The Dresden Files > DF Spoilers
Walker enslaving a Denarian, other ideas
groinkick:
--- Quote from: Wizard Sibelis on July 07, 2018, 08:01:56 PM ---my presumption isn't silent though
--- End quote ---
Sorry, I don't see it that way.
--- Quote from: Wizard Sibelis on July 07, 2018, 08:01:56 PM ---*oh and 4 horsemen plus a judge equals five points... five points of creation, five stars on Lady Nights neck, ect.
--- End quote ---
Like this... 4 horsemen don't have to be connected in the slightest to 5 points. It's just a wag with faulty connections painted as evidence. I don't care about WAG's. I make them all the time. Just don't accuse me or others of making assumptions while the evidence you're pointing out is created by you, and not actual evidence like a WOJ or clearly laid out in the book as factual.
Wizard Sibelis:
--- Quote from: groinkick on July 07, 2018, 08:05:33 PM ---Sorry, I don't see it that way.
--- End quote ---
See, when I admit it (and you don't), its' not silent. when you stubbornly back your own because you disagree with my conclusion but cannot argue my actual points... it's silent indeed, thanks.
Wizard Sibelis:
I mean the fact Death has Hell/Hades following after and Denton interpreting Harry's souls as Death with hwwbh being Hell/Hades following after kinda says all I need to prove this particular idea as valid I think anyway.
groinkick:
--- Quote from: Wizard Sibelis on July 07, 2018, 08:08:13 PM ---See, when I admit it (and you don't), its' not silent. when you stubbornly back your own because you disagree with my conclusion but cannot argue my actual points... it's silent indeed, thanks.
--- End quote ---
Do I not admit that my idea's are WAG's? The very definition of a Wild ass guess is that it's opinion, an idea. I'm not claiming it as factual.
Wizard Sibelis:
--- Quote from: groinkick on July 07, 2018, 08:13:42 PM ---Do I not admit that my idea's are WAG's? The very definition of a Wild ass guess is that it's opinion, an idea. I'm not claiming it as factual.
--- End quote ---
I'm not talking about those... i'm talking about the things that are widely accepted by numerous people which are based almost entirely upon a logical leap somewhere. Even if it's a VERY logical leap to make, like three beer bottles and He Who Walks Beside. It makes a lot of sense, so much so that some don't question it at all if I make a theory about beside or between or betwixt. but point out one thing like those who walk before in the plural and hwwbh in the singular and because it is not the accepted norm it is immediately questioned.(as iirc, it was here by you most recently) There is a disconnect there from accepted theory and nonstandard.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version