The Dresden Files > DF Spoilers
Which absent villian will appear in Peace Talks?
Kindler:
--- Quote from: Mr. Death on October 03, 2017, 02:09:46 PM ---I think in Bombshells it's mentioned that they supplied the gas.
--- End quote ---
Ahhh. Okay, thanks. I'll take your word for it.
I'll be over here grumbling about my lack of Dresden because of my own stubbornness. :)
dspringer1:
The formor have not been waging war in the accords sense. They have not made war with any major supernatural race. The formor have been very aggressively moving to grab mortals with supernatural powers (who do not have status under the accords), although that has put them in some conflict with the White Council which has some protective impulses over the lesser human magic types.
In the process, they have been riling the other supernatural powers.
* They have clearly been pressing against White Council interests in Europe and North America.
* It is implied that other supernatural powers are being pressed as well, especially those who want to take territory in the former Red Court lands. Not at the level of a war, but certainly at the level where "border incidents" and "diplomatic incidents" and "regrettable deaths of not quite formal allies" occurs
* They have been unusually public in their pursuit, raising worries that normal humans will become aware of supernatural events
* They have seriously offended the Svartelves (aka - as seen in Bombshells). And the svartelves were worried about the Formor actions before these events occurred - which was why the agreement with the Formor was originally planned.
* They clearly care little for the accords
* Winter is clearly seeing them as a threat and working to contain that threat (also seen in bombshells)
RobReece:
Well, we know that Mab is going to be looking to take them down a notch, they were attempting to violate her Accords with their backstabbing actions in 'Bombshells'.
dspringer1:
--- Quote ---Well, we know that Mab is going to be looking to take them down a notch, they were attempting to violate her Accords with their backstabbing actions in 'Bombshells'.
--- End quote ---
I think you are misreading the situation. Mab is going to take down the Formor because she believes they are working with the Outsiders. However, Mab is constrained in her actions. If she can get the formor to actually violate the accords, then she can directly act against them. Right now she is limited to indirect action like that of Leah in Bombshells.
Do not get me wrong. Mab will defend the accords in any case. All I am saying is that Mab had very good reasons to take down the Formor well before any accord violation takes place. She is actively looking for an excuse to act.
Vorrobblev:
Cronos, he has pent the last 3 years torturing us.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version