Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Sheaman3773

Pages: [1] 2
1
DF Reference Collection / Re: Questions for Jim 2012 style 2
« on: October 12, 2012, 03:48:36 AM »
Does that mean that you don't find it helpful, or that you would prefer official confirmation?

2
DF Reference Collection / Re: Questions for Jim 2012 style 2
« on: October 12, 2012, 02:52:18 AM »
I understand what you are seeing, but perhaps I can give you some figurative language that might help.

Think of aging as your body's response to the increasingly heavy weight of time weighing on your body. When you get something that freezes you in time--a Denarian coin, becoming a Rampire--then all of the additional weight keeps piling up, but it's prevented from actually affecting the body by this power. When the power is gone, all of that weight falls on them, instantly aging them as much as if they had not had the power. Or, if you assume accelerated aging like in the DV rather than instant, what was keeping the weight off is no longer supported, so the weight starts falling through, more and more of it piling on the person, until they die.

Now, that's obviously not a comprehensive theory, given that organisms grow into their prime before they begin weakening, but it might be illustrative to think of it in that manner.

3
DF Reference Collection / Re: Questions for Jim 2012 style 2
« on: October 11, 2012, 01:49:35 PM »
I'm asking because it's one of the mechanics questions that occasionally bugs me (the other being why things instantly age to death when something stopping their aging is removed, shouldn't they just go back to aging as normal?).
Quintus Cassius was more than old enough to have been instantly aged to death, but instead he merely started aging at an extremely accelerated rate. He described it as a balancing effect, the aging process making up for lost time, etc.

I tend to like the explanation that it was all of the entropy that was being held off hitting them all at once, though obviously that argument fails when brand-new immortals react the same way as the ancient ones.

4
DF Reference Collection / Re: Mouse's Origins
« on: September 28, 2012, 12:08:33 AM »
Or Mrs. Mouse is the puppy that Harry didn't necessarily save.

5
DF Reference Collection / Re: Questions for Jim 2012 style 2
« on: September 26, 2012, 07:00:19 PM »
What! We have WOJ that the White God really is the Creator in the DresdenVerse?
(And not good public relations.)
No. But lots of people like to assume.

6
DF Reference Collection / Re: Questions for Jim 2012 style 2
« on: September 21, 2012, 11:32:44 PM »
Well, I don't know about Odin, but let's not forget the part when a possessed Murph called the Lords of Outer Night false gods, pretenders, and usurpers of truth. I figured their crimes against the Mayans included lying about being their gods.
Ah, excellent point, I had forgotten that at the time of my posting.

7
DF Reference Collection / Re: Questions for Jim 2012 style 2
« on: September 21, 2012, 03:15:23 PM »
Sheaman3773, do you happen to remember where that's from? I've been looking for it for months, to no avail (mostly because The Curious Fan challenged me to find it, and I failed). Could you please point me to it?
I'll try to remember where I saw it--I'm doing a read-through as research for a fanfic I'm plotting, if I see it I'll try to remember to come back and post it here.

8
DF Reference Collection / Re: Questions for Jim 2012 style 2
« on: September 21, 2012, 03:13:39 PM »
Belief Empowers Deities, not quite the same thing.  And thats just how it works for entities that have adopted those roles, like Odin or the Red King.  The WG was on the ground floor of Creation, by WOJ (as a corollary to the WOJ that says Uriel was the Senior VP of Creation)
Point of order: that's not precisely what the WoJ says.
Quote
The presence of an Archangel, essentially an executive VP of Creation, probably had something to do with it.
People confuse the indefinite article for the definite one and then over-inflate the significance.

But that's not my point. I saw absolutely nothing in the text to indicate that the Odin we met was not the original Odin, and unless I'm forgetting something, nothing to indicate that the Reds weren't the original Mayan gods besides a moment of speculation from Harry "Unreliable-Narrator" Dresden. If there was textual support for that, please remind me of where it is.

So, given that we (currently) have no proof that Odin is any less real than TWG beyond Judaism, Christianity, and Islam being so very much more popular, that implies that the various creation myths are all true too, Susanoo and the backs of turtles right along with the Let There Be Light. So why must TWG be the only one who created the universe? I suppose it's possible that whichever religion produces the strongest deity at the moment could be the "true" story of creation at that time, but frankly that's a little distasteful, at least to me.

And, finally--we know that belief can create power wholesale, ala the Shroud of Turin. Does it really seem impossible to you that in the DV, thousands and millions and billions of people all believing in a deity couldn't make it come into existence?

9
DF Reference Collection / Re: Questions for Jim 2012 style 2
« on: September 21, 2012, 02:00:15 PM »
The faeries have said the exact same sentiment (though different wording) as the Fallen, that of being around long before us puny humans (and, I believe with lower confidence levels, of being around long before anything else). Who's to say whether it all seems true to them, even if it's factually false?

If belief creates deities, then would not TWG have come into being believing the beliefs about him were true? Would not perforce the Angels, Fallen or not, also believe the same thing?

10
DF Reference Collection / Re: The YLC (Why Little Chicago) thread
« on: September 18, 2012, 09:22:31 PM »
Possibly, but I'm not remembering any other supporting evidence for that model off the top of my head.
How about how Bob made Harry order him to unlock those memories in the first place?

Indeed, but he does seem to have a tendency to get into situations where looking for extra power is necessary despite his preferences.
Granted.

Which allusion ?

Lash telling Harry about the ingredients for the Darkhallow, I was slightly misremembering: DB, pb, p.373, Harry reports it to Butters and we don't see it directly. (I suspect there is something in there we need not to see, fwiw.). "The last several years have seen some serious magical turbulence around Chicago.  Kemmler's disciples can put the turbulence to work for them too." is the line I am reading as indicating that the boundary between our world and the NN is still in flux, and that that is being useful to Kemmlerites, and that that could have been planned by Mavra

If you mean the Unseelie Incursion of 199-something when Milwaukee vanished, I am pretty sure it's in SF but it's an aside of Harry's and I'm not at all sure where in the text; maybe we should ask one of our betas with searchable e-texts.
No, I remember the Unseelie Incursion one, that was discussed the first time Harry was describing Susan/Arcane in SF.

Ah, I see. Well, while it is certainly interesting enough that I'll be including it in my fanfic if it ever gets off the ground, I'm not completely convinced that it is canon. I had assumed previously that he was talking about all of the crap that kept going down in Chicago. But if you're right, and Mavra directly planned it that way, why make sure it's in Chicago? Because she knew that she'd have access to blackmail material on the local White Hat at just the right time? Though...I suppose you could argue that Mavra, working with Cowl, delayed the instigation of the Darkhallow until she had the blackmail material needed to get Harry involved...in order to create a situation in which the RC exposed themselves, in order to extend the war further...but how could they have known that Harry would manage to stop Cowl just in time? I'll buy that Cowl was sure that he could stop Grevane in time, but they counted on Harry recovering, breaking a Law of Magic so that he could survive to get close enough to the funnel to stop Cowl? It was really close--what was their backup plan if the Erlking had just killed Dresden right off or whatnot, pretend to fub it up at the last second?

Predicting that annoyed Faerie will exact payback does not seem to me to take very much effort, and as for the vampires making the decision to trespass on Faerie in the first place, I don't think that takes prediction so much as manipulation.  The Red Court sorcerous auxiliaries are, in this model, working with Cowl, and may well be able to sell the Reds on that being a safe thing to do if they expect to have a god-level protector imminently.
I meant more of what I said above, about how close Cowl got to god-mode.

I remain unconvinced that this is actually workable, though.  By what Harry says about gods in general in PG, most of them seem to have been actively exiled from Earth into the far NN; it would not surprise me if the process of transformation into deity was followed nigh-instantly by removal from the theatre of operations, and if Cowl knows this and the Reds do not.
So I ask again, why would Cowl play it so close if he was never intending to actually ascend? Barring any sort of time traveling theories, of course.

11
DF Reference Collection / Re: The YLC (Why Little Chicago) thread
« on: September 17, 2012, 10:22:05 PM »
Unless that command enables Bob to sever those memories permanently, it's not a solid reason and confirmation, though.  Even if Harry calmed the heck down and went off to live up a mountain and not get involved with the rest of the universe, Bob knows from the beginning that he will still outlive him; with the risks Harry takes, it could well be a lot sooner than that.
My meaning is that I thought that with a command like "Never remember that again," it might be that Bob would require a specific order to countermand the previous one, while Harry just refusing to call upon it again would leave it open to any general query about shortcuts to power.

With the sort of fights Harry gets into, I can totally see Bob worrying that Harry might ask him this sooner or later.
Perhaps, but I think it's pretty fair to say that Harry fears that aspect of himself pretty strongly. Bob might not understand it, but I would think that he would at least recognize it.

Because he has no stake in deceiving Harry.  There is a difference between "Bob can come out with plausible-sounding explanations for the Darkhallow enough to keep Cowl happy" and "Bob can come up with the actual explanation of what's going on to help Harry", and I meant the former, I am sorry if I was not clear.  In the former case Bob, still loyal to Harry, has a strong motive to feed Cowl misinformation that might get him killed, in the latter, his motive leads in exactly the opposite direction.
Aaah, I see, I missed that the thrust of your point was that Bob was frantically BSing to save his incorporeal hide. Gotcha.

I thought we had WoJ that Butters did not have any sort of magical talent.
Ah, that would be what I like to call a mental hiccup. I withdraw my objection, for the most part, and acknowledge that it could be based on the previous owner being dead. There are other possibilities, though, like intent to take ownership.

Yes, I am. I believe Lash alludes to this being the case in DB.  Furthermore, I believe the long-term damage done to that barrier is why the events of SK with the Stone Table happen around Chicago specifically, and why other supernaturals focus their major evil plans on Chicago quite so much in general despite it having a scary wizard protector.  One of my strong expectations for the BAT is that we are going to see Chicago as a whole fall into the NN for a bit - like unto the incident with Milwaukee (iirc) that Harry alludes to in SF.
Two points. 1) Could you supply the quote for that allusion? 2) That's a marvelous theory, that I shall have to consider more fully.

Unless you regard Harry's place coming under siege and Harry managing to/needing to escape as a thing that's within Cowl's power to set up.  I don't think that's entirely impossible, if one believes Cowl's allusions to working with Grevane and Corpsetaker.
I personally don't think that he did set it up, but I can buy that he could have done so if he found it necessary.

I can buy Cowl, and whatever Outsider-oriented axis of power Cowl works for (and maybe Mavra also), having a campaign objective centred on weakening, damaging, or taking control of so many supernatural power groups as possible.  That would fit with prolonging the White Council/Red Court war to maximise the damage done to both sides; it would fit with insinuating the athame into Winter, which we know from the text was provided via Cowl, and which is the most plausible vector we have for whatever form of damage happens to Lea between SK and DB and to Mab thereafter; it would fit with attempting to foment a coup in the White Court that placed one of his agents near the top, and when that failed and he was exposed, with devastating the upper echelons of the White Court with uberghouls.
I agree with you that that seems to be an objective of the BC, but the idea that they are predicted everything that happened is a bit ludicrous, I think. I'd be more inclined to think that they built that in as a Plan B, with Plan A including crushing the WC and then immediately turning around and crushing the RC. Plus, then the BC would have a protogodling on their side, which is hard to top.

12
DF Reference Collection / Re: The YLC (Why Little Chicago) thread
« on: September 17, 2012, 06:40:00 PM »
It's already clear that Harry won't be doing that before harry gives him the specific command to have those memories sleep with the fishes, though. 
Because nobody likes having a solid reason and confirmation that they won't have to do something that they are afraid to do?

Except that it took very specific and direct orders from Harry to bring those memories out in the first place. They're not something it appears that Bob does not have under control or has to worry about slipping out in the general run of things.
Yes, but presumably Harry has never told Bob "tell me everything that you can think of that could bring me more power" or "what do you know that would let me be powerful quickly?" I doubt that the black hats and psychopaths that Bob typically works for would let that possibility pass them by. And if you were going to ask why it hasn't happened before, then, I would respond that Justin was the only person who held Bob since Kemmler's final death, and presumably he had other plans for power, ones that involved Outsiders instead.

That model also works, I'm not arguing against that.  I am arguing that a) it is not the only model that works, and b) precisely how non-free will works and what Bob has in that context is really pretty murky sfaict so i am reluctant to base arguments too strongly on it.
Ah, I see. So what do you see as significant or long-term differences between our theories? If your answer is nothing, then I would suggest we drop this line of discussion.

He's very intelligent, knows a great deal about magic theory in general, and, depending on when Cowl asks him what, could well have any information he can gain from watching Grevane perform the Darkhallow to call on.  Even without that last, it does not stretch my suspension of disbelief that Bob would be smart enough to make up a plausible means for the Darkhallow out of whole cloth.
So then, when Bob told Harry in the beginning that without those memories he wouldn't be able to help Harry at all, why didn't he start spitting out theories right then? Or a few minutes later, after he had recovered some equilibrium?

We know that becoming Bob's master is not just simply an issue of whoever last handled the skull; otherwise, there would have been issues with Murphy in "Something Borrowed".  I do not believe Cowl is ever Bob's master; every other change of master that happens to Bob occurs when the previous master is dead, and I can totally believe Bob still being bound to Harry and faking it for Cowl.
It does not appear to be beyond question that the holder of the skull has to have some sort of magical talent in order to actually become the owner.

In GP ?

if you think Cowl actually wants to carry out the Darkhallow, well, it takes a lot of preparation.  It needs the Erlking book to be found, it needs the exhibition of ancient Native American stuff that Corpsetaker is preparing in the guise of Bartleby as a source of ancient zombies, it needs the boundary between Earth and the NN to be ripped up by the tormented ghost stuff in GP. (Which, come to think of it, indicates that somebody might well have been working in Darkhallow prep prior to GP; the tormented-ghosts plan is kind of overengineered for merely getting Bianca's revenge on Harry, it has a very specific side-effect of ripping up the boundary, and mavra is right there as a suspect.)  Cowl expresses active disdain for Kemmler and the Kemmlerites, and what we see of him elsewhere has no necromancy involved, so I can believe he has no real need of Bob until his plan is ready.
Given that the author is still alive and that furthermore two copies of the book were found in the same small bookstore, I don't really think that it would take that long to find a copy of the book. The Native American artifacts were useful, for a certainty, but not only do I not think it essential, there are loads of other gatherings of important artifacts, some of which that should have already been in the Museum. Also, are you suggesting that the boundary still hasn't recovered from GP to DB, what, four years later? And, to be fair, Cowl and Kumori were right there too. I would think making sure that he had the tool he needed early on would make a lot of sense--for all Harry would know, Bianca had stashed it somewhere separate from the rest of his gear, and for all Cowl knew, Harry kept Bob stashed behind layers and layers of wards. He really did luck out on Harry removing him from his defenses...

If, like me, you believe that Cowl and probably Mavra played the entirety of DB primarily to have the White Council take on Grevane and Corpsetaker and secondarily to mislead the Red Court into thinking they were about to have a necrogod ally, therefore over-reaching by trespassing on Faerie under the impression they were about to obliterate the White Council, and ensuingly getting the living daylights kicked out of them by Summer in PG, then Cowl leaving Bob with Harry makes even more sense as not tipping his hand and leaving all the pieces in the right place.
I'm not sure that I buy your rationale, but you do at least have one. Why would Cowl and/or Mavra and/or the BC want the RC smacked around? To extend the conflict?

I'd also note that one consequence of the  "Cowl was associated with the Justin/Maggie/Lord Raith cabal" notion is that it could mean Cowl has known where Bob is all along; first through knowing Justin had him, and then through knowing Harry had survived and the Council had not destroyed Bob.  (From what Luccio says about Bob in SmF, finding he had survived Kemmler's defeat after all would have been major news in the Council, so the lack of that news when Justin dies would tell Cowl someone else had retrieved Bob, and Harry's the logical prime suspect.)
Granted, and  I suppose that that suspicion could have been confirmed in GP.

13
DF Reference Collection / Re: The YLC (Why Little Chicago) thread
« on: September 17, 2012, 04:28:36 PM »
If this is the case, though, and Bob knows it, why on earth would he specifically thank Harry for ordering him to lose the memories forever ?   [ DB end of chapter 3 ]
How about because (when he's the Bob we all know and love) he hates being like that, so he was glad that Harry wouldn't be asking him to keep flipping back and forth in order to plumb that side of him for knowledge?

In your model, it makes no difference for how Bob interacts with potential future holders that Harry does so. In mine, that's the point at which he cuts off evil necroBob, and we don't have to come up with some explanation for how at a later point he managed to do so without specific instructions despite having no free will.
I'm not sure that that's completely true. To me, it seems like an order, once given to Bob, is permanent, with the exception that future orders can counter previous ones. So if he was so ordered, then it would take an order from a future master to overrule it, potentially giving Bob a much longer period of time before the memories arise again.

Exactly.
The difference between Free Will and just Will seem somewhat ambiguous, though. We know that Bob does have Will, just not Free Will. So with the understanding that whomever holds the skull controls Bob, once the skull is put down, who's to say that Bob cannot use Will to pick between two equally valid owners? Cowl did hold him last, but Harry was closer and actively seeking to reconnect their bond.

Which would be where I note that Grevane actually worked the Darkhallow, and all Cowl does is stand at the focal point at the very end.  Though I think it is entirely possible that Bob could plausibly fake enough Darkhallow lore to keep Cowl satisfied off the top of his head.
How could he fake any of it? If he cut off all of his relevant memories, then he wouldn't have anything with which to fake. More to the point, why would he even want to fake it, given that that would be disobeying his master, the one who was holding his skull?

Either following Harry around through DB or having been in Bianca's place in GP while Bob was warning people off Harry's stuff work for me.
What was your theory for why he didn't just take Bob right then?

14
DF Reference Collection / Re: Questions for Jim 2012 style 2
« on: September 17, 2012, 03:20:33 AM »
I thought that it was Archangels who had Intellectus, not all angels. The Fallen aren't Archangels, are they?

15
DF Reference Collection / Re: Questions for Jim 2012 style 2
« on: September 17, 2012, 02:32:59 AM »
With the circle barrier around her coin, I'm doubtful Lash was able to get anything from Lashiel.  And while it isn't strictly laid out, I suspect in most coin possessions, the shadow construct does have communication with the Fallen trapped in the coin, giving it access to the Fallen's Intellecteus.

However, by placing the coin in the circle, Harry circumvented this.

I mean, from Micheal's comments, you'd think that the coin would present an impossible to resist temptation.  While Lash was tempting at times, she never really came across nearly as manipulative as Michael seems to suggest.

So that's my reasoning for Intellecteus being a factor.

...

That aside, the point remains, I don't see Lash being able to work directly with Lashiel, thanks to the circle.  I think the only reason Harry might have been able to summon the coin from the circle is because it was his Will that created it.

If another Wizard had so confined the coin, that might not even be an issue.

That's an interesting set of theories. I'm rather more in favor of the idea that placing the coin within the circle didn't do anything in and of itself so much as it symbolized a conscious rejection of Lasciel. That keeps the conduit between the Fallen and her shadow open and clear, so Hellfire is fine, but the rules prevent anything more overt--which further explains Malcolm showing up in the dream the same night that the shadow created the hallucination of Sheila.

I don't really buy the Intellecteus theory, partially just in response to the large number of theories that cropped up about everything and it's cousin having Intellecteus after finding out about the island and Shagnasty, but also partially because it just doesn't read that way to me. The shadow could only do so much because of the kind of person that Harry is; tell him to do one thing and he'll probably do the opposite just out of reflex. And since she could hardly tell him to make sure he never accepted her temptations...

It's also important to remember that circles aren't perfect--even in the first book, the backlash from Harry messing up Victor's circle destroyed the one around the Beckitts, so clearly it's possible for the coin's retrieval spell to be able to brute force or finesse its way past his precautions.

Pages: [1] 2