ParanetOnline

McAnally's (The Community Pub) => Author Craft => Topic started by: Erlking on May 30, 2007, 07:15:37 PM

Title: First person fantasy. Can it work?
Post by: Erlking on May 30, 2007, 07:15:37 PM
My first post woo!

Anyway, I was never into english class and all the writing details and terms so just to make sure Dresden Files is first person right?
I've read lots of fantasy and thats what I enjoy. After seeing the show i picked up the books and its the first books i've read in that view and wondered would fantasy work like that. I mean fantasy like Eddings, Tolkien, Feist type settings because we all know stuff in Dresden Files is real so not fantasy  ;D

So does anyone know that sort of fantasy written in first person and did it read well?
I've been toying with a book idea for a long time but just couldn't get started but that first person really seems 'easy' to me compared to third person.
Title: Re: First person fantasy. Can it work?
Post by: the neurovore of Zur-En-Aargh on May 30, 2007, 08:51:46 PM
So does anyone know that sort of fantasy written in first person and did it read well?

You're making me wince by mentioning drek like Eddings in the same context as Tolkien, you know.

That said, gigantic epic save the world form evil in first person; no. Fantasy world with magic and dragons and so on in first, yes, definitely.  Steven Brust's Vlad Taltos books, starting with Jhereg, which I think is now most readily available in a collection with the next two called The Book of Jhereg, is an excellent example.

Quote
I've been toying with a book idea for a long time but just couldn't get started but that first person really seems 'easy' to me compared to third person.

It looks that way until the first time your reader absolutely has to know something your narrator doesn't know, can't know, or would never, never, never stop to explain.
Title: Re: First person fantasy. Can it work?
Post by: Erlking on May 30, 2007, 08:58:50 PM
You're making me wince by mentioning drek like Eddings in the same context as Tolkien, you know.

Heh, I didn't mean style or skill, just the medieval type settings. Forgive me!  ;D
Title: Re: First person fantasy. Can it work?
Post by: Spectacular Sameth on May 30, 2007, 11:21:29 PM
Dresden Files IS as much Fantasy as everything else like that. The setting has nothing to do with the genre you classify it in. DF is classified as Urban Fantasy because Fantasy breaks down into Urban Fantasy (such as The Dresden Files, Harry Potter, or such other things because they take place in OUR world) and several other different subgenres (and DF might actually fit into a couple of the others...) The term you're looking for is High Fantasy.


Is there a work of High Fantasy that works in the first person?

And my answer to that question is *shrugs.*
Title: Re: First person fantasy. Can it work?
Post by: meg_evonne on May 30, 2007, 11:33:11 PM
Absolutely.  I did some research on point of view with a recent class.  First person is supposed to be the easiest and I certainly found it fun once I got used to HAVING to stay in the same room with the main character all the time.  Writing in the other points of view is much more tricky and difficult apparently and I wanted to do something I wouldn't get embarrassed putting out there to be read.

Anyway, I attacked the local library and drug out all of my favorites over the years.  They were all but one in FIRST PERSON,  I was shocked!  I guess we are so keyed into media that jumps all over the place that our minds tend to write that way.  After the third week of class and reading other students comments--"I got lost, did you switch characters?"  That I just stuck to the one point of view and things really smoothed out after that.

It was tricky trying to remember that you can't say what another character is thinking.  Instead you have to SHOW it so readers can see what they were thinking.  A rather fun puzzle and improved the total output of the piece. 

Best wishes!  Visit your own library and take a peek at what POV they were using.

Meg in IA
Title: Re: First person fantasy. Can it work?
Post by: Beamer on May 31, 2007, 04:16:12 AM
You're making me wince by mentioning drek like Eddings in the same context as Tolkien, you know.
Could you please explain why you consider Eddings drek?

Beamer
Fight for your opinions, but do not believe that they contain the whole truth, or the only truth.
Charles A. Dana
Title: Re: First person fantasy. Can it work?
Post by: Cyclone Jack on May 31, 2007, 08:19:42 AM

Zelazny's The Chronichles Of Amber are in first person. I doubt you can find a more epic fantasy. 'Epic' is as much a function of atmosphere and style as location and event.
Title: Re: First person fantasy. Can it work?
Post by: the neurovore of Zur-En-Aargh on May 31, 2007, 03:23:33 PM
Zelazny's The Chronichles Of Amber are in first person. I doubt you can find a more epic fantasy. 'Epic' is as much a function of atmosphere and style as location and event.

I didn't mention those, because so far as I am concerned, the first two read well, and then they slowly get less and less good.  Zelazny freely admitted that he only kept writing them to put his kids through college.
Title: Re: First person fantasy. Can it work?
Post by: the neurovore of Zur-En-Aargh on May 31, 2007, 03:27:11 PM
Could you please explain why you consider Eddings drek?

Bearing in mind I haven't read one for ages, because of how negatively they struck me when first I found them, let's see... lack of originality, paper-thin characterisation, irritating banter, predictable plots - almost at the level of "take a close look at the map, you know they're going to have to visit every damned country in it", moral obnoxiousness on the "casual mass slaughter is OK if the heroes do it" front, and, on a word-by-word level, the writing is banal.
Title: Re: First person fantasy. Can it work?
Post by: CrazyGerbilLady on June 01, 2007, 02:22:08 AM
Personally I love the Belgariad and the Mallorean.  Love the characters.  Couldn't get into their latest series though .. THOSE characters I just couldn't bring myself to give a hoot about.  Different strokes for different folks I guess.
Title: Re: First person fantasy. Can it work?
Post by: Jacen on June 02, 2007, 10:19:13 PM
I enjoyed the Belgeriad and Malloreon precisely because they weren't deep, philosophical treatises. Yeah, they're pretty shallow but they're fun. As for the Taltos novels, I highly recommend them. Probably one of the coolest things I've ever read. I can't wait to get my hands on the sorta prequel books. And I hope the rest of the series comes out soon. He's got a lot more books planned though.
Title: Re: First person fantasy. Can it work?
Post by: Dom on June 14, 2007, 07:24:25 PM
Robin Hobb's Assassin books are written in first person, and are high/epic fantasy set in a medieval-type world.  You may want to check them out. :)
Title: Re: First person fantasy. Can it work?
Post by: prophet224 on August 21, 2007, 04:35:29 PM
I'd just like to throw out there that ANYTHING can work.  It's a matter of whether it truly fits the work that you are trying to create.  Sometimes it doesn't do it, sometimes it does. 

FPV is often considered the 'first resort' of aspiring writers.  I'm not saying that stories don't work out well that way, but it takes a certain feel and plot for it to be right. 

Also, here's a series; while not 'High Fantasy', I hesitate to call these horror, so I would say they are fantasy:  The Vampire Chronicles by Anne Rice.  You will find many of these written from a first person viewpoint, and honestly, they wouldn't have worked as well otherwise. 
Title: Re: First person fantasy. Can it work?
Post by: Mickey Finn on August 22, 2007, 03:13:51 PM
This fits in nicely with how Alera came about...because Jim believed a good story could be written by a good author on *anything*. (The bet was to combine lost roman legions with pokeman)

Sir Apropos of Nothing is another great series in first person...closer to The princess Bride in feeling, though. A sarcastic, snarky version, where the hero just wants to be the damn hero in his own story, and not the stupid sidekick or villian in some other villian's story that he keeps winding up being. Great stuff from Peter David.
Although the 3rd book gets depressing as hell.
Title: Re: First person fantasy. Can it work?
Post by: Stuart1512 on September 11, 2007, 04:58:57 PM
Sergei Lukyanenko's Night Watch series is a fine example of First Person fantasy/Sci Fi.
Title: Re: First person fantasy. Can it work?
Post by: Shecky on September 11, 2007, 05:49:43 PM
This fits in nicely with how Alera came about...because Jim believed a good story could be written by a good author on *anything*. (The bet was to combine lost roman legions with pokeman)

PLEASE tell me you're joking.  :o
Title: Re: First person fantasy. Can it work?
Post by: Cathy Clamp on September 11, 2007, 10:55:04 PM
Cie and I write quite a bit of our stuff in first person. I find it really increases both the depth of the character and the reader's investment in the mystery/adventure of the book. When the main character doesn't know what happens behind the closed door, neither does the reader, so finding out is all that more important. The trick is getting the character (and the reader) the information so it's believable. That takes practice.  But most all of the authors I like write in first person, too.
Title: Re: First person fantasy. Can it work?
Post by: AverageGuy on December 03, 2007, 09:16:52 PM
Is there a work of High Fantasy that works in the first person?
Robin Hobb?  I know some people don't like her books, but I think they count as first person High Fantasy.
Title: Re: First person fantasy. Can it work?
Post by: RMatthewWare on December 04, 2007, 10:47:09 PM
The Charles deLint novels I've read were in first person.  I don't know if urban fantasy counts, but it worked for me.  He just changed the POV when necessary, but it was all first person.
Title: Re: First person fantasy. Can it work?
Post by: Lisa™ on December 06, 2007, 02:06:54 PM
PLEASE tell me you're joking.  :o

Seconded.  *Baffled*
Title: Re: First person fantasy. Can it work?
Post by: Shecky on December 06, 2007, 03:45:17 PM
Seconded.  *Baffled*

Since posting that, I've learned that it was, indeed, the case. Someone was asserting that good writing is entirely dependent on a good subject, while Jim was responding that a competent writer could take ANY subject, no matter how inane or silly, and turn it into good writing. The person pooh-poohed Jim's position, and Jim finally said something along the lines of, "FINE. I'll show you. In fact, I'll take TWO bad subjects and make something good from 'em TOGETHER." Those two subjects were chosen, yada yada yada, and now we have book 4 of the Codex.
Title: Re: First person fantasy. Can it work?
Post by: DrygonDM on December 06, 2007, 07:37:27 PM
Another fun series that is FPV is the MYTH series - written by Robert Asprin.
This is a Fantasy/Humor epic series. Puns are around, but not like Piers Anthony or Terry Prachet.

Skeeve was created as the flip-side of all those Conan Stories - where instead of the Barbarian tearing down the (Evil) Mage's Tower of Power,
it is the “Sorcerer's Apprentice” (Disney Pun intended) taking on the World.

Quote
Another Fine Myth. Myth Directions. Myth Conceptions. Hit or Myth. Mything Persons. Little Myth Marker.

Now, Asprin also evolves the series and shows the FP Viewpoints of the other Characters that have interacted with Skeeve over the years.

Skeeve FPV books are still “Myth”-titled, where others are “M.Y.T.H. ”-titled.
Quote
M.Y.T.H. Inc. Link. Myth-Nomers and Impervections. M.Y.T.H. Inc. in Action. Sweet Myth-tery of Life. MYTH-ion Improbable. Something M.Y.T.H. Inc.


Next – the series evolves again – when Robert L. Asprin teams up with Jody Lynn Nye and they create the next books:
Quote
Myth-told Tales. Myth-taken Identity. Myth Alliances. {Skeeve} - New Myth-gotten Gains

(I am not sure, but it seems that there are no differences in Titles between Skeeve and non-Skeeve Adventures)
Title: Re: First person fantasy. Can it work?
Post by: Kathleen Dante on December 09, 2007, 08:38:26 AM
PLEASE tell me you're joking.  :o

Nope, that's the truth. Jim shared that story without going into detail way before the Codex Alera sold.  ;D

Just think about it. Fury = Pokemon. Lost Roman legion = Romanic technology. It's like the Roman legion took a wrong turn, went through a portal, ended up in Witchworld and developed fury handling talents.
Title: Re: First person fantasy. Can it work?
Post by: Shecky on December 09, 2007, 02:02:00 PM
Nope, that's the truth. Jim shared that story without going into detail way before the Codex Alera sold.  ;D

Just think about it. Fury = Pokemon. Lost Roman legion = Romanic technology. It's like the Roman legion took a wrong turn, went through a portal, ended up in Witchworld and developed fury handling talents.

Psst - lookie here:

Since posting that, I've learned that it was, indeed, the case. Someone was asserting that good writing is entirely dependent on a good subject, while Jim was responding that a competent writer could take ANY subject, no matter how inane or silly, and turn it into good writing. The person pooh-poohed Jim's position, and Jim finally said something along the lines of, "FINE. I'll show you. In fact, I'll take TWO bad subjects and make something good from 'em TOGETHER." Those two subjects were chosen, yada yada yada, and now we have book 4 of the Codex.

;)
Title: Re: First person fantasy. Can it work?
Post by: Lisa™ on December 09, 2007, 02:13:09 PM
Psst - lookie here:

;)

Nae being cheeky, Mr Shecky.   :D
Title: Re: First person fantasy. Can it work?
Post by: Shecky on December 09, 2007, 02:14:55 PM
Nae being cheeky, Mr Shecky.   :D

Och aye.  ::)