How would the Raven fit into just doing this as a skill check?

Looking back at it, my original response might be better categorized as a Maneuver.  As a skill use Declaration it probably fits better into something similar to Scholarship's 'Declaring Minor Details'.  Something like sending your raven to fly around a building and declaring "a city bus is on the way down the road" or "there's a lot of trash in the alley". 

Using the raven in a ritual to 'see through its eyes' would probably work better as a maneuver assisting the spellcasting. 

It depends on meta-game intent.  Are you attempting to create some specific scene aspect?  Declaration.  Or are you attempting to discover something the GM will need to tell you?  Maneuver which will assist your casting or spying.

If you want it to be separate from you and capable of independent action I'd go with Nyarlathotep5150's suggestion of paying for it as an IoP.

You can use skills for Declarations also - Alertness or Lore would fit the familiar depending on whether you're sending it on a scouting mission or using it to help with spellcasting.  Depending on what the familiar is, you might allow other skills as well. 

While it's a different set of 'laws' I take the literalness of the Unseelie Accords and use that for the White Council's laws as well.  So, using an extremely literal interpretation, any magic directly causing death is a violation but using an object (or a person) enhanced by magic isn't a violation.  In addition to allowing a warden's sword this avoids getting into areas where killing someone with your fists after drinking a potion of strength can also be seen as breaking the Law.

Besides, I view the White Council as a group of disparate people and factions with differing, and often opposing, goals.  The only thing they'd agree on is a literal interpretation.  

There are a few FATE / Dresden games run via Fantasy Grounds, might check there if you're willing to purchase the software.

I thought Coke actually did have cocaine in it a hundred years ago or so, and pulled it when it became obvious how dangerous the stuff was. 

It did.

Got some new stunts, some newish stunts, and one old stunt that I had forgotten about. I'm not too certain about the quality of these stunts, though, so I'm not adding them to the master list yet. Does anybody have any constructive (or destructive) criticism?

Alertness

Protector: You are an expert at the protection of others. Whenever you use a skill to create a block to protect another character, add two to your roll.

Shouldn't this be a stunt for the skill used to create the block?  As written it doesn't seem to affect alertness but would potentially affect everything from Athletics to Weapons.  Disicipline is potentially problematic - with some creativity most armor, blocks, and veils could be phrased as 'protecting another'.

Craftsmanship:

Bunker Builder: You know how to make effective fortifications. Given time, you may fortify a zone with your Craftsmanship skill. Your Craftsmanship roll than functions as a block against entry to that zone and ranged attacks into it. Unlike most blocks, fortification is not removed as soon as it is defeated unless the action that defeated it was intended specifically to remove the fortification.

How does this differ from a Declaration using Craftsmanship?  May want to give it a +1...

Deceit:

Illusion Of Grandeur: Making a good first impression is all about misrepresenting yourself. You may use your Deceit skill instead of your Rapport skill to make a good first impression. 

Looks interesting...

Fists:

Kick The Bruise: It really hurts to take two hits to the same place. Whenever you tag or invoke a consequence to benefit a Fists attack, that attack inflicts two extra stress.
Touch Of Emotion: Mental attack, physical attack, what's the difference? You may use your Fists skill for your Incite Emotion power.
Storm Of Punches: A great warrior fights as well against a thousand enemies as he does against one. You may take a -2 penalty to a Fists attack in order to have that attack affect everyone in the zone (except yourself, of course).

Perhaps it's just me but I dislike the 'Touch of Emotion' stunt.  Doesn't fit my image of a WV.  Regarding 'Storm of Punches', have you considered phrasing it as a Spray Attack?  (Similar to Wall of Death for Weapons.)

Lore:

Occult Ceremonies: Is there really that much difference between a seance and a play? Pick a type of ritual. You may use your Lore skill instead of your Performance skill to perform that type of ceremony.

I'm not entirely clear on this one - are you performing it for entertainment or effect?

Stealth:

Among The Seaweed: You are a master of submersible subterfuge. Add two to your Stealth as long as you are at least partially underwater.

As situational as this is, you may also want to add something along the lines of "...the difficulty of moving stealthily through water borders is reduced by 2."

Presence:

Social Weaponry: The right gear can make a lousy point seem brilliant. Pick an item and a social skill. As long as you possess that item, all social attack that use that skill inflict two additional stress. Don't pick a pair that makes no sense, please.

Well...I've been following the social weaponry thread and I'm not entirely convinced.  Most seem better as an aspect.  But, if it is allowed / used, why would it require a stunt?

If you do make it a stunt, I'd consider allowing the reflexive action without taking up the next turn.  It's costly enough taking at least one stress box, if you're paying refresh for the ability it shouldn't also take your next action. 

I can't find any text stating you can't cast as a defensive reaction.  In fact, YS259 has another example that appears to be a reactive spell (a block cast when ambushed).  One other reason I considered it as standard is the stress requirement - that's an inherent limitation.  Every spell the wizard spends on reactive defense is one less spent on laying down extreme firepower. 

Here's how I stated it:

Block:  Moonlight energy only.  +2
Veil:  To appear as the moon would appear.  +12 (judged on a conservative guess of alertness/lore +6, +4 for the roll and +2 for an aspect)
Size:  Cover one zone +2
Duration:  a few days +2

for a total of complexity 18. 

Also, how would this spell be taken down?  Would it have to be dispelled with a power 18 counterspell or it's thaumaturgic equivalent?

Dispelling it would presumably require at least 14 shifts (moonlight + perception blocks) and possibly the full 18 (I'm not clear on whether dispelling needs to cover duration and area shifts.)  And noticing the spell would require 12+ shifts...  However, if it is noticed (and analyzed), it can be pierced fairly trivially.  Opening a temporary hole in the moonlight block would only require 2 shifts plus enough to cover the needed duration.  If time isn't an issue, it might be worth making that more difficult.

@Papa Gruff - I see it as two blocks, one against the moonlight and another against perceiving the spell.  So it probably needs those two shifts.  Of course that is dependent on GM.