Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Tami Seven

Pages: 1 ... 4 5 [6] 7 8 ... 16
76
DF Books / Re: Perfect Casting Part Three
« on: February 21, 2015, 09:09:30 PM »
I'm in favor of casting with an eye on age. If done as a series, over time the actors/actresses will get older and eventually even makeup can't fake it.

I like the idea of watching the actors grow older along with the characters. Something they did well in the Harry Potter series.

77
DF Reference Collection / Re: Who Attacked Arctis Tor, and Why
« on: February 13, 2015, 05:31:29 PM »
Wait, the Black Circle and the Black Council are synonymous. The Outsiders are the Outsiders, they are not the same as the Black Council.

They may work together on occasion, but they are not the same, as far as I know.

78
DF Reference Collection / Re: Dresden Files: Series Timeline
« on: February 12, 2015, 11:30:56 PM »
It's set in February, in the days before the short story "It's My Birthday Too," which takes place on Valentine's Day.  In that story, Molly is referred to as being "just out of her teens."

So, right around this time of year. That's neat. Still, if Molly is described as being 20, that implies that her birthday was in January. Based on the Timeline estimates for the year of her birth.

79
DF Reference Collection / Re: Dresden Files: Series Timeline
« on: February 12, 2015, 04:46:24 AM »
Quote
7 ASF, May:  White Night.  Marcone becomes the first vanilla human freeholding lord under the Unseelie Accords.  Molly is 19, somehow having celebrated two birthdays in the ten months between this book and Proven Guilty, in which she was 17.

First Issue of Down Town. Harry says White Night was a few months ago, yet he also says that Molly is 20 and there is snow on the ground [at least near Harry's house]. Snow or not, it is clearly cold.

For Molly to be 20, it would have to be 2008 (8 ASF). Is this set in January 2008? Does this mean that Mollys' Birthday is in January?

80
DF Reference Collection / Re: Reference: Details of major ritual magic
« on: February 06, 2015, 03:12:41 PM »
There was a summoning ritual, can't remember which book, but it involved a doll and tobacco and the entity was the one who asked Harry why he did what he did.

Also, there was a summoning ritual in Ghoul Goblin.


81
DF Reference Collection / Re: Mab preventing use of Little Chicago
« on: February 02, 2015, 11:03:33 PM »
Not for ALL of them, so no I thought we agreed that Harry could NOT use LC unless a tracking spell would have worked.  He doesn't run home and use LC at all times.  He uses it with convenience or when he wants more out of a tracking spell other than a triangulation.   Remember when he tracked Thomas in WN?

The car analogy is this.  If a tracking spell will not work, then neither will LC.  He can do whatever he wants and LC sits there dead as a lump.  The moment a tracking spell WILL work then LC will do things.  So why would Harry use it if he had already tried tracking and it didn't work?

So, let me repeat...if a tracking spell that does not use LC would not track a target then LC does nothing.  You can do whatever you want to LC at that point and it is just a model sitting on a desk.  What LC does is allow the tracking spells to do more in Chicago than just triangulate.   The reason that LC is not useful in finding Thomas without a tracking spell is quite obvious...you would still have to cover every square inch of Chicago and then you still might not find him (because he would not be in Chicago).

If Harry felt it was worth trying a tracking spell, succeed or not, and he was home, he'd go straight for LC in a situation like that. The more he knew about the location where Shaggy was holding Thomas, the better chance Harry had to rescue him.

Using a regular tracking spell, assuming it works, means he might find himself in a dangerous place with no idea of what lie in wait for him.

The issue is not if the tracking spell would work or not, the issue is that if Harry was home and was going to try an tracking spell anyway, he'd use his best tool to do so, LC.

82
DF Reference Collection / Re: Mab preventing use of Little Chicago
« on: February 02, 2015, 07:52:16 PM »
Good and pretty accurate description of Little Chicago and what it can do, which is more than a simple tracking spell can do.

83
DF Reference Collection / Re: Mab preventing use of Little Chicago
« on: February 02, 2015, 06:04:05 PM »
We know from Proven Guilty that using LC does NOT make a tracking spell work.  It simply makes a workable tracking spell more useful (remember Harry needed more than Baby Hair?).  And there is no proof that a headache makes a suppression by Mab or that it made him forget Mouse.  So, my assertion is that making Harry not use LC was like a null...it made him use something that would not work.

You're missing the point. We have to assume that Harry would have used LC because he has done it before and he is satisfied enough with how well it works that he keeps going back to it. Would have, that is, if he had remembered to do so.

It's not for us to judge how effective LC is. If Harry thought it was a waste of time he would have dismantled it long time ago. Obviously he thinks it's worthwhile to keep and to use.

And it is fairly clear that someone didn't want Harry to use Mouse either. Tie those two together, along with, admittedly circumstantial evidence, and it clearly points to someone tampering with Harry in some way.

We Know that Mab has the power and the opportunity to do so. But, if it wasn't Mab we'd have to ask who else coudl it have been?

If it was just LC, or Just Mouse alone it wouldn't be so significant.

If it was important enough in the Plot for Harry to have his memory if it tampered with about it, then it's no where near Null.


84
DF Reference Collection / Re: Mab preventing use of Little Chicago
« on: February 02, 2015, 05:16:24 PM »
We don't know why she would not want him to use it.  Maybe it was to force him to use Demonreach.  Maybe she was worried about the backlash if it succeeded and Shagnasty tried eating his astral form.  Maybe it was something else altogether.

All we know is that the circumstances are similar to those when she'd taken his memories previously, and there's no obvious reason for Harry not to use it.
Yeah, the "Mab knows everything" thing is obnoxious.  I think it has to be a more direct reason that we're just not seeing, if she did in fact do it.  When she took his memory of fire magic before, it was to protect him from being tracked by it.  there's got to be something just as simple. I just can't think of what it could be.

Harry uses LC to find Thomas, Shagnasty kills them both leaving Morgan exposed and vulnerable, so he dies too without the traitor being exposed. Possibly Molly dies trying to protect Morgan.

Long term, Mab loses her would-be Knight, her would-be WL, the Black Circle/Council/whatever becomes more powerful.

85
DF Reference Collection / Re: Mab preventing use of Little Chicago
« on: January 31, 2015, 07:20:26 PM »
We've seen Harry use locator spells before.  and it requires triangulation.  he ends up running around rechecking his results.  but little Chicago tells your where someone or something is exactly.  that's how they located Pell's theater as the nearest point to Molly's location.  he didn't project himself astrally to do that.

my issue with him not using little Chicago is that it's obviously the most efficient tool to find him if Thomas is being held in Chicago.  not using it at all, or even mentioning considering it or specifying why he's not, is extremely odd. 

I get that using little Chicago takes effort.  but was finding Thomas not worth the effort when other things failed?  when he started growing desperate from lack of options?

I agree with this. We don't know for sure what would have happened if Harry had tracked down Thomas earlier, but best case scenario would have been that Harry rescues Thomas before Shagnasty really starts torturing him.

Uriel had said to Harry that it wasn't his fault Thomas got tortured.....perhaps it's fair to say that it was Mab's fault.

86
DF Reference Collection / Re: Mab preventing use of Little Chicago
« on: January 31, 2015, 05:04:16 PM »
But without the amulet or some sort of connection, Harry couldn't use LC.  He'd otherwise basically have to slightly more quickly search everywhere manually.

He could use his blood, it might have been enough.

87
DF Reference Collection / Re: Mab preventing use of Little Chicago
« on: January 31, 2015, 04:22:24 PM »
Ah, ok.  For some reason I thought he used the amulet to find Elaine earlier, and got confused.

Of course, that also means that Harry didn't need LC to find Thomas via the Amulet in the first place.

As I said, Harry did need LC in TC. Thomas wasn't wearing his amulet because Shaggy took it from him.

88
DF Reference Collection / Re: Mab preventing use of Little Chicago
« on: January 31, 2015, 11:04:00 AM »
Reminder, in TC Thomas didn't have his amulet  since Shaggnasty had taken it from him and used it to prove to Harry and Lara that he really did have Thomas captured.

The blood thing might have worked, though there may have been other ways to do it.

89
DF Reference Collection / Re: Mab preventing use of Little Chicago
« on: January 31, 2015, 02:15:37 AM »
What's to say that Mab didn't nudge shagnasty after Morgan? Its a variable outcome to know if Thomas would be kidnapped, but just brining shaggy into play increases the odds, especially when Mab knows about Thomas and that is a hot button when it comes to Harry.

Mab didn't really need shagnasty, she could have found another, maybe someone from Winter, to kidnap Thomas. Not unlike the fetches kidnapping Molly. In theory anyway.

Hey, maybe Mab hired Shagnasty to kidnap Thomas. Maybe Shagnasty owed her a favor and this was his way of repaying the debt.

90
DF Reference Collection / Re: Mab preventing use of Little Chicago
« on: January 31, 2015, 12:55:00 AM »
I like the theory that Mab had wiped the memory of LC well before hand. It makes sense. Yet, as good as Mab is at playing chess, could she really be sure that Harry would go to Demonreach as a result of her meddling? And what if Shagnasty had killed Thomas...how would that have affected her plans, especially if Harry figures out what she did and held her responsible?

I can see her doing it, yet there is something about it that bothers me. Maybe it's that she would have had predicted that Shagnasty would show up and abduct Thomas. How could she have known that? How could she have known that Harry would have an urgent need to use LC and that keeping him from doing so would lead him to Demonreach?


Pages: 1 ... 4 5 [6] 7 8 ... 16