Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - aShorty21

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4
16
Don't forget that the guy who was driven insane was done so, not just because of the mindwhammie, but also because Molly wanted to punish him.
Both the friends were going crazy. Boyfriend was going crazy with no possible return trip because of the subconcious push by Molly.

17
This is also comparing a teenager with no magical training to sidhe with centuries or more of magical experience.
Like comparing apple seeds to apple trees :)

18
I'm not seeing that we have a single example of memories actually being removed rather than masked.
I'll go along with that. Not saying that it isn't possible (I believe it is), but I do agree that we don't seem to have an example.

19
When he and Lily couldn't give Harry any direct aid or information in Proven Guilty.
Right, then I call apples and oranges. A cumpulsion not to talk to Harry about a topic isn't the same as removing a memory, or least doesn't have to be.

20
We don't see Fix having headaches because of the compulsion he's under, and we don't see Susan having a constant headache when she's had memories removed.
What compulsion is Fix under? And the majority of the time Susan's memories were removed, she was off screen.

21
yall avoiding the point at the end where Mab admits she took his rod, ya know.
I don't think I'll forget any time Mab takes Harry's rod  ;)

But I think we are dealing with special cases. Mab just blocked the memories of the Rod. She never intended for them to always be gone. And Michael had some WG (or Angelic) aid in removing said memory block.

I totally think that Mab is capable of completly removing standard memories from Harry's mind. She may or may not be able to remove a memory from the Sight or a SoulGaze. After GS, I don't believe that any memory is irretrivably lost. I believe that someone could restore said memories from Harry's soul to his concious body.

    Now who that someone is...
    • Could a very talented ectomancer do it? I don't know; maybe.
    • How about Titania? Quite possibly.
    • One of the Mothers? Sure, why not.
    • Archangel? Definetly.

22
And indeed, they can't; those memories were still right there when Harry unglamoured them.
That might of been a special case since they were tied to the soul gaze they had shared.

23
Yeah, its the bit about the position being undefined until measured that bothers me. Heisenberg be damned. I like my particles to be somewhere whether im looking at them or not. :)
Agreed.

24
The whole point of the loop/bridge time-travel concept proposed here is that there wouldn't be a time where it didn't happen. 

From Uriel's perspective, time is not linear.  Stand back far enough, and it's apparently wibbly wobbly.  By creating a permanent temporal bridge, those 5 times are linked to occur at the same time the first time.  There was no time he didn't make the prison.

Picture a piece of string.  It's linear, as mortals see time.  Now imagine that Merlin got help creating a loop, where two parts of the string overlap, like this:


Where the string overlaps itself is two separate points of time.  Now imagine a pin getting pushed through the string, bonding the two points together.  That makes them permanently bound together.  Only instead of just one loop for two points, there are 4 loops for 5 points of time.

The reason Ms Duck has an issue with it is because messing with time like that would seem to be a very high-level trick.  She thinks that it would take a WG-level talent to do it.

But Merlin clearly did it, presumably with help.  We can either assume that TWG helped, but if so, why did TWG both involving a mortal at all?  Or we can assume that one or multiple lower-tier powers (Mab, Odin, Uriel) worked together to do it. 

We know that the Ladies working together were able to channel their attack across multiple times.  So the idea that there are time-travel capabilities among the powers isn't outrageous.  By nature, Mab should be more powerful than Maeve in that aspect.

Again, the theory breaks down at why do it.  There was clearly a major, reality-level need for Merlin to create the DR prison.  If it's as difficult as Duck suspects, then it would require a reality-level need for Harry to go back.  And I can't think of one.

But if it doesn't take as much power to create a single bridge, and there were a really-really-important-reason for him to go back, then Mab and others might work together to get it done.  I still don't know why, though.
Ok I've been away for a while and I just completed my read of this thread. I wish I was in on the conversation from the begining.

With that being said, I feel like some people are having trouble grasping Griffyn's concept of the time loop/ribbon. So here is my swag at it.

Let's back up a dimension. Think in 3 dimensions. Harry climbs up a ladder. He then goes down a spiral slide. Weeeeee! He then walks away from the slide. Think of the ground as a flat plan defined by X-Y space. Think of up as the Z direction. If you are in the sky looking down at Harry, Harry passes through the same X-Y point every loop of the slide. The only difference was in the Z (up) direction. From Harry's point of view he just went down the slide and then continued on his day. From the 2D point of view he passed through the same point.

Now to step it up a notch. To realize that Harry didn't pass through the same 3D point (only a 2D) one you have to observe the 3D path as it happens. Basically you have to be able to percieve time as linear to understand how the trip down the slide works in 3D vs 2D. So now back to the time loop theory. Same basic principle but in more dimensions. Harry is walking through space and time (4D), does something magical to pass through the same point in time he has already passed through. This is only obvious and understandable if viewed from the 5th dimension. So we can only comprehend how he does it while observing in 5D.

I find the Time Travel Loop theory plausable, but unexplainable because I don't think in 5D. How do you explain height to a 2D being?

25
We've got 2 threads talking about TTH right now, so I decided to leave this one alone.  I didn't want to de-rail the discussion of the GK theory with another theory.

Gotcha, so TTHarry being a posiblity isn't a reason to discount The Gatekeeper as one.

26
Are we ignoring the Time Traveling Harry as an option? That has always been my favorite. If I get time in the near future I'll do my best to explain how I think TTHarry fits all the OP scenarios the most.

An aside: Any being that is good enough to get into the sub-basement from the NN is good enough to fix LC without Thomas even knowing they were there. So Thomas would not have to know about about the fixer in that instance.

27
Yeah, see, using your definitions, I think it's more like ....

Winter Knight, Lady, Queen, Mother are all One and Two.
Za Lord is only One
Warden of the WC is zero and One
WARDEN is only two
Kringle is definitly three and maybe two

Also, given that the mantles of the courts seem to try to change the wearer, they may be three as well but making the "mask" permanent.

I don't believe any mystical power (other than the same that any VP of Accounting has) is bestowed on the "wearer" of the Za Lord or Warden of the WC.  I don't recall any power up Harry got with the grey cloak.  Well other than authority, and while that is a power, it's not the kind of power that say the WK mantle gives.  That's ACTUAL power.

Yep, what I am getting at.

28
I suspect WK is a mantle in the odin/ santa pov; it comes with more then a power, it has an identity, awareness and name of tis own.

that's why no matter who the winter lady, for example, is they become the winter lady. thats why they all look like twins, and given time call each other sister even tho they obivously are not.

WK is the same sort of thing ;)

Agreed. Which is my definition 2 :) Or at least what I ment it to be.

29
enh im going by the order of the definitions in the dictionary :)
I was just trying to stick with my original numbering system :)

Quote
im not aware of 'mantle= power' beind used by anyone other then well, us. Does Jim even use 'mantle' for power in the books? Mehtinks we may be strecthing things here folks.

 ;D
I'm saying that 2 is a Butcher original. It is pretty much exactly what the Winter Knight power is.

Below is my inadequate long winded attempt to explain what I was trying to get at with definition 2.
Another way to look at it is this... Think about the types of powers that could be transferred on Halloween. I think we can all realize that just raw magical potential could be transferred (whole or in part) between individuals. If that raw magical potential was tied up with being Santa Claus, then if you get enough of the bits you are essentialy Santa Claus. You are what you eat. The same could not be said of being VP of accounting for Intel. VP of accounting isn't the type of power that can be transfered on Halloween, therefore it falls under Definition 1 and not Definition 2.

30
yes, thats defintion three.

One: a garment,or cloak
Two: a formal title
Three: an alternate identity, a mask, an epithet

I was thinking more...

Zero: a garment,or cloak
One: a formal title
Two: a semi-aware power
Three: an alternate identity, a mask, an epithet

In that vernacular, You don't usually get 1 without 2. Or 0 without 1. sometimes you get 2 & 3 together.

Winter Knight, Lady, Queen, Mother are both 1 and 2. Za Lord is just 2. warden of the White Council is 0 and 1. Kris Kringle is 1, 2 & 3.

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4