ParanetOnline

The Dresden Files => DFRPG => Topic started by: iago on June 20, 2007, 06:49:44 PM

Title: Comments thread for "The Laws of Magic: Part 3 of 8"
Post by: iago on June 20, 2007, 06:49:44 PM
Part three is up -- I bumped it up to Wednesday since I realized Wednesdays would be a lot easier for me to do regularly.

http://www.dresdenfilesrpg.com/news/archives/2007/06/post.php
Title: Re: Comments thread for "The Laws of Magic: Part 3 of 8"
Post by: Rel Fexive on June 20, 2007, 07:19:48 PM
It's definitely one of the simpler ones... since there's likely to be no Whoops, accidentally changed you into a frog!  Didn't mean to do that!  Sorry! moments.
Title: Re: Comments thread for "The Laws of Magic: Part 3 of 8"
Post by: iago on June 20, 2007, 07:27:54 PM
It's definitely one of the simpler ones... since there's likely to be no Whoops, accidentally changed you into a frog!  Didn't mean to do that!  Sorry! moments.

That spawns an interesting question to be put to the forum, then: can you think of any grey areas where accidental transformations might occur? 

What about transformations that aren't into animal forms -- twisting someone's body (perhaps robbing them of the use of their limbs), but still leaving them a thinking person?
Title: Re: Comments thread for "The Laws of Magic: Part 3 of 8"
Post by: 13x13 on June 20, 2007, 07:36:29 PM
I always consider transformations exactly like magical healing. The process is so complex, and requires so much guidance, that to do it right takes a mind that humans haven't developed yet.  It requires a level of multitasking, shear intellectual horsepower, super human will, and vast magical power it is essentially inaccessible by humanity in it's current state. 

If you want to get rid of someone, and use magic why bother with transformation. It would be easier and more simple to just kill them some other way.

Title: Re: Comments thread for "The Laws of Magic: Part 3 of 8"
Post by: Matrix Refugee (formerly Morraeon) on June 20, 2007, 08:00:56 PM
It'll also put the kibosh on any god-moding Mary Sue wizards who try turning their enemies into toads or something as stoopid.
Title: Re: Comments thread for "The Laws of Magic: Part 3 of 8"
Post by: taralon on June 21, 2007, 01:04:20 AM
The only real grey area I see in this law, is what if a Wizard, say like Harry, had been teaching the Alphas to transform instead of Tera West?  Though he would not *directly* be changing their form, he would be accessory to it.  Would he then, ala Toot Toot be persecuted by Morgan for "transforming another"? 

White Night Spoiler
(click to show/hide)


Title: Re: Comments thread for "The Laws of Magic: Part 3 of 8"
Post by: mikeryan on June 21, 2007, 03:43:54 AM
This Law is about the most problematic of them all for me.

I'm not sure if it's mentioned explicitly, but in general the Laws seem to fit with the real world Wiccan Rede. "An' it harm none, do what thou will."

For the rest of the Laws, the harm is not only pretty obvious, but we have explicit examples from the books. We've seen what happens when you twist the will of a mortal, or what can happen when you reach beyond the Outer Gates.

This Law seems murkier to me. In Fool Moon Harry says that the harm is destruction of the personality. Bob corrects him though, saying that most personalities can survive a transformation. So how do you define harm, and if there is no harm, is it really Black Magic?

Going back to an earlier question about "accidental changes"...I don't like the idea of a spell that was not supposed to transform anyone accidentally transforming them. That has no interest for me. But we have seen that young magicians who are learning about their powers (and may be ignorant about the laws) have a kind of wish fulfillment thing going for them. So their "enemies" (school rivals, not ravening psychopaths. Usually) might find themselves with tails or weird skin diseases. Or they may feel bad that their pudgy best friend gets picked on all the time, so that friend wakes up with a Bowflex body. Or their significant other (boy or girl) wakes up to other, ahem, blessings.

Along those later lines, I can see adult wizards being paid truckloads of money for those exact same services. If the subject truly wants it, is it Black Magic? Maybe, maybe not. Good intentions didn't really help in Proven Guilty (other than getting the Doom instead of the Sword).

And didn't Harry transform him and Susan into wind (temporarily) in Storm Front?

So confusing.
Title: Re: Comments thread for "The Laws of Magic: Part 3 of 8"
Post by: iago on June 21, 2007, 05:33:10 AM
If you ask me, I think this law is as much about robbing the victim of his or her personal freedom by trapping them in a form not their own.  But it is a potential oddball in the bunch, I'll grant that.
Title: Re: Comments thread for "The Laws of Magic: Part 3 of 8"
Post by: Rel Fexive on June 21, 2007, 07:20:01 PM
That would seem to be the way it would most often come up, yes.  Makes sense; it might be easier to magic away someone's arms and legs for torture/punishment purposes than to make them into a dog, or render them horribly sightless or unable to speak... and this Law would be the one to cover these acts.
Title: Re: Comments thread for "The Laws of Magic: Part 3 of 8"
Post by: Douglas on June 21, 2007, 09:11:57 PM
This Law is about the most problematic of them all for me.

I'm not sure if it's mentioned explicitly, but in general the Laws seem to fit with the real world Wiccan Rede. "An' it harm none, do what thou will."

For the rest of the Laws, the harm is not only pretty obvious, but we have explicit examples from the books. We've seen what happens when you twist the will of a mortal, or what can happen when you reach beyond the Outer Gates.

This Law seems murkier to me. In Fool Moon Harry says that the harm is destruction of the personality. Bob corrects him though, saying that most personalities can survive a transformation. So how do you define harm, and if there is no harm, is it really Black Magic?

From Fool Moon pg. 60:

Quote
I glanced up at him.  "Transmogrification?  That's illegal, Bob.  It's one of the Laws of Magic.  If you transform someone into an animal, it destroys their personality.  You can't transform someone else without wiping out their mind.  It's practically murder."

Yeah.  Neat, huh?  But actually ,most personalities can survive the transformation.  For a while at least.  Really strong wills might manage to keep their human memories and personality locked away for several years.  But sooner or later, they're irretrievably gone, and you're left with nothing but a wolf.

Yes the personality can survive the initial transformation, but even if the transformation was done well enough to allow you to survive this is a truly cruel thing to do.  Think about weeks and months of your personality and mind bleeding away bit-by-bit.  We are talking incredibly slow torture here, even without the violation of will inherent in altering another being's fundamental nature.  How is that not harming someone?  Even assuming that the wizard performing the spell is good enough to do it and make a viable body, all it's doing is prolonging the slow decline into non-sentience.

Actually this could be a really fun thing to do to a character, if the player was up to roleplaying it.  Trying to interact with the world without the power of speech, or even proper control over the new body could be a really neat roleplaying experience.  Assuming they get back to being human eventually.
Title: Re: Comments thread for "The Laws of Magic: Part 3 of 8"
Post by: finarvyn on June 22, 2007, 02:40:23 AM
I see this law as being somewhat tricky, depending upon the style of the campaign.

Certainly, transforming someone against their will is a bad thing, the same way that trying to alter a person's thoughts against their will is a bad thing.

The grey area is this: what if a person wants to be transformed? I don't think that Harry has ever encountered such a thing, and in fact the werewolf belts from FOOL MOON give the impression that a person who is transformed may lose their sense of self. However, suppose a situation comes up where a character wants to be transformed for some reason? Perhaps the group needs a person to be able to fly to the top of a cliff to grab an item up there and a player volunteers to be turned into a large bird to accomplish the task?

I'm not saying that I would allow such an action in my Dresden campaign, but I really hate to fall back on the "sorry, but it's a rule" defense in order to dis-allow a clever action proposed by a player.

Just a thought....
Title: Re: Comments thread for "The Laws of Magic: Part 3 of 8"
Post by: Rel Fexive on June 22, 2007, 11:32:56 PM
It seems to be much like the enthral Law; sure, you can do it, but the "protect the mind" part is probably the trickiest part and subject to all the dangers that are present when you try to "nicely" mind control someone, since that is in essence what you are doing.  You can't account for everything, and there's your unconscious issues to deal with too, so most wizardly types will be unable to do it right.  You'd probably get the enthralment backlash, too, and hence lawbreaker stunts and so forth.

So there are really two components to this: the mental damage you do indirectly by forcing someone (if the subject is unwilling) into a body not their own, and the damage you do by imperfectly "protecting" their mind while doing it.  Double trouble.
Title: Re: Comments thread for "The Laws of Magic: Part 3 of 8"
Post by: Relooc Reeb on June 30, 2007, 11:30:32 AM
Ok maybe its just me but my first thought was about cosmetic changes.. is it illegal to make your girlfriend hotter? (with her permission/without?)  larger brests? smoother skin...removing scars.. whatever else but the modifications would be small to negligent in this as you are not actually changing it from what it is.. And what about changing yourself.. make yourself a little stronger.. faster.. Not inhumanly so.. but some people who dont normally work out much would probly not mind being even just in good shape. Now granted it would probly be better to use a temperary potion for the self improvments as anything other than temperary might be a slippery path down to dark magic ending with tenticals comming out of your head so you can hold your coffee as you type.
Title: Re: Comments thread for "The Laws of Magic: Part 3 of 8"
Post by: iago on June 30, 2007, 03:47:19 PM
Ok maybe its just me but my first thought was about cosmetic changes.. is it illegal to make your girlfriend hotter? (with her permission/without?)  larger brests? smoother skin...removing scars.. whatever else but the modifications would be small to negligent in this as you are not actually changing it from what it is.. And what about changing yourself.. make yourself a little stronger.. faster.. Not inhumanly so.. but some people who dont normally work out much would probly not mind being even just in good shape. Now granted it would probly be better to use a temperary potion for the self improvments as anything other than temperary might be a slippery path down to dark magic ending with tenticals comming out of your head so you can hold your coffee as you type.

I think you just came up with a *fantastic* bad guy concept there. :)
Title: Re: Comments thread for "The Laws of Magic: Part 3 of 8"
Post by: Matrix Refugee (formerly Morraeon) on July 02, 2007, 10:48:40 PM
Ok maybe its just me but my first thought was about cosmetic changes.. is it illegal to make your girlfriend hotter? (with her permission/without?)  larger brests? smoother skin...removing scars.. whatever else but the modifications would be small to negligent in this as you are not actually changing it from what it is.. And what about changing yourself.. make yourself a little stronger.. faster.. Not inhumanly so.. but some people who dont normally work out much would probly not mind being even just in good shape. Now granted it would probly be better to use a temperary potion for the self improvments as anything other than temperary might be a slippery path down to dark magic ending with tenticals comming out of your head so you can hold your coffee as you type.

Personally, I think it would be a bad idea at best, a breach of the Third Law at worst. A person could get hooked on the transformations, the way people get hooked on plastic surgery and have themselves worked on to the point that they ruin their looks and/or their health.
Title: Re: Comments thread for "The Laws of Magic: Part 3 of 8"
Post by: Priscellie on July 09, 2007, 03:03:00 AM
On the other hand, there's the following conversation between Harry and Bob in Fool Moon.  There's no mention of the illegality of such an act...

Quote
What are we doing, now?" Bob sniggered. "More weight-loss potions?"

"Look, Bob," I said. "That was only to get me through a rough month. Someone's got to pay the rent around here."

"All right," Bob said smugly. "You going to get into breast enhancement, then? I'm telling you, that's where the money is."

"That isn't what magic is for, Bob. How petty can you get?"

"Ah," Bob said, his eye lights flickering. "The question is, how pretty can you get them? You aren't a half-bad wizard, Dresden. You should think about how grateful all those beautiful women will be."

I snorted and started cleaning off a space on the center table, stacking things up to one side. "You know, Bob, some of us aren't obsessed with sex."

Of course, that was way back in the second book, and the magical rules have changed a bit as Jim has grown as a writer.  Just thought it bore mentioning. :D
Title: Re: Comments thread for "The Laws of Magic: Part 3 of 8"
Post by: iago on July 09, 2007, 03:43:28 PM
Plus, Bob is not that much up on the whole human morality thing.  There's nothing saying Bob won't occasionally advocate breaking a Law.
Title: Re: Comments thread for "The Laws of Magic: Part 3 of 8"
Post by: SoulCatcher78 on July 12, 2007, 03:48:27 AM
That spawns an interesting question to be put to the forum, then: can you think of any grey areas where accidental transformations might occur? 

What about transformations that aren't into animal forms -- twisting someone's body (perhaps robbing them of the use of their limbs), but still leaving them a thinking person?

*cue angent Smith voice* Mr Anderson ( I sooo couldn't help that one).

Accidentally sealing someone mouth shut (or worse yet, their throat) when what you were trying to do was Silence them.  Wild talent mistake rather than a full on Wizard screw up but still a possibility.
Title: Re: Comments thread for "The Laws of Magic: Part 3 of 8"
Post by: Matrix Refugee (formerly Morraeon) on July 28, 2007, 01:20:45 AM
*cue angent Smith voice* Mr Anderson ( I sooo couldn't help that one).

Accidentally sealing someone mouth shut (or worse yet, their throat) when what you were trying to do was Silence them.  Wild talent mistake rather than a full on Wizard screw up but still a possibility.

Great minds -- or "Matrix" fans -- do think alike!
Title: Re: Comments thread for "The Laws of Magic: Part 3 of 8"
Post by: Kristine on August 02, 2007, 09:17:07 PM
Quote
That spawns an interesting question to be put to the forum, then: can you think of any grey areas where accidental transformations might occur? 

What about transformations that aren't into animal forms -- twisting someone's body (perhaps robbing them of the use of their limbs), but still leaving them a thinking person?

Let me count the ways...But really, I think flegling wizards might have a few accidental transformations.   If I wanted to change myself into a lion but I really don't know too much about lions I might end up a human with a tail, a mane and long teeth.  It would also stand to reason that untrained magic users who are not under the supervision of a trained practitioner (read; future warlocks/sorcerers and/or headless corpses) might tell their friends about their new found powers and, like 'the jedi mind trick', try the 'Disney - Sword in the Stone' -Merlin with Aurthur, tricks.   Once again if the newly minted mage doesn't know that much about the animal he is trying to transform the person into, his/her friend could wind up the one with the fangs, mane and tail.  Then comes the question of how to change them back - do they know every aspect of the friends apperance?  Would the friend look like how the magic user thinks they look?  If you can't visualize what they had looked like clearly will your friend end up looking like melted wax?  Can you use a picture for visualizations for both the change to and from?  If you don't know how gills work can you transform someone into a fish?

I can see alot of these things being a GM's call in the game or you would need and 'accident' transformation table.

Other circumstances where transformations might be 'accidental':

1. Fledgling wizard (I think they would need more training for this one) is a lifeguard and when he/she can't save a drowning person transforms them instead into something that can breath water with the logic that they are better off changed than dead.

2. Fledgling practioner knows a friend who is in a bad home situation - abuse, neglect, basically unhappy - and changes friend into a 'stray' dog to adopt, with the thought to change the person back when authorities stop looking for them.

3. Fledgling practioner knows someone with a degenerative disease or birth defect (scoleosis, club foot, cleft palatte...etc.) and tries to 'cure' the problem by reshaping the flesh.

4.  Fledgling practioner tries to give themself and or friend the ability to fly but visualizes a bird instead of wind and kenetic energy.

that's a few I can think of...
Title: Re: Comments thread for "The Laws of Magic: Part 3 of 8"
Post by: cephis on August 04, 2007, 12:30:24 PM
I think whosit or whatsit has a point.  Hunter-spirits might not all unleash the darker side of humanity.  I'm sure Injun Joe could turn you into a fine racoon if you had the mind to.  and the Hexen Wolf belts were given with evil intentions like in exchange for you soul, but I think that Harry, with Bobs help, make a "anchor" to keep a practisioner safe.  True he would be hunted down and killed by the white counsel but hey, what life without risk? 
Title: Re: Comments thread for "The Laws of Magic: Part 3 of 8"
Post by: Isengrim on August 06, 2007, 07:51:42 PM
I think that this is definitely a law that requires a lot of interpretation. There are several applications of magic that you can do that certainly are transformations. Giving people the ability to resist the addictive spit of the red vampires for a short time for example. In effect you are transforming someone slightly, or at the very least it is possible to get this effect. So the question is: just exactly which kinds of transformations are legal?
Title: Re: Comments thread for "The Laws of Magic: Part 3 of 8"
Post by: Slife on August 12, 2007, 11:13:45 PM
Or grafting ectoplasmic wings onto yourself so you can fly (admittedly, you'd need to practice beforehand to be able to use them, but it's simply amazing how well the human mind can adapt to new wetware.)

Or, for that matter, wolverine style claws/webbed feet for swimming/thickened skin/exoskeleton/enhanced fingernails.  Or modification of hair color, facial features, skin color.  Temporarily adding what looks like fat around your waist would be relatively easy.  Disguises ahoy!

Advanced study would be risky things that mess around with organs, like temporary gills or poison spurs.  But you shouldn't really need to do those, since a waterbreathing potion would work just as well, and poisoned ankle spurs are only used by platypii, so they can't be too useful.

And notice that you're not robbing anybody of their freedom, or putting anyone's life at risk.  No modification of the brain, no modification of preexisting tissue, no transformation without consent, and no questions of morality (Making a hang-glider out of ectoplasm is OK, adding wings is just taking it to the next level). 

Admittedly, transforming yourself is only covered under the law if the warden takes an extremely liberal interpretation of it ("transform another" isn't quite relevant).  Unfortunately, wardens typically do have broad views of illegal activity.
Title: Re: Comments thread for "The Laws of Magic: Part 3 of 8"
Post by: DrygonDM on August 13, 2007, 05:14:16 PM
Quote from: iago on June 20, 2007, 01:27:54 PM
Quote
Can you think of any grey areas where accidental transformations might occur?

What Tera West was doing, is indeed a Grey Area as far as the Laws were concerned.
(1) She did not kill anyone. (2) She did not transform them; she taught them to transform themselves. She also made sure to teach them to “return to themselves”. This meant that they would not be stuck as wolves. (3) She did not invade their minds
(4) She did not Enthrall them, or even use Blackmail; they were willing participants.
(5) She did not go beyond the borders of Death. (6) She did not Walk against the Stream of Time. (7) She did not open any of the Outer Gates.

So, she did not actually break any of the Laws. Which is why Harry never reported her to the Council.

This also answers taralon’s querry if Harry did it: If he used his own power to change them, or gave them Hexenwolf belts then he would be guilty, if he trained them the same way that Tera West did, he would not be guilty.

Quote
can you think of any grey areas where accidental transformations might occur? What about transformations that aren't into animal forms -- twisting someone's body (perhaps robbing them of the use of their limbs), but still leaving them a thinking person?

Proven Guilty showed us a little of what can happen when a Magus/Warlock does things to anyone else. Even the best intended alterations to another person, especially against their will, can cause them a world of hurt. But let’s say that this time they were willing, there are way to many unknowns about the Human Body that even a skilled Surgeon would not be able to tell you all the side affects of skin grafting, much less the magical version of plastic surgery.

Personally, I think it would be a bad idea at best, a breach of the Third Law at worst. A person could get hooked on the transformations, the way people get hooked on plastic surgery and have themselves worked on to the point that they ruin their looks and/or their health.

Quote
What are we doing, now?" Bob sniggered. "More weight-loss potions?"

"Look, Bob," I said. "That was only to get me through a rough month. Someone's got to pay the rent around here."

"All right," Bob said smugly. "You going to get into breast enhancement, then? I'm telling you, that's where the money is."

"That isn't what magic is for, Bob. How petty can you get?"

"Ah," Bob said, his eye lights flickering. "The question is, how pretty can you get them? You aren't a half-bad wizard, Dresden. You should think about how grateful all those beautiful women will be."

I snorted and started cleaning off a space on the center table, stacking things up to one side. "You know, Bob, some of us aren't obsessed with sex."

Again, any living creature’s body is impossibly complex, and changing a person’s body to another creature’s body form can have a lot of “oops” potential.
I suppose that it is possible for Harry to have done the ‘breast enhancement’ potion business, but there are no guarantees that the effects would truly be permanent. Just like there were no guarantees that the “weight loss” potions were permanent – they would still be suggested to switch to a healthy diet, and to exercise regularly to keep the weight off.

White Night Spoiler
[quote auther=taralon link=topic=3593.msg84734#msg84734 date =1182387860]

White Night Spoiler (Highlight with your mouse to read)
(click to show/hide)

(click to show/hide)


The grey area is this: what if a person wants to be transformed? I don't think that Harry has ever encountered such a thing, and in fact the werewolf belts from FOOL MOON give the impression that a person who is transformed may lose their sense of self. However, suppose a situation comes up where a character wants to be transformed for some reason? Perhaps the group needs a person to be able to fly to the top of a cliff to grab an item up there and a player volunteers to be turned into a large bird to accomplish the task?

I'm not saying that I would allow such an action in my Dresden campaign, but I really hate to fall back on the "sorry, but it's a rule" defense in order to dis-allow a clever action proposed by a player.

Again, if there are learning to use magic to change themselves into another “natural creature” and back again, this should not really be a problem.

Or grafting ectoplasmic wings onto yourself so you can fly (admittedly, you'd need to practice beforehand to be able to use them, but it's simply amazing how well the human mind can adapt to new wetware.)

Or, for that matter, wolverine style claws/webbed feet for swimming/thickened skin/exoskeleton/enhanced fingernails.  Or modification of hair color, facial features, skin color.  Temporarily adding what looks like fat around your waist would be relatively easy.  Disguises ahoy!

I actually think that ectoplasm is simply considered a tool, and so long as it does not do permanent harm to any living “mortal” – of which Wizards technically are a part of – then it is alright. Adding an Ectoplasmic addition that last only for the duration of the spell, is fine. Changing a person’s body to get the same affect, is ileagle.

I think whosit or whatsit has a point.  Hunter-spirits might not all unleash the darker side of humanity.  I'm sure Injun Joe could turn you into a fine racoon if you had the mind to.  and the Hexen Wolf belts were given with evil intentions like in exchange for you soul, but I think that Harry, with Bobs help, make a "anchor" to keep a practisioner safe.  True he would be hunted down and killed by the white counsel but hey, what life without risk? 

The Hexenwolf belts that Harry saw showed that these Hunter-spirits tend to blend their thoughts with those of the person that they are “helping”.
I suppose that if the Wizard found “Friendly” Hunter-spirits - like the spirits of true wolves (remember that wolves are not inherently evil, but angry wolves are driven towards killing) - then it would be possible to create a non-harmful Hexenwolf. I would say that this would still break the Second Law, and if either of them got caught they would be killed.

Perhaps as a training guide? Something to allow the young Wizard to get the “feel” of the new body, and then shown how to duplicate this on their own ??.....