ParanetOnline

The Dresden Files => DF Spoilers => DF Reference Collection => Topic started by: Serack on July 08, 2011, 02:21:47 AM

Title: Reviving my Major Lash theory post
Post by: Serack on July 08, 2011, 02:21:47 AM
This is my favorite pet theory.  It takes several theories about Lash and puts them together coming to some very interesting conclusions.  (old 2010 version link (http://www.jimbutcheronline.com/bb/index.php/topic,20728.0.html)) (dead now)

All of the WoJ's and text excerpts (xrts) are at the bottom and numbered.

My foundational Theory:
Lash used Soulfire when she rebelled against Lasciel.
I don't consider this proven, just that the reasoning and evidence behind it is strong (the same caveat goes for the rest of this post I guess).  In WK, Bob points out that the bit of soul he is missing "is energy" and says that Lash used it as the power source that allowed her to rebel against Lasciel.xrt#1  In SmF, while describing the process of how soulfire is used, Bob says that the soul is converted into energy.xrt#4  So I'm theorizing that Lash took the bit of soul Harry gave her and converted it into the energy (Soulfire) she needed to reinforce the free will Harry gave her.  This allowed her to "become a lot more of what she already was" like in Excerpt #5 and enabled her to rebel against Lasciel.

An attempt to determine who can use Soulfire
It hasn't been defined to us who can use Soulfire.  Jim has said that "angelic types have access to hellfire and soulfire.”woj#1  Also, in WK Bob says that Harry had access to hellfire because he had a tiny bit of Lasciel’s energy giving him access to it.xrt#1  This implies that an angelic being can give another being access to hell/soul fire by investing part of their energy into that separate being.  Thus we have a second set of beings who can use Soulfire.   These 2 sets of beings aren’t necessarily all inclusive, but we know of no others.

First Derivative Theory:
Lash is/was a discrete being falling into the set of beings Jim describes as "Angelic type."woj#1  In other words, Lash is an entity of angelic nature.
So now I’m going to go into supposition (that is to say this is based on varying degrees of less firm reasoning and evidence).  If Lasciel is a Fallen “angel” (aka a member of a subset of the “Angelic type” as referred to in WoJ #1), then a shadow of Lasciel existing within Harry’s subconscious (and powered by a bit of energy from this fallen angel giving him access to hellfire) would be what I would call  “angelic in nature.”  Harry has given this shadow the name Lash and thus gave it the free will that allowed it to rebel against its originator’s energyxrt#1 making it a separate, individual, entity with it's own identity.woj#4  Edit:  As a derivative theory, the foundational theory also reinforces this one if it is true.



Second Derivative Theory:
Uriel didn't give Harry Soulfire
It is my theory that if my above "Foundation Theory, and First Derivative Theory are true, then when Uriel “jostled Harry’s elbow”xrt#3 he did not invest part of his own energy into Harry to give him access, but rather nudged Harry into pulling the trigger on the Soulfire gun that was already in his hand, and made available to him through his latent connection with Lash who had already used Soulfire.  This would make Uriel’s “favor” a truly small one, and reinforces the Foundational Theory.  (props to LML for the trigger/gun analogy)

Edit, Sept 2011:  Further theorizing since the events of GS has suggested that Uriel's action here was actually to invest power into Lash, jumpstarting her back into activity with the dual purposes of giving Harry a conduit to soulfire through her, and possibly enabling her to serve the purpose of the "Parasite" mentioned at the end of GS.  See the response linked before the references below for more.

The Conclusion Derivative Theory
Lash is an Angelic entity that identifies with the heavenly hosts, but hasn’t necessarily been accepted by said “team”
I.E.  The angelic entity, Lash, upon using soulfire, not only rebelled against her originator, but chose to change her identity such as to identify with the kind of angel that uses soulfire.  I’m not saying she earned her wings, but I am saying that she switched teams. 
This is concluded from:   

Bonus Thoughts:
Even before the psychic assault that possibly damaged the parts of Harry’s brain that harbored Lash, she was already showing progressive signs of falling apart at the seams.  I think that this was probably due to Harry’s naming her and imbibing her with free will deteriorating the effectiveness of the “bit of energy” from Lasciel.  Because of this, I feel as though even without this possible psychic bullet she took, she would have had to spend some time recuperating from the psychic trauma she might have gone through just from this fundamental identity crisis.

Additionally, I am unsure (because she is definitely atypical) if the free will Harry imued her with would free her of restrictions that other, more typical angelic types as described by WoJ’s #2 and #3, seem to be subject to.  This would heavily factor into her identity

I posted a response adding new thoughts based off of the material from GS and WoJ's since the GS release here (http://www.jimbutcheronline.com/bb/index.php/topic,27090.msg1583043.html#msg1583043)

Aforementioned WoJ's and Book Excerpts

WoJ #1, Source (http://bittenbybooks.com/?p=22804) (emphasis added)
Quote from: 2010 Bitten by Books Q&A
“Does the same apply to hellfire/soulfire. What would happen if Harry were to take up Lasciel’s coin and then try to use soulfire and hellfire together? Would that result in Harry dying horribly?”
Those are different. They’re really two sides of the same coin–but they can’t really exist together like that. They aren’t explosively reactive, but they aren’t additive, either. Which one came into the person to be used would depend on the person who was using it, and what they were using it for.
Angelic types have access to both. Which one they use is partially what determines what /kind/ of angels they are.

WoJ #2, Source (http://bittenbybooks.com/?p=22804)
Quote from: 2010 Bitten by Books Q&A
“Could Uriel have chosen to help Harry if he had wanted to, or is there actually some universal limit that prevents him from directly influencing the world in such overt fashion?”
A little of both. Technically, it was /possible/ for Uriel to act directly, but the consequences would have been extreme, both for him and for the mortal world–to the point where you’d have to be moderately insane to do it. Or else, really, really committed to some kind of personal moral compass that was 90 degrees off true.
The last angel to do that is a little notorious.

WoJ #3, Source (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EXJMGtIpSXg&feature=related) @ ~6:11
Quote
Q:  Does Lasciel's shadow get to heaven because she redeemed herself?
A:  The answer to that is so complicated than is easy to give, especially without giving out extra story and ruining the fun.  No.  Lasciel's spirit didn't go to heaven.  And now, (sing song) I'm not gonna tell you.

WoJ #4, Source (http://www.jimbutcheronline.com/bb/index.php/topic,11734.msg504484.html#msg504484) (bolding added)
Quote
Will we see Lash or Lasciel again?
Lasciel’s story is not over.  And keep in mind what’s said about ‘a woman scorned.’  Also keep in mind that Lasciel is NOT Lash; Lasciel did not reabsorb the entity that Harry actually changed. (Yes, he use those words “that Harry actually changed.”)

Excerpt #1   While discussing the aftermath of the psychic attack Harry endured at the end of White Knight, Bob points out that part of Harry's soul is missing.  After some banter to say that this isn't too big a deal, the book says: (bolding added)
Quote from: WK
"If it's no big deal," I said, "then why is it so interesting?"
"Oh, well," Bob said.  "It is energy, you know.  And I wonder if maybe...maybe...well, look, Harry.  There was a tiny bit of Lasciel's energy in you, supporting the entity, giving you access to hellfire.  That's gone now, but the entity had to have had some kind of power source to turn against the essence of its own originator."
"So it was running off my soul?  Like I'm some kind of battery?"
“Hey,” Bob said, “don’t get all righteous.  You gave it to her.  Encouraging her to make her own choices, to rebel, to exercise free will.”  Bob shook his head.  Free will is horrible, Harry, believe me.  I’m glad I don’t have it.  Ugh, no, thank you.  But you gave her some.  You gave her a name.  The will came with it.”

Excerpt #2 (during the psychic attack in the deeps, Harry tells Lash to help without him calling the coin.  bolding added)
Quote from: WK
"I can't," she replied, her voice anguished.  "She would never forgive that.  Never accept me back into her...just take the coin. Harry, just take the coin.  P-please."

[and later when she agrees to actually help]

"I..."  She shook her head and said, very softly, wonderingly, "She...doesn't deserve you."
Deserved or not, the fallen angel wasn't getting me.  Not ever.
Lasciel squared her sholders and straightened.  "You're right," she said.  "It is my choice...

Excerpt #3 (The sensation Harry felt when he ended up using his Soulfire Fist of Wrath!)
Quote from: SmF
Ever been carrying something and had someone intentionally, unexpectedly jostle your elbow?  It felt something like that- a tiny but critically timed nudge just as I threw my will into a last futile effort of defiance.

Excerpt #4 (Bob is explaining Harry's Soulfire Fist of Wrath! bolding added)
Quote
"So what you're saying is that this hand construct was made out of my soul," I said.
"Your soul and your magic fused together, yeah," Bob said.  "Your soul converted into energy.  Soulfire."

Excerpt #5 (more of Bob and Harry discussing soulfire bolding added)
Quote from: SmF
I grunted.  "So what you're saying is that soulfire doesn't let me do anything new. It just makes me more of what I already am."
"A lot more," Bob said, nodding cheerfully from his shelf.  "It's how angels do all of their stuff."
Title: Re: Reviving my Major Lash theory post
Post by: Zolt on July 08, 2011, 02:37:56 AM
The main part of that theory that I have a problem with is that Lash isn't technically an angelic being. She's an imprint of a fallen angel. She's literally a part of Harry's mind that has been "flashed" with an image of Lasciel.

Then again, "that which holds the image of an angel becomes itself an angel."  So your point is valid. Also, Rashid is the 12th Doctor.
Title: Re: Reviving my Major Lash theory post
Post by: Sh33p on July 08, 2011, 02:39:47 AM
...would fit with Uriel's MO as being somewhat shrewd enough to earn Mab's favor. Would also fit with his total unwillingness to take overt action afterwards.

I get the feeling that the Angels are ultimately as clueless as any given mortal about what the White God has planned. They're just a small bit better at reading the tea leaves, and the nominally good ones are simply scared to death of breaking rules after seeing what became of their fellows.
Title: Re: Reviving my Major Lash theory post
Post by: Serack on July 08, 2011, 02:44:58 AM
The main part of that theory that I have a problem with is that Lash isn't technically an angelic being. She's an imprint of a fallen angel. She's literally a part of Harry's mind that has been "flashed" with an image of Lasciel.

Then again, "that which holds the image of an angel becomes itself an angel."  So your point is valid. Also, Rashid is the 12th Doctor.

If in order to be an angelic being, said being has to have been around since the dawn of time, then yah she isn't one.  However, if you can cleave a small part off a powerful angelic being, and it becomes it's own separate entity, I'm theorizing it is still an angelic being.

You lost me with the Rashid comment...

Edit:  Apparently it's a Doctor Who reference.  I don't really watch much TV at all, so it's lost on me...  I'm thinking maybe I should be ashamed...
Title: Re: Reviving my Major Lash theory post
Post by: habu987 on July 08, 2011, 02:47:18 AM
So your point is valid. Also, Rashid is the 12th Doctor.

It all makes sense now!  But where's the TARDIS?  Or does he keep it parked by the Outer Gates?
Title: Re: Reviving my Major Lash theory post
Post by: Powderkegger on July 08, 2011, 02:52:23 AM
It's an interesting theory. Where do you see it coming up in the story? Lash's "resurrection" as a capital-A Angel to assist Harry in some way? Screams BAT to me. If we could get Lasciel on one of Harry's shoulders and Lash on the other that'd...that'd just be super.

Also, always happy to see how many DF fans are DW fans too!
Title: Re: Reviving my Major Lash theory post
Post by: the neurovore of Zur-En-Aargh on July 08, 2011, 02:53:10 AM
If in order to be an angelic being, said being has to have been around since the dawn of time, then yah she isn't one.  However, if you can cleave a small part off a powerful angelic being, and it becomes it's own separate entity, I'm theorizing it is still an angelic being.

I have a feeling there's something in the Summa Theologica that rules that out, but it's too late for me to eyeball-grep Aquinas.
Title: Re: Reviving my Major Lash theory post
Post by: Zolt on July 08, 2011, 02:54:59 AM
If in order to be an angelic being, said being has to have been around since the dawn of time, then yah she isn't one.  However, if you can cleave a small part off a powerful angelic being, and it becomes it's own separate entity, I'm theorizing it is still an angelic being.

You lost me with the Rashid comment...
Sorry, I was making a Dr. Who crossover with these last comments, my brain kind of froze after that.

As for Lash's nature, from what we're told she's a kind of photocopy of Lasciel, but the paper she's printed on is Harry's brain. Then again, Jim refers to her as a living, thinking entity that "Harry actually did change".
Title: Re: Reviving my Major Lash theory post
Post by: Serack on July 08, 2011, 03:12:47 AM
It's an interesting theory. Where do you see it coming up in the story? Lash's "resurrection" as a capital-A Angel to assist Harry in some way? Screams BAT to me. If we could get Lasciel on one of Harry's shoulders and Lash on the other that'd...that'd just be super.

Also, always happy to see how many DF fans are DW fans too!

I get the idea that at some point Jim's ideas on what to do with Lash were rather broad brush strokes and some details like this were not fleshed out at all.  Because of this, before he wrote the Lash story, I am not sure he knew every detail of where it was going.  If I were to guess, back when he came up with the main overarching plot, he figured by book X Harry would gain a demonic influence, and by book Y he would overcome this influence.  As the actual story fleshed out, and Jim figured out how this would happen, Lash became her own separate being, and now Jim has this extra character that he has now killed off.  The following WoJ was made shortly after WK was released, and it shows me that at the point of killing Lash off, he fully intended Lasciel to come back into the picture and be a part of the future story, but didn't really know what he might end up doing about this new fully separate/self identifying being.

Quote
What roll will Lasciel play in future books?
That's going to be another one of those where I go "Hahaha, I know and you don't" because, you know, it's the whole, I want to provide for my family thing.  Were're not done with Lasciel.  We might not even be totally done with Lash, but we will have to see how that goes. 

In the years since Jim made that comment though, other people have asked about this again and Jim has explicitly said that both Lasciel, and Lash's stories are not done. 

One thing is pretty certain though.  A 100% cooperative and reliable Lash in Harry's head was too much of an overpowering advantage for Harry to have in the first half of the Series, plus she knew too much about the mysterious back story of his parents, and as such, she had to be offed.
Title: Re: Reviving my Major Lash theory post
Post by: spinningcats on July 08, 2011, 03:34:02 AM
In the years since Jim made that comment though, other people have asked about this again and Jim has explicitly said that both Lasciel, and Lash's stories are not done. 

One thing is pretty certain though.  A 100% cooperative and reliable Lash in Harry's head was too much of an overpowering advantage for Harry to have in the first half of the Series, plus she knew too much about the mysterious back story of his parents, and as such, she had to be offed.

I really hope she doesn't come back.  One of the worst parts of the books imo.  Besides being overpowered and letting Harry know or do anything when he needed to (speak any language, play the guitar, memorize anything, hellfire)  I really, really disliked the interactions with his subconcious inside his head.
Title: Re: Reviving my Major Lash theory post
Post by: Beamer on July 08, 2011, 03:56:09 AM
Would Lash changing teams have any effect on her and/or Harry’s ability to access hellfire.
This could poke a hole in your theory, place a time for her rebellion, or be completely meaningless, depending on the answer.   
Title: Re: Reviving my Major Lash theory post
Post by: HadeN on July 08, 2011, 06:50:07 AM
Would Lash changing teams have any effect on her and/or Harry’s ability to access hellfire.
This could poke a hole in your theory, place a time for her rebellion, or be completely meaningless, depending on the answer.   


I would say a definite maybe. This wouldn't do anything/ maybe actually support the theory though. Lash didn't switch and start using soulfire until the last few seconds in Harry. That means we never got to see directly if it did anything. If Uriel actually did show Harry how to use soulfire through residual energy from Lash, then her switching would probably mean he couldn't use hellfire anymore (no one would need to show him how, but he still couldn't) I would say that this point makes a good argument for her switching on its own.

Title: Re: Reviving my Major Lash theory post
Post by: Serack on July 08, 2011, 09:20:28 AM
Would Lash changing teams have any effect on her and/or Harry’s ability to access hellfire.
This could poke a hole in your theory, place a time for her rebellion, or be completely meaningless, depending on the answer.   

My take:  When Lash rebelled against her originator, the bit of lasciel's energy that was giving Harry access to hellfire was either destroyed of fundamentally changed to the point where it was no longer the same thing...  I.E. Soulfire and Hellfire are 2 sides of the same coin and that coin had now flipped.  So yah he wouldn't have access to hell fire any more (He didn't obviously) and instead he had access to soulfire, he just didn't know it/didn't know how to access it. 
Title: Re: Reviving my Major Lash theory post
Post by: Serack on July 08, 2011, 09:24:47 AM
I really hope she doesn't come back.  One of the worst parts of the books imo.  Besides being overpowered and letting Harry know or do anything when he needed to (speak any language, play the guitar, memorize anything, hellfire)  I really, really disliked the interactions with his subconcious inside his head.

I hope she comes back, but not within Harry, for the reasons you give.  All the reasons you give for her being overpowered were balanced by the fact that they came with a price.  He was slowly having his soul and identity eroded.  It's when this price went away because she had rebelled against her originator that it becomes truly overpowered, and hence she was offed.
Title: Re: Reviving my Major Lash theory post
Post by: X on July 08, 2011, 09:55:28 AM
Quote
Serack
My take:  When Lash rebelled against her originator, the bit of lasciel's energy that was giving Harry access to hellfire was either destroyed of fundamentally changed to the point where it was no longer the same thing...  I.E. Soulfire and Hellfire are 2 sides of the same coin and that coin had now flipped.  So yah he wouldn't have access to hell fire any more (He didn't obviously) and instead he had access to soulfire, he just didn't know it/didn't know how to access it.

The problem I have with this statement is that you are essentially suggesting that a mere imprint of a time immortal being was able to give Harry access to Soulfire.  The reason I think that Lash allowed Harry the use of Hellfire is because that is the nature of the Denarians.  They offer power, and Lasciel herself is known as The Temptress.  If that is her nature, then offering a small sampling of power in exchange for binding his soul is well within her nature, thus the imprint is allowed to give access to Hellfire.

Harry gave Lash, a mere shadow free will, to go against her creator, but to say that the mere shadow that was Lash gave Harry access to Soulfire, and allowed him to use it after she was no longer present within him as far as we know, I find that to be an extreme stretch.

Furthermore, in Turn Coat, Uriel himself converses with Harry, informing him of the good side actually doing something, just not in a noticeable way at first, then Mab appears and gives us a little backstory regarding Uriel.  If Lash gave Harry the ability to use Soulfire, then you are essentially saying that Jim Butcher himself planted Uriel, a freaking Archangel, in the series as a red herring.  Possible? Yes.  But I disagree.
Title: Re: Reviving my Major Lash theory post
Post by: itshim on July 08, 2011, 10:24:29 AM
I'd always considered that for Lash to exist outside of Harry's head she would need to possess some soul and she got this by taking some of Harrys when she sacrificed herself. It may be that Harry himself (through his unconcious) authorised it, as I don't know whether you can just take and use someone elses soul without it being the blackest of black magic (which would then completely change Lash and negate the point of her sacrifice).

My reading of WoJ was that Lash would be around in the second half of the series, as a ghost or something else, to help him in the nevernever.

Nigel
Title: Re: Reviving my Major Lash theory post
Post by: AcornArmy on July 08, 2011, 11:16:19 AM
I think the OP is right, at least in so far as what we think Uriel did in Small Favor was not what he actually did, or at least not exactly what he did. I've suspected that since Mab, at the end of the book, told Harry that only he would be able to answer the question of what exactly Uriel had done to him.

At the end of White Night, Harry discovered that Lash had left him a gift of knowledge in the form of musical talent. Presumably, Lash's musical talent, made a part of Harry's mind when Lash took the psychic bullet-- either by Lash's design or by chance. Serack's theory may be entirely correct, and the knack for Soulfire was also a gift from Lash, and Harry just didn't realize he had it until Uriel bumped his metaphorical elbow. Even if the truth isn't quite that direct, though, I'd guess that something of Lash's knowledge or mind did give Harry a vital piece of whatever is required in order for a human to use Soulfire.

At any rate, I think that, whatever it was Uriel did, it was something to do with Lash or Lash's remnants. And a direct side-effect of it was to give Harry access to Soulfire. I suspect it also had something to do with the way Harry's left hand was able to dextrously snatch the denarius out of the air before it could touch him, in SmF, too. "The burned hand teaches best," was the first quote Harry saw when he opened Uriel's copy of The Two Towers. Maybe Uriel did something to help Lash put herself back together, intending that Lash should become Harry's future teacher.

If that were true, though, I have no idea why she wouldn't have popped up by the time of Changes. When Harry mentioned the headaches at the beginning of Turn Coat, I thought for sure that was a sign of life for Lash, but between TC and Changes, the headaches apparently vanished. And still no Lash. So who knows? Maybe the headaches were something completely different.
Title: Re: Reviving my Major Lash theory post
Post by: Serack on July 08, 2011, 11:48:13 AM
Quote
Serack
My take:  When Lash rebelled against her originator, the bit of lasciel's energy that was giving Harry access to hellfire was either destroyed of fundamentally changed to the point where it was no longer the same thing...  I.E. Soulfire and Hellfire are 2 sides of the same coin and that coin had now flipped.  So yah he wouldn't have access to hell fire any more (He didn't obviously) and instead he had access to soulfire, he just didn't know it/didn't know how to access it.


The problem I have with this statement is that you are essentially suggesting that a mere imprint of a time immortal being was able to give Harry access to Soulfire.  The reason I think that Lash allowed Harry the use of Hellfire is because that is the nature of the Denarians.  They offer power, and Lasciel herself is known as The Temptress.  If that is her nature, then offering a small sampling of power in exchange for binding his soul is well within her nature, thus the imprint is allowed to give access to Hellfire.

Harry gave Lash, a mere shadow free will, to go against her creator, but to say that the mere shadow that was Lash gave Harry access to Soulfire, and allowed him to use it after she was no longer present within him as far as we know, I find that to be an extreme stretch.

Furthermore, in Turn Coat, Uriel himself converses with Harry, informing him of the good side actually doing something, just not in a noticeable way at first, then Mab appears and gives us a little backstory regarding Uriel.  If Lash gave Harry the ability to use Soulfire, then you are essentially saying that Jim Butcher himself planted Uriel, a freaking Archangel, in the series as a red herring.  Possible? Yes.  But I disagree.

The question I most want to ask Jim is:  Can any mortal pratictioner use Soulfire, or does mortal access to soulfire/helfire require "angelic" sponsorship?  Does this sponsorship require active investment from the sponsor?

I'm guessing that Hellfire, having a powersource outside the mortal, requires active sponsorship, but that soulfire, once granted, sources it's power from the mortal's own soul and thus once the mortal has access (in this case/theory without knowing about it or using it) it doesn't have to be maintained.  

Bob uses very similar language to describe how Harry had access to Hellfire from a bit of energy from Lasciel, and how Lash subsisted from a bit of energy from Lasciel.  When Lash rebelled against that energy, a fundamental paradigm shift occured for her, and part of this was that she flipped the coil over from helfire to Soulfire.  If my assessment of the requirements for Soulfire as listed above is accurate (I.E. no requirement for active sponsorship since the power source is the mortal's own soul), then the echoes of this paradigm shift are still enough for Harry to have had access to it, even without Lash still actively sponsoring it.

If Soulfire does require active sponsorship, then it had to have come from Uriel, and he has to still be actively "sponsoring" Harry.  If not, then the source of the ability is just as likely to come from Lash as from Uriel.

Edit: slightly reworded the "question
Title: Re: Reviving my Major Lash theory post
Post by: AcornArmy on July 08, 2011, 12:02:43 PM
The question I most want to ask Jim is:  Does mortal access to soulfire/helfire require "angelic" sponsorship?  Does this sponsorship require active investment from the sponsor?

I think the most likely answer to this question has to be no. Harry's Hellfire was sponsored, but it didn't use any of his soul when he cast it. And the sum total of the sponsorship appeared to be the ability to use the Fallen's Hellfire for his spells.

With the Soulfire, Harry is burning up his own soul. He's mentioned reaching into the place in his mind where Soulfire resides when he casts it. If Uriel is involved, he doesn't seem to be doing much. Maybe Uriel gave him the initial access, but after that, it seems to be all Harry. This appearance could be misleading, though, I guess.
Title: Re: Reviving my Major Lash theory post
Post by: Serack on July 08, 2011, 12:14:50 PM
Slightly reworded the question

Quote
Can any mortal pratictioner use Soulfire, or does mortal access to soulfire/helfire require "angelic" sponsorship?  Does this sponsorship require active investment from the sponsor?
Title: Re: Reviving my Major Lash theory post
Post by: Crawker on July 08, 2011, 12:23:59 PM
Slightly reworded the question

I'm pretty sure that the second part of that question would get the answer "I'm not gonna tell you!" in a singsong voice. Because if the sponsorship required active investment each time Harry used soulfire it may either confirm Uriel helping Harry on a regular basis, or Lash still being around in some form.

But I bet at the very least a mortal needs to be nudged in the right direction by an angelic being, at least the first time.

After all, isn't the whole point of soulfire, making the user more of who they are meant to be (achieving their full potential in terms of not just power, but also in terms of their character)? If everyone could use it, there would be a lot fewer problems in the world. Harry was a good person before, but he couldn't always use it. And he's made morally grey decisions since and still has the soulfire going strong. So I'd assume it needs to be activated by an angelic being, rather than by being good.
Same goes for hellfire, considering the bonuses it gives to spells, wouldn't every evil guy with a hint of magical talent be using it if you could just get it by being naughty?
Title: Re: Reviving my Major Lash theory post
Post by: Black Dane on July 08, 2011, 02:02:21 PM
As stated, we know from WoJ that Lasciel is coming back, and she is going to be major league pissed off (the whole woman scorned thing).  IMO, her story has the potential to make Nick’s efforts look like those of just some ordinary school yard bully.

Harry may not have only changed Lash, but in doing so permanently ripped away a part of Lasciel.  We don’t know just how significant the Shadow is to the whole of a Denarian, but my thought is that a major part of the original goes into the creation of a Shadow.  My rationale for this is the connection to hell fire, and the strength needed to provide/maintain that connection.  Think about the pain experience when something is called soul wrenching.  For humans, it’s emotionally painful.  Now imagine the impact on an entity of nothing but soul.  The effect could be both physical and emotional, and incredibly amplified.

I’d love to see not only Lasciel return for revenge, but also to have been driven so insane by Harrys’ actions (the whole unintended consequences thing) that even Nick wants her stopped.  If Lash returns, it probably will not be until the BAT, but I could see Lasciel showing up a book or two before, and setting the whole thing off.
Title: Re: Reviving my Major Lash theory post
Post by: contraducktory on July 08, 2011, 02:30:05 PM
In support of this theory.

The only way for Lash to be gone, is for her to be 'absorbed' when the coin is taken up.

So, what if the damage to his brain, didn't get rid of Lash, but just made her inaccessible.  She'd still be there, and possibly be able to act/influence, but not able to directly interact as she did before.  So Lash is still in Harry's head, and when he's 'healed', or maybe was healed by Mab, Lash could return.  That would leave Lasciel still in the coin, and able to claim a victim.  While Lash is able to help Harry.
Title: Re: Reviving my Major Lash theory post
Post by: the neurovore of Zur-En-Aargh on July 08, 2011, 03:52:22 PM
The only way for Lash to be gone, is for her to be 'absorbed' when the coin is taken up.

Why do we think that's the only way ?

It being the only way anyone who has talked to Harry about know about is one thing, but we know the Denarians regularly trash information about themselves.
Title: Re: Reviving my Major Lash theory post
Post by: Brayt on July 08, 2011, 04:15:00 PM
Just a thought,

What if the part of harry's soul that is used up is actually taken by lash for two reasons;
1) she actually has been removed from his brain and knew this would happen when she protected him and (bc of newfound free will) was un willing to die. So she took the soul to use to manifest later as a teacher slash guide in later books IE GS

2) part of harry's soul had been tainted by temptation and in order to totally protect him she not only chose to remove herself from brain but also the damage to soul. This is a win win win. Harry can use soulfire instead of hellfire without taint, lash can exist as a seperate entity and JB doesn't have to worry about things getting too easy for harry with a fully cooperative lash in his mind.

Note: be gentle, I can't spell nor have I read all of the posts here so if I have stepped on any toes or repeated someone elses work or ideas I am sorry and it was not intentional
Title: Re: Reviving my Major Lash theory post
Post by: kazimmoinuddin on July 09, 2011, 01:56:24 AM
dresden been exposed to a lot of dark mojo, i wonder if lash fed on this, or perhaps took it with her.
Title: Re: Reviving my Major Lash theory post
Post by: tinygargoyle on July 12, 2011, 01:08:24 AM
Why is there all this talk of Lash coming back?
It would be a perfect fit to just hide away untill Lasciel's new host comes up to sic on Harry and they sense each other.
Title: Re: Reviving my Major Lash theory post
Post by: hassman on July 12, 2011, 02:12:07 AM
Furthermore, in Turn Coat, Uriel himself converses with Harry, informing him of the good side actually doing something, just not in a noticeable way at first, then Mab appears and gives us a little backstory regarding Uriel.  If Lash gave Harry the ability to use Soulfire, then you are essentially saying that Jim Butcher himself planted Uriel, a freaking Archangel, in the series as a red herring.  Possible? Yes.  But I disagree.

I have argued the counter to this before.  Uriel has not directly supported Harry (that would be cheating), however, he can supply power to proto angel Lash, who still resides within Harry, thus Harry has access to SF.  Uriel is not a red herring, but he is not acting in nearly as straight forward a manner as is thought.  (this also fits into JB is evil and wants to confuse the reader theory)
Title: Re: Reviving my Major Lash theory post
Post by: Sm0kEyNy on July 12, 2011, 02:36:07 AM
ignore me im jus markin this to peruse at my leasure
Title: Re: Reviving my Major Lash theory post
Post by: Silkki on July 12, 2011, 11:08:36 AM
Harry will clearly recieve a fixed up body when he respawns. This naturally means any nasty brain damage will vanish and Lash will be born again!

Words Revive and Lash in topic made me post this : )
Title: Re: Reviving my Major Lash theory post
Post by: Sm0kEyNy on July 12, 2011, 07:20:50 PM
Second Derivative Theory:
Uriel didn't give Harry Soulfire
It is my theory that if my above "Foundation Theory, and First Derivative Theory are true, then when Uriel “jostled Harry’s elbow”xrt#3 he did not invest part of his own energy into Harry to give him access, but rather nudged Harry into pulling the trigger on the Soulfire gun that was already in his hand, and made available to him through his latent connection with Lash who had already used Soulfire.  This would make Uriel’s “favor” a truly small one, and reinforces the Foundational Theory.  (props to LML for the trigger/gun analogy)


My only problem with this is the construct it self it seems very clear that harry has NO CLUE how this was done or how to duplicate it. so even if your right about harry acces to soulfire not being the gift from uriel that people think it is. This does also fit in with your theory tho.
Sort of a by the way you haver soulfire here let me show you how it works real quick an when u get the hang of it you too can do stuff like THIS!
Title: Re: Reviving my Major Lash theory post
Post by: Dot on July 12, 2011, 11:29:31 PM
Second Derivative Theory:
Uriel didn't give Harry Soulfire
It is my theory that if my above "Foundation Theory, and First Derivative Theory are true, then when Uriel “jostled Harry’s elbow”xrt#3 he did not invest part of his own energy into Harry to give him access, but rather nudged Harry into pulling the trigger on the Soulfire gun that was already in his hand, and made available to him through his latent connection with Lash who had already used Soulfire.  This would make Uriel’s “favor” a truly small one, and reinforces the Foundational Theory.  (props to LML for the trigger/gun analogy)

Lash might have used some of it to help Harry out in defiance of her coin's purpose, but I think Harry first tapped soulfire, somehow, way back in book 2.   I was rereading Fool Moon a while back, and this passage jumped out at me:
Quote
Somewhere, in all of that, I touched on something that wasn’t tapped out, in spite of how horrible the past days had been, something that hadn’t gone cold and numb inside of me. I grasped it, held it in my hand like a firefly, and willed its energy out, into the circle I had created with the spinning amulet on the end of its chain. It began to glow, azure-blue like a candle flame.  The light spread down the chain and to the amulet, and when it reached it the light became incandescent, the pentacle a brilliant light at the end of the chain..."  Kindle location 4354

It isn't the amulet itself that is glowing blue at first - it is the energy that Harry summons from inside himself.   And the blue light amplified the power he was pumping into the amulet already.  That seems like a soulfire boost to me.  I don't know how angelic beings figure into it at this point.  But Harry guesses later that the Black Council was behind the wolf belts - perhaps they were "cheating" in doing so, which in turn allowed for somebody to give Harry a little boost.

Edit to add: Related to the thought about cheating, when Harry soulgazed Denton, he saw the agent's formerly orderly self coated in "a thick, sticky black sludge that smells like swamps and things that attract dun-colored flies" (Kindle location 3955).   At this point in the series, that makes me think of the Formor.  And they seem to be bad guys, or at least have bad things in mind for Chicago magic users.   
Title: Re: Reviving my Major Lash theory post
Post by: sociotard on July 13, 2011, 02:59:50 AM
Quote
"If it's no big deal," I said, "then why is it so interesting?"
"Oh, well," Bob said.  "It is energy, you know.  And I wonder if maybe...maybe...well, look, Harry.  There was a tiny bit of Lasciel's energy in you, supporting the entity, giving you access to hellfire.  That's gone now, but the entity had to have had some kind of power source to turn against the essence of its own originator."
"So it was running off my soul?  Like I'm some kind of battery?"
“Hey,” Bob said, “don’t get all righteous.  You gave it to her.  Encouraging her to make her own choices, to rebel, to exercise free will.”  Bob shook his head.  Free will is horrible, Harry, believe me.  I’m glad I don’t have it.  Ugh, no, thank you.  But you gave her some.  You gave her a name.  The will came with it.”
Now I'm going to wonder if Dresden will give Bob a little unwelcome gift later on.
Title: Re: Reviving my Major Lash theory post
Post by: Datakim on July 13, 2011, 04:21:26 AM
Now I'm going to wonder if Dresden will give Bob a little unwelcome gift later on.

Should bob not already have free will then to some extent atleast? Afterall, Harry gave Bob a name too. If Harry giving Lash her name gave her free will, then why is the same not true for Bob. For that matter, it is kinda strange that this was not brought up in the dialog you quoted such as Harry mentioning to Bob that when it comes to names, his situation is rather similar to Lash.

Maybe Bob does not really THINK of himself as Bob, even if he responds to that name, but Lash did at the end. Or something like that? Maybe Bob would have to somehow embrace the name and the identity/free will that comes with it, and thats what happened with Lash at the end.
Title: Re: Reviving my Major Lash theory post
Post by: Tanstar on July 13, 2011, 04:29:57 AM
Harry was a good person before, but he couldn't always use it. And he's made morally grey decisions since and still has the soulfire going strong. So I'd assume it needs to be activated by an angelic being, rather than by being good.

Perhaps turning (even just a photocopy of) a fallen angel back toward the light is a bigger deal and made him worthy of soulfire.  This would make Lash instrumental to Harry being able to use soulfire, but it wouldn't be a gift, but something he'd earned.  I like this concept.
Title: Re: Reviving my Major Lash theory post
Post by: Serack on September 07, 2012, 01:08:03 PM
This being my favorite theory that I have put the most effort into developing, supporting, and formatting... but at the same time not getting any new material since pretty much 2010, I wanted to post an update post with some of the newer theorizing, along with relevant WoJ's that I've discovered since it was last updated.

I'll start with the new relevant WoJ's.  They are hidden in spoiler code not because they are spoilers but because I find it a handy dandy way to colapse them so that you can view the post with them, or without them.

(click to show/hide)

Some time over the past year or so I saw a seperate theory that I can't remember the source of that was similar to the "Second Derivative Theory:"  in my origional post but took it a little farther due to theories that Lash was the Parasite.  In this interpretation of things, what Uriel actually invested his power into wasn't directly Harry but rather into the vestages of Lash, thus jump starting her and allowing her to reconstitute.  This fits well with the idea that Harry was getting soulfire from Lash rather than Uriel.  It also helps answer questions about how she was able to come back to help keep his meat shell alive in GS if she is in fact the parasite.

This fits well with Uriel answer to Harry about Heaven not responding to Lucifer taking action and investing power on the mortal plane twice when Uriel said that maybe a different arcangel invested his power less overtly and was "Thinking long-term," and close examination of the dialogue between Harry and Uriel in GS shows that Harry is convinced Uriel gave him soulfire, but Uriel doesn't confirm it at all.

Quote from: Changes Ch 29
Uriel's expression darkened for a moment.  "And I am telling you that I am very limited in terms of what I can do to help you," he said.  "Limited, in fact, to what I have already done."
"Yeah," I said.  "Soulfire.  Just about killed myself with that one.  Thanks."
"No one is making you use it.  Dresden.  It's your choice."

Interestingly enough, with what we know from GS, this conversation happened after the 7 word wisper, but before the response 7 word wisper at the end of GS.  I am starting to think that at this point Uriel had yet again invested power into Lash to allow her to communicate those 7 words to Harry, this being something he had "already done."  This idea also implies to me that Lash and Uriel have had some communication.
Title: Re: Reviving my Major Lash theory post
Post by: Serack on November 01, 2012, 07:52:02 PM
Here is an excellent writeup of some of my earlier points in my last post, that also comes to some awesome new conclusions.

Allow me to elaborate on the Lash gives Harry Soulfire theory.

We know Uriel likes to kill two birds with one stone, so it is a fair assumption he always does so at every possible opportunity. I agree Uriel gave Harry soulfire. This raises the question, what other bird did Uriel kill? The answer to that is revealed by analzing how Uriel gave Harry soulfire.

From WoJ, we know Fallen Angels have access to Hellfire and Soulfire, and which they use depends upon their nature. Lash is at least related to Fallen Angels and could potentially retain the ability to use Hellfire/Soulfire. In WN, Harry gives Lash part of his soul, giving her enough free will to make a choice regarding her nature, specifically whether she will be a monster (Lasciel's puppet) or not - she chooses the latter and sacrifices her life. From WoJ, we know that Lash's choice closely parallels a later choice made by another. From WoJ we also know Lash's personality was influenced by Harry.  Thus, it makes sense that her choice would parallel one made later by Harry.

Fast forward to Changes/GS and we see Harry is presented with the same choice - whether he will become a monster (and Mab's puppet) or not and he chooses the latter, committing assisted suicide. In GS, we discover the result of Harry's choice - Uriel offers to send him on a soul-finding journey that eventually results in the return of his soul to his body so that he would have an opportunity to complete his redemption. Since Lash's choice in WN parallels Harry's choice in Changes/GS, we can infer the same thing happened off-scene to Lash. In other words, when she died, Uriel gave her an opportunity to complete her redemption.

The problem, however, is that Lash doesn't have a body and Uriel can't just return her to Harry's body, because that would be cheating. Enter SmF, where the Denarians cheat, giving Uriel a chance to balance the scales by giving Harry soulfire. Rather than giving Harry direct access to Soulfire (one bird) Uriel accomplishes this by restoring Lash to Harry's body, which allows Lash to give Harry Soulfire (two birds). Potentially, Uriel also foresaw that he would need Lash to help preserve Harry's free will in GS (three birds). In further support, we know Uriel likes to work through tools (see the Warrior - Harry is Uriel's tool). Thus, it seems likely Uriel used a tool (Lash) to give Harry Soulfire.

Finally, I'd like to carry this one step further. If Uriel used Lash as a tool to complete his cheat in SmF, it seems likely he also used Lash as a tool to compete his cheat in GS. Thus, I propose that Uriel did not whisper 7 words into Harry's ear; rather, he gave Lash the ability to speak (one bird) so that she could whisper 7 words into Harry's ear (two birds). As further evidence for this last proposition, note that the 7 words called Mab a liar, while WoJ confirms Mab is not a liar, she was simply wrong. That's not a mistake Uriel would make. However, Lash, as a creature with a soul, has more free will than Uriel and more human emotions and given that she faced a similar choice as Harry and seems attached to Harry, she is likely rather passionate about the issue of free will. In her passion, Lash might call Mab a liar rather than calling her wrong.
Title: Re: Reviving my Major Lash theory post
Post by: Serack on September 10, 2013, 05:40:44 PM
Archiving a 9/23/12 post here, along with an older post by someone else. -Serack

The Lash story line is my favorite, and the one that I have spent the most effort theorizing about.  To get some context for the theorizing I am going to make in this post you might want to read this theory post (http://www.jimbutcheronline.com/bb/index.php/topic,27090.0.html) I first cobbled together in 2010.  Once you have read the first post, I recommend you lead the last 2 posts, but I'll summarize the parts that I want to focus on below.

This is a long string of conjecture, but it goes something like this:

When Harry gained Soulfire in SmF, the conduit for this soulfire is actualy Lash not Uriel.  Maybe, when Uriel helped Harry along to using this conduit, he actually invested some energy into Lash to help her reconstitute and serve as this conduit which also serves the extra purpose of helping her recover.  Cozarkian calls this killing 2 birds with one stone which is certainly Uriel's style. 

Another, similar theory that Cozarkian and I have taken from this idea is that Uriel's 7 words were actually delivered by Lash, and Uriel worked out another 2fer from this by reconstituting Lashes ability to communicate with Harry in the bargain.

Now here are the new thoughts:

Quote from: Changes Ch 29
Uriel's expression darkened for a moment.  "And I am telling you that I am very limited in terms of what I can do to help you," he said.  "Limited, in fact, to what I have already done."
"Yeah," I said.  "Soulfire.  Just about killed myself with that one.  Thanks."
"No one is making you use it.  Dresden.  It's your choice."

Reading the line "Limited, in fact, to what I have already done."  after the big reveals of GS kind of irritated me like a small rock in my shoe because in GS we find out that this line took place after the evil "7 words" have been spoken, and it wasn't until much later that Harry heard the reciprical 7 words that ballanced out the Fallen's cheating. 

So here's the new thought.  In that Changes conversation, Uriel has already made a bargain with Lash to have her speak 7 words reassuring Harry that Mab can't change him, in exchange for her getting the ability to speak with him again.

Some extra thoughts:  Esentially Harry hears a fallen wisper to him "Die alone" at the end of Changes and gets 2 words in response "Hush now."  Examining this, I have to wonder if right now Lash is constrained to only speaking to counter Fallen messages in kind... 

Also, some have speculated (http://www.jimbutcheronline.com/bb/index.php/topic,33533.msg1538198.html#msg1538198) that Uriel has given hints to Harry that if he were to have another internal conversation with Id-Harry (someone Jim has said we will see again 2010 BBB Q&A) He will find Lash there.

Edit: quoting that link below for posterity
Time Traveling might tie into an exchange of places with Subconcious Harry.  And, it could involve phrase: no matter where you go... there you are.  That phrase is alluded by Uriel at the end of Ghost Story. It was originally told to him by Subconscious Harry in Fool Moon.  It could also simply be that Uriel wants Harry to meet Sub Harry again and his new partner-in-crime Lash.


Bob's Evil Genesis
« on: November 16, 2012, 11:26:32 AM »
I want to draw some parallels between Evil Bob and Lash.

First a WoJ:
Quote from: 2011 BBB WoJ
Lash was apparently able to gain free will from harry, a mortal. Can mortals potentially grant free will to other supernaturals like vampires and faries?”
That’s… a spectacularly complicated question, really.   :)
Lash didn’t gain free will, per se. Lash gained individuality, became a singular entity, self-motivated and distinct from the personality of Lasciel the Fallen. That personality was strongly influenced by Dresden, who believes very strongly in individual choice and responsibility, but doesn’t necessarily equate to free will in the sense of what mortals possess.
You might note that Lash essentially committed suicide with her “free will.” A choice which rather strongly resembles another choice a few books later in the series.

And a text excerpt:
Quote from: WN
"If it's no big deal," I said, "then why is it so interesting?"
"Oh, well," Bob said.  "It is energy, you know.  And I wonder if maybe...maybe...well, look, Harry.  There was a tiny bit of Lasciel's energy in you, supporting the entity, giving you access to hellfire.  That's gone now, but the entity had to have had some kind of power source to turn against the essence of its own originator."
"So it was running off my soul?  Like I'm some kind of battery?"
“Hey,” Bob said, “don’t get all righteous.  You gave it to her.  Encouraging her to make her own choices, to rebel, to exercise free will.”  Bob shook his head.  Free will is horrible, Harry, believe me.  I’m glad I don’t have it.  Ugh, no, thank you.  But you gave her some.  You gave her a name.  The will came with it.”

Soooo, the thing is, you could replace every instance of the word "Lash" with "Evil Bob" in the quote "Lash didn’t gain free will, per se. Lash gained individuality, became a singular entity, self-motivated and distinct from the personality of Lasciel the Fallen. That personality was strongly influenced by Dresden, who believes very strongly in individual choice and responsibility, but doesn’t necessarily equate to free will in the sense of what mortals possess."  And the statement would still work (adjusting for "Lasciel the Fallen" to become "Bob the Skull").

Conclusion:  Maybe when Evil Bob hit Harry with the Wammy in DB, he stole some Life essence, or "soul" like Lash kinda did in the WN quote, and used it to build his own self identity.

Wild conjecture:  If this is true, could it have been part of what triggered the Shadow's ability to manifest in that book?  (I don't buy into it, but I'm throwing it at the wall to see if it sticks anyways)