Good for you. I'm still single, slowly rivaling Dresden as far as relations with women are concerned.

So... what can go wrong at Peace Talks...? Wait, no, let me rephrase that: What can't go wrong at the upcoming Peace Talks?

Obviously Black Council members will definitely do their best to do some sabotage. I'm suspecting some false flag operations. Probably in Chaptera 2-4.

I'm wondering how the first debate between Titania and Mab since Hastings will go. Also... there was one thing I've been wondering about for some time: In Summer Knight, at the stone table, didn't they at least exchange a few words?

Lara will push for peace for sure. It is in her best interest. Who's the leader of the Black Court? Dracula? I'm wondering about discovering further feuds between various supernatural nations. It seems like Reds got along with Blacks, but the Black Court and White Court seem to have a thing going on.

Fomor will probably try to jump in as well. The Dark Elves probably will be sticking up for Winter, because Molly.

I guess we'll wait and see... in a decade or two.

I think a lot of it is situational.  I've seen naked bodies where there was NO sex appeal, and other where I was GAh-GAh ....

I'm in a mind of the opening of "To Sail Beyond the Sunset" by Robert Heinlein.  She was totally hot and totally naked, and no one gave her a second look, because of the situation.

I didn't read the book yet, just the synopsis, and from that I'm guessing that the book probably didn't need more sex scenes...

And that's kinda weird. Stressful moments tend to help building camaraderie not point out douchebags.

If I ever end up in a lasting relationship, I'm already feeling sorry for the poor soul. I have a habit of speaking my mind with little to no censorship.

Quote from: the neurovore of Zur-En-Aargh on December 15, 2017, 09:31:43 PM

The line of thought is, you drawing a connection from Outsiders to naagloshi to necromancy-powered Black Court vampires seems to me to be lumping three disparate things into one without evidence enough to do so.

Welcome to the C.I.A. Dr. Holmes. The evidence is all there already. I can continually point it out, though if the circumstances are agreed upon is an entirely other matter.

1. Sherlock Holmes was not a Dr. . Watson was the Dr. Also: The person Holmes' character was based upon was. Which is quite funny, since House was somewhat based upon Holmes.
2. Trying to push Outsiders, Naagloshii, possibly Reds and Blampires into one group is kinda silly. What is this? Scott Pilgrim vs. The World? It's perfectly fine to have multiple actors with their own agendas in this. Makes things a lot more interesting. If it ends up Harry vs. everyone else and he's also expected to win... well... the story would suck.

Well... the Wild West wasn't really the _Wild_ west we see in movies and read about in books.

But I guess I can see your point.

Also: "When you have 1 wizard, you have a wizard. With any higher number of wizards, you'll get an argument."