I had downloaded City Planning sheets which had been made into fillable Acrobat PDFs. IIRC it was from this forum, but I'm having trouble finding the original post.

Anyway, I had found (and resolved) one error in how the forms were created (the 'Relationships' field for two Faces was keyed to the same variable), and I wanted to track down the original poster to see if it had already been identified and remedied.

Can anyone remember where that was or who had created it?

The stuff that the wizard routinely carries is supposed to be represented by his Lore ability.

Well, yes, but imagine that a player took some game time to Declare Aspects and then didn't tag them until a spellcasting challenge some time later, would those Aspects have faded?

For instance, an in-game sojourn into Chinatown affords a player wizard an opportunity to acquire some special herbs (and a successful Resources roll complemented by Rapport allows him to Declare upon himself the Aspect "I Acquired Rare Magical Herbs in Chinatown"). Some time later, presumably after several conflicts have been played out, the wizard finds a narrative reason to bring in that Aspect during a Potion-making session.

Note, of course, that you only get one free tag on an aspect (after that you must spend Fate), and I believe that you can only tag an aspect once per 'event', so any aspects you use for the complexity can't also be used for the control roll(s).

Of course - only one free tag per Aspect.

So, what I think I'm concluding is that a ritualist could (with enough time) make additional Declarations which are meant to be tagged for the Control rolls portion of the ritual. For example: 8 Declarations were needed to meet the Lore requirement, but the ritualist opted to spend time/resources/skill checks to make another 5 Declarations on top of that: one for each of the 5 rounds they planned to be making Control checks.

Or (if time was a serious factor) the ritualist could spend Fate Points for a second tag on those Aspects already declared (and tagged) for the Lore check (which would be expensive and possibly foolish).

Is there any room for a little Meat Loaf?

"Objects in the Rear View Mirror May Appear Closer Than They Are"
Invoke: Your rough childhood taught gave you a broad base of experience and wisdom to draw upon in many situations.
Compel: The current situation touches on some childhood trauma - you are unable to be cool about it.

"I'd Do Anything for Love"
Invoke: Your commitment to love fills you with strength when the chips are down.
Compel: Your commitment to love obligates you to step up when the chips are down.

"I'd Lie for You (And That's the Truth)"
Invoke: Your lies are more effective when they are serving the best interests of someone you care about.
Compel: Someone you care about needs you to cover for them, at risk to your reputation.

"If It Ain't Broke, Break It"
Invoke: If you have to break a rule, you can break it good and hard.
Compel: You could let this go and play nice, but today just isn't that day.

"Inducted in the Armies of the Night"
Invoke: Your leather jacket, tough demeanor, and party attitude earn you some serious street cred in some circles.
Compel: There's a problem, and those chains and spikes on your leather jacket mean you better step up.

There is a one-time reference to "no-prep" thaumaturgy (YS278) in the discussion of focus items, where the rules explain that if a thaumaturgic ritual's Complexity is equal to or less than one's Lore ranking, it requires no additional preparation - the caster is assumed to have the materials. Would such a ritual be possible in combat (like Waldo scratchiung out that impromptu warding circle)?

As such (though it is clear from the character writeup that Molly Carpenter's veils are powered by a high Discipline and specialization, with extra shifts pumped in for duration), is it possible for a spellcaster to be throwing down impromptu ritual-strength Veils which last until the next sunrise?