McAnally's (The Community Pub) > Author Craft
Derivative Plots?
Shecky:
--- Quote from: neurovore on May 09, 2008, 03:10:40 PM ---Because it translates emotional reality directly into physical in ways that have no basis in our actual understanding of the universe.
--- End quote ---
I just don't see why that's a problem. There are many theories about consciousness that essentially require the possibility of mind affecting physical reality.
--- Quote from: neurovore on May 09, 2008, 03:10:40 PM ---If we have this argument, we'll just all draw our own lines in different places, and I do not think anything will be resolved. Since Damon Knight is no longer with us, we can't even call on him to come over and point at things for us.
--- End quote ---
Wasn't intended as an argument, merely an illustration of how fluid the lines are even within genres. SF is not so separate from other genres as we might believe.
--- Quote from: neurovore on May 09, 2008, 03:10:40 PM ---Agreed, to an extent; there is too much intentionally left blank - cf. the discussions elsewhere about the exact nature of God in the Dresdenverse - for it to really feel like an entirely SFnal world to me.
--- End quote ---
Very few SF works discuss everything. Much is left unexplained or even completely ignored - for example, Damon Knight's Why Do Birds leaves the majority of the SF-specific aspects entirely or minimally unexplained. Yet it's considered good SF.
It's just been my experience that little truly separates the genres; even hard SF, when well-written, is not so different from others - at its heart, a good story is still... well, a story. And for human readers, there's a certain set of shared-experience considerations that always enter into play.
Don't misunderstand me - I think that SF/fantasy are more freeing than are other genres. They put the human experience into unexpected and even new contexts, yet the human-experience aspect always shows through. They go beyond but bring it all back home to the human. And that's a good thing, in my opinion. :)
Quantus:
--- Quote from: Shecky on May 09, 2008, 03:45:37 PM ---I just don't see why that's a problem. There are many theories about consciousness that essentially require the possibility of mind affecting physical reality.
--- End quote ---
One of the few things that many philosophers can actually agree on is that the idea of emotional responses or some sort of non-physical (ie spiritual) part of the self affecting the physical realm in ways we don't understand is actually a necessary requirement of Free Will. the argument being that if there is not some immaterial x-factor, then the brain is just one big chemical reaction that has only one possible path of responses and outcomes based on the inputs exposed to it, and that our belief in our own choice is simple a delution of grandeur.
--- Quote ---
Very few SF works discuss everything. Much is left unexplained or even completely ignored - for example, Damon Knight's Why Do Birds leaves the majority of the SF-specific aspects entirely or minimally unexplained. Yet it's considered good SF.
It's just been my experience that little truly separates the genres; even hard SF, when well-written, is not so different from others - at its heart, a good story is still... well, a story. And for human readers, there's a certain set of shared-experience considerations that always enter into play.
Don't misunderstand me - I think that SF/fantasy are more freeing than are other genres. They put the human experience into unexpected and even new contexts, yet the human-experience aspect always shows through. They go beyond but bring it all back home to the human. And that's a good thing, in my opinion. :)
--- End quote ---
Thats what i thought. SF/Fantasy taken as a whole are definitely a separate thing from other fiction, because they live in the Why Not over the Why; in what could be possible, not what is. But within it, does it really change anything but flavor whether the super-strength was a result of gamma radiation and genetic manipulation or Troll blood and a magic ritual? And does the fact that the word "gamma radiation" appears in science books make its use any less Fantastic?
And it goes both ways. Some fantasy worlds are ordered and logical enough to have the feel of SF; dresden is a good example at times, so is the Young wizards series by Diane Duane. Similarly some SF definately cross into a more fantasy realm; Dune is a big one, so is Star Wars (no matter how many microscopic organisms are in my blood).
I guess I just think any hard division between the two are all going to be cosmetic, rather than effecting what kind of story-telling can be done.
the neurovore of Zur-En-Aargh:
--- Quote from: Quantus347 on May 09, 2008, 04:42:33 PM ---One of the few things that many philosophers can actually agree on is that the idea of emotional responses or some sort of non-physical (ie spiritual) part of the self affecting the physical realm in ways we don't understand is actually a necessary requirement of Free Will. the argument being that if there is not some immaterial x-factor, then the brain is just one big chemical reaction that has only one possible path of responses and outcomes based on the inputs exposed to it, and that our belief in our own choice is simple a delution of grandeur.
--- End quote ---
Personally, if I have a choice between intellectual rigour and believing in free will for the sake of believing in free will, intellectual rigour wins.
At some levels it's a spurious opposition, though; free will and determinism are not necessarily contradictory. The arguments there are too complex for me to do them justice in the time I have available; I recommend Daniel Dennett's Freedom Evolves.
--- Quote ---
And does the fact that the word "gamma radiation" appears in science books make its use any less Fantastic?
--- End quote ---
If it's used as magic handwaving, it's fantasy. If it's used as a part of the world in much the same way as heat and light and gravity and the bits of reality that are intuitively obvious to us because they're the ones that have always been directly palpable to us are, it's SF. My degrees are in genetics, so I don't default read "mutation" as magic password to superpowers, I read it as a very specific phenomenon that works in ways as understandable as going down to the shop for a loaf of bread.
--- Quote ---I guess I just think any hard division between the two are all going to be cosmetic, rather than effecting what kind of story-telling can be done.
--- End quote ---
There's more than one borderland, IMO, and as an aspiring author I am interested in how things work differently, what makes something feel SF or fantasy and where the edges are. Magic with strict scientific rules, on one hand, and a world with underlying rational workings inhabited by people who think of them as magic, on the other, are very different things, but they're both edge cases between SF and fantasy.
the neurovore of Zur-En-Aargh:
--- Quote from: Shecky on May 09, 2008, 03:45:37 PM ---I just don't see why that's a problem. There are many theories about consciousness that essentially require the possibility of mind affecting physical reality.
--- End quote ---
Insofar as sentience as software has to run on something, yes. [ Though to loop back to the start of the thread for a moment, Permutation City does a lovely deconstruction of even that notion. ] But there is a difference of scale between that and magical thinking.
The Corvidian:
All the good stories are remade every so often. That's how come stories of King Arthur are still told today.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version