ParanetOnline

The Dresden Files => DF Spoilers => Topic started by: dspringer1 on July 24, 2017, 08:47:24 PM

Title: Many Questions on Proven Guilty
Post by: dspringer1 on July 24, 2017, 08:47:24 PM
All

I know it has been talked about before, but on many levels Proven Guilty does not make sense.  There seemed no reason for the Fetch to get involved and there are all these mysterious events at Arctus Tor.  Given this story is the prime candidate for the “time travel” experience of Harry, I wanted to poke at it.

Facts
•   “Darby” was booked a year in advance to attend the Con – by his lawyer
•   Madrigal (aka – Darby)’s lawyer/flunky was killed by the Fetch
•   Someone killed a bunch of Mab’s troll guards with Hellfire
•   Lilly and Maeve conspired to lure winter into leaving their borders to allow summer to attack the Red Court
•   Mab allowed Harry to recover Molly
•   A portal exists from the theater to Winter
•   The Fetch took Molly to Arctus Tor
•   Maeve slowed time in Winter so that winter armies would not threaten Summer for sufficient time -- such that Summer could attack the Red Court
•   The Red Court did a major attack on the White Council during the events in Proven Guilty – including targeting Luccio’s boot camp (ie – really important battle)
•   Somebody fixed Little Chicago (although this is more evidence of time travel than something relevant to the questions below)
•   Mab could NOT have sent the fetches to kill people at the con.  She is not allowed to do this due to the rules of Fey Queens.  Either someone else gave the command or the Fetches were killing on their own. 

Reasonably Certain
•   The Fetch killed the lawyer to shut him up because he knew things
•   The fetch knew enough about Molly to trick her into inviting them into the house (not a high threshold, but not complete ignorance)
•   The Fetch attacked the theater owner to keep the theater closed – presumably to allow them to feely use the portal
•   Madrigal was set up for some reason – somebody (- or something ) wanted him at the con
•   Molly did her first Black magic just days (or at most weeks) before the events in Proven Guilty – as she did not discover her friend was pregnant until then.
•   Nik was surprised (and very unhappy) to learn that Denarians were involved in the attack on Arctus Tor
•   The Fetch were involved because of orders from the Queen – but which one is unclear

Decent Guesses
•   Molly’s presence could not have easily been predicted without foreknowledge.  Not assuming foreknowledge as foreknowledge is a boring answer. 
•   The Fetch used the beacon that is Molly’s fear casting to enter the mortal world
•   Harry suggested Madrigal was set up to be the patsy to take the blame.  I would argue that Madrigal was set up to be the beacon.  But since Molly ended up being the beacon, Madrigal was thus unneeded.   
•   Thorned Namshiel was involved in the attack on Arctus Tor
•   Nik is afraid that a fallen is nemfected
•   Maeve might have been nemfected, but not so badly that her actions were highly influenced.
•   The Fetch were there for a reason beyond killing people at a con.  They are both spies and assassins after all.  Neither mission seemed to be relevant to what they did at the con. 


Questions
•   Which queen gave orders to the Fetches – or was the Fetch acting on their own?
•   If Madrigal was set up a year in advance, why.  I cannot have been related to Molly’s use of black magic or the battle with the Red Court as neither could have been reliably predicted a year in advance.    If he was set up from the begining, it had to be for another reason. 
•   Was the portal to winter always in the theater --- or did someone create the portal for this purpose?  The first might suggest a longer term plot while the second might suggest it was created by a Winter queen. 
•   Why did Mab not destroy those who killed her guards?
•   Did slowing time in Winter serve some other (less obvious) purpose?
•   When did Maeve and Lilly learn about the attack on the White Council?   Well in advance or only during the events in Proven Guilty? 
•   What else is going on that might justify time travel? 
Title: Re: Many Questions on Proven Guilty
Post by: robert82a on July 25, 2017, 01:16:57 AM
Been a while since I've reread Proven Guilty. I don't have any answers, but I rember when the fetch slipped on ice (chapter 29) immediately thinking the fetch might have been infected with Nemesis. The thing lived its whole life in winter. Seemed really weird to me couldn't walk on ice.
Title: Re: Many Questions on Proven Guilty
Post by: Snark Knight on July 25, 2017, 03:21:00 AM
•   Mab could NOT have sent the fetches to kill people at the con.  She is not allowed to do this due to the rules of Fey Queens.  Either someone else gave the command or the Fetches were killing on their own.

She can't command specific deaths. But hypothetically, she could command them to visit the mortal world at a particular time and place, and just rely on their naturally predatory nature to get the job done. Though I tend toward Nemesis as a more likely explanation for the fetches behaviour.


•   The fetch knew enough about Molly to trick her into inviting them into the house (not a high threshold, but not complete ignorance)

Actually, no. There's a WOJ that Harry surmised wrong there - Molly didn't invite them in, they just powered through the threshold. Which makes them freaking beastly and/or N-fected.


•   Thorned Namshiel was involved in the attack on Arctus Tor

Not that it argues against Namshiel's presence (nothing says only one attacker used Hellfire), but I would note that Rosanna's absence from SG was also quite conspicuous. Also keep in mind Nic's comment in SmF about being sure one of the two women was "our own Judas".

Personally, my theory is Tessa is the ringleader for 1-3 traitor Denarians, but she's succeeded for the time being in framing Rosanna as far as Nic is concerned.
Title: Re: Many Questions on Proven Guilty
Post by: Zaphodess on July 25, 2017, 07:19:57 AM
A couple of other facts and possibilities:

I personally found PG a lot less confusing once I started to think about Mab's role differently. Harry is assuming she is a puppet-master who always knows exactly how things are going to play out in her favor. If you think of her as being in a corner instead and not knowing everything, her play makes more sense. She had to find out what was going on and who was moving against her.

I also believe that PG was the book where Mab found out that Maeve was Nemfected. She technically betrayed Winter, which she shouldn't have been able to do. Literally.

ETA: The Gatekeeper's note did get Harry on board to help in the fact-finding mission without costing Mab one of the favors.  ;)
Title: Re: Many Questions on Proven Guilty
Post by: wardenferry419 on July 25, 2017, 11:09:08 AM
Mab was using Harry in the WK role since her own WK was useless.
Title: Re: Many Questions on Proven Guilty
Post by: ebliss1 on July 25, 2017, 11:43:24 AM
A couple things stand out for me here.

1. The idea that a lot of foreknowledge was required to set all of this up.
2. The Fetches being somehow able to power through the Threshhold of Michael's house - especially given the Angelic protection that we are shown that exists around the house.
3. The long-term effects of this sequence: Harry's awareness of Nemesis, the sudden sowing of doubt among the Denarians, the beginning of the "Molly for Winter Lady" chain of events.

These things sort of say to me: Uriel. He could easily be using these event to maneuver Harry into position, to set up for him a powerful ally (Molly) where before he had an enemy (Maeve), plus he gets to knock the Denarians off kilter by having them turn on one another in suspicion. We know that Uriel likes to plan for the long term and also likes to see how many dominos he can set up to all fall down at the same time.
Title: Re: Many Questions on Proven Guilty
Post by: Zaphodess on July 25, 2017, 01:59:32 PM
A couple things stand out for me here.

1. The idea that a lot of foreknowledge was required to set all of this up.
2. The Fetches being somehow able to power through the Threshhold of Michael's house - especially given the Angelic protection that we are shown that exists around the house.
3. The long-term effects of this sequence: Harry's awareness of Nemesis, the sudden sowing of doubt among the Denarians, the beginning of the "Molly for Winter Lady" chain of events.

These things sort of say to me: Uriel. He could easily be using these event to maneuver Harry into position, to set up for him a powerful ally (Molly) where before he had an enemy (Maeve), plus he gets to knock the Denarians off kilter by having them turn on one another in suspicion. We know that Uriel likes to plan for the long term and also likes to see how many dominos he can set up to all fall down at the same time.
I like the idea. It would fit, cause he has the foreknowledge but can't really act directly.
Title: Re: Many Questions on Proven Guilty
Post by: apgrey on July 25, 2017, 02:03:44 PM
  There are two things I would like to add here.
  I support Evil Bob as the one who fixed Little Chicago.  I suspect he is able to pass Harry's threshold, and can counter Harry's wards.
  The Angelic bodyguard was a retirement bonus.  It was not there during Proven Guilty.

APG
Title: Re: Many Questions on Proven Guilty
Post by: jonas on July 25, 2017, 02:15:17 PM
Quote
Which queen gave orders to the Fetches – or was the Fetch acting on their own?
•   If Madrigal was set up a year in advance, why.  I cannot have been related to Molly’s use of black magic or the battle with the Red Court as neither could have been reliably predicted a year in advance.    If he was set up from the begining, it had to be for another reason. 
•   Was the portal to winter always in the theater --- or did someone create the portal for this purpose?  The first might suggest a longer term plot while the second might suggest it was created by a Winter queen. 
•   Why did Mab not destroy those who killed her guards?
•   Did slowing time in Winter serve some other (less obvious) purpose?
•   When did Maeve and Lilly learn about the attack on the White Council?   Well in advance or only during the events in Proven Guilty? 
•   What else is going on that might justify time travel?
1 The Winter Mother did it, Eldest fatch says so 'I have served the queen of air and darkness since before human memory.' but before human memory puts things in the realm of oblivion. Only 2 ways to do that is if original was still around in another form, or died. Either way he's talking about the queen possibly before it was ever part mortal.
*fyi the fetches goal is in their name, fetch.
Quote
A fetch is a supernatural double or an apparition of a living person in Irish folklore. It is largely akin to the doppelgänger, and sightings are regarded as omens, usually for impending death.
 
evidently referring to a psychopomp who "fetches" the souls of the dying,

found in two Old English glossaries.[4][5] In both texts, fæcce is glossed for mære, a spirit associated with death and nightmares.

seems to have regarded it as a Latin word, though it is unattested in Latin. Instead, it may be Irish, which could be the origin of the Hiberno-English fetch.[4]

The term "fetch" is sometimes glossed for the Scandinavian fylgja, an animal alter ego in Norse mythology connected to a person's fate, though unlike the Irish concept, the fylgja is almost always female.
They came for Molly and what she'd been doing with magic, they came to balance the scales with Mab's free willed knight in the bullpin.
Notic after he ate her, her 'double' was scarecrow, bringer of fear? this whole book is(also) a joke on Sleepy hallow, Batman, and his villain scarecrow. Darby crane(Ichabod/Jonathon) is set to take the fall for scarecrow, called master of fear but is beaten down by 'batman'/detective Harry Dresden when he has no fear. more stuff so old I can't rememeber. it's a humorous amalgamation.
Title: Re: Many Questions on Proven Guilty
Post by: ebliss1 on July 25, 2017, 04:59:58 PM
Quote
I support Evil Bob as the one who fixed Little Chicago.  I suspect he is able to pass Harry's threshold, and can counter Harry's wards.

True that he could potentially have access to Little Chicago, but WHY would Evil Bob fix it for Harry? This would seem out of character for Evil Bob. Additionally, wouldn't Evil Bob need the free will to decide to take that action? Or are you working on the idea that Evil Bob has a new master/owner and that person wanted Little Chicago fixed?
Title: Re: Many Questions on Proven Guilty
Post by: Snark Knight on July 25, 2017, 05:39:41 PM
These things sort of say to me: Uriel. He could easily be using these event to maneuver Harry into position, to set up for him a powerful ally (Molly) where before he had an enemy (Maeve), plus he gets to knock the Denarians off kilter by having them turn on one another in suspicion. We know that Uriel likes to plan for the long term and also likes to see how many dominos he can set up to all fall down at the same time.

Maneuvering Molly toward the Winter Lady role seems a little dark for Uriel. Using angelic foresight to point her towards choices that would have an unforeseen consequence of getting stuck with a mantle that will override her soul seems little different than Lasciel prompting Harry to attempt suicide. Sure, he didn't slip a thought into her head, but it's at least against the spirit of the rules for the guardian of free will.

Plus, up to now Michael's characterization has had his faith as a constant - probably one of the most steady aspects of the series. I'm not sure shaking that - as finding out Heaven had hazarded his daughter's very soul inevitably would - would really be on the authorial agenda this late in the arc.
Title: Re: Many Questions on Proven Guilty
Post by: dspringer1 on July 25, 2017, 09:44:04 PM
Quote
The idea that a lot of foreknowledge was required to set all of this up.

Quote
Molly was probably set up by Sandra Marling, who organized the con and met her at a shelter where she had to do community work. Sandra suggested to Molly that fear can cure drug addiction. There is room for a long-term plan here
.

Quote
Mab couldn't order Molly being killed, so she had to do something else in order to remove the potential danger a warlock daughter of a Fist of God would pose if she got recruited by the opposition. Hence the abduction. When Harry showed up to rescue Molly, Mab could be reasonably sure that he would take steps to turn Molly into an asset. Win-win.

The ideas above are possible (of course), but someone will have to explain what agenda people had here.  What agenda did Winter Queens have with Molly?   With the Con?  With Sending the Fetch into the mortal world.   Of course you can argue that Molly will be very important 5 years later and thus Molly’s involvement makes everything make sense (sorta not really), but Molly ascension to the Winter Lady is clearly a low probability outcome – and the future is probabilities.  It seems a lot of effort to for very low odds of having a maybe sorta kinda vague impact on a new winter lady.   Molly is related to one of the Knights of the Cross, but that is not Mab's concern even if Mab even knew about this.  And Mab would not help Uriel by killing a bunch of mortals in any case.    So again -- the actions of the Fetch do not make sense given what we know -- and foreknowledge or a plot against Molly (same diff) is a claim that does not seem very strong.   


Quote
I personally found PG a lot less confusing once I started to think about Mab's role differently. Harry is assuming she is a puppet-master who always knows exactly how things are going to play out in her favor. If you think of her as being in a corner instead and not knowing everything, her play makes more sense. She had to find out what was going on and who was moving against her.

This could be  real possibility -  but we just do not know what Mab's operation was trying to accomplish.  I doubt it had anything to do with the Con or Molly.  Ditto with Winter Mother's engagement.   




Quote
The long-term effects of this sequence: Harry's awareness of Nemesis, the sudden sowing of doubt among the Denarians, the beginning of the "Molly for Winter Lady" chain of events

ah - not seeing it.  Nemesis awareness was much later, doubt among Denarians is a good thing.  This story is the first where Molly begins her path as a wizard and that eventually leads to Winter Lady, but I have written already how unlikely (probability wise) that would have been.  Uriel arranging events to help Harry makes total sense -- he need to learn from Molly.  Molly as winter lady had to be a real long shot.  Uriel plays for long shots of course, but there are many many long shots.  You can just as easily argue that Molly could eventually have been the Merlin and had great influence over the white council.  Again - possible at the point of time where Proven Guilty occurred.   It is only later decisions that cut off that path.   



Quote
  I support Evil Bob as the one who fixed Little Chicago.  I suspect he is able to pass Harry's threshold, and can counter Harry's wards.

Have to go with others on this.  Makes no sense.  How would Evil Bob even know about Little Chicago.  Why would Evil Bob help Harry?  How could he do this when good Bob is ALWAYS in the room.      And there is no way he can cross Harry's threshold.  He was never invited and is a spirit.  He is a separate individual from skull Bob. 



Quote
The Winter Mother did it, Eldest fetch says so 'I have served the queen of air and darkness since before human memory.' but before human memory puts things in the realm of oblivion. Only 2 ways to do that is if original was still around in another form, or died. Either way he's talking about the queen possibly before it was ever part mortal.

Good logic - I like it. 





Quote
Not that it argues against Namshiel's presence (nothing says only one attacker used Hellfire), but I would note that Rosanna's absence from SG was also quite conspicuous. Also keep in mind Nic's comment in SmF about being sure one of the two women was "our own Judas".  Personally, my theory is Tessa is the ringleader for 1-3 traitor Denarians, but she's succeeded for the time being in framing Rosanna as far as Nic is concerned.

Quite possible.   Well thought out.    If you are correct, then we should see Tessa start to make her play soon after the events in Skin Game.  If that does not derange her mind and have the nemfection completely take over, not sure what would.   
Title: Re: Many Questions on Proven Guilty
Post by: Zaphodess on July 26, 2017, 09:19:46 AM
The ideas above are possible (of course), but someone will have to explain what agenda people had here.  What agenda did Winter Queens have with Molly?   With the Con?  With Sending the Fetch into the mortal world.   Of course you can argue that Molly will be very important 5 years later and thus Molly’s involvement makes everything make sense (sorta not really), but Molly ascension to the Winter Lady is clearly a low probability outcome – and the future is probabilities.  It seems a lot of effort to for very low odds of having a maybe sorta kinda vague impact on a new winter lady.   Molly is related to one of the Knights of the Cross, but that is not Mab's concern even if Mab even knew about this.  And Mab would not help Uriel by killing a bunch of mortals in any case.    So again -- the actions of the Fetch do not make sense given what we know -- and foreknowledge or a plot against Molly (same diff) is a claim that does not seem very strong.   
I think that Mab didn't know what was going on. Her mission was finding out and reacting. A long con with her all knowing and planning doesn't make sense at all. Which you pointed out in your original post.

Molly was most likely the target of the so-called Black Council. Sandra Marling met her long before PG. She could have recognized her potential as a wizard and that her family connection placed her very well to act against the Knights of the Cross. The Knights are a target the BC acts against, it wasn't a complete coincidence that Michael was there in Grave Peril. Imagine Molly as an undiscovered warlock with her psychomancy fully developed on the side of the BC (Nemfected, maybe with a Coin). There lies the apocalypse.

Mab and the Gatekeeper work more closely together than we knew at the time. I think they had the same information and maybe even decided together to share it with Harry, thus getting him on the playing field. The BC was up to something at that con in Chicago and it involved Black Magic. Nothing specific. Mab didn't know it was Molly at first or she could have done something more directly. Or get the GK to act, he is WC after all. Neither did she have plans to recruit her as a possible Winter Lady at that time. She didn't even know then that she would need one. And dragging her to Arctis Tor might have get her killed or her sanity ripped off her. Mab's first order of business was removing the prize from the hands of the BC, once she determined it was her (or Harry determined for her, he was the one who sent the Fetches right to the source of the black magic). Turning her into an asset instead in the long term by letting Harry take care of her: cherry on the top.

As to who fixed Little Chicago: I think it was the Gatekeeper. It would make sense for him to check on Harry, making sure he wasn't in on it either. He didn't fully trust Harry. His decision to send him the note might have been a test. If he observed him, he could have checked his apartment and lab for signs of suspicious activities. Little Chicago would have been interesting to him from a purely nerdy pov and he might have decided to not let Harry die from a stupid accident before he found out what was up with the young man.
Title: Re: Many Questions on Proven Guilty
Post by: ebliss1 on July 26, 2017, 11:00:05 AM
Quote
As to who fixed Little Chicago: I think it was the Gatekeeper. It would make sense for him to check on Harry, making sure he wasn't in on it either. He didn't fully trust Harry. His decision to send him the note might have been a test. If he observed him, he could have checked his apartment and lab for signs of suspicious activities. Little Chicago would have been interesting to him from a purely nerdy pov and he might have decided to not let Harry die from a stupid accident before he found out what was up with the young man.

This makes the most sense out of all the possible choices. Rashid seems to be the one most inclined to be snooping enough into Harry's life to be aware of LC, and the one with the knowledge and power to get into Harry's lab and fix it.
Title: Re: Many Questions on Proven Guilty
Post by: wardenferry419 on July 26, 2017, 11:10:25 AM
Let's not forget that Mavra took issue with Michael killing her children. So, killing one of Michael's children would seem appropriate. Sandra Marling has possible ties to Mavra due to Red Cross shelter in BR.
Title: Re: Many Questions on Proven Guilty
Post by: dspringer1 on July 26, 2017, 02:35:56 PM
Quote
Molly was most likely the target of the so-called Black Council. Sandra Marling met her long before PG. She could have recognized her potential as a wizard and that her family connection placed her very well to act against the Knights of the Cross. The Knights are a target the BC acts against, it wasn't a complete coincidence that Michael was there in Grave Peril. Imagine Molly as an undiscovered warlock with her psychomancy fully developed on the side of the BC (Nemfected, maybe with a Coin). There lies the apocalypse.

Plausible and well thought out.  Does not feel right to me.   The knights are not about stopping outsiders, although they obviously can.  If you are right, this could be a side plot of the outsiders to distract the knights at the point where they want to finish the council.   Does not explain why the fetches were there though - and without the fetches the plot you described would not work. 





Quote
Mab and the Gatekeeper work more closely together than we knew at the time. I think they had the same information and maybe even decided together to share it with Harry, thus getting him on the playing field. The BC was up to something at that con in Chicago and it involved Black Magic. Nothing specific. Mab didn't know it was Molly at first or she could have done something more directly. Or get the GK to act, he is WC after all. Neither did she have plans to recruit her as a possible Winter Lady at that time. She didn't even know then that she would need one. And dragging her to Arctis Tor might have get her killed or her sanity ripped off her. Mab's first order of business was removing the prize from the hands of the BC, once she determined it was her (or Harry determined for her, he was the one who sent the Fetches right to the source of the black magic). Turning her into an asset instead in the long term by letting Harry take care of her: cherry on the top.

So the gatekeeper created the situation by hinting to Mab she investigate -- and Mab's investigation had the side effect of creating the situation.   Maybe.  But then you have all these high level players getting involved into something that is only important because all these high level players get involved.  It is a somewhat circular argument.

Do not get me wrong.  It may well be that there was some important reason for all these people to get involved, but all I am arguing is that nothing in the book identifies that reason.   All we got now is "important people are involved".










Quote
As to who fixed Little Chicago: I think it was the Gatekeeper. It would make sense for him to check on Harry, making sure he wasn't in on it either. He didn't fully trust Harry. His decision to send him the note might have been a test. If he observed him, he could have checked his apartment and lab for signs of suspicious activities. Little Chicago would have been interesting to him from a purely nerdy pov and he might have decided to not let Harry die from a stupid accident before he found out what was up with the young man.

As good an answer as anyone can provide.  Too little info here for me (at least) to have an informed opinion other than to exclude obvious "not" candidates
Title: Re: Many Questions on Proven Guilty
Post by: Zaphodess on July 26, 2017, 05:13:48 PM
So the gatekeeper created the situation by hinting to Mab she investigate -- and Mab's investigation had the side effect of creating the situation.   Maybe.  But then you have all these high level players getting involved into something that is only important because all these high level players get involved.  It is a somewhat circular argument.
Na, neither of them created the situation. The situation was created by the BC. They reacted to it. That's something else entirely.

Look at where Mab is standing at the beginning of PG: Arctis Tor was attacked. She was able to defend it, but it cost her. She identified some of the attackers, but probably not all of them. But she knew two things: Hellfire was being used (i. e. Denarians) and there might be a traitor in her ranks, because the enemy did get entirely too close. The additional info about Nemfection from Cold Days suggests another fear of her: Nemfection in Summer or Winter.

She doesn't know who exactly is on the enemy team, but she has some leads. Because she isn't stupid, she investigates before acting further. Hence the lockdown between Summer and Winter she imposed. No blind rushing into action when your enemy wants you to rush into action.

WAG: One of her leads shows a completely unrelated instance of random black magic in the vicinity of a situation she is observing anyway.

Completely unrelated isn't something she blindly believes in. That's why she sent the Fetches (spies as well as assassins). To investigate and if the opportunity presented itself, eliminate.

At the end of PG, she has gained knowledge (and gotten rid of some enemy chess pieces like Glau). The objective of the enemy's plot was discovered and their weapon (Molly) turned neutral and quite likely into a future asset: not as future Winter Lady (yet), but as a powerful wizard fighting for her team if she needed it.

Would Mab really care about Molly or Michael (or the White Council)? Of course not. Not personally. But she cares about power plays and the Knights of the Cross (and the WC) are the enemy of her enemy. At least at that moment. And it's also generally a good idea to prevent your enemy from getting what they put a lot of effort into achieving. As a matter of principle.
Title: Re: Many Questions on Proven Guilty
Post by: dspringer1 on July 27, 2017, 03:55:21 PM
I get it now.  You see the attack on Arctus Tor preceding the arrival of the fetch.   Mab sent the fetch to investigate afterwards and the events in the con are just collateral damage.   Could be.

Lets diagram the events to see if this makes sense
* Mab makes it a point of arranging beacons on the mortal world for when she needs to send her spies to that world. 
* Sandra Marling is one of those agents - which is why she organizes horror cons.  Sandra arranged for "darby" to be there just in case she needs a spike in fear, but she realizes Molly is a mage and can perform this function as well. So she gives Molly the idea to use fear when she gets the word a strong beacon is needed. 
*  Then when Arctus Tor is attacked (perhaps to make sure Winter does not interfere in the planned attack on the white council, Mab uses this contingency and sends her fetches through to find out information.
*  Fetches feed by their nature -- an unavoidable consequence of sending powerful fetches into a horror con.  Mab obviously did not prohibit this behavior -- and not clear she could (under winter law) force a creature act outside its nature with strong cause
* Fetches realize this path is going to be plugged and take Molly back home with them as a psychic snack.   
* Maybe  a little nudge here or there from Uriel or gatekeeper to make sure Molly is involved and taken to Arctus Tor. 

Is this correct?


If yes, questions
*  Why did Mab not destroy the attackers.  She is VERY  powerful and could certainly call in as many winter allies as needed.  No way a few Denarians and wizards could challenge her at Arctus Tor and survive.
*  Why wait days without a response at Arctus Tor while the events proceeded at Earth.   Yes she is collecting info, but why not summon new/stronger guards
*  Why the erratic behavior of Mab overall in this space.  Not her anger - her behavior that looks like madness




Title: Re: Many Questions on Proven Guilty
Post by: Rasins on July 27, 2017, 07:43:06 PM
I have to say that I'm still unconvinced that Thorned Namsial is the one who was throwing around hell-fire at AT.
Title: Re: Many Questions on Proven Guilty
Post by: jonas on July 27, 2017, 10:01:35 PM
I have to say that I'm still unconvinced that Thorned Namsial is the one who was throwing around hell-fire at AT.
Very unconvinced here too.
Title: Re: Many Questions on Proven Guilty
Post by: Zaphodess on July 28, 2017, 08:33:21 AM
I get it now.  You see the attack on Arctus Tor preceding the arrival of the fetch.   Mab sent the fetch to investigate afterwards and the events in the con are just collateral damage.   Could be.

Lets diagram the events to see if this makes sense
* Mab makes it a point of arranging beacons on the mortal world for when she needs to send her spies to that world. 
* Sandra Marling is one of those agents - which is why she organizes horror cons.  Sandra arranged for "darby" to be there just in case she needs a spike in fear, but she realizes Molly is a mage and can perform this function as well. So she gives Molly the idea to use fear when she gets the word a strong beacon is needed. 
*  Then when Arctus Tor is attacked (perhaps to make sure Winter does not interfere in the planned attack on the white council, Mab uses this contingency and sends her fetches through to find out information.
*  Fetches feed by their nature -- an unavoidable consequence of sending powerful fetches into a horror con.  Mab obviously did not prohibit this behavior -- and not clear she could (under winter law) force a creature act outside its nature with strong cause
* Fetches realize this path is going to be plugged and take Molly back home with them as a psychic snack.   
* Maybe  a little nudge here or there from Uriel or gatekeeper to make sure Molly is involved and taken to Arctus Tor. 

Is this correct?


If yes, questions
*  Why did Mab not destroy the attackers.  She is VERY  powerful and could certainly call in as many winter allies as needed.  No way a few Denarians and wizards could challenge her at Arctus Tor and survive.
*  Why wait days without a response at Arctus Tor while the events proceeded at Earth.   Yes she is collecting info, but why not summon new/stronger guards
*  Why the erratic behavior of Mab overall in this space.  Not her anger - her behavior that looks like madness

Not quite the way I see it. You're assuming Mab is behind Molly's problems. And behind Sandra Marling. I'm assuming her enemies are, the BC. The cluebats in the book are
They establish the teams. Mab is working against whoever tried to use Molly as a weapon (against the Knights among other things). The GK too. They are helping Harry or rather using him. Molly is ideally placed to cause a lot of damage if she became full warlock on the BC side. Even if the WC caught her and executed her, it would be useful. Imagine Michael's reaction if he found out they beheaded Molly. There would be dead wizards lying in that warehouse, among them maybe the Merlin and Morgan.

The Fetches didn't execute Glau because he was a loose end on their side. That's Harry's assumption then. They killed him as soon as they found out he was BC.

Mab didn't wait to get Molly out of their reach. She did it as soon as she found out.
Title: Re: Many Questions on Proven Guilty
Post by: knnn on July 28, 2017, 02:47:26 PM
It's getting a little dated now (over 6 years old, and before we ever heard about Nemesis), but worth a read:

http://www.jimbutcheronline.com/bb/index.php/topic,26853.0.html

Elegast wrote an update post-Nemesis here:

http://www.jimbutcheronline.com/bb/index.php/topic,35451.0.html

Title: Re: Many Questions on Proven Guilty
Post by: Zaphodess on July 28, 2017, 06:31:45 PM
It's getting a little dated now (over 6 years old, and before we ever heard about Nemesis), but worth a read:

http://www.jimbutcheronline.com/bb/index.php/topic,26853.0.html

Elegast wrote an update post-Nemesis here:

http://www.jimbutcheronline.com/bb/index.php/topic,35451.0.html
Oldies but goodies, in other words classics.  :)
These threads got me into thinking more about Molly's potential as the center-piece of the action in PG.

For example, why did Maeve help in the rescuing mission when she was Nemfected at the time? Imo, that's where Harry is spot-on when he said to Eb at the end that they'd tried to use Mab and Mab had turned the tables on them. Molly was supposed to be a promising chess-piece for the BC. They protected her from being found by the Fetches (the black murk, Sandra Marling getting her off the scene by getting Harry to confront the police holding her there). But Mab found her (with Harry's help). She was lost to the BC at that point. Best use would be to make her death relevant. So they helped with the rescue, hoping that they'd saw some conflict between the WC, Winter, the KotC, whatever played out best in the spur of the moment really. And preferably with some key players dead in the end. But Mab gambled and trusted in Harry's ability to see Molly through without a further escalation. And it paid off.
Title: Re: Many Questions on Proven Guilty
Post by: jonas on July 28, 2017, 06:38:14 PM
Quote
Mab didn't wait to get Molly out of their reach. She did it as soon as she found out.
What the fetches? they were always there to fetch her for a queen of winter.
*rereading, I realized that was your intent. Good point on Glau though.
Title: Re: Many Questions on Proven Guilty
Post by: Rasins on August 02, 2017, 02:51:51 PM
What the fetches? they were always there to fetch her for a queen of winter.
*rereading, I realized that was your intent. Good point on Glau though.

Jonas - I don't think so.  I don't know that Mab knew yet what Molly's purpose was going to be, let alone a queen.  But we do know that Mab eventually thought that Molly would be a better fit in Summer.
Title: Re: Many Questions on Proven Guilty
Post by: jonas on August 02, 2017, 11:58:43 PM
Jonas - I don't think so.  I don't know that Mab knew yet what Molly's purpose was going to be, let alone a queen.  But we do know that Mab eventually thought that Molly would be a better fit in Summer.
Depends on why you think she ended up in AT really? But if Lea is dropping cluebats all over the place about wanting Molly, one thinks her boss might know why if nothing else. Purely from that, Mab wanted potential candidates for both summer and winter to be groomed. She just assumed wrongly. And i'd point out as she 'thought' her daughter would be best suited to replace her other daughter,probably came from a more personal and emotional reaction than logical reasoning. The Molly starborn theory would explain any interest directly but,

Alternatively, using what I call the Magicians Info Dump(which is just a reference to the fact it's a misdirection, he'll talk about one bit of magic and it will actually explain pieces of another form or connection elsewhere) DB proves if one is taken out of commission or intentionally withheld from your duty a proxy can/must be sent.
There were two potential proxies in PG. Mab withheld the WK from his duty, if a legitimate duty arose she would have had to send a proxy or providing dereliction of duty allowed the originator of WQ to act in the imbalance, MW. We know it's precisely in an imbalance they can act. So perhaps Mab had little to do with it herself at first.
But then they returned to AT with her, why? Well, when we get there Mab's unknowingly hidden on ice. But if she had at some point completed her icy tomb to help exercise N from lea, and prevent influence in herself, She needed a proxy queen she could trust at worst or a Lady sub at best. Either way someone had to shoulder the proverbial world while atlas stepped away so... I believe Molly has already been Winter Queen.
Title: Re: Many Questions on Proven Guilty
Post by: Rasins on August 03, 2017, 02:09:27 PM
Jonas,

Are you saying that when Molly was take to AT in DB, she was forced into playing the part of a queen?  Like a foreshadowing of her taking on the Lady's reigns?
Title: Re: Many Questions on Proven Guilty
Post by: jonas on August 03, 2017, 11:26:37 PM
Jonas,

Are you saying that when Molly was take to AT in DB, she was forced into playing the part of a queen?  Like a foreshadowing of her taking on the Lady's reigns?
Entirely possible, if you mean PG, not DB ;)
I try to keep idea's pared down to one topic/theory at a time, but a lot of my theories start to interconnect and be dependent on one another. I find it becomes more palatable that way. Here is one that backs it though, i'll try to point out assumptions made from other idea's.

The BC connections/hidden baddie basically gives Molly the idea to use magic to cause fear. Using the forces of creation to do so. The direct result from the 'good guys' side is to kidnap and feed upon said person, intentions be damned that's what they did. They ate pieces of her life force, digging into her soul a bit like happened to her brother.
Directly after that we get the knowing look from Scarecrow(Which iirc the Loup gives Harry too? Idk, somebody shares that look/description) followed by a speech saying more or less he's from beyond human memory... He should be in oblivion!?
*I love the whole batman, sleepy hallow thing going on in PG btw

So fast forward to some future events, Lea is training Molly how to use fear as a weapon without violating Council Laws, using grey area's that don't take away choice. Later on an outsider called Fearbringer in truth is born into the world and Molly ends up WL in the same book.
Those events are directly related, despite what Mab might 'think', Lea was always training Molly into the Winter side. It's all she knows and the 'mirror' that drew in the WL mantle. Something explained in a 'slight of hand' in PG on how spirits find beacons in the mortal world to come through. This is how the Ladies mantles find hosts and how N and company find things to influence.

Tangent:N gets influence into mortals but mortals change so it's not such a threat, but Wizards can also birth things into their thoughts, literally becoming more of such a thing by using their magic that way. So if their using magic that doesn't align with reality, that makes them more of a mirror for an outside presence then a slow possession takes grip. Where in the end it's not so much they took control, as they became them in truth. Hence Warlocks are born, and Wardens who trap outsiders get repurposed with killing deranged magic users. They're one and the same thing. They just didn't get born with all their horrible power at start (this is also why I say Naagloshi and those who walk the path of a Naagloshi are the same thing).

Now, where was I... Ok, so Molly was a beacon for fearbringer but the Fetches ate the Nfection out of her, this is why fearbringers functionality is based on the scarecrows body type. He's an amalgamation of all the fear Mollys identity/soul caused. He gets a cloth shroud because Molly's been leaving Harry's death shroud, that which he was last seen wearing before death, at the scenes of her fear inspiring deaths. SHE'S molding how fearbringer is shaped.
She's the new version of whom made the Mantle of Mab, the starborn of THAT star. Which is not a common idea behind starborn, I know) But what if these millions of starborn are just incarnations of specific stars and the reason why none of them do as much as Dresden is the same reason Mortals aren't as susceptible to N, they don't have the power to birth much of their original mold, for lack of a better word, into the world. Instead of all these mantles being simply broken down graces, they are fragmented portions of the same cosmic identity. Leading to characters/ immortal incarnations with very similar stories and abilities. GK domain is moon, stars farther, outside. All the Greco-Roman gods were planets in our system, so not so much 'star'born as 'celestial body born'?
So Mab's origin is as Fearbringer, Molly's the newest incarnation. That they were trying to use to displace Mab's power and they wanted to become Mab's power(which again, Mab could even thinkMolly's more suited to Summer while knowingly prepping her winter, to show yet another foil)

Oh yea, ok so. When PG was going down Molly was already exhibiting traits of being a Winter Queen. I feel their overall goal was to corrupt not only a potential bearer of WL or Q, but to try to bogart that power like the LoONs did and influence how the WQ power was distributed in reality. That the consciousness the power of the entire courts was separated from on the stone table would again have hold. FB has the same 'power' as Mab but is 'deeper' in a necromantic sense. Older.
Mab's precise reasoning depends on the order of events at AT, but I see it close to this. Mab on the other hand may have known she would be the most precise reflection of WQ besides the Lady so had to bind her with the fetches before she could leave, leaving an Nfected mortal WQ or L behind(depends on where the Mauve situation was in linear time, hard to say). Weakened, unconscious, being fed upon, even if N managed to take root there wouldn't be any power to act. So Mab was covering her rear and siphoning off Nfection of a major player in the future of the power behind the Queens.

Leaving off a whole other tangential theory on Who the courts were made from, what they represent in the DF, their previous role in reality, ect. It would take a lot of space and expo. I will say, in SK the color of horse that the Lady/Queens were on was the start of that.

Questions?
Title: Re: Many Questions on Proven Guilty
Post by: Kindler on August 10, 2017, 03:23:12 PM
In my opinion, I think that, if anyone has foreknowledge into the events of Proven Guilty, it's the Gatekeeper (obviously). I think the Gatekeeper clued Harry in to increase the odds that Molly's life would be saved, that she would become his apprentice, and would eventually succeed Maeve. Not that he knew precisely that all of that would happen, more that he sensed she'd be important, and that he saw probabilities, and acted accordingly. I think Bob gave the infodump on foresight for specifically this reason; the Gatekeeper was playing a much longer game, against the Outsiders, and acted with support of the Winter Court, with which he is demonstrably on decent, if not excellent, terms.

Proven Guilty doesn't take place in a vacuum, and I think the events of the previous book really played into things. I think the Gatekeeper saw some of the future possibilities change when Harry didn't die as was fated in Dead Beat, after things quieted down from the Red Court attacks. Harry became a Warden, struck up a good friendship with Ramirez and Luccio, Butters wasn't outright murdered by Grevane (and subsequently learns to deal with his fear a bit, starting his journey to becoming a Knight), the Erlking (who becomes important again in Changes and Cold Days, arguably the two most critically important books to the over-arching storyline) basically high-fives Dresden for resurrecting Sue, Luccio switches bodies, Morgan develops a grudging almost-not-quite-respect for Harry (which matters in Proven Guilty, at the ending trial), Mavra ends up with the Word of Kemmler, Grevane and Corpsetaker die, Cowl fails the Darkhallow, Thomas is disturbed enough by the events of the book to take night classes and start up his hair salon, and, probably most important, Murphy's flower garden gets messed up (sarcasm).

It's even possible that, if Harry had died, Molly might not have started practicing with her magic—her example and stated influence dying an early, undignified death on the street might have turned her off, though that's really, really stretching things.

The point is that all of these major, major events, involving really, really important players in the Grand Scheme only happen because Harry isn't killed in the first hundred pages of Dead Beat, which, if Gard is to be believed, was supposed to happen. There's no way I can see that the Gatekeeper, who seems to have an oddly acute sense of the future, didn't feel some kind of upheaval in possible futures with all of the changes that took place over the course of a day or two.

I think he felt it, and acted as best he could to steer Molly back onto the right track, because he sensed she'd be important, and he saw that she'd just be tried and executed without Harry's involvement.

As for Mab,  Winter has had interest in Molly for years at that point. Aside from her own considerable talents, influence over Molly provides influence over Michael, (or, and this is a serious, insanely wild guess, Amanda, who is my candidate to wield Amoracchius next).

I think that Mab saw an opportunity and took it, sending the Fetches to literally Fetch her, in order to give her incipient Knight a Fairy Tale Quest (during which he learns about the attack on Arctis Tor), and save Molly's life.

I think she suspected that Summer was the infected Court, which is why she wanted to save Molly—she already had Sarissa as a backup for Maeve—and why she was posturing on the Summer border. I think she might have actually been protecting the White Council from Summer, preventing them from joining in with the Reds.

She only knew that Lea was infected at this point. I think she figured out that Maeve was infected from the attack on Arctis Tor, which happened to be right when she had sent her main force away.

Remember, it wasn't Mab that called back Winter's forces, but pouring Summer fire into the Well. I do think that Mab intended that to happen once she realized that Maeve was Infected, but also wanted to see how Summer would react to Winter's sudden withdrawal; if they turned on the White Council, she'd know, and her forces were still close enough to turn around if she needed them to.

'Course, all of this could be just plain ol' bloviating.

I'm not sure whether that was actually Mab encased in ice or just a projection of her, watching things unfold. If it was her, she might have done it as a measure to prevent infection. I still have no idea how Nemesis is spread; the athame is implicated as the vector of transmission, but is it just by touch, prolonged exposure, or what?

As for who fixed Little Chicago, I have no clue. The Gatekeeper would be pretty cool.
Title: Re: Many Questions on Proven Guilty
Post by: Zaphodess on August 11, 2017, 11:01:58 AM
Eb on Rashid's role:
Quote
Likely he knows already. Knew already. Maybe even pointed you in a direction that would show you more. Assuming he wasn't simply using you to poke a hornet's nest and see what flew up.
Title: Re: Many Questions on Proven Guilty
Post by: circe on August 20, 2017, 01:58:52 PM
What we know; 1. Sandra Marling has been working on this horror con for a year.
2. Madrigal, aka Darby Crane, was booked for a year to appear at the horror con. 3. Madrigal is a member of that sub branch of WCV who get off on fear, can't remember their nsmes, 3. The fetches appear and produce all kinds of fear, that had to have been some kind of psychic buffett.

I can't help but think that Sandra was central to all if this, and who was she working for? Madrigal was set up to take the fall, but for what and for who? It had to to have had something to do with the attack on AT.

We know that Madrigal was working for Cowl. Could Sandra be Kumori?

Who could have known a year ago that Molly was going to develop powers?

I feel that Molly was not central to this at all. This was set up for another purpose and she and Harry messed it up in grand style. Someone is really pissed their plans went down the drain. Cowl, maybe.

Of course, now that Molly has developed these powers, it's just perfect that Harry is there to take her on as an apprentice. And, she has definitely attracted the notice of Mab.
Title: Re: Many Questions on Proven Guilty
Post by: Griffyn612 on August 20, 2017, 03:03:45 PM
I have to say that I'm still unconvinced that Thorned Namsial is the one who was throwing around hell-fire at AT.
Mab seemed convinced.
Title: Re: Many Questions on Proven Guilty
Post by: jonas on August 20, 2017, 04:32:04 PM
Mab seemed convinced.
Not by my reckoning, when she get's pissed at Harry right before she leaves it always implied something hugely different.
(click to show/hide)
Doesn't prove anything of course. But inference from Dresden's perspective as to the culprit is just as untenable  evidence.
Title: Re: Many Questions on Proven Guilty
Post by: Griffyn612 on August 20, 2017, 05:01:57 PM
Not by my reckoning, when she get's pissed at Harry right before she leaves it always implied something hugely different.
(click to show/hide)
Doesn't prove anything of course. But inference from Dresden's perspective as to the culprit is just as untenable  evidence.
Quote
   “Why?”I demanded. “Why did you want the Denarians
stopped? Why send the hobs to kill the Archive? Why recruit me
to save the Archive and Marcone in the event that the hobs
failed?”
  Mab paused, turned, casually showing off the gorgeous curves
of her calves, and tilted her head at me. “Nicodemus and his ilk
were clearly in violation of my Accords, and obviously planning
to abuse them to further his ambition. That was reason enough
to see his designs disrupted. And among the Fallen was one
with much to answer for to me, personally, for its attack upon
my home.”
   “The Black Council attack on Arctis Tor,” I said. “One of them
used Hellfire.”
   Mab showed me her snow-white teeth. “The Watchman and I,”
Grimalkin mewled for her, “had a common enemy this day. The
enemy could not be allowed to gain the power represented by
the child Archive.”
   I frowned and thought of the silver hand that had batted the
fallen angel and his master sorceries around as if he’d been a
stuffed practice dummy. “Thorned Namshiel.”
   Mab’s eyes flashed with sudden, cold fury and frost literally
formed over every surface of the chapel, including upon my
own eyelashes.
   “There are others yet who will pay for what they
have done,” Mab snarled in her own voice. It sounded hideous—
not unmelodious, because it was as rich and full and musical
as it ever had been. But it was filled with such rage, such fury,
such pain and such hate that every vowel clawed at my skin,
and every consonant felt like someone taking a staple gun to
my ears.
   “I am Sidhe,”she hissed. “I am the Queen of Air and Darkness. 
I am Mab.” Her chin lifted, her eyes wide and white around the
rippling colors of her irises—utterly insane. “And I repay my
debts, mortal. All of them.”

Her reaction, to me, reads as confirmation that Harry's guess was correct.  Why else would the name of the Fallen cause her rage to ignite?
Title: Re: Many Questions on Proven Guilty
Post by: jonas on August 20, 2017, 07:22:46 PM
Her reaction, to me, reads as confirmation that Harry's guess was correct.  Why else would the name of the Fallen cause her rage to ignite?
Erroneous answer? The next part is Harry realizing he had offered the very same retribution by going there. The only clue we have as to the purpose of the AT attack comes from nic muttering about a 'survival instinct' to which I assume he meant N and it wanting out of it's entrapment with Lea... Mmm so, are the things that Mab has frozen over actually all fragments of N kept under ice?
Anyway, it's more an idea of what reaction did attacking AT evoke from a timeline perspective coupled with the fact she moves from a convo to indirect topic of "others yet to pay". Granted... she Sidhe, so indirect is her bag, but it went from Harry's singular to Mab's plural pretty fast. She said more in that distinction than otherwise would have been said replying directly to Harry's assertion on a singular individual/duo. Which I don' count the now dead Host as in need of repayment. Harry cleared that debt presumably acting in her name :)
Title: Re: Many Questions on Proven Guilty
Post by: Griffyn612 on August 20, 2017, 08:11:28 PM
Erroneous answer? The next part is Harry realizing he had offered the very same retribution by going there. The only clue we have as to the purpose of the AT attack comes from nic muttering about a 'survival instinct' to which I assume he meant N and it wanting out of it's entrapment with Lea... Mmm so, are the things that Mab has frozen over actually all fragments of N kept under ice?
Anyway, it's more an idea of what reaction did attacking AT evoke from a timeline perspective coupled with the fact she moves from a convo to indirect topic of "others yet to pay". Granted... she Sidhe, so indirect is her bag, but it went from Harry's singular to Mab's plural pretty fast. She said more in that distinction than otherwise would have been said replying directly to Harry's assertion on a singular individual/duo. Which I don' count the now dead Host as in need of repayment. Harry cleared that debt presumably acting in her name :)
I think there's a good chance Mab has Namshiel's coin on ice now.
Title: Re: Many Questions on Proven Guilty
Post by: jonas on August 20, 2017, 09:07:56 PM
I think there's a good chance Mab has Namshiel's coin on ice now.
I'm hoping she's not that stupid. What happens when an immortal whom isn't supposed to violate free will entraps a being whos job it is is to actively manipulate said free will? idk man, but Him and especially Lasciel Make me think if they can't be heard one way their allowed to let their presence be felt in another. We keep getting from the various sources how the fallen in the coins are supposed to be out and influencing (always manage to find that church patsy to recirculate them, unless it's always been the same guy...). What happens when that perfect balance of 30 vs 3 is disturbed? Rebalance. Hell.. i'm not so sure that's not why Fearbringer found a bit of a foothold.
Not direct topic but related, I always viewed both the fact Michael took on Outsiders in PG and Murphy saying The sword would be vulnerable in CD right before a walker shows, to mean Angels and outsiders both play in the same 'absolute'  field of play. So one can hurt the other AND vice versa.
Title: Re: Many Questions on Proven Guilty
Post by: Paviel on August 20, 2017, 10:28:10 PM
Quote
Of course, now that Molly has developed these powers, it's just perfect that Harry is there to take her on as an apprentice. And, she has definitely attracted the notice of Mab.

Molly has had the notice of Leanansidhe since Grave Peril, and probably since long before. I'm not sure how well Leanansidhe's plans meshed with Mab's at the time, but they are both of the Winter Court.
Title: Re: Many Questions on Proven Guilty
Post by: KurtinStGeorge on August 21, 2017, 04:21:09 AM

Facts

•   Lilly and Maeve conspired to lure winter into leaving their borders to allow summer to attack the Red Court
•   Maeve slowed time in Winter so that winter armies would not threaten Summer for sufficient time -- such that Summer could attack the Red Court

•   The Red Court did a major attack on the White Council during the events in Proven Guilty – including targeting Luccio’s boot camp (ie – really important battle)

You left one fact out:

Why did Mab do that?  Did she make a deal not to attack the Reds?  She also prevented Summer from attacking the Red Court.  Was Mab forced to do this or was she playing some kind of long game, or was it both?  Perhaps Mab was prevented from attacking the Reds per agreement so she set up a conditions so the Red Court would eventually be attacked by Summer, but at a time of her choosing.  Mab keeps her deal and prevents Summer from attacking prematurely.   

About Maeve and Lily.  Maeve was working to gain Lily's trust so she could eventually set up the destruction of both Summer and Winter.  This is fairly well established by events in Cold Days.  I've been thinking about this a lot.  Perhaps Maeve's plan worked better than she hoped it would.  I'm thinking that Maeve didn't expect Harry to survive his encounter with Eldest Fetch at Arctis Tor.  Remember Harry only triumphed because Lily gave Harry access to Summer Fire.  She didn't tell Fix she did so, remember his surprise when Harry described events at Mab's stronghold.  There is no reason to believe Lily would have shared her plan with Maeve, but even if she did, Maeve didn't think very highly of Lily, she may have thought the plan wasn't likely to succeed.  Maeve would have still gained Lily's trust and rid herself of the annoying wizard at the same time.  Instead Maeve was forced to carry out the plan to it's final conclusion.  If she hadn't slowed time at Arctis Tor any hope Maeve had of subverting Lily would have gone out the window.   

My final point is about the attack on Luccio's boot camp.  We have no indication it was carried out by the Red Court.  This could have been a Black Council operation done for motives all its own.  My bet is that Cowl was behind it.   
Title: Re: Many Questions on Proven Guilty
Post by: jonas on August 21, 2017, 04:24:17 AM
I think there's a good chance Mab has Namshiel's coin on ice now.
Quote
I'm hoping she's not that stupid.
...Dammit Mab. She's been known to do that for the right reasons despite potential consequences, when she hung Slate up to cool off.
Title: Re: Many Questions on Proven Guilty
Post by: KurtinStGeorge on August 21, 2017, 10:00:55 PM
...Dammit Mab. She's been known to do that for the right reasons despite potential consequences, when she hung Slate up to cool off.

If Mab has the coin my guess is that she can't hold it forever.  It would be like a football team deciding to play in a basketball league or put it this way, Mab is out of her jurisdiction if she thinks she can hold the coin forever.  She has a score to settle with Thorned Namshiel and any other Denarians who worked with him to attack Arctis Tor, but I'd bet she's limited in what she can extract as retribution.   
Title: Re: Many Questions on Proven Guilty
Post by: Arjan on August 21, 2017, 10:46:46 PM
If Mab has the coin my guess is that she can't hold it forever.  It would be like a football team deciding to play in a basketball league or put it this way, Mab is out of her jurisdiction if she thinks she can hold the coin forever.  She has a score to settle with Thorned Namshiel and any other Denarians who worked with him to attack Arctis Tor, but I'd bet she's limited in what she can extract as retribution.   
She will keep the coin longer and safer than the church would have done.

And Thorned Namshiel is the fallen and not a host. Mab has a score to settle with a fallen and she will collect. Thorned Namshiel was out his jurisdiction as well, there is probably a lot she can do.

Title: Re: Many Questions on Proven Guilty
Post by: lt_murgen on September 06, 2017, 06:50:15 PM
I have a running theory that "Mirror Mirror" is going to be a return to the events of Proven Guilty, where mirror Harry and normal Harry are manipulating things behind the scenes to keep or change the timeline.

Title: Re: Many Questions on Proven Guilty
Post by: jonas on September 06, 2017, 07:04:19 PM
I have a running theory that "Mirror Mirror" is going to be a return to the events of Proven Guilty, where mirror Harry and normal Harry are manipulating things behind the scenes to keep or change the timeline.
MM is gonna be a cross between
(click to show/hide)
:)