The Dresden Files > DF Spoilers
The most frightening Denarian yet?
jonas:
*she can't just suddenly ignore her own logical nature that knows She'll get drug to oblivion> that's the point your missing in your reply. it doesn't matter if she wants to kill the fox, she knows the fox won't let her so she won't try. Original supposition was That she would consume everything by going to far. I'm supplying she'd have to change to ignore the current status quo.
Quantus:
--- Quote from: jonas on August 10, 2017, 03:19:56 PM ---*she can't just suddenly ignore her own logical nature that knows She'll get drug to oblivion
--- End quote ---
And if she thought the Gates would remain Defended (and whatever other Bargains are currently binding her would be taken care of), she'd not hesitate for a single second.
jonas:
--- Quote from: Quantus on August 10, 2017, 03:21:45 PM ---And if she thought the Gates would remain Defended (and whatever other Bargains are currently binding her would be taken care of), she'd not hesitate for a single second.
--- End quote ---
And that connects to the choice or the change how? this is why I hate getting off topic. it's not addressing the original issues and now it's not addressing my rebuttal either. It's driving home a point slightly to the left of mine.
If it's not readily apparent, I'm also getting confused...
--- Quote --- it's just surrendering to said Nature. It's no different than if Mab went too far in her Purpose and triggered the Titania Failsafe, it's not because she became Different, it's just that what she already was went too far.
--- End quote ---
It was never stipulated in your original supposition that any such condition would take effect before she 'had an opportunity'. You said simply if she did, it would be in her nature. But, she has the troops to do so NOW so it's not in her nature to break the balance, which if she tried to overrun earth it would. Overrunning earth might be in her nature, but just doing it is without regard is not. Drinking blood might be in Reds nature, but giving into it entirely or resisting it to remain a conscious minded being can't both be status quo.
Quantus:
--- Quote from: jonas on August 10, 2017, 03:25:33 PM ---And that connects to the choice or the change how? this is why I hate getting off topic. it's not addressing the original issues and now it's not addressing my rebuttal either. It's driving home a point slightly to the left of mine.
If it's not readily apparent, I'm also getting confused...
--- End quote ---
OK. If that's the case Im sorry, I must be missing your point. What is your point?
jonas:
--- Quote from: Quantus on August 10, 2017, 04:42:48 PM ---OK. If that's the case Im sorry, I must be missing your point. What is your point?
--- End quote ---
Let you know when I find it.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version