle as the books, there /are/ several similarities in the rules that govern magic, one of which is: you don't get something for nothing.  The forces of magic exist in balance.  I mean, if you want to bring back someone from the dead, it's only reasonable that someone /else/ must . . .
(source (http://www.jimbutcheronline.com/bb/index.php/topic,2130.msg44024.html#msg44024))
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Icecream on November 23, 2010, 11:01:25 AM
Someone's probably already asked this ..but i'm too lazy to read through the pages.

what's happened to harry's cleaning crew , did they have to clean up the mess after changes?  :)
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Infovore on November 23, 2010, 12:00:35 PM
Hopefully I'm posting this in the right place. I think this is a question for Jim, although it may have already been answered somewhere and I just didn't find it. If so, sorry!

I've just finished reading Side Jobs and my question is about the story "Last Call". Is the title of the story a nod towards the Tim Powers book of the same name?

My thinking is that the novel Last Call is related to
(click to show/hide)
and the sequel explicitly mentions both
(click to show/hide)


(I've marked as spoiler's above. I read the policy and don't think this is a spoiler but, I wanted to err on the side of caution)

In my head the connection just jumped out, of course that could quite easily just be in my head … ;)
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Kysk on December 03, 2010, 11:54:38 PM
Regarding Justins potential Death Curse...

Quote from: the neurovore of Zur-En-Aargh
"Or his death curse was something subtle Harry did not notice."


"From here on you shall ALWAYS take cold showers!"

Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: cass on December 04, 2010, 03:43:07 AM
Regarding Justins potential Death Curse...


"From here on you shall ALWAYS take cold showers!"



unending guilt & self-recrimination?
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Kysk on December 04, 2010, 07:25:48 PM
Dear mr Butcher and anyone else reading this,

I am practicing posting as I have  hardly ever been using this (or any other) forum before. How fortuitous that I have a whole bunch of questions (to be answered if/when you have the time and/or inclination of course)! Here is a warm up one:


How does Justine feel now?

When Harry met Justine in Bianca's laundry room she was mad with too much feelings. To me it seemed as if she had had that problem before and being with Thomas made it better. I got the feeling that this was one of the things that made her so attractive to Thomas from the start, for a creature who feeds on emotions a person like that must be like an all-you-can-eat free buffé. No one feeds on her now, as she is protected by True Love, but does she still have her emotional problems? Or did the huge chunk of her life that Thomas ripped out of her cure that?

Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: sjsharks on December 05, 2010, 06:53:20 AM
Dear mr Butcher and anyone else reading this,

I am practicing posting as I have  hardly ever been using this (or any other) forum before. How fortuitous that I have a whole bunch of questions (to be answered if/when you have the time and/or inclination of course)! Here is a warm up one:


How does Justine feel now?

When Harry met Justine in Bianca's laundry room she was mad with too much feelings. To me it seemed as if she had had that problem before and being with Thomas made it better. I got the feeling that this was one of the things that made her so attractive to Thomas from the start, for a creature who feeds on emotions a person like that must be like an all-you-can-eat free buffé. No one feeds on her now, as she is protected by True Love, but does she still have her emotional problems? Or did the huge chunk of her life that Thomas ripped out of her cure that?



According to Justine she is on medication, although I think that there is more to it then we are told. And Jim has also said that Thomas and Justine are happier then ever after Turn Coat.
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Dina on December 05, 2010, 07:47:56 AM
JB said that? Weird. I though Justine would be sad about Thomas.
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: sjsharks on December 05, 2010, 08:19:35 PM
JB said that? Weird. I though Justine would be sad about Thomas.

2010 Mysterious Galaxy Q&A @5:10
Are Thomas and Justine ever going to have a happily ever after?
Thomas and Justine's relationship is really weird.  I know what the relationship is in my head like right now.  Their actually happier now than they've been in ever.  But it's all happening behind the scenes and nobody can see because Thomas has to have his bad ass vampire face on whenever he's in public.  But when they are alone together, nothing else going on, their like totally cute.  Justine wears like these grownup version of footie pajamas so that she can snuggle up next to him on the couch and watch TV without actually burning him.  They don't have like a normal relationship or anything like one, but they've kinda adjusted, their fairly happy.  You don't go around letting the other vampires go "Oh how cute."  I'll have to get to that one of these days, Harry doesn't see that.
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Dina on December 05, 2010, 08:43:35 PM
Aw, thanks! That means that Thomas is more his older self that what he shows. That is really good!
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Tigris on December 06, 2010, 05:51:25 AM
That's good to know because what happened to him in TC made me so mad and sad, it's nice to know that him and Justine are happy. :)
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: faithlessprophet on December 06, 2010, 11:59:58 PM
Jim - I just reread SF for the first time in years, and i just realized that had Harry not lied to Murph about knowing the girl who died, they might have actually hooked up early on, is this a valid theory?
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Kysk on December 22, 2010, 06:42:13 PM
Thank you so much for the pointers the answer to my last question! Here is a new one:

In SmF, Harry talks about how the Swords of the Knights of the Cross can be destroyed if someone picks them up when they are, as Lea puts it, ownerless. Destroyed as in not only rendered powerless, but also melted or shattered or otherwise made unable to function as swords normally should.

What does it take for the church to be able to destroy the coins? Not just make a bearer give them up and the fallen to loose it's power over them, but actually, physically destroy the coins?
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Kysk on December 22, 2010, 07:06:30 PM
How is Gard's name supposed to be pronounced?

In James Marster's reading in the audiobook it is pronounced similarly to the english word "guard", but when I saw it I thought it would be more like the scandinavian "Gerd" or "Gärd". I do not know the phonetics for this, but in Swedish it begins with a j-sound and then a long e but further to the front of your mouth and with your tongue flat to the bottom of it than what you would have when you said e in english (kind of like when you say "eh.." because you don't know what else to say), then an r that is almost silent (depending on the dialect) and then a d.

It would be interesting to know which one of the Valkyries she is (even though she might be none of the famous ones). I have not found anyone with that name, the only one I know of in the Asir sagas who goes by that name is the female giant (giantess?) who marries Frej. However, Gärd as a name means "protection", so it would be an apt name for her (the Dresden Files Character, that is).
Gärd as a word is a form of tax though :p
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Kysk on December 22, 2010, 07:35:12 PM
On the power of a name (This question have been up before, but I did not find an answer to it):

Can you gain power over someone by giving them a name?

That knowing someone's name gives you power over them is pretty well established, but how much power do you get over someone by giving them a name? Wether it be their full, "real" name like a parent naming their child, or a nickname that the person starts to identify themselves with. Is there a difference?

Harry calls Bob back from being creepy Kemler secretary to being nice, albeit pervy, Harry secretary by reminding him of the name Harry gave him. This implies that it should grant you some measure of power, even if he might not be able to force Bob into doing something only using that name it clearly touched him, reached him, in a significant way.

Is it different for beings of a more "spiritual inclination" than humans? They do not change their names as humans do, are they also more sensitive to given names than humans? Or less? Titles seems more important to them, for example you can call upon Mab by naming her the "Queen of Air and Darkness".

What about the Archive, where on the scale does she fit? She got her name, her only name as far as we know, from Harry. But she is human. Not that I think Harry would do anything with it (not that I think he could either, considering the amount of power she has, but let's say we take that imbalance away), but if he wanted to, could he then? Could he conjure her by it for example?  Or do anything along the lines of what that dragon did at Bianca's masquerade?
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Kysk on December 22, 2010, 07:42:10 PM
On souls:

Does animals have souls?
The question was called for when Harry could not see a soul in Tera West. According to Harry's theory she is a wolf which transforms herself into a human (Which makes me happy, as my favorite scene in any Eddings book is when Poldara sees Belgarath transform himself, tilts her head and says "So that's how you do it" and promptly turns herself human).

Now, if that is true, does it mean that;
a) animals in the Dresdenverse do not have souls. End of discussion.
b) animals do have souls, but they are different from human souls and can therefore not be seen by Harry and other humans, i.e. a soulgaze can only happen between individuals of the same species. In that case, does it take a "talanted" wolf to soulgaze another wolf?

What does it take to get a soul? "Mortal" seem to be one of the requirements, or at least it can be loosely used as a synonym to "someone with a soul". Animals can die, and do so frequently for perfectly natural reasons. Are they mortals then?

Can you create a ghost from something that does not have a soul? Is emotion alone sufficient?

I am quite sure Harry does not have the answer to these questions, but it is always fun to speculate.
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Kysk on December 22, 2010, 07:50:18 PM
On traveling in the Nevernever:

Even though the beings of the Nevernever seem to be hopelessly behind the changes in the human world, the Nevernever itself seems to be quite malleable to mortal will and emotion.
The roads of the Nevernever are bound to those of ours by mood or emotions.
The roads of the Nevernever occasionally change.
What then happens when the "mood" of a place changes in the mortal world, say a neighborhood that starts out as modern and popular to the upper crust and then degrades into slum, or opposite, slum that gets cleaned up and repaired? Or a playground or a fair where a murder takes place? Does the roads in the Nevernever change because the mortal world changes, or does the mortal world change because it is suddenly connected to a new part of the Nevernever?
In the extreme: could a sufficiently strong wizard use his or her ability to affect the Nevernever to also change things in our world?

Even the laws of magic in our world sometimes change (according to Bob at least) - so, related sidetrack: do they change in the Nevernever at the same time? Or before or after? Are they at any point different in the Nevernever than in this world, or can you always rely on the same algorithms in both places if you are a wizard?


According to Harry's working model of the Nevernever it seems as if it is our world that "takes the lead" and changes first, but his model focuses heavily on human emotions and several of the beings living in the Nevernever are many times older than the human species (is my impression). Did they live in the Nevernever before we came too? How was the Nevernever connected to our world then?

Or have I gotten this backwards?
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Lothy on December 22, 2010, 07:51:02 PM
But when they are alone together, nothing else going on, their like totally cute.  Justine wears like these grownup version of footie pajamas so that she can snuggle up next to him on the couch and watch TV without actually burning him.

FEAR THE POWER OF THE FOOTIE PAJAMA

Yes, I actually do own a footie pajama(s?). It is very cozy.
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Kysk on December 22, 2010, 07:51:30 PM
unending guilt & self-recrimination?

That would be a pretty potent and sneaky death curse indeed :S
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Dina on December 23, 2010, 12:24:56 AM
How is Gard's name supposed to be pronounced?


I've never thought of that. For me, it's like "Gardener", without the ending.
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Serack on December 24, 2010, 03:28:56 PM
Kysk, if you haven't gotten a chance yet you should check out the DF WoJ compilation also stickied in the spoiler section.  It's linked in my sig as well.  In it is a link to Jim's answer to your bolded question below

Thank you so much for the pointers the answer to my last question! Here is a new one:

In SmF, Harry talks about how the Swords of the Knights of the Cross can be destroyed if someone picks them up when they are, as Lea puts it, ownerless. Destroyed as in not only rendered powerless, but also melted or shattered or otherwise made unable to function as swords normally should.


What does it take for the church to be able to destroy the coins? Not just make a bearer give them up and the fallen to loose it's power over them, but actually, physically destroy the coins?


In the WoJ compilation under the section "Denarian's and fallen" the WoJ cited is a link to the forum posting
Destroying Denarian coins (+ Denarians are the elite of Hell/why their there) (http://www.jimbutcheronline.com/bb/index.php/topic,1143.msg20795.html#msg20795)

Jim's post there says:
Quote from: jimbutcher
Quote from: bob
It seems to me that as long as the Church has some of the coins, those paerticular Denarians are neutralized.  Doing a Mt Doom with the coins might free up the spirits housed within to act freely in the world.


Well.  Not quite freely, but MORE freely, certainly.  The Fallen bound in the coins are the freaking elite of Hell--everyone the big D didn't want trying to stab him in the back, basically.  If they were suddenly freed it would do all kinds of horrible things to about a million balances of power, with repercussions that would last for centuries.

Which assumes that they /can/ be destroyed.  I mean, don't think that in 2,000 years, no one has ever TRIED it.  And there are still thirty of them kicking around.

Which isn't necessarily to say that it's impossible.  But it sure as Hell wouldn't be easy.  And given that, while in the coins, they ARE effectively frozen in carbonite without a human agent to assist them, containment certainly seems to be a prudent course.

Funny you should mention that whole notion about redeeming Lasciel . . . > :)

Jim

Sorry that I don't have WoJ responses to any of your other great questions.  However here is a post I started back in August (http://www.jimbutcheronline.com/bb/index.php/topic,20593.msg903258.html#msg903258) that throughly discusses Harry's propensity to give characters names or nicknames which you might find interesting.  (on an aside, thanks for mentioning this stuff, it made me realize this post and a few others of my favorites are now locked and will eventually be wiped from the boards within a year of the last posting or so, so I saved them to my hard drive.)
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Kysk on December 24, 2010, 09:11:25 PM
Thanks Serack!

I kind of guessed that these subjects had been discussed here somewhere, but I didn't find them on my own... It's great that there are so many people here to ask!

I can see why you wouldn't want to destroy the coins, even if you could, and in a way it makes more sense that they are more indestructible than the Swords. The Swords, after all, does not have anyone living in them. I was just kind of wondering what would be the coin equivalent of "betraying" the Swords. An act of truly altruistic goodness? Probably not (after all the road to Hell is paved and so on), but perhaps you see what I mean? But maybe that kind of reasoning does not apply to the coins.
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: faithlessprophet on December 27, 2010, 10:06:34 AM
Jim, will Toot-Toot and/or the rest of the Za Lord's guard ever get their own "short" story? hehe see what i did there?
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Doroga's Cousin on December 30, 2010, 07:47:15 PM
Is Cowl more than a psychotic power mongering lunatic?
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Skinwalker on December 31, 2010, 08:05:36 PM
What would it take to get the Archangels, or Heaven at all for that matter to get sufficiently provoked to get "involved" and I dont mean involved by handing soulfire to a reckless but well meaning young wizard. Would we ever get a chance to see "Jake" cut loose on somebody, anybody?
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: esprotra on January 01, 2011, 08:48:25 PM
Is it possible to use the NeverNever to get to the Moon or Mars or someone else like that?
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Doroga's Cousin on January 08, 2011, 08:03:05 PM
What would it take to get the Archangels, or Heaven at all for that matter to get sufficiently provoked to get "involved" and I dont mean involved by handing soulfire to a reckless but well meaning young wizard. Would we ever get a chance to see "Jake" cut loose on somebody, anybody?
I think seeing "Jake" cut loose would cause extreme imbalances. Remember, Jim has said that the last Archangel to so directly interfere with the mortal world's moral compass was about 90 degrees off true and he is rather notorious.
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Kysk on January 10, 2011, 05:37:40 PM
Is it possible to use the NeverNever to get to the Moon or Mars or someone else like that?

The question is "Would you WANT to use  the NeverNever to get to the Moon or Mars or someone else like that?". :p
Dangerous enough places in the real world, what would be their reflection in the spiritual one?

...that is actually a really good question. If the NeverNever is attached to this world by emotions, does it even touch those places then? Man has been on the moon, but not yet on Mars, and as far as we know there is nothing else living there either. And if the likeness between the NeverNever and the real world is built upon emotions only, perhaps the moon would be a place of great triumph (though probably some fear as well).
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: I am a book nerd on January 17, 2011, 04:49:59 AM
one question... How does harry do laundry? he can't use a washing machine and (i'm not sure, never had to use it) dry cleaning is expensive.   ???
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: cass on January 17, 2011, 05:19:38 PM
Harry probably does laundry-- either it got done by his Summer Court cleaning service, or Harry uses a laundromat.  Washing machines are not, in general, complex and overly reliant on delicate electronics. Or, rather, they don't have to be, and those at a laundromat probably wouldn't be.  Another alternative is that he could do his washing by hand. Yes, by hand-- they still sell mechanical 'washing machines' for use in a sink.
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: AcornArmy on January 17, 2011, 06:12:23 PM
Harry probably does laundry-- either it got done by his Summer Court cleaning service, or Harry uses a laundromat.  Washing machines are not, in general, complex and overly reliant on delicate electronics. Or, rather, they don't have to be, and those at a laundromat probably wouldn't be.  Another alternative is that he could do his washing by hand. Yes, by hand-- they still sell mechanical 'washing machines' for use in a sink.

The laundromats near me are set up so that you can pay an attendant to load the clothes into the machines, or watch your laundry for you, if you can't stay there yourself for hours. Harry might take his laundry to someplace with a similar system.
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Magnus on January 17, 2011, 06:15:13 PM
"You think the dry cleaner can get this out?"
(...)
"The last time I took something stained by a slime golem to a cleaner, the owner burned his place down the next day and tried to collect on the insurance."

(From the beginning of It's My Birthday Too)

So Harry has used dry cleaning at least once. ;)
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: nthnclls on January 18, 2011, 12:14:46 AM
Jim, will Toot-Toot and/or the rest of the Za Lord's guard ever get their own "short" story? hehe see what i did there?

Jim, will you ever write a short story from Toot-Toot's perspective? PLEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEZE?
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: LogicMouseLives on January 18, 2011, 01:21:19 AM
"You think the dry cleaner can get this out?"
(...)
"The last time I took something stained by a slime golem to a cleaner, the owner burned his place down the next day and tried to collect on the insurance."

(From the beginning of It's My Birthday Too)

So Harry has used dry cleaning at least once. ;)

Also, in Death Masks, (just after he got the fairy housekeeping service) when Susan comes back, she asks if someone else is living there, and when Harry says no, comments "Your clothes smell like fabric softener. You never use fabric softener." So I figured the Brownies were at least dealing with the day to day stuff, although apparently they won't touch Slime Golem stains either.  ;D

LML
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: jdjubinsky on January 27, 2011, 03:12:14 AM
Who was Remirez's master?
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Warden John Marcone on January 27, 2011, 08:32:26 PM
I thought it Luccio trained both Ramirez and Steed.
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: sjsharks on January 27, 2011, 11:52:12 PM
I thought it Luccio trained both Ramirez and Steed.

Luccio only trained Morgan as far as we know.
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Shecky on January 28, 2011, 01:13:24 AM
Ramirez? He trained under Graham Ashe. :D

(Highlander reference, for those playing the home game.)
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: whingnut on January 28, 2011, 01:19:13 AM
(Highlander reference, for those playing the home game.)

THERE CAN BE ONLY ONE!!!!!!!!!!!

you aint it  ;)
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Shecky on January 28, 2011, 01:21:19 AM
THERE CAN BE ONLY ONE!!!!!!!!!!!

you aint it  ;)

Ramirez should've been it. My only real grouse about the original movie.
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: whingnut on January 28, 2011, 01:26:30 AM
Ramirez should've been it. My only real grouse about the original movie.
we shall have to have a chat about that someday. pros and cons I think he was tired and basically LET Conner have it but I digress. I've no Idea who trained which wardens.
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Shecky on January 28, 2011, 01:47:30 AM
we shall have to have a chat about that someday. pros and cons I think he was tired and basically LET Conner have it but I digress. I've no Idea who trained which wardens.

Oh, I understand that wholly... but a Scot with a Swiss accent should NOT have been The One. :D

Okay, back on track. No, there's no official word out about who trained Ramirez.
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: magic penguin on February 04, 2011, 05:55:32 PM
I don't know if this has been asked already, because I didn't read all 27 pages
but will we ever find out about when Harry & Michael met?

It doesn't have to be a short story  although that would be awesome(understanding your time constraits
but a paragraph or two in a book would be great too.
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Icekommander on February 05, 2011, 06:15:54 PM
Has there been any thought to a book after the final trilogy, that discusses the various elements in the Dresdenverse (I'm thinking like the Rivan Codex for the Belgariad)
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Steve K3 on February 07, 2011, 11:01:38 PM
for JB-

over the last 6 months, I've been thru just about all of JBs novels-


both series are creative-beyond-belief;

these comments/ questions involve the DF only.

have come to appreciate their "grounding":
Conservation of energy being observed;
ties to legitimate myths/ legends;
characters related logically to each other.

looking forward to subtle shifting {?} of interactions between Harry and the powers-that-be.
(will really miss the interplay between H and his major immediate nemesis, but it's JB's works to handle as he chooses).

not at all clear how far DF  can go. JB's posts several years ago suggested 3 more novels. Later, a total of 20 was indicated.

Selfishly, I'd prefer that Jim's efforts be devoted to Dresden, as far as he can take it. I can appreciate that there may be creative limits, and other interests that Jim might wish to pursue.

Great stuff ! May the well never run dry !



Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Shecky on February 07, 2011, 11:11:10 PM
Steve, your selfishness is actually a little counterproductive for you; he keeps himself and his writing fresh by stepping away from a novel world regularly. TDF and Codex Alera both benefited greatly by this alternation (and if you haven't read Alera, now you have a way to fill at least part of the wait for Ghost Story!) - if he went all Dresden all the time, he'd be so heartily sick of Harry that he'd likely retire early.
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Steve K3 on February 08, 2011, 12:10:28 AM
I was being facetious, Shecky.
I've read just about EVERYTHING, some more than once. I kinda like the Codex series, but I'm REALLY drawn to DF
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: vultur on February 08, 2011, 01:27:00 AM
- At what point did the Red Court and White Council, given that they were originally from different continents, come into contact to the point where they were really relevant to each other / capable of seriously threatening each other's interests? Spanish Colonial era? Early US? Mexican-American War? Later?

-How long did it take, once that happened, for the Red King to begin prepping for the Vampire War? Were there centuries of more-or-less-peace, or was he preparing for war pretty much from the moment the White Council seriously registered on his radar screen?

- Does Mab gain power from the Accords the way Lea gains power from deals with artists?
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: niquerio on February 08, 2011, 08:09:19 PM
Will we be seeing Maggie Jr. in the future?
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Icecream on February 08, 2011, 08:34:34 PM
I was under the impression Harry and Elaine were about the same age. However when Harry is imagining her in his head (the last time he saw her) he imagines Elaine as a 19 year old ? Is elaine 3 years older than harr?
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Landing on February 08, 2011, 11:36:25 PM
I was under the impression Harry and Elaine were about the same age. However when Harry is imagining her in his head (the last time he saw her) he imagines Elaine as a 19 year old ? Is elaine 3 years older than harr?

this seems to imply that they are the same age.

Quote
“I don’t have any relatives. We were both adopted by the same guy, that’s all. We lived together, drove one another nuts, hit puberty together. Do the math.”

She nodded. “How long were you together?”

“Oh. Until we were about sixteen.”
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Icecream on February 08, 2011, 11:50:02 PM
I  will have to look it up again, but why would Harry be remembering Elaine as a 19 year old though ? Maybe I'm misremebering.
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Landing on February 09, 2011, 12:32:58 AM
Yeah, I think you are, when he was imagining her so he could contact her he was thinking of the image he had from their soulgaze. It doesn't mention 19 anywhere in that section that I could find.
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Icecream on February 09, 2011, 01:12:33 AM
bleh I must be mixing different parts of the book, where he says ,molly is 19 .
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Warden John Marcone on February 09, 2011, 07:19:28 PM
Here's one.  If Lovecraft is true, and Dracula is true, is Frankenstein true?  If so what happened to Dr Frankenstein's monster?
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Snowleopard on February 10, 2011, 07:15:15 PM
Here's one.  If Lovecraft is true, and Dracula is true, is Frankenstein true?  If so what happened to Dr Frankenstein's monster?

Given JB we may yet find out.
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: the neurovore of Zur-En-Aargh on February 11, 2011, 02:54:34 AM
Here's one.  If Lovecraft is true, and Dracula is true,

For "historical Drakul and Dracula are real like in RL and Stoker's Dracula is a natty bit of propaganda" values of true. Wasn't someone suggesting Kemmler as a Frankenstein riff a while ago ?
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: wardenferry419 on February 12, 2011, 04:39:39 PM
Is Cain and Abel important?
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Landing on February 14, 2011, 03:14:42 AM
here is a question that came up in another thread (I'm younking it directly from parthagenon)

Why does the ban on enthrallment still apply to nonhumans, while the Law prohibiting killing only applies to humans?

in other words can we get some more info about how the Law about Enthrallment come about and what it is there for?
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: sjsharks on February 14, 2011, 05:05:42 AM
here is a question that came up in another thread (I'm younking it directly from parthagenon)

Why does the ban on enthrallment still apply to nonhumans, while the Law prohibiting killing only applies to humans?

in other words can we get some more info about how the Law about Enthrallment come about and what it is there for?

But Harry does say (and I think you mentioned this in the other thread too) that the laws only apply to humans when talking about Toots name
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: sjsharks on February 14, 2011, 05:47:10 AM
How does one "get real married" and what exactly is pyramid sitting?
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Piotr1600 on February 14, 2011, 06:29:26 AM
How long was Bianca in Chicago prior to running into Harry?
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: TwentyOne on February 14, 2011, 07:56:11 AM
I hope I'm asking this in the right place! :-[

Browsing Amazon.com I noticed a new short story collection (Naked City: Tales of Urban Fantasy) with a story by Jim due out on July 5. Will this be a Dresden Files story? If so, will there be any problem having come out before Ghost Story, spoiler-wise? I'm fairly sure the dude on the cover is supposed to be Harry, but I could be wrong.
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: wardenferry419 on February 14, 2011, 09:38:26 AM
I think it's an older story that has been delayed in the publishing.
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: sjsharks on February 14, 2011, 02:42:18 PM
I hope I'm asking this in the right place! :-[

Browsing Amazon.com I noticed a new short story collection (Naked City: Tales of Urban Fantasy) with a story by Jim due out on July 5. Will this be a Dresden Files story? If so, will there be any problem having come out before Ghost Story, spoiler-wise? I'm fairly sure the dude on the cover is supposed to be Harry, but I could be wrong.

The story is called Curses I believe, and it takes place well before Ghost Story on the timeline. It was supposed to come out a while ago but the release was delayed. (and yes, that is Harry on the cover ;D its one of the main reasons I'm actually gonna buy the collection instead of just drinking coffee with it at Barnes and Noble)
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Warden John Marcone on February 14, 2011, 09:12:55 PM
This might have been asked, so sorry if it has.

Quote
Does Nicodemus have any alternate forms other than his shadow?
No, he just has his shadow do things for him.  You go relying on an alternate form to get things done, that still puts you in personal danger and Nicodemus is more practical than that.  He'd rather stand over here and let something else kill and get the work done.  Unless it's something cool like a Knight of the Cross, in that case he's still got something to prove.

What is the something he has to prove?  Why does he feel the need to test himself against the knights personally?
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Dina on February 14, 2011, 10:32:01 PM
The story is called Curses I believe, and it takes place well before Ghost Story on the timeline. It was supposed to come out a while ago but the release was delayed. (and yes, that is Harry on the cover ;D its one of the main reasons I'm actually gonna buy the collection instead of just drinking coffee with it at Barnes and Noble)

Yes, I even think that is chronologically before Changes. So no spoiler-risk.
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: TwentyOne on February 15, 2011, 05:43:55 AM
Great! ;D

It'll be a nice treat while waiting for the new book.
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: stu.climber on February 16, 2011, 04:46:45 AM
Since most books (except changes which clearly is a huge turning point even more so than usual) have a 2 word title i was wondering if there was a cool story, some significance, or just why they happen to be the same length (fool and moon are both 4 letter words, grave peril are both 5, etc.)?

Also dude sweeeeeeeet books man 
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: sjsharks on February 16, 2011, 05:30:44 AM
Since most books (except changes which clearly is a huge turning point even more so than usual) have a 2 word title i was wondering if there was a cool story, some significance, or just why they happen to be the same length (fool and moon are both 4 letter words, grave peril are both 5, etc.)?

Also dude sweeeeeeeet books man 

Audience:  I was just wondering about the titles of the books, how they're all two words and both words are always the same number of letters.  Why did you choose to do that?

Jim Butcher:  Okay.  He's asking about the titles of the books, why are the books always two words, same number of letters.  Answer to that was that I had noticed when I was in college and in my writing courses that all of the really successful, or most of the really successful serial P.I. novels had a naming scheme of some kind attached to them.  MacDonald's books, John MacDonald's books all had a color in the name.  A is Alibi, B is for Burglar, etc. with the Kinsey Millhone books.  It was the same way with several different authors that I looked at.  So, I said, 'I need a naming scheme,' and I was going to use puns because I thought that would be fun.  And so I was trying to get pun stuff set up and they didn't, they didn't like that.  The editors didn't like that at all.  So, the first book, I think the original name was Semiautomagic and then I said, 'Can we call it Abracadaver?' and they said, 'No, we can't.'  And I went through several different names and it finally ended up as Storm Front, which was only kind of vaguely a pun.  But they did it in these nice square little boxes with the title all being lined up.  And so I said, 'Well, hey, the next one was already going to be called Fool Moon, so that one will line up too.'  And so at that point, then I said, 'Okay, the only pattern I'm going to have here is where we line up these little boxes.  So, let's at least keep that.'  Until we got to this book, which is called Changes and totally breaks the pattern...presumably because there's going to be some changes. So...yes, ma'am?
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: wardenferry419 on February 16, 2011, 08:32:39 AM
Alot of the short stories seem like the opposite of the novels. The novels are the epic adventures of Harry; while the short stories are the misadventures of Harry. Fighting a horny, drunk Grendal doesn't really compare to taking down an insane Summer Lady who wants a global do-over. The short stories are the things he mentions between books that either pay the bills and/or get little recognition.
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: HandyGandy on February 22, 2011, 10:46:27 PM
Since harry does explicit power calculations a few times, there must be some unit of "magical energy". What is it called? How is it defined?
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: sjsharks on February 22, 2011, 11:17:53 PM
Since harry does explicit power calculations a few times, there must be some unit of "magical energy". What is it called? How is it defined?

I believe the calculations he does is to see how much of each individual focus he will need to make a spell/potion work. "magical energy" would be life force, the soul, chi, etc. and it depends on how skilled the wizard is. A master could use minimal energy to get something done that it would take a beginner massive amounts of energy to use.
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Snowleopard on February 23, 2011, 02:45:42 AM
Since harry does explicit power calculations a few times, there must be some unit of "magical energy". What is it called? How is it defined?

Why not call it an - Abbra?  As in Abbra Cadabra. ;D
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: knnn on February 23, 2011, 04:32:41 PM
Thaum, as in the "the first law of thaumodynamics".
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Landing on February 23, 2011, 11:44:17 PM
Thaum, as in the "the first law of thaumodynamics".

Terry Pratchett already uses that one, Jim will have to come up with his own.  ;D
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Ladyeshu on March 09, 2011, 06:11:07 PM
I don't know if this question has been asked yet but:

What is up with MAC? Don't get me wrong cause I think he's all sorts of hidden bad assery underneath the layers of two word sentences. I just want to know if you have awesome plans for him. I don't need specifics or spoilers, just a yes or no will do!  ;) thanks!
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: MacShidhe on March 09, 2011, 07:47:17 PM
I don't know if this question has been asked yet but:

What is up with MAC? Don't get me wrong cause I think he's all sorts of hidden bad assery underneath the layers of two word sentences. I just want to know if you have awesome plans for him. I don't need specifics or spoilers, just a yes or no will do!  ;) thanks!

Jim has addressed that recently.  He says we will probably learn about Mac in the BAT.  (I really want to know how he got to be on a first name basis with Morgan :-))
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: wardenferry419 on March 09, 2011, 09:36:24 PM
I think that we will find out Mac is a retired wizard who gave up the magic for normalcy.
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: sjsharks on March 10, 2011, 01:40:48 AM
Could MacAnally possibly be a son of Dionysus?
He's not a Greek god nor a scion of the gods, I'll tell you that much, but we will probably won't get to see much about MacAnally until the big trilogy at the end.
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Dina on March 10, 2011, 02:27:54 AM
Well, he can be a not-greek gpd  ;D
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: MacShidhe on March 10, 2011, 08:48:37 PM
Who takes care of the Archive/Ivy when Kincaid is away on "business"?  Also, she was too young to do anything on her own when she became the Archive.  Who originally hired Kincaid as her protector and did he have to change her diapers?   :D
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: wardenferry419 on March 10, 2011, 09:17:05 PM
That's a weird idea. Kincaid and diaper-changing don't compute. But, then again, Cable (X-men) must have done it for Hope.
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: wildone654 on March 12, 2011, 11:23:41 PM
Who takes care of the Archive/Ivy when Kincaid is away on "business"?  Also, she was too young to do anything on her own when she became the Archive.  Who originally hired Kincaid as her protector and did he have to change her diapers?   :D

Wasn't he working for her mother when she was born? 
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Snowleopard on March 13, 2011, 12:39:01 AM
Wasn't he working for her mother when she was born? 
Kincaid had worked for the grandmother and knew the mother.  When grandmother was killed
I suspect he must have then been working for the mother when Ivy was born and mom killed herself.

Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Alilisa on March 13, 2011, 07:22:54 AM
Changes SPOILER
(click to show/hide)

remember your spoiler tags! --Blaze
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: uncanny on March 14, 2011, 04:22:10 PM
Changes SPOILER
(click to show/hide)

remember your spoiler tags! --Blaze
Welcome to the club Alilisa :).  I think you'd need to read the rest of the series to understand where this fits in.  For Harry, I don't think he had any other option to
(click to show/hide)
(click to show/hide)

Sorry if some of that is a bit cryptic.. I really hope you give the series a chance, and I didn't want to spoil too much for you.
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: knnn on March 15, 2011, 11:34:36 AM
New question:

Will the RPG ever get a cameo in the series?
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: MacShidhe on March 15, 2011, 03:14:12 PM
New question:

Will the RPG ever get a cameo in the series?

That would be awesome  8)
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: knnn on March 15, 2011, 04:18:28 PM
Problem is that I could see it having a major influence on the world --  e.g. I could totally see Billy publishing it without all the censored parts now that [Changes Spoiler]
(click to show/hide)
.   Then the next books have to deal with the fallout.

Alternatively, the first sentence of the Big Apocalyptic Trilogy could be:  "Hells Bells Billy.  You published WHAT???!!!"
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: zandamascus on March 27, 2011, 12:02:28 AM
Jim mentioned once that Mother Summer in SM is the second mother summer in recorded human history. I was wondering if anything significant happened in relation to the change.
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Warden John Marcone on March 28, 2011, 09:28:27 PM
Jim mentioned once that Mother Summer in SM is the second mother summer in recorded human history. I was wondering if anything significant happened in relation to the change.

coughcoughiceagecoughcough
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: the neurovore of Zur-En-Aargh on March 29, 2011, 01:13:07 AM
coughcoughiceagecoughcough

Which ice age ? if we're talking the most recent, that's pretty small potatoes compared to the ones we getter further back in the geological record.  (Basically, the Sun is getting hotter over time, by about 15% since the Cambrian; it's effectively impossible now to have a hard Snowball Earth, as it appears we might have had a few times before the Cambrian.)
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Warden John Marcone on March 29, 2011, 02:15:55 AM
Ooh, there's a question.

Is Mab older than the Dinosaurs?
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Snowleopard on March 29, 2011, 05:10:14 PM
If I were you I wouldn't be asking it anywhere where SHE might hear.
She might be that old but I doubt she'd appreciate being lumped in with a bunch of
overgrown lizards and scaled birds. ::)
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: cass on March 29, 2011, 05:25:15 PM
The last 'true' ice age (ended 20 thousand years ago) was long enough ago that I don't think we had 'recorded' history.  Perhaps some oral remnants remain, but I'm fairly certain humanity was pre-writing at that point, pictographs notwithstanding. Now, the so-called "Little Ice Age" (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Little_Ice_Age) may indicate a sudden spike in Winter's power.  The temperature change was most pronounced in Europe, which is consistent with the (probable) location of most of the Sidhe dealings with mortals at that time.
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: SpoonR on March 30, 2011, 07:05:02 PM
In Grave Peril, Harry crosses into the Nevernever from his apartment living room. It goes to "his apartment, only a bit cleaner and brighter". In Changes, he crosses from his lab (only one room away), and ends up in a garden with a primrose path (I see what you did there ;) ). So, do different parts of Harry's home lead to different parts of the NN, or did the NN 'next to' his apartment change between the two books?

(In the search results, this was only discussed kind of tangentially)

SpoonR
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Contrarius on March 30, 2011, 07:15:45 PM
I started a thread on this not too long ago. Lessee if I can find it....

Ahh, here it is. I dunno that we came up with any firm conclusions, but there's lots of discussion here:

http://www.jimbutcheronline.com/bb/index.php/topic,24871.msg1053519.html
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Snowleopard on March 31, 2011, 02:01:43 AM
In Grave Peril, Harry crosses into the Nevernever from his apartment living room. It goes to "his apartment, only a bit cleaner and brighter". In Changes, he crosses from his lab (only one room away), and ends up in a garden with a primrose path (I see what you did there ;) ). So, do different parts of Harry's home lead to different parts of the NN, or did the NN 'next to' his apartment change between the two books?

(In the search results, this was only discussed kind of tangentially)

SpoonR

I think the CrossOver from his lab is the one that Lea has had guarded to keep UglyNasties from coming in from.  And I don't think he knew of it until he got his mother's gem from Lea.
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Contrarius on March 31, 2011, 03:10:58 AM
I think the CrossOver from his lab is the one that Lea has had guarded to keep UglyNasties from coming in from.  And I don't think he knew of it until he got his mother's gem from Lea.

Yeah, but Leah says she's protected allllll of his apartment, not just the lab. Go back and read that recent thread -- lots of thoughts there.
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Drulinda on April 05, 2011, 12:55:38 AM
heres a question ive had since Changes. if Biancas "Grandmother" was so good with magic why did she have to seek out Mavra?
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: sjsharks on April 05, 2011, 01:50:53 AM
Yeah, but Leah says she's protected allllll of his apartment, not just the lab. Go back and read that recent thread -- lots of thoughts there.

But she doesn't say its all protected the same way, or that it has always been a garden ;)
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: the neurovore of Zur-En-Aargh on April 09, 2011, 03:47:33 AM
Yeah, but Leah says she's protected allllll of his apartment, not just the lab. Go back and read that recent thread -- lots of thoughts there.

Some time does pass between GP and Changes.
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Contrarius on April 09, 2011, 03:48:28 AM
Some time does pass between GP and Changes.

She indicates that she has done that for his entire life....but yes to what sjsharks said. She doesn't say that it has always been a garden.
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Mr. Ghostbuster on April 12, 2011, 03:59:45 AM
How did Micheal become a Knight of the Cross and how/when did he and Harry first meet? Also, I reread Small Favor recently and it left me wondering...Who is/was Mab in debt to?
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Dina on April 12, 2011, 04:00:47 AM
Are you happy with Ghost Story?
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: sjsharks on April 12, 2011, 04:50:41 AM
How did Micheal become a Knight of the Cross and how/when did he and Harry first meet? Also, I reread Small Favor recently and it left me wondering...Who is/was Mab in debt to?

When?
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Annie Wilkes on April 12, 2011, 12:56:58 PM
Ooh, there's a question.

Is Mab older than the Dinosaurs?

LOL, You wanna ask her that to her face?  :D

My question is.... Are we going to get to see Mac kick off? I mean big time kick off? 'cos my impression of Mac so far is that he's lovely but hard as hell, you don't F*** with the barkeep! I'd love to know we're gonna get to see him righteously kicking some ass.
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Mr. Ghostbuster on April 12, 2011, 06:52:52 PM
When?

Mab has a line in Small Favor when she is talking to Harry where she says something akin to "Don't question me. I am Mab and I have paid my debts."
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Magnus on April 12, 2011, 07:02:15 PM
Actually the line is:
"I am Sidhe," she hissed. "I am the Queen of Air and Darkness. I am Mab." Her chin lifted, her eyes wide, and white around the rippling colors of her irises --  utterly insane. "And I repay my debts, mortal. All of them."
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Landing on April 12, 2011, 07:02:25 PM
Mab has a line in Small Favor when she is talking to Harry where she says something akin to "Don't question me. I am Mab and I have paid my debts."

I don't think she means she owes someone a debt in the same way that Harry owes her. I think she means repay my debts the same way someone might say I owe them a good beating. Her 'debt' is to those that have wronged her.
Quote
“There are others yet who will pay for what they have done,” Mab snarled in her own voice. It sounded hideous—not unmelodious, because it was as rich and full and musical as it ever had been. But it was filled with such rage, such fury, such pain and such hate that every vowel clawed at my skin, and every consonant felt like someone taking a staple gun to my ears.

“I am Sidhe,” she hissed. “I am the Queen of Air and Darkness. I am Mab.” Her chin lifted, her eyes wide and white around the rippling colors of her irises—utterly insane. “And I repay my debts, mortal. All of them.”
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Magnus on April 12, 2011, 07:05:29 PM
I don't think she means she owes someone a debt in the same way that Harry owes her. I think she means repay my debts the same way someone might say I owe them a good beating. Her 'debt' is to those that have wronged her.
Yes, that's how I read it too. :)
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Snowleopard on April 13, 2011, 02:16:37 AM
Me three.  Would NOT want to be Thorned Namsiel when she gets her
cold claws on him.  (not sure of spelling - sorry)  She's so gonna make
his life miserable.
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: MacShidhe on April 13, 2011, 01:44:36 PM
Me three.  Would NOT want to be Thorned Namsiel when she gets her
cold claws on him.  (not sure of spelling - sorry)  She's so gonna make
his life miserable.

He's definately going to become Pruned Namsiel...What do you think she'll do with the coin?
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Snowleopard on April 13, 2011, 04:03:33 PM
From the way the Gruff acted they don't much care about the coins.
Of course this is Mab we're talking about so she just might put/give/toss that coin somewhere
where it can cause the maximum confusion to one of her enemies.
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Warden John Marcone on April 14, 2011, 04:51:38 PM
oh...

Can the sidhe be infected with the Denarians?
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Sydna on April 14, 2011, 05:34:53 PM
We don't know, but I doubt it. I don't think the sidhe has individual souls.

oh...

Can the sidhe be infected with the Denarians?
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: MacShidhe on April 14, 2011, 06:03:13 PM
oh...

Can the sidhe be infected with the Denarians?

I doubt it but I can see them working togehter if the Fae's nature didn't conflict with the Denarian.
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: phoenixjustice on April 16, 2011, 05:32:48 PM
We don't know, but I doubt it. I don't think the sidhe has individual souls.


They cannot be corrupted because they do not have souls--Harry already said in Summer Knight that he could look Mab in the eyes and not worry about triggering a Soulgaze because she didn't have a soul.
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: ejchristian86 on April 17, 2011, 01:26:40 AM
Question:

How did Justin know about Harry? His adoption was clearly not a random coincidence.
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Annie Wilkes on April 18, 2011, 12:50:41 PM
I've got an authory question. Did Jim know how long the DF series was going to be when he started? If not did he just put the twists
in when he thought of them or has he known most of the twists & turns that would happen since the start & has been saving them up for the opportune moment & dramatic effect?
I ask 'cos I'm writing a book & have thought of a couple of twists that I'd like to use in a couple of books time. Only trouble is at the moment I've only got 1 book & not sure if my hero will let me tell any more of his story (ie I'm not sure if I'll make it to 3 or more books!).
Should I "shoot my load" now while I know the first instalment is good & have a fast & furious blowout, or should I take my time & lead to a more satisfying climax (ooer)?  :)
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: sjsharks on April 19, 2011, 01:02:18 AM
A friend of mine had this question. Is Jim sponsored by Coke and Burger King? Is he getting a little extra money on the side every time he mentions them, or are they just his personal favorites?
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: ejchristian86 on April 19, 2011, 01:07:51 AM
I've got an authory question. Did Jim know how long the DF series was going to be when he started?

I heard a WoJ where he said he had the overall story mapped out from the beginning, but has let most of the details evolve as the characters grow. He also had some key scenes (or funny scenes he just wanted to use) mapped out.
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Richard_Chilton on April 20, 2011, 01:26:28 AM
Here's a question:
Why didn't Kemmler become a Freehold Lord?

I'm sure that the Red Court (planning their war with the White Council), the White Court (who hate the White Council), and the Order of the Blackened Denarius would have signed off on it - giving Kemmler the protection of the Accords while he worked on his ascension.

I have couple of theories, but I'd really like to hear if Jim has an answer.

The theories?
a) All humans with mystic power are already covered by the Accord and are the domain of the White Council, or
b) Kemmler was too egotistical to think he needed protection (even after he died a couple of times), or
c) it was on his to do list and he never got around it to.

Someone has suggested that Mab wouldn't let him sign, but if she let a bunch of Fallen wearing Human skins (aka the Order of the Blackened Denarius) join then I can't see why she wouldn't let him join.

Richard
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: JinElusion on April 20, 2011, 06:08:58 AM
What an awesome question. Personally, i would go with the egotistical one. Somebody attempting what he was trying to accomplish has to be on that upper level of arrogance for sure.
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Mr. Ghostbuster on April 20, 2011, 10:13:46 PM
I'm re-reading Dead Beat right now and from the way Mab spoke of Kemmler, a lot of the signatory nations of the accords may have viewed him as a potential threat.
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: ragnrok on April 21, 2011, 01:39:07 AM
What would happen if someone walked through an empowered circle without first breaking it with their foot?
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Richard_Chilton on April 21, 2011, 02:36:55 AM
I'm re-reading Dead Beat right now and from the way Mab spoke of Kemmler, a lot of the signatory nations of the accords may have viewed him as a potential threat.

More of a threat than the Order of the Blackened Denarius? Those guys are bound to Fallen Angels and are trying to win the War for the Bad Side - I tend to rank them as nastier than someone trying to ascend.

I'd love to hear someone ask a question like this at the next con that Jim attends.

Richard
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: sjsharks on April 21, 2011, 03:45:51 AM
What would happen if someone walked through an empowered circle without first breaking it with their foot?

I'm pretty sure it just breaks it IIRC. Binder was going to throw a rock across Harry's circle so his demons could eat Harry and Murphy.
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: derrick on April 21, 2011, 03:56:08 AM
I'm pretty sure it just breaks it IIRC. Binder was going to throw a rock across Harry's circle so his demons could eat Harry and Murphy.

Yup.  Intent breaks the circle.  Mortal intent, at least.  If by empowered ragnrok means a (greater) circle like those that held the Loup Garou or the Archive, then it gets fuzzy.
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: ejchristian86 on April 21, 2011, 04:25:34 AM
I'm pretty sure it just breaks it IIRC. Binder was going to throw a rock across Harry's circle so his demons could eat Harry and Murphy.

Correct. Any object that crosses a circle's barrier will break the circle, regardless of whether or not the object smudges the line itself. After all, not all circles are drawn, and Harry often has to make sure that there aren't particles of dust or hair or anything like that lying across the "line" of the metal circle in his basement.
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: ragnrok on April 21, 2011, 04:33:23 PM
I'm pretty sure it just breaks it IIRC. Binder was going to throw a rock across Harry's circle so his demons could eat Harry and Murphy.

Yes, but every time someone is inside a circle they physically break the circle with their foot before stepping through.  Harry even specifically tells Butters to do so in Dead Beat.  It seems kind of pointless to do that if there wasn't some reason not to walk straight into a circle.
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: JinElusion on April 22, 2011, 02:22:04 AM
Maybe it just determines how the energies disperse themselves: harmlessly or violently. Probably not much violence with a little empowered chalk circle, but there still might be some negative feedback if you don't break it the right way.
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: HandyGandy on May 01, 2011, 06:46:01 AM
What kind of keyboard does Jim use for writing?
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Griffyn612 on May 06, 2011, 05:28:23 AM
Personally, I want to know if Jim was getting bored writing TDF over the last few books (prior to Changes).  I can't say specifically what it was, but with Small Favor and Turn Coat, there was just something that seemed like Butcher was going through the motions with some of it.  Almost like he knew what he was going to do in Changes, but had to finish a checklist of plot points before he could advance the story.

I really felt it in certain things, like with Molly's development, then regression, and back and forth; and with the scenes with Molly/Mouse/Luccio/Morgan in Turn Coat; and even from the rumor I heard about the fact that he wanted to name Ghost Story something else, but was more-or-less railroaded back into the Two Word title.  I feel like he wants to shake things up, and if so, then it's his darn series, so let 'em rip!
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Kilroy on May 06, 2011, 08:51:16 AM
and even from the rumor I heard about the fact that he wanted to name Ghost Story something else, but was more-or-less railroaded back into the Two Word title.  I feel like he wants to shake things up, and if so, then it's his darn series, so let 'em rip!

That's what Changes was, thus the title. He was going to call ghost story ‘Dead’, which they did not care for. I think the new title is better myself.
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Griffyn612 on May 06, 2011, 02:04:29 PM
I think the new title is better myself.

I agree that Ghost Story is a better title, but us saying that is like telling Butcher to rename his kid because we don't like his idea.  It's his creative work, and if he wanted to break the trend with 'Changes', and then continue breaking the trend with 'Dead', then I think its a shame.  Although, I also think Storm Front is a better title than Semi-automagic, so it's probably for the best.

I guess I was just saying that the title thing, combined with the mood I read into his writing, seemed to me that he wanted to break free of the norm.  I think with the Codex Alera series not being in first person, and the latest short stories being from other perspectives, he might be itching for something new.  It wouldn't surprise me too much if he keeps the first-person narrative for the 'files', and then ditches to third-person for the trilogy.
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: AcornArmy on May 07, 2011, 02:35:43 AM
Well, to be fair, it kinda sounded like Jim was joking when said he wanted to call it Dead-- although I can definitely see how he could like the idea and want to use it. If I'd picked up a Dresden book with that title, knowing how Changes ended, it would've made me laugh. The change also would've helped drive home the idea that the changes in Changes were permanent, and things weren't going to go back to normal just because that book ended.

I like Ghost Story for a title too, though, so either one works for me.
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: trek on May 17, 2011, 02:09:08 PM
Jim,

Back in January at MarsCon you mentioned that since a couple of the Dresden short stories weren't available to include in Side Jobs, you were considering a second short story anthology.  You asked the folks present for stories people would like to read/questions we'd like to have answered.  I had a thought on this yesterday.

I'd like to see a short story told from Molly's perspective.  It would take place after Changes.  By way of introduction, she'd need to talk a little bit about how she'd had a crush on Harry since she was a young teen and how she was too embarassed to go to him as soon as her magic started to come in and how her crush has evolved into something deeper.  She could also talk about how she felt about
(click to show/hide)
in Turn Coat and
(click to show/hide)
.  I don't know what the major conflict could be, but a discussion with Michael, Charity, and Fr Forthill about
(click to show/hide)
would fit in nicely, don't you think? 
(click to show/hide)

Just an idea, some threads I'd love to see woven together.

Cheers.
-trek
Title: Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
Post by: Alablast on May 21, 2011, 05:48:01 AM
I have a question about the Dresdenverse for Jim- okay, I have a whole boatload of them, but here's the one I'd most like answered.  The White Council uses the term 'mortal wizard', rather than 'human wizard', lots of times to describe it's members and areas of influence (mortal practitioners in White Knight, a few other places).  This doesn't seem too confusing- like the Fae, older wizards probably never get out of the old speech habits, and word things accordingly.  However, this raises my question- what does this mean for animals?  They would certainly qualify as 'moral'.  Outside of the Dresdenverse, there are legends about animals who wield magical powers (Native American legends of the coyote, Japanese legends of kitsune or long-lived cats, etc), and while these could easily be explained in the Dresdenverse as non-mortal creatures (the White Court of vampires seem to have several similarities to kitsune, for instance, and I can't help but think there was some hint towards this with the name Inari, but it's entirely possible I'm just reading too far into a coincidence), we do have in Terra West an example within the Dresden universe of an animal gaining magical abilities.  Terra reminded me of something on the level of the Alphas- she's learned enough magic to do one trick really well- but this would imply the possibility for animals to gain even more power (through whatever means Terra did).

So, finally, my question is, if an animal was able to gain enough magical talent, would it be eligible for entry to the White Council as a wizard?  Would it be subject to the same Laws of Magic, and would those rules carry over to members of it's species as well (would a bear wizard be considered a warlock if it used magic to kill another bear, or would it be allowed to mind twist humans into leaving it alone since they aren't bears)?  I am quite sure you won't come out and tell us if any of the wizards currently in the Council are actually animals- if there are any, I'm sure there's a point to that that will be revealed quite dramatically later, and if there aren't any, well, why ruin an opportunity to keep us guessing- but I am curious as to the possibility of it from the way the terms are worded.

I also can see a certain irony in the possibility of a bat wizard having been involved with the war against the Red Court.

Edit: adding links to newer versions of this for my reference -Serack (http://www.jimbutcheronline.com/bb/index.php?action=profile;u=23736)
WWYAJ (http://www.jimbutcheronline.com/bb/index.php/topic,26525.0.html)