The Dresden Files > DF Spoilers

Drakul Theory

(1/5) > >>

jamescagney22:
So I saw this thread in the Dresden Files Reddit about the nature of Drakul and I have my own theory that has its origin in Grave Peril. In that book Michael calls Mavra "blood of the Dragon that old Serpent." Now Drakul was known as the dragon, as for the serpent, well in the bible there was a serpent who tricked Eve into eating the apple, and contrary to popular belief the serpent was not Lucifer, and as Drakul is trapped in human form it seems logical what his punishment is if you take it as a metaphor. Be a curse to humans and being hunted by them in turn seems to fit and it ties vampires in the demonic hierarchy as well.

kazimmoinuddin:
Is mavra the sort to take power for her self, or ensure the rise of her own court? I am leaning to her wanting to be large and Incharge, using her efforts to empower herself.

DonBugen:
Pretty sure that WON is that the serpent is Crowley, An Angel who did not so much Fall as Saunter Vaguely Downwards.

Wait, which book series were we talking about again?

Anyways, that connection is one that I never made before. But of course, Michael referring to "that old serpent" is of course a reference to King James version Revelation 12:9. You might be onto something.

Snark Knight:
As far as Michael is concerned, it's quite possible that ALL monsters are 'blood of the dragon'.

jonas:

--- Quote from: Snark Knight on August 30, 2017, 02:30:07 AM ---As far as Michael is concerned, it's quite possible that ALL monsters are 'blood of the dragon'.

--- End quote ---
Narm? Now this is why I always connect it to Lucifer himself, he mentions Dragon and serpent in the same breath. A wingless dragon is what? A fallen angel looses what?

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

Go to full version