Bad Alias 1. I think we are in agreement (to a point) then. If it isn't a misdirect, the line then should be taken as a hint.
2. I agree with you there. Some of that work was done in this book, some questions answered and reasons alluded to why Harry doesn't follow some of these mysteries and clues (which one thinks as a detective would be like an itch he can't scratch). More in-text explanations of why Harry isn't scratching these itches would be good, as you say. But it was good that Harry found out some information (clearly not all, that was hinted at strongly) about the starborn thing and about the Cycle. The explanation Jim seems to allude to (at least in my opinion) is that Harry is otherwise too caught up in the moment to follow these things up, but doesn't just miss them or forget them altogether.
Humans are probably the most malleable creatures in the DF. I'd say it's that they don't understand (some) human motivations. It's kind of like Harry says about demons in GP. The demons understand lust, greed, anger, etc. They don't understand "good" emotions, so they don't know how to appeal to our "better angels."
Yes, I phrased my position rather poorly. Angels also seem to have trouble understanding human choices as well, though. I think it is because mortals can Choose, and because the others (by and large), cannot. Which makes mortals contradictory, because on the one hand they can be what they Choose to be but on the other hand what they Choose to be shapes them in to being who they are. What I was trying to get at (and failed to adequately articulate...and perhaps still am) is that it's the contradiction that confuses the supernatural types. It goes way back to what He Who Walks Behind Said when he and Harry first met (that we know of).
Yeah it wouldn't surprise me if Bob was even older than he himself thought. But it's clear he isn't that old either; the really old beings are also really knowledgeable and strong (and Bob isn't particularly strong or knowledgeable by comparison).
1. Only if the Council were aware of his meddling. He might have maintained a perfectly agreeable facade in public in order not to arouse suspicion. He might have been on rather good terms with the Council until he revealed himself (whenever that was).
2. I forget where but it seems that I can't find it right now. Although the timeline suggests it's less...
3. I agree. But whether she witnessed the acts or merely heard about them is another thing. I guess it's open to interpretation but it hardly felt like she crossed him.
4. Well, there's always that. But once you get into those murky waters I think it's pretty hard to define what "happened" at all. I think that would tend to hint that McCoy interfered with the spirit which makes my theory more likely.
Second Aristh If anything, the blasting rod or wand is more for evocation. Harry often describes it more like a multi-tool to serve multiple purposes. Yeah...but he didn't write it when he was born or a novice either. It's not like he would have even written a book until he was at least somewhat of an expert, which would take a while. Per WOJ, while he was young he was running around being more violent that Harry! I doubt he was sitting around writing books too. By the time he would have got around to writing the book, he would have been quite a bit older than Harry. Considered a master, if you like. Otherwise why would any of them read it? They would have more than enough information from literally thousands of years of experimentation and gathering of knowledge. So it's shrinks the amount of time considerably when he could have written it, by which time most of the Council at the point Harry makes the comment would have passed their beginner phase.
If you really believe it's a throwaway line, up to you. But so far you haven't provided any evidence to the contrary and this thread is for speculation. Read the books how you like, but some of us enjoy putting the puzzle together and finding the clues.