The Dresden Files > DF Spoilers
Transcript for 2018 Jim Butcher Tyson's Corner signing
Mr. Death:
Yes, you fanatically believe your own WAG. We're all already aware of this.
That doesn't make it true. That also doesn't mean everybody wants to hear about it constantly. Discussion in the last couple threads you tried to cram it into suggests the opposite, in fact.
raidem:
Of course it doesn't make it true.
I never said it does. It is a WAG and I apply it. So that I can explore the theory.
I don't just say Mab=Murphy without having some tie in into the discussion, or some tangential link. Actually, Thank you for noticing. I have a Psychiatric condition where my speech is tangential. It is how I think. And my neurologist said I have a brain type where some would go on to cure cancer. A type of brain that has to ask why where other people just goes on and accepts something. My diagnosis so far dissociative disorder, bipolar disorder w/psychosis. So I appreciate the fact that you have recognized some traits of creativity (or at least bipolar disorder) in motion. OCD was also diagnosed at one time, so my obsession with Mab=Murphy is most likely part of it too. But more broadly, I have obsessions with DF, computer games, news, and exercise but each at different times. It takes different turns usually. I have a spell where I just play computer games. Then mainly read DF or I am on this Forum. Then, times where I just basically watch CNN. And now, I'm going to the gym, swimming but I'm on the Forum too.
I also have to take many medications to simply remain functional.
Actually, reading through my recent posts where I put forward WOJ's, etc that can be construed as being supportive of Mab=Murphy, I think you don't want to see more evidence in case Murphy ends up being Mab. So, you can be surprised and say oh there is this evidence via WOJ or text that supported it. And somebody already pointed it out.
raidem:
And before you go on and Argue I place Mab=Murphy in 'every' thread, let me see the threads I haven't even touched w/ Mab=Murphy.
Topics:
Is Michael more than he appears? (Read 93 times)
What's Odin's stake in things?
Could the Blackstaff Cure a Warlock of Corruption?
Walker enslaving a Denarian, other ideas
Who is the guy with an English accent in the cell at Demonreach?
Harry's next power up
Gateway to hell....
Saw this pic/quote and it reminded me of Harry
Jim in VA 6-28-18
Newly Posted Q&A
Are there more wizards like Elaine?
Think Eb's last name was random?
Sudden wild theory
Could Saint Patrick still be running around?
Mac as a extraDF character
We have a problem.
Mouse, Maggie, Cold Days
Summoning Molly
Monster LLC: Goodman Grey a Venator?
The 5 gods of Lovecraft
Magical Resilience to Medical Malady
Assuming Nicodemus got the Coin out.....
Was Nemesis in Storm Front?
Fistful of Warlocks -- Law Notes
I don’t think Justin was Kemmler
Are the Old Ones also locked out?
Black Cat Investigator
Zoo Day spoilers
Jim Q and A in VA 6-9-18
Jim Butcher Lexington, KY 6-7-18
SPOILERS: Book 18 title announced at Lexington book signing
Jim Q and A Okemos, MI 6-10-18
Anyone else really enjoy Maggie's perspective in Zoo Day?
Best question answer at the Virginia book signing
Jim Butcher @ Book People, Austin, Tx
So, when I'm on 35/44 has absolutely no mention of Mab=Murphy. That is 80% of the threads of the first page, no mention. And in those threads most are very brief. Only in a few does it go into more detail. And, I often go into hibernation where I don't generate much at all on the Forum.
On page 2, between 5-6 threads had Mab=Murphy stated in some way out of 50 threads for a 10-12% mention rate.
Mr. Death:
I said "every possible thread."
Referring to every thread about Murphy, not every single thread anyone has ever posted. That should have been obvious.
What are the titles of the nine threads just on the front page that you've pushed the theory in, out of curiosity?
--- Quote ---Actually, reading through my recent posts where I put forward WOJ's, etc that can be construed as being supportive of Mab=Murphy, I think you don't want to see more evidence in case Murphy ends up being Mab. So, you can be surprised and say oh there is this evidence via WOJ or text that supported it. And somebody already pointed it out.
--- End quote ---
I have absolutely no interest in Mab being Murphy. That's kind of the whole issue here. When I see a theory that I can believe, I say so in the thread and offer my own support. I don't try to discredit it so I can, what, "take credit" later? I'm really not that childish.
You have a WAG and you bring it up often enough that people are annoyed with it. That's really the start and end of the whole issue.
raidem:
No. Every possible thread is all threads. I mean, if I was being a dick I could mention Mab=Murphy in everything. So, that means I'm not being a dick. I understand though it is annoying some so I'll try to not mention Mab=Murphy and instead just state things without mentioning it. I'll allow the circumstantial evidence to speak for itself.
--- Quote ---What are the titles of the nine threads just on the front page that you've pushed the theory in, out of curiosity?
--- End quote ---
Transcript for 2018 Jim Butcher Tyson's Corner signing
WAG.... Murphy has moved on
Juxtaposition, Who fixed LC?
MOVED: Mab/Murphy Ironies
Dresden and Mab's Future
Zoo Day Spoilers Are the gods watching over Dresden?
Fist full of Warlocks spoilers Possible clue about Cowl?
Murphy Mantle Madness
I'm missing one on first look I think, but one was just a vague reference not exactly out right Mab=Murphy statement. And one of the threads, I had unlocked so I could move it to the reference collection as it contained much of the circumstantial evidence that could be used as foreshadowing, coincidence, and/or irony.
And 5 of the 8 listed topics on the first page was created by me. So, if you are wanting to avoid my Mab=Murphy theories simply stay away from my threads. You will reduce your exposure to my theory, speculation on it, and the circumstantial evidence supported by me by more than half. And it is likely even more than that since my threads are likely to contain much more Mab=Murphy references than just vague references or slight mentions.
And on the 2nd page, 2 of the 5 threads that has a mention somewhere in the thread are again created by me. And you can nearly halve exposure to even a passing reference to the theory by again avoiding my threads.
Snoopy, Loup Garou, and Mouse
Started by raidem « 1 2 3 4 »
Is Mac God?
Started by raidem « 1 2 3 4 »
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version