The Dresden Files > DF Spoilers
Murhpy is a doll
raidem:
Is there a fairy type with a button nose. I'm thinking about that fairy 'dormant gene group' now.
groinkick:
Are we being trolled by topic starter because of our "out there" theories or is this for real? lol I think we may be being made fun of.
raidem:
Hey, regardless of the purpose in their attempt, I'm keeping an eye out for fairies with a button nose now. Maybe that is an part of the dormant fairy gene group that lies on her genetic line. And now I'm trolling the troll with more speculation about my theories :) People should no better than to give me useful fodder like that.
Has any of the fairies been described with a button nose?
Alright, I'm going to take the 'button nose' as extremely slight evidence Murphy has distant changeling roots :)
peregrine:
--- Quote from: groinkick on January 19, 2018, 06:54:31 PM ---Are we being trolled by topic starter because of our "out there" theories or is this for real? lol I think we may be being made fun of.
--- End quote ---
It's less just out there theories, and more "I've got a theory, now that we have declared this theory to be correct, how can we make the evidence support it?" Even if there is no actual evidence to suggest said theory in the first place.
raidem:
--- Quote ---Even if there is no actual evidence to suggest said theory in the first place.
--- End quote ---
That is an arrogant approach. I mean both Ms. Duck and I have laid out much evidence to support our theories. You simply dismiss it as none. It's quite easy to do, no work involved at all to make that declaration.
There are others here who have admitted my theories have evidence to support it, but still remain unswayed and that is fine. But to say it has no evidence, it's a lazy approach that needs no or quite little effort to make.
It's the same way with WOJ. I recall a WOJ, I mention it in passing. Another person says no such WOJ exists. So they say the responsibility lies with me to find it. I find it and post it. They now admit it exists. It makes them a lazy passive participant if they do this repeatedly. They are the same individuals that don't come up with theories themselves. They tend only to cast aspersion on others theories. It's quite easy to do. They are passive, lazy waiting for someone else to push into the unknown before they walk that way with the light finally lit. So at least be grateful that there are some on the forum that give us something to think and talk about during this long downtime.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version