ParanetOnline

The Dresden Files => DFRPG => Topic started by: blackstaff67 on December 08, 2015, 06:12:11 AM

Title: Sponsors and debt
Post by: blackstaff67 on December 08, 2015, 06:12:11 AM
I was going over Paranet Papers when I realized something: If a PC is actually performing a mission.favor for the Sponsor, does he still accumulate debt drawing upon the Sponsor's powers (avoiding consequences, invoking an Aspect w/o a Fate Point, etc) in the performance of said mission.  It all just seemed rather kinda counter intuitive for me:  "Do this thing for me.  If you draw upon my powers (as stated above), you'll go into debt just as if you were off the clock doing stuff." 

Second question: If a PC accumulates debt, how many allow self-compels towards the Aspect (but without awarding Fate Points) so teh PC can voluntarily pay some of it off?  I kinda see Dresden doing this with Winter's Mantle on him.
Title: Re: Sponsors and debt
Post by: Taran on December 08, 2015, 05:55:28 PM
1.  Yes they still accumulate debt. 

This is how I see it: A carpenter owes you a favour, so you ask him/her to renovate your bathroom.

That is the equivalent of taking a compel to do a mission for your sponsor.

During the renovation, the carpenter uses your tools.  They eat the food out of your fridge and they use your car to go get supplies.  These are all things above and beyond what a contractor would do for a renovation. 

You've hired them for their expertise and they usually use their own resources(tools) and expertise to finish a job.  But, if they ask you to cover their lunches the entire time, they're going to owe you.

2. If you compel a player to do something, and it fits the sponsor, I think it's legal to have the player say "I don't want a fp.  I want it to go towards my debt."

In the same vein, if you allow self-compels, I see no reason why they can't self-compel and, instead of receiving a fp, have that compel pay off debt.
Title: Re: Sponsors and debt
Post by: Lonelylurker on December 08, 2015, 08:23:31 PM

2. If you compel a player to do something, and it fits the sponsor, I think it's legal to have the player say "I don't want a fp.  I want it to go towards my debt."

In the same vein, if you allow self-compels, I see no reason why they can't self-compel and, instead of receiving a fp, have that compel pay off debt.

If you *don't* have any debt right now, but the sponsor has something it wants from you, could it offer 'credit'(i.e. fee use(s) of it's power in the future) as incentive?
Title: Re: Sponsors and debt
Post by: Taran on December 08, 2015, 08:39:55 PM
If you *don't* have any debt right now, but the sponsor has something it wants from you, could it offer 'credit'(i.e. fee use(s) of it's power in the future) as incentive?

I'd just call that a compel on the sponsored aspect.

"Hey, can you do me a favour?  we're buds after all"

Offer Fate point.

Now you have a fate point to invoke your sponsor aspect to do what you'd normally do with sponsored debt.  Or to invoke it to gain some other 'favour'.
Title: Re: Sponsors and debt
Post by: wyvern on December 08, 2015, 08:42:26 PM
^ What Taran said.  (I had a whole post typed out, but got sniped.  Oh well.)
Title: Re: Sponsors and debt
Post by: Lonelylurker on December 08, 2015, 08:50:47 PM
I'd just call that a compel on the sponsored aspect.

"Hey, can you do me a favour?  we're buds after all"

Offer Fate point.

Now you have a fate point to invoke your sponsor aspect to do what you'd normally do with sponsored debt.  Or to invoke it to gain some other 'favour'.

That could also work, but allowing the sponsor to issue compels even when you're 'paid up' seems like a big extra liability. So I was trying to mirror the debt mechanic where resisting costs an FP but doesn't reduce the debt.
Title: Re: Sponsors and debt
Post by: Taran on December 08, 2015, 08:54:38 PM
That could also work, but allowing the sponsor to issue compels even when you're 'paid up' seems like a big extra liability. So I was trying to mirror the debt mechanic where resisting costs an FP but doesn't reduce the debt.

I'm pretty sure that's how it already works.

Sponsor says:  'go do this'  and offers a compel.  If you accept, you get a fp.

During the quest, you can spend fp's or go into debt. 

If  you go into debt then, the next time the sponsor says "Hey, go do this"  You can accept (and gain no FP but pay off a point of debt) or say "no thanks" and pay off the compel with a FP.  If you pay it off, you still owe a point of debt since you didn't actually pay the sponsor back yet.
Title: Re: Sponsors and debt
Post by: Lonelylurker on December 08, 2015, 09:02:59 PM
According to YS:287 it looks like that's only true while you have an aspect or consequence in on you effect as a result of using the sponsors magic.
Title: Re: Sponsors and debt
Post by: Taran on December 08, 2015, 09:16:27 PM
No, that's something different.

Let's say I have a High Concept of "Hell's Hand on Earth"  (I'm thinking of the Evil Realm of Hell filled with devils...just as a general example)

So, you are going to get compels based on that aspect.  Doing missions, forwarding Hell's goals, acting in a way that makes Hell happy.  But you have free will, so you can accept or turn those down.

When you take debt, you will continue to get those kinds of compels, but you won't get any FP's for them.

When you take a consequence based on your sponsor: like a mental consequence from casting, the flavour of that consequence has to reflect the sponsors influence on you.  This is separate from debt.  You can still gain a FP from these compels but the colour of the compel might be to push you more towards turning you.  It just gives additional leverage for your sponsor by giving more aspects to compel and allowing them to compel more specific actions.

So just because you are Hell's Hand on Earth, it doesn't mean you like it but you do it because of the arrangement you have - and those compels can be a bit more general.  But if you take a moderate mental consequence of Thoughts of Slaughter and Sin, those compels are going to be very specific and might push you closer to Hell's side...

That's how I see it.
Title: Re: Sponsors and debt
Post by: wyvern on December 08, 2015, 09:25:24 PM
More to the point, if you have a sponsored magic and you do not have a related aspect that could be compelled even without sponsor debt - well, I don't really see that as a legal character build.  (With the possible exception of Soulfire as of the Paranet Papers revision - with its stress track and lack of sponsor debt, and the 'it makes you more of what you are' thing going, I don't see it as necessarily needing a separate aspect.)
Title: Re: Sponsors and debt
Post by: Taran on December 08, 2015, 10:00:46 PM
Well, more to the point, Harry might not have had an aspect that gave him Hellfire - since gaining it was an accident (or a compel)...but any consequence or debt that he took once he had it gave lasciel extra leverage on him.
Title: Re: Sponsors and debt
Post by: Haru on December 08, 2015, 11:18:39 PM
To be fair, charging someone to work for her sounds exactly like something Mab would do. And I don't think most of the other big players would play a different game. The price might be smaller when you're "on the clock", but not necessarily.
Title: Re: Sponsors and debt
Post by: blackstaff67 on December 09, 2015, 04:49:48 AM


Now you have a fate point to invoke your sponsor aspect to do what you'd normally do with sponsored debt.  Or to invoke it to gain some other 'favour'.
Wait, you can spend Fate Points to invoke Sponsored Magic like that?  Avoid consequences, stuff like that?
Title: Re: Sponsors and debt
Post by: dragoonbuster on December 09, 2015, 05:18:22 AM
Wait, you can spend Fate Points to invoke Sponsored Magic like that?  Avoid consequences, stuff like that?

If you have Sponsored Magic, you should have an aspect covering that fact. You invoke the aspect...Sponsored Magic works like the rest of the game's rules with aspects, the only difference is you can charge to your Sponsor's FP "credit card" and go into their Debt occasionally. So if the Aspect fits with the invocation you're attempting...of course you can invoke it.
Title: Re: Sponsors and debt
Post by: RonLugge on January 18, 2016, 08:21:56 AM
Well, more to the point, Harry might not have had an aspect that gave him Hellfire - since gaining it was an accident (or a compel)...but any consequence or debt that he took once he had it gave lasciel extra leverage on him.

As a friend pointed out to me, harry keeps his 'Tempted by Power' trouble through the entire series for a reason.  That's the aspect that ties into his Hellfire.  He's tempted by it's power -- yes, he's trying to do the wrong thing, but tapping into hellfire is still a bad idea.

It's a pretty weak aspect to represent it, but that also touched on his 'accidental' and 'involuntary' access to it.  If he'd used it enough / willingly enough, eventually he may have been forced to change another aspect to represent it.
Title: Re: Sponsors and debt
Post by: Taran on January 18, 2016, 02:03:46 PM
As a friend pointed out to me, harry keeps his 'Tempted by Power' trouble through the entire series for a reason.  That's the aspect that ties into his Hellfire.  He's tempted by it's power -- yes, he's trying to do the wrong thing, but tapping into hellfire is still a bad idea.

It's a pretty weak aspect to represent it, but that also touched on his 'accidental' and 'involuntary' access to it.  If he'd used it enough / willingly enough, eventually he may have been forced to change another aspect to represent it.

Yes, I agree.
Title: Re: Sponsors and debt
Post by: blackstaff67 on January 18, 2016, 06:26:27 PM
Okay, PC synopsis briefly restated.  PC Runecaster attempts to steal mead from the gods at Valhalla; said mead is rumored to have magical properties when quaffed by mortals.  PC gets caught in the act, but since the Norse gods approve of courage, let her keep it.  She only drinks half of it and gave the rest to her wounded and comatose brother, lying in a vegetative state in a VA hospital.  The dose she quaffed gave her a one-time upgrade in strength and recovery while the dose she gave her brother brought him out of the coma and set him on the path to recovery.
   The conflict with the gods arises because his wounds were supposed to eventually kill him (granting him a death in battle, technically).  By the gods' reckoning, she stole an einherjar from them.  The agreement with the PC and Freya is that the PC agrees to serve in an informal capacity for as long as her brother remains alive while providing the Norse gods with "plausible deniability".  She can walk away whenever she wants, keeping her powers and all...and then Freya will cheerfully collect him (Compel on Aspect #1 below).
   The jury's still out on whether or not the same dose that gave the PC such powers was exhausted in returning her brother from the dead...or if it endowed him with similar powers as well. 
  The PC does not have Emissary of Power or Marked by Power as these powers imply her working openly for the Aesir and Vanir.  As the dose specified a "one-time" upgrade, any future acquired Refresh points may only be spent on stunts or those powers that pertain to her High Concept upgrading to eventual full-blown Rune casting, Refinement, and eventually The Sight.
Powers:
Ritual (Rune-stones, Sponsored) -2
Inhuman strength -2
Inhuman Speed -2
Supernatural Recovery (Catch: Wooden Weapons--easily discoverable, common) -4 (-1)
plus two stunt purchases (I'm running a power-light game) = -9 Refresh

High Concept: Runecaster for the Paranet/Custodes Secreta/Venatori Umbrorum/Whatever
Trouble: Freya's Favorite Troubleshooter/Freya's Little Bitch/
Aspect #1: My Strength is in my Family?The things I do for my brother
#2: Minnesota DNR Officer
#3: I don't start fights, I finish them/You will not hurt these people
#4: Wendigo walks these hills
#5: From a long line of Runecasters
   This should satisfy all Aspect/Power requirements.