So, according to a reddit comment I found, Jim has apparently said ...
Did this redditor cite his source, or provide an exact quote?Cool.... 8) I hope it is a tall horse, with Harry's long legs we don't want to see his heels dragging on the ground! ::)
Because you can make any claim you want online...
Jim says that in Twelve Months, we will learn that Harry's starborn powers tap into a deep-Nevernever realm called Equestria, and he will summon a steed named Tirek Rainbow Lord to ride into battle, who will trounce Mab's unicorn.
Prove me wrong!
;D
Jim said it during an interview. It's on YouTube the youtuber is Jr Carrel, the video is called Exclusive interview with Jim butcher: unveiling the magic behind the dresden files. It's at the 1:22:34 mark
Jim said it during an interview. It's on YouTube the youtuber is Jr Carrel, the video is called Exclusive interview with Jim butcher: unveiling the magic behind the dresden files. It's at the 1:22:34 markThank you! I figured someone on here would have kept a weather eye out!
Did this redditor cite their source, or provide an exact quote?Cheeky G33k! Although I would point out the onus of proof is on the claimant :P
Because you can make any claim you want online...
Jim says that in Twelve Months, we will learn that Harry's starborn powers tap into a deep-Nevernever realm called Equestria, and he will summon a steed named Tirek Rainbow Lord to ride into battle, who will trounce Mab's unicorn.
Prove me wrong!
;D
Cool.... 8) I hope it is a tall horse, with Harry's long legs we don't want to see his heels dragging on the ground! ::)Knowing his luck (and Jim's humour) Harry would be stuck on a shetland pony.
Thank you! I figured someone on here would have kept a weather eye out!<sigh>
Cheeky G33k! Although I would point out the onus of proof is on the claimant :PIndeed the onus is! I was pointing that out, myself: without a cite (now provided... TYVM @kel0700!) the OP claim was every bit as unproven as my own claim (I... uh... I'll have to go looking for the cite proving that claim! ;D )
Knowing his luck (and Jim's humour) Harry would be stuck on a shetland pony.At that point, he might as well ride Mouse...
So all, what do we think about this new information? Thoughts? Theories?I think we don't have enough info, as yet.
Honestly, I'm inclined to think not: I think being Starborn is an Outsider-specific thing (and possibly a general ability to (eventually) overcome any/all mental domination)... but not a universal/overall powerup (I think all. that. power. is just Harry the Brute). But the Rampires AFAIK never showed any Outsider-ish resistance to other WC wizards' magic (though that whole "Lords of Outer Night" is certainly evocative of some sort of relation to "Outsiders"), so I wouldn't expect the Starborn thing to give them any advantage.
"There was a complex confluence of events, of energies, of circumstances that would have given a child born under them the potential to wield power over Outsiders."
"Listen," Lasciel said, giving my head a little shake. "You have the potential to hold great power over them. You may be able to escape the power now held over you."
Harry's motif in GP was fire, more so BECAUSE of the scene and it's related emotional response I thinkcome to thunk it, that might be why he couldn't do the pocket full of sunshine after that specifically. He closed his aspect of happy light fire when he opened the floodgates of the metaphorical Man on Fire.
Pyro fuego pyro. Can be translated with his intentions to do more. Say, HOT PASSION FIRE.
come to thunk it, that might be why he couldn't do the pocket full of sunshine after that specifically. He closed his aspect of happy light fire when he opened the floodgates of the metaphorical Man on Fire.
Harry states I believe that after Susan was half turned and went away that he was never able to capture sunshine in a hanky again.yoooi seriously, stip repeating exactly whf I just said likewise just didn't day it. Avoid me Mira. Periomd. Not to day
It has more to do with his own emotional state, which though he is more at peace now, the unhappiness remains, than any floodgates he opened.
yoooi seriously, stip repeating exactly whf I just said likewise just didn't day it...
Except she wasn't just "repeating" it.actually that's a Symantec trap pulled before. An considering your alway the co-conspirator.. 👀 you rallying to her defense is less than anything to me.
For one thing, you used a specific jargon term, "aspect" (his aspect of happy light fire) which (depending on who is reading, and how much they know of the "extended canon") might be taken specifically as a reference to game-mechanics from the Dresden Files Roleplaying Game, where "aspects" are a Really Big Deal, and only change at "milestone" events.
For another, she was explicitly disagreeing with you (more to do with his own emotional state... than any floodgates he opened).
Harry states I believe that after Susan was half turned and went away that he was never able to capture sunshine in a hanky again.so, after Susan was changed, an he unleashed his passion and outrage, he couldn't do the hanky? 🤔 most auspiciously what i said...
It has more to do with his own emotional state, which though he is more at peace now, the unhappiness remains, than any floodgates he opened.the emotional state of a man on fire?
So thanks for bringing in the extracurricular evidence to back my theory 🙃 Harry's fire aspect changed because of how he used it. Intentions, even subconscious ones, color the magic used after all. An fire is directly related to sunlight aspect because it's all a flavor of summer as confirmed by hiding his blasting rod.Capturing sunshine in his hanky and then not being able to duplicate the feat had nothing to do with how he used the sunshine.
Maybe ask what a metaphorical man on fire is if you lack understanding of the concept off rip? Like hey, I didn't know that's the metaphor you gathered from Soul of the fire, Braveheart and other examples where the injustice of loss calls even the most broken men to war. Passion eh?
so, after Susan was changed, an he unleashed his passion and outrage, he couldn't do the hanky? 🤔 most auspiciously what i said...
And I never said anything about how he used it, so we're already going off topic here. I addressed why he couldn't.
dn't.How exactly does the ability to capture a beam of sunshine in a hanky turn into a man on fire? ??? Just because you can catch a couple of drops of rain in a glass that doesn't turn you into a water fall.... ::)
Yes, although reddit is a poor choice to back a claim. A 'man on fire' is not implied to be a happy person, no?
Losing someone you love, not by loss but by force of circumstances beyond your control. Yes, his happiness was gone, I haven't denied it. I supplied what replaced it see?
Seriously people... go look up double empathy an see if it's just you who's not grasping how the other communicates.. Because I'm reading just fine.Really? :o ??? :-X
In fact, my ability to read into people is specifically what I bring to the table 👀
If he can no longer capture it, then he doesn't have it... ??? Nor will he have it.. :( So what exactly is the point of saying why he couldn't.. ???to express myself. Which is allowed here. What is the point of this particular comment? To harass? That's specifically not.
How exactly does the ability to capture a beam of sunshine in a hanky turn into a man on fire? ??? Just because you can catch a couple of drops of rain in a glass that doesn't turn you into a water fall.... ::)Quotenow your willfully being ignorant. Here I'll give you exactly what you want right here right now. [Comment removed for rule breaking]-mod team[Comment removed for rule breaking]-mod team. This place needs to come down just as much as the white council does.
Maybe you think you replaced it, but with the loss of Susan Harry's happiness was kaput! You see that's what is behind the ability to catch that old sunbeam.. Happiness is seems is a vital component, like trying to do a tracking spell without... Well, you get the point.. Really? :o ??? :-X
I am going to make this really clear. I and the other mods will not tolerate rule breaking and general antisocial behaviour.your perspective is quite colored. You are not modding here, you are closing ranks and othering those who are not part of your monkey sphere.
We don't have the time or patience for it. I am not going to spend all my time warning people.something that should indeed be done, i fear in your haste you have overlooked some in favor of those you prefer.Quoteyou do not, you do not.Be kind and courteous to each other, read the rules and precepts and Rules of Don't again. I advise everybody to do that just to be clear on everything.
Most people here are very well behaved and I won't have it ruined for them. [/b]there. There is the reveal of your corrupted intentions. You don't care about the quality of the group, that it deserves to exist or not.
The_Sibelis has been banned. Obviously they were unhappy with the admins here, and should feel free to find places where they can feel more comfortable.overall? Good luck with What Follows.
Overall, friends? Read the Precepts. Follow the Precepts. Be civil. Have fun.
~Blaze as Mod.